LOL! Christofascist Ann Coulter hates Bush's Christian treason also



 Religions > Atheism > LOL! Christofascist Ann Coulter hates Bush's Christian treason also

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Fredric L. Rice"
Date: 23 Feb 2006 10:53:01 PM
Object: LOL! Christofascist Ann Coulter hates Bush's Christian treason also
From aib:
http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/welcome.cgi
SO, THREE MUSLIMS WALK INTO A PORT
February 22, 2006
The idea that the Democrats have any meaningful interest in America's
national security is a joke, so I'm perfectly willing to believe there's
more to this port story.
But Bush is going to need a better justification for turning over
management of our ports to an Arab country than he's come up with so far
- especially now that Jimmy Carter has said it's a good idea. Judging
from his life's work to date, Carter's definition of a good idea is "an
idea likely to hurt America and/or help its enemies."
Bush's defense of the port deal is to say that "those who are
questioning it" need to "step up and explain why all of a sudden a
Middle Eastern company is held to a different standard than a Great
British company."
First of all, it's not "all of a sudden." The phrase you're searching
for, Mr. President, is "ever since the murderous attacks of Sept. 11."
The Bush administration's obstinate refusal to profile Middle Easterners
has been the one massive gaping hole in national security since the 9/11
attacks - attacks that received indirect support from the United Arab
Emirates.
There are at least 3,000 reasons why a company controlled by a Middle
Eastern Muslim emirate should be held to a different standard than a
British company. Many of these reasons are now buried under a gaping
hole that isn't metaphorical in lower Manhattan.
Even four years after 9/11, I note that we don't hear Tony Blair
condemning some cartoons in a Danish newspaper as "a cultural
extremism," or saying their publication represents a "dreadful clash of
civilizations."
That was U.A.E. Minister of Justice and Islamic Affairs Mohammed Al
Dhaheri's recent comment on the great Danish cartoon caper.
So maybe Bush could defend his port deal without insulting our
intelligence by asking why anyone might imagine there's any conceivable
difference between a British company and a United Arab Emirates company.
President Bush has painted himself into a corner on this issue, and he
needs a face-saving compromise to get out of it. Here's my proposal: Let
Harriet Miers run the ports.
Isn't it enough that we're already patronizing the savages over the
cartoons? Do we have to let them operate our ports, too?
The Bush administration defended Muslims rioting over cartoons, saying,
"We certainly understand why Muslims would find these images offensive."
Hey, while they're at it, why don't they invite some Muslim leaders with
well-known ties to terrorism to the White House for a reception? Oh
wait, I forgot ... They did that right after 9/11. Yes, now I see why we
must turn over our ports to the United Arab Emirates.
The University of Illinois has suspended editors of the student
newspaper, The Daily Illini, for republishing the cartoons - even though
the kiss-***** editors ran a column accompanying the cartoons denouncing
them as "bigoted and insensitive."
That was still not enough for Richard Herman, the chancellor of the
university, who wrote a letter to the editor saying that he was
"saddened" by the publication of the cartoons. You want sad? The
University of Illinois' sports teams are known as the "Fighting Illini."
Now they're going to have to change it to the "Surrendering Illini."
Fox News' Bill O'Reilly refuses to show the cartoons on "The O'Reilly
Factor," saying he doesn't want to offend anyone's religion. Someone
should tell him those endless interviews with prostitutes from the Bunny
Ranch and porn stars aren't high on Christians' list of enjoyable
viewing either. (How about adding Prophet Muhammad cartoon T-shirts and
fleece tops to his vast collection of "Factor gear"? Isn't Father's Day
right around the corner? I'd buy those.)
Needless to say, the Treason Times won't show the cartoons that have
incited mass rioting around the globe. At least The New York Times has a
good excuse: It's too busy printing national security secrets that will
get Americans killed. Its pages are already brimming with classified
information about our techniques for spying on terrorists here in
America - no room for newsworthy cartoons! The Pentagon Papers and a
top-secret surveillance program are one thing; cartoons that irritate
Muslims are quite another.
Two days after the Times editorial page justified its decision not to
reprint the cartoons as "a reasonable choice for news organizations that
usually refrain from gratuitous assaults on religious symbols,
especially since the cartoons are so easy to describe in words," the
Times ran a photo of the Virgin Mary covered in cutouts from
pornographic magazines and cow dung - which I seem to have just
described using a handful of common words! Gee, that was easy!
Taking to heart the lesson that violence works, I hereby announce to the
world: I am offended by hotel windows that don't open, pilots chattering
when the passengers are trying to sleep, and Garfield cartoons. Next
time my sleep is disturbed by gibberish about our altitude over Kansas,
the National Pilots Emirate embassy is going down. And mark my words:
One minute after "Garfield II" goes into pre-production, some heads are
gonna roll. Oh - and I'll take the San Diego port, please.
COPYRIGHT 2006 ANN COULTER
---
George W. Bush _is_ a Christian. Get over it!
.

User: "towelie"

Title: Re: LOL! Christofascist Ann Coulter hates Bush's Christian treason also 23 Feb 2006 10:58:01 PM
Fredric L. Rice wrote:

From aib:

http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/welcome.cgi

SO, THREE MUSLIMS WALK INTO A PORT
February 22, 2006

<snip>
This proves that a stopped clock is right twice a day.
.
User: "Alric Knebel"

Title: Re: LOL! Christofascist Ann Coulter hates Bush's Christian treasonalso 25 Feb 2006 10:54:06 AM
towelie wrote:

Fredric L. Rice wrote:

From aib:

http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/welcome.cgi

SO, THREE MUSLIMS WALK INTO A PORT
February 22, 2006



<snip>

This proves that a stopped clock is right twice a day.

LOL! Good one. I'm going to use that in the future.
--
Alric Knebel
http://www.ironeyefortress.com/C-SPAN_loon.html
http://www.ironeyefortress.com
.
User: "Fredric L. Rice"

Title: Re: LOL! Christofascist Ann Coulter hates Bush's Christian treason also 25 Feb 2006 02:58:04 PM
Alric Knebel <alric@[cableone.net]> wrote:

towelie wrote:

Fredric L. Rice wrote:

From aib: http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/welcome.cgi
SO, THREE MUSLIMS WALK INTO A PORT February 22, 2006

<snip> This proves that a stopped clock is right twice a day.

LOL! Good one. I'm going to use that in the future.

What's amusing is that Ann Coulter gets her opinions fed to her by
the Republican Christian extremist right -- which means that her
comments about Bush handing American ports over to the USS Cole
Islamic terrorists was given to her by the religious right.
---
George W. Bush _is_ a Christian. Get over it!
.




  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER