| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Greywolf" |
| Date: |
09 May 2007 10:55:30 PM |
| Object: |
Kirk Cameron: One Time 'Atheist'! |
Well when one is a former 'atheist' it is rather easy to defeat atheists in
a 'scientific' debate regarding the existence of 'God', is it not? Like
shooting fish in a barrel, one would think.
Sounded as though he did rather well minutes ago on 'The O'Reilly Factor'.
Maybe as well as O'Reilly did himself when Mr. 'I Can't Figure Out How One
Brain Can Contain So Much Smarts' 'beat' Richard Dawkins in their classic
'have at it'. At least 'Bill' seems to think he did. He just punched holes
in the 'Big Bang' argument, you know.
Wonder how Cameron will do in tonight's debate. It's just minutes away for
me out here.
Kirk Cameron the onetime 'atheist'.
I wonder: Did he ever make his 'atheism' known to any one other than
himself?
Greywolf
.
|
|
| User: "Ash" |
|
| Title: Re: Kirk Cameron: One Time 'Atheist'! |
10 May 2007 03:52:02 PM |
|
|
Greywolf wrote:
Well when one is a former 'atheist' it is rather easy to defeat atheists in
a 'scientific' debate regarding the existence of 'God', is it not? Like
shooting fish in a barrel, one would think.
Sounded as though he did rather well minutes ago on 'The O'Reilly Factor'.
Maybe as well as O'Reilly did himself when Mr. 'I Can't Figure Out How One
Brain Can Contain So Much Smarts' 'beat' Richard Dawkins in their classic
'have at it'. At least 'Bill' seems to think he did. He just punched holes
in the 'Big Bang' argument, you know.
Wonder how Cameron will do in tonight's debate. It's just minutes away for
me out here.
Kirk Cameron the onetime 'atheist'.
I wonder: Did he ever make his 'atheism' known to any one other than
himself?
Greywolf
He probably told God
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Thurisaz, Germanic barbarian" |
|
| Title: Re: Kirk Cameron: One Time 'Atheist'! |
09 May 2007 11:24:55 PM |
|
|
Greywolf:
I wonder: Did he ever make his 'atheism' known to any one other than
himself?
I'd rather wonder if there's even a shred of truth in that statement.
After all, so far all self-proclaimed ex-atheists, ex-evolutionists,
ex-homosexuals et cetera I'v ever heard from had soooo totally no idea of
what they claim to have been that somehow, just somehow, I doubt that even
a single one of them tells the truth...
Aaah, don't we all know those claims? "I've been an athiest[sic] myself,I
believed there are no morals and everything is okay...", "I once was an
evilutionist[sic] and really believed that nothing exploded to create the
world" et cetera ad nauseam...?
--
"To his friend a man a friend shall prove, and gifts with gifts requite;
But men shall mocking with mockery answer, and fraud with falsehood meet."
(The Poetic Edda)
Must have been written with fundies in mind...
My personal judgment of monotheism:
http://www.carcosa.de/nojebus
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "jcon" |
|
| Title: Re: Kirk Cameron: One Time 'Atheist'! |
10 May 2007 07:47:07 AM |
|
|
On May 9, 10:55 pm, "Greywolf" <greyw...@cybrzn.com> wrote:
Well when one is a former 'atheist' it is rather easy to defeat atheists in
a 'scientific' debate regarding the existence of 'God', is it not? Like
shooting fish in a barrel, one would think.
Sounded as though he did rather well minutes ago on 'The O'Reilly Factor'.
Maybe as well as O'Reilly did himself when Mr. 'I Can't Figure Out How One
Brain Can Contain So Much Smarts' 'beat' Richard Dawkins in their classic
'have at it'. At least 'Bill' seems to think he did. He just punched holes
in the 'Big Bang' argument, you know.
Wonder how Cameron will do in tonight's debate. It's just minutes away for
me out here.
Kirk Cameron the onetime 'atheist'.
Why couldn't he just develop a drug problem like a *normal*
washed up child star?
-jc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Greywolf" |
|
| Title: Re: Kirk Cameron: One Time 'Atheist'! |
10 May 2007 11:18:09 AM |
|
|
"jcon" <cirejcon@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1178801227.299099.240520@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
On May 9, 10:55 pm, "Greywolf" <greyw...@cybrzn.com> wrote:
Well when one is a former 'atheist' it is rather easy to defeat atheists
in
a 'scientific' debate regarding the existence of 'God', is it not? Like
shooting fish in a barrel, one would think.
Sounded as though he did rather well minutes ago on 'The O'Reilly
Factor'.
Maybe as well as O'Reilly did himself when Mr. 'I Can't Figure Out How
One
Brain Can Contain So Much Smarts' 'beat' Richard Dawkins in their classic
'have at it'. At least 'Bill' seems to think he did. He just punched
holes
in the 'Big Bang' argument, you know.
Wonder how Cameron will do in tonight's debate. It's just minutes away
for
me out here.
Kirk Cameron the onetime 'atheist'.
Why couldn't he just develop a drug problem like a *normal*
washed up child star?
-jc
He did: The infamous 'Opiate of the masses'. Instead of cocaine, heroin or
alcohol, Kirk got addicted to 'Jesus'. (Just as difficult a 'habit' to break
and remain 'clean' as the others from what I hear.)
Greywolf
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Kirk Cameron: One Time 'Atheist'! |
10 May 2007 03:16:23 PM |
|
|
"Greywolf" <greywolf@cybrzn.com> wrote in message
news:1346he9s6lg2h6b@corp.supernews.com...
"jcon" <cirejcon@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1178801227.299099.240520@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
On May 9, 10:55 pm, "Greywolf" <greyw...@cybrzn.com> wrote:
Well when one is a former 'atheist' it is rather easy to defeat atheists
in
a 'scientific' debate regarding the existence of 'God', is it not? Like
shooting fish in a barrel, one would think.
Sounded as though he did rather well minutes ago on 'The O'Reilly
Factor'.
Maybe as well as O'Reilly did himself when Mr. 'I Can't Figure Out How
One
Brain Can Contain So Much Smarts' 'beat' Richard Dawkins in their
classic
'have at it'. At least 'Bill' seems to think he did. He just punched
holes
in the 'Big Bang' argument, you know.
Wonder how Cameron will do in tonight's debate. It's just minutes away
for
me out here.
Kirk Cameron the onetime 'atheist'.
Why couldn't he just develop a drug problem like a *normal*
washed up child star?
-jc
He did: The infamous 'Opiate of the masses'. Instead of cocaine, heroin or
alcohol, Kirk got addicted to 'Jesus'. (Just as difficult a 'habit' to
break and remain 'clean' as the others from what I hear.)
"I used to be all fucked up on drugs. Now I'm all fucked up the Lord"
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "skyeyes" |
|
| Title: Re: Kirk Cameron: One Time 'Atheist'! |
10 May 2007 11:42:44 AM |
|
|
On May 10, 9:18 am, "Greywolf" <greyw...@cybrzn.com> wrote:
"jcon" <cirej...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1178801227.299099.240520@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
On May 9, 10:55 pm, "Greywolf" <greyw...@cybrzn.com> wrote:
Well when one is a former 'atheist' it is rather easy to defeat atheists
in
a 'scientific' debate regarding the existence of 'God', is it not? Like
shooting fish in a barrel, one would think.
Sounded as though he did rather well minutes ago on 'The O'Reilly
Factor'.
Maybe as well as O'Reilly did himself when Mr. 'I Can't Figure Out How
One
Brain Can Contain So Much Smarts' 'beat' Richard Dawkins in their classic
'have at it'. At least 'Bill' seems to think he did. He just punched
holes
in the 'Big Bang' argument, you know.
Wonder how Cameron will do in tonight's debate. It's just minutes away
for
me out here.
Kirk Cameron the onetime 'atheist'.
Why couldn't he just develop a drug problem like a *normal*
washed up child star?
-jc
He did: The infamous 'Opiate of the masses'. Instead of cocaine, heroin or
alcohol, Kirk got addicted to 'Jesus'. (Just as difficult a 'habit' to break
and remain 'clean' as the others from what I hear.)
Nah, I broke the Jesus habit back in 1971, and I've been clean ever
since. Once you've got your head clear, it's pretty easy to keep it
that way. There are no little neurons in your brain that keep craving
Jesus after you've broken the addiction.
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes at dakotacom dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Kirk Cameron: One Time 'Atheist'! |
10 May 2007 07:59:47 PM |
|
|
On 10 May 2007 09:42:44 -0700, skyeyes <skyeyes@dakotacom.net> wrote:
- Refer: <1178815364.478941.245070@e51g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
On May 10, 9:18 am, "Greywolf" <greyw...@cybrzn.com> wrote:
"jcon" <cirej...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1178801227.299099.240520@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
On May 9, 10:55 pm, "Greywolf" <greyw...@cybrzn.com> wrote:
Well when one is a former 'atheist' it is rather easy to defeat atheists
in
a 'scientific' debate regarding the existence of 'God', is it not? Like
shooting fish in a barrel, one would think.
Sounded as though he did rather well minutes ago on 'The O'Reilly
Factor'.
Maybe as well as O'Reilly did himself when Mr. 'I Can't Figure Out How
One
Brain Can Contain So Much Smarts' 'beat' Richard Dawkins in their classic
'have at it'. At least 'Bill' seems to think he did. He just punched
holes
in the 'Big Bang' argument, you know.
Wonder how Cameron will do in tonight's debate. It's just minutes away
for
me out here.
Kirk Cameron the onetime 'atheist'.
Why couldn't he just develop a drug problem like a *normal*
washed up child star?
-jc
He did: The infamous 'Opiate of the masses'. Instead of cocaine, heroin or
alcohol, Kirk got addicted to 'Jesus'. (Just as difficult a 'habit' to break
and remain 'clean' as the others from what I hear.)
Nah, I broke the Jesus habit back in 1971, and I've been clean ever
since. Once you've got your head clear, it's pretty easy to keep it
that way. There are no little neurons in your brain that keep craving
Jesus after you've broken the addiction.
How do you cope at parties when some nasty pusher offers free bible
tracts?
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Kirk Cameron: One Time 'Atheist'! |
10 May 2007 08:42:16 AM |
|
|
On 10 May 2007 05:47:07 -0700, jcon <cirejcon@yahoo.com> wrote:
- Refer: <1178801227.299099.240520@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
On May 9, 10:55 pm, "Greywolf" <greyw...@cybrzn.com> wrote:
Well when one is a former 'atheist' it is rather easy to defeat atheists in
a 'scientific' debate regarding the existence of 'God', is it not? Like
shooting fish in a barrel, one would think.
Sounded as though he did rather well minutes ago on 'The O'Reilly Factor'.
Maybe as well as O'Reilly did himself when Mr. 'I Can't Figure Out How One
Brain Can Contain So Much Smarts' 'beat' Richard Dawkins in their classic
'have at it'. At least 'Bill' seems to think he did. He just punched holes
in the 'Big Bang' argument, you know.
Wonder how Cameron will do in tonight's debate. It's just minutes away for
me out here.
Kirk Cameron the onetime 'atheist'.
Why couldn't he just develop a drug problem like a *normal*
washed up child star?
He did.
--
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A.Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Kirk Cameron: One Time 'Atheist'! |
10 May 2007 07:50:21 AM |
|
|
On 10 May 2007 05:47:07 -0700, jcon <cirejcon@yahoo.com> wrote:
On May 9, 10:55 pm, "Greywolf" <greyw...@cybrzn.com> wrote:
Well when one is a former 'atheist' it is rather easy to defeat atheists in
a 'scientific' debate regarding the existence of 'God', is it not? Like
shooting fish in a barrel, one would think.
Sounded as though he did rather well minutes ago on 'The O'Reilly Factor'.
Maybe as well as O'Reilly did himself when Mr. 'I Can't Figure Out How One
Brain Can Contain So Much Smarts' 'beat' Richard Dawkins in their classic
'have at it'. At least 'Bill' seems to think he did. He just punched holes
in the 'Big Bang' argument, you know.
Wonder how Cameron will do in tonight's debate. It's just minutes away for
me out here.
Kirk Cameron the onetime 'atheist'.
Why couldn't he just develop a drug problem like a *normal*
washed up child star?
He did. He got addicted to fundamentalism.
-jc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Kirk Cameron: One Time 'Atheist'! |
10 May 2007 03:15:24 PM |
|
|
"Christopher A.Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:i756439b705395ish0q9uop9tmjlmqr5aj@4ax.com...
On 10 May 2007 05:47:07 -0700, jcon <cirejcon@yahoo.com> wrote:
On May 9, 10:55 pm, "Greywolf" <greyw...@cybrzn.com> wrote:
Well when one is a former 'atheist' it is rather easy to defeat atheists
in
a 'scientific' debate regarding the existence of 'God', is it not? Like
shooting fish in a barrel, one would think.
Sounded as though he did rather well minutes ago on 'The O'Reilly
Factor'.
Maybe as well as O'Reilly did himself when Mr. 'I Can't Figure Out How
One
Brain Can Contain So Much Smarts' 'beat' Richard Dawkins in their
classic
'have at it'. At least 'Bill' seems to think he did. He just punched
holes
in the 'Big Bang' argument, you know.
Wonder how Cameron will do in tonight's debate. It's just minutes away
for
me out here.
Kirk Cameron the onetime 'atheist'.
Why couldn't he just develop a drug problem like a *normal*
washed up child star?
He did. He got addicted to fundamentalism.
You know who else did? That chick who played Blair on "The Facts of Life".
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A.Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Kirk Cameron: One Time 'Atheist'! |
10 May 2007 03:22:53 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 10 May 2007 16:15:24 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
"Christopher A.Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:i756439b705395ish0q9uop9tmjlmqr5aj@4ax.com...
On 10 May 2007 05:47:07 -0700, jcon <cirejcon@yahoo.com> wrote:
On May 9, 10:55 pm, "Greywolf" <greyw...@cybrzn.com> wrote:
Well when one is a former 'atheist' it is rather easy to defeat atheists
in
a 'scientific' debate regarding the existence of 'God', is it not? Like
shooting fish in a barrel, one would think.
Sounded as though he did rather well minutes ago on 'The O'Reilly
Factor'.
Maybe as well as O'Reilly did himself when Mr. 'I Can't Figure Out How
One
Brain Can Contain So Much Smarts' 'beat' Richard Dawkins in their
classic
'have at it'. At least 'Bill' seems to think he did. He just punched
holes
in the 'Big Bang' argument, you know.
Wonder how Cameron will do in tonight's debate. It's just minutes away
for
me out here.
Kirk Cameron the onetime 'atheist'.
Why couldn't he just develop a drug problem like a *normal*
washed up child star?
He did. He got addicted to fundamentalism.
You know who else did? That chick who played Blair on "The Facts of Life".
And Bliar has announced his resignation as Prime Minister.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Kirk Cameron: One Time 'Atheist'! |
11 May 2007 03:25:52 PM |
|
|
Christopher A.Lee wrote:
He did. He got addicted to fundamentalism.
You know who else did? That chick who played Blair on "The Facts of
Life".
And Bliar has announced his resignation as Prime Minister.
Hehe...Bliar...never heard that one before. You did mean to do that right?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: Kirk Cameron: One Time 'Atheist'! |
11 May 2007 08:28:09 PM |
|
|
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in
news:kIOdnVIrV4LMTNnbnZ2dnUVZ_gydnZ2d@giganews.com:
Christopher A.Lee wrote:
He did. He got addicted to fundamentalism.
You know who else did? That chick who played Blair on "The Facts of
Life".
And Bliar has announced his resignation as Prime Minister.
Hehe...Bliar...never heard that one before. You did mean to do that
right?
Nice one, too--though I've been partial to "Poodle" m'self.
--
Doc Smartass, BAAWA Knight of Heckling
aa # 1939
Help Prevent Projectile Stupidity
Duct-Tape a Fundie's Mouth Shut Today!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Kirk Cameron: One Time 'Atheist'! |
11 May 2007 06:02:53 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 11 May 2007 16:25:52 -0400, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <kIOdnVIrV4LMTNnbnZ2dnUVZ_gydnZ2d@giganews.com>
Christopher A.Lee wrote:
He did. He got addicted to fundamentalism.
You know who else did? That chick who played Blair on "The Facts of
Life".
And Bliar has announced his resignation as Prime Minister.
Hehe...Bliar...never heard that one before. You did mean to do that right?
It is a fairly common variant amongst realists.
--
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A.Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Kirk Cameron: One Time 'Atheist'! |
11 May 2007 03:31:22 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 11 May 2007 16:25:52 -0400, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
Christopher A.Lee wrote:
He did. He got addicted to fundamentalism.
You know who else did? That chick who played Blair on "The Facts of
Life".
And Bliar has announced his resignation as Prime Minister.
Hehe...Bliar...never heard that one before. You did mean to do that right?
Yep.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Kirk Cameron: One Time 'Atheist'! |
10 May 2007 09:56:46 AM |
|
|
Christopher A.Lee wrote:
On 10 May 2007 05:47:07 -0700, jcon <cirejcon@yahoo.com> wrote:
On May 9, 10:55 pm, "Greywolf" <greyw...@cybrzn.com> wrote:
Well when one is a former 'atheist' it is rather easy to defeat
atheists in a 'scientific' debate regarding the existence of 'God',
is it not? Like shooting fish in a barrel, one would think.
Sounded as though he did rather well minutes ago on 'The O'Reilly
Factor'. Maybe as well as O'Reilly did himself when Mr. 'I Can't
Figure Out How One Brain Can Contain So Much Smarts' 'beat' Richard
Dawkins in their classic 'have at it'. At least 'Bill' seems to
think he did. He just punched holes in the 'Big Bang' argument, you
know.
Wonder how Cameron will do in tonight's debate. It's just minutes
away for me out here.
Kirk Cameron the onetime 'atheist'.
Why couldn't he just develop a drug problem like a *normal*
washed up child star?
He did. He got addicted to fundamentalism.
How about something less damaging like crank?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Kirk Cameron: One Time 'Atheist'! |
10 May 2007 07:58:18 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 10 May 2007 10:56:46 -0400, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <wamdnTPVRZczr97bnZ2dnUVZ_o-knZ2d@giganews.com>
Christopher A.Lee wrote:
On 10 May 2007 05:47:07 -0700, jcon <cirejcon@yahoo.com> wrote:
On May 9, 10:55 pm, "Greywolf" <greyw...@cybrzn.com> wrote:
Well when one is a former 'atheist' it is rather easy to defeat
atheists in a 'scientific' debate regarding the existence of 'God',
is it not? Like shooting fish in a barrel, one would think.
Sounded as though he did rather well minutes ago on 'The O'Reilly
Factor'. Maybe as well as O'Reilly did himself when Mr. 'I Can't
Figure Out How One Brain Can Contain So Much Smarts' 'beat' Richard
Dawkins in their classic 'have at it'. At least 'Bill' seems to
think he did. He just punched holes in the 'Big Bang' argument, you
know.
Wonder how Cameron will do in tonight's debate. It's just minutes
away for me out here.
Kirk Cameron the onetime 'atheist'.
Why couldn't he just develop a drug problem like a *normal*
washed up child star?
He did. He got addicted to fundamentalism.
How about something less damaging like crank?
Was that a fraudian slip?
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Kirk Cameron: One Time 'Atheist'! |
11 May 2007 03:24:53 PM |
|
|
Michael Gray wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2007 10:56:46 -0400, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <wamdnTPVRZczr97bnZ2dnUVZ_o-knZ2d@giganews.com>
Christopher A.Lee wrote:
On 10 May 2007 05:47:07 -0700, jcon <cirejcon@yahoo.com> wrote:
On May 9, 10:55 pm, "Greywolf" <greyw...@cybrzn.com> wrote:
Well when one is a former 'atheist' it is rather easy to defeat
atheists in a 'scientific' debate regarding the existence of
'God', is it not? Like shooting fish in a barrel, one would think.
Sounded as though he did rather well minutes ago on 'The O'Reilly
Factor'. Maybe as well as O'Reilly did himself when Mr. 'I Can't
Figure Out How One Brain Can Contain So Much Smarts' 'beat'
Richard Dawkins in their classic 'have at it'. At least 'Bill'
seems to think he did. He just punched holes in the 'Big Bang'
argument, you know.
Wonder how Cameron will do in tonight's debate. It's just minutes
away for me out here.
Kirk Cameron the onetime 'atheist'.
Why couldn't he just develop a drug problem like a *normal*
washed up child star?
He did. He got addicted to fundamentalism.
How about something less damaging like crank?
Was that a fraudian slip?
I don't get it...do you think crank is more damaging than sacrificing your
intellect to the Sky Pixie?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Kirk Cameron: One Time 'Atheist'! |
11 May 2007 06:02:01 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 11 May 2007 16:24:53 -0400, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <IvSdnXRKyNCITNnbnZ2dnUVZ_oqmnZ2d@giganews.com>
Michael Gray wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2007 10:56:46 -0400, "Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <wamdnTPVRZczr97bnZ2dnUVZ_o-knZ2d@giganews.com>
Christopher A.Lee wrote:
On 10 May 2007 05:47:07 -0700, jcon <cirejcon@yahoo.com> wrote:
On May 9, 10:55 pm, "Greywolf" <greyw...@cybrzn.com> wrote:
Well when one is a former 'atheist' it is rather easy to defeat
atheists in a 'scientific' debate regarding the existence of
'God', is it not? Like shooting fish in a barrel, one would think.
Sounded as though he did rather well minutes ago on 'The O'Reilly
Factor'. Maybe as well as O'Reilly did himself when Mr. 'I Can't
Figure Out How One Brain Can Contain So Much Smarts' 'beat'
Richard Dawkins in their classic 'have at it'. At least 'Bill'
seems to think he did. He just punched holes in the 'Big Bang'
argument, you know.
Wonder how Cameron will do in tonight's debate. It's just minutes
away for me out here.
Kirk Cameron the onetime 'atheist'.
Why couldn't he just develop a drug problem like a *normal*
washed up child star?
He did. He got addicted to fundamentalism.
How about something less damaging like crank?
Was that a fraudian slip?
I don't get it...do you think crank is more damaging than sacrificing your
intellect to the Sky Pixie?
Only if you get hit over the head by one.
Or has the term for "crack" morphed while I wasn't looking?
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "jcon" |
|
| Title: Re: Kirk Cameron: One Time 'Atheist'! |
10 May 2007 11:55:31 AM |
|
|
On May 10, 7:50 am, Christopher A.Lee <c...@optonline.net> wrote:
On 10 May 2007 05:47:07 -0700, jcon <cirej...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On May 9, 10:55 pm, "Greywolf" <greyw...@cybrzn.com> wrote:
Well when one is a former 'atheist' it is rather easy to defeat atheists in
a 'scientific' debate regarding the existence of 'God', is it not? Like
shooting fish in a barrel, one would think.
Sounded as though he did rather well minutes ago on 'The O'Reilly Factor'.
Maybe as well as O'Reilly did himself when Mr. 'I Can't Figure Out How One
Brain Can Contain So Much Smarts' 'beat' Richard Dawkins in their classic
'have at it'. At least 'Bill' seems to think he did. He just punched holes
in the 'Big Bang' argument, you know.
Wonder how Cameron will do in tonight's debate. It's just minutes away for
me out here.
Kirk Cameron the onetime 'atheist'.
Why couldn't he just develop a drug problem like a *normal*
washed up child star?
He did. He got addicted to fundamentalism.
True enough. There was an excellent episode of Penn and
Teller's "*****" show about religiously based "Twelve Step
Programs" like AA. They showcased Gary Busey, who's
twice as scary and weird as a religious nut than he
ever was on the bottle.
-jc
-jc
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "JohnN" |
|
| Title: Re: Kirk Cameron: One Time 'Atheist'! |
10 May 2007 08:09:21 AM |
|
|
On May 9, 11:55 pm, "Greywolf" <greyw...@cybrzn.com> wrote:
Well when one is a former 'atheist' it is rather easy to defeat atheists in
a 'scientific' debate regarding the existence of 'God', is it not? Like
shooting fish in a barrel, one would think.
Sounded as though he did rather well minutes ago on 'The O'Reilly Factor'.
Maybe as well as O'Reilly did himself when Mr. 'I Can't Figure Out How One
Brain Can Contain So Much Smarts' 'beat' Richard Dawkins in their classic
'have at it'. At least 'Bill' seems to think he did. He just punched holes
in the 'Big Bang' argument, you know.
Wonder how Cameron will do in tonight's debate. It's just minutes away for
me out here.
Kirk Cameron the onetime 'atheist'.
I wonder: Did he ever make his 'atheism' known to any one other than
himself?
Greywolf
Kirk was an atheist until one day, while holding his banana...
JohnN
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Kirk Cameron: One Time 'Atheist'! |
10 May 2007 08:42:56 AM |
|
|
On 10 May 2007 06:09:21 -0700, JohnN <jnorris53@hotmail.com> wrote:
- Refer: <1178802561.268459.92200@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
On May 9, 11:55 pm, "Greywolf" <greyw...@cybrzn.com> wrote:
Well when one is a former 'atheist' it is rather easy to defeat atheists in
a 'scientific' debate regarding the existence of 'God', is it not? Like
shooting fish in a barrel, one would think.
Sounded as though he did rather well minutes ago on 'The O'Reilly Factor'.
Maybe as well as O'Reilly did himself when Mr. 'I Can't Figure Out How One
Brain Can Contain So Much Smarts' 'beat' Richard Dawkins in their classic
'have at it'. At least 'Bill' seems to think he did. He just punched holes
in the 'Big Bang' argument, you know.
Wonder how Cameron will do in tonight's debate. It's just minutes away for
me out here.
Kirk Cameron the onetime 'atheist'.
I wonder: Did he ever make his 'atheism' known to any one other than
himself?
Greywolf
Kirk was an atheist until one day, while holding his banana...
Don't tell me: The "second coming"?
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: Kirk Cameron: One Time 'Atheist'! |
10 May 2007 10:13:41 AM |
|
|
On May 9, 11:55?pm, "Greywolf" <greyw...@cybrzn.com> wrote:
Well when one is a former 'atheist' it is rather easy to defeat atheists in
a 'scientific' debate regarding the existence of 'God', is it not? Like
shooting fish in a barrel, one would think.
Sounded as though he did rather well minutes ago on 'The O'Reilly Factor'.
Maybe as well as O'Reilly did himself when Mr. 'I Can't Figure Out How One
Brain Can Contain So Much Smarts' 'beat' Richard Dawkins in their classic
'have at it'. At least 'Bill' seems to think he did. He just punched holes
in the 'Big Bang' argument, you know.
Wonder how Cameron will do in tonight's debate. It's just minutes away for
me out here.
Kirk Cameron the onetime 'atheist'.
I wonder: Did he ever make his 'atheism' known to any one other than
himself?
Greywolf
Are you people already making excuses?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Greywolf" |
|
| Title: Re: Kirk Cameron: One Time 'Atheist'! |
10 May 2007 11:37:08 AM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1178810021.899877.205620@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On May 9, 11:55?pm, "Greywolf" <greyw...@cybrzn.com> wrote:
Well when one is a former 'atheist' it is rather easy to defeat atheists
in
a 'scientific' debate regarding the existence of 'God', is it not? Like
shooting fish in a barrel, one would think.
Sounded as though he did rather well minutes ago on 'The O'Reilly
Factor'.
Maybe as well as O'Reilly did himself when Mr. 'I Can't Figure Out How
One
Brain Can Contain So Much Smarts' 'beat' Richard Dawkins in their classic
'have at it'. At least 'Bill' seems to think he did. He just punched
holes
in the 'Big Bang' argument, you know.
Wonder how Cameron will do in tonight's debate. It's just minutes away
for
me out here.
Kirk Cameron the onetime 'atheist'.
I wonder: Did he ever make his 'atheism' known to any one other than
himself?
Greywolf
Are you people already making excuses?
After watching what was no 'real' televised debate (Where was the vast
majority of the 'give-and-take'? All I saw was some sort of 're-cap'.) I
noticed that the Jesus people broke their promise to prove 'God's' existence
*scientifically* and had to resort to appealing to the bible and,
ultimately, 'faith' to make their case. What happened to the scientific
'data'?
As for two distinct animals breeding and forming an altogether 'new' animal:
Ever hear of a 'Liger'? No? It's an animal that a lion and a tiger have
*already* produced after mating? In fact, there's going to be a program on
this creature as part of a National Geographic special, I believe. Do you
think one of these puppies happened to be on Noah's ark too?
Major point: Explain why no human being can point to something in the
universe and say, 'There, over there; *that's* 'God'. He's right over
*there*!!' Now why is that?
Why are abstract constructs used to try and prove the existence of 'God' if
a *real* one is sitting out there in the universe just watching us argue
over whether or not he exists, hmmm?
Greywolf
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
