Religions > Atheism > Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Sound of Trumpet" |
| Date: |
19 Apr 2007 03:13:27 AM |
| Object: |
Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1819661/posts
Pro-homosexual Churches Begin Campaign of Misinformation on Biblical
Prohibitions against Sodomy
LifeSiteNews ^ | 4/18/07 | Peter J. Smith
Posted on 04/18/2007 4:41:56 PM PDT by wagglebee
INDIANAPOLIS, Indiana, April 18, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Several
homosexual "churches" in the Indianapolis area have begun a month-long
advertising campaign of misinformation to distort the clear biblical
prohibitions against homosexual behavior of Christian tradition.
The Jesus Metropolitan Community Church of Indianapolis, Faith In
America and Metropolitan Community Churches started the campaign this
week, placing five different billboards around the Indianapolis area
distorting the biblical foundation of Christianity's clear
prohibitions against sodomy.
The "Would Jesus Discriminate?" Campaign, funded nationally by Faith
in America, Inc., features such signs as "Jesus Affirmed a Gay
Couple": Matt. 8:5-13; "The Early Church Welcomed a Gay Man": Acts
8:26-40; "Jesus Said Some are Born Gay": Matt. 19:10-12; "Ruth Loved
Naomi as Adam Loved Eve", Gen. 2:24, Ruth 1:14; and "David Loved
Jonathan More than Women" II Sam 1:26.
The campaign perverts these Bible passages - known for thousands of
years in Christian and Jewish tradition to have nothing to do with
homosexuality - by reinterpreting them with meanings and connotations
that would have been alien to their scriptural authors and Jews and
Christians of the time.
Far from making exceptions for "loving gay relationships", Mosaic Law,
believed by Jews and Christians to have been given to Moses by God
Himself, severely condemns homosexual acts or sodomy in Leviticus 18
and carried the death penalty. The very name "sodomy" derived its name
from the Biblical city, Sodom, which God told Abraham he would destroy
for its unnatural crimes. Leviticus 18 is devoted to prohibitions
against adultery, incestuous relationships, and in fact, the
prohibition against homosexual behavior falls between verses
prohibiting bestiality and infant sacrifice.
Leviticus 18:22: "You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is
an abomination."
Leviticus 18:29-30: "For whoever shall do any of these abominations,
the persons that do them shall be cut off from among their people. So
keep my charge never to practice any of these abominable customs which
were practiced before you, and never to defile yourselves by them: I
am the LORD your God."
Both the immediate context of the Levitical passage and approximately
3500 years of Jewish and Christian tradition strongly refute the
contortions of "Would Jesus Discriminate?" campaign.
Early Christian teaching vigorously reaffirms Levitical proscriptions
against homosexual behavior in New Testament scripture (Rom. 1:21-29,
1 Cor. 6:9, Jude 1:7, 1 Tim 1:10). Contemporary extra-biblical
Christian writings, such as the Didache, also confirm the
understanding of the early Church that homosexual acts are
intrinsically disordered and destructive.
In an earlier interview with LifeSiteNews.com, orthodox Rabbi Yehuda
Levin explained that Jewish celebrations of Hannukah go back to a
struggle by Jews to defeat the pagan forces corrupting Jewish
society.
"The main celebration of Hanukkah was the defeat of the pagan forces
within Judaism, those who were attempting to paganize Judaism by aping
the Greek culture, and endorse all kinds of pagan rituals and pagan
ideologies including the practice of homosexuality," said Rabbi Levin.
.
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
22 Apr 2007 07:24:22 PM |
|
|
In News 1177286969.633522.42690@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,, bob&carole at
bobandcarole666@hotmail.com, typed this:
On Apr 22, 8:05?pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1177286606.133916.14...@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com,,
bob&carole at bobandcarole...@hotmail.com, typed this:
On Apr 22, 7:51?pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1177285711.819051.263...@b58g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,,
bob&carole at bobandcarole...@hotmail.com, typed this:
On Apr 22, 7:39?pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News numdnV7qdtE3SbbbnZ2dnUVZ_hKdn...@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Ken...@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1177163240.435019.167...@b58g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,,
bob&carole at bobandcarole...@hotmail.com, typed this:
I'll Begone, I'm a k00ky little queer...
Yes, you are.
Why do you do that...
To ***** him off,
Well it aint workin, *****
LOL! I can tell by your reaction that it works quite well.
You don't have the cranial capacity
to ***** me off.
Suureee. LOL! We can see you getting more ***** with every post.
he seems to like it. ?Besides, nothing he has ever said has
warranted a serious response.
AS if YOU had a serious response to give....
Not for assholes like you, certainly.
Translation: "I'm scared of Bob"
LOL! There's nothing about bob and his packmule carlos that would
scare anyone.
You always run from the truth,
LOL! You wouldn't know the truth if it came up and slapped you upside your
fat face.
? Sometimes I get him on the leash and write a
quick script to auto answer his posts. He once argued with my bot
for eight days. Now you have to admit, that's comedy!
Lying suits you...LOL
Denial isn't just a river in Egypt, is it?
C'mon! Jump! Sit up and beg! That's a good dog...
LOL
Yep! That's a good dog bob! Keep fetching for me! Here, get the
stick boy! Hahahahahahaha!
LOL..
Now speak for me!! That it! Good dog, bob.
.
|
|
|
| User: "bobandcarole" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
22 Apr 2007 07:39:27 PM |
|
|
On Apr 22, 8:24=EF=BF=BDpm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1177286969.633522.42...@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,, bob&carole=
at
bobandcarole...@hotmail.com, typed this:
You always run from the truth,
LOL! =A0You wouldn't know the truth if it came up and slapped you upside =
your
fat face.
I know you've been running from me for 6 months
but the truth always catches up with you.
Now speak for me!! =A0That it! =A0Good dog, bob.
Is that the best you can do, *****?
No wonder you post edit....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
22 Apr 2007 07:51:34 PM |
|
|
In News 1177288767.401621.101440@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,, bobandcarole
at bobandcarole777@hotmail.com, typed this:
I know I've been running from you for 6 months
but the truth always catches up with me.
Exactly, good dog, bob!
.
|
|
|
| User: "bobandcarole" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
22 Apr 2007 08:21:36 PM |
|
|
On Apr 22, 8:51?pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1177288767.401621.101...@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,, bobandcarole
at bobandcarole...@hotmail.com, typed this:
I know I've been running from you for 6 months
but the truth always catches up with me.
Exactly, good dog, bob!
I knew you would ***** out again, ARealPUSS
You don't have the nads to face me.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
22 Apr 2007 08:27:40 PM |
|
|
In News 1177291296.916687.128900@b58g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,, bobandcarole
at bobandcarole777@hotmail.com, typed this:
On Apr 22, 8:51?pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
In News 1177288767.401621.101...@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,,
bobandcarole at bobandcarole...@hotmail.com, typed this:
I know I've been running from you for 6 months
but the truth always catches up with me.
Exactly, good dog, bob!
I knew
Bark for my bob! Hell, if this keeps up I'll toss you a milk bone!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "bob&carole" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
21 Apr 2007 08:54:29 AM |
|
|
On Apr 21, 9:50?am, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
Bob is always right.
Yes, I am
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
21 Apr 2007 09:24:05 AM |
|
|
In News 1177163669.585614.313850@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com,, bob&carole
at bobandcarole222@hotmail.com, typed this:
Bob is always an idiot
Yes, I am
Well, at least you admit it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
20 Apr 2007 11:03:08 PM |
|
|
Roy Jose Lorr <Kenthz@comcast.net> writes:
Andrealphus wrote:
WND LAW OF THE LAND
Court rules atheism a religion
Decides 1st Amendment protects prison inmate's right to
start study group
Posted: August 20, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
A. World nutter daily isn't a valid source for anything but
religious tripe, it's little wonder that you would try to use it.
Whatever you think of WND its the law.
Anyone who thinks the WND is the law of the land is deluded.
(I'm replying to what he actually said, of course. :-))
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying BiblicalProhibitions Against Sodomy |
21 Apr 2007 01:30:21 AM |
|
|
Roy Jose Lorr <Kenthz@comcast.net> wrote:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News nrqdnefba6KSRbXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News vd-dna_LmvMlp7XbnZ2dnUVZ_tmknZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News GYKdnVK7PKABrrXbnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News ycidnYmYA-8Ds7XbnZ2dnUVZ_qOpnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News mYidnVFaJZKluLXbnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News E_ednT9NWo0WvLXbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy
Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
DanielSan wrote:
Sound of Trumpet wrote:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1819661/posts
Pro-homosexual Churches Begin Campaign of Misinformation
on Biblical Prohibitions against Sodomy
Since our country is not based on Christian principles,
this is really irrelevant.
The U.S. was founded on Biblical principles.
Nonsense.
So you pray.
Do I know. The founding fathers knew it too. The U.S. is not
now, nor will it ever be, a Christian theocratic state.
You will be pleased to know, the U.S. is well on its way to
becoming a Secular theocratic state.
There is no such thing as a Secular theocratic state. The terms
are dyametrically opposed. You are either secular, or
theocratic, but never both. Our "state", our government is
and well should be secular. You theocrats had your shot at
running things once. They call it "The Dark Ages".
Secularism is a religion.
Not by any legal definition, IRS Code, or Supreme Court ruling.
I see you haven't read your Humanist Manifesto:
Not required. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful legal
definition.
I see, you decide what is meaningful and not. LOL
No, the law does. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful legal
definition.
See if you can get this out of your craw:
WND LAW OF THE LAND
Court rules atheism a religion
You must be a truly stupid ***** to think that "secular" is the same
as "athiest".
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Jose Lorr" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying BiblicalProhibitions Against Sodomy |
22 Apr 2007 04:38:23 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
Roy Jose Lorr <Kenthz@comcast.net> wrote:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News nrqdnefba6KSRbXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News vd-dna_LmvMlp7XbnZ2dnUVZ_tmknZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News GYKdnVK7PKABrrXbnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News ycidnYmYA-8Ds7XbnZ2dnUVZ_qOpnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News mYidnVFaJZKluLXbnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News E_ednT9NWo0WvLXbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy
Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
DanielSan wrote:
Sound of Trumpet wrote:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1819661/posts
Pro-homosexual Churches Begin Campaign of Misinformation
on Biblical Prohibitions against Sodomy
Since our country is not based on Christian principles,
this is really irrelevant.
The U.S. was founded on Biblical principles.
Nonsense.
So you pray.
Do I know. The founding fathers knew it too. The U.S. is not
now, nor will it ever be, a Christian theocratic state.
You will be pleased to know, the U.S. is well on its way to
becoming a Secular theocratic state.
There is no such thing as a Secular theocratic state. The terms
are dyametrically opposed. You are either secular, or
theocratic, but never both. Our "state", our government is
and well should be secular. You theocrats had your shot at
running things once. They call it "The Dark Ages".
Secularism is a religion.
Not by any legal definition, IRS Code, or Supreme Court ruling.
I see you haven't read your Humanist Manifesto:
Not required. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful legal
definition.
I see, you decide what is meaningful and not. LOL
No, the law does. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful legal
definition.
See if you can get this out of your craw:
WND LAW OF THE LAND
Court rules atheism a religion
You must be a truly stupid ***** to think that "secular" is the same
as "athiest".
*****?... possibly. Stupid?... hardly.
Atheist and Secular are joined at the hip. They are
interdependent, two heads on the same beast.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
22 Apr 2007 06:39:50 PM |
|
|
In News WpednTkbfJMUSLbbnZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Roy Jose Lorr <Kenthz@comcast.net> wrote:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News nrqdnefba6KSRbXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News vd-dna_LmvMlp7XbnZ2dnUVZ_tmknZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News GYKdnVK7PKABrrXbnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News ycidnYmYA-8Ds7XbnZ2dnUVZ_qOpnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy
Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News mYidnVFaJZKluLXbnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy
Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News E_ednT9NWo0WvLXbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@comcast.com,,
Roy Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
DanielSan wrote:
Sound of Trumpet wrote:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1819661/posts
Pro-homosexual Churches Begin Campaign of
Misinformation on Biblical Prohibitions against Sodomy
Since our country is not based on Christian principles,
this is really irrelevant.
The U.S. was founded on Biblical principles.
Nonsense.
So you pray.
Do I know. The founding fathers knew it too. The U.S. is
not now, nor will it ever be, a Christian theocratic state.
You will be pleased to know, the U.S. is well on its way to
becoming a Secular theocratic state.
There is no such thing as a Secular theocratic state. The
terms are dyametrically opposed. You are either secular, or
theocratic, but never both. Our "state", our government is
and well should be secular. You theocrats had your shot at
running things once. They call it "The Dark Ages".
Secularism is a religion.
Not by any legal definition, IRS Code, or Supreme Court ruling.
I see you haven't read your Humanist Manifesto:
Not required. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful
legal definition.
I see, you decide what is meaningful and not. LOL
No, the law does. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful
legal definition.
See if you can get this out of your craw:
WND LAW OF THE LAND
Court rules atheism a religion
You must be a truly stupid ***** to think that "secular" is the
same as "athiest".
*****?... possibly. Stupid?... hardly.
Atheist and Secular are joined at the hip.
Nope, two entirely different conditions. That makes you and *****, and
Stupid.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Jose Lorr" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying BiblicalProhibitions Against Sodomy |
22 Apr 2007 09:05:58 PM |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
In News WpednTkbfJMUSLbbnZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Roy Jose Lorr <Kenthz@comcast.net> wrote:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News nrqdnefba6KSRbXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News vd-dna_LmvMlp7XbnZ2dnUVZ_tmknZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News GYKdnVK7PKABrrXbnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News ycidnYmYA-8Ds7XbnZ2dnUVZ_qOpnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy
Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News mYidnVFaJZKluLXbnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy
Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News E_ednT9NWo0WvLXbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@comcast.com,,
Roy Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
DanielSan wrote:
Sound of Trumpet wrote:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1819661/posts
Pro-homosexual Churches Begin Campaign of
Misinformation on Biblical Prohibitions against Sodomy
Since our country is not based on Christian principles,
this is really irrelevant.
The U.S. was founded on Biblical principles.
Nonsense.
So you pray.
Do I know. The founding fathers knew it too. The U.S. is
not now, nor will it ever be, a Christian theocratic state.
You will be pleased to know, the U.S. is well on its way to
becoming a Secular theocratic state.
There is no such thing as a Secular theocratic state. The
terms are dyametrically opposed. You are either secular, or
theocratic, but never both. Our "state", our government is
and well should be secular. You theocrats had your shot at
running things once. They call it "The Dark Ages".
Secularism is a religion.
Not by any legal definition, IRS Code, or Supreme Court ruling.
I see you haven't read your Humanist Manifesto:
Not required. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful
legal definition.
I see, you decide what is meaningful and not. LOL
No, the law does. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful
legal definition.
See if you can get this out of your craw:
WND LAW OF THE LAND
Court rules atheism a religion
You must be a truly stupid ***** to think that "secular" is the
same as "athiest".
*****?... possibly. Stupid?... hardly.
Atheist and Secular are joined at the hip.
Nope, two entirely different conditions. That makes you and *****, and
Stupid.
Which makes you envious.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
22 Apr 2007 09:24:41 PM |
|
|
In News BvqdnVDrSNbcibHbnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News WpednTkbfJMUSLbbnZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Roy Jose Lorr <Kenthz@comcast.net> wrote:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News nrqdnefba6KSRbXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News vd-dna_LmvMlp7XbnZ2dnUVZ_tmknZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News GYKdnVK7PKABrrXbnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy
Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News ycidnYmYA-8Ds7XbnZ2dnUVZ_qOpnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy
Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News mYidnVFaJZKluLXbnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@comcast.com,,
Roy Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News E_ednT9NWo0WvLXbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@comcast.com,,
Roy Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
DanielSan wrote:
Sound of Trumpet wrote:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1819661/posts
Pro-homosexual Churches Begin Campaign of
Misinformation on Biblical Prohibitions against
Sodomy
Since our country is not based on Christian
principles, this is really irrelevant.
The U.S. was founded on Biblical principles.
Nonsense.
So you pray.
Do I know. The founding fathers knew it too. The U.S.
is not now, nor will it ever be, a Christian theocratic
state.
You will be pleased to know, the U.S. is well on its way
to becoming a Secular theocratic state.
There is no such thing as a Secular theocratic state. The
terms are dyametrically opposed. You are either secular,
or theocratic, but never both. Our "state", our
government is and well should be secular. You theocrats
had your shot at running things once. They call it "The
Dark Ages".
Secularism is a religion.
Not by any legal definition, IRS Code, or Supreme Court
ruling.
I see you haven't read your Humanist Manifesto:
Not required. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful
legal definition.
I see, you decide what is meaningful and not. LOL
No, the law does. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful
legal definition.
See if you can get this out of your craw:
WND LAW OF THE LAND
Court rules atheism a religion
You must be a truly stupid ***** to think that "secular" is the
same as "athiest".
*****?... possibly. Stupid?... hardly.
Atheist and Secular are joined at the hip.
Nope, two entirely different conditions. That makes you and
*****, and Stupid.
Which makes you envious.
LOL! So you pray.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Jose Lorr" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying BiblicalProhibitions Against Sodomy |
23 Apr 2007 01:24:00 AM |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
In News BvqdnVDrSNbcibHbnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News WpednTkbfJMUSLbbnZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Roy Jose Lorr <Kenthz@comcast.net> wrote:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News nrqdnefba6KSRbXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News vd-dna_LmvMlp7XbnZ2dnUVZ_tmknZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News GYKdnVK7PKABrrXbnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy
Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News ycidnYmYA-8Ds7XbnZ2dnUVZ_qOpnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy
Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News mYidnVFaJZKluLXbnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@comcast.com,,
Roy Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News E_ednT9NWo0WvLXbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@comcast.com,,
Roy Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
DanielSan wrote:
Sound of Trumpet wrote:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1819661/posts
Pro-homosexual Churches Begin Campaign of
Misinformation on Biblical Prohibitions against
Sodomy
Since our country is not based on Christian
principles, this is really irrelevant.
The U.S. was founded on Biblical principles.
Nonsense.
So you pray.
Do I know. The founding fathers knew it too. The U.S.
is not now, nor will it ever be, a Christian theocratic
state.
You will be pleased to know, the U.S. is well on its way
to becoming a Secular theocratic state.
There is no such thing as a Secular theocratic state. The
terms are dyametrically opposed. You are either secular,
or theocratic, but never both. Our "state", our
government is and well should be secular. You theocrats
had your shot at running things once. They call it "The
Dark Ages".
Secularism is a religion.
Not by any legal definition, IRS Code, or Supreme Court
ruling.
I see you haven't read your Humanist Manifesto:
Not required. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful
legal definition.
I see, you decide what is meaningful and not. LOL
No, the law does. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful
legal definition.
See if you can get this out of your craw:
WND LAW OF THE LAND
Court rules atheism a religion
You must be a truly stupid ***** to think that "secular" is the
same as "athiest".
*****?... possibly. Stupid?... hardly.
Atheist and Secular are joined at the hip.
Nope, two entirely different conditions. That makes you and
*****, and Stupid.
Which makes you envious.
LOL! So you pray.
Mimicry suits you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
23 Apr 2007 06:16:30 AM |
|
|
In News _bOdnRU-HpFAzbHbnZ2dnUVZ_h3inZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News BvqdnVDrSNbcibHbnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News WpednTkbfJMUSLbbnZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Roy Jose Lorr <Kenthz@comcast.net> wrote:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News nrqdnefba6KSRbXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News vd-dna_LmvMlp7XbnZ2dnUVZ_tmknZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy
Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News GYKdnVK7PKABrrXbnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy
Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News ycidnYmYA-8Ds7XbnZ2dnUVZ_qOpnZ2d@comcast.com,,
Roy Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News mYidnVFaJZKluLXbnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@comcast.com,,
Roy Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News
E_ednT9NWo0WvLXbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy
Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
DanielSan wrote:
Sound of Trumpet wrote:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1819661/posts
Pro-homosexual Churches Begin Campaign of
Misinformation on Biblical Prohibitions against
Sodomy
Since our country is not based on Christian
principles, this is really irrelevant.
The U.S. was founded on Biblical principles.
Nonsense.
So you pray.
Do I know. The founding fathers knew it too. The U.S.
is not now, nor will it ever be, a Christian theocratic
state.
You will be pleased to know, the U.S. is well on its way
to becoming a Secular theocratic state.
There is no such thing as a Secular theocratic state. The
terms are dyametrically opposed. You are either
secular, or theocratic, but never both. Our "state",
our government is and well should be secular. You
theocrats had your shot at running things once. They
call it "The Dark Ages".
Secularism is a religion.
Not by any legal definition, IRS Code, or Supreme Court
ruling.
I see you haven't read your Humanist Manifesto:
Not required. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful
legal definition.
I see, you decide what is meaningful and not. LOL
No, the law does. Secularism is not a religion by any
meaningful legal definition.
See if you can get this out of your craw:
WND LAW OF THE LAND
Court rules atheism a religion
You must be a truly stupid ***** to think that "secular" is the
same as "athiest".
*****?... possibly. Stupid?... hardly.
Atheist and Secular are joined at the hip.
Nope, two entirely different conditions. That makes you and
*****, and Stupid.
Which makes you envious.
LOL! So you pray.
Mimicry suits you.
Stupidity is your creed.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying BiblicalProhibitions Against Sodomy |
22 Apr 2007 07:27:00 PM |
|
|
Roy Jose Lorr <Kenthz@comcast.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Roy Jose Lorr <Kenthz@comcast.net> wrote:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News nrqdnefba6KSRbXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News vd-dna_LmvMlp7XbnZ2dnUVZ_tmknZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News GYKdnVK7PKABrrXbnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News ycidnYmYA-8Ds7XbnZ2dnUVZ_qOpnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News mYidnVFaJZKluLXbnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News E_ednT9NWo0WvLXbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy
Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
DanielSan wrote:
Sound of Trumpet wrote:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1819661/posts
Pro-homosexual Churches Begin Campaign of Misinformation
on Biblical Prohibitions against Sodomy
Since our country is not based on Christian principles,
this is really irrelevant.
The U.S. was founded on Biblical principles.
Nonsense.
So you pray.
Do I know. The founding fathers knew it too. The U.S. is not
now, nor will it ever be, a Christian theocratic state.
You will be pleased to know, the U.S. is well on its way to
becoming a Secular theocratic state.
There is no such thing as a Secular theocratic state. The terms
are dyametrically opposed. You are either secular, or
theocratic, but never both. Our "state", our government is
and well should be secular. You theocrats had your shot at
running things once. They call it "The Dark Ages".
Secularism is a religion.
Not by any legal definition, IRS Code, or Supreme Court ruling.
I see you haven't read your Humanist Manifesto:
Not required. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful legal
definition.
I see, you decide what is meaningful and not. LOL
No, the law does. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful legal
definition.
See if you can get this out of your craw:
WND LAW OF THE LAND
Court rules atheism a religion
You must be a truly stupid ***** to think that "secular" is the same
as "athiest".
*****?... possibly. Stupid?... hardly.
Outright liar? Quite likely.
Atheist and Secular are joined at the hip.
Fascism and religion are two facets of the same mentality.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Jose Lorr" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying BiblicalProhibitions Against Sodomy |
22 Apr 2007 09:26:45 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
Roy Jose Lorr <Kenthz@comcast.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Roy Jose Lorr <Kenthz@comcast.net> wrote:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News nrqdnefba6KSRbXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News vd-dna_LmvMlp7XbnZ2dnUVZ_tmknZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News GYKdnVK7PKABrrXbnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News ycidnYmYA-8Ds7XbnZ2dnUVZ_qOpnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News mYidnVFaJZKluLXbnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News E_ednT9NWo0WvLXbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy
Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
DanielSan wrote:
Sound of Trumpet wrote:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1819661/posts
Pro-homosexual Churches Begin Campaign of Misinformation
on Biblical Prohibitions against Sodomy
Since our country is not based on Christian principles,
this is really irrelevant.
The U.S. was founded on Biblical principles.
Nonsense.
So you pray.
Do I know. The founding fathers knew it too. The U.S. is not
now, nor will it ever be, a Christian theocratic state.
You will be pleased to know, the U.S. is well on its way to
becoming a Secular theocratic state.
There is no such thing as a Secular theocratic state. The terms
are dyametrically opposed. You are either secular, or
theocratic, but never both. Our "state", our government is
and well should be secular. You theocrats had your shot at
running things once. They call it "The Dark Ages".
Secularism is a religion.
Not by any legal definition, IRS Code, or Supreme Court ruling.
I see you haven't read your Humanist Manifesto:
Not required. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful legal
definition.
I see, you decide what is meaningful and not. LOL
No, the law does. Secularism is not a religion by any meaningful legal
definition.
See if you can get this out of your craw:
WND LAW OF THE LAND
Court rules atheism a religion
You must be a truly stupid ***** to think that "secular" is the same
as "athiest".
*****?... possibly. Stupid?... hardly.
Outright liar? Quite likely.
Atheist and Secular are joined at the hip.
Fascism and religion are two facets of the same mentality.
Well, you're apparently the expert on fascism.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying BiblicalProhibitions Against Sodomy |
22 Apr 2007 09:46:53 PM |
|
|
Roy Jose Lorr <Kenthz@comcast.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Roy Jose Lorr <Kenthz@comcast.net> wrote:
Atheist and Secular are joined at the hip.
Fascism and religion are two facets of the same mentality.
Well, you're apparently the expert on fascism.
Like you're the expert on atheism?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
19 Apr 2007 10:31:17 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:30:07 -0700, in alt.atheism
Roy Jose Lorr <Kenthz@comcast.net> wrote in
<GYKdnVK7PKABrrXbnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@comcast.com>:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News ycidnYmYA-8Ds7XbnZ2dnUVZ_qOpnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
....
You will be pleased to know, the U.S. is well on its way to
becoming a Secular theocratic state.
There is no such thing as a Secular theocratic state. The terms are
dyametrically opposed. You are either secular, or theocratic, but never
both. Our "state", our government is and well should be secular. You
theocrats had your shot at running things once. They call it "The Dark
Ages".
Secularism is a religion.
You have repeatedly asserted that.
You have never managed to provide a shred of evidence to support your
assertion.
Why do you continue to lie?
--
"... There's glory for you."
"I don't know what you mean by 'glory,'" Alice said.
Humpty Dumpty smiles contemptuously. "Of course you don't--till
I tell you. I meant 'there's a nice knock-down argument for you!'"
"But glory doesn't mean "a nice knock-down argument," Alice objected.
"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful tone,
"it means just what I choose it to mean--neither more nor less."
"The question is," said Alice "whether you can make words mean so
many different things."
"The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master--that's
all."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Jose Lorr" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying BiblicalProhibitions Against Sodomy |
19 Apr 2007 10:54:56 PM |
|
|
Free Lunch wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:30:07 -0700, in alt.atheism
Roy Jose Lorr <Kenthz@comcast.net> wrote in
<GYKdnVK7PKABrrXbnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@comcast.com>:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News ycidnYmYA-8Ds7XbnZ2dnUVZ_qOpnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
...
You will be pleased to know, the U.S. is well on its way to
becoming a Secular theocratic state.
There is no such thing as a Secular theocratic state. The terms are
dyametrically opposed. You are either secular, or theocratic, but never
both. Our "state", our government is and well should be secular. You
theocrats had your shot at running things once. They call it "The Dark
Ages".
Secularism is a religion.
You have repeatedly asserted that.
You have never managed to provide a shred of evidence to support your
assertion.
If it looks, quacks, swims and waddles like a duck its for
sure not an elephant.
Why do you continue to lie?
Why do you continue to deny?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
19 Apr 2007 10:56:22 PM |
|
|
In News 8_idnbeV5P3wpLXbnZ2dnUVZ_rjinZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Free Lunch wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:30:07 -0700, in alt.atheism
Roy Jose Lorr <Kenthz@comcast.net> wrote in
<GYKdnVK7PKABrrXbnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@comcast.com>:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News ycidnYmYA-8Ds7XbnZ2dnUVZ_qOpnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
...
You will be pleased to know, the U.S. is well on its way to
becoming a Secular theocratic state.
There is no such thing as a Secular theocratic state. The terms
are dyametrically opposed. You are either secular, or theocratic,
but never both. Our "state", our government is and well should
be secular. You theocrats had your shot at running things once. They
call it "The Dark Ages".
Secularism is a religion.
You have repeatedly asserted that.
You have never managed to provide a shred of evidence to support your
assertion.
If it looks, quacks, swims and waddles like a duck its for
sure not an elephant.
And secularism is not a religion by any meaningful definition.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Jose Lorr" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying BiblicalProhibitions Against Sodomy |
19 Apr 2007 11:41:31 PM |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 8_idnbeV5P3wpLXbnZ2dnUVZ_rjinZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Free Lunch wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:30:07 -0700, in alt.atheism
Roy Jose Lorr <Kenthz@comcast.net> wrote in
<GYKdnVK7PKABrrXbnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@comcast.com>:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News ycidnYmYA-8Ds7XbnZ2dnUVZ_qOpnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
...
You will be pleased to know, the U.S. is well on its way to
becoming a Secular theocratic state.
There is no such thing as a Secular theocratic state. The terms
are dyametrically opposed. You are either secular, or theocratic,
but never both. Our "state", our government is and well should
be secular. You theocrats had your shot at running things once. They
call it "The Dark Ages".
Secularism is a religion.
You have repeatedly asserted that.
You have never managed to provide a shred of evidence to support your
assertion.
If it looks, quacks, swims and waddles like a duck its for
sure not an elephant.
And secularism is not a religion by any meaningful definition.
Secularism meets all the requirements needed to define it as
a religion.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
20 Apr 2007 06:14:07 AM |
|
|
In News AsWdnQrqvN7F2bXbnZ2dnUVZ_vrinZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 8_idnbeV5P3wpLXbnZ2dnUVZ_rjinZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Free Lunch wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:30:07 -0700, in alt.atheism
Roy Jose Lorr <Kenthz@comcast.net> wrote in
<GYKdnVK7PKABrrXbnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@comcast.com>:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News ycidnYmYA-8Ds7XbnZ2dnUVZ_qOpnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
...
You will be pleased to know, the U.S. is well on its way to
becoming a Secular theocratic state.
There is no such thing as a Secular theocratic state. The terms
are dyametrically opposed. You are either secular, or
theocratic, but never both. Our "state", our government is
and well should be secular. You theocrats had your shot at running
things
once. They call it "The Dark Ages".
Secularism is a religion.
You have repeatedly asserted that.
You have never managed to provide a shred of evidence to support
your assertion.
If it looks, quacks, swims and waddles like a duck its for
sure not an elephant.
And secularism is not a religion by any meaningful definition.
Secularism meets all the requirements needed to define it as
a religion.
Not by any meaningful legal definition.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Jose Lorr" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying BiblicalProhibitions Against Sodomy |
20 Apr 2007 10:10:11 AM |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
In News AsWdnQrqvN7F2bXbnZ2dnUVZ_vrinZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 8_idnbeV5P3wpLXbnZ2dnUVZ_rjinZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Free Lunch wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:30:07 -0700, in alt.atheism
Roy Jose Lorr <Kenthz@comcast.net> wrote in
<GYKdnVK7PKABrrXbnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@comcast.com>:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News ycidnYmYA-8Ds7XbnZ2dnUVZ_qOpnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
...
You will be pleased to know, the U.S. is well on its way to
becoming a Secular theocratic state.
There is no such thing as a Secular theocratic state. The terms
are dyametrically opposed. You are either secular, or
theocratic, but never both. Our "state", our government is
and well should be secular. You theocrats had your shot at running
things
once. They call it "The Dark Ages".
Secularism is a religion.
You have repeatedly asserted that.
You have never managed to provide a shred of evidence to support
your assertion.
If it looks, quacks, swims and waddles like a duck its for
sure not an elephant.
And secularism is not a religion by any meaningful definition.
Secularism meets all the requirements needed to define it as
a religion.
Not by any meaningful legal definition.
LOL
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
20 Apr 2007 08:14:50 PM |
|
|
In News nrqdneTba6JOSrXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News AsWdnQrqvN7F2bXbnZ2dnUVZ_vrinZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 8_idnbeV5P3wpLXbnZ2dnUVZ_rjinZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Free Lunch wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:30:07 -0700, in alt.atheism
Roy Jose Lorr <Kenthz@comcast.net> wrote in
<GYKdnVK7PKABrrXbnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@comcast.com>:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News ycidnYmYA-8Ds7XbnZ2dnUVZ_qOpnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
...
You will be pleased to know, the U.S. is well on its way to
becoming a Secular theocratic state.
There is no such thing as a Secular theocratic state. The
terms are dyametrically opposed. You are either secular, or
theocratic, but never both. Our "state", our government is
and well should be secular. You theocrats had your shot at
running things
once. They call it "The Dark Ages".
Secularism is a religion.
You have repeatedly asserted that.
You have never managed to provide a shred of evidence to support
your assertion.
If it looks, quacks, swims and waddles like a duck its for
sure not an elephant.
And secularism is not a religion by any meaningful definition.
Secularism meets all the requirements needed to define it as
a religion.
Not by any meaningful legal definition.
LOL
Laugh all you want, but it's true. You won't find secularism defined as a
religion in any ruling or law. Nothing in the IRS Tax Codes, nothing in the
Constitution, nothing in relevant law, and nothing in case law. Secularism
is not a religion by any meaningful legal definition.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Jose Lorr" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying BiblicalProhibitions Against Sodomy |
20 Apr 2007 09:56:06 PM |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
In News nrqdneTba6JOSrXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News AsWdnQrqvN7F2bXbnZ2dnUVZ_vrinZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 8_idnbeV5P3wpLXbnZ2dnUVZ_rjinZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Free Lunch wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:30:07 -0700, in alt.atheism
Roy Jose Lorr <Kenthz@comcast.net> wrote in
<GYKdnVK7PKABrrXbnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@comcast.com>:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News ycidnYmYA-8Ds7XbnZ2dnUVZ_qOpnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
...
You will be pleased to know, the U.S. is well on its way to
becoming a Secular theocratic state.
There is no such thing as a Secular theocratic state. The
terms are dyametrically opposed. You are either secular, or
theocratic, but never both. Our "state", our government is
and well should be secular. You theocrats had your shot at
running things
once. They call it "The Dark Ages".
Secularism is a religion.
You have repeatedly asserted that.
You have never managed to provide a shred of evidence to support
your assertion.
If it looks, quacks, swims and waddles like a duck its for
sure not an elephant.
And secularism is not a religion by any meaningful definition.
Secularism meets all the requirements needed to define it as
a religion.
Not by any meaningful legal definition.
LOL
Laugh all you want, but it's true. You won't find secularism defined as a
religion in any ruling or law. Nothing in the IRS Tax Codes, nothing in the
Constitution, nothing in relevant law, and nothing in case law. Secularism
is not a religion by any meaningful legal definition.
_____________________________________________________________
WND LAW OF THE LAND
Court rules atheism a religion
Decides 1st Amendment protects prison inmate's right to
start study group
Posted: August 20, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45874
A federal court of appeals ruled yesterday Wisconsin prison
officials violated an inmate's rights because they did not
treat atheism as a religion.
______________________________________________________________
Secularism is merely one of Atheism's religious tentacles
invading the public sector. In the cause of promoting
Secularism the ACLU and other organizations who are
allegedly supposed to protect our civil liberties have been
attacking monuments that contain the 10 commandments all
over the United States. They falsely claim that these
monuments are in violation of the first amendment... whereby
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”
Promoting secularism is no different than promoting any
other religion. Religion is a belief system that moves its
members to action or to support a cause with fervent
devotion. Atheism/Secularism is not the absence of a
belief system but the fervent belief that there is no God or
higher power and that other belief systems should be
rejected or ignored. To the atheist/Secularist the highest
power, the sole authority due worship by humankind is the
individual.
The government is forcing people into an Atheist/Secularist
belief system. Though Atheism/Secularism is just as much
of a religion in the legal sense as Catholicism, Hinduism,
Buddhism, Protestantism, and Judaism, today's government is
actively forcing people to abandon those religions in favor
of an Atheist/Secularist belief system. By repressing those
traditional belief systems in favor of one more suitable to
the powers that be, Congress and/or the courts has made law
that encourages government establishment of religion,
violating the rights of followers of other religions to
practice their beliefs without prohibition.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying Biblical Prohibitions Against Sodomy |
20 Apr 2007 10:00:14 PM |
|
|
In News McadnW3xlf3q4LTbnZ2dnUVZ_tWhnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News nrqdneTba6JOSrXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News AsWdnQrqvN7F2bXbnZ2dnUVZ_vrinZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 8_idnbeV5P3wpLXbnZ2dnUVZ_rjinZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Free Lunch wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:30:07 -0700, in alt.atheism
Roy Jose Lorr <Kenthz@comcast.net> wrote in
<GYKdnVK7PKABrrXbnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@comcast.com>:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News ycidnYmYA-8Ds7XbnZ2dnUVZ_qOpnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy
Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
...
You will be pleased to know, the U.S. is well on its way to
becoming a Secular theocratic state.
There is no such thing as a Secular theocratic state. The
terms are dyametrically opposed. You are either secular, or
theocratic, but never both. Our "state", our government is
and well should be secular. You theocrats had your shot at
running things
once. They call it "The Dark Ages".
Secularism is a religion.
You have repeatedly asserted that.
You have never managed to provide a shred of evidence to
support your assertion.
If it looks, quacks, swims and waddles like a duck its for
sure not an elephant.
And secularism is not a religion by any meaningful definition.
Secularism meets all the requirements needed to define it as
a religion.
Not by any meaningful legal definition.
LOL
Laugh all you want, but it's true. You won't find secularism
defined as a religion in any ruling or law. Nothing in the IRS Tax
Codes, nothing in the Constitution, nothing in relevant law, and
nothing in case law. Secularism is not a religion by any
meaningful legal definition.
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
Hahahaha! World nut daily, you might as well be using Charles Manson as a
source. Atheism has never been ruled a religion, nor is Atheism and
Secularism (What we were discussing) the same thing. Try again.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Jose Lorr" |
|
| Title: Re: Liberal Pro-Homosexual Churches Begin Campaign Denying BiblicalProhibitions Against Sodomy |
22 Apr 2007 02:18:13 PM |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
In News McadnW3xlf3q4LTbnZ2dnUVZ_tWhnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr at
Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News nrqdneTba6JOSrXbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose Lorr
at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News AsWdnQrqvN7F2bXbnZ2dnUVZ_vrinZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 8_idnbeV5P3wpLXbnZ2dnUVZ_rjinZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy Jose
Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
Free Lunch wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:30:07 -0700, in alt.atheism
Roy Jose Lorr <Kenthz@comcast.net> wrote in
<GYKdnVK7PKABrrXbnZ2dnUVZ_h_inZ2d@comcast.com>:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News ycidnYmYA-8Ds7XbnZ2dnUVZ_qOpnZ2d@comcast.com,, Roy
Jose Lorr at Kenthz@comcast.net, typed this:
...
You will be pleased to know, the U.S. is well on its way to
becoming a Secular theocratic state.
There is no such thing as a Secular theocratic state. The
terms are dyametrically opposed. You are either secular, or
theocratic, but never both. Our "state", our government is
and well should be secular. You theocrats had your shot at
running things
once. They call it "The Dark Ages".
Secularism is a religion.
You have repeatedly asserted that.
You have never managed to provide a shred of evidence to
support your assertion.
If it looks, quacks, swims and waddles like a duck its for
sure not an elephant.
And secularism is not a religion by any meaningful definition.
Secularism meets all the requirements needed to define it as
a religion.
Not by any meaningful legal definition.
LOL
Laugh all you want, but it's true. You won't find secularism
defined as a religion in any ruling or law. Nothing in the IRS Tax
Codes, nothing in the Constitution, nothing in relevant law, and
nothing in case law. Secularism is not a religion by any
meaningful legal definition.
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
Hahahaha! World nut daily, you might as well be using Charles Manson as a
source. Atheism has never been ruled a religion, nor is Atheism and
Secularism (What we were discussing) the same thing. Try again.
Facts are facts no matter where they come from.
______________________________________________________________
WND LAW OF THE LAND
Court rules atheism a religion
Decides 1st Amendment protects prison inmate's right to
start study group
Posted: August 20, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45874
A federal court of appeals ruled yesterday Wisconsin prison
officials violated an inmate's rights because they did not
treat atheism as a religion.
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
Secularism is merely one of Atheism's religious tentacles
invading the public sector. In the cause of promoting
Secularism the ACLU and other organizations who are
allegedly supposed to protect our civil liberties have been
attacking monuments that contain the 10 commandments all
over the United States. They falsely claim that these
monuments are in violation of the first amendment... whereby
| | | | | | | | | | |
