| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"George Wright" |
| Date: |
23 Jan 2005 06:11:08 PM |
| Object: |
Junior atheists? |
Duke, in several of your posts, you apply the designation "junior atheist"
to other posters. I assume that's your characterization.
What do you mean this to convey? Do you distinguish between junior atheists
and others? if so, how?
Geo
.
|
|
| User: "quibbler" |
|
| Title: Re: Junior atheists? |
24 Jan 2005 03:48:16 AM |
|
|
In article <m6udneniSMpfdW7cRVn-vA@comcast.com>, says...
Duke, in several of your posts, you apply the designation "junior atheist"
As with pretty much everything duke says, it's not original. The term,
in some incarnation or another has been used by other trolls before duke
as a weak pejorative.
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.
|
|
|
| User: "FreeThink" |
|
| Title: Re: Junior atheists? |
25 Jan 2005 06:06:16 AM |
|
|
quibbler wrote:
In article <m6udneniSMpfdW7cRVn-vA@comcast.com>,
says...
Duke, in several of your posts, you apply the designation "junior
atheist"
As with pretty much everything duke says, it's not original. The
term,
in some incarnation or another has been used by other trolls before
duke
as a weak pejorative.
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
Thats not a bad idea though. A non-christian type of boy scouts for
atheist young people.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Junior atheists? |
24 Jan 2005 12:13:03 AM |
|
|
In our last episode <m6udneniSMpfdW7cRVn-vA@comcast.com>, George Wright
lumbered into the room and mumbled:
Duke, in several of your posts, you apply the designation "junior atheist"
to other posters. I assume that's your characterization.
What do you mean this to convey? Do you distinguish between junior
atheists and others? if so, how?
He's apparently trying to be insulting. But he's not very *good at it...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
-- Seneca the Younger
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Junior atheists? |
24 Jan 2005 01:36:20 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:13:03 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> said in alt.atheism:
In our last episode <m6udneniSMpfdW7cRVn-vA@comcast.com>, George Wright
lumbered into the room and mumbled:
Duke, in several of your posts, you apply the designation "junior atheist"
to other posters. I assume that's your characterization.
What do you mean this to convey? Do you distinguish between junior
atheists and others? if so, how?
He's apparently trying to be insulting. But he's not very *good at it...
The only things Earl is good at are being wrong and being stupid.
--
"I have never imputed to Nature a purpose or a goal, or anything that could be under-
stood as anthropomorphic. What I see in Nature is a magnificent structure that we can
comprehend only very imperfectly, and that must fill a thinking person with a feeling of
humility. This is a genuinely religious feeling that has nothing to do with mysticism."
- 1954 or 1955; quoted in Dukas and Hoffman _Albert Einstein the Human Side_, p. 39
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Junior atheists? |
24 Jan 2005 03:20:28 PM |
|
|
In our last episode <q7k8v09lsjaquvs285m3go9u3b24rkbjqd@4ax.com>, Al Klein
lumbered into the room and mumbled:
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:13:03 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> said in alt.atheism:
In our last episode <m6udneniSMpfdW7cRVn-vA@comcast.com>, George Wright
lumbered into the room and mumbled:
Duke, in several of your posts, you apply the designation "junior
atheist" to other posters. I assume that's your characterization.
What do you mean this to convey? Do you distinguish between junior
atheists and others? if so, how?
He's apparently trying to be insulting. But he's not very *good at it...
The only things Earl is good at are being wrong and being stupid.
And is going for the gold in those categories...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
-- Seneca the Younger
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: Junior atheists? |
23 Jan 2005 11:29:19 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:11:08 -0500, "George Wright" <geo@loyola.edu>
wrote:
Duke, in several of your posts, you apply the designation "junior atheist"
to other posters. I assume that's your characterization.
What do you mean this to convey? Do you distinguish between junior atheists
and others? if so, how?
He wants to convey that even 10 year old atheists can do better math
than him:
"engineer" duke's idiot version
================================================
"It's also very dramatic to note that the sudden change in direction
occurred in Clinton's 2nd term with the start of the Clinton recession
in 2000 with the deficit change going from 0.1 to 0.14,"
================================================
The correct version, when you realize that 5.66-5.65=.01:
================================================
"It's also very dramatic to note that the sudden change in direction
occurred in AWOL's term with the start of the AWOL recession in 2001
with the deficit change going from 0.1 to 0.14,"
================================================
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1371 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Junior atheists? |
25 Jan 2005 11:53:06 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:29:19 -0800, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:11:08 -0500, "George Wright" <geo@loyola.edu>
wrote:
Duke, in several of your posts, you apply the designation "junior atheist"
to other posters. I assume that's your characterization.
See what I mean.
What do you mean this to convey? Do you distinguish between junior atheists
and others? if so, how?
He wants to convey that even 10 year old atheists can do better math
than him:
"engineer" duke's idiot version
================================================
"It's also very dramatic to note that the sudden change in direction
occurred in Clinton's 2nd term with the start of the Clinton recession
in 2000 with the deficit change going from 0.1 to 0.14,"
================================================
The correct version, when you realize that 5.66-5.65=.01:
================================================
"It's also very dramatic to note that the sudden change in direction
occurred in AWOL's term with the start of the AWOL recession in 2001
with the deficit change going from 0.1 to 0.14,"
================================================
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1371 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Junior atheists? |
23 Jan 2005 07:17:20 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:11:08 -0500, "George Wright" <geo@loyola.edu>
wrote:
Duke, in several of your posts, you apply the designation "junior atheist"
to other posters. I assume that's your characterization.
It's Duke's idea of an insult. Pretty lame, but it's the best he can
do. <G>
What do you mean this to convey? Do you distinguish between junior atheists
and others? if so, how?
Geo
.
|
|
|
| User: "George Wright" |
|
| Title: Re: Junior atheists? |
25 Jan 2005 01:38:22 AM |
|
|
"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:87u7v0do9tarmeb8ubcpbubfbcuk2jtntq@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:11:08 -0500, "George Wright" <geo@loyola.edu>
wrote:
Duke, in several of your posts, you apply the designation "junior atheist"
to other posters. I assume that's your characterization.
It's Duke's idea of an insult. Pretty lame, but it's the best he can
do. <G>
Well, I was hoping to get Duke's side. I'll ask again with "Duke" in the
Subject line.
[...]
Geo
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "old hoodoo" |
|
| Title: How did I get here? |
23 Jan 2005 08:31:13 PM |
|
|
I have no answers to anything, just some comments questions that I
would appreciate any response from atheists if I am out of line
or perhaps on point about something. That is presuming there is a line,
of course.
I have lost all faith in the existence do dieties.
I don't don't think I have ever truly believed, but the
few times I prayed in high stress situations I felt better.
Now, I don't pray but I try to draw strength from inside me
and am somehow able to do it, although I don't know how I am doing it.
Perhaps the proper chemicals are induced when I tighten my jaw, scowl,
or clench my fist.
Although I was convinced that dieties do not exist beforehand, 9/11 and
what has followed has made me almost hate religion, but not hate the
concept of a hands-off God (even if he existed), but any organized
religious faith as all seem to pervert their fundamental teachings in
some manner, usually through attempted to "force" their beleif
structures on other folks. The current worldwide holy war with militant
fundamentalist Islam is nothing new, it's currency helps me focus. It
appears to me that faith can generate just as much evil as good,
although, in the long run, it probably serves a purpose in helping
ordinary, escpecially ignorant
people in finding meaning in their lives and also helps prevent disorder
and also does much good in terms of charities etc, although I think I am
correct in saying that in areas where
God did exist before Christians and Muslims etc brought the faith, many
societies seem to have gotten along fine, although most were primitive.
I assume that religion has been a major factor in making civilization
what it is today by creating moral norms for worldwide distribution.
As an educated but still ignorant person I think I can see the reason
for religion as well as the lessening need for it in the world. The
current state of religions have their roots in a very ignorant past.
"New" religions, or at least new belief structures that try to blend
science and faith seem to be patently absurd.
However, most educated people still tend to believe in a diety yet their
actions are not consistent with the fundamental faith they purport to
support. Arrogance, perhaps?
I don't know. I guess I am rambling. I have become fairly comfortable
with my belief, although I still have this fear of death (unknown) that
is not an overriding fear, I accept it, but I guess an unease as I have
no real concept of life after death.
To me we are finite beings to whom death brings the end of our
existence. We did not exist before birth and will not exist afterwards.
Through bizarre burial techniques that conserve the corpse it is
unlikely our basic elements will replenish the earth ever again. We are
burided deep in the ground so that our bodies will never again
contribute to life. I find that disheartening. Guess I am a soylent
green kind of person. It is what we do on earth now that defines us to
civilization and to ourselves, at least while we exist.
When death comes, I don't think there will be any flying out and being
one with the heavens...we are so insignificant in the universal picture.
We belong here, we exist, like everything else in the universe exists.
We are more complex than most of the matter found in the universe and I
think it is undoubted that life exists here and there in our galaxy and
throughout the universe, but that life is so distant that it is unlikely
that we will even know it.
But my realization (that is my feeling) is that none of the that
matters. Any piece of matter should stand for something. Although our
life is only a sub atomic faint flash in the universal scheme, I think
we still have value, although it is not the value that we tend to
put on ourselves. Although we lip-service it, society still seems to
tend to think that we are the eventually masters of the universe, that
we, will eventually become God.
I don't know where I am going with this. Probably nowhere.
Is what I feel an uncommon feeling, or do others share it?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ike" |
|
| Title: Re: How did I get here? |
24 Jan 2005 01:53:22 AM |
|
|
"old hoodoo" <alflags@cox-internet.com> wrote in message
news:10v82ckirac5t7e@corp.supernews.com...
I have no answers to anything, just some comments questions that I
would appreciate any response from atheists if I am out of line
or perhaps on point about something. That is presuming there is a line,
of course.
I have lost all faith in the existence do dieties.
I don't don't think I have ever truly believed, but the
few times I prayed in high stress situations I felt better.
Now, I don't pray but I try to draw strength from inside me
and am somehow able to do it, although I don't know how I am doing it.
Perhaps the proper chemicals are induced when I tighten my jaw, scowl,
or clench my fist.
Although I was convinced that dieties do not exist beforehand, 9/11 and
what has followed has made me almost hate religion, but not hate the
concept of a hands-off God (even if he existed), but any organized
religious faith as all seem to pervert their fundamental teachings in
some manner, usually through attempted to "force" their beleif
structures on other folks. The current worldwide holy war with militant
fundamentalist Islam is nothing new, it's currency helps me focus. It
appears to me that faith can generate just as much evil as good,
although, in the long run, it probably serves a purpose in helping
ordinary, escpecially ignorant
people in finding meaning in their lives and also helps prevent disorder
and also does much good in terms of charities etc, although I think I am
correct in saying that in areas where
God did exist before Christians and Muslims etc brought the faith, many
societies seem to have gotten along fine, although most were primitive.
I assume that religion has been a major factor in making civilization
what it is today by creating moral norms for worldwide distribution.
As an educated but still ignorant person I think I can see the reason
for religion as well as the lessening need for it in the world. The
current state of religions have their roots in a very ignorant past.
"New" religions, or at least new belief structures that try to blend
science and faith seem to be patently absurd.
However, most educated people still tend to believe in a diety yet their
actions are not consistent with the fundamental faith they purport to
support. Arrogance, perhaps?
I don't know. I guess I am rambling. I have become fairly comfortable
with my belief, although I still have this fear of death (unknown) that
is not an overriding fear, I accept it, but I guess an unease as I have
no real concept of life after death.
To me we are finite beings to whom death brings the end of our
existence. We did not exist before birth and will not exist afterwards.
Through bizarre burial techniques that conserve the corpse it is
unlikely our basic elements will replenish the earth ever again. We are
burided deep in the ground so that our bodies will never again
contribute to life. I find that disheartening. Guess I am a soylent
green kind of person. It is what we do on earth now that defines us to
civilization and to ourselves, at least while we exist.
When death comes, I don't think there will be any flying out and being
one with the heavens...we are so insignificant in the universal picture.
We belong here, we exist, like everything else in the universe exists.
We are more complex than most of the matter found in the universe and I
think it is undoubted that life exists here and there in our galaxy and
throughout the universe, but that life is so distant that it is unlikely
that we will even know it.
But my realization (that is my feeling) is that none of the that
matters. Any piece of matter should stand for something. Although our
life is only a sub atomic faint flash in the universal scheme, I think
we still have value, although it is not the value that we tend to
put on ourselves. Although we lip-service it, society still seems to
tend to think that we are the eventually masters of the universe, that
we, will eventually become God.
I don't know where I am going with this. Probably nowhere.
Is what I feel an uncommon feeling, or do others share it?
i'm not sure what you're feeling, most people can share any feeling since we
all have the same apparatus, as long as we have the same experience to let
us have the same feeling. So not having read your entire post, I would say
that yes, I probably have the same feeling.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Les Hellawell" |
|
| Title: Re: How did I get here? |
24 Jan 2005 09:55:13 AM |
|
|
Someone wrote
I have lost all faith in the existence do dieties.
I don't don't think I have ever truly believed, but the
few times I prayed in high stress situations I felt better.
Now, I don't pray but I try to draw strength from inside me
and am somehow able to do it, although I don't know how I am doing it.
Perhaps the proper chemicals are induced when I tighten my jaw, scowl,
or clench my fist.
No, that sound more like a peevish young boy who cannot get his
way and is too immature to have learned how to control his emotions.
Why do you need to draw strength anyway what is causing you stress
in the first place? Using what you call prayer is just a placebo and
does not solve problems. As you have found out magic tricks no longer
work when they have been exposed. You provident plan is to try and
discover what is causing the stress and learn for yourself how to
cope with it. Perhaps counselling might help you discover your
problem?
--
Les Hellawell
greetings from
YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "pensul" |
|
| Title: Re: How did I get here? |
25 Jan 2005 11:07:32 PM |
|
|
But my realization (that is my feeling) is that none of the that
matters.
It is obvious that humans are not like everything else in the universe. They
have rational ability, which makes them masters of the universe, however that
may fit in with their religious views. God allows this to happen for a reason.
In becoming masters of the universe, they become masters of themselves, and
thus draw closer to their Creator. The universe itself is not identical with
the Creator. This would be like a painting telling the painter what to paint.
The religions also did not occur sporadically; each has served its purpose
in history, and it is only later when humanity tried to use them for selfish
purposes that their influence declined. They have all been preparing the souls
to realize that "the potentialities inherent in the station of man, the full
measure of his destiny on earth, the innate excellence of his reality, must all
be manifested in this promised Day of God". ( Baha'u'llah, Gleanings CLXII )
--
"The world of existence is an emanation of the merciful attribute of God."
Abdul-Baha
http://www.costarricense.cr/pagina/ernobe
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: How did I get here? |
26 Jan 2005 12:05:46 AM |
|
|
"pensul" <royspensul@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:35o1pjF4m4hhoU1@individual.net...
But my realization (that is my feeling) is that none of the that
matters.
It is obvious that humans are not like everything else in the universe.
Uh huh. So you're aware of EVERY life form in the universe?
--
---------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Les Hellawell" |
|
| Title: Re: How did I get here? |
26 Jan 2005 01:18:42 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:05:46 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
"pensul" <royspensul@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:35o1pjF4m4hhoU1@individual.net...
But my realization (that is my feeling) is that none of the that
matters.
It is obvious that humans are not like everything else in the universe.
Uh huh. So you're aware of EVERY life form in the universe?
So it seems. He also know there is a god and everything about this
god it seems. He know what the god thinks and does. I guess he
thinks he is superior to this god if he can read its mind. Maybe he
is god?
--
Les Hellawell
greetings from
YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: How did I get here? |
26 Jan 2005 01:37:02 PM |
|
|
"Les Hellawell" <myshredder@leswell.freeuk.com> wrote in message
news:q26fv0to51qmn81hn6rl1jnpmb0oref3vv@4ax.com...
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:05:46 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
"pensul" <royspensul@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:35o1pjF4m4hhoU1@individual.net...
But my realization (that is my feeling) is that none of the that
matters.
It is obvious that humans are not like everything else in the universe.
Uh huh. So you're aware of EVERY life form in the universe?
So it seems. He also know there is a god and everything about this
god it seems. He know what the god thinks and does. I guess he
thinks he is superior to this god if he can read its mind. Maybe he
is god?
If so, he's an extremely incoherent one :P
--
---------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew Lias" |
|
| Title: Re: How did I get here? |
26 Jan 2005 05:17:31 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:37:02 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
"Les Hellawell" <myshredder@leswell.freeuk.com> wrote in message
news:q26fv0to51qmn81hn6rl1jnpmb0oref3vv@4ax.com...
So it seems. He also know there is a god and everything about this
god it seems. He know what the god thinks and does. I guess he
thinks he is superior to this god if he can read its mind. Maybe he
is god?
If so, he's an extremely incoherent one :P
From my readings of mythologies, I would say that incoherancy is the
norm among gods.
--
Andrew Lias
http://andrewlias.blogspot.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: How did I get here? |
26 Jan 2005 11:17:46 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:18:42 +0000, Les Hellawell
<myshredder@leswell.freeuk.com> wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:05:46 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
"pensul" <royspensul@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:35o1pjF4m4hhoU1@individual.net...
But my realization (that is my feeling) is that none of the that
matters.
It is obvious that humans are not like everything else in the universe.
Uh huh. So you're aware of EVERY life form in the universe?
So it seems. He also know there is a god and everything about this
god it seems. He know what the god thinks and does. I guess he
thinks he is superior to this god if he can read its mind. Maybe he
is god?
Same mindless sphincter so....
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: How did I get here? |
26 Jan 2005 11:59:20 PM |
|
|
In our last episode <35o1pjF4m4hhoU1@individual.net>, pensul lumbered into
the room and mumbled:
But my realization (that is my feeling) is that none of the that
matters.
It is obvious that humans are not like everything else in the universe.
You've done a survey have you?
They have rational ability,
That's debatable.
which makes them masters of the universe,
however that may fit in with their religious views. God allows this to
happen for a reason. In becoming masters of the universe,
Of the UNIVERSE? We can't even get out of our solar system.
they become
masters of themselves, and thus draw closer to their Creator. The
universe itself is not identical with the Creator. This would be like a
painting telling the painter what to paint. The religions also did not
occur sporadically; each has served its purpose in history, and it is only
later when humanity tried to use them for selfish purposes that their
influence declined. They have all been preparing the souls to realize
that "the potentialities inherent in the station of man, the full measure
of his destiny on earth, the innate excellence of his reality, must all be
manifested in this promised Day of God". ( Baha'u'llah, Gleanings CLXII )
Man, hubris abounds...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
-- Seneca the Younger
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Les Hellawell" |
|
| Title: Re: How did I get here? |
26 Jan 2005 01:16:52 PM |
|
|
On 25 Jan 2005 23:07:32 GMT, pensul <royspensul@yahoo.com> wrote:
But my realization (that is my feeling) is that none of the that
matters.
It is obvious that humans are not like everything else in the universe.
Since you do not know what is in the rest of the universe, we cannot
even detect all of it in our telescopes it is far from obvious.
They
have rational ability, which makes them masters of the universe,
How can we be masters of the universe when we cannot yet get
beyond the moon. There may be living (not divine) so superior
in intellect to us that we are as ants to them. We just don't know
and certainly cannot make dogmatic assertions of that kind.
however that
may fit in with their religious views. God allows this to happen for a reason.
Sorry, but what god is this and how do you know it "aloowed this to
happen" a this that is just unsubstantiated assertion on your part
based on ignorance.
In becoming masters of the universe, they become masters of themselves, and
thus draw closer to their Creator. The universe itself is not identical with
the Creator. This would be like a painting telling the painter what to paint.
The religions also did not occur sporadically; each has served its purpose
in history, and it is only later when humanity tried to use them for selfish
purposes that their influence declined. They have all been preparing the souls
to realize that "the potentialities inherent in the station of man, the full
measure of his destiny on earth, the innate excellence of his reality, must all
be manifested in this promised Day of God". ( Baha'u'llah, Gleanings CLXII )
Usual religious fantasy which should not be posted to this newsgroup
--
Les Hellawell
greetings from
YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: How did I get here? |
24 Jan 2005 02:23:42 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 14:31:13 -0600, old hoodoo
<alflags@cox-internet.com> said in alt.atheism:
However, most educated people still tend to believe in a diety yet their
actions are not consistent with the fundamental faith they purport to
support. Arrogance, perhaps?
The actions are prescribed for sinners. They aren't the sinners their
religion is talking about.
I don't know. I guess I am rambling. I have become fairly comfortable
with my belief, although I still have this fear of death (unknown) that
is not an overriding fear, I accept it, but I guess an unease as I have
no real concept of life after death.
Take it from someone who has been dead (flatline EKG and EEG) - death
is as easy as before you were conceived.
Dying may be bad - depending on what causes you to die - but death is
easy.
I don't know where I am going with this. Probably nowhere.
Is what I feel an uncommon feeling, or do others share it?
Not knowing where you're going with stream-of-consciousness writing?
Very common.
--
"...I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do.
When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand
why I dismiss yours."
- Stephen F. Roberts
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: How did I get here? |
25 Jan 2005 04:59:54 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 14:31:13 -0600, old hoodoo
<alflags@cox-internet.com> wrote:
I have no answers to anything, just some comments questions that I
would appreciate any response from atheists if I am out of line
or perhaps on point about something. That is presuming there is a line,
of course.
Speaking for myself only.
I have lost all faith in the existence do dieties.
Faith is only needed when evidence is absent or contrary.
I don't don't think I have ever truly believed, but the
few times I prayed in high stress situations I felt better.
Understandable. Such action-meditation-whatever-put things into a
reduced anxiety mode and gave your mind time to come up with
solution(s).
Now, I don't pray but I try to draw strength from inside me
and am somehow able to do it, although I don't know how I am doing it.
Perhaps the proper chemicals are induced when I tighten my jaw, scowl,
or clench my fist.
IMO, you were drawing on the reserve that was always there. People far
too often short change themselves on what they can do.
Although I was convinced that dieties do not exist beforehand, 9/11 and
what has followed has made me almost hate religion, but not hate the
concept of a hands-off God (even if he existed), but any organized
religious faith as all seem to pervert their fundamental teachings in
some manner, usually through attempted to "force" their beleif
structures on other folks.
Correct.
The current worldwide holy war with militant
fundamentalist Islam is nothing new, it's currency helps me focus. It
appears to me that faith can generate just as much evil as good,
Much more evil, imo, and usually the 'good' is like a dog rolling over
and doing tricks in search of that treat. Binary superstitions with a
heaven/hell have that problem. With either a 'heaven' or 'eternal
torture' as the only end results there isn't anything the person won't
do to avoid the latter.
although, in the long run, it probably serves a purpose in helping
ordinary, escpecially ignorant people in finding meaning in their
lives and also helps prevent disorder
'meaning?' If a persons 'meaning' was a fleeting 'part' which has
passed then what?
'disorder?' Clashes between different superstitions or different
sects of the same superstition are the problem, not the solution.
Bombings, murder, assassinations, sabotage are not a help to society.
and also does much good in terms of charities etc, although I think I am
correct in saying that in areas where
God did exist before Christians and Muslims etc brought the faith, many
societies seem to have gotten along fine, although most were primitive.
The most technologically advance societies are still primitive as they
continue to lug along bronze age baggage.
I assume that religion has been a major factor in making civilization
what it is today by creating moral norms for worldwide distribution.
Civilization is an excellant idea. It should be tried sometime.
'Moral norms?' Sorry, they don't exist. In Christianity, for
instance, rapine, genocide, theft, bigotry, prejudice, ignorance, and
more are authorized/ordered/encouraged/rewarded.
As an educated but still ignorant person I think I can see the reason
for religion as well as the lessening need for it in the world. The
current state of religions have their roots in a very ignorant past.
Correct on both counts.
"New" religions, or at least new belief structures that try to blend
science and faith seem to be patently absurd.
Agreed.
However, most educated people still tend to believe in a diety yet their
actions are not consistent with the fundamental faith they purport to
support. Arrogance, perhaps?
Hypocracy just as 'Jesus' and 'God' set the 'example.'
I don't know. I guess I am rambling. I have become fairly comfortable
with my belief, although I still have this fear of death (unknown) that
is not an overriding fear, I accept it, but I guess an unease as I have
no real concept of life after death.
Death is nothing to fear as no one experiances it.
To me we are finite beings to whom death brings the end of our
existence. We did not exist before birth and will not exist afterwards.
Through bizarre burial techniques that conserve the corpse it is
unlikely our basic elements will replenish the earth ever again. We are
burided deep in the ground so that our bodies will never again
contribute to life. I find that disheartening. Guess I am a soylent
green kind of person. It is what we do on earth now that defines us to
civilization and to ourselves, at least while we exist.
Oh, they will contribute to life-in time.
When death comes, I don't think there will be any flying out and being
one with the heavens...we are so insignificant in the universal picture.
We belong here, we exist, like everything else in the universe exists.
We are more complex than most of the matter found in the universe and I
think it is undoubted that life exists here and there in our galaxy and
throughout the universe, but that life is so distant that it is unlikely
that we will even know it.
High probability of said life being, hopefully, intelligent enough not
to be destroying their environments and each other.
But my realization (that is my feeling) is that none of the that
matters. Any piece of matter should stand for something. Although our
life is only a sub atomic faint flash in the universal scheme, I think
we still have value, although it is not the value that we tend to
put on ourselves. Although we lip-service it, society still seems to
tend to think that we are the eventually masters of the universe, that
we, will eventually become God.
Hubris. (flash image of the picture entitled "The Last Act of
Defiance.") The universe is 'master.'
I don't know where I am going with this. Probably nowhere.
That's ok. Exploration and investigation.
Is what I feel an uncommon feeling, or do others share it?
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Les Hellawell" |
|
| Title: Re: Junior atheists? |
23 Jan 2005 08:15:30 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:17:20 GMT, John Baker <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:11:08 -0500, "George Wright" <geo@loyola.edu>
wrote:
Duke, in several of your posts, you apply the designation "junior atheist"
to other posters. I assume that's your characterization.
It's Duke's idea of an insult. Pretty lame, but it's the best he can
do. <G>
What about his one moment after gambit? Sure scares the hell out of me
:-)
--
Les Hellawell
greetings from
YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Junior atheists? |
23 Jan 2005 10:50:06 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:15:30 +0000, Les Hellawell
<myshredder@leswell.freeuk.com> said in alt.atheism:
What about his one moment after gambit?
You mean the ***** about what'll happen one moment after we die?
Sure scares the hell out of me
About like my warning you about the dangers of being in Britain.
--
"Christianity has already had the chance to govern
the world according to its own ethical standards.
It was called the "Dark Ages".
- Bill, The Avender
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Junior atheists? |
24 Jan 2005 06:51:48 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:15:30 +0000, Les Hellawell
<myshredder@leswell.freeuk.com> wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:17:20 GMT, John Baker <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:11:08 -0500, "George Wright" <geo@loyola.edu>
wrote:
Duke, in several of your posts, you apply the designation "junior atheist"
to other posters. I assume that's your characterization.
It's Duke's idea of an insult. Pretty lame, but it's the best he can
do. <G>
What about his one moment after gambit? Sure scares the hell out of me
:-)
Yep, has me quaking in my boots. <G> Even if I turn out to be wrong
and there *is* a god, I'm sure the creator of the universe has far
more important things to worry about than whether or not some schmuck
from Ohio believes he exists. :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Junior atheists? |
25 Jan 2005 05:03:20 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 06:51:48 GMT, John Baker <nunya@bizniz.net> said
in alt.atheism:
Yep, has me quaking in my boots. <G> Even if I turn out to be wrong
and there *is* a god, I'm sure the creator of the universe has far
more important things to worry about than whether or not some schmuck
from Ohio believes he exists. :-)
Now if you were from DC - where God's people work ...
--
"If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can
solve them."
-Isaac Asimov
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Junior atheists? |
25 Jan 2005 11:52:20 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:11:08 -0500, "George Wright" <geo@loyola.edu> wrote:
Duke, in several of your posts, you apply the designation "junior atheist"
to other posters. I assume that's your characterization.
What do you mean this to convey? Do you distinguish between junior atheists
and others? if so, how?
Most demonstrate their immaturity by their language style and expressions.
Yang Hu is a good example. He's supposedly a 30 years old with a PhD in
economics. Yet he has yet to demonstrate that he is anything but a high school
harry with the things he says. Since he first posted, I have yet to observe any
discussion ability out of him other than attacking the character of others with
short, snippy comments.
That's yang.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Junior atheists? |
25 Jan 2005 07:56:28 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 05:52:20 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:11:08 -0500, "George Wright" <geo@loyola.edu> wrote:
Duke, in several of your posts, you apply the designation "junior atheist"
to other posters. I assume that's your characterization.
What do you mean this to convey? Do you distinguish between junior atheists
and others? if so, how?
Most demonstrate their immaturity by their language style and expressions.
Yang Hu is a good example. He's supposedly a 30 years old with a PhD in
economics. Yet he has yet to demonstrate that he is anything but a high school
harry with the things he says. Since he first posted, I have yet to observe any
discussion ability out of him other than attacking the character of others with
short, snippy comments.
That's yang.
Even if I were to concede you this small point, what's your
justification for assuming that Yang is typical of us all?
In any case, this is a classic example of the "Pot And Kettle
Argument", Duke, since in all the years you've been posting to
alt.atheism, I have yet to see you actually discuss anything.
Oh, it isn't that I haven't seen you try. I'll give you that much. But
when the tide turns against you, as it nearly always does, out come
the ad-homs as, in typical Christian fashion, you proclaim victory
while in full retreat. <G>
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|