Five to Midnight

By Israel Shamir

Five to Midnight

By Israel Shamir


To the north of prosperous Hertzliya, the capital of Israeli high-tech
industry with its plentiful sushi-bars, there is a pleasant beach
below a steep, almost Pacific bank. It is an unattended shore, without
lifeguards, and it is frequented by nature-loving foreigners and the
Palestinian families on their outing to the nearby sanctuary of Sidna
(Our Master) Ali. <

If you will walk even further north, beyond the
signs forbidding your advance for the very real danger of avalanche,
you will find yourself in a secluded cove, a rarity on the straight
line of the Palestinian shore. It is a beautiful place for a swim in
transparent waters of the Med. Big earth-coloured boulders guard the
cove; at a second careful look you will understand that they are not a
natural formation. They are bastions of the Crusader castle of Arsur,
whose ruins rise on the plateau well above the beach. The bastions
were overturned and dropped into the blue-green sea by Baibars, a
great Arab commander, the vanquisher of Mongols and Crusaders in 13th
century.<

The Cove of Arsur

Some 150 years earlier, the Crusaders easily conquered the Holy Land,
and easily settled down. They built their castles and farmsteads,
married local Christian Orthodox and Armenian women, and could live
happily ever after. But they used to invite foreign adventurers and
serve as the beachhead for their landings, and proved their inability
to fit in as a good neighbour. They were given many chances, but they

Then, the 'weak and feminine' Levant brought forth Baibars. It is not
enough to expel the Crusaders, he ruled, for it was tried by Saladin;
but the Franks came back. The only way to get rid of them is to
destroy the shore of Palestine so they will never be able to snatch it
again. Castle after castle, settlement after settlement, city after
city, Baibars ruined the seaside of the Holy Land: Caesarea, Askalon,
Jaffa, Arsur. He regretted it, but the alternative was an eternal
warfare in the region.

The Overturned Bastions of Arsur
It seems that history is about to repeat itself. Unless some
unexpected turn of events will occur, the sweet land of Palestine is
doomed to perdition. The German-built, US-equipped nuclear submarines
of the Jewish state poised to wreck havoc in Iran, Syria, Saudi
Arabia, make it abundantly clear ? there is no way Israel will become
a decent neighbour in Levant.<

The Jews were given a good chance to strike root in the land of
Palestine and make peace with the native population. But they blew it.<

The recent unprovoked Israeli air strike into the depth of Syria
reminded to those who had forgotten that the Jewish state is an
aggressive entity dangerous for the region. Thirty years of calm
between Syria and Israel were dismissed by Sharon's generals as of no
consequence. Nobody was fooled by their clumsy attempt to connect
Syria to the bloody act of personal vengeance meted by the young woman
from al-Halil whose brother and fiancé were murdered and father
refused medical help by the Israeli military. Insightful Malaysian
Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad interpreted that well: "Israel has
been urging America to invade Syria, but Americans seemed to be
reluctant, so in order to force the US hand, Israel carried out the
air strike" [i].<

The problem of Israel is not the problem of Palestinian suffering
anymore; it is the problem for the entire region from India to
Ethiopia (Esther, 1) and beyond. Indeed, the fifth column of
Israel-supporters instigates wars all over the world, from Chechnya to
Philippines, from North Korea to Cuba. They push the world straight
into Armageddon. John Bolton calls for takeover of Iran, Murawiec
demands to beat Saudi Arabia. The rabidly Zionist New York Post lifts
its sights to France, "one of America's ugliest enemies" led by
Chirac, "a moral pygmy whose lack of scruples is, fortunately,
balanced by a lack of courage and power." "France should be made to
suffer, strategically and financially. The French stabbed us in the
back. In response, we should skin them alive?, continues the
newspaper, and judging by the Zionist record, it is not just a figure
of speech.>
The Jewish state is an extremely dangerous bundle of goods. It is part
of Israeli military doctrine: act crazy, and people will be scared of
you. The bogus threat of nuclear Iraq was modelled on the real threat
of nuclear Israel. Its scientists practice chemical and biological
warfare, as well. They actually tried nerve gas on demonstrators in
Gaza, and water poisoning at the siege of Acre, as reported Abu Sitta
in Al-Ahram.
Israel is involved in a long line of kidnapping and assassinations
carried out on foreign soil. There is no immunity from the long arm of
Israel: they killed in Norway (the notorious Lillehammer affair), they
kidnapped in Rome (Vanunu affair), they bombed British library and
American consulate (Lavon affair), they sunk USS Liberty, they tried
to assassinate Joseph Mugabe, they probably assassinated the
anti-Zionist US Secretary of State James Forrestol, were involved in
the assassination of President Kennedy, as Michael Collins Piper in
<>The Final Judgment<> makes clear, for the American president
insisted on nuclear disarmament of Israel. Recent assassination of
Anna Lindh, the Swedish Foreign Minister, who supported boycott of
Israel, still remains a mystery.
They are not particularly secretive: today we know who assassinated
Count Bernadotte in 1948, and who committed mass murder of German POW
in 1946, and who murdered the Egyptian POWs in 1956, for their
perpetrators boast about it. Tomorrow we shall know who did other
atrocities. But our knowledge won't help, for Israel is a safe haven
for criminals. Whenever caught red-handed, Israel brushed away the
world public opinion, for as Ben Gurion, our first Prime Minister
said, 'what the goyim say is of no importance, only what the Jews do
is of importance'.
This sad record refreshed by the air strike on Syria and the
preparation for nuclear strike on Iran proves there is no way to make
Israel a suitable member of the community of nations. It also answers
the question whether the peace efforts and attempts to roll Israel
back to its old borders are still relevant. They are not. In borders
of 67', 48' or 73', Israel remains a bridgehead of aggression, a
threat to world peace and a physical threat to world leaders. Like the
bloodthirsty sect of Assassins, who once plagued the region,
Israel-supporters undermine or murder better rulers, and support
weaklings who are prepared to act on their orders. Israel's withdrawal
from the West Bank will not change its nature. The leopard can't
change his spots, as Jeremiah the prophet had said (13:23).

Israel's behaviour is partly connected to the Jewish superiority
complex, and its consequence, the apartheid structure. The South
Africa before Mandela also was involved in destruction of its
neighbours, Mozambique and Namibia, and in many plots elsewhere in
Africa. This superiority complex should be treated by dismantling the
apartheid state. The events of last year proved it beyond reasonable
doubt. Dismantlement by peaceful means of democratisation is the only
viable alternative to Israel's otherwise inevitable ruination. While
bringing the brinkmanship policy to the level of 'calculated madness',
Israeli leaders failed to predict they will bring to life a whole
generation that does not care whether they are dead or alive.

Until recently, fear of Israeli retaliation kept its adversaries at
bay. In 1991, the Iraqi president Saddam Hussein had powerful WMD, but
he did not use it against Israel, for he did not feel desperate. He
believed the threat of Israel to destroy Iraq if he uses WMD. He
thought that he could survive the defeat. He did not understand that
Israeli idea of war is drawn on the Jewish religious tradition that
knows no mercy. If Saddam would know that bodies of his tortured sons
would lie in a Baghdad morgue, that he would be turned into a homeless
refugee, that his country will be ruined by ten years of sanctions and
afterwards become prey to Zionist invader, he might be well tempted to
do the Samson solution, and take the Jewish state with him into nether
regions in 1991.

Saddam Hussein is gone, but by now, every leader in the world knows
what he should expect if Israel asks its American Golem for his head.
Paradoxically, the very cruelty of Israel turned its threat into an
empty sound, for if they will do their worst anyway, it makes no sense
to surrender to their demands.

The Jews of Israel repeated the folly of Napoleon in Jaffa. In 1799,
the young Corsican general crossed the Sinai desert and marched north
into Palestine. Rafah and Ramleh surrendered to his troops, for the
Palestinian soldiers saw no reason to fight the passing European
force. Napoleon proceeded to the port of Jaffa, where six thousand
strong garrison of the city also preferred to surrender. They thought
they will be disarmed and sent home, to their villages, but Napoleon
was reluctant to leave so many enemy soldiers behind his lines and
ordered to kill them all. It took the French three days to kill such
mass of people. They were brought in groups from the Armenian St
Nicolas' Convent to the shore and bayoneted.

After this massacre, all Palestine took to weapons. Napoleon's troops
were ambushed at every orange grove, and when he came to the walls of
Acre, there was no talk of surrender. People understood that it just
makes no sense. They could as well die fighting. After a few months of
fruitless efforts, Napoleon turned back, leaving his wounded soldiers
to be slaughtered by advancing enemy. In the gentrified centre of
Jaffa, there is a squat papier?mache figure of le petit caporal in his
triangular hat reminding the tourists and the locals of backfiring
nature of cruelty, but probably the Israeli leaders did not pay it
sufficient attention when their policies brought the country on the
brink of destruction.

The heavy feeling of looming disaster is one of the unmentioned
reasons behind the 'One State Solution' we proposed and advocated.
True, 'one state' would be good for the Palestinians; it would be good
for Israelis. But a new partition, Two States' solution could also
alleviate the Palestinian suffering, as Prof Neumann and many moderate
peace activists rightly noted. It could be even preferred by the
Israeli and Palestinian elites, though an independent state in the
West Bank and Gaza won't solve the problem of refugees. However, in no
way the partition would alleviate the threat to the world peace poised
by the rogue Jewish state, and it won't prevent the imminent disaster
in the Holy Land.

Even a smaller Jewish state will be the seat of Mossad and its
assassination unit, Kidon. Even a smaller Jewish state will possess
nuclear weapons. Even a smaller Jewish state will be poisoned by its
deeply rooted and extremely xenophobic ideology, and will remain a
source of ideological contamination. Even a smaller Jewish state will
be heavily involved in politics of subversion from Moscow to
Washington, DC. And then, it is just a question of time, when a pushed
too far leader of a state ? be it North Korea, Iran, Egypt, or Russia
- will remember the bodies of Saddam' sons and decide to follow the
path of Baibars and of Mongol sultans who removed the Assassins from
their eagle nests. For without Israel, the US forces would hang around
their bases in Georgia and Texas instead of seeking the Jew-haters in
the five continents. Demise of Israel is inevitable; the only question
whether it will be forcibly removed and the land destroyed, or it will
be peacefully absorbed in the region.

Equality in the Holy Land ? it is not only a moral demand; it is the
only way to save the country of approaching destruction. Not us, not
the do-gooders or peace-lovers, but the inevitable course of events
leads us to the choice: equality or death.

Israeli cruelty, vengefulness and inability to respect others called
hundreds of Palestinians to the horrible martyrdom. If, or rather when
a potential martyr will be equipped with a miniaturised nuclear device
instead of home-made dynamite, the sad story of the Jewish state will
be over.

The Jewish belt of Israel is quite small, and just two well-placed
half-megaton nuclear devices can wipe it off the face of Earth. It is
possible that in its last throes, it will make true its threat
vocalised by Prof van Crefeld of Hebrew University and 'go down by
taking the world along', for Israeli nuclear weapons are trained,
according to van Crefeld, at European capitals, as well as on the
neighbours. But no amount of security measures will be able to stop a
nuclear suicide bomber, and she may disregard the fate of people who
failed to protect her and her family.

And then, some years later, the ruins of Tel Aviv will blend smoothly
with the ruins of Arsur.

(i) www.ndtv.com/template/template.asp?template=Palestine&slug=Malaysian%25

See also: Israeli Subs have Nukes Aimed at Iranian Sites
www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?id=1169

-------------



http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=1158

Last updated 19/10/2003

Israeli nuclear weapons are trained,
according to van Crefeld, at European capitals

Five to Midnight

By Israel Shamir

Five to Midnight

By Israel Shamir


To the north of prosperous Hertzliya, the capital of Israeli high-tech
industry with its plentiful sushi-bars, there is a pleasant beach
below a steep, almost Pacific bank. It is an unattended shore, without
lifeguards, and it is frequented by nature-loving foreigners and the
Palestinian families on their outing to the nearby sanctuary of Sidna
(Our Master) Ali. If you will walk even further north, beyond the
signs forbidding your advance for the very real danger of avalanche,
you will find yourself in a secluded cove, a rarity on the straight
line of the Palestinian shore. It is a beautiful place for a swim in
transparent waters of the Med. Big earth-coloured boulders guard the
cove; at a second careful look you will understand that they are not a
natural formation. They are bastions of the Crusader castle of Arsur,
whose ruins rise on the plateau well above the beach. The bastions
were overturned and dropped into the blue-green sea by Baibars, a
great Arab commander, the vanquisher of Mongols and Crusaders in 13th
century.


The Cove of Arsur

Some 150 years earlier, the Crusaders easily conquered the Holy Land,
and easily settled down. They built their castles and farmsteads,
married local Christian Orthodox and Armenian women, and could live
happily ever after. But they used to invite foreign adventurers and
serve as the beachhead for their landings, and proved their inability
to fit in as a good neighbour. They were given many chances, but they
blew them all and remained a potential ally to any foreign aggressor.

Then, the 'weak and feminine' Levant brought forth Baibars. It is not
enough to expel the Crusaders, he ruled, for it was tried by Saladin;
but the Franks came back. The only way to get rid of them is to
destroy the shore of Palestine so they will never be able to snatch it
again. Castle after castle, settlement after settlement, city after
city, Baibars ruined the seaside of the Holy Land: Caesarea, Askalon,
Jaffa, Arsur. He regretted it, but the alternative was an eternal
warfare in the region.


The Overturned Bastions of Arsur

It seems that history is about to repeat itself. Unless some
unexpected turn of events will occur, the sweet land of Palestine is
doomed to perdition. The German-built, US-equipped nuclear submarines
of the Jewish state poised to wreck havoc in Iran, Syria, Saudi
Arabia, make it abundantly clear ? there is no way Israel will become
a decent neighbour in Levant.

The Jews were given a good chance to strike root in the land of
Palestine and make peace with the native population. But they blew it.
The recent unprovoked Israeli air strike into the depth of Syria
reminded to those who had forgotten that the Jewish state is an
aggressive entity dangerous for the region. Thirty years of calm
between Syria and Israel were dismissed by Sharon's generals as of no
consequence. Nobody was fooled by their clumsy attempt to connect
Syria to the bloody act of personal vengeance meted by the young woman
from al-Halil whose brother and fiancé were murdered and father
refused medical help by the Israeli military. Insightful Malaysian
Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad interpreted that well: "Israel has
been urging America to invade Syria, but Americans seemed to be
reluctant, so in order to force the US hand, Israel carried out the
air strike" [i].

The problem of Israel is not the problem of Palestinian suffering
anymore; it is the problem for the entire region from India to
Ethiopia (Esther, 1) and beyond. Indeed, the fifth column of
Israel-supporters instigates wars all over the world, from Chechnya to
Philippines, from North Korea to Cuba. They push the world straight
into Armageddon. John Bolton calls for takeover of Iran, Murawiec
demands to beat Saudi Arabia. The rabidly Zionist New York Post lifts
its sights to France, "one of America's ugliest enemies" led by
Chirac, "a moral pygmy whose lack of scruples is, fortunately,
balanced by a lack of courage and power." "France should be made to
suffer, strategically and financially. The French stabbed us in the
back. In response, we should skin them alive?, continues the
newspaper, and judging by the Zionist record, it is not just a figure
of speech.

The Jewish state is an extremely dangerous bundle of goods. It is part
of Israeli military doctrine: act crazy, and people will be scared of
you. The bogus threat of nuclear Iraq was modelled on the real threat
of nuclear Israel. Its scientists practice chemical and biological
warfare, as well. They actually tried nerve gas on demonstrators in
Gaza, and water poisoning at the siege of Acre, as reported Abu Sitta
in Al-Ahram.

Israel is involved in a long line of kidnapping and assassinations
carried out on foreign soil. There is no immunity from the long arm of
Israel: they killed in Norway (the notorious Lillehammer affair), they
kidnapped in Rome (Vanunu affair), they bombed British library and
American consulate (Lavon affair), they sunk USS Liberty, they tried
to assassinate Joseph Mugabe, they probably assassinated the
anti-Zionist US Secretary of State James Forrestol, were involved in
the assassination of President Kennedy, as Michael Collins Piper in
<>The Final Judgment<> makes clear, for the American president
insisted on nuclear disarmament of Israel. Recent assassination of
Anna Lindh, the Swedish Foreign Minister, who supported boycott of
Israel, still remains a mystery.

They are not particularly secretive: today we know who assassinated
Count Bernadotte in 1948, and who committed mass murder of German POW
in 1946, and who murdered the Egyptian POWs in 1956, for their
perpetrators boast about it. Tomorrow we shall know who did other
atrocities. But our knowledge won't help, for Israel is a safe haven
for criminals. Whenever caught red-handed, Israel brushed away the
world public opinion, for as Ben Gurion, our first Prime Minister
said, 'what the goyim say is of no importance, only what the Jews do
is of importance'.

This sad record refreshed by the air strike on Syria and the
preparation for nuclear strike on Iran proves there is no way to make
Israel a suitable member of the community of nations. It also answers
the question whether the peace efforts and attempts to roll Israel
back to its old borders are still relevant. They are not. In borders
of 67', 48' or 73', Israel remains a bridgehead of aggression, a
threat to world peace and a physical threat to world leaders. Like the
bloodthirsty sect of Assassins, who once plagued the region,
Israel-supporters undermine or murder better rulers, and support
weaklings who are prepared to act on their orders. Israel's withdrawal
from the West Bank will not change its nature. The leopard can't
change his spots, as Jeremiah the prophet had said (13:23).

Israel's behaviour is partly connected to the Jewish superiority
complex, and its consequence, the apartheid structure. The South
Africa before Mandela also was involved in destruction of its
neighbours, Mozambique and Namibia, and in many plots elsewhere in
Africa. This superiority complex should be treated by dismantling the
apartheid state. The events of last year proved it beyond reasonable
doubt. Dismantlement by peaceful means of democratisation is the only
viable alternative to Israel's otherwise inevitable ruination. While
bringing the brinkmanship policy to the level of 'calculated madness',
Israeli leaders failed to predict they will bring to life a whole
generation that does not care whether they are dead or alive.

Until recently, fear of Israeli retaliation kept its adversaries at
bay. In 1991, the Iraqi president Saddam Hussein had powerful WMD, but
he did not use it against Israel, for he did not feel desperate. He
believed the threat of Israel to destroy Iraq if he uses WMD. He
thought that he could survive the defeat. He did not understand that
Israeli idea of war is drawn on the Jewish religious tradition that
knows no mercy. If Saddam would know that bodies of his tortured sons
would lie in a Baghdad morgue, that he would be turned into a homeless
refugee, that his country will be ruined by ten years of sanctions and
afterwards become prey to Zionist invader, he might be well tempted to
do the Samson solution, and take the Jewish state with him into nether
regions in 1991.

Saddam Hussein is gone, but by now, every leader in the world knows
what he should expect if Israel asks its American Golem for his head.
Paradoxically, the very cruelty of Israel turned its threat into an
empty sound, for if they will do their worst anyway, it makes no sense
to surrender to their demands.

The Jews of Israel repeated the folly of Napoleon in Jaffa. In 1799,
the young Corsican general crossed the Sinai desert and marched north
into Palestine. Rafah and Ramleh surrendered to his troops, for the
Palestinian soldiers saw no reason to fight the passing European
force. Napoleon proceeded to the port of Jaffa, where six thousand
strong garrison of the city also preferred to surrender. They thought
they will be disarmed and sent home, to their villages, but Napoleon
was reluctant to leave so many enemy soldiers behind his lines and
ordered to kill them all. It took the French three days to kill such
mass of people. They were brought in groups from the Armenian St
Nicolas' Convent to the shore and bayoneted.

After this massacre, all Palestine took to weapons. Napoleon's troops
were ambushed at every orange grove, and when he came to the walls of
Acre, there was no talk of surrender. People understood that it just
makes no sense. They could as well die fighting. After a few months of
fruitless efforts, Napoleon turned back, leaving his wounded soldiers
to be slaughtered by advancing enemy. In the gentrified centre of
Jaffa, there is a squat papier?mache figure of le petit caporal in his
triangular hat reminding the tourists and the locals of backfiring
nature of cruelty, but probably the Israeli leaders did not pay it
sufficient attention when their policies brought the country on the
brink of destruction.

The heavy feeling of looming disaster is one of the unmentioned
reasons behind the 'One State Solution' we proposed and advocated.
True, 'one state' would be good for the Palestinians; it would be good
for Israelis. But a new partition, Two States' solution could also
alleviate the Palestinian suffering, as Prof Neumann and many moderate
peace activists rightly noted. It could be even preferred by the
Israeli and Palestinian elites, though an independent state in the
West Bank and Gaza won't solve the problem of refugees. However, in no
way the partition would alleviate the threat to the world peace poised
by the rogue Jewish state, and it won't prevent the imminent disaster
in the Holy Land.

Even a smaller Jewish state will be the seat of Mossad and its
assassination unit, Kidon. Even a smaller Jewish state will possess
nuclear weapons. Even a smaller Jewish state will be poisoned by its
deeply rooted and extremely xenophobic ideology, and will remain a
source of ideological contamination. Even a smaller Jewish state will
be heavily involved in politics of subversion from Moscow to
Washington, DC. And then, it is just a question of time, when a pushed
too far leader of a state ? be it North Korea, Iran, Egypt, or Russia
- will remember the bodies of Saddam' sons and decide to follow the
path of Baibars and of Mongol sultans who removed the Assassins from
their eagle nests. For without Israel, the US forces would hang around
their bases in Georgia and Texas instead of seeking the Jew-haters in
the five continents. Demise of Israel is inevitable; the only question
whether it will be forcibly removed and the land destroyed, or it will
be peacefully absorbed in the region.

Equality in the Holy Land ? it is not only a moral demand; it is the
only way to save the country of approaching destruction. Not us, not
the do-gooders or peace-lovers, but the inevitable course of events
leads us to the choice: equality or death.

Israeli cruelty, vengefulness and inability to respect others called
hundreds of Palestinians to the horrible martyrdom. If, or rather when
a potential martyr will be equipped with a miniaturised nuclear device
instead of home-made dynamite, the sad story of the Jewish state will
be over.

The Jewish belt of Israel is quite small, and just two well-placed
half-megaton nuclear devices can wipe it off the face of Earth. It is
possible that in its last throes, it will make true its threat
vocalised by Prof van Crefeld of Hebrew University and 'go down by
taking the world along', for Israeli nuclear weapons are trained,
according to van Crefeld, at European capitals, as well as on the
neighbours. But no amount of security measures will be able to stop a
nuclear suicide bomber, and she may disregard the fate of people who
failed to protect her and her family.

And then, some years later, the ruins of Tel Aviv will blend smoothly
with the ruins of Arsur.

(i) www.ndtv.com/template/template.asp?template=Palestine&slug=Malaysian%25

See also: Israeli Subs have Nukes Aimed at Iranian Sites
www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?id=1169

-------------



http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=1158

Last updated 19/10/2003

The Jews were given a good chance to strike root in the land of
Palestine and make peace with the native population. But they blew it.

Five to Midnight

By Israel Shamir