Religions > Atheism > Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing Abortion Protester
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
06 May 2005 10:15:11 PM |
| Object: |
Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing Abortion Protester |
It is a crime how pro-life advocates are treated by certain elements of
the law enforcement agencies in this country. Peaceful protest and
attempts to educate an uninformed public is a right. All decent people
should lend moral support to this lawsuit.
http://www.lifenews.com/nat1317.html
Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing Abortion
Protester
Washington, DC -- The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) has
filed a lawsuit against a Washington-area Planned Parenthood and a
security guard at the abortion business. The suit has been filed for a
pro-life college student who says he was tackled to the ground and
injured when protesting abortion outside the facility last year.
Daniel Heenan, who attends Christendom College in Front Royal,
Virginia, had participated in a prayer vigil and sidewalk counseling
outside the Washington Planned Parenthood for three years. The suit
contends he was injured when a security guard knocked him to the
ground.
The incident occurred after Heenan approached the abortion facility and
crossed a picket line painted on the ground that limited the protests
of a group of pro-life advocates involved in an unrelated lawsuit.
The line did not apply to Heenan, but he contends the Planned
Parenthood guard forcefully shoved him to the ground after tackling
him.
Heenan said he did nothing to provoke the attack and gave no indication
that he was planning to enter the abortion facility or harass the
security guard.
According to the lawsuit, several officers of the D.C. Metropolitan
Police Department refused Heenan's request to press charges against the
security guard. There was no police report filed about the attack.
"It is simply unacceptable for citizens of the United States, who are
on public property, to be tackled or knocked to the ground by security
guards," said Jim Henderson, a senior ACLJ legal counsel.
"In this case, a college-aged Catholic sidewalk counselor was attacked
from behind and thrown to the ground on a public sidewalk for no other
reason than seeking to offer his message of hope and help to women
approaching the Planned Parenthood facility," Henderson explained.
.
|
|
| User: "• R. L. Measures" |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing Abortion Protester |
09 May 2005 06:10:50 PM |
|
|
In article <LUNfe.4263$941.3507@trnddc08>, "Susan Cohen"
<flavia18@verizon.net> wrote:
". R. L. Measures" <_r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:_r-0905050557320001@192.168.1.100...
In article <EMBfe.3844$941.1455@trnddc08>, "Susan Cohen"
<flavia18@verizon.net> wrote:
"Alan W. Craft" <mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote in message
[snip droolings]
I can see exactly why you hate women so much.
"Lack of occupation with leads to preoccupation with....."
Or, the even pithier standby: "A ***** is someone who will sleep with men
who
AREN'T YOU."
** Excellent chortles. thanks, Susan.
Sicko losers bring out the worst in me.
Or best - however you choose to look at it :-)
** laughter is the best medicine.
chees, Susan
--
Rich. 805.386.3734
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alan W. Craft" |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing Abortion Protester |
10 May 2005 03:32:43 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 09 May 2005 16:10:50 -0700, (• R. L. Measures) emanated:
In article <LUNfe.4263$941.3507@trnddc08>, "Susan Cohen"
<flavia18@verizon.net> wrote:
". R. L. Measures" < > wrote in message
news:_r-0905050557320001@192.168.1.100...
In article <EMBfe.3844$941.1455@trnddc08>, "Susan Cohen"
<flavia18@verizon.net> wrote:
"Alan W. Craft" <mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote in message
[snip droolings]
I can see exactly why you hate women so much.
"Lack of occupation with leads to preoccupation with....."
Or, the even pithier standby: "A ***** is someone who will sleep with men
who
AREN'T YOU."
** Excellent chortles. thanks, Susan.
Sicko losers bring out the worst in me.
Or best - however you choose to look at it :-)
** laughter is the best medicine.
chees, Susan
Are you taking pictures now, Measures?
Alan
.
|
|
|
| User: "• R. L. Measures" |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing Abortion Protester |
10 May 2005 04:37:20 AM |
|
|
In article <5cs081lg0rqro4jad27b6nnj0gk0aksdba@4ax.com>, Alan W. Craft
<mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 09 May 2005 16:10:50 -0700, (• R. L. Measures) emanated:
In article <LUNfe.4263$941.3507@trnddc08>, "Susan Cohen"
<flavia18@verizon.net> wrote:
". R. L. Measures" < > wrote in message
news:_r-0905050557320001@192.168.1.100...
In article <EMBfe.3844$941.1455@trnddc08>, "Susan Cohen"
<flavia18@verizon.net> wrote:
"Alan W. Craft" <mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote in message
[snip droolings]
I can see exactly why you hate women so much.
"Lack of occupation with leads to preoccupation with....."
Or, the even pithier standby: "A ***** is someone who will sleep
with men
who
AREN'T YOU."
** Excellent chortles. thanks, Susan.
Sicko losers bring out the worst in me.
Or best - however you choose to look at it :-)
** laughter is the best medicine.
chees, Susan
Are you taking pictures now, Measures?
• I started taking pictures in high-school.
cheers, Alan
--
Rich. 805.386.3734
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Alan W. Craft" |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing Abortion Protester |
09 May 2005 08:55:44 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 09 May 2005 04:35:48 GMT, "Susan Cohen" <flavia18@verizon.net> emanated:
"Alan W. Craft" <mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cvos71l65l3hk74fkfv6m43vq0h2j961s1@4ax.com...
On 7 May 2005 19:54:03 -0500, (Kate ) emanated:
So you think men who get women pregnant should be medically
forced to carry the child to term, eh?
Interesting idea.
Apparently you're not very knowledgeable, let alone sympathetic
or forgiving, of the human male's inculpable sexual nature.
Apparently you're not aware that men have the duty to control themselves, or
be counted as less than human.
Most of us do, and therefore are not to be.
After all, do we not favor our mothers, and as you your fathers?
Rather, I think that if a woman doesn't wish to get pregnant in the
first place she should take those steps necessary to prevent it.
And the fact that a woman can't always do so, or that even if she does, the
methods would fail - or that, even wanting a child, she might then be forced
to abort for other reasons ( go ahead, pretend there are none) - none of
these mean anything to you in your questo to control women, & villify those
you can't control.
I seek to control no one.
She
has, above all, the greater reason, and therefore incentive, to so do.
Ah, but that's not always practical, is it?
First, the promenade, groomed and tarted...
Yes,we already know you are the most pathetic of pigs....
Then, the heat of the moment beginning with the mixed, half-spent,
bodily-warmed scents of Soir de Paris and Royal Copenhagen...
Those little frilly underthings...
I can see exactly why you hate women so much.
I hate women because I question, yea, ridicule those who premeditatedly abort?
Bless you, Cohen, and the ***** you rode up on.
"Lack of occupation with leads to preoccupation with....."
Or, the even pithier standby: "A ***** is someone who will sleep with men who
AREN'T YOU."
Susan
Need to vent?
Alan
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pat Winstanley" |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing Abortion Protester |
09 May 2005 01:28:12 PM |
|
|
In article <1fqu715rgrc3rjo40a3pe7qjnoaple5o1s@4ax.com>, mauritius4
@hotmail.com says...
Apparently you're not aware that men have the duty to control themselves, or
be counted as less than human.
Most of us do, and therefore are not to be.
Then why do you claim that men can't control their lust when a woman
walks past them going about her lawful, ordinary business?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alan W. Craft" |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing Abortion Protester |
10 May 2005 03:52:43 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 9 May 2005 19:28:12 +0100, Pat Winstanley <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> emanated:
In article <1fqu715rgrc3rjo40a3pe7qjnoaple5o1s@4ax.com>, mauritius4
@hotmail.com says...
Apparently you're not aware that men have the duty to control themselves, or
be counted as less than human.
Most of us do, and therefore are not to be.
Then why do you claim that men can't control their lust when a woman
walks past them going about her lawful, ordinary business?
Where did I give you the idea for ~that~ scenario?
Incidentally, there you go again, Winstanley, zeroing in on that specific
group whilst missing the target entirely, and deliberately to boot.
It's most tiresome of you.
Don't you tire of being intellectually dishonest, and glaringly so?
Alan
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pat Winstanley" |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing Abortion Protester |
10 May 2005 05:50:21 AM |
|
|
In article <j4t08115k4dfrbk8elod0lu1t078qmqjj8@4ax.com>, mauritius4
@hotmail.com says...
Then why do you claim that men can't control their lust when a woman
walks past them going about her lawful, ordinary business?
Where did I give you the idea for ~that~ scenario?
Your own words.
Of course, if you wish to retract your claim... :-)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing Abortion Protester |
09 May 2005 06:21:22 PM |
|
|
Susan Cohen wrote:
"Alan W. Craft" <mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cvos71l65l3hk74fkfv6m43vq0h2j961s1@4ax.com...
On 7 May 2005 19:54:03 -0500, (Kate ) emanated:
So you think men who get women pregnant should be medically
forced to carry the child to term, eh?
Interesting idea.
Apparently you're not very knowledgeable, let alone
sympathetic
or forgiving, of the human male's inculpable sexual nature.
Apparently you're not aware that men have the duty to control
themselves, or
be counted as less than human.
Bravo! It couldn't have been said better.
Rather, I think that if a woman doesn't wish to get pregnant
in the
first place she should take those steps necessary to prevent it.
And the fact that a woman can't always do so, or that even if she
does, the
methods would fail -
There's always her own duty to control herself or be counted as less
than human.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Susan Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing Abortion Protester |
09 May 2005 10:31:54 PM |
|
|
<InclusiveTruth@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1115680882.337268.319050@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Susan Cohen wrote:
"Alan W. Craft" <mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cvos71l65l3hk74fkfv6m43vq0h2j961s1@4ax.com...
On 7 May 2005 19:54:03 -0500, (Kate ) emanated:
So you think men who get women pregnant should be medically
forced to carry the child to term, eh?
Interesting idea.
Apparently you're not very knowledgeable, let alone
sympathetic
or forgiving, of the human male's inculpable sexual nature.
Apparently you're not aware that men have the duty to control
themselves, or
be counted as less than human.
Bravo! It couldn't have been said better.
Rather, I think that if a woman doesn't wish to get pregnant
in the
first place she should take those steps necessary to prevent it.
And the fact that a woman can't always do so, or that even if she
does, the
methods would fail -
There's always her own duty to control herself or be counted as less
than human.
That's not the question here - or so I thought.
Of course women should never pressure men for sex.
The idiot I'm talking to seems to think that women are responsible for all
the consequences of sex, whether they want to be or not, & must do exactly
as *he* wishes them to in the event of pregnancy. He also seems to think
that men should get some sort of "by" for their "drives".
Susan
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alan W. Craft" |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing Abortion Protester |
11 May 2005 12:28:47 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 10 May 2005 03:31:54 GMT, "Susan Cohen" <flavia18@verizon.net> emanated:
<InclusiveTruth@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1115680882.337268.319050@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Susan Cohen wrote:
"Alan W. Craft" <mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cvos71l65l3hk74fkfv6m43vq0h2j961s1@4ax.com...
On 7 May 2005 19:54:03 -0500, (Kate ) emanated:
So you think men who get women pregnant should be medically
forced to carry the child to term, eh?
Interesting idea.
Apparently you're not very knowledgeable, let alone
sympathetic
or forgiving, of the human male's inculpable sexual nature.
Apparently you're not aware that men have the duty to control
themselves, or
be counted as less than human.
Bravo! It couldn't have been said better.
Rather, I think that if a woman doesn't wish to get pregnant
in the
first place she should take those steps necessary to prevent it.
And the fact that a woman can't always do so, or that even if she
does, the
methods would fail -
There's always her own duty to control herself or be counted as less
than human.
That's not the question here - or so I thought.
Of course women should never pressure men for sex.
The idiot I'm talking to seems to think that women are responsible for all
the consequences of sex, whether they want to be or not, & must do exactly
as *he* wishes them to in the event of pregnancy. He also seems to think
that men should get some sort of "by" for their "drives".
Susan
Methinks you're suffering from a clinical case of penis-envy, "Butch" Cohen.
Alan
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pat Winstanley" |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing Abortion Protester |
08 May 2005 03:05:43 PM |
|
|
In article <cvos71l65l3hk74fkfv6m43vq0h2j961s1@4ax.com>, mauritius4
@hotmail.com says...
Apparently you're not very knowledgeable, let alone sympathetic
or forgiving, of the human male's inculpable sexual nature.
Rather, I think that if a woman doesn't wish to get pregnant in the
first place she should take those steps necessary to prevent it. She
has, above all, the greater reason, and therefore incentive, to so do.
Ah, but that's not always practical, is it?
First, the promenade, groomed and tarted...
Then, the heat of the moment beginning with the mixed, half-spent,
bodily-warmed scents of Soir de Paris and Royal Copenhagen...
Those little frilly underthings...
Apparently you are incapable fo controlling your lust, but must rape...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alan W. Craft" |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing Abortion Protester |
08 May 2005 11:49:40 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 8 May 2005 21:05:43 +0100, Pat Winstanley <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> emanated:
In article <cvos71l65l3hk74fkfv6m43vq0h2j961s1@4ax.com>, mauritius4
@hotmail.com says...
Apparently you're not very knowledgeable, let alone sympathetic
or forgiving, of the human male's inculpable sexual nature.
Rather, I think that if a woman doesn't wish to get pregnant in the
first place she should take those steps necessary to prevent it. She
has, above all, the greater reason, and therefore incentive, to so do.
Ah, but that's not always practical, is it?
First, the promenade, groomed and tarted...
Then, the heat of the moment beginning with the mixed, half-spent,
bodily-warmed scents of Soir de Paris and Royal Copenhagen...
Those little frilly underthings...
Apparently you are incapable fo controlling your lust, but must rape...
I do nothing of the sort.
In defense you choose the group who become pregnant against their
will, mistakenly thinking that that will somehow divert attention from those
who premeditatedly abort...
....so you thought.
You're stalling, Winstanley.
I should think that to be beneath you as well.
Alan
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pat Winstanley" |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing Abortion Protester |
09 May 2005 04:14:30 AM |
|
|
In article <19pt71leepkcnl0hne97os49gpbmb81jfs@4ax.com>, mauritius4
@hotmail.com says...
Rather, I think that if a woman doesn't wish to get pregnant in the
first place she should take those steps necessary to prevent it. She
has, above all, the greater reason, and therefore incentive, to so do.
Ah, but that's not always practical, is it?
First, the promenade, groomed and tarted...
Then, the heat of the moment beginning with the mixed, half-spent,
bodily-warmed scents of Soir de Paris and Royal Copenhagen...
Those little frilly underthings...
Apparently you are incapable fo controlling your lust, but must rape...
I do nothing of the sort.
Your words above prove you the liar. :-))
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alan W. Craft" |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing Abortion Protester |
10 May 2005 03:44:38 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 9 May 2005 10:14:30 +0100, Pat Winstanley <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> emanated:
In article <19pt71leepkcnl0hne97os49gpbmb81jfs@4ax.com>, mauritius4
@hotmail.com says...
Rather, I think that if a woman doesn't wish to get pregnant in the
first place she should take those steps necessary to prevent it. She
has, above all, the greater reason, and therefore incentive, to so do.
Ah, but that's not always practical, is it?
First, the promenade, groomed and tarted...
Then, the heat of the moment beginning with the mixed, half-spent,
bodily-warmed scents of Soir de Paris and Royal Copenhagen...
Those little frilly underthings...
Apparently you are incapable fo controlling your lust, but must rape...
I do nothing of the sort.
Your words above prove you the liar. :-))
Well, I do fancy wearing Royal Copenhagen on occasion.
Alan
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing Abortion Protester |
08 May 2005 11:17:02 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 08 May 2005 14:35:10 -0500, Alan W. Craft
<mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 7 May 2005 19:54:03 -0500, (Kate ) emanated:
On Sat, 07 May 2005 18:20:17 -0500, Alan W. Craft
<mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 7 May 2005 22:43:13 +0100, Pat Winstanley <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> emanated:
In article <427d292c$0$2064$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk>,
michael.calwell@btopenworld.com says...
Yet you advocate that woman SHOULD be enslaved so that their bodies can
be used as incubators... regardless of the woman's wishes in the matter.
You are a hypocrite! ;-))
Uh no.
Uh yes.
You want women who are pregnant to be forced to continue those
pregnancies.
Yes...
...do the crime, do the time.
Alan
So you think men who get women pregnant should be medically
forced to carry the child to term, eh?
Interesting idea.
Apparently you're not very knowledgeable, let alone sympathetic
or forgiving, of the human male's inculpable sexual nature.
Rather, I think that if a woman doesn't wish to get pregnant in the
first place she should take those steps necessary to prevent it. She
has, above all, the greater reason, and therefore incentive, to so do.
Ah, but that's not always practical, is it?
First, the promenade, groomed and tarted...
Then, the heat of the moment beginning with the mixed, half-spent,
bodily-warmed scents of Soir de Paris and Royal Copenhagen...
Those little frilly underthings...
Alan
Let me guess - you typed that one handed.
Apparently you are the tart.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alan W. Craft" |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing Abortion Protester |
09 May 2005 08:57:15 AM |
|
|
On 8 May 2005 23:17:02 -0500, (Kate ) emanated:
On Sun, 08 May 2005 14:35:10 -0500, Alan W. Craft
<mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 7 May 2005 19:54:03 -0500, (Kate ) emanated:
On Sat, 07 May 2005 18:20:17 -0500, Alan W. Craft
<mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 7 May 2005 22:43:13 +0100, Pat Winstanley <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> emanated:
In article <427d292c$0$2064$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk>,
michael.calwell@btopenworld.com says...
Yet you advocate that woman SHOULD be enslaved so that their bodies can
be used as incubators... regardless of the woman's wishes in the matter.
You are a hypocrite! ;-))
Uh no.
Uh yes.
You want women who are pregnant to be forced to continue those
pregnancies.
Yes...
...do the crime, do the time.
Alan
So you think men who get women pregnant should be medically
forced to carry the child to term, eh?
Interesting idea.
Apparently you're not very knowledgeable, let alone sympathetic
or forgiving, of the human male's inculpable sexual nature.
Rather, I think that if a woman doesn't wish to get pregnant in the
first place she should take those steps necessary to prevent it. She
has, above all, the greater reason, and therefore incentive, to so do.
Ah, but that's not always practical, is it?
First, the promenade, groomed and tarted...
Then, the heat of the moment beginning with the mixed, half-spent,
bodily-warmed scents of Soir de Paris and Royal Copenhagen...
Those little frilly underthings...
Alan
Let me guess - you typed that one handed.
Actually...with my nose.
Apparently you are the tart.
Would not "man" suffice, after all?
Alan
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing Abortion Protester |
09 May 2005 09:37:02 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 09 May 2005 08:57:15 -0500, Alan W. Craft
<mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 8 May 2005 23:17:02 -0500, (Kate ) emanated:
On Sun, 08 May 2005 14:35:10 -0500, Alan W. Craft
<mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 7 May 2005 19:54:03 -0500, (Kate ) emanated:
On Sat, 07 May 2005 18:20:17 -0500, Alan W. Craft
<mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 7 May 2005 22:43:13 +0100, Pat Winstanley <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> emanated:
In article <427d292c$0$2064$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk>,
michael.calwell@btopenworld.com says...
Yet you advocate that woman SHOULD be enslaved so that their bodies can
be used as incubators... regardless of the woman's wishes in the matter.
You are a hypocrite! ;-))
Uh no.
Uh yes.
You want women who are pregnant to be forced to continue those
pregnancies.
Yes...
...do the crime, do the time.
Alan
So you think men who get women pregnant should be medically
forced to carry the child to term, eh?
Interesting idea.
Apparently you're not very knowledgeable, let alone sympathetic
or forgiving, of the human male's inculpable sexual nature.
Rather, I think that if a woman doesn't wish to get pregnant in the
first place she should take those steps necessary to prevent it. She
has, above all, the greater reason, and therefore incentive, to so do.
Ah, but that's not always practical, is it?
First, the promenade, groomed and tarted...
Then, the heat of the moment beginning with the mixed, half-spent,
bodily-warmed scents of Soir de Paris and Royal Copenhagen...
Those little frilly underthings...
Alan
Let me guess - you typed that one handed.
Actually...with my nose.
Apparently you are the tart.
Would not "man" suffice, after all?
No.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing Abortion Protester |
11 May 2005 01:02:34 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 09 May 2005 08:57:15 -0500, Alan W. Craft
<mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 8 May 2005 23:17:02 -0500, (Kate ) emanated:
On Sun, 08 May 2005 14:35:10 -0500, Alan W. Craft
<mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 7 May 2005 19:54:03 -0500, (Kate ) emanated:
On Sat, 07 May 2005 18:20:17 -0500, Alan W. Craft
<mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 7 May 2005 22:43:13 +0100, Pat Winstanley <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> emanated:
In article <427d292c$0$2064$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk>,
michael.calwell@btopenworld.com says...
Yet you advocate that woman SHOULD be enslaved so that their bodies can
be used as incubators... regardless of the woman's wishes in the matter.
You are a hypocrite! ;-))
Uh no.
Uh yes.
You want women who are pregnant to be forced to continue those
pregnancies.
Yes...
...do the crime, do the time.
Alan
So you think men who get women pregnant should be medically
forced to carry the child to term, eh?
Interesting idea.
Apparently you're not very knowledgeable, let alone sympathetic
or forgiving, of the human male's inculpable sexual nature.
Rather, I think that if a woman doesn't wish to get pregnant in the
first place she should take those steps necessary to prevent it. She
has, above all, the greater reason, and therefore incentive, to so do.
Ah, but that's not always practical, is it?
First, the promenade, groomed and tarted...
Then, the heat of the moment beginning with the mixed, half-spent,
bodily-warmed scents of Soir de Paris and Royal Copenhagen...
Those little frilly underthings...
Alan
Let me guess - you typed that one handed.
Actually...with my nose.
Apparently you are the tart.
Would not "man" suffice, after all?
No. Coward. Slaver. Ignoramous. Worm. Yes.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alan W. Craft" |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing Abortion Protester |
11 May 2005 03:12:34 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 11 May 2005 11:02:34 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> emanated:
On Mon, 09 May 2005 08:57:15 -0500, Alan W. Craft
<mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 8 May 2005 23:17:02 -0500, (Kate ) emanated:
On Sun, 08 May 2005 14:35:10 -0500, Alan W. Craft
<mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 7 May 2005 19:54:03 -0500, (Kate ) emanated:
On Sat, 07 May 2005 18:20:17 -0500, Alan W. Craft
<mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 7 May 2005 22:43:13 +0100, Pat Winstanley <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> emanated:
In article <427d292c$0$2064$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk>,
michael.calwell@btopenworld.com says...
Yet you advocate that woman SHOULD be enslaved so that their bodies can
be used as incubators... regardless of the woman's wishes in the matter.
You are a hypocrite! ;-))
Uh no.
Uh yes.
You want women who are pregnant to be forced to continue those
pregnancies.
Yes...
...do the crime, do the time.
Alan
So you think men who get women pregnant should be medically
forced to carry the child to term, eh?
Interesting idea.
Apparently you're not very knowledgeable, let alone sympathetic
or forgiving, of the human male's inculpable sexual nature.
Rather, I think that if a woman doesn't wish to get pregnant in the
first place she should take those steps necessary to prevent it. She
has, above all, the greater reason, and therefore incentive, to so do.
Ah, but that's not always practical, is it?
First, the promenade, groomed and tarted...
Then, the heat of the moment beginning with the mixed, half-spent,
bodily-warmed scents of Soir de Paris and Royal Copenhagen...
Those little frilly underthings...
Alan
Let me guess - you typed that one handed.
Actually...with my nose.
Apparently you are the tart.
Would not "man" suffice, after all?
No. Coward. Slaver. Ignoramous. Worm. Yes.
That third one; that should be "ignoramus," gobshite.
And to think that I was expecting such nice names.
Isn't there a well-worn, ceramic bong out there somewhere
upon which you should be suckling, which in turn slowly sucks
out what little remains of your mind?
Alan
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing Abortion Protester |
12 May 2005 05:59:24 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 11 May 2005 15:12:34 -0500, Alan W. Craft
<mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2005 11:02:34 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> emanated:
On Mon, 09 May 2005 08:57:15 -0500, Alan W. Craft
<mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 8 May 2005 23:17:02 -0500, (Kate ) emanated:
On Sun, 08 May 2005 14:35:10 -0500, Alan W. Craft
<mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 7 May 2005 19:54:03 -0500, (Kate ) emanated:
On Sat, 07 May 2005 18:20:17 -0500, Alan W. Craft
<mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 7 May 2005 22:43:13 +0100, Pat Winstanley <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> emanated:
In article <427d292c$0$2064$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk>,
michael.calwell@btopenworld.com says...
Yet you advocate that woman SHOULD be enslaved so that their bodies can
be used as incubators... regardless of the woman's wishes in the matter.
You are a hypocrite! ;-))
Uh no.
Uh yes.
You want women who are pregnant to be forced to continue those
pregnancies.
Yes...
...do the crime, do the time.
Alan
So you think men who get women pregnant should be medically
forced to carry the child to term, eh?
Interesting idea.
Apparently you're not very knowledgeable, let alone sympathetic
or forgiving, of the human male's inculpable sexual nature.
Rather, I think that if a woman doesn't wish to get pregnant in the
first place she should take those steps necessary to prevent it. She
has, above all, the greater reason, and therefore incentive, to so do.
Ah, but that's not always practical, is it?
First, the promenade, groomed and tarted...
Then, the heat of the moment beginning with the mixed, half-spent,
bodily-warmed scents of Soir de Paris and Royal Copenhagen...
Those little frilly underthings...
Alan
Let me guess - you typed that one handed.
Actually...with my nose.
Apparently you are the tart.
Would not "man" suffice, after all?
No. Coward. Slaver. Ignoramous. Worm. Yes.
That third one; that should be "ignoramus," gobshite.
So what *****-for-brains?
And to think that I was expecting such nice names.
You object to observed descriptors? [shrug] That's your problem.
Isn't there a well-worn, ceramic bong out there somewhere
upon which you should be suckling, which in turn slowly sucks
out what little remains of your mind?
Oh, you poor ignorant ***** sucker. Run along now and receive your
next holy clergical injection.
[LMAO at the mental toddler]
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Susan Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing Abortion Protester |
13 May 2005 06:39:49 PM |
|
|
"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote in message
news:1gn781dk581m4772vacguamo9hrvcais1r@4ax.com...
On Wed, 11 May 2005 15:12:34 -0500, Alan W. Craft
<mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote:
Isn't there a well-worn, ceramic bong out there somewhere
upon which you should be suckling, which in turn slowly sucks
out what little remains of your mind?
Oh, you poor ignorant ***** sucker. Run along now and receive your
next holy clergical injection.
[LMAO at the mental toddler]
I must congratulate you, tho'. You jostled him out of his usual dictatorial
tripe into a fuller revelation of his own impotence, as exemplified by his
pathetic ad hominem.
Susan
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing Abortion Protester |
14 May 2005 03:47:52 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 13 May 2005 23:39:49 GMT, "Susan Cohen" <flavia18@verizon.net>
wrote:
"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote in message
news:1gn781dk581m4772vacguamo9hrvcais1r@4ax.com...
On Wed, 11 May 2005 15:12:34 -0500, Alan W. Craft
<mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote:
Isn't there a well-worn, ceramic bong out there somewhere
upon which you should be suckling, which in turn slowly sucks
out what little remains of your mind?
Oh, you poor ignorant ***** sucker. Run along now and receive your
next holy clergical injection.
[LMAO at the mental toddler]
I must congratulate you, tho'. You jostled him out of his usual dictatorial
tripe into a fuller revelation of his own impotence, as exemplified by his
pathetic ad hominem.
Thank you gracious lady. Pathetic ad hom's go right along with
pathetic people. He and his kind are poor and pitiful wretches.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Alan W. Craft" |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing Abortion Protester |
14 May 2005 12:05:34 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 12 May 2005 15:59:24 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> emanated:
On Wed, 11 May 2005 15:12:34 -0500, Alan W. Craft
<mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2005 11:02:34 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> emanated:
On Mon, 09 May 2005 08:57:15 -0500, Alan W. Craft
<mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 8 May 2005 23:17:02 -0500, (Kate ) emanated:
On Sun, 08 May 2005 14:35:10 -0500, Alan W. Craft
<mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 7 May 2005 19:54:03 -0500, (Kate ) emanated:
On Sat, 07 May 2005 18:20:17 -0500, Alan W. Craft
<mauritius4@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 7 May 2005 22:43:13 +0100, Pat Winstanley <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> emanated:
In article <427d292c$0$2064$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk>,
michael.calwell@btopenworld.com says...
Yet you advocate that woman SHOULD be enslaved so that their bodies can
be used as incubators... regardless of the woman's wishes in the matter.
You are a hypocrite! ;-))
Uh no.
Uh yes.
You want women who are pregnant to be forced to continue those
pregnancies.
Yes...
...do the crime, do the time.
Alan
So you think men who get women pregnant should be medically
forced to carry the child to term, eh?
Interesting idea.
Apparently you're not very knowledgeable, let alone sympathetic
or forgiving, of the human male's inculpable sexual nature.
Rather, I think that if a woman doesn't wish to get pregnant in the
first place she should take those steps necessary to prevent it. She
has, above all, the greater reason, and therefore incentive, to so do.
Ah, but that's not always practical, is it?
First, the promenade, groomed and tarted...
Then, the heat of the moment beginning with the mixed, half-spent,
bodily-warmed scents of Soir de Paris and Royal Copenhagen...
Those little frilly underthings...
Alan
Let me guess - you typed that one handed.
Actually...with my nose.
Apparently you are the tart.
Would not "man" suffice, after all?
No. Coward. Slaver. Ignoramous. Worm. Yes.
That third one; that should be "ignoramus," gobshite.
So what *****-for-brains?
<snip>
Teething again, are we?
Alan
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing AbortionProtester |
07 May 2005 03:51:04 PM |
|
|
Michael Calwell <michael.calwell@btopenworld.com> wrote:
Pat Winstanley wrote:
In article <427ce0a1$0$2604$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk>,
michael.calwell@btopenworld.com says...
It's also unfair that your child could be dying of cancer and people
won't get off their asses and get tested so one could donate bone
marrow.
Unfortunately it's more unfair to enslave people for the use of their
bodies.
Oh I agree.
Yet you advocate that woman SHOULD be enslaved so that their bodies can
be used as incubators... regardless of the woman's wishes in the matter.
You are a hypocrite! ;-))
Uh no. The unborn child is the unfree one, ergo the unborn child is the
"enslaved".
Enslaved by you who doesn't want it set free.
The unborn child is unconscious and inconscious, so the
unborn child cannot "enslave" the person who conceived them of their own
free will.
But YOU can try to enslave pregnant women.
On the other hand, those people who put that child into the position
that they are in through no CHOICE of their own have a RESPONSIBILITY
Women aren't your slaves. You do not get to force people to obey you.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Calwell" |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing AbortionProtester |
07 May 2005 03:57:29 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
Michael Calwell <michael.calwell@btopenworld.com> wrote:
Pat Winstanley wrote:
In article <427ce0a1$0$2604$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk>,
michael.calwell@btopenworld.com says...
It's also unfair that your child could be dying of cancer and people
won't get off their asses and get tested so one could donate bone
marrow.
Unfortunately it's more unfair to enslave people for the use of their
bodies.
Oh I agree.
Yet you advocate that woman SHOULD be enslaved so that their bodies can
be used as incubators... regardless of the woman's wishes in the matter.
You are a hypocrite! ;-))
Uh no. The unborn child is the unfree one, ergo the unborn child is the
"enslaved".
Enslaved by you who doesn't want it set free.
The unborn child is unconscious and inconscious, so the
unborn child cannot "enslave" the person who conceived them of their own
free will.
But YOU can try to enslave pregnant women.
On the other hand, those people who put that child into the position
that they are in through no CHOICE of their own have a RESPONSIBILITY
Women aren't your slaves. You do not get to force people to obey you.
You are a pervert.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing AbortionProtester |
07 May 2005 05:25:24 PM |
|
|
Michael Calwell <michael.calwell@btopenworld.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Michael Calwell <michael.calwell@btopenworld.com> wrote:
Pat Winstanley wrote:
In article <427ce0a1$0$2604$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk>,
michael.calwell@btopenworld.com says...
It's also unfair that your child could be dying of cancer and people
won't get off their asses and get tested so one could donate bone
marrow.
Unfortunately it's more unfair to enslave people for the use of their
bodies.
Oh I agree.
Yet you advocate that woman SHOULD be enslaved so that their bodies can
be used as incubators... regardless of the woman's wishes in the matter.
You are a hypocrite! ;-))
Uh no. The unborn child is the unfree one, ergo the unborn child is the
"enslaved".
Enslaved by you who doesn't want it set free.
The unborn child is unconscious and inconscious, so the
unborn child cannot "enslave" the person who conceived them of their own
free will.
But YOU can try to enslave pregnant women.
On the other hand, those people who put that child into the position
that they are in through no CHOICE of their own have a RESPONSIBILITY
Women aren't your slaves. You do not get to force people to obey you.
You are a pervert.
Because I reject your immoral hatred of women and your corrupt lies?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Duca" |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for HarassingAbortion Protester |
07 May 2005 05:59:33 PM |
|
|
in article 427d292c$0$2064$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk, Michael Calwell at
michael.calwell@btopenworld.com wrote on 5/7/05 4:24 PM:
Pat Winstanley wrote:
In article <427ce0a1$0$2604$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk>,
michael.calwell@btopenworld.com says...
It's also unfair that your child could be dying of cancer and people
won't get off their asses and get tested so one could donate bone
marrow.
Unfortunately it's more unfair to enslave people for the use of their
bodies.
Oh I agree.
Yet you advocate that woman SHOULD be enslaved so that their bodies can
be used as incubators... regardless of the woman's wishes in the matter.
You are a hypocrite! ;-))
Uh no. The unborn child is the unfree one, ergo the unborn child is the
"enslaved". The unborn child is unconscious and inconscious, so the
unborn child cannot "enslave" the person who conceived them of their own
free will. Someone who has no choice or sentience cannot "enslave"
anyone else.
On the other hand, those people who put that child into the position
that they are in through no CHOICE of their own have a RESPONSIBILITY
and a DUTY towards them*, specifically not to do anything to
intentionally HARM or KILL them.
Because they expect a major payday from their God...or at least some
empty praise from what whatever schmuck in front of whose pulpit they
occasioally sit themselves.
Paul
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Calwell" |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing AbortionProtester |
07 May 2005 03:25:02 PM |
|
|
Pat Winstanley wrote:
In article <427ce0a1$0$2604$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk>,
michael.calwell@btopenworld.com says...
It's also unfair that your child could be dying of cancer and people
won't get off their asses and get tested so one could donate bone
marrow.
Unfortunately it's more unfair to enslave people for the use of their
bodies.
Oh I agree.
Yet you advocate that woman SHOULD be enslaved so that their bodies can
be used as incubators... regardless of the woman's wishes in the matter.
You are a hypocrite! ;-))
Uh no. The unborn child is the unfree one, ergo the unborn child is the
"enslaved". The unborn child is unconscious and inconscious, so the
unborn child cannot "enslave" the person who conceived them of their own
free will. Someone who has no choice or sentience cannot "enslave"
anyone else.
On the other hand, those people who put that child into the position
that they are in through no CHOICE of their own have a RESPONSIBILITY
and a DUTY towards them*, specifically not to do anything to
intentionally HARM or KILL them.
*Two words most pro-abortionists will not find in their vocabulary.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pat Winstanley" |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for Harassing Abortion Protester |
07 May 2005 04:44:44 PM |
|
|
In article <427d295f$0$2053$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk>,
michael.calwell@btopenworld.com says...
Yet you advocate that woman SHOULD be enslaved so that their bodies can
be used as incubators... regardless of the woman's wishes in the matter.
You are a hypocrite! ;-))
Uh no.
Uh, no... you advocate that women should be prevented from stopping
pregnancies from continuing... ie. you want them to be forced to use
their bodies as incubators against their wishes.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Duca" |
|
| Title: Re: Lawsuit Filed Against Planned Parenthood for HarassingAbortion Protester |
13 May 2005 09:23:53 PM |
|
|
in article 427d295f$0$2053$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk, Michael Calwell at
michael.calwell@btopenworld.com wrote on 5/7/05 4:25 PM:
Pat Winstanley wrote:
In article <427ce0a1$0$2604$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk>,
michael.calwell@btopenworld.com says...
It's also unfair that your child could be dying of cancer and people
won't get off their asses and get tested so one could donate bone
marrow.
Unfortunately it's more unfair to enslave people for the use of their
bodies.
Oh I agree.
Yet you advocate that woman SHOULD be enslaved so that their bodies can
be used as incubators... regardless of the woman's wishes in the matter.
You are a hypocrite! ;-))
Uh no. The unborn child is the unfree one, ergo the unborn child is the
"enslaved". The unborn child is unconscious and inconscious, so the
unborn child cannot "enslave" the person who conceived them of their own
free will. Someone who has no choice or sentience cannot "enslave"
anyone else.
On the other hand, those people who put that child into the position
that they are in through no CHOICE of their own have a RESPONSIBILITY
and a DUTY towards them*, specifically not to do anything to
intentionally HARM or KILL them.
*Two words most pro-abortionists will not find in their vocabulary.
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
