| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Budikka666" |
| Date: |
20 Sep 2006 04:35:44 PM |
| Object: |
'Lucy's baby' found in Ethiopia |
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/5363328.stm
"The 3.3-million-year-old fossilised remains of a human-like child have
been unearthed in Ethiopia's Dikika region. The female
Australopithecus afarensis bones are from the same species as an adult
skeleton found in 1974 which was nicknamed 'Lucy'."
Budikka
.
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: The Overwhelming Evidence of Human Evolution |
21 Sep 2006 05:09:15 PM |
|
|
Nature reports on the newest addition to your extended family:
http://www.nature.com/news/2006/060918/full/060918-5.html
A cute little 3 year old called Selam.
And here's the rest of the family, lined up for a portrait:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/hominids.html
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "just nobody" |
|
| Title: Re: The Overwhelming Evidence of Human Evolution |
24 Sep 2006 11:08:41 AM |
|
|
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1158876555.380792.269280@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
Nature reports on the newest addition to your extended family:
http://www.nature.com/news/2006/060918/full/060918-5.html
A cute little 3 year old called Selam.
And here's the rest of the family, lined up for a portrait:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/hominids.html
Budikka
all the found is a skull this is not proof.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pangur Ban" |
|
| Title: Re: The Overwhelming Evidence of Human Evolution |
24 Sep 2006 07:42:00 PM |
|
|
"just nobody" <nobody@nobody.com> wrote in
news:d4yRg.20580$R63.10651@pd7urf1no:
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1158876555.380792.269280@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
Nature reports on the newest addition to your extended family:
http://www.nature.com/news/2006/060918/full/060918-5.html
A cute little 3 year old called Selam.
And here's the rest of the family, lined up for a portrait:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/hominids.html
Budikka
all the found is a skull this is not proof.
Although many other samples of A. afarensis have been found before, this
is the first one reported to come complete with a whole shoulder-blade
bone (scapula). In modern humans the scapula has a ridge running
horizontally across the top of the bone; in apes the scapula's ridge
reaches further down the back, where it can help to throw more muscle
into arm action, as would be needed to swing from trees. In the young A.
afarensis, the scapula looks to be part-way between.
http://www.nature.com/news/2006/060918/full/060918-5.html
Try again.
Pang
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: The Overwhelming Evidence of Human Evolution |
25 Sep 2006 04:29:13 PM |
|
|
Pangur Ban wrote:
"just nobody" <nobody@nobody.com> wrote in
news:d4yRg.20580$R63.10651@pd7urf1no:
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1158876555.380792.269280@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
Nature reports on the newest addition to your extended family:
http://www.nature.com/news/2006/060918/full/060918-5.html
A cute little 3 year old called Selam.
And here's the rest of the family, lined up for a portrait:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/hominids.html
Budikka
all the found is a skull this is not proof.
Although many other samples of A. afarensis have been found before, this
is the first one reported to come complete with a whole shoulder-blade
bone (scapula). In modern humans the scapula has a ridge running
horizontally across the top of the bone; in apes the scapula's ridge
reaches further down the back, where it can help to throw more muscle
into arm action, as would be needed to swing from trees. In the young A.
afarensis, the scapula looks to be part-way between.
http://www.nature.com/news/2006/060918/full/060918-5.html
Try again.
Pang
Actually I'd say that the hyoid bone discovery was more valuable. As
P.Z. Myers explains:
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2006/09/33_million_years_old_3_years_o.php
the "...bone is chimpanzee-like, and implies chimp-like vocalization
abilities. She had a long way to go before she could have a
conversation."
There are two great pictures of the skull there, too.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark D J. Mark D" |
|
| Title: Re: The Overwhelming Evidence of Human Evolution |
24 Sep 2006 01:01:11 PM |
|
|
"just nobody" <nobody@nobody.com> wrote in message
news:d4yRg.20580$R63.10651@pd7urf1no...
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1158876555.380792.269280@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
Nature reports on the newest addition to your extended family:
http://www.nature.com/news/2006/060918/full/060918-5.html
A cute little 3 year old called Selam.
And here's the rest of the family, lined up for a portrait:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/hominids.html
all the found is a skull this is not proof.
Oooh, you bloody liar!! They found the *skull*; the *body*; and the major
parts of *all four limbs*!!
What would mommy think if she saw you telling such terrible lies?? You
should be *ashamed*!!!
M.
.
|
|
|
| User: "=?iso-8859-1?B?V+tuZONsZW4=?=" |
|
| Title: Re: The Overwhelming Evidence of Human Evolution |
24 Sep 2006 05:17:21 PM |
|
|
"Mark D J." <Mark D J.@hoyme.com> wrote in message
news:HJzRg.11798$t4.10451@newsfe3-win.ntli.net...
Oooh, you bloody liar!! They found the *skull*; the *body*; and the major
parts of *all four limbs*!!
What would mommy think if she saw you telling such terrible lies?? You
should be *ashamed*!!!
When someone lies in the name of god they don't consider it real "lies."
--
WE.....
"Men never do evil so completely and
cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction."
~ Blaise Pascal (1623-1662) ~
~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~* ~~*
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: The Overwhelming Evidence of Human Evolution |
24 Sep 2006 06:02:17 PM |
|
|
"just nobody" <nobody@nobody.com> wrote in message
news:d4yRg.20580$R63.10651@pd7urf1no...
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1158876555.380792.269280@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
Nature reports on the newest addition to your extended family:
http://www.nature.com/news/2006/060918/full/060918-5.html
A cute little 3 year old called Selam.
And here's the rest of the family, lined up for a portrait:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/hominids.html
Budikka
all the found is a skull this is not proof.
That is not true. They found an almost complete
skeleton. More bones, in fact, than they found of
Lucy. Get your facts straight before you make an
even bigger fool of yourself. Selam is a marvelous
find. And, she's even older than Lucy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vance Liscomb" |
|
| Title: Re: The Overwhelming Evidence of Human Evolution |
24 Sep 2006 06:32:50 PM |
|
|
In article <HZ6dnfFsZIKck4rYnZ2dnUVZ_vadnZ2d@comcast.com>, Michelle Malkin
says...
"just nobody" <nobody@nobody.com> wrote in message
news:d4yRg.20580$R63.10651@pd7urf1no...
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1158876555.380792.269280@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
Nature reports on the newest addition to your extended family:
http://www.nature.com/news/2006/060918/full/060918-5.html
A cute little 3 year old called Selam.
And here's the rest of the family, lined up for a portrait:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/hominids.html
Budikka
all the found is a skull this is not proof.
That is not true. They found an almost complete
skeleton. More bones, in fact, than they found of
Lucy. Get your facts straight before you make an
even bigger fool of yourself. Selam is a marvelous
find. And, she's even older than Lucy.
Where is your proof that Dr. John Baumgardner is dead? This is the third time
I've asked.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Řien" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: The Overwhelming Evidence of Human Evolution |
24 Sep 2006 07:08:10 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:02:17 -0400, "Michelle Malkin"
<hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"just nobody" <nobody@nobody.com> wrote in message
news:d4yRg.20580$R63.10651@pd7urf1no...
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1158876555.380792.269280@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
Nature reports on the newest addition to your extended family:
http://www.nature.com/news/2006/060918/full/060918-5.html
A cute little 3 year old called Selam.
And here's the rest of the family, lined up for a portrait:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/hominids.html
Budikka
all the found is a skull this is not proof.
That is not true. They found an almost complete
skeleton. More bones, in fact, than they found of
Lucy. Get your facts straight before you make an
even bigger fool of yourself. Selam is a marvelous
find. And, she's even older than Lucy.
It does make one wonder why somebody would post something so false when
the Internet if full of the truth.
.....
"Get your facts first, and then you can distort
them as much as you please." (Mark Twain)
.....
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: The Overwhelming Evidence of Human Evolution |
28 Sep 2006 11:05:28 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:08:41 GMT, "just nobody" <nobody@nobody.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1158876555.380792.269280@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
Nature reports on the newest addition to your extended family:
http://www.nature.com/news/2006/060918/full/060918-5.html
A cute little 3 year old called Selam.
And here's the rest of the family, lined up for a portrait:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/hominids.html
Budikka
all the found is a skull this is not proof.
So drools a mindless ignoramous. Run along and play with your imaginary
friend and leave the adults be.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Řien" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: The Overwhelming Evidence of Human Evolution |
24 Sep 2006 05:03:54 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:08:41 GMT, "just nobody" <nobody@nobody.com>
wrote:
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1158876555.380792.269280@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
Nature reports on the newest addition to your extended family:
http://www.nature.com/news/2006/060918/full/060918-5.html
A cute little 3 year old called Selam.
And here's the rest of the family, lined up for a portrait:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/hominids.html
Budikka
all the found is a skull this is not proof.
You'll never accept proof - even if it hits you on the head. You're so
closed-minded, you've given up your free will and become another
undistinguishable lemming who believes exactly what his thought-meisters
tell him to believe. Why would any god want a person in heaven who
spends his life with his head in the sand?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lucifer" |
|
| Title: Re: The Overwhelming Evidence of Human Evolution |
30 Sep 2006 05:46:05 PM |
|
|
=D8ien wrote:
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:08:41 GMT, "just nobody" <nobody@nobody.com>
wrote:
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1158876555.380792.269280@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
Nature reports on the newest addition to your extended family:
http://www.nature.com/news/2006/060918/full/060918-5.html
A cute little 3 year old called Selam.
And here's the rest of the family, lined up for a portrait:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/hominids.html
Budikka
all the found is a skull this is not proof.
You'll never accept proof - even if it hits you on the head. You're so
closed-minded, you've given up your free will and become another
undistinguishable lemming who believes exactly what his thought-meisters
tell him to believe. Why would any god want a person in heaven who
spends his life with his head in the sand?#
BANG! the irony meter bites the dust yet again...
Ask yourself the same questions you fuckwit godbot.
Cite some evidence FOR ID before you come back here, or you'll be
heftily flamed. I have yet to see any godbot provide any evidence for
ID, and the anti science crap they spout is easily debunked, so FOAD
.
|
|
|
| User: "His Eminence the Most Reverend Donki" |
|
| Title: Re: The Overwhelming Evidence of Human Evolution |
03 Oct 2006 04:54:10 PM |
|
|
How did domestic grain evolve?
Can you inform me where I can see transitionaries or even their fossils
today please.
How did consciousness and reason evolve?
Have you ever seen our closest cousin in the Animal Kingdom pondering life
and the universe?
How does evolution explain such a marked difference between our "cousins"
and us when theoretically we are supposed to be so close. How did this
unprecedented leap of "progress" suddenly occur and in such a short time on
the otherwise lengthy evolutionary timeline. Again where are the
transitionaries? Why do we see us today and then nothing between us and our
alleged hairy forebears? Why did evolution suddenly stop? Why are we not
seeing any "next stage" evolution in real time. In fact why do we see no
evolution of any kind in real time that we can measure?
Creationism and Evolutionism are two peas in a pod and it boils down to
intelligent creation vs non intelligent creation. Neither has all the
answers and most likely never will.
So instead of wasting life debating over unresolvables why not just Party,
Party Party!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: The Overwhelming Evidence of Human Evolution |
24 Sep 2006 12:38:09 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:08:41 GMT, in alt.talk.creationism
"just nobody" <nobody@nobody.com> wrote in
<d4yRg.20580$R63.10651@pd7urf1no>:
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1158876555.380792.269280@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
Nature reports on the newest addition to your extended family:
http://www.nature.com/news/2006/060918/full/060918-5.html
A cute little 3 year old called Selam.
And here's the rest of the family, lined up for a portrait:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/hominids.html
Budikka
all the found is a skull this is not proof.
Gather all of the evidence. Notice that all of it is consistent with
evolution. Notice that there is no evidence that leads us to accept
'intelligent design' or anti-evolutionary creationism.
Facts matter. Doctrines have to fit the facts. If your doctrines are
contrary to the facts, your doctrines are false.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lucifer" |
|
| Title: Re: The Overwhelming Evidence of Human Evolution |
30 Sep 2006 05:42:44 PM |
|
|
just nobody wrote:
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1158876555.380792.269280@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
Nature reports on the newest addition to your extended family:
http://www.nature.com/news/2006/060918/full/060918-5.html
A cute little 3 year old called Selam.
And here's the rest of the family, lined up for a portrait:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/hominids.html
Budikka
all the found is a skull this is not proof.
A skull tells aus a lot, including brain size.
This is another missing link that supports evolution and shoots down
cretinism.
What's the betting this moron's skull is filled instead with mental
compost?
--
Lucifer, EAC Librarian of Dark Tomes of Excessive Evil and General
Purpose Igor
"Don't worry, I won't bite.......hard"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: The Overwhelming Evidence of Human Evolution |
25 Sep 2006 04:19:17 PM |
|
|
just nobody wrote:
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1158876555.380792.269280@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
Nature reports on the newest addition to your extended family:
http://www.nature.com/news/2006/060918/full/060918-5.html
A cute little 3 year old called Selam.
And here's the rest of the family, lined up for a portrait:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/hominids.html
Budikka
all the found is a skull this is not proof.
How someone who cannot even count manages to get onto the Internet is a
far bigger mystery than human origins.
And where was the word "proof" used? If you cannot read the thread
title, what on Earth leads you to imagine that you can comment on the
material within? Or is it just another blind belief of yours?
So you want to talk proof?
Where's your proof that there's a god who created us just 6,000 or so
years ago? Let's examine that, shall we (hint, the Bible isn't proof)?
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Human Evolution Demonstrated Yet Again |
30 Sep 2006 07:00:24 AM |
|
|
http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2006/09/fun_with_homini.html#more
charts cranial capacity against time for adult hominins and shows that
there are no unbridgeable gaps in the fossil record. It's a steady
curve upwards over 3.5 million years.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Human Evolution Demonstrated Yet Again |
30 Sep 2006 05:19:04 PM |
|
|
On 30 Sep 2006 05:00:24 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net>
wrote in alt.atheism
http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2006/09/fun_with_homini.html#more
charts cranial capacity against time for adult hominins and shows that
there are no unbridgeable gaps in the fossil record. It's a steady
curve upwards over 3.5 million years.
Cretinists aren't interested in facts.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Human Evolution Demonstrated Yet Again |
30 Sep 2006 05:34:13 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 15:19:04 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <barth2d63lhig984isnuqi5pu7ogvi66i1@4ax.com>
On 30 Sep 2006 05:00:24 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net>
wrote in alt.atheism
http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2006/09/fun_with_homini.html#more
charts cranial capacity against time for adult hominins and shows that
there are no unbridgeable gaps in the fossil record. It's a steady
curve upwards over 3.5 million years.
Cretinists aren't interested in facts.
They *are* interested.
Interested in suppressing them!
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Human Evolution Demonstrated Yet Again |
02 Oct 2006 01:04:02 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 08:04:13 +0930, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in alt.atheism
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 15:19:04 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <barth2d63lhig984isnuqi5pu7ogvi66i1@4ax.com>
On 30 Sep 2006 05:00:24 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net>
wrote in alt.atheism
http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2006/09/fun_with_homini.html#more
charts cranial capacity against time for adult hominins and shows that
there are no unbridgeable gaps in the fossil record. It's a steady
curve upwards over 3.5 million years.
Cretinists aren't interested in facts.
They *are* interested.
Interested in suppressing them!
Point.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Human Evolution Demonstrated Yet Again |
02 Oct 2006 07:58:42 PM |
|
|
stoney wrote:
On 30 Sep 2006 05:00:24 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net>
wrote in alt.atheism
http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2006/09/fun_with_homini.html#more
charts cranial capacity against time for adult hominins and shows that
there are no unbridgeable gaps in the fossil record. It's a steady
curve upwards over 3.5 million years.
Cretinists aren't interested in facts.
You mean 'Creationists' -
Who told you that the Creation Scientists aren't interested in facts?
The 'Lucy Child'
http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/4654
Did Lucy walk upright?
http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1823
<snip>
Gladys Swager
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Human Evolution Demonstrated Yet Again |
07 Oct 2006 09:07:10 PM |
|
|
On 2 Oct 2006 17:58:42 -0700, wrote:
- Refer: <1159837122.852133.67290@c28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
stoney wrote:
On 30 Sep 2006 05:00:24 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net>
wrote in alt.atheism
http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2006/09/fun_with_homini.html#more
charts cranial capacity against time for adult hominins and shows that
there are no unbridgeable gaps in the fossil record. It's a steady
curve upwards over 3.5 million years.
Cretinists aren't interested in facts.
You mean 'Creationists' -
Who told you that the Creation Scientists aren't interested in facts?
The 'Lucy Child'
http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/4654
Did Lucy walk upright?
http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1823
<snip>
Gladys Swager
Oh dear.
The ignoramus is back...
Set your kill-filters to "stun".
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Human Evolution Demonstrated Yet Again |
02 Oct 2006 08:03:03 PM |
|
|
On 2 Oct 2006 17:58:42 -0700, wrote:
stoney wrote:
On 30 Sep 2006 05:00:24 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net>
wrote in alt.atheism
http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2006/09/fun_with_homini.html#more
charts cranial capacity against time for adult hominins and shows that
there are no unbridgeable gaps in the fossil record. It's a steady
curve upwards over 3.5 million years.
Cretinists aren't interested in facts.
You mean 'Creationists' -
Who told you that the Creation Scientists aren't interested in facts?
Observation of creationists lying through their teeth, like the
dishonest ***** you cite.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: Human Evolution Demonstrated Yet Again |
02 Oct 2006 08:16:46 PM |
|
|
On 2 Oct 2006 17:58:42 -0700, in alt.atheism
swager@ozemail.com.au wrote in
<1159837122.852133.67290@c28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>:
stoney wrote:
On 30 Sep 2006 05:00:24 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net>
wrote in alt.atheism
http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2006/09/fun_with_homini.html#more
charts cranial capacity against time for adult hominins and shows that
there are no unbridgeable gaps in the fossil record. It's a steady
curve upwards over 3.5 million years.
Cretinists aren't interested in facts.
You mean 'Creationists' -
Who told you that the Creation Scientists aren't interested in facts?
The Creation Scientists, because they have made it clear that they will
ignore every single fact that does not fit their religious doctrine.
The 'Lucy Child'
http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/4654
Carl Wieland has a demonstrated willingness to lie about anything
related to science. No Christian should ever repeat any of his claims.
The Christian will almost certainly be bearing false witness.
Did Lucy walk upright?
http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1823
Why bother. They tell you that they will lie about any science that does
not fit with their religious doctrines:
<http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/43/>
<snip>
Gladys Swager
Don't be suckered in by liars who claim to be teaching the word of God.
Creation Science mocks God.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Lies? Whose lies? |
03 Oct 2006 10:45:52 PM |
|
|
Free Lunch wrote:
On 2 Oct 2006 17:58:42 -0700, in alt.atheism
swager@ozemail.com.au wrote in
<1159837122.852133.67290@c28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>:
<snip>
Cretinists aren't interested in facts.
You mean 'Creationists' -
Who told you that the Creation Scientists aren't interested in facts?
The Creation Scientists, because they have made it clear that they will
ignore every single fact that does not fit their religious doctrine.
The 'Lucy Child'
http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/4654
Carl Wieland has a demonstrated willingness to lie about anything
related to science. No Christian should ever repeat any of his claims.
The Christian will almost certainly be bearing false witness.
Did Lucy walk upright?
http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1823
Why bother. They tell you that they will lie about any science that does
not fit with their religious doctrines:
<http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/43/>
What you are really saying is that if a Creaion Scientist
disagrees, from his/her research and studies
with some information given by Evolutionary scientists
then that Creation Scientist is lying.
<snip>
Don't be suckered in by liars who claim to be teaching the word of God.
Creation Science mocks God.
Tell me how do you think that Creation Scientists are mocking God
when they are endeavouring to find the SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE
that evolution by chance random processes did/could not happen?
They are looking at the same scientific evidence
as the Evolutionary Scientists - ie. peer reviewing their work.-
and, in some instances, are coming to different conclusion.
OR
is that as you have accepted evolution as it was indoctrinated
in your school &/or Tertiary training,
without any evidence to the contrary,
and you do not want hear/read the evidence to the contrary
that the Creationists are giving
Gladys Swager.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: Lies? Whose lies? |
03 Oct 2006 11:05:27 PM |
|
|
On 3 Oct 2006 20:45:52 -0700, in alt.atheism
swager@ozemail.com.au wrote in
<1159933552.754667.167080@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>:
Free Lunch wrote:
On 2 Oct 2006 17:58:42 -0700, in alt.atheism
swager@ozemail.com.au wrote in
<1159837122.852133.67290@c28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>:
<snip>
Cretinists aren't interested in facts.
You mean 'Creationists' -
Who told you that the Creation Scientists aren't interested in facts?
The Creation Scientists, because they have made it clear that they will
ignore every single fact that does not fit their religious doctrine.
The 'Lucy Child'
http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/4654
Carl Wieland has a demonstrated willingness to lie about anything
related to science. No Christian should ever repeat any of his claims.
The Christian will almost certainly be bearing false witness.
Did Lucy walk upright?
http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1823
Why bother. They tell you that they will lie about any science that does
not fit with their religious doctrines:
<http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/43/>
What you are really saying is that if a Creaion Scientist
disagrees, from his/her research and studies
with some information given by Evolutionary scientists
then that Creation Scientist is lying.
If a Creation Scientists does research and learns about science, that
person will no longer be selling the lies of Creation Science. There are
no Creation Scientists who are doing research and studies about
evolution. They have doctrines that forbid it. The lies come from their
religious beliefs not from scientific study.
<snip>
Don't be suckered in by liars who claim to be teaching the word of God.
Creation Science mocks God.
Tell me how do you think that Creation Scientists are mocking God
when they are endeavouring to find the SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE
that evolution by chance random processes did/could not happen?
They are not looking for any scientific evidence. The scientific
evidence has already shown that their doctrines are false. They are
mocking God by lying about the scientific evidence.
They are looking at the same scientific evidence
as the Evolutionary Scientists - ie. peer reviewing their work.-
and, in some instances, are coming to different conclusion.
No, they don't care about science at all and they never do any peer
review. They commit themselves to religious doctrines and test what they
write by their religious doctrines. They refuse to consider the idea
that the religious doctrines that they preach are false.
OR
is that as you have accepted evolution as it was indoctrinated
in your school &/or Tertiary training,
without any evidence to the contrary,
and you do not want hear/read the evidence to the contrary
that the Creationists are giving
I grew up in a very religious environment where Young Earth Creationism
was implicit in the teachings. It is clear to anyone who is not
committed to a religious doctrine that the theory of evolution by
variation and natural selection is the only one that fits the evidence
that has been collected. Creationists are just telling lies to fit their
preconceived religious notions.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Human Evolution Demonstrated Yet Again |
30 Sep 2006 08:02:16 AM |
|
|
On 30 Sep 2006 05:00:24 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net>
wrote:
- Refer: <1159617624.285853.234960@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2006/09/fun_with_homini.html#more
charts cranial capacity against time for adult hominins and shows that
there are no unbridgeable gaps in the fossil record. It's a steady
curve upwards over 3.5 million years.
Only if one discounts the downward trend amongst theists.
Especially the poor brain-dead Jehovah's Witlesses, where it has
extended into the negative capacity, (in a particularly alarming
manner).
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Human Evolution Demonstrated Yet Again |
30 Sep 2006 10:18:50 AM |
|
|
Michael Gray wrote:
On 30 Sep 2006 05:00:24 -0700, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net>
wrote:
- Refer: <1159617624.285853.234960@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2006/09/fun_with_homini.html#more
charts cranial capacity against time for adult hominins and shows that
there are no unbridgeable gaps in the fossil record. It's a steady
curve upwards over 3.5 million years.
Only if one discounts the downward trend amongst theists.
Especially the poor brain-dead Jehovah's Witlesses, where it has
extended into the negative capacity, (in a particularly alarming
manner).
You're right! I oughta contact the guy who posted this at Panda's
Thumb and ask if he adjusted for that...!
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
Honestly. I miss the crew, the true team members, Lucy, Katie, Tina, Helen, Niki, Artie, Hugh, Bob, Harlow, Davis, Carl, and the many others too many to lits.
OT: Lucy Hughes-Hallett
Lucy's Baby: Pre-human fossil Dazzles Scientists
We are kicking Lucy out of the family tree
To AKA Lucy
The New Face of Evolution, Lucy moves over for Selam
And lead us not into Piltdown,but deliver us from Lucy Amen
Honestly. I miss the crew, the true team members, Lucy, Katie, Tina, Helen, Niki, Artie, Hugh, Bob, Harlow, Davis, Carl, and the many others too many to lits.
| Honestly. I miss the crew, the true team members, Lucy, Katie, Tina, Helen, Niki, Artie, Hugh, Bob, Harlow, Davis, Carl, and the many others too many to lits.
TOBS: Was Lucy the split image of the Piltdownman?
OT: Ethiopia to shift a million people from drought-hit areas
Axum, Ethiopia - Home of the Ark of the Covenant
Evil Bible Quote of the Day for Aug 17 (God Will Kill Ethiopia)
Acid attack on woman shocks Ethiopia
OT: Obelisk looted by Mussolini begins journey to Ethiopia
|
|
|
