Religions > Atheism > Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Sound of Trumpet" |
| Date: |
19 Apr 2007 03:13:27 AM |
| Object: |
Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1819661/posts
Pro-homosexual Churches Begin Campaign of Misinformation on Biblical
Prohibitions against Sodomy
LifeSiteNews ^ | 4/18/07 | Peter J. Smith
Posted on 04/18/2007 4:41:56 PM PDT by wagglebee
INDIANAPOLIS, Indiana, April 18, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Several
homosexual "churches" in the Indianapolis area have begun a month-long
advertising campaign of misinformation to distort the clear biblical
prohibitions against homosexual behavior of Christian tradition.
The Jesus Metropolitan Community Church of Indianapolis, Faith In
America and Metropolitan Community Churches started the campaign this
week, placing five different billboards around the Indianapolis area
distorting the biblical foundation of Christianity's clear
prohibitions against sodomy.
The "Would Jesus Discriminate?" Campaign, funded nationally by Faith
in America, Inc., features such signs as "Jesus Affirmed a Gay
Couple": Matt. 8:5-13; "The Early Church Welcomed a Gay Man": Acts
8:26-40; "Jesus Said Some are Born Gay": Matt. 19:10-12; "Ruth Loved
Naomi as Adam Loved Eve", Gen. 2:24, Ruth 1:14; and "David Loved
Jonathan More than Women" II Sam 1:26.
The campaign perverts these Bible passages - known for thousands of
years in Christian and Jewish tradition to have nothing to do with
homosexuality - by reinterpreting them with meanings and connotations
that would have been alien to their scriptural authors and Jews and
Christians of the time.
Far from making exceptions for "loving gay relationships", Mosaic Law,
believed by Jews and Christians to have been given to Moses by God
Himself, severely condemns homosexual acts or sodomy in Leviticus 18
and carried the death penalty. The very name "sodomy" derived its name
from the Biblical city, Sodom, which God told Abraham he would destroy
for its unnatural crimes. Leviticus 18 is devoted to prohibitions
against adultery, incestuous relationships, and in fact, the
prohibition against homosexual behavior falls between verses
prohibiting bestiality and infant sacrifice.
Leviticus 18:22: "You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is
an abomination."
Leviticus 18:29-30: "For whoever shall do any of these abominations,
the persons that do them shall be cut off from among their people. So
keep my charge never to practice any of these abominable customs which
were practiced before you, and never to defile yourselves by them: I
am the LORD your God."
Both the immediate context of the Levitical passage and approximately
3500 years of Jewish and Christian tradition strongly refute the
contortions of "Would Jesus Discriminate?" campaign.
Early Christian teaching vigorously reaffirms Levitical proscriptions
against homosexual behavior in New Testament scripture (Rom. 1:21-29,
1 Cor. 6:9, Jude 1:7, 1 Tim 1:10). Contemporary extra-biblical
Christian writings, such as the Didache, also confirm the
understanding of the early Church that homosexual acts are
intrinsically disordered and destructive.
In an earlier interview with LifeSiteNews.com, orthodox Rabbi Yehuda
Levin explained that Jewish celebrations of Hannukah go back to a
struggle by Jews to defeat the pagan forces corrupting Jewish
society.
"The main celebration of Hanukkah was the defeat of the pagan forces
within Judaism, those who were attempting to paganize Judaism by aping
the Greek culture, and endorse all kinds of pagan rituals and pagan
ideologies including the practice of homosexuality," said Rabbi Levin.
.
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
20 Apr 2007 06:14:42 AM |
|
|
In News vd-dna_LmvMlp7XbnZ2dnUVZ_tmknZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News GYKdnVK7PKABrrXbnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News ycidnYmYA-8Ds7XbnZ2dnUVZ_qOpnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News mYidnVFaJZKluLXbnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News E_ednT9NWo0WvLXbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
DanielSan wrote:
Sound of Trumpet wrote:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1819661/posts
Pro-homosexual Churches Begin Campaign of Misinformation on
Biblical Prohibitions against Sodomy
Since our country is not based on Christian principles, this
is really irrelevant.
The U.S. was founded on Biblical principles.
Nonsense.
So you pray.
Do I know. The founding fathers knew it too. The U.S. is not
now, nor will it ever be, a Christian theocratic state.
You will be pleased to know, the U.S. is well on its way to
becoming a Secular theocratic state.
There is no such thing as a Secular theocratic state. The terms
are dyametrically opposed. You are either secular, or theocratic,
but never both. Our "state", our government is and well should be
secular. You theocrats had your shot at running things once. They
call it "The Dark Ages".
Secularism is a religion.
Not by any legal definition, IRS Code, or Supreme Court ruling.
I see you haven't read your Humanist Manifesto:
Not required. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful legal
definition.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Jose Lorr" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying BiblicalProhibitions Against Sodomy |
20 Apr 2007 10:11:11 AM |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
In News vd-dna_LmvMlp7XbnZ2dnUVZ_tmknZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News GYKdnVK7PKABrrXbnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News ycidnYmYA-8Ds7XbnZ2dnUVZ_qOpnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News mYidnVFaJZKluLXbnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News E_ednT9NWo0WvLXbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
DanielSan wrote:
Sound of Trumpet wrote:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1819661/posts
Pro-homosexual Churches Begin Campaign of Misinformation on
Biblical Prohibitions against Sodomy
Since our country is not based on Christian principles, this
is really irrelevant.
The U.S. was founded on Biblical principles.
Nonsense.
So you pray.
Do I know. The founding fathers knew it too. The U.S. is not
now, nor will it ever be, a Christian theocratic state.
You will be pleased to know, the U.S. is well on its way to
becoming a Secular theocratic state.
There is no such thing as a Secular theocratic state. The terms
are dyametrically opposed. You are either secular, or theocratic,
but never both. Our "state", our government is and well should be
secular. You theocrats had your shot at running things once. They
call it "The Dark Ages".
Secularism is a religion.
Not by any legal definition, IRS Code, or Supreme Court ruling.
I see you haven't read your Humanist Manifesto:
Not required. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful legal
definition.
I see, you decide what is meaningful and not. LOL
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
20 Apr 2007 08:15:52 PM |
|
|
In News nrqdnefba6KSRbXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News vd-dna_LmvMlp7XbnZ2dnUVZ_tmknZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News GYKdnVK7PKABrrXbnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News ycidnYmYA-8Ds7XbnZ2dnUVZ_qOpnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News mYidnVFaJZKluLXbnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News E_ednT9NWo0WvLXbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy
Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
DanielSan wrote:
Sound of Trumpet wrote:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1819661/posts
Pro-homosexual Churches Begin Campaign of Misinformation
on Biblical Prohibitions against Sodomy
Since our country is not based on Christian principles,
this is really irrelevant.
The U.S. was founded on Biblical principles.
Nonsense.
So you pray.
Do I know. The founding fathers knew it too. The U.S. is not
now, nor will it ever be, a Christian theocratic state.
You will be pleased to know, the U.S. is well on its way to
becoming a Secular theocratic state.
There is no such thing as a Secular theocratic state. The terms
are dyametrically opposed. You are either secular, or
theocratic, but never both. Our "state", our government is
and well should be secular. You theocrats had your shot at
running things once. They call it "The Dark Ages".
Secularism is a religion.
Not by any legal definition, IRS Code, or Supreme Court ruling.
I see you haven't read your Humanist Manifesto:
Not required. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful legal
definition.
I see, you decide what is meaningful and not. LOL
No, the law does. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful legal
definition.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Jose Lorr" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying BiblicalProhibitions Against Sodomy |
20 Apr 2007 10:02:04 PM |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
In News nrqdnefba6KSRbXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News vd-dna_LmvMlp7XbnZ2dnUVZ_tmknZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News GYKdnVK7PKABrrXbnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News ycidnYmYA-8Ds7XbnZ2dnUVZ_qOpnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News mYidnVFaJZKluLXbnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News E_ednT9NWo0WvLXbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy
Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
DanielSan wrote:
Sound of Trumpet wrote:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1819661/posts
Pro-homosexual Churches Begin Campaign of Misinformation
on Biblical Prohibitions against Sodomy
Since our country is not based on Christian principles,
this is really irrelevant.
The U.S. was founded on Biblical principles.
Nonsense.
So you pray.
Do I know. The founding fathers knew it too. The U.S. is not
now, nor will it ever be, a Christian theocratic state.
You will be pleased to know, the U.S. is well on its way to
becoming a Secular theocratic state.
There is no such thing as a Secular theocratic state. The terms
are dyametrically opposed. You are either secular, or
theocratic, but never both. Our "state", our government is
and well should be secular. You theocrats had your shot at
running things once. They call it "The Dark Ages".
Secularism is a religion.
Not by any legal definition, IRS Code, or Supreme Court ruling.
I see you haven't read your Humanist Manifesto:
Not required. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful legal
definition.
I see, you decide what is meaningful and not. LOL
No, the law does. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful legal
definition.
See if you can get this out of your craw:
WND LAW OF THE LAND
Court rules atheism a religion
Decides 1st Amendment protects prison inmate's right to
start study group
Posted: August 20, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45874
A federal court of appeals ruled yesterday Wisconsin prison
officials violated an inmate's rights because they did not
treat atheism as a religion.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
20 Apr 2007 10:05:55 PM |
|
|
In News M8ydnbXJE5ND47TbnZ2dnUVZ_uOmnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News nrqdnefba6KSRbXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
I see, you decide what is meaningful and not. LOL
No, the law does. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful
legal definition.
See if you can get this out of your craw:
WND LAW OF THE LAND
Court rules atheism a religion
Decides 1st Amendment protects prison inmate's right to
start study group
Posted: August 20, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
A. World nutter daily isn't a valid source for anything but religious
tripe, it's little wonder that you would try to use it.
B. Atheism has never been ruled a relgion.
C. Atheism and secularism are two different things. We were talking about
Secularism, not Atheism, and neither have ever been ruled a relgion.
D. Try again.
There, seems to be out of my craw quite well.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Jose Lorr" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying BiblicalProhibitions Against Sodomy |
20 Apr 2007 10:40:34 PM |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
In News M8ydnbXJE5ND47TbnZ2dnUVZ_uOmnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News nrqdnefba6KSRbXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
I see, you decide what is meaningful and not. LOL
No, the law does. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful
legal definition.
See if you can get this out of your craw:
WND LAW OF THE LAND
Court rules atheism a religion
Decides 1st Amendment protects prison inmate's right to
start study group
Posted: August 20, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
A. World nutter daily isn't a valid source for anything but religious
tripe, it's little wonder that you would try to use it.
Whatever you think of WND its the law.
B. Atheism has never been ruled a relgion.
You have the balls to deny what's in black and white? I
guess you do, being the good little aparatchik you are.
C. Atheism and secularism are two different things. We were talking about
Secularism, not Atheism, and neither have ever been ruled a relgion.
Secularism is merely one tentacle of Atheism.
D. Try again.
LOL
There, seems to be out of my craw quite well.
In your dreams.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
20 Apr 2007 11:33:08 PM |
|
|
In News SIudnefHRKR7GrTbnZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News M8ydnbXJE5ND47TbnZ2dnUVZ_uOmnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News nrqdnefba6KSRbXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
I see, you decide what is meaningful and not. LOL
No, the law does. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful
legal definition.
See if you can get this out of your craw:
WND LAW OF THE LAND
Court rules atheism a religion
Decides 1st Amendment protects prison inmate's right to
start study group
Posted: August 20, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
A. World nutter daily isn't a valid source for anything but
religious tripe, it's little wonder that you would try to use it.
Whatever you think of WND its the law.
WND is not law, nor was Atheism declared a religion in that case.
B. Atheism has never been ruled a relgion.
You have the balls to deny what's in black and white? I
guess you do, being the good little aparatchik you are.
Have you read the case? I don't mean WNUTD's interpretation of the case, I
mean the actual case. I have, and Atheism was not declared a religion.
C. Atheism and secularism are two different things. We were talking
about Secularism, not Atheism, and neither have ever been ruled a
relgion.
Secularism is merely one tentacle of Atheism.
Nonsense. Secularism and Atheism are two seperate things.
D. Try again.
LOL
There, seems to be out of my craw quite well.
In your dreams.
No, in reality.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Jose Lorr" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying BiblicalProhibitions Against Sodomy |
22 Apr 2007 04:31:44 PM |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
In News SIudnefHRKR7GrTbnZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News M8ydnbXJE5ND47TbnZ2dnUVZ_uOmnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News nrqdnefba6KSRbXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
I see, you decide what is meaningful and not. LOL
No, the law does. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful
legal definition.
See if you can get this out of your craw:
WND LAW OF THE LAND
Court rules atheism a religion
Decides 1st Amendment protects prison inmate's right to
start study group
Posted: August 20, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
A. World nutter daily isn't a valid source for anything but
religious tripe, it's little wonder that you would try to use it.
Whatever you think of WND its the law.
WND is not law,
Very funny.
nor was Atheism declared a religion in that case.
Riight, deny what's in black and white... typical marxist
dialectic.
B. Atheism has never been ruled a relgion.
You have the balls to deny what's in black and white? I
guess you do, being the good little aparatchik you are.
Have you read the case? I don't mean WNUTD's interpretation of the case, I
mean the actual case. I have, and Atheism was not declared a religion.
This is an old dispute, settled once and for all... Atheism
was judged by a US court to be a religion.
C. Atheism and secularism are two different things. We were talking
about Secularism, not Atheism, and neither have ever been ruled a
relgion.
Secularism is merely one tentacle of Atheism.
Nonsense. Secularism and Atheism are two seperate things.
Nonsense.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
22 Apr 2007 06:37:08 PM |
|
|
In News numdnV_qdtFjTrbbnZ2dnUVZ_hKdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News SIudnefHRKR7GrTbnZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News M8ydnbXJE5ND47TbnZ2dnUVZ_uOmnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News nrqdnefba6KSRbXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
I see, you decide what is meaningful and not. LOL
No, the law does. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful
legal definition.
See if you can get this out of your craw:
WND LAW OF THE LAND
Court rules atheism a religion
Decides 1st Amendment protects prison inmate's right to
start study group
Posted: August 20, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
A. World nutter daily isn't a valid source for anything but
religious tripe, it's little wonder that you would try to use it.
Whatever you think of WND its the law.
WND is not law,
Very funny.
Typically idiotic.
nor was Atheism declared a religion in that case.
Riight, deny what's in black and white... typical marxist
dialectic.
Nope. Atheism has not been declared a religion, nor is Atheism what we were
discussing. Secularism was what we were discussing, and secularism does not
equal Atheism.
B. Atheism has never been ruled a relgion.
You have the balls to deny what's in black and white? I
guess you do, being the good little aparatchik you are.
Have you read the case? I don't mean WNUTD's interpretation of the
case, I mean the actual case. I have, and Atheism was not declared
a religion.
This is an old dispute, settled once and for all... Atheism
was judged by a US court to be a religion.
Nonsense.
C. Atheism and secularism are two different things. We were
talking about Secularism, not Atheism, and neither have ever been
ruled a relgion.
Secularism is merely one tentacle of Atheism.
Nonsense. Secularism and Atheism are two seperate things.
Nonsense.
No, it's quite true.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Jose Lorr" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying BiblicalProhibitions Against Sodomy |
22 Apr 2007 09:02:31 PM |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
In News numdnV_qdtFjTrbbnZ2dnUVZ_hKdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News SIudnefHRKR7GrTbnZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News M8ydnbXJE5ND47TbnZ2dnUVZ_uOmnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News nrqdnefba6KSRbXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
I see, you decide what is meaningful and not. LOL
No, the law does. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful
legal definition.
See if you can get this out of your craw:
WND LAW OF THE LAND
Court rules atheism a religion
Decides 1st Amendment protects prison inmate's right to
start study group
Posted: August 20, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
A. World nutter daily isn't a valid source for anything but
religious tripe, it's little wonder that you would try to use it.
Whatever you think of WND its the law.
WND is not law,
Very funny.
Typically idiotic.
nor was Atheism declared a religion in that case.
Riight, deny what's in black and white... typical marxist
dialectic.
Nope. Atheism has not been declared a religion, nor is Atheism what we were
discussing. Secularism was what we were discussing, and secularism does not
equal Atheism.
B. Atheism has never been ruled a relgion.
You have the balls to deny what's in black and white? I
guess you do, being the good little aparatchik you are.
Have you read the case? I don't mean WNUTD's interpretation of the
case, I mean the actual case. I have, and Atheism was not declared
a religion.
This is an old dispute, settled once and for all... Atheism
was judged by a US court to be a religion.
Nonsense.
C. Atheism and secularism are two different things. We were
talking about Secularism, not Atheism, and neither have ever been
ruled a relgion.
Secularism is merely one tentacle of Atheism.
Nonsense. Secularism and Atheism are two seperate things.
Nonsense.
No, it's quite true.
Secularism and Atheism are two heads of the same
monster/idolatry.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
22 Apr 2007 09:23:27 PM |
|
|
In News BvqdnVbrSNbvjrHbnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News numdnV_qdtFjTrbbnZ2dnUVZ_hKdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News SIudnefHRKR7GrTbnZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News M8ydnbXJE5ND47TbnZ2dnUVZ_uOmnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News nrqdnefba6KSRbXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
I see, you decide what is meaningful and not. LOL
No, the law does. Secularism is not a religion by any
meaningful legal definition.
See if you can get this out of your craw:
WND LAW OF THE LAND
Court rules atheism a religion
Decides 1st Amendment protects prison inmate's right to
start study group
Posted: August 20, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
A. World nutter daily isn't a valid source for anything but
religious tripe, it's little wonder that you would try to use it.
Whatever you think of WND its the law.
WND is not law,
Very funny.
Typically idiotic.
nor was Atheism declared a religion in that case.
Riight, deny what's in black and white... typical marxist
dialectic.
Nope. Atheism has not been declared a religion, nor is Atheism what
we were discussing. Secularism was what we were discussing, and
secularism does not equal Atheism.
B. Atheism has never been ruled a relgion.
You have the balls to deny what's in black and white? I
guess you do, being the good little aparatchik you are.
Have you read the case? I don't mean WNUTD's interpretation of the
case, I mean the actual case. I have, and Atheism was not declared
a religion.
This is an old dispute, settled once and for all... Atheism
was judged by a US court to be a religion.
Nonsense.
C. Atheism and secularism are two different things. We were
talking about Secularism, not Atheism, and neither have ever been
ruled a relgion.
Secularism is merely one tentacle of Atheism.
Nonsense. Secularism and Atheism are two seperate things.
Nonsense.
No, it's quite true.
Secularism and Atheism are two heads of the same
monster/idolatry.
Nonsense. Secularism and Atheism are to entirely different things.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Jose Lorr" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying BiblicalProhibitions Against Sodomy |
23 Apr 2007 01:21:53 AM |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
In News BvqdnVbrSNbvjrHbnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News numdnV_qdtFjTrbbnZ2dnUVZ_hKdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News SIudnefHRKR7GrTbnZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News M8ydnbXJE5ND47TbnZ2dnUVZ_uOmnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News nrqdnefba6KSRbXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
I see, you decide what is meaningful and not. LOL
No, the law does. Secularism is not a religion by any
meaningful legal definition.
See if you can get this out of your craw:
WND LAW OF THE LAND
Court rules atheism a religion
Decides 1st Amendment protects prison inmate's right to
start study group
Posted: August 20, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
A. World nutter daily isn't a valid source for anything but
religious tripe, it's little wonder that you would try to use it.
Whatever you think of WND its the law.
WND is not law,
Very funny.
Typically idiotic.
nor was Atheism declared a religion in that case.
Riight, deny what's in black and white... typical marxist
dialectic.
Nope. Atheism has not been declared a religion, nor is Atheism what
we were discussing. Secularism was what we were discussing, and
secularism does not equal Atheism.
B. Atheism has never been ruled a relgion.
You have the balls to deny what's in black and white? I
guess you do, being the good little aparatchik you are.
Have you read the case? I don't mean WNUTD's interpretation of the
case, I mean the actual case. I have, and Atheism was not declared
a religion.
This is an old dispute, settled once and for all... Atheism
was judged by a US court to be a religion.
Nonsense.
C. Atheism and secularism are two different things. We were
talking about Secularism, not Atheism, and neither have ever been
ruled a relgion.
Secularism is merely one tentacle of Atheism.
Nonsense. Secularism and Atheism are two seperate things.
Nonsense.
No, it's quite true.
Secularism and Atheism are two heads of the same
monster/idolatry.
Nonsense. Secularism and Atheism are to entirely different things.
Nonsense. They are interdependent.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
23 Apr 2007 06:14:06 AM |
|
|
In News _bOdnRo-HpHCzbHbnZ2dnUVZ_h3inZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News BvqdnVbrSNbvjrHbnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News numdnV_qdtFjTrbbnZ2dnUVZ_hKdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News SIudnefHRKR7GrTbnZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News M8ydnbXJE5ND47TbnZ2dnUVZ_uOmnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News nrqdnefba6KSRbXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy
Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
I see, you decide what is meaningful and not. LOL
No, the law does. Secularism is not a religion by any
meaningful legal definition.
See if you can get this out of your craw:
WND LAW OF THE LAND
Court rules atheism a religion
Decides 1st Amendment protects prison inmate's right to
start study group
Posted: August 20, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
A. World nutter daily isn't a valid source for anything but
religious tripe, it's little wonder that you would try to use
it.
Whatever you think of WND its the law.
WND is not law,
Very funny.
Typically idiotic.
nor was Atheism declared a religion in that case.
Riight, deny what's in black and white... typical marxist
dialectic.
Nope. Atheism has not been declared a religion, nor is Atheism
what we were discussing. Secularism was what we were discussing,
and secularism does not equal Atheism.
B. Atheism has never been ruled a relgion.
You have the balls to deny what's in black and white? I
guess you do, being the good little aparatchik you are.
Have you read the case? I don't mean WNUTD's interpretation of
the case, I mean the actual case. I have, and Atheism was not
declared a religion.
This is an old dispute, settled once and for all... Atheism
was judged by a US court to be a religion.
Nonsense.
C. Atheism and secularism are two different things. We were
talking about Secularism, not Atheism, and neither have ever
been ruled a relgion.
Secularism is merely one tentacle of Atheism.
Nonsense. Secularism and Atheism are two seperate things.
Nonsense.
No, it's quite true.
Secularism and Atheism are two heads of the same
monster/idolatry.
Nonsense. Secularism and Atheism are to entirely different things.
Nonsense. They are interdependent.
Not even remotely. One can be highly religious, but believe in a secular
government. Secularism and Atheism are to entirely different things.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Jose Lorr" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying BiblicalProhibitions Against Sodomy |
23 Apr 2007 03:45:19 PM |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
In News _bOdnRo-HpHCzbHbnZ2dnUVZ_h3inZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News BvqdnVbrSNbvjrHbnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News numdnV_qdtFjTrbbnZ2dnUVZ_hKdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News SIudnefHRKR7GrTbnZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News M8ydnbXJE5ND47TbnZ2dnUVZ_uOmnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News nrqdnefba6KSRbXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy
Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
I see, you decide what is meaningful and not. LOL
No, the law does. Secularism is not a religion by any
meaningful legal definition.
See if you can get this out of your craw:
WND LAW OF THE LAND
Court rules atheism a religion
Decides 1st Amendment protects prison inmate's right to
start study group
Posted: August 20, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
A. World nutter daily isn't a valid source for anything but
religious tripe, it's little wonder that you would try to use
it.
Whatever you think of WND its the law.
WND is not law,
Very funny.
Typically idiotic.
nor was Atheism declared a religion in that case.
Riight, deny what's in black and white... typical marxist
dialectic.
Nope. Atheism has not been declared a religion, nor is Atheism
what we were discussing. Secularism was what we were discussing,
and secularism does not equal Atheism.
B. Atheism has never been ruled a relgion.
You have the balls to deny what's in black and white? I
guess you do, being the good little aparatchik you are.
Have you read the case? I don't mean WNUTD's interpretation of
the case, I mean the actual case. I have, and Atheism was not
declared a religion.
This is an old dispute, settled once and for all... Atheism
was judged by a US court to be a religion.
Nonsense.
C. Atheism and secularism are two different things. We were
talking about Secularism, not Atheism, and neither have ever
been ruled a relgion.
Secularism is merely one tentacle of Atheism.
Nonsense. Secularism and Atheism are two seperate things.
Nonsense.
No, it's quite true.
Secularism and Atheism are two heads of the same
monster/idolatry.
Nonsense. Secularism and Atheism are to entirely different things.
Nonsense. They are interdependent.
Not even remotely. One can be highly religious, but believe in a secular
government. Secularism and Atheism are to entirely different things.
Secularism and Atheism are entirely interdependent.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
23 Apr 2007 04:19:00 PM |
|
|
In News 9qidnUtng_Rvh7DbnZ2dnUVZ_rrinZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News _bOdnRo-HpHCzbHbnZ2dnUVZ_h3inZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News BvqdnVbrSNbvjrHbnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News numdnV_qdtFjTrbbnZ2dnUVZ_hKdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News SIudnefHRKR7GrTbnZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News M8ydnbXJE5ND47TbnZ2dnUVZ_uOmnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy
Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News nrqdnefba6KSRbXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy
Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
I see, you decide what is meaningful and not. LOL
No, the law does. Secularism is not a religion by any
meaningful legal definition.
See if you can get this out of your craw:
WND LAW OF THE LAND
Court rules atheism a religion
Decides 1st Amendment protects prison inmate's right to
start study group
Posted: August 20, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
A. World nutter daily isn't a valid source for anything but
religious tripe, it's little wonder that you would try to use
it.
Whatever you think of WND its the law.
WND is not law,
Very funny.
Typically idiotic.
nor was Atheism declared a religion in that case.
Riight, deny what's in black and white... typical marxist
dialectic.
Nope. Atheism has not been declared a religion, nor is Atheism
what we were discussing. Secularism was what we were discussing,
and secularism does not equal Atheism.
B. Atheism has never been ruled a relgion.
You have the balls to deny what's in black and white? I
guess you do, being the good little aparatchik you are.
Have you read the case? I don't mean WNUTD's interpretation of
the case, I mean the actual case. I have, and Atheism was not
declared a religion.
This is an old dispute, settled once and for all... Atheism
was judged by a US court to be a religion.
Nonsense.
C. Atheism and secularism are two different things. We were
talking about Secularism, not Atheism, and neither have ever
been ruled a relgion.
Secularism is merely one tentacle of Atheism.
Nonsense. Secularism and Atheism are two seperate things.
Nonsense.
No, it's quite true.
Secularism and Atheism are two heads of the same
monster/idolatry.
Nonsense. Secularism and Atheism are to entirely different things.
Nonsense. They are interdependent.
Not even remotely. One can be highly religious, but believe in a
secular government. Secularism and Atheism are to entirely
different things.
Secularism and Atheism are entirely interdependent.
Not even remotely. To say so just shows how stupid you really are.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Jose Lorr" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying BiblicalProhibitions Against Sodomy |
24 Apr 2007 01:32:56 AM |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 9qidnUtng_Rvh7DbnZ2dnUVZ_rrinZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News _bOdnRo-HpHCzbHbnZ2dnUVZ_h3inZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News BvqdnVbrSNbvjrHbnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News numdnV_qdtFjTrbbnZ2dnUVZ_hKdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News SIudnefHRKR7GrTbnZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News M8ydnbXJE5ND47TbnZ2dnUVZ_uOmnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy
Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News nrqdnefba6KSRbXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy
Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
I see, you decide what is meaningful and not. LOL
No, the law does. Secularism is not a religion by any
meaningful legal definition.
See if you can get this out of your craw:
WND LAW OF THE LAND
Court rules atheism a religion
Decides 1st Amendment protects prison inmate's right to
start study group
Posted: August 20, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
A. World nutter daily isn't a valid source for anything but
religious tripe, it's little wonder that you would try to use
it.
Whatever you think of WND its the law.
WND is not law,
Very funny.
Typically idiotic.
nor was Atheism declared a religion in that case.
Riight, deny what's in black and white... typical marxist
dialectic.
Nope. Atheism has not been declared a religion, nor is Atheism
what we were discussing. Secularism was what we were discussing,
and secularism does not equal Atheism.
B. Atheism has never been ruled a relgion.
You have the balls to deny what's in black and white? I
guess you do, being the good little aparatchik you are.
Have you read the case? I don't mean WNUTD's interpretation of
the case, I mean the actual case. I have, and Atheism was not
declared a religion.
This is an old dispute, settled once and for all... Atheism
was judged by a US court to be a religion.
Nonsense.
C. Atheism and secularism are two different things. We were
talking about Secularism, not Atheism, and neither have ever
been ruled a relgion.
Secularism is merely one tentacle of Atheism.
Nonsense. Secularism and Atheism are two seperate things.
Nonsense.
No, it's quite true.
Secularism and Atheism are two heads of the same
monster/idolatry.
Nonsense. Secularism and Atheism are to entirely different things.
Nonsense. They are interdependent.
Not even remotely. One can be highly religious, but believe in a
secular government. Secularism and Atheism are to entirely
different things.
Secularism and Atheism are entirely interdependent.
Not even remotely. To say so just shows how stupid you really are.
Envy suits you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
24 Apr 2007 05:56:29 AM |
|
|
In News c4ydnT5F7JcoObDbnZ2dnUVZ_qHinZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 9qidnUtng_Rvh7DbnZ2dnUVZ_rrinZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News _bOdnRo-HpHCzbHbnZ2dnUVZ_h3inZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News BvqdnVbrSNbvjrHbnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News numdnV_qdtFjTrbbnZ2dnUVZ_hKdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News SIudnefHRKR7GrTbnZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy
Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News M8ydnbXJE5ND47TbnZ2dnUVZ_uOmnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy
Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News nrqdnefba6KSRbXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@comcast.com,,
Roy Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
I see, you decide what is meaningful and not. LOL
No, the law does. Secularism is not a religion by any
meaningful legal definition.
See if you can get this out of your craw:
WND LAW OF THE LAND
Court rules atheism a religion
Decides 1st Amendment protects prison inmate's right to
start study group
Posted: August 20, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
A. World nutter daily isn't a valid source for anything
but religious tripe, it's little wonder that you would try
to use it.
Whatever you think of WND its the law.
WND is not law,
Very funny.
Typically idiotic.
nor was Atheism declared a religion in that case.
Riight, deny what's in black and white... typical marxist
dialectic.
Nope. Atheism has not been declared a religion, nor is Atheism
what we were discussing. Secularism was what we were
discussing, and secularism does not equal Atheism.
B. Atheism has never been ruled a relgion.
You have the balls to deny what's in black and white? I
guess you do, being the good little aparatchik you are.
Have you read the case? I don't mean WNUTD's interpretation
of the case, I mean the actual case. I have, and Atheism
was not declared a religion.
This is an old dispute, settled once and for all... Atheism
was judged by a US court to be a religion.
Nonsense.
C. Atheism and secularism are two different things. We
were talking about Secularism, not Atheism, and neither
have ever been ruled a relgion.
Secularism is merely one tentacle of Atheism.
Nonsense. Secularism and Atheism are two seperate things.
Nonsense.
No, it's quite true.
Secularism and Atheism are two heads of the same
monster/idolatry.
Nonsense. Secularism and Atheism are to entirely different
things.
Nonsense. They are interdependent.
Not even remotely. One can be highly religious, but believe in a
secular government. Secularism and Atheism are to entirely
different things.
Secularism and Atheism are entirely interdependent.
Not even remotely. To say so just shows how stupid you really are.
Envy suits you.
Stupidity is your creed.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "bob&carole" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
21 Apr 2007 08:47:20 AM |
|
|
On Apr 21, 12:33=EF=BF=BDam, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News SIudnefHRKR7GrTbnZ2dnUVZ_i2dn...@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Ken...@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News M8ydnbXJE5ND47TbnZ2dnUVZ_uOmn...@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Ken...@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News nrqdnefba6KSRbXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dn...@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Ken...@comcast.net, typed this:
I see, you decide what is meaningful and not. =A0LOL
No, the law does. =A0Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful
legal definition.
See if you can get this out of your craw:
WND LAW OF THE LAND
Court rules atheism a religion
Decides 1st Amendment protects prison inmate's right to
start study group
Posted: August 20, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
=A9 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
A. =A0World nutter daily isn't a valid source for anything but
religious tripe, it's little wonder that you would try to use it.
Whatever you think of WND its the law.
WND is not law, nor was Atheism declared a religion in that case.
B. Atheism has never been ruled a relgion.
You have the balls to deny what's in black and white? =A0I
guess you do, being the good little aparatchik you are.
Have you read the case? =A0I don't mean WNUTD's interpretation of the cas=
e, I
mean the actual case. =A0I have, and Atheism was not declared a religion.
C. Atheism and secularism are two different things. =A0We were talking
about Secularism, not Atheism, and neither have ever been ruled a
relgion.
Secularism is merely one tentacle of Atheism.
Nonsense. =A0Secularism and Atheism are two seperate things.
D. Try again.
LOL
There, seems to be out of my craw quite well.
In your dreams.
No, in reality.
Begone, you k00ky little queer...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
21 Apr 2007 08:50:08 AM |
|
|
In News 1177163240.435019.167030@b58g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,, bob&carole
at bobandcarole222@hotmail.com, typed this:
I'll Begone, I'm a k00ky little queer...
Yes, you are.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Jose Lorr" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying BiblicalProhibitions Against Sodomy |
22 Apr 2007 04:34:41 PM |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1177163240.435019.167030@b58g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,, bob&carole
at bobandcarole222@hotmail.com, typed this:
I'll Begone, I'm a k00ky little queer...
Yes, you are.
Why do you do that... take people's words and rewrite them?
Not nice.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
22 Apr 2007 06:39:01 PM |
|
|
In News numdnV7qdtE3SbbbnZ2dnUVZ_hKdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1177163240.435019.167030@b58g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,,
bob&carole at bobandcarole222@hotmail.com, typed this:
I'll Begone, I'm a k00ky little queer...
Yes, you are.
Why do you do that...
To ***** him off, he seems to like it. Besides, nothing he has ever said has
warranted a serious response. Sometimes I get him on the leash and write a
quick script to auto answer his posts. He once argued with my bot for eight
days. Now you have to admit, that's comedy!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Jose Lorr" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying BiblicalProhibitions Against Sodomy |
22 Apr 2007 09:04:39 PM |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
In News numdnV7qdtE3SbbbnZ2dnUVZ_hKdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1177163240.435019.167030@b58g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,,
bob&carole at bobandcarole222@hotmail.com, typed this:
I'll Begone, I'm a k00ky little queer...
Yes, you are.
Why do you do that...
To ***** him off, he seems to like it. Besides, nothing he has ever said has
warranted a serious response. Sometimes I get him on the leash and write a
quick script to auto answer his posts. He once argued with my bot for eight
days. Now you have to admit, that's comedy!
No, I think its sick... on your part.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
22 Apr 2007 09:24:14 PM |
|
|
In News BvqdnVHrSNZvjrHbnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News numdnV7qdtE3SbbbnZ2dnUVZ_hKdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1177163240.435019.167030@b58g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,,
bob&carole at bobandcarole222@hotmail.com, typed this:
I'll Begone, I'm a k00ky little queer...
Yes, you are.
Why do you do that...
To ***** him off, he seems to like it. Besides, nothing he has ever
said has warranted a serious response. Sometimes I get him on the
leash and write a quick script to auto answer his posts. He once
argued with my bot for eight days. Now you have to admit, that's
comedy!
No, I think its sick... on your part.
LOL! Not that it means anything to me what you think. You're so stupid you
thing Atheism and Secularism are the same thing.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "bob&carole" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
22 Apr 2007 06:48:31 PM |
|
|
On Apr 22, 7:39=EF=BF=BDpm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News numdnV7qdtE3SbbbnZ2dnUVZ_hKdn...@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Ken...@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1177163240.435019.167...@b58g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,,
bob&carole at bobandcarole...@hotmail.com, typed this:
I'll Begone, I'm a k00ky little queer...
Yes, you are.
Why do you do that...
To ***** him off,
Well it aint workin, *****
he seems to like it. =EF=BF=BDBesides, nothing he has ever said has
warranted a serious response.
AS if YOU had a serius response to give....
=EF=BF=BD Sometimes I get him on the leash and write a
quick script to auto answer his posts. =A0He once argued with my bot for =
eight
days. =A0Now you have to admit, that's comedy!
Lying suits you...LOL
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
22 Apr 2007 06:51:29 PM |
|
|
In News 1177285711.819051.263720@b58g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,, bob&carole
at bobandcarole555@hotmail.com, typed this:
On Apr 22, 7:39?pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News numdnV7qdtE3SbbbnZ2dnUVZ_hKdn...@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Ken...@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1177163240.435019.167...@b58g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,,
bob&carole at bobandcarole...@hotmail.com, typed this:
I'll Begone, I'm a k00ky little queer...
Yes, you are.
Why do you do that...
To ***** him off,
Well it aint workin, *****
LOL! I can tell by your reaction that it works quite well.
he seems to like it. ?Besides, nothing he has ever said has
warranted a serious response.
AS if YOU had a serius response to give....
Not for assholes like you, certainly.
? Sometimes I get him on the leash and write a
quick script to auto answer his posts. He once argued with my bot
for eight days. Now you have to admit, that's comedy!
Lying suits you...LOL
Denial isn't just a river in Egypt, is it?
C'mon! Jump! Sit up and beg! That's a good dog...
.
|
|
|
| User: "bob&carole" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
22 Apr 2007 07:03:26 PM |
|
|
On Apr 22, 7:51=EF=BF=BDpm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1177285711.819051.263...@b58g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,, bob&carole
at bobandcarole...@hotmail.com, typed this:
On Apr 22, 7:39?pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News numdnV7qdtE3SbbbnZ2dnUVZ_hKdn...@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Ken...@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1177163240.435019.167...@b58g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,,
bob&carole at bobandcarole...@hotmail.com, typed this:
I'll Begone, I'm a k00ky little queer...
Yes, you are.
Why do you do that...
To ***** him off,
Well it aint workin, *****
LOL! =A0I can tell by your reaction that it works quite well.
You don't have the cranial capacity
to ***** me off.
=A0he seems to like it. ?Besides, nothing he has ever said has
warranted a serious response.
AS if YOU had a serius response to give....
Not for assholes like you, certainly.
Translation: "I'm scared of Bob"
? Sometimes I get him on the leash and write a
quick script to auto answer his posts. He once argued with my bot
for eight days. Now you have to admit, that's comedy!
Lying suits you...LOL
Denial isn't just a river in Egypt, is it?
C'mon! =A0Jump! =A0Sit up and beg! =A0That's a good dog...
LOL..I've had you stepping and fetching for me ever since you
slithered in here, *****. You're too bone fuckin stupid to see it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
22 Apr 2007 07:05:55 PM |
|
|
In News 1177286606.133916.14800@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com,, bob&carole at
bobandcarole666@hotmail.com, typed this:
On Apr 22, 7:51?pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1177285711.819051.263...@b58g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,,
bob&carole at bobandcarole...@hotmail.com, typed this:
On Apr 22, 7:39?pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News numdnV7qdtE3SbbbnZ2dnUVZ_hKdn...@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Ken...@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1177163240.435019.167...@b58g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,,
bob&carole at bobandcarole...@hotmail.com, typed this:
I'll Begone, I'm a k00ky little queer...
Yes, you are.
Why do you do that...
To ***** him off,
Well it aint workin, *****
LOL! I can tell by your reaction that it works quite well.
You don't have the cranial capacity
to ***** me off.
Suureee. LOL! We can see you getting more ***** with every post.
he seems to like it. ?Besides, nothing he has ever said has
warranted a serious response.
AS if YOU had a serius response to give....
Not for assholes like you, certainly.
Translation: "I'm scared of Bob"
LOL! There's nothing about bob and his packmule carlos that would scare
anyone.
? Sometimes I get him on the leash and write a
quick script to auto answer his posts. He once argued with my bot
for eight days. Now you have to admit, that's comedy!
Lying suits you...LOL
Denial isn't just a river in Egypt, is it?
C'mon! Jump! Sit up and beg! That's a good dog...
LOL
Yep! That's a good dog bob! Keep fetching for me! Here, get the stick
boy! Hahahahahahaha!
.
|
|
|
| User: "ScottyFLL" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
22 Apr 2007 07:13:11 PM |
|
|
On Apr 22, 8:05 pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
LOL! There's nothing about bob and his packmule carlos that would scare
anyone.
I'm afraid of coming in contact with whatever is causing his
putrescence.
.
|
|
|
| User: "bobandcarole" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
