| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
05 Nov 2005 03:02:34 PM |
| Object: |
Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
To the LLL ( Looney Liberal Left ), this is the equivalent of heresy; the
will of the people has actually been upheld by the courts. It's no longer an
issue of who's right and who's wrong, the issue is now does the will of the
majority over-rule liberal dogma? The answer is a resounding "Yes".
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-5393263,00.html
Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban
SALEM, Ore. (AP) - A judge on Friday upheld a gay marriage ban adopted by
Oregon voters last year, rejecting claims that the amendment made too many
changes at once and interfered with local government.
In his ruling, Marion County Circuit Judge Joseph Guimond backed supporters
of the law who said the measure only clarified marriage law in a single,
simple sentence.
The Oregon amendment, passed overwhelmingly in November 2004 as Measure 36,
reads: ``It is the policy of Oregon, and its political subdivisions, that
only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or legally
recognized as a marriage.''
.
|
|
| User: "Boy Toy" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
05 Nov 2005 08:16:35 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 20:48:26 -0500, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
wrote in message <eemdnZCcPpD2_PDenZ2dnUVZ_tidnZ2d@giganews.com>
"Peacenik" <cnelsonpublic@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dkjklq$1vp$1@news.seed.net.tw...
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:q_Cdnfu7yov3g_DeRVn-qA@giganews.com...
To the LLL ( Looney Liberal Left ), this is the equivalent of heresy;
the
will of the people has actually been upheld by the courts. It's no
longer
an
issue of who's right and who's wrong, the issue is now does the will of
the
majority over-rule liberal dogma?
So, if the majority believes all Jews should be deported, do you support
such a deportation? After all, it is the "will of the people". Sorry, but
the US is a Republic, with a constitution that protects EVERYONE from a
tyrrany of the majority, and guarantees EQUAL RIGHTS for all, even for
gays
like yourself.
You are comparing apples and oranges. Deporting Jews is the removal of
rights or persecution. Enforcing the ban on gay marriage is not removing
anyone's rights nor is it persecuting anyone. Gays are not forbidden to have
relationships or have their own seperate communities, if that is what they
wish. They are not banned from marrying a member of the opposite sex. What
the voters have stated is that they do not wish to change the laws
acknowleged by societies for as far back as history has been recorded.
This is exactly the argument that was given to deny interracial
marriage (and interfaith) marriage. The vast majority of voters was
against legalization of interracial marriage but it still went
through. Also, the "laws" about marriage you reference have changed
vastly over the years.
http://www.stonewallchico.org/centerstone.html
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/pwh/1979boswell.html
Gay marriages were also legal and frequent in Rome for both males and
females. Even emperors often married other males. There was total
acceptance on the part of the populace,.....
Also Check out "The Marriage of Likeness: Same Sex Unions in
Pre-Modern Europe" by John Boswell.
Professor Boswell discovered that in addition to heterosexual marriage
ceremonies in ancient church liturgical documents (and clearly
separate from other types of non-marital blessings of adopted children
or land) were ceremonies called, among other titles, the "Office of
Same Sex Union" (10th and 11th century Greek) or the "Order for
Uniting Two Men" (11th and 12th century).
These threads have come up literally hundreds of times in the last
couple of years on usenet.
Frankly, you aren't nearly so good at arguing these points as many of
the dozens of other people who post similar arguments. You don't have
nearly the intellect that many of them do. So why don't you just shut
up you boring little wannabe troll?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie Bitch" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
05 Nov 2005 08:11:17 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 20:48:26 -0500, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "J Young"
<youngopinions@aol.com>
EDITED TO REFLECT THE ORIGINAL SOURCE MATERIAL
You are comparing apples and oranges. Deporting Jews is the removal of
rights or persecution. Enforcing the ban on interracical marriage is not removing
anyone's rights nor is it persecuting anyone. Niggers are not forbidden to have
relationships or have their own seperate communities, if that is what they
wish. They are not banned from marrying a member of another race. What
the voters have stated is that they do not wish to change the laws
acknowleged by societies for as far back as history has been recorded.
Of course, J Young will get huffy about the corrections above, but hey
-- if he can't be bothered to acknowledge the source material.....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dennis Kemmerer" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
05 Nov 2005 08:25:39 PM |
|
|
"Bonnie *****" <bonnieb@fifispad.org> wrote in message
news:3epqm1h2lrj6te3cls3tv0e3v06gno0r1q@4ax.com...
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 20:48:26 -0500, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "J Young"
<youngopinions@aol.com>
EDITED TO REFLECT THE ORIGINAL SOURCE MATERIAL
You are comparing apples and oranges. Deporting Jews is the removal of
rights or persecution. Enforcing the ban on interracical marriage is not
removing
anyone's rights nor is it persecuting anyone. Niggers are not forbidden to
have
relationships or have their own seperate communities, if that is what they
wish. They are not banned from marrying a member of another race. What
the voters have stated is that they do not wish to change the laws
acknowleged by societies for as far back as history has been recorded.
Of course, J Young will get huffy about the corrections above, but hey
-- if he can't be bothered to acknowledge the source material.....
Why is anyone still responding to 'J Young?'
.
|
|
|
| User: "Boy Toy" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
06 Nov 2005 12:36:59 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 02:25:39 GMT, "Dennis Kemmerer"
<dk@suespammers.org> wrote in message
<DQdbf.10274$7h7.2589@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>
"Bonnie *****" <bonnieb@fifispad.org> wrote in message
news:3epqm1h2lrj6te3cls3tv0e3v06gno0r1q@4ax.com...
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 20:48:26 -0500, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "J Young"
<youngopinions@aol.com>
EDITED TO REFLECT THE ORIGINAL SOURCE MATERIAL
You are comparing apples and oranges. Deporting Jews is the removal of
rights or persecution. Enforcing the ban on interracical marriage is not
removing
anyone's rights nor is it persecuting anyone. Niggers are not forbidden to
have
relationships or have their own seperate communities, if that is what they
wish. They are not banned from marrying a member of another race. What
the voters have stated is that they do not wish to change the laws
acknowleged by societies for as far back as history has been recorded.
Of course, J Young will get huffy about the corrections above, but hey
-- if he can't be bothered to acknowledge the source material.....
Why is anyone still responding to 'J Young?'
I don't know why. Boredom I guess. He just cuts and pastes
predictable crap from the usual sources, and the few responses he
makes are banal, to put it charitably.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dennis Kemmerer" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
06 Nov 2005 11:51:01 AM |
|
|
"Boy Toy" <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com> wrote in message
news:cr8rm1hk2icadl41d579692qqkq9uilh18@4ax.com...
On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 02:25:39 GMT, "Dennis Kemmerer"
<dk@suespammers.org> wrote in message
<DQdbf.10274$7h7.2589@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>
"Bonnie *****" <bonnieb@fifispad.org> wrote in message
news:3epqm1h2lrj6te3cls3tv0e3v06gno0r1q@4ax.com...
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 20:48:26 -0500, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "J Young"
<youngopinions@aol.com>
EDITED TO REFLECT THE ORIGINAL SOURCE MATERIAL
You are comparing apples and oranges. Deporting Jews is the removal of
rights or persecution. Enforcing the ban on interracical marriage is not
removing
anyone's rights nor is it persecuting anyone. Niggers are not forbidden
to
have
relationships or have their own seperate communities, if that is what
they
wish. They are not banned from marrying a member of another race. What
the voters have stated is that they do not wish to change the laws
acknowleged by societies for as far back as history has been recorded.
Of course, J Young will get huffy about the corrections above, but hey
-- if he can't be bothered to acknowledge the source material.....
Why is anyone still responding to 'J Young?'
I don't know why. Boredom I guess. He just cuts and pastes
predictable crap from the usual sources, and the few responses he
makes are banal, to put it charitably.
True, true. Plus if everyone stops responding to it, it'll nym-shift and
slither out of my twit filters that much faster.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie Bitch" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
06 Nov 2005 12:29:15 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 02:25:39 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Dennis
Kemmerer" <dk@suespammers.org>
"Bonnie *****" <bonnieb@fifispad.org> wrote in message
news:3epqm1h2lrj6te3cls3tv0e3v06gno0r1q@4ax.com...
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 20:48:26 -0500, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "J Young"
<youngopinions@aol.com>
EDITED TO REFLECT THE ORIGINAL SOURCE MATERIAL
You are comparing apples and oranges. Deporting Jews is the removal of
rights or persecution. Enforcing the ban on interracical marriage is not
removing
anyone's rights nor is it persecuting anyone. Niggers are not forbidden to
have
relationships or have their own seperate communities, if that is what they
wish. They are not banned from marrying a member of another race. What
the voters have stated is that they do not wish to change the laws
acknowleged by societies for as far back as history has been recorded.
Of course, J Young will get huffy about the corrections above, but hey
-- if he can't be bothered to acknowledge the source material.....
Why is anyone still responding to 'J Young?'
I was bored, I've been busy for a while and did not know about the
fresh troll harvest, I was bored, and I wanted to get your attention,
since the thong wasn't working out for you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. 11D Meow!" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
06 Nov 2005 12:51:52 AM |
|
|
thong ???
isn't that what david slew goliath with?
personally, i post crap at fay young sheep-fucker so he doesn't have
enough time to post more crap back, or something like that, sorry, i'm
typing with one hand over the thong thing... ha ha ha
actually, i have a pan of soup in one hand and am typing with the
other.
praise jeeezuss!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dennis Kemmerer" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
06 Nov 2005 11:51:01 AM |
|
|
"Rev. 11D Meow!" <rev.11d.meow@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131259912.085978.261350@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
thong ???
isn't that what david slew goliath with?
personally, i post crap at fay young sheep-fucker so he doesn't have
enough time to post more crap back, or something like that, sorry, i'm
typing with one hand over the thong thing... ha ha ha
actually, i have a pan of soup in one hand and am typing with the
other.
praise jeeezuss!
Braise the Lard!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel Kolle" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
06 Nov 2005 10:27:51 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 09:01:48 +0800, "Peacenik"
<cnelsonpublic@hotmail.com> thought hard and wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:q_Cdnfu7yov3g_DeRVn-qA@giganews.com...
To the LLL ( Looney Liberal Left ), this is the equivalent of heresy; the
will of the people has actually been upheld by the courts. It's no longer
an
issue of who's right and who's wrong, the issue is now does the will of
the
majority over-rule liberal dogma?
So, if the majority believes all Jews should be deported, do you support
such a deportation? After all, it is the "will of the people". Sorry, but
the US is a Republic, with a constitution that protects EVERYONE from a
tyrrany of the majority, and guarantees EQUAL RIGHTS for all, even for gays
like yourself.
*clap*
*clap*
Good job.
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 17 A.A. #2035
Koji Kondo, Yo-Yo Ma, Gustav Mahler, Krzysztof Penderecki, and Geirr Tveitt are my Gods.
Head of EAC Denial Department and Madly Insane Scientist.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Josh Rosenbluth" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
06 Nov 2005 11:49:24 AM |
|
|
Peacenik wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:q_Cdnfu7yov3g_DeRVn-qA@giganews.com...
To the LLL ( Looney Liberal Left ), this is the equivalent of heresy; the
will of the people has actually been upheld by the courts. It's no longer
an issue of who's right and who's wrong, the issue is now does the will
of the majority over-rule liberal dogma?
So, if the majority believes all Jews should be deported, do you support
such a deportation? After all, it is the "will of the people". Sorry, but
the US is a Republic, with a constitution that protects EVERYONE from a
tyrrany of the majority, and guarantees EQUAL RIGHTS for all, even for gays
like yourself.
This is much ado about nothing. J Young and the responders act as if
this decision addressed the merits of the amendment. It did not.
The Court did not rule as to whether the Oregon amendment violated
rights guaranteed by the US Constitution (of course a state
constitutional amendment cannot violate rights guaranteed by a state
constitution). It only ruled that the amendment was sufficiently
narrowly drawn to comply with Oregon's rules for amending its constitution.
Josh Rosenbluth
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Stahl" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
06 Nov 2005 12:56:25 AM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:q_Cdnfu7yov3g_DeRVn-qA@giganews.com...
To the LLL ( Looney Liberal Left ),
I take it to a fascist like yourself, that would be anyone possessed of a
conscience, a mind, or both...
this is the equivalent of heresy; the
will of the people has actually been upheld by the courts.
As you probably don't know, the entire concept of government which is
responsive to the people, as opposed to a monied and powerful elite, is the
bedrock concept of liberalism. But read on and be enlightened, as all power
must have its limits...
It's no longer an
issue of who's right and who's wrong,
That's always the issue, moron. The majority, in trampling the inalienable
right of the minority to self-determination, is wrong. Just as they were
with the issue of interracial marriage... I'm sure you oppose that too,
knuckle-dragger.
the issue is now does the will of the
majority over-rule liberal dogma?
I love that civil rights for all is "liberal dogma".
The answer is a resounding "Yes".
Yes, it is. For the moment. How unfortunate that the bigots like you still
haven't caught up.... but like all civil rights issues, the backwards
conservative will eventually be dragged kicking and screaming into a world
in which even minorities are treated fairly under the law. That the law no
longer uniformly supports your prejudice must make you sad indeed.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Parsifal" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
06 Nov 2005 02:31:51 AM |
|
|
*To the LLL ( Looney Liberal Left ), this is the equivalent of heresy;
the
*will of the people has actually been upheld by the courts. It's no
longer an
*issue of who's right and who's wrong, the issue is now does the will
of the
*majority over-rule liberal dogma? The answer is a resounding "Yes".
And here's our daily message on gay-issue from our self-loathing closet
gay, Mr. RRR (retarded retrograd rightist) in person...
"Liberal dogma"? Really? If it weren't from "liberals", you'd work 18
hours a day, including on Saturday, since you're 10, nazi-boy...
There'd still be slaves and education would be reserved to only a few.
Why do you hate the USA so much?
I still don't understand what the connection between your daily
nonsense and "alt.california", "soc.culture.jewish" and
"Seattle.politics"... Ah well... while we're at it, I also don't
understand how you can look at yourself in a mirror, J Young.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Thurisaz, Germanic barbarian" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
06 Nov 2005 02:27:20 AM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
To the LLL ( Looney Liberal Left ), this is the equivalent of heresy; the
will of the people has actually been upheld by the courts. It's no longer
an issue of who's right and who's wrong, the issue is now does the will of
the majority over-rule liberal dogma? The answer is a resounding "Yes".
Oh yeah, the idea that the constitution which establishes human rights
should be uphold even if it happens to contradict idiotic bronze-age
mythology is sooooo disgusting and dogmatic...
Oh, I forgot.
Hail Shrubbenführer!
--
"To his friend a man a friend shall prove,
And gifts with gifts requite;
But men shall mocking with mockery answer,
And fraud with falsehood meet."
(The Poetic Edda)
Must have been written with fundies in mind...
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Boy Toy" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
06 Nov 2005 01:27:56 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 16:02:34 -0500, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
wrote in message <q_Cdnfu7yov3g_DeRVn-qA@giganews.com>
To the LLL ( Looney Liberal Left ), this is the equivalent of heresy; the
will of the people has actually been upheld by the courts. It's no longer an
issue of who's right and who's wrong, the issue is now does the will of the
majority over-rule liberal dogma? The answer is a resounding "Yes".
Want to know what the repugs really think about you fundie kooks? Well
then check out what (indicted) DeLay aide Mike Scanlon says here:
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/11/03/abramoff/index_np.html
"The wackos get their information through the Christian right,
Christian radio, mail, the internet and telephone trees," Scanlon
wrote in the memo, which was read into the public record at a hearing
of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee. "Simply put, we want to bring
out the wackos to vote against something and make sure the rest of the
public lets the whole thing slip past them."
You are being manipulated. It's easy because you are too stupid to
realize it, and you will *always* be too stupid to realize it because
the only cure is education and freedom which are anathema to viruses
like you.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bonnie Bitch" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
05 Nov 2005 03:28:10 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 16:02:34 -0500, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "J Young"
<youngopinions@aol.com>
To the LLL ( Looney Liberal Left ),
A construct fabricated by christstain RepubliCUINTS
this is the equivalent of heresy; the
will of the people
*certain* people, not all, as you have just lied.
Of coursed, with you being a christstain, lying like that is de
regeur, and that concept of "all are equal under the law" is the
actual heresy.
has actually been upheld by the courts.
Sounds like the will of an activist judge -- and that's what you
christstains have been griping about ad nauseam for quite some time
now.
It's no longer an
issue of who's right and who's wrong,
It's an issue of why you christstain idiots should be allowed to run
others' lives.
the issue is now does the will of the
majority over-rule liberal dogma?
Funny how you whine when the "will of the majority" runs counter to
your personal, subjective, capricious christstain dogma.
Go mob rule!
The answer is a resounding "Yes".
Only in your empty head.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Torque wrench" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
05 Nov 2005 08:46:28 PM |
|
|
So,If we are christians does that make you a witch,Bonnie ***** ??
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tim Crowley" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
05 Nov 2005 09:07:56 PM |
|
|
Torque wrench wrote:
So,If we are christians does that make you a witch,Bonnie ***** ??
Torque, you don't have a Christian bone in your body. You are an
ignorant hateful bigot. HTH.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris Johnson" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
06 Nov 2005 02:22:35 AM |
|
|
Tim Crowley wrote:
Torque wrench wrote:
So,If we are christians does that make you a witch,Bonnie ***** ??
Torque, you don't have a Christian bone in your body. You are an
ignorant hateful bigot.
But you contradict yourself.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. 11D Meow!" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
06 Nov 2005 12:41:56 AM |
|
|
heavy emphasis on the Royal IF?, i see,
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. 11D Meow!" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
10 Nov 2005 02:38:01 AM |
|
|
Well! It's A GOG Damned GOOD thing GOD didn't step in and repress Het
Marriage at the same time.
ALL THAT FUCKED-UP PORN HETROS BE MAKING!!!
There Oughta Be A Law!!!!
***** SUCKING
and
***** LICKING
and
Three To Seven-Way
COCKS AND PUSSIES!!!!
WHEN WILL JESUS STEP IN
AND PUT A STOP TO ALL THIS
HETRO ***** ***** ACTION?
PLEASE, GOD!!!
MAKE IT STOP!!!!
My Kids Can't Take No More Watching Me ***** ...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Torque wrench" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
14 Nov 2005 06:51:24 PM |
|
|
God will lesson to your prayers, he may even convert you , if you can
open up and let the sun shine in .
See you in church sunday ,bring your kids ?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Duca" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
14 Nov 2005 09:16:24 PM |
|
|
in article 1132015884.756841.138920@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, Torque
wrench at wrote on 11/14/05 7:51 PM:
God will lesson to your prayers, he may even convert you ,
but He won't give me any money, so I have no need for Him.
Paul
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
14 Nov 2005 09:40:10 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:16:24 -0500, Paul Duca <p.duca@comcast.net>
wrote:
in article 1132015884.756841.138920@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, Torque
wrench at wrote on 11/14/05 7:51 PM:
God will lesson to your prayers, he may even convert you ,
but He won't give me any money, so I have no need for Him.
Old news: Homosexuals make money by selling their ***** (to closeted
homosexuals) on a street corner.
Paul
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gregory Gadow" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
15 Nov 2005 08:32:24 AM |
|
|
wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:16:24 -0500, Paul Duca <p.duca@comcast.net>
wrote:
in article 1132015884.756841.138920@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, Torque
wrench at wrote on 11/14/05 7:51 PM:
God will lesson to your prayers, he may even convert you ,
but He won't give me any money, so I have no need for Him.
Old news: Homosexuals make money by selling their ***** (to closeted
homosexuals) on a street corner.
Wow, I've been missing out. I make money by writing software for a brokerage
company.
--
Gregory Gadow
techbear@serv.net
http://www.serv.net/~techbear
"[W]e have never held that moral disapproval, without any other asserted
state interest, is a sufficient rationale under the Equal Protection
Clause to justify a law that discriminates among groups of persons."
- Sandra Day O`Conner, _Lawrence v Texas_
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=000&invol=02-102
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
15 Nov 2005 03:25:47 PM |
|
|
On 15-Nov-2005, Gregory Gadow <techbear@serv.net> wrote:
default@easynews.com wrote:
Old news: Homosexuals make money by selling their ***** (to closeted
homosexuals) on a street corner.
Wow, I've been missing out. I make money by writing software for a
brokerage
company.
--
Sorry - he's only extrapolating by how much *he* pays pay men to
sleep with him.
Susan
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "BYTE ME!" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
14 Nov 2005 09:51:13 PM |
|
|
wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:16:24 -0500, Paul Duca <p.duca@comcast.net>
wrote:
=20
=20
in article 1132015884.756841.138920@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, Torqu=
e
wrench at wrote on 11/14/05 7:51 PM:
God will lesson to your prayers, he may even convert you ,
but He won't give me any money, so I have no need for Him.
=20
=20
=20
Old news: Homosexuals make money by selling their ***** (to closeted
homosexuals) on a street corner.
=20
=20
And just how many have you paid?
--=20
Of all the systems of religion that ever were invented, there is none=20
more derogatory to the Almighty, more unedifying to man, more repugnant=20
to reason, and more contradictory in itself, than this thing called=20
Christianity. Too absurd for belief, too impossible to convince, and too =
inconsistent for practice, it renders the heart torpid, or produces only =
atheists and fanatics. As an engine of power, it serves the purpose of=20
despotism; and as a means of wealth, the avarice of priests; but so far=20
as respects the good of man in general, it leads to nothing here or=20
hereafter. =96Thomas Paine
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
14 Nov 2005 10:50:47 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 03:51:13 GMT, "BYTE ME!" <donotreply@nowhere.com>
wrote:
default@easynews.com wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:16:24 -0500, Paul Duca <p.duca@comcast.net>
wrote:
in article 1132015884.756841.138920@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, Torque
wrench at wrote on 11/14/05 7:51 PM:
God will lesson to your prayers, he may even convert you ,
but He won't give me any money, so I have no need for Him.
Old news: Homosexuals make money by selling their ***** (to closeted
homosexuals) on a street corner.
| ...how many I have paid!
Really? How candid of you to 'fess up.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
15 Nov 2005 05:21:12 AM |
|
|
In News k7qin152h6cm0ees75o6c2todmq3g2tkjl@4ax.com,, at
, typed this:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 03:51:13 GMT, "BYTE ME!" <donotreply@nowhere.com>
wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:16:24 -0500, Paul Duca <p.duca@comcast.net>
wrote:
in article 1132015884.756841.138920@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com,
Torque wrench at wrote on 11/14/05 7:51 PM:
God will lesson to your prayers, he may even convert you ,
but He won't give me any money, so I have no need for Him.
Old news: Homosexuals make money by selling their ***** (to closeted
homosexuals) on a street corner.
...how many have you paid?
Oh... about 15 or 20 I guess.
Really, we didn't need to know that.
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded
fear. - Thomas Jefferson
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Duca" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
15 Nov 2005 06:25:30 PM |
|
|
in article h3min1h7spsddctbc7aghci2dgdim46ofo@4ax.com,
at wrote on 11/14/05 10:40 PM:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:16:24 -0500, Paul Duca <p.duca@comcast.net>
wrote:
in article 1132015884.756841.138920@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, Torque
wrench at wrote on 11/14/05 7:51 PM:
God will lesson to your prayers, he may even convert you ,
but He won't give me any money, so I have no need for Him.
Old news: Homosexuals make money by selling their ***** (to closeted
homosexuals) on a street corner.
So do women who aren't considered sexy/dumb enough to marry by men
like you...
Paul
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Duca" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
05 Nov 2005 07:43:19 PM |
|
|
in article q_Cdnfu7yov3g_DeRVn-qA@giganews.com, J Young at
youngopinions@aol.com wrote on 11/5/05 4:02 PM:
To the LLL ( Looney Liberal Left ), this is the equivalent of heresy; the
will of the people has actually been upheld by the courts. It's no longer an
issue of who's right and who's wrong, the issue is now does the will of the
majority over-rule liberal dogma? The answer is a resounding "Yes".
` Not until God makes every homophobe in Oregon a millionaire...why
else would they bother?
Paul
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. 11D Meow!" |
|
| Title: Re: Judge Upholds Oregon Gay Marriage Ban |
06 Nov 2005 01:02:47 AM |
|
|
yeah!
shout it from duh roof-tops!
Oregon is just as stupid as ewe are, sheep-fucker!
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
