Religions > Atheism > Kansas Voters Tell Rightwing Anti-Gay Bigots To ***** Themselves.
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
| Date: |
02 Mar 2005 09:28:00 PM |
| Object: |
Kansas Voters Tell Rightwing Anti-Gay Bigots To ***** Themselves. |
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=543401
TOPEKA, Kan. - Voters on Tuesday upheld an ordinance that prohibits
discrimination against homosexuals in municipal hiring, turning back a
repeal movement led by a minister known for picketing the funerals of
AIDS (news - web sites) victims.
One of the minister's granddaughters, meanwhile, fell far short in her
efforts to unseat an openly gay member of the City Council.
The Rev. Fred Phelps Sr. was seeking to remove from the books a city
ordinance that prohibits discrimination against gays in municipal
hiring. The repeal measure would also bar Topeka from reinstating such
protections for 10 years.
In final, unofficial results, 53 percent opposed the repeal, with
14,285 voting "no," and 12,795 voting "yes."
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1498 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Kansas Voters Tell Rightwing Anti-Gay Bigots To ***** Themselves. |
05 Mar 2005 06:15:09 PM |
|
|
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
[...]
<snip>
All whines cries and moans by you, barnes, and patrick go unheard and
unread
until you can stand up and apologize and admit to the MANY lies you have
told about me in this newsgroup.
You guys are better off acting like children and crying to each other and
talking about me, that is the only way your cries, whines, and moans will
get read...that is by each other.
<snip>
All whines cries and moans by you, barnes, and patrick go unheard and unread
until you can stand up and apologize and admit to the MANY lies you have
told about me in this newsgroup.
You guys are better off acting like children and crying to each other and
talking about me, that is the only way your cries, whines, and moans will
get read...that is by each other.
Responding to yourself? I'll bet your handlers at Wilmington College of
Delaware are really proud of you, Rent-a-Guard...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 3, Hartford 1 (March 4)
NEXT GAME: Monday, March 7 vs. Grand Rapids (at St. Paul), 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Kansas Voters Tell Rightwing Anti-Gay Bigots To ***** Themselves. |
05 Mar 2005 06:07:16 PM |
|
|
In article <paedndgJNOHHrbffRVn-1A@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
All whines cries and moans by you, barnes, and patrick go unheard and
unread
until you can stand up and apologize and admit to the MANY lies you have
told about me in this newsgroup.
You guys are better off acting like children and crying to each other and
talking about me, that is the only way your cries, whines, and moans will
get read...that is by each other.
<snip>
All whines cries and moans by you, barnes, and patrick go unheard and unread
until you can stand up and apologize and admit to the MANY lies you have
told about me in this newsgroup.
You guys are better off acting like children and crying to each other and
talking about me, that is the only way your cries, whines, and moans will
get read...that is by each other.
Just think, Adam. Osprey is now at a point where he reads our stuff,
snips it, and simply pastes in a paragraph because he can't respond.
This has become his life. LOL!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pr0r3p" |
|
| Title: Re: Kansas Voters Tell Rightwing Anti-Gay Bigots To ***** Themselves. |
05 Mar 2005 04:02:32 PM |
|
|
Osprey wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:hq6k2190jljn7krss3n5ad9b397scmn5ed@4ax.com...
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 15:08:09 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote, akin to the neighing and braying of farmyard animals:
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1110050443.346949.100850@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1109979697.122661.302650@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1109910630.521738.256620@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk8y546p4w.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1109894492.855088.141490@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:6okd21lgks5t3q9nep9bot6mnlut40o8mr@4ax.com...
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 01:21:14 -0500, "Rev. Donald
Spitz"
<Glory2Jesus@ArmyofGod.com> in alt.abortion with
message-id
<y1yVd.35788$755.1063@lakeread05> wrote:
Controlled by sex perverted fags which the Bible
describes
as
being
reprobate.
Spitzie - why do you quote from your book of myth
before
you
prove it
is valid?
Why do you call it a myth without proving it is a
myth?
Because it fits the definition of a myth perfectly.
"A traditional, typically ancient story dealing with
supernatural
beings, ancestors, or heroes that serves as a
fundamental
type
in
the
worldview of a people, as by explaining aspects of the
natural
world or
delineating the psychology, customs, or ideals of
society"
The Bible is certainly "traditional" and "ancient
stories".
It
is
loaded with supernatural beings, ancestors, and
heroes. It
explains
provides a worldview of the a people by explaining
aspects
of
the
natural world and delineates the psychology, customs,
and
ideals
of a
society. It is loaded with magic and impossible
events and
feats.
Basically, it is obvious to anyone with a brain and an
education
that
it is a book of myths. It has been proven to be a
book of
myths
to you
in the past, but you are either too dishonest or to
stupid
to
remember.
I do not call it a book of myths. You do.
You're the one claiming it's true -- so where's your
proof,
Psycho
Boy?
I am asking for Proof from those who call it lies or myth.
Where did I claim it to be true?
You are assuming too much.
And you got it. Unfortunately, you cannot handle it.
Mark Sebree
You think you have proved that the Bible is a book of myths?
Yes.
When did the Bible become classified as a book of mythology?
Since always. It has all the elements of a mythology, as I
have
already shown. The fact that you and others use that
mythology as
an
excuse for your "morals" and behavior does not change the fact
that
it
is a mythology.
The Bible is NOT classified as mythology.
Actually, it is. It fits the definition perfectly.
I understand mythology to be such as Roman and Greek
mythology.
Which have EXACTLY the same elements as the Bible. They are
both
an
ancient series of stories.
The Bible predates bioth Roman and Greek mythology.
So? That does not change the fact that it has the same elements
and
mechanisms as two religions that you call mythologies, and thus
is a
mythology.
They both center around supernatural
elements, beings, and heroes. They both try to teach a
culture
through
though allegory and impossible events. And they both draw on
even
older stories to explain what the respective cultures of the
time
did
not understand, usually erroneously.
Just as the ancient Greek and Roman religions are mythologies,
the
ancient Hebrew religion is a mythology, and for exactly the
same
reasons. How many people happen to believe in that mythology
does
not
change the fact that it is a mythology.
If you think that the Bible is true, then it is up to you
Sorry, bucko. You don't get the luzury of laying the burden of
proof
of the
Bibel in its entirety on me.
Yes, I do. You have made the affirmative assertion, that the
Bible is
fact, and a reasonable accurate history, and thus not a
mythology.
Therefore, it is up to you to prove it.
Actually, the fact that you and so many other atheist use this same
old
tired argument shows just how weak your argument is. You know, as
well as
I
know, that you nor any other atheist can not prove that God does
not
exist.
You know that, and it is frustrating that you nor any other atheist
can
prove that after death we don't have a soul that departs to another
dimension. You know that.
The fact that you and so many other atheist will avoid any type of
a
situation that places burden of proof on you shows just how weak
your
argument is.
<snip>
All whines cries and moans by you, barnes, and patrick go unheard and
unread
You have to wonder why Asspry continues to respond if this were true.
until you can stand up and apologize and admit to the MANY lies you
have
told about me in this newsgroup.
You guys are better off acting like children and crying to each other
and
talking about me, that is the only way your cries, whines, and moans
will
get read...that is by each other.
Except that you continue to read them and respond, dipshit.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Kansas Voters Tell Rightwing Anti-Gay Bigots To ***** Themselves. |
05 Mar 2005 04:12:00 PM |
|
|
On 5 Mar 2005 14:02:32 -0800, "Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote, akin
to the neighing and braying of farmyard animals:
Osprey wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:hq6k2190jljn7krss3n5ad9b397scmn5ed@4ax.com...
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 15:08:09 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote, akin to the neighing and braying of farmyard animals:
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1110050443.346949.100850@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1109979697.122661.302650@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1109910630.521738.256620@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk8y546p4w.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1109894492.855088.141490@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:6okd21lgks5t3q9nep9bot6mnlut40o8mr@4ax.com...
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 01:21:14 -0500, "Rev. Donald
Spitz"
<Glory2Jesus@ArmyofGod.com> in alt.abortion with
message-id
<y1yVd.35788$755.1063@lakeread05> wrote:
Controlled by sex perverted fags which the Bible
describes
as
being
reprobate.
Spitzie - why do you quote from your book of myth
before
you
prove it
is valid?
Why do you call it a myth without proving it is a
myth?
Because it fits the definition of a myth perfectly.
"A traditional, typically ancient story dealing with
supernatural
beings, ancestors, or heroes that serves as a
fundamental
type
in
the
worldview of a people, as by explaining aspects of the
natural
world or
delineating the psychology, customs, or ideals of
society"
The Bible is certainly "traditional" and "ancient
stories".
It
is
loaded with supernatural beings, ancestors, and
heroes. It
explains
provides a worldview of the a people by explaining
aspects
of
the
natural world and delineates the psychology, customs,
and
ideals
of a
society. It is loaded with magic and impossible
events and
feats.
Basically, it is obvious to anyone with a brain and an
education
that
it is a book of myths. It has been proven to be a
book of
myths
to you
in the past, but you are either too dishonest or to
stupid
to
remember.
I do not call it a book of myths. You do.
You're the one claiming it's true -- so where's your
proof,
Psycho
Boy?
I am asking for Proof from those who call it lies or myth.
Where did I claim it to be true?
You are assuming too much.
And you got it. Unfortunately, you cannot handle it.
Mark Sebree
You think you have proved that the Bible is a book of myths?
Yes.
When did the Bible become classified as a book of mythology?
Since always. It has all the elements of a mythology, as I
have
already shown. The fact that you and others use that
mythology as
an
excuse for your "morals" and behavior does not change the fact
that
it
is a mythology.
The Bible is NOT classified as mythology.
Actually, it is. It fits the definition perfectly.
I understand mythology to be such as Roman and Greek
mythology.
Which have EXACTLY the same elements as the Bible. They are
both
an
ancient series of stories.
The Bible predates bioth Roman and Greek mythology.
So? That does not change the fact that it has the same elements
and
mechanisms as two religions that you call mythologies, and thus
is a
mythology.
They both center around supernatural
elements, beings, and heroes. They both try to teach a
culture
through
though allegory and impossible events. And they both draw on
even
older stories to explain what the respective cultures of the
time
did
not understand, usually erroneously.
Just as the ancient Greek and Roman religions are mythologies,
the
ancient Hebrew religion is a mythology, and for exactly the
same
reasons. How many people happen to believe in that mythology
does
not
change the fact that it is a mythology.
If you think that the Bible is true, then it is up to you
Sorry, bucko. You don't get the luzury of laying the burden of
proof
of the
Bibel in its entirety on me.
Yes, I do. You have made the affirmative assertion, that the
Bible is
fact, and a reasonable accurate history, and thus not a
mythology.
Therefore, it is up to you to prove it.
Actually, the fact that you and so many other atheist use this same
old
tired argument shows just how weak your argument is. You know, as
well as
I
know, that you nor any other atheist can not prove that God does
not
exist.
You know that, and it is frustrating that you nor any other atheist
can
prove that after death we don't have a soul that departs to another
dimension. You know that.
The fact that you and so many other atheist will avoid any type of
a
situation that places burden of proof on you shows just how weak
your
argument is.
<snip>
All whines cries and moans by you, barnes, and patrick go unheard and
unread
You have to wonder why Asspry continues to respond if this were true.
until you can stand up and apologize and admit to the MANY lies you
have
told about me in this newsgroup.
You guys are better off acting like children and crying to each other
and
talking about me, that is the only way your cries, whines, and moans
will
get read...that is by each other.
Except that you continue to read them and respond, dipshit.
He's taken to this new tactic because he's gotten tired of being
intellectually burned. He can't support his claims with facts and he
knows it, so he's resorted to 'Na na na, I can't hear you'.
---
"Question with boldness even the existence of a god;
because, if there be one, he must more approve of
the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear."
- Thomas Jefferson
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Kansas Voters Tell Rightwing Anti-Gay Bigots To ***** Themselves. |
05 Mar 2005 04:38:00 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 15:08:09 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id <5dWdnYbEfPbijLffRVn-vQ@comcast.com>
wrote:
Yes, I do. You have made the affirmative assertion, that the Bible is
fact, and a reasonable accurate history, and thus not a mythology.
Therefore, it is up to you to prove it.
Actually, the fact that you and so many other atheist use this same old
tired argument shows just how weak your argument is. You know, as well as I
know, that you nor any other atheist can not prove that God does not exist.
I, for one, have never said that.
You know that, and it is frustrating that you nor any other atheist can
prove that after death we don't have a soul that departs to another
dimension. You know that.
I know no one has ever been able to prove a soul exists. I also know
it is not necessary to prove a negative, especially when the question
is one of existence or not.
The fact that you and so many other atheist will avoid any type of a
situation that places burden of proof on you shows just how weak your
argument is.
I can only speak for myself, but I tend not to make any claims I
cannot support except accidentally.
I do not claim there is no god. I do claim no one has ever been able
to produce any objective and unambiguous evidence of the existence of
any god.
The same can be said of werewolves, pixies, and (to date) space
aliens.
I believe in God, even though I can't sit here in a newsgroup and prove God
exist. It's called faith and I am perfectly fine accepting that.
Fine. The problem arises when you try to convince someone else tat
position is valid. Or when you use your religion to support a point
of view or position.
It appears that you and other atheist are the ones tormented simply because
you and so many others are on the attack against God and anyone who believes
in God.
Self defense. I do not want to live in a society predicated on some
religion.
And that is all I will say on the matter. I am perfectly fine with my faith.
To bad my faith and others bothers you so much.
As long as it does not become part of a discussion which treats it as
if it is fact, fine.
Don't ask and especially don't tell.
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Kansas Voters Tell Rightwing Anti-Gay Bigots To ***** Themselves. |
05 Mar 2005 07:04:40 PM |
|
|
Attila wrote:
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 15:08:09 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
in
alt.abortion with message-id <5dWdnYbEfPbijLffRVn-vQ@comcast.com>
wrote:
Yes, I do. You have made the affirmative assertion, that the
Bible is
fact, and a reasonable accurate history, and thus not a mythology.
Therefore, it is up to you to prove it.
Actually, the fact that you and so many other atheist use this same
old
tired argument shows just how weak your argument is. You know, as
well as I
know, that you nor any other atheist can not prove that God does not
exist.
I, for one, have never said that.
You know that, and it is frustrating that you nor any other atheist
can
prove that after death we don't have a soul that departs to another
dimension. You know that.
I know no one has ever been able to prove a soul exists. I also know
it is not necessary to prove a negative, especially when the question
is one of existence or not.
The fact that you and so many other atheist will avoid any type of a
situation that places burden of proof on you shows just how weak
your
argument is.
I can only speak for myself, but I tend not to make any claims I
cannot support except accidentally.
I do not claim there is no god. I do claim no one has ever been able
to produce any objective and unambiguous evidence of the existence of
any god.
The same can be said of werewolves, pixies, and (to date) space
aliens.
When the discussion involves werewolves, pixies, space aliens, or what
ever else..let me know. At this time, this discussion is not about the
above mentioned.
I believe in God, even though I can't sit here in a newsgroup and
prove God
exist. It's called faith and I am perfectly fine accepting that.
Fine. The problem arises when you try to convince someone else tat
position is valid. Or when you use your religion to support a point
of view or position.
Actually it isn't a problem, only to you maybe. If I choose to make
reference to something based on biblical scripture or my faith in God
and you choose not to accept it, fine. It isn't a problem unless you
make it a problem.
It appears that you and other atheist are the ones tormented simply
because
you and so many others are on the attack against God and anyone who
believes
in God.
Self defense. I do not want to live in a society predicated on some
religion.
Funny you should say "Self defense", I know many Christians who feel
they are only having to defend themselves now. It's funny how
Christian is attacked and anything that is "christian" must be removed
from the public but no one is saying anything about the "muslim"
religion.
There is so much hypocrisy in the argument of "freedom of religion" I
don't even know where to begin.
If you choose not to believe in God, fine. I choose to believe in God.
It doesn't mean I am any smarter or ignorant than you, and vice versa.
I know many highly intelligent people who believe in God, I also know
many who don't. Belief in God does not make up one's level of
intelligence as so many like to think.
Anyway, your point on self defense..I just found it ironic.
And that is all I will say on the matter. I am perfectly fine with
my faith.
To bad my faith and others bothers you so much.
As long as it does not become part of a discussion which treats it as
if it is fact, fine.
You don't decide how others will speak though.
Don't ask and especially don't tell.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Kansas Voters Tell Rightwing Anti-Gay Bigots To ***** Themselves. |
05 Mar 2005 08:25:03 PM |
|
|
On 5 Mar 2005 17:04:40 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1110071080.196412.187160@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 15:08:09 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
in
alt.abortion with message-id <5dWdnYbEfPbijLffRVn-vQ@comcast.com>
wrote:
Yes, I do. You have made the affirmative assertion, that the
Bible is
fact, and a reasonable accurate history, and thus not a mythology.
Therefore, it is up to you to prove it.
Actually, the fact that you and so many other atheist use this same
old
tired argument shows just how weak your argument is. You know, as
well as I
know, that you nor any other atheist can not prove that God does not
exist.
I, for one, have never said that.
You know that, and it is frustrating that you nor any other atheist
can
prove that after death we don't have a soul that departs to another
dimension. You know that.
I know no one has ever been able to prove a soul exists. I also know
it is not necessary to prove a negative, especially when the question
is one of existence or not.
The fact that you and so many other atheist will avoid any type of a
situation that places burden of proof on you shows just how weak
your
argument is.
I can only speak for myself, but I tend not to make any claims I
cannot support except accidentally.
I do not claim there is no god. I do claim no one has ever been able
to produce any objective and unambiguous evidence of the existence of
any god.
The same can be said of werewolves, pixies, and (to date) space
aliens.
When the discussion involves werewolves, pixies, space aliens, or what
ever else..let me know. At this time, this discussion is not about the
above mentioned.
I see you ignored the entire section about gods and the obvious lack
of evidence. That is what we are talking about.
I believe in God, even though I can't sit here in a newsgroup and
prove God
exist. It's called faith and I am perfectly fine accepting that.
Fine. The problem arises when you try to convince someone else tat
position is valid. Or when you use your religion to support a point
of view or position.
Actually it isn't a problem, only to you maybe. If I choose to make
reference to something based on biblical scripture or my faith in God
and you choose not to accept it, fine. It isn't a problem unless you
make it a problem.
You can make reference to being kidnapped by space aliens with the
same credibility. Why is religion supposed to be exempt from normal
expectations?
It appears that you and other atheist are the ones tormented simply
because
you and so many others are on the attack against God and anyone who
believes
in God.
Self defense. I do not want to live in a society predicated on some
religion.
Funny you should say "Self defense", I know many Christians who feel
they are only having to defend themselves now.
Too bad. If they don't lead with their chin no one would know or care
what their religion is. If they bring it up i public expect bricks.
It's funny how
Christian is attacked and anything that is "christian" must be removed
from the public but no one is saying anything about the "muslim"
religion.
Wrong. Remove that too.
There is so much hypocrisy in the argument of "freedom of religion" I
don't even know where to begin.
No, there is also freedom from religion - which some people cannot
understand.
If you choose not to believe in God, fine. I choose to believe in God.
Then keep it to yourself.
It doesn't mean I am any smarter or ignorant than you, and vice versa.
I know many highly intelligent people who believe in God, I also know
many who don't. Belief in God does not make up one's level of
intelligence as so many like to think.
That is a matter of opinion, but if people kept their religion to
themselves who would know or care?
Anyway, your point on self defense..I just found it ironic.
Against those who for some reason insist on making their religion
public.
And that is all I will say on the matter. I am perfectly fine with
my faith.
To bad my faith and others bothers you so much.
As long as it does not become part of a discussion which treats it as
if it is fact, fine.
You don't decide how others will speak though.
Don't ask and especially don't tell.
Your filters are screwed up. You are responding to me and you are not
supposed to do that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Kansas Voters Tell Rightwing Anti-Gay Bigots To ***** Themselves. |
05 Mar 2005 11:15:01 PM |
|
|
Attila wrote:
On 5 Mar 2005 17:04:40 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1110071080.196412.187160@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 15:08:09 -0500, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
in
alt.abortion with message-id <5dWdnYbEfPbijLffRVn-vQ@comcast.com>
wrote:
Yes, I do. You have made the affirmative assertion, that the
Bible is
fact, and a reasonable accurate history, and thus not a
mythology.
Therefore, it is up to you to prove it.
Actually, the fact that you and so many other atheist use this
same
old
tired argument shows just how weak your argument is. You know, as
well as I
know, that you nor any other atheist can not prove that God does
not
exist.
I, for one, have never said that.
You know that, and it is frustrating that you nor any other
atheist
can
prove that after death we don't have a soul that departs to
another
dimension. You know that.
I know no one has ever been able to prove a soul exists. I also
know
it is not necessary to prove a negative, especially when the
question
is one of existence or not.
The fact that you and so many other atheist will avoid any type
of a
situation that places burden of proof on you shows just how weak
your
argument is.
I can only speak for myself, but I tend not to make any claims I
cannot support except accidentally.
I do not claim there is no god. I do claim no one has ever been
able
to produce any objective and unambiguous evidence of the existence
of
any god.
The same can be said of werewolves, pixies, and (to date) space
aliens.
When the discussion involves werewolves, pixies, space aliens, or
what
ever else..let me know. At this time, this discussion is not about
the
above mentioned.
I see you ignored the entire section about gods and the obvious lack
of evidence. That is what we are talking about.
Because I choose to not get into a argument on gods, evidence of or
lack of. It is a stupid argument, it goes round and round and there is
never any conclusion. If you choose to not believe in God, that is
your choice. I choose to believe in God and I will have no problem
stating it. I will not allow someone to debate my choice, simple as
that. My faith is not up for discussion.
I believe in God, even though I can't sit here in a newsgroup and
prove God
exist. It's called faith and I am perfectly fine accepting that.
Fine. The problem arises when you try to convince someone else
tat
position is valid. Or when you use your religion to support a
point
of view or position.
Actually it isn't a problem, only to you maybe. If I choose to make
reference to something based on biblical scripture or my faith in
God
and you choose not to accept it, fine. It isn't a problem unless
you
make it a problem.
You can make reference to being kidnapped by space aliens with the
same credibility. Why is religion supposed to be exempt from normal
expectations?
Read above. If you have a problem with my saying God exist or anyone
else saying it, it is "your" problem. You deal with it. My faith in
God is not subject to debate. Simple as that. It is a pointless and
stupid argument, it comes down to faith and belief.
It appears that you and other atheist are the ones tormented
simply
because
you and so many others are on the attack against God and anyone
who
believes
in God.
Self defense. I do not want to live in a society predicated on
some
religion.
Funny you should say "Self defense", I know many Christians who feel
they are only having to defend themselves now.
Too bad. If they don't lead with their chin no one would know or
care
what their religion is. If they bring it up i public expect bricks.
It's funny how
Christian is attacked and anything that is "christian" must be
removed
from the public but no one is saying anything about the "muslim"
religion.
Wrong. Remove that too.
There is so much hypocrisy in the argument of "freedom of religion"
I
don't even know where to begin.
No, there is also freedom from religion - which some people cannot
understand.
If you choose not to believe in God, fine. I choose to believe in
God.
Then keep it to yourself.
No, sorry you don't have control over that.
It's funny how you will say that but I bet you that if someone objected
to homosexuality or other sensitive issues and said "keep it to
yourself" you would object strongly to that. That is part of the
hypocrisy I am talking about.
Should we tell you to keep your "atheism" to yourself?
Take a long hard look at what you are saying and hopefully you will see
how silly it sounds.
I could also remind you of the 1st ammendment, but we don't need to go
through that do we?
It doesn't mean I am any smarter or ignorant than you, and vice
versa.
I know many highly intelligent people who believe in God, I also
know
many who don't. Belief in God does not make up one's level of
intelligence as so many like to think.
That is a matter of opinion,
No, it's a matter of fact actually.
but if people kept their religion to
themselves who would know or care?
You do realize you are no better than those who tell others to keep
their homosexuality to themselves right? You are on the borderline of
serious discrimination and bigotry.
I will remind you...1st ammendment
Anyway, your point on self defense..I just found it ironic.
Against those who for some reason insist on making their religion
public.
If I choose to pray in public, you have the freedom to walk around or
by me. Same for anyone else. There is nothing you can do about it and
nothing you will do about it. I personally don't go around praying in
public but if I did, and you tried to stop me I can guarentee you I
would fight for my freedom of speech and you most likely would not be
happy with the outcome. So the best advice I could give you is to live
and let live. Live your life the way you want to, I will live my life
how I want to. Simple as that.
You will not keep people locked up in the closet because you don't like
what they believe.
And that is all I will say on the matter. I am perfectly fine
with
my faith.
To bad my faith and others bothers you so much.
As long as it does not become part of a discussion which treats it
as
if it is fact, fine.
You don't decide how others will speak though.
Don't ask and especially don't tell.
Your filters are screwed up. You are responding to me and you are
not
supposed to do that.
No one asked you to read it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Kansas Voters Tell Rightwing Anti-Gay Bigots To ***** Themselves. |
05 Mar 2005 11:48:27 PM |
|
|
In article <1110086101.444427.201010@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
On 5 Mar 2005 17:04:40 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1110071080.196412.187160@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 15:08:09 -0500, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
in
alt.abortion with message-id <5dWdnYbEfPbijLffRVn-vQ@comcast.com>
wrote:
Yes, I do. You have made the affirmative assertion, that the
Bible is
fact, and a reasonable accurate history, and thus not a
mythology.
Therefore, it is up to you to prove it.
Actually, the fact that you and so many other atheist use this
same
old
tired argument shows just how weak your argument is. You know, as
well as I
know, that you nor any other atheist can not prove that God does
not
exist.
I, for one, have never said that.
You know that, and it is frustrating that you nor any other
atheist
can
prove that after death we don't have a soul that departs to
another
dimension. You know that.
I know no one has ever been able to prove a soul exists. I also
know
it is not necessary to prove a negative, especially when the
question
is one of existence or not.
The fact that you and so many other atheist will avoid any type
of a
situation that places burden of proof on you shows just how weak
your
argument is.
I can only speak for myself, but I tend not to make any claims I
cannot support except accidentally.
I do not claim there is no god. I do claim no one has ever been
able
to produce any objective and unambiguous evidence of the existence
of
any god.
The same can be said of werewolves, pixies, and (to date) space
aliens.
When the discussion involves werewolves, pixies, space aliens, or
what
ever else..let me know. At this time, this discussion is not about
the
above mentioned.
I see you ignored the entire section about gods and the obvious lack
of evidence. That is what we are talking about.
Because I choose to not get into a argument on gods, evidence of or
lack of.
More excuses from Osprey. He "chooses not to" back up his *****.
Maybe you should demand he apologize first?
It is a stupid argument, it goes round and round and there is
never any conclusion.
Of course there is. You just can't accept it.
If you choose to not believe in God, that is
your choice. I choose to believe in God and I will have no problem
stating it. I will not allow someone to debate my choice, simple as
that. My faith is not up for discussion.
ROFLMAO!!!! Well - it's good for a person to know his limitations.
I believe in God, even though I can't sit here in a newsgroup and
prove God
exist. It's called faith and I am perfectly fine accepting that.
Fine. The problem arises when you try to convince someone else
tat
position is valid. Or when you use your religion to support a
point
of view or position.
Actually it isn't a problem, only to you maybe. If I choose to make
reference to something based on biblical scripture or my faith in
God
and you choose not to accept it, fine. It isn't a problem unless
you
make it a problem.
You can make reference to being kidnapped by space aliens with the
same credibility. Why is religion supposed to be exempt from normal
expectations?
Read above. If you have a problem with my saying God exist or anyone
else saying it, it is "your" problem. You deal with it.
In other words, it isn't any different and you can't back up your
beliefs. But you choose to believe anyway. That makes you a MORON.
My faith in
God is not subject to debate. Simple as that.
ROFL!! Stop! Is there blood on my shirt? Because you're killing me!
It is a pointless and
stupid argument, it comes down to faith and belief.
So how do you choose what to believe in without proof? (This always
get them...)
It appears that you and other atheist are the ones tormented
simply
because
you and so many others are on the attack against God and anyone
who
believes
in God.
Self defense. I do not want to live in a society predicated on
some
religion.
Funny you should say "Self defense", I know many Christians who feel
they are only having to defend themselves now.
Too bad. If they don't lead with their chin no one would know or
care
what their religion is. If they bring it up i public expect bricks.
It's funny how
Christian is attacked and anything that is "christian" must be
removed
from the public but no one is saying anything about the "muslim"
religion.
Wrong. Remove that too.
There is so much hypocrisy in the argument of "freedom of religion"
I
don't even know where to begin.
No, there is also freedom from religion - which some people cannot
understand.
If you choose not to believe in God, fine. I choose to believe in
God.
Then keep it to yourself.
No, sorry you don't have control over that.
It's funny how you will say that but I bet you that if someone objected
to homosexuality or other sensitive issues and said "keep it to
yourself" you would object strongly to that. That is part of the
hypocrisy I am talking about.
Should we tell you to keep your "atheism" to yourself?
Take a long hard look at what you are saying and hopefully you will see
how silly it sounds.
I could also remind you of the 1st ammendment, but we don't need to go
through that do we?
What the hell would a guard know about the 1st amendment?
It doesn't mean I am any smarter or ignorant than you, and vice
versa.
I know many highly intelligent people who believe in God, I also
know
many who don't. Belief in God does not make up one's level of
intelligence as so many like to think.
That is a matter of opinion,
No, it's a matter of fact actually.
No - it is a matter of opinion. And you can't seem to prove otherwise.
but if people kept their religion to
themselves who would know or care?
You do realize you are no better than those who tell others to keep
their homosexuality to themselves right? You are on the borderline of
serious discrimination and bigotry.
I will remind you...1st ammendment
Is that the way it's spelled?
<Yawn> Bored...
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Kansas Voters Tell Rightwing Anti-Gay Bigots To ***** Themselves. |
06 Mar 2005 12:05:33 AM |
|
|
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1110086101.444427.201010@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
On 5 Mar 2005 17:04:40 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1110071080.196412.187160@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 15:08:09 -0500, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
in
alt.abortion with message-id
<5dWdnYbEfPbijLffRVn-vQ@comcast.com>
wrote:
Yes, I do. You have made the affirmative assertion, that
the
Bible is
fact, and a reasonable accurate history, and thus not a
mythology.
Therefore, it is up to you to prove it.
Actually, the fact that you and so many other atheist use
this
same
old
tired argument shows just how weak your argument is. You
know, as
well as I
know, that you nor any other atheist can not prove that God
does
not
exist.
I, for one, have never said that.
You know that, and it is frustrating that you nor any other
atheist
can
prove that after death we don't have a soul that departs to
another
dimension. You know that.
I know no one has ever been able to prove a soul exists. I
also
know
it is not necessary to prove a negative, especially when the
question
is one of existence or not.
The fact that you and so many other atheist will avoid any
type
of a
situation that places burden of proof on you shows just how
weak
your
argument is.
I can only speak for myself, but I tend not to make any claims
I
cannot support except accidentally.
I do not claim there is no god. I do claim no one has ever
been
able
to produce any objective and unambiguous evidence of the
existence
of
any god.
The same can be said of werewolves, pixies, and (to date)
space
aliens.
When the discussion involves werewolves, pixies, space aliens,
or
what
ever else..let me know. At this time, this discussion is not
about
the
above mentioned.
I see you ignored the entire section about gods and the obvious
lack
of evidence. That is what we are talking about.
Because I choose to not get into a argument on gods, evidence of or
lack of.
<snip>
Can't give barnes any credit for having brains. Numerous times he is
told there will be no discussion until he can show he is man enough to
admit to his lies he has told about me and apologize. Yet he continues
to think ... wait...barnes..think??? no, those two words don't go
together. He continues to try, but has to be reminded.
barnes, you want to discuss an issue? you know what you have to do.
Admit to your lies and be a man and apologize. We can discuss issues
from that point on and start a new beginning. Not until then. I am not
afraid of you, I was prepared to face you numerous times and you were a
no show. So if you want to show you are not afraid, own up to your
lies, act like an adult, apologize and we can move on. For the record,
your denial and avoidance to be a man and do the right thing only shows
you to be the coward.
If you can't do that, keep crying to patty and adam. They are the only
ones paying you any attention.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Kansas Voters Tell Rightwing Anti-Gay Bigots To ***** Themselves. |
06 Mar 2005 12:23:35 AM |
|
|
In article <1110089133.896593.269260@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1110086101.444427.201010@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
On 5 Mar 2005 17:04:40 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1110071080.196412.187160@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 15:08:09 -0500, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
in
alt.abortion with message-id
<5dWdnYbEfPbijLffRVn-vQ@comcast.com>
wrote:
Yes, I do. You have made the affirmative assertion, that
the
Bible is
fact, and a reasonable accurate history, and thus not a
mythology.
Therefore, it is up to you to prove it.
Actually, the fact that you and so many other atheist use
this
same
old
tired argument shows just how weak your argument is. You
know, as
well as I
know, that you nor any other atheist can not prove that God
does
not
exist.
I, for one, have never said that.
You know that, and it is frustrating that you nor any other
atheist
can
prove that after death we don't have a soul that departs to
another
dimension. You know that.
I know no one has ever been able to prove a soul exists. I
also
know
it is not necessary to prove a negative, especially when the
question
is one of existence or not.
The fact that you and so many other atheist will avoid any
type
of a
situation that places burden of proof on you shows just how
weak
your
argument is.
I can only speak for myself, but I tend not to make any claims
I
cannot support except accidentally.
I do not claim there is no god. I do claim no one has ever
been
able
to produce any objective and unambiguous evidence of the
existence
of
any god.
The same can be said of werewolves, pixies, and (to date)
space
aliens.
When the discussion involves werewolves, pixies, space aliens,
or
what
ever else..let me know. At this time, this discussion is not
about
the
above mentioned.
I see you ignored the entire section about gods and the obvious
lack
of evidence. That is what we are talking about.
Because I choose to not get into a argument on gods, evidence of or
lack of.
<snip>
Can't give barnes any credit for having brains. Numerous times he is
told there will be no discussion until he can show he is man enough to
admit to his lies he has told about me and apologize. Yet he continues
to think ... wait...barnes..think??? no, those two words don't go
together. He continues to try, but has to be reminded.
barnes, you want to discuss an issue? you know what you have to do.
Admit to your lies and be a man and apologize. We can discuss issues
from that point on and start a new beginning. Not until then. I am not
afraid of you, I was prepared to face you numerous times and you were a
no show. So if you want to show you are not afraid, own up to your
lies, act like an adult, apologize and we can move on. For the record,
your denial and avoidance to be a man and do the right thing only shows
you to be the coward.
If you can't do that, keep crying to patty and adam. They are the only
ones paying you any attention.
Yeah - boy. I'll bet you'd really kick our asses if it wasn't for that
damn rule that says you can't do so unless we "apologize for our lies"
first. You know? Damn. I mean - it isn't that you are an ignorant
coward - you could just kick the crap out us. We all really see that
about you. But, damn. That rule - boy. All that intellect of yours
going to waste - all because we aren't willing to say we agree that you
are right, first. Those rules are there to be followed though - I
understand. Shoot....
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Kansas Voters Tell Rightwing Anti-Gay Bigots To ***** Themselves. |
07 Mar 2005 04:22:51 PM |
|
|
Maybe not, we know what the Holy Bible says about homosexuals who are
sexual deviants.
Leviticus 18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it
is abomination.
Leviticus 20:13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a
woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be
put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
Romans 1:22-27
V22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, V23 And
changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to
corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping
things.
V24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of
their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
V25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served
the creature more than the Creator, Who is blessed for ever. Amen.
V26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even
their women did change the natural use into that which is against
nature:
V27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman,
burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that
which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their
error which was meet.
1 Timothy 1:8-10
V8 But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully;
V9 Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for
the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for
unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers,
for manslayers,
V10 For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for
menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other
thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;
1 Corinthians 6:9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit
the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor
idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves
with mankind,
SAY THIS PRAYER: Dear Jesus, I am a sinner and am headed to eternal
hell because of my sins. I believe you died on the cross to take away
my sins and to take me to heaven. Jesus, I ask you now to come into my
heart and take away my sins and give me eternal life.
http://www.ArmyofGod.com
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1110089133.896593.269260@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article
<1110086101.444427.201010@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
On 5 Mar 2005 17:04:40 -0800, "osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1110071080.196412.187160@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
wrote:
Attila wrote:
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 15:08:09 -0500, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
in
alt.abortion with message-id
<5dWdnYbEfPbijLffRVn-vQ@comcast.com>
wrote:
Yes, I do. You have made the affirmative assertion,
that
the
Bible is
fact, and a reasonable accurate history, and thus not a
mythology.
Therefore, it is up to you to prove it.
Actually, the fact that you and so many other atheist use
this
same
old
tired argument shows just how weak your argument is. You
know, as
well as I
know, that you nor any other atheist can not prove that
God
does
not
exist.
I, for one, have never said that.
You know that, and it is frustrating that you nor any
other
atheist
can
prove that after death we don't have a soul that departs
to
another
dimension. You know that.
I know no one has ever been able to prove a soul exists.
I
also
know
it is not necessary to prove a negative, especially when
the
question
is one of existence or not.
The fact that you and so many other atheist will avoid
any
type
of a
situation that places burden of proof on you shows just
how
weak
your
argument is.
I can only speak for myself, but I tend not to make any
claims
I
cannot support except accidentally.
I do not claim there is no god. I do claim no one has
ever
been
able
to produce any objective and unambiguous evidence of the
existence
of
any god.
The same can be said of werewolves, pixies, and (to date)
space
aliens.
When the discussion involves werewolves, pixies, space
aliens,
or
what
ever else..let me know. At this time, this discussion is not
about
the
above mentioned.
I see you ignored the entire section about gods and the
obvious
lack
of evidence. That is what we are talking about.
Because I choose to not get into a argument on gods, evidence
of or
lack of.
<snip>
Can't give barnes any credit for having brains. Numerous times he
is
told there will be no discussion until he can show he is man enough
to
admit to his lies he has told about me and apologize. Yet he
continues
to think ... wait...barnes..think??? no, those two words don't go
together. He continues to try, but has to be reminded.
barnes, you want to discuss an issue? you know what you have to
do.
Admit to your lies and be a man and apologize. We can discuss
issues
from that point on and start a new beginning. Not until then. I am
not
afraid of you, I was prepared to face you numerous times and you
were a
no show. So if you want to show you are not afraid, own up to your
lies, act like an adult, apologize and we can move on. For the
record,
your denial and avoidance to be a man and do the right thing only
shows
you to be the coward.
If you can't do that, keep crying to patty and adam. They are the
only
ones paying you any attention.
Yeah - boy. I'll bet you'd really kick our asses if it wasn't for
that
damn rule that says you can't do so unless we "apologize for our
lies"
first. You know? Damn. I mean - it isn't that you are an ignorant
coward - you could just kick the crap out us. We all really see that
about you. But, damn. That rule - boy. All that intellect of yours
going to waste - all because we aren't willing to say we agree that
you
are right, first. Those rules are there to be followed though - I
understand. Shoot....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. Karl E. Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: Kansas Voters Tell Rightwing Anti-Gay Bigots To ***** Themselves. |
07 Mar 2005 09:09:42 PM |
|
|
wrote:
<Nothing of value>
Hey, Don Shitz.
Matters not what name you post under. Your bigotry and hatred are
clear, for everyone to see.
Ordered the shooting of any doctors lately? How about maiming a few
nurses, Hmmmmm?
***** and die, Don. You are a pile of *****.
--
There are none more ignorant and useless,
than they that seek answers on their knees,
with their eyes closed.
____________________________________________________________________
Rev. Karl E. Taylor
A.A #1143 PLONKED by Bob
Apostle of Dr. Lao EAC: Virgin Conversion Unit Director
____________________________________________________________________
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Kansas Voters Tell Rightwing Anti-Gay Bigots To ***** Themselves. |
07 Mar 2005 09:17:15 PM |
|
|
In article <1110234171.172197.286020@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
<Glory2Jesus@ArmyofGod.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1110089133.896593.269260@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article
<1110086101.444427.201010@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
On 5 Mar 2005 17:04:40 -0800, "osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1110071080.196412.187160@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
wrote:
Attila wrote:
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 15:08:09 -0500, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
in
alt.abortion with message-id
<5dWdnYbEfPbijLffRVn-vQ@comcast.com>
wrote:
Yes, I do. You have made the affirmative assertion,
that
the
Bible is
fact, and a reasonable accurate history, and thus not a
mythology.
Therefore, it is up to you to prove it.
Actually, the fact that you and so many other atheist use
this
same
old
tired argument shows just how weak your argument is. You
know, as
well as I
know, that you nor any other atheist can not prove that
God
does
not
exist.
I, for one, have never said that.
You know that, and it is frustrating that you nor any
other
atheist
can
prove that after death we don't have a soul that departs
to
another
dimension. You know that.
I know no one has ever been able to prove a soul exists.
I
also
know
it is not necessary to prove a negative, especially when
the
question
is one of existence or not.
The fact that you and so many other atheist will avoid
any
type
of a
situation that places burden of proof on you shows just
how
weak
your
argument is.
I can only speak for myself, but I tend not to make any
claims
I
cannot support except accidentally.
I do not claim there is no god. I do claim no one has
ever
been
able
to produce any objective and unambiguous evidence of the
existence
of
any god.
The same can be said of werewolves, pixies, and (to date)
space
aliens.
When the discussion involves werewolves, pixies, space
aliens,
or
what
ever else..let me know. At this time, this discussion is not
about
the
above mentioned.
I see you ignored the entire section about gods and the
obvious
lack
of evidence. That is what we are talking about.
Because I choose to not get into a argument on gods, evidence
of or
lack of.
<snip>
Can't give barnes any credit for having brains. Numerous times he
is
told there will be no discussion until he can show he is man enough
to
admit to his lies he has told about me and apologize. Yet he
continues
to think ... wait...barnes..think??? no, those two words don't go
together. He continues to try, but has to be reminded.
barnes, you want to discuss an issue? you know what you have to
do.
Admit to your lies and be a man and apologize. We can discuss
issues
from that point on and start a new beginning. Not until then. I am
not
afraid of you, I was prepared to face you numerous times and you
were a
no show. So if you want to show you are not afraid, own up to your
lies, act like an adult, apologize and we can move on. For the
record,
your denial and avoidance to be a man and do the right thing only
shows
you to be the coward.
If you can't do that, keep crying to patty and adam. They are the
only
ones paying you any attention.
Yeah - boy. I'll bet you'd really kick our asses if it wasn't for
that
damn rule that says you can't do so unless we "apologize for our
lies"
first. You know? Damn. I mean - it isn't that you are an ignorant
coward - you could just kick the crap out us. We all really see that
about you. But, damn. That rule - boy. All that intellect of yours
going to waste - all because we aren't willing to say we agree that
you
are right, first. Those rules are there to be followed though - I
understand. Shoot....
Maybe not, we know what the Holy Bible says about homosexuals who are
sexual deviants.
Leviticus 18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it
is abomination.
Leviticus 20:13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a
woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be
put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
Romans 1:22-27
V22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, V23 And
changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to
corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping
things.
V24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of
their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
V25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served
the creature more than the Creator, Who is blessed for ever. Amen.
V26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even
their women did change the natural use into that which is against
nature:
V27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman,
burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that
which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their
error which was meet.
1 Timothy 1:8-10
V8 But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully;
V9 Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for
the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for
unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers,
for manslayers,
V10 For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for
menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other
thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;
1 Corinthians 6:9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit
the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor
idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves
with mankind,
SAY THIS PRAYER: Dear Jesus, I am a sinner and am headed to eternal
hell because of my sins. I believe you died on the cross to take away
my sins and to take me to heaven. Jesus, I ask you now to come into my
heart and take away my sins and give me eternal life.
http://www.ArmyofGod.com
What is with the Top Posting?
The Bible means nothing. Why should we believe anything in it?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- On 1/20/09, itll be BYE-BYE Bushie! Then, GOOD RIDDANCE!" |
|
| Title: Re: Kansas Voters Tell Rightwing Anti-Gay Bigots To ***** Themselves. |
07 Mar 2005 08:46:22 PM |
|
|
On 7 Mar 2005 14:22:51 -0800,
Clueless & Bigoted IRRev.Spitz
[<Glory2SATAN@ArmyofLOSERS.com>]
spewed a crapload of HATE-swill, starting with...
...we know what the Holy Bible says about homosexuals...
Far MORE important, we know whot it says about
clueless, hateful, and loathsome control-freaks like YOU:
Matthew 7:1-5 (KJV)
1 Judge not, that ye be not judged.
2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged:
and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured
to you again.
3 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's
eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
4 Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote
out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?
5 Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye;
and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of
thy brother's eye.
Get lost, Spitz. You have NO credibility, and are one of the
biggest **losers** on Usenet.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Kansas Voters Tell Rightwing Anti-Gay Bigots To ***** Themselves. |
07 Mar 2005 06:46:53 PM |
|
|
On 7 Mar 2005 14:22:51 -0800, drained his
beer, leaned back in the alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly proclaimed
the following
Maybe not, we know what the Holy Bible says about homosexuals who are
sexual deviants.
Leviticus 18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it
is abomination.
Leviticus 20:13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a
woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be
put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
Do you follow *all* the laws in Leviticus?
Romans 1:22-27
V22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, V23 And
changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to
corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping
things.
V24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of
their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
So, God created gays!
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Kansas Voters Tell Rightwing Anti-Gay Bigots To ***** Themselves. |
07 Mar 2005 06:47:36 PM |
|
|
On 7 Mar 2005 14:22:51 -0800, in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1110234171.172197.286020@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1110089133.896593.269260@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article
<1110086101.444427.201010@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
On 5 Mar 2005 17:04:40 -0800, "osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1110071080.196412.187160@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
wrote:
Attila wrote:
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 15:08:09 -0500, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
in
alt.abortion with message-id
<5dWdnYbEfPbijLffRVn-vQ@comcast.com>
wrote:
Yes, I do. You have made the affirmative assertion,
that
the
Bible is
fact, and a reasonable accurate history, and thus not a
mythology.
Therefore, it is up to you to prove it.
Actually, the fact that you and so many other atheist use
this
same
old
tired argument shows just how weak your argument is. You
know, as
well as I
know, that you nor any other atheist can not prove that
God
does
not
exist.
I, for one, have never said that.
You know that, and it is frustrating that you nor any
other
atheist
can
prove that after death we don't have a soul that departs
to
another
dimension. You know that.
I know no one has ever been able to prove a soul exists.
I
also
know
it is not necessary to prove a negative, especially when
the
question
is one of existence or not.
The fact that you and so many other atheist will avoid
any
type
of a
situation that places burden of proof on you shows just
how
weak
your
argument is.
I can only speak for myself, but I tend not to make any
claims
I
cannot support except accidentally.
I do not claim there is no god. I do claim no one has
ever
been
able
to produce any objective and unambiguous evidence of the
existence
of
any god.
The same can be said of werewolves, pixies, and (to date)
space
aliens.
When the discussion involves werewolves, pixies, space
aliens,
or
what
ever else..let me know. At this time, this discussion is not
about
the
above mentioned.
I see you ignored the entire section about gods and the
obvious
lack
of evidence. That is what we are talking about.
Because I choose to not get into a argument on gods, evidence
of or
lack of.
<snip>
Can't give barnes any credit for having brains. Numerous times he
is
told there will be no discussion until he can show he is man enough
to
admit to his lies he has told about me and apologize. Yet he
continues
to think ... wait...barnes..think??? no, those two words don't go
together. He continues to try, but has to be reminded.
barnes, you want to discuss an issue? you know what you have to
do.
Admit to your lies and be a man and apologize. We can discuss
issues
from that point on and start a new beginning. Not until then. I am
not
afraid of you, I was prepared to face you numerous times and you
were a
no show. So if you want to show you are not afraid, own up to your
lies, act like an adult, apologize and we can move on. For the
record,
your denial and avoidance to be a man and do the right thing only
shows
you to be the coward.
If you can't do that, keep crying to patty and adam. They are the
only
ones paying you any attention.
Yeah - boy. I'll bet you'd really kick our asses if it wasn't for
that
damn rule that says you can't do so unless we "apologize for our
lies"
first. You know? Damn. I mean - it isn't that you are an ignorant
coward - you could just kick the crap out us. We all really see that
about you. But, damn. That rule - boy. All that intellect of yours
going to waste - all because we aren't willing to say we agree that
you
are right, first. Those rules are there to be followed though - I
understand. Shoot....
Maybe not, we know what the Holy Bible says about homosexuals who are
sexual deviants.
I have clipped your response because you have not validated your
source.
Prove it contains any truth.
What is Top-Posting and why is it considered bad?
http://www.dickalba.demon.co.uk/usenet/guide/faq_topp.html
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | |