|
|
| User: "The Vicar" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
04 Oct 2007 12:41:56 PM |
|
|
<nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:gc6ag3p1362lsrlk6tbhma3keet98o0emc@4ax.com...
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:58:04 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Hey Hey Hey Good Bye
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/
And Congresses job approval ratings that are lower than Bush's would
indicate *what* to you?
it indicates to me that when "congress" runs for elections "congress" won't
get re-elected. the problem is that "congress" doesnt run for elections your
congressman does. compare apples to apples, moron. cmon, don't let Rush do
all your thinking for you.
http://www.pollingreport.com/CongJob.htm
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "David Morgan \MAMS" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
04 Oct 2007 12:42:50 PM |
|
|
<nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:gc6ag3p1362lsrlk6tbhma3keet98o0emc@4ax.com...
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:58:04 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Hey Hey Hey Good Bye
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/
And Congresses job approval ratings that are lower than Bush's would
indicate *what* to you?
That the blackmail Bush has imposed on the American people cannot
be defeated so long as the democrats do not have enough seats to veto.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
04 Oct 2007 12:09:36 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:58:04 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Hey Hey Hey Good Bye
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/
And Congresses job approval ratings that are lower than Bush's would
indicate *what* to you?
It indicates that things don't change: Congressional approval
ratings are typicall lower than the President's. For
exmaple, if you compare year-by-year Clinton vs. his Congresses:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Clinton_approval_rating.png
against:
http://bp2.blogger.com/_MRs_Nt465oE/Rm7ZtbZBk_I/AAAAAAAABZ0/cNiBApiglng/s1600-h/CongApprovalLATimes20070610.png
you will not find a point where Congressinal approval matches Clinton's
at that time.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
05 Oct 2007 08:02:50 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 17:09:36 +0000 (UTC), (Cary
Kittrell) wrote:
nobody@nowhere.com
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:58:04 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Hey Hey Hey Good Bye
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/
And Congresses job approval ratings that are lower than Bush's would
indicate *what* to you?
It indicates that things don't change: Congressional approval
ratings are typicall lower than the President's. For
exmaple, if you compare year-by-year Clinton vs. his Congresses:
Just as long as you understand that this congress sucks worst than any other.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
05 Oct 2007 12:17:55 PM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 17:09:36 +0000 (UTC), (Cary
Kittrell) wrote:
nobody@nowhere.com
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:58:04 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Hey Hey Hey Good Bye
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/
And Congresses job approval ratings that are lower than Bush's would
indicate *what* to you?
It indicates that things don't change: Congressional approval
ratings are typicall lower than the President's. For
exmaple, if you compare year-by-year Clinton vs. his Congresses:
Just as long as you understand that this congress sucks worst than any other.
Yeah, they probably won't even send Bush a bill letting hike the
debt limit by another $800 billion, like the preceding Congress
did. They're just not very cooperative that way.
-- http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/11/20/politics/main656797.shtml
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Enkidu" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
05 Oct 2007 08:43:25 AM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in
news:qedcg39tf81grb5lv2m96um1pgrrhk7noe@4ax.com:
And Congresses job approval ratings that are lower than Bush's would
indicate *what* to you?
It indicates that things don't change: Congressional approval
ratings are typicall lower than the President's. For
exmaple, if you compare year-by-year Clinton vs. his Congresses:
Just as long as you understand that this congress sucks worst than any
other.
Well, the anti-gay religious hypocritical republican portion seem to be
sucking a lot, that's certain. If they weren't anti-gay and
hypocritical, that would be just fine.
--
Enkidu AA#2165
EAC Chaplain and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA
Freedom is the distance between church and state.
-- bumper sticker
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Brian E. Clark" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
04 Oct 2007 12:41:54 PM |
|
|
In article <gc6ag3p1362lsrlk6tbhma3keet98o0emc@
4ax.com>, said...
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/
And Congresses job approval ratings that are lower than Bush's would
indicate *what* to you?
It indicates what a sheep you are for repeating this
conservative mantra. Clearly you've never given a
moment's thought to the difference between an
individual's approval rating and the rating applied to
a diverse group. For all you know, low congressional
approval ratings could trace to people's
dissatisfaction with unrelenting Republican support
for Bush's policies, or with GOP legislators' tsunamic
of sexual misconduct and hypocrisy.
It's one thing that the GOP spins out transparent,
easily demolished rebuttals. It's quite another that
so many people are, like you, stupid enough to fall
for them.
--
-----------
Brian E. Clark
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
04 Oct 2007 06:42:29 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 13:41:54 -0400, Brian E. Clark
<reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <gc6ag3p1362lsrlk6tbhma3keet98o0emc@
4ax.com>, said...
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/
And Congresses job approval ratings that are lower than Bush's would
indicate *what* to you?
It indicates what a sheep you are for repeating this
conservative mantra. Clearly you've never given a
moment's thought to the difference between an
individual's approval rating and the rating applied to
a diverse group. For all you know, low congressional
approval ratings could trace to people's
dissatisfaction with unrelenting Republican support
for Bush's policies, or with GOP legislators' tsunamic
of sexual misconduct and hypocrisy.
If so, it would be an accuarate mantra. Congressional job approval
ratings are just as poor for Congress as for the President. If you
look further into the ratings of R vs D, they pretty much average out
to about the same. II doubt most people care the President is one
person and Congress is a body. They both have a responsibility to
guide the country and they are BOTH doing a terrible job of it.
It's one thing that the GOP spins out transparent,
easily demolished rebuttals. It's quite another that
so many people are, like you, stupid enough to fall
for them.
Where was I incorrect?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
05 Oct 2007 08:01:31 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 13:41:54 -0400, Brian E. Clark <reply@newsgroup.only.please>
wrote:
In article <gc6ag3p1362lsrlk6tbhma3keet98o0emc@
4ax.com>, said...
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/
And Congresses job approval ratings that are lower than Bush's would
indicate *what* to you?
It indicates what a sheep you are for repeating this
conservative mantra.
But it's TRUE.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Collideascope" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
04 Oct 2007 11:57:54 AM |
|
|
On Oct 4, 11:49 am, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:58:04 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Hey Hey Hey Good Bye
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/
And Congresses job approval ratings that are lower than Bush's would
indicate *what* to you?
http://www.pollingreport.com/CongJob.htm
It indicates to me that the Republicans in Congress are dragging down
the approval ratings of Congress. After all, if you look at the most
recent approval ratings of *Democrats* in Congress, you'll see that
their approval ratings are *higher* than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_dem.htm
And if you look at the most recent approval ratings of *Republicans*
in Congress, you'll see that their approval ratings are even *lower*
than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_rep.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Epper" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
04 Oct 2007 12:21:06 PM |
|
|
Hey stop with those pesky little details known as reality
"Collideascope" <collideascope@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1191517074.493072.174570@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 4, 11:49 am, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:58:04 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Hey Hey Hey Good Bye
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/
And Congresses job approval ratings that are lower than Bush's would
indicate *what* to you?
http://www.pollingreport.com/CongJob.htm
It indicates to me that the Republicans in Congress are dragging down
the approval ratings of Congress. After all, if you look at the most
recent approval ratings of *Democrats* in Congress, you'll see that
their approval ratings are *higher* than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_dem.htm
And if you look at the most recent approval ratings of *Republicans*
in Congress, you'll see that their approval ratings are even *lower*
than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_rep.htm
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
05 Oct 2007 09:45:46 AM |
|
|
On 4 okt, 18:57, Collideascope <collideasc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Oct 4, 11:49 am, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:58:04 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Hey Hey Hey Good Bye
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/
And Congresses job approval ratings that are lower than Bush's would
indicate *what* to you?
http://www.pollingreport.com/CongJob.htm
It indicates to me that the Republicans in Congress are dragging down
the approval ratings of Congress. After all, if you look at the most
recent approval ratings of *Democrats* in Congress, you'll see that
their approval ratings are *higher* than those of Bush:http://pollingreport.com/cong_dem.htm
And if you look at the most recent approval ratings of *Republicans*
in Congress, you'll see that their approval ratings are even *lower*
than those of Bush:http://pollingreport.com/cong_rep.htm
But around may 1, even the republicans were rated higher than te
democrats are now. What mishap overcame US poletics in general?
Peter van Velzen
October 2007
Amstelveen
The Netherlands
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
04 Oct 2007 06:35:46 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 09:57:54 -0700, Collideascope
<collideascope@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Oct 4, 11:49 am, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:58:04 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Hey Hey Hey Good Bye
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/
And Congresses job approval ratings that are lower than Bush's would
indicate *what* to you?
http://www.pollingreport.com/CongJob.htm
It indicates to me that the Republicans in Congress are dragging down
the approval ratings of Congress. After all, if you look at the most
recent approval ratings of *Democrats* in Congress, you'll see that
their approval ratings are *higher* than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_dem.htm
And if you look at the most recent approval ratings of *Republicans*
in Congress, you'll see that their approval ratings are even *lower*
than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_rep.htm
Actually if you look at all the polls in total you'd see the
Republicans rate about as well as the Dems. That's why the "Congress"
poll is a more accurate reflection of how people feel about the whole
of Congress.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Collideascope" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
04 Oct 2007 07:01:58 PM |
|
|
On Oct 4, 6:35 pm, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 09:57:54 -0700, Collideascope
<collideasc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Oct 4, 11:49 am, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:58:04 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Hey Hey Hey Good Bye
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/
And Congresses job approval ratings that are lower than Bush's would
indicate *what* to you?
http://www.pollingreport.com/CongJob.htm
It indicates to me that the Republicans in Congress are dragging down
the approval ratings of Congress. After all, if you look at the most
recent approval ratings of *Democrats* in Congress, you'll see that
their approval ratings are *higher* than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_dem.htm
And if you look at the most recent approval ratings of *Republicans*
in Congress, you'll see that their approval ratings are even *lower*
than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_rep.htm
Actually if you look at all the polls in total you'd see the
Republicans rate about as well as the Dems.
Not only did I look at the polls, I linked to them. See? Right up
there?
They don't show Democrats and Republicans polling "about the same".
They show Democrats in Congress polling higher than President Bush and
Republicans in Congress polling lower than President Bush.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
05 Oct 2007 12:55:10 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:01:58 -0700, Collideascope
<collideascope@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Oct 4, 6:35 pm, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 09:57:54 -0700, Collideascope
<collideasc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Oct 4, 11:49 am, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:58:04 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Hey Hey Hey Good Bye
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/
And Congresses job approval ratings that are lower than Bush's would
indicate *what* to you?
http://www.pollingreport.com/CongJob.htm
It indicates to me that the Republicans in Congress are dragging down
the approval ratings of Congress. After all, if you look at the most
recent approval ratings of *Democrats* in Congress, you'll see that
their approval ratings are *higher* than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_dem.htm
And if you look at the most recent approval ratings of *Republicans*
in Congress, you'll see that their approval ratings are even *lower*
than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_rep.htm
Actually if you look at all the polls in total you'd see the
Republicans rate about as well as the Dems.
Not only did I look at the polls, I linked to them. See? Right up
there?
They don't show Democrats and Republicans polling "about the same".
They show Democrats in Congress polling higher than President Bush and
Republicans in Congress polling lower than President Bush.
Why are Republicans so dishonest?
--
Yang
a.a.#28
"I can hardly wait for your head to explode when the Repubs hold onto
both houses of Congress this November. And Yang can quote me on that."
-Fred Stone, 6/14/2006
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "3806 Dead" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
04 Oct 2007 08:52:59 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 23:35:46 GMT, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 09:57:54 -0700, Collideascope
<collideascope@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Oct 4, 11:49 am, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:58:04 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Hey Hey Hey Good Bye
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/
And Congresses job approval ratings that are lower than Bush's would
indicate *what* to you?
http://www.pollingreport.com/CongJob.htm
It indicates to me that the Republicans in Congress are dragging down
the approval ratings of Congress. After all, if you look at the most
recent approval ratings of *Democrats* in Congress, you'll see that
their approval ratings are *higher* than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_dem.htm
And if you look at the most recent approval ratings of *Republicans*
in Congress, you'll see that their approval ratings are even *lower*
than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_rep.htm
Actually if you look at all the polls in total you'd see the
Republicans rate about as well as the Dems. That's why the "Congress"
poll is a more accurate reflection of how people feel about the whole
of Congress.
Bzzt! Wrong, bucky!
ABC News/Washington Post Poll. Sept. 27-30, 2007. N=1,114 adults
nationwide. MoE ± 3 (for all adults). Fieldwork by TNS.
..
"Overall, how much do you think Congress has accomplished this year: a
great deal, a good amount, not too much, or nothing at all?"
9/27-30/07
..
A Great Deal A Good Amount Not Too Much Nothing At All Unsure
% % % % %
2 14 65 17 1
..
9/27-30/07
Asked of those who said not too much or nothing at all:
"Who would you say deserves most of the blame for that: President Bush
and the Republicans in Congress or the Democrats in Congress?"
Bush and Republicans In Congress Democrats In Congress Both (vol.)
Neither (vol.) Unsure
% % % % %
51 25 20 2 2
--
One of the [Gold Star mothers], Elaine Johnson, recounted a meeting that she had with
President Bush in which he gave her a presidential coin and told her
and five other families: "Don't go sell it on eBay."
--from interview broadcast on NPR
Putsch: leading America to asymetric warfare since 2001
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_news
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_essays
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
05 Oct 2007 05:57:24 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 01:52:59 GMT, 3806 Dead
<zepp22113806@finestplanet.com> wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 23:35:46 GMT, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 09:57:54 -0700, Collideascope
<collideascope@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Oct 4, 11:49 am, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:58:04 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Hey Hey Hey Good Bye
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/
And Congresses job approval ratings that are lower than Bush's would
indicate *what* to you?
http://www.pollingreport.com/CongJob.htm
It indicates to me that the Republicans in Congress are dragging down
the approval ratings of Congress. After all, if you look at the most
recent approval ratings of *Democrats* in Congress, you'll see that
their approval ratings are *higher* than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_dem.htm
And if you look at the most recent approval ratings of *Republicans*
in Congress, you'll see that their approval ratings are even *lower*
than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_rep.htm
Actually if you look at all the polls in total you'd see the
Republicans rate about as well as the Dems. That's why the "Congress"
poll is a more accurate reflection of how people feel about the whole
of Congress.
Bzzt! Wrong, bucky!
ABC News/Washington Post Poll. Sept. 27-30, 2007. N=1,114 adults
nationwide. MoE ± 3 (for all adults). Fieldwork by TNS.
.
"Overall, how much do you think Congress has accomplished this year: a
great deal, a good amount, not too much, or nothing at all?"
9/27-30/07
.
A Great Deal A Good Amount Not Too Much Nothing At All Unsure
% % % % %
2 14 65 17 1
The public seems to agree with me (Not too much =65)
.
9/27-30/07
Asked of those who said not too much or nothing at all:
"Who would you say deserves most of the blame for that: President Bush
and the Republicans in Congress or the Democrats in Congress?"
Bush and Republicans In Congress Democrats In Congress Both (vol.)
Neither (vol.) Unsure
% % % % %
51 25 20 2 2
A fairer question would have been to ask Bush, R's, and D's not
combine Bush and R's. The poll question is meaningless the way it was
asked.
.
|
|
|
| User: "3806 Dead" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
05 Oct 2007 09:13:39 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 10:57:24 GMT, wrote:
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 01:52:59 GMT, 3806 Dead
<zepp22113806@finestplanet.com> wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 23:35:46 GMT, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 09:57:54 -0700, Collideascope
<collideascope@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Oct 4, 11:49 am, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:58:04 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Hey Hey Hey Good Bye
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/
And Congresses job approval ratings that are lower than Bush's would
indicate *what* to you?
http://www.pollingreport.com/CongJob.htm
It indicates to me that the Republicans in Congress are dragging down
the approval ratings of Congress. After all, if you look at the most
recent approval ratings of *Democrats* in Congress, you'll see that
their approval ratings are *higher* than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_dem.htm
And if you look at the most recent approval ratings of *Republicans*
in Congress, you'll see that their approval ratings are even *lower*
than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_rep.htm
Actually if you look at all the polls in total you'd see the
Republicans rate about as well as the Dems. That's why the "Congress"
poll is a more accurate reflection of how people feel about the whole
of Congress.
Bzzt! Wrong, bucky!
ABC News/Washington Post Poll. Sept. 27-30, 2007. N=1,114 adults
nationwide. MoE ± 3 (for all adults). Fieldwork by TNS.
.
"Overall, how much do you think Congress has accomplished this year: a
great deal, a good amount, not too much, or nothing at all?"
9/27-30/07
.
A Great Deal A Good Amount Not Too Much Nothing At All Unsure
% % % % %
2 14 65 17 1
The public seems to agree with me (Not too much =65)
.
9/27-30/07
Asked of those who said not too much or nothing at all:
"Who would you say deserves most of the blame for that: President Bush
and the Republicans in Congress or the Democrats in Congress?"
Bush and Republicans In Congress Democrats In Congress Both (vol.)
Neither (vol.) Unsure
% % % % %
51 25 20 2 2
A fairer question would have been to ask Bush, R's, and D's not
combine Bush and R's. The poll question is meaningless the way it was
asked.
Why? Isn't Putsch a Republican? And don't the Rs in Congress just
act as his rubber stamp?
If the Rs don't filibuster, doesn't Putsch veto?
--
One of the [Gold Star mothers], Elaine Johnson, recounted a meeting that she had with
President Bush in which he gave her a presidential coin and told her
and five other families: "Don't go sell it on eBay."
--from interview broadcast on NPR
Putsch: leading America to asymetric warfare since 2001
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_news
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_essays
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
06 Oct 2007 10:09:14 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 14:13:39 GMT, 3806 Dead
<zepp22113806@finestplanet.com> wrote:
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 10:57:24 GMT, wrote:
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 01:52:59 GMT, 3806 Dead
<zepp22113806@finestplanet.com> wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 23:35:46 GMT, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 09:57:54 -0700, Collideascope
<collideascope@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Oct 4, 11:49 am, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:58:04 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Hey Hey Hey Good Bye
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/
And Congresses job approval ratings that are lower than Bush's would
indicate *what* to you?
http://www.pollingreport.com/CongJob.htm
It indicates to me that the Republicans in Congress are dragging down
the approval ratings of Congress. After all, if you look at the most
recent approval ratings of *Democrats* in Congress, you'll see that
their approval ratings are *higher* than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_dem.htm
And if you look at the most recent approval ratings of *Republicans*
in Congress, you'll see that their approval ratings are even *lower*
than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_rep.htm
Actually if you look at all the polls in total you'd see the
Republicans rate about as well as the Dems. That's why the "Congress"
poll is a more accurate reflection of how people feel about the whole
of Congress.
Bzzt! Wrong, bucky!
ABC News/Washington Post Poll. Sept. 27-30, 2007. N=1,114 adults
nationwide. MoE ± 3 (for all adults). Fieldwork by TNS.
.
"Overall, how much do you think Congress has accomplished this year: a
great deal, a good amount, not too much, or nothing at all?"
9/27-30/07
.
A Great Deal A Good Amount Not Too Much Nothing At All Unsure
% % % % %
2 14 65 17 1
The public seems to agree with me (Not too much =65)
.
9/27-30/07
Asked of those who said not too much or nothing at all:
"Who would you say deserves most of the blame for that: President Bush
and the Republicans in Congress or the Democrats in Congress?"
Bush and Republicans In Congress Democrats In Congress Both (vol.)
Neither (vol.) Unsure
% % % % %
51 25 20 2 2
A fairer question would have been to ask Bush, R's, and D's not
combine Bush and R's. The poll question is meaningless the way it was
asked.
Why? Isn't Putsch a Republican? And don't the Rs in Congress just
act as his rubber stamp?
Bush is the President, a separate branch of the government. Why
wasn't the question asked Hillary and the Democrats? That would be
more balanced but still invalid.
If the Rs don't filibuster, doesn't Putsch veto?
Which has absolutely nothing to do with the way the question was
asked. It invited distorted results since it personalized one answer
but not the other.
.
|
|
|
| User: "3806 Dead" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
06 Oct 2007 10:58:16 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 06 Oct 2007 15:09:14 GMT, wrote:
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 14:13:39 GMT, 3806 Dead
<zepp22113806@finestplanet.com> wrote:
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 10:57:24 GMT, wrote:
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 01:52:59 GMT, 3806 Dead
<zepp22113806@finestplanet.com> wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 23:35:46 GMT, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 09:57:54 -0700, Collideascope
<collideascope@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Oct 4, 11:49 am, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:58:04 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Hey Hey Hey Good Bye
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/
And Congresses job approval ratings that are lower than Bush's would
indicate *what* to you?
http://www.pollingreport.com/CongJob.htm
It indicates to me that the Republicans in Congress are dragging down
the approval ratings of Congress. After all, if you look at the most
recent approval ratings of *Democrats* in Congress, you'll see that
their approval ratings are *higher* than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_dem.htm
And if you look at the most recent approval ratings of *Republicans*
in Congress, you'll see that their approval ratings are even *lower*
than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_rep.htm
Actually if you look at all the polls in total you'd see the
Republicans rate about as well as the Dems. That's why the "Congress"
poll is a more accurate reflection of how people feel about the whole
of Congress.
Bzzt! Wrong, bucky!
ABC News/Washington Post Poll. Sept. 27-30, 2007. N=1,114 adults
nationwide. MoE ± 3 (for all adults). Fieldwork by TNS.
.
"Overall, how much do you think Congress has accomplished this year: a
great deal, a good amount, not too much, or nothing at all?"
9/27-30/07
.
A Great Deal A Good Amount Not Too Much Nothing At All Unsure
% % % % %
2 14 65 17 1
The public seems to agree with me (Not too much =65)
.
9/27-30/07
Asked of those who said not too much or nothing at all:
"Who would you say deserves most of the blame for that: President Bush
and the Republicans in Congress or the Democrats in Congress?"
Bush and Republicans In Congress Democrats In Congress Both (vol.)
Neither (vol.) Unsure
% % % % %
51 25 20 2 2
A fairer question would have been to ask Bush, R's, and D's not
combine Bush and R's. The poll question is meaningless the way it was
asked.
Why? Isn't Putsch a Republican? And don't the Rs in Congress just
act as his rubber stamp?
Bush is the President, a separate branch of the government. Why
wasn't the question asked Hillary and the Democrats? That would be
more balanced but still invalid.
Well, you DID start this by comparing Congress' approval rating to
those of Putsch. And I note that Hillary isn't President.
If the Rs don't filibuster, doesn't Putsch veto?
Which has absolutely nothing to do with the way the question was
asked. It invited distorted results since it personalized one answer
but not the other.
Breaking it down by parties personalises it, but breaking it down by
institutions doesn't?
The poll makes the political truth you are tring to obscure plain.
People are fed up with Putsch, and they are disgusted with Congress
for faliing to stop him.
And they blame Republicans for it.
--
One of the [Gold Star mothers], Elaine Johnson, recounted a meeting that she had with
President Bush in which he gave her a presidential coin and told her
and five other families: "Don't go sell it on eBay."
--from interview broadcast on NPR
Putsch: leading America to asymetric warfare since 2001
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_news
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_essays
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Collideascope" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
05 Oct 2007 08:26:59 AM |
|
|
On Oct 5, 5:57 am, wrote:
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 01:52:59 GMT, 3806 Dead
<zepp22113...@finestplanet.com> wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 23:35:46 GMT, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 09:57:54 -0700, Collideascope
<collideasc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Oct 4, 11:49 am, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:58:04 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Hey Hey Hey Good Bye
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-=
low/
And Congresses job approval ratings that are lower than Bush's would
indicate *what* to you?
http://www.pollingreport.com/CongJob.htm
It indicates to me that the Republicans in Congress are dragging down
the approval ratings of Congress. After all, if you look at the most
recent approval ratings of *Democrats* in Congress, you'll see that
their approval ratings are *higher* than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_dem.htm
And if you look at the most recent approval ratings of *Republicans*
in Congress, you'll see that their approval ratings are even *lower*
than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_rep.htm
Actually if you look at all the polls in total you'd see the
Republicans rate about as well as the Dems. That's why the "Congress"
poll is a more accurate reflection of how people feel about the whole
of Congress.
Bzzt! Wrong, bucky!
ABC News/Washington Post Poll. Sept. 27-30, 2007. N=3D1,114 adults
nationwide. MoE =B1 3 (for all adults). Fieldwork by TNS.
.
"Overall, how much do you think Congress has accomplished this year: a
great deal, a good amount, not too much, or nothing at all?"
9/27-30/07
.
A Great Deal A Good Amount Not Too Much Nothing At All Unsu=
re
% % % % %
2 14 65 17 1
The public seems to agree with me (Not too much =3D65)
.
9/27-30/07 =20
Asked of those who said not too much or nothing at all:
"Who would you say deserves most of the blame for that: President Bush
and the Republicans in Congress or the Democrats in Congress?"
Bush and Republicans In Congress Democrats In Congress Both (vol.)
Neither (vol.) Unsure
% % % % %
51 25 20 2 2
A fairer question would have been to ask Bush, R's, and D's not
combine Bush and R's. The poll question is meaningless the way it was
asked.
Yes, that would be handy. I wish some pollster had asked those
questions, so that I could link to them.
Oh, wait! Pollsters *did* ask just those questions! And I *did* link
to them! And you even responded to the post in which I did so.
Once again, let us revisit ...
The most recent approval ratings of *Democrats* in Congress show that
their approval ratings are *higher* than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_dem.htm
The most recent approval ratings of *Republicans* in Congress show
that
their approval ratings are *lower* than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_rep.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
06 Oct 2007 10:06:20 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 06:26:59 -0700, Collideascope
<collideascope@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Oct 5, 5:57 am, wrote:
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 01:52:59 GMT, 3806 Dead
<zepp22113...@finestplanet.com> wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 23:35:46 GMT, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 09:57:54 -0700, Collideascope
<collideasc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Oct 4, 11:49 am, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:58:04 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Hey Hey Hey Good Bye
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/
And Congresses job approval ratings that are lower than Bush's would
indicate *what* to you?
http://www.pollingreport.com/CongJob.htm
It indicates to me that the Republicans in Congress are dragging down
the approval ratings of Congress. After all, if you look at the most
recent approval ratings of *Democrats* in Congress, you'll see that
their approval ratings are *higher* than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_dem.htm
And if you look at the most recent approval ratings of *Republicans*
in Congress, you'll see that their approval ratings are even *lower*
than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_rep.htm
Actually if you look at all the polls in total you'd see the
Republicans rate about as well as the Dems. That's why the "Congress"
poll is a more accurate reflection of how people feel about the whole
of Congress.
Bzzt! Wrong, bucky!
ABC News/Washington Post Poll. Sept. 27-30, 2007. N=1,114 adults
nationwide. MoE ± 3 (for all adults). Fieldwork by TNS.
.
"Overall, how much do you think Congress has accomplished this year: a
great deal, a good amount, not too much, or nothing at all?"
9/27-30/07
.
A Great Deal A Good Amount Not Too Much Nothing At All Unsure
% % % % %
2 14 65 17 1
The public seems to agree with me (Not too much =65)
.
9/27-30/07
Asked of those who said not too much or nothing at all:
"Who would you say deserves most of the blame for that: President Bush
and the Republicans in Congress or the Democrats in Congress?"
Bush and Republicans In Congress Democrats In Congress Both (vol.)
Neither (vol.) Unsure
% % % % %
51 25 20 2 2
A fairer question would have been to ask Bush, R's, and D's not
combine Bush and R's. The poll question is meaningless the way it was
asked.
Yes, that would be handy. I wish some pollster had asked those
questions, so that I could link to them.
Oh, wait! Pollsters *did* ask just those questions! And I *did* link
to them! And you even responded to the post in which I did so.
Once again, let us revisit ...
The most recent approval ratings of *Democrats* in Congress show that
their approval ratings are *higher* than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_dem.htm
The most recent approval ratings of *Republicans* in Congress show
that
their approval ratings are *lower* than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_rep.htm
I was referring to the specific quotation. It's a biased poll that
asks the question: "Who deserves the blame, the Democrats in Congress
or Bush AND the Republicans in Congress"? If they don't ask Dems,
Reps, President separately, they are distorting the results.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Collideascope" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
06 Oct 2007 10:20:20 AM |
|
|
On Oct 6, 10:06 am, wrote:
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 06:26:59 -0700, Collideascope
<collideasc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Oct 5, 5:57 am, wrote:
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 01:52:59 GMT, 3806 Dead
<zepp22113...@finestplanet.com> wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 23:35:46 GMT, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 09:57:54 -0700, Collideascope
<collideasc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Oct 4, 11:49 am, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:58:04 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Hey Hey Hey Good Bye
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-n=
ew-low/
And Congresses job approval ratings that are lower than Bush's wo=
uld
indicate *what* to you?
http://www.pollingreport.com/CongJob.htm
It indicates to me that the Republicans in Congress are dragging do=
wn
the approval ratings of Congress. After all, if you look at the mo=
st
recent approval ratings of *Democrats* in Congress, you'll see that
their approval ratings are *higher* than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_dem.htm
And if you look at the most recent approval ratings of *Republicans*
in Congress, you'll see that their approval ratings are even *lower*
than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_rep.htm
Actually if you look at all the polls in total you'd see the
Republicans rate about as well as the Dems. That's why the "Congres=
s"
poll is a more accurate reflection of how people feel about the whole
of Congress.
Bzzt! Wrong, bucky!
ABC News/Washington Post Poll. Sept. 27-30, 2007. N=3D1,114 adults
nationwide. MoE =B1 3 (for all adults). Fieldwork by TNS.
.
"Overall, how much do you think Congress has accomplished this year: a
great deal, a good amount, not too much, or nothing at all?"
9/27-30/07
.
A Great Deal A Good Amount Not Too Much Nothing At All U=
nsure
% % % % %
2 14 65 17 1
The public seems to agree with me (Not too much =3D65)
.
9/27-30/07 =20
Asked of those who said not too much or nothing at all:
"Who would you say deserves most of the blame for that: President Bush
and the Republicans in Congress or the Democrats in Congress?"
Bush and Republicans In Congress Democrats In Congress Both (vol.)
Neither (vol.) Unsure
% % % % %
51 25 20 2 2
A fairer question would have been to ask Bush, R's, and D's not
combine Bush and R's. The poll question is meaningless the way it was
asked.
Yes, that would be handy. I wish some pollster had asked those
questions, so that I could link to them.
Oh, wait! Pollsters *did* ask just those questions! And I *did* link
to them! And you even responded to the post in which I did so.
Once again, let us revisit ...
The most recent approval ratings of *Democrats* in Congress show that
their approval ratings are *higher* than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_dem.htm
The most recent approval ratings of *Republicans* in Congress show
that
their approval ratings are *lower* than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_rep.htm
I was referring to the specific quotation. It's a biased poll that
asks the question: "Who deserves the blame, the Democrats in Congress
or Bush AND the Republicans in Congress"? If they don't ask Dems,
Reps, President separately, they are distorting the results.
And I'm trying to get it through your thick head that the questions
*have* been asked separately. Of course, you actually would have had
to click your mouse once on each of the two links I posted in order to
find that out, and I suppose you couldn't be bothered to make such an
extraordinary effort. Fine -- I'll bring the specific quote out to
you.
Once again, see this link?
http://pollingreport.com/cong_dem.htm
From 09/27/07 thru 09/30/07, the following question was asked by ABC
News/Washington Post:
"Do you approve or disapprove of the way the Democrats in Congress are
doing their job?"
Result? 38% approval
Now, see this link?
http://pollingreport.com/cong_rep.htm
From 09/27/07 thru 09/30/07, the following question was asked by ABC
News/Washington Post:
"Do you approve or disapprove of the way the Republicans Congress are
doing their job?"
Result? 29%
Note that this question was asked *solely* about the Republicans in
Congress.
Finally, see this link?
From 10/01/07 thru 10/03/07, the following question was asked by
Associated Press/Ipsos:
http://pollingreport.com/BushJob1.htm
"Overall, do you approve, disapprove or have mixed feelings about the
way George W. Bush is handling his job as president?"
Result? 31%
Note that this question was asked *solely* about the President.
Let's summarize:
1) The questions *have* been asked, respectively, about Congressional
Democrats, Congressional Republicans, and President Bush.
Respectively. Separately. As in, *not* tying President Bush together
with the Congressional Republicans. Do you *finally* get it?
2) Congressional Democrats are polling *higher* than President Bush.
3) Congressional Republicans are polling *lower* than President Bush.
Any more questions?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "3806 Dead" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
06 Oct 2007 11:28:01 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 06 Oct 2007 15:06:20 GMT, wrote:
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 06:26:59 -0700, Collideascope
<collideascope@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Oct 5, 5:57 am, wrote:
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 01:52:59 GMT, 3806 Dead
<zepp22113...@finestplanet.com> wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 23:35:46 GMT, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 09:57:54 -0700, Collideascope
<collideasc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Oct 4, 11:49 am, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:58:04 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Hey Hey Hey Good Bye
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/
And Congresses job approval ratings that are lower than Bush's would
indicate *what* to you?
http://www.pollingreport.com/CongJob.htm
It indicates to me that the Republicans in Congress are dragging down
the approval ratings of Congress. After all, if you look at the most
recent approval ratings of *Democrats* in Congress, you'll see that
their approval ratings are *higher* than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_dem.htm
And if you look at the most recent approval ratings of *Republicans*
in Congress, you'll see that their approval ratings are even *lower*
than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_rep.htm
Actually if you look at all the polls in total you'd see the
Republicans rate about as well as the Dems. That's why the "Congress"
poll is a more accurate reflection of how people feel about the whole
of Congress.
Bzzt! Wrong, bucky!
ABC News/Washington Post Poll. Sept. 27-30, 2007. N=1,114 adults
nationwide. MoE ± 3 (for all adults). Fieldwork by TNS.
.
"Overall, how much do you think Congress has accomplished this year: a
great deal, a good amount, not too much, or nothing at all?"
9/27-30/07
.
A Great Deal A Good Amount Not Too Much Nothing At All Unsure
% % % % %
2 14 65 17 1
The public seems to agree with me (Not too much =65)
.
9/27-30/07
Asked of those who said not too much or nothing at all:
"Who would you say deserves most of the blame for that: President Bush
and the Republicans in Congress or the Democrats in Congress?"
Bush and Republicans In Congress Democrats In Congress Both (vol.)
Neither (vol.) Unsure
% % % % %
51 25 20 2 2
A fairer question would have been to ask Bush, R's, and D's not
combine Bush and R's. The poll question is meaningless the way it was
asked.
Yes, that would be handy. I wish some pollster had asked those
questions, so that I could link to them.
Oh, wait! Pollsters *did* ask just those questions! And I *did* link
to them! And you even responded to the post in which I did so.
Once again, let us revisit ...
The most recent approval ratings of *Democrats* in Congress show that
their approval ratings are *higher* than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_dem.htm
The most recent approval ratings of *Republicans* in Congress show
that
their approval ratings are *lower* than those of Bush:
http://pollingreport.com/cong_rep.htm
I was referring to the specific quotation. It's a biased poll that
asks the question: "Who deserves the blame, the Democrats in Congress
or Bush AND the Republicans in Congress"? If they don't ask Dems,
Reps, President separately, they are distorting the results.
Oh, please. When was the last time you saw the Republicans in
Congress oppose Putsch on anything?
--
One of the [Gold Star mothers], Elaine Johnson, recounted a meeting that she had with
President Bush in which he gave her a presidential coin and told her
and five other families: "Don't go sell it on eBay."
--from interview broadcast on NPR
Putsch: leading America to asymetric warfare since 2001
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_news
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_essays
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
05 Oct 2007 08:01:05 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 09:57:54 -0700, Collideascope <collideascope@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Oct 4, 11:49 am, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:58:04 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Hey Hey Hey Good Bye
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/
And Congresses job approval ratings that are lower than Bush's would
indicate *what* to you?
http://www.pollingreport.com/CongJob.htm
It indicates to me that the Republicans in Congress are dragging down
the approval ratings of Congress.
Haahaahaahaahaa. It's didn't drop that far down until infested with 'rats.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
05 Oct 2007 11:32:11 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 08:01:05 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in
message news:<kbdcg3h8u8rkvvunbpfo8obl14cti3f0pb@4ax.com>:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 09:57:54 -0700, Collideascope <collideascope@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Oct 4, 11:49 am, wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:58:04 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Nah Hey Hey Hey Good Bye
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/bushs-approval-rating-hits-new-low/
And Congresses job approval ratings that are lower than Bush's would
indicate *what* to you?
http://www.pollingreport.com/CongJob.htm
It indicates to me that the Republicans in Congress are dragging down
the approval ratings of Congress.
Haahaahaahaahaa. It's didn't drop that far down until infested with 'rats.
Yes, but only because of Bush and the Republicans, as the poll shows. Bush
is practically handing the 2008 election to the Democrats. You can thank
him in 2009 when you start complaining about President Hillary.
--
Bushism 4-13:
"Keep good relations with the Grecians."
--As quoted in the Economist; June 12, 1999
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
06 Oct 2007 06:40:21 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 16:32:11 -0000, Bill Baker <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>
wrote:
It indicates to me that the Republicans in Congress are dragging down
the approval ratings of Congress.
Haahaahaahaahaa. It's didn't drop that far down until infested with 'rats.
Yes, but only because of Bush and the Republicans, as the poll shows. Bush
is practically handing the 2008 election to the Democrats. You can thank
him in 2009 when you start complaining about President Hillary.
If billiary gets in, hang on to your pocketbook. It will be tax, tax, tax.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "funk420" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
06 Oct 2007 09:19:14 AM |
|
|
On Oct 6, 7:40 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 16:32:11 -0000, Bill Baker <wba...@postini.spamcon.org>
wrote:
It indicates to me that the Republicans in Congress are dragging down
the approval ratings of Congress.
Haahaahaahaahaa. It's didn't drop that far down until infested with 'rats.
Yes, but only because of Bush and the Republicans, as the poll shows. Bush
is practically handing the 2008 election to the Democrats. You can thank
him in 2009 when you start complaining about President Hillary.
If billiary gets in, hang on to your pocketbook. It will be tax, tax, tax.
Well the Bushi'ites will be happy with that I guess..
but no way she could increase the size of government as much as these
guys have.
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Loser Bush Bounces To... 31%!!!!! (GOP=Treason) |
06 Oct 2007 11:07:37 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 06 Oct 2007 07:19:14 -0700, funk420 <funk420@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Oct 6, 7:40 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 16:32:11 -0000, Bill Baker <wba...@postini.spamcon.org>
wrote:
It indicates to me that the Republicans in Congress are dragging down
the approval ratings of Congress.
Haahaahaahaahaa. It's didn't drop that far down until infested with 'rats.
Yes, but only because of Bush and the Republicans, as the poll shows. Bush
is practically handing the 2008 election to the Democrats. You can thank
him in 2009 when you start complaining about President Hillary.
If billiary gets in, hang on to your pocketbook. It will be tax, tax, tax.
Well the Bushi'ites will be happy with that I guess..
but no way she could increase the size of government as much as these
guys have.
You're not listening to her, are you?
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
