MANY BODY PARTS ARE VALUABLE COMMERCIAL ITEMS...



 Religions > Atheism > MANY BODY PARTS ARE VALUABLE COMMERCIAL ITEMS...

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Gods Creator! TEXT & HTML"
Date: 20 Oct 2006 02:50:16 AM
Object: MANY BODY PARTS ARE VALUABLE COMMERCIAL ITEMS...
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------020209020601000301040500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thus Spake: *G* *O* *D* *S* *C* *R* *E* *A* *T* *O* *R*
"US UNDERTAKERS ADMIT CORPSE SCAM"
Undertakers in the New York area have admitted being part of a scheme to
steal body parts for transplants.
The criminal operation saw body parts removed from corpses without the
consent of relatives and sold to biomedical companies.
The body of veteran BBC broadcaster Alistair Cooke was among those used.
Brooklyn district attorney Charles Hynes said that hundreds of parts
were sold
for millions of dollars, and that more people were likely to be charged.
---> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6064692.stm
*This may be a Billion dollar market for a different type of
Cannibalism*
God's Creator!
(I don't forgive *****!) 8-)
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Todays U.S. Holy Wars News:
http://www.antiwar.com
http://icasualties.org/oif/
--------------020209020601000301040500
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<div align="center"><font color="#993399"><big><b>Thus Spake:&nbsp; *G* *O*
*D* *S*&nbsp;&nbsp; *C* *R* *E* *A* *T* *O* *R*</b></big></font><br>
</div>
<br>
<div align="center">
<div align="left"><br>
</div>
<div align="center"><big><big><b>"US UNDERTAKERS ADMIT CORPSE SCAM"<br>
<br>
</b></big></big></div>
</div>
<br>
&nbsp;Undertakers in the New York area have admitted being part of a scheme
to<br>
&nbsp;steal body parts for transplants.<br>
<br>
The criminal operation saw body parts removed from corpses without the <br>
consent of relatives and sold to biomedical companies.<br>
<br>
The body of veteran BBC broadcaster Alistair Cooke was among those used.<br>
<br>
Brooklyn district attorney Charles Hynes said that hundreds of parts
were sold <br>
for millions of dollars, and that more people were likely to be charged.<br>
<font color="#3333ff"><big><b>---&gt;&nbsp;
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6064692.stm">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6064692.stm</a><br>
</b></big></font><br>
<div align="center">&nbsp;<i><big><b>*This may be a Billion dollar&nbsp; market
for a different type of&nbsp; Cannibalism* </b></big></i><br>
</div>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<div align="center"><b><font color="#993399"><big><big>God's Creator!&nbsp; </big></big></font></b><br>
(<font color="#cc0000"><b><i><big>I don't forgive *****!</big></i></b></font>)
<span class="moz-smiley-s11"><span> 8-) </span></span><br>
</div>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="77">--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<font color="#3333ff"><big><b> Todays <font color="#cc0000">U.S. Holy Wars</font> News:</b></big></font>
<font color="#330033"><big><b><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.antiwar.com">http://www.antiwar.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://icasualties.org/oif/">http://icasualties.org/oif/</a></b></big></font>
</pre>
</body>
</html>
--------------020209020601000301040500--
.

User: "torresD"

Title: GOP=Sexual Perverts 20 Oct 2006 02:59:01 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_Coverup_Scandal
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_A._Bonacci
video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggxiBWv4xYE
video
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4946110250157218995
Site on which video was found.
http://www.democraticwarrior.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4153
.
User: "Jim Higgins"

Title: Re: GOP=Sexual Perverts 20 Oct 2006 07:10:28 AM
"torresD" <torresd30@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9l%Zg.16259$UG4.11760@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_Coverup_Scandal

<snip>
You really are a monomaniacal fool. Of course Teddy "Chappaquiddick"
Kennedy is as pure as the driven snow. You do not have a grip on reality, I
pity you.
.
User: "torresD"

Title: Re: GOP=Sexual Perverts 20 Oct 2006 02:50:37 PM
"Jim Higgins"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_Coverup_Scandal

You really are a monomaniacal fool. Of course Teddy "Chappaquiddick"
Kennedy is as pure as the driven snow. You do not have a grip on reality,
I pity you.

I'm not saying that.
I'm saying that, according to this video,
killed by The Discovery Channel,
and
The Washington Times Headline -
Homosexual Prostitution Inquiry, Ensnares VIP's with Bush & Reagan,
apparently The Washington Times had the goods, because the sordid
hobby of the GOP made their headline, the Republicans in the Bush/Reagan
administration were raping boys from an orphanage, namely Boys Town in
Nebraska.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4946110250157218995
.

User: "•R L Measures"

Title: Re: GOP=Sexual Perverts 20 Oct 2006 08:48:47 AM
In article <12jhf5ij2va3n89@corp.supernews.com>, "Jim Higgins"
<gordian238@hotmail.com> wrote:

"torresD" <torresd30@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9l%Zg.16259$UG4.11760@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_Coverup_Scandal


<snip>

You really are a monomaniacal fool. Of course Teddy "Chappaquiddick"
Kennedy is as pure as the driven snow. You do not have a grip on reality, I
pity you.

But when Teddy drinks he's not all that steady.
.
User: "CB"

Title: Re: GOP=Sexual Perverts 22 Oct 2006 08:40:28 PM
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 06:48:47 -0700,
(•R L Measures) wrote:

In article <12jhf5ij2va3n89@corp.supernews.com>, "Jim Higgins"
<gordian238@hotmail.com> wrote:

"torresD" <torresd30@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9l%Zg.16259$UG4.11760@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_Coverup_Scandal


<snip>

You really are a monomaniacal fool. Of course Teddy "Chappaquiddick"
Kennedy is as pure as the driven snow. You do not have a grip on reality, I
pity you.


But when Teddy drinks he's not all that steady.

IOW, he drinks all the time?
Acts 26:8 "Why is it considered incredible among you
people if God does raise the dead?

.
User: "•R L Measures"

Title: Re: GOP=Sexual Perverts 23 Oct 2006 12:50:54 AM
In article <da7oj25th8cr0dqj19opevv84jd04uunu6@4ax.com>, CB
<country2000@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 06:48:47 -0700,

(•R L Measures) wrote:

In article <12jhf5ij2va3n89@corp.supernews.com>, "Jim Higgins"
<gordian238@hotmail.com> wrote:

"torresD" <torresd30@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9l%Zg.16259$UG4.11760@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_Coverup_Scandal


<snip>

You really are a monomaniacal fool. Of course Teddy "Chappaquiddick"
Kennedy is as pure as the driven snow. You do not have a grip on

reality, I

pity you.


But when Teddy drinks he's not all that steady.


IOW, he drinks all the time?

• Nobody can drink when they are asleep.
.




User: "•R L Measures"

Title: Re: GOP=Sexual Perverts 20 Oct 2006 07:05:02 AM
In article <9l%Zg.16259$UG4.11760@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
"torresD" <torresd30@hotmail.com> wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_Coverup_Scandal

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_A._Bonacci

video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggxiBWv4xYE

video
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4946110250157218995


Site on which video was found.
http://www.democraticwarrior.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4153

** To those men who prefer boy-bottoms, men who prefer girl bottoms are
perverts. Perhaps this is why Republicans went cookoo over the Monica /
Bill Clinton affair?
.
User: "torresD"

Title: Re: GOP=Sexual Perverts 20 Oct 2006 02:42:32 PM
".R L Measures" <r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:r-2010060505020001@192.168.1.102...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_Coverup_Scandal

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_A._Bonacci

video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggxiBWv4xYE

video
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4946110250157218995


Site on which video was found.
http://www.democraticwarrior.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4153


** To those men who prefer boy-bottoms, men who prefer girl bottoms are
perverts. Perhaps this is why Republicans went cookoo over the Monica /
Bill Clinton affair?

Not the same thing, comparing apples and oranges.
This video, indicated below, that begins
with the Washington Times headline,
Homosexual Prostitution Inquiry, Ensnares VIP's with Bush & Reagan
demonstrates that while Clinton, was involved with a person over 21 years of
age, the Reagan/Bush VIP's and their rich friends, were picking on children,
some as young as 8 years of age.
Reagan/Bush VIP's were having kids brought to them from Boys Town, in
Nebraska for anal rape, because that is what you call it when it involves
kids between the ages of 8-13 - rape.
And these were kids that were vulnerable, had no parents,
and the state was their legal Guardian, they were residents of an
orphanage.
Boys Town is today, and was then, an orphanage for boys.
Clinton was not a child sexual predator and he wasn't having
kids brought to him for sex parties, as the GOP and their cronies were.
Why the GOP even had the kids taking tours of the White House,
during the Bush I administration, according to their sworn testimony.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4946110250157218995
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4946110250157218995
.

User: "Charlie Wolf"

Title: Re: Democrats =Sexual Perverts 20 Oct 2006 08:49:30 AM
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 05:05:02 -0700,
(•R L Measures) wrote:

In article <9l%Zg.16259$UG4.11760@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
"torresD" <torresd30@hotmail.com> wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_Coverup_Scandal

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_A._Bonacci

video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggxiBWv4xYE

video
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4946110250157218995


Site on which video was found.
http://www.democraticwarrior.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4153


** To those men who prefer boy-bottoms, men who prefer girl bottoms are
perverts. Perhaps this is why Republicans went cookoo over the Monica /
Bill Clinton affair?

Gerry Studds.
Regards,
.
User: "torresD"

Title: Re: GOP=Sexual Perverts 20 Oct 2006 02:44:58 PM
"Charlie Wolf" <charlie_wolf@noemail.com> wrote in message
news:nukhj2liqfg2eum5brpleclsih1t4r1crm@4ax.com...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_Coverup_Scandal
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_A._Bonacci
video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggxiBWv4xYE
video
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4946110250157218995
Site on which video was found.
http://www.democraticwarrior.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4153

** To those men who prefer boy-bottoms, men who prefer girl bottoms are
perverts. Perhaps this is why Republicans went cookoo over the Monica /
Bill Clinton affair?

Gerry Studds.
Regards,

Was Gerry Studds having kids in Boys Town, boys and girls,
being brought to him for sex parties?
The GOP VIP's in the Bush/Reagan Administration were doing just that.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4946110250157218995
.

User: "Midwinter"

Title: Re: Democrats =Sexual Perverts 20 Oct 2006 09:01:05 AM
What a truly *stunning* riposte. Someone posts a message under the asinine
title of 'GOP = Sexual Perverts'; and just when you think it can't get any
more Noel Coward, along comes razor wit here with "Democrats = Sexual
Perverts".
Staggering stuff, really. Takes the breath away, so it does.
.
User: "torresD"

Title: Re: Democrats =Sexual Perverts 20 Oct 2006 02:46:15 PM
"Midwinter" <midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:Xns986298DB8714FCYPMNDEXHBCJOIU@216.196.109.145...

What a truly *stunning* riposte. Someone posts a message under the
asinine
title of 'GOP = Sexual Perverts'; and just when you think it can't get any
more Noel Coward, along comes razor wit here with "Democrats = Sexual
Perverts".

Staggering stuff, really. Takes the breath away, so it does.

Yes, John DeCamp's brave efforts to get justice
for the GOP sexually abused boys in Boys Town, Nebraska,
does take anyone's breath away.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4946110250157218995
.
User: "CB"

Title: Re: Democrats =Sexual Perverts 22 Oct 2006 08:58:38 PM
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:46:15 GMT, "torresD" <torresd30@hotmail.com> wrote:


"Midwinter" <midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:Xns986298DB8714FCYPMNDEXHBCJOIU@216.196.109.145...

What a truly *stunning* riposte. Someone posts a message under the
asinine
title of 'GOP = Sexual Perverts'; and just when you think it can't get any
more Noel Coward, along comes razor wit here with "Democrats = Sexual
Perverts".

Staggering stuff, really. Takes the breath away, so it does.


Yes, John DeCamp's brave efforts to get justice
for the GOP sexually abused boys in Boys Town, Nebraska,
does take anyone's breath away.

Are you jealous of Monica?
Acts 26:8 "Why is it considered incredible among you
people if God does raise the dead?

.


User: "stewart_connor"

Title: GOP=Sexual Perverts 20 Oct 2006 09:13:23 AM
Midwinter wrote:

What a truly *stunning* riposte. Someone posts a message under the asinine
title of 'GOP = Sexual Perverts'; and just when you think it can't get any
more Noel Coward, along comes razor wit here with "Democrats = Sexual
Perverts".

Staggering stuff, really. Takes the breath away, so it does.

So you decide to repeat it rather than make a reference to Foley.
Which is worth Clinto getting a BJ from a 23 year old groupie, or
pedophile Foley and the GOP coverup of same?
.
User: "Midwinter"

Title: Re: GOP=Sexual Perverts 20 Oct 2006 10:44:01 AM
"stewart_connor" <stewartconnor@hotmail.com> wrote:

So you decide to repeat it rather than make a reference to Foley.

Looks like it, doesn't it?

Which is worth Clinto getting a BJ from a 23 year old groupie, or
pedophile Foley and the GOP coverup of same?

Was 'worth' supposed to be 'worse', there? If so, then I think you missed
the point of the comment.
.

User: "Christopher A. Lee"

Title: Re: GOP=Sexual Perverts 20 Oct 2006 09:26:28 AM
On 20 Oct 2006 07:13:23 -0700, "stewart_connor"
<stewartconnor@hotmail.com> wrote:

Midwinter wrote:

What a truly *stunning* riposte. Someone posts a message under the asinine
title of 'GOP = Sexual Perverts'; and just when you think it can't get any
more Noel Coward, along comes razor wit here with "Democrats = Sexual
Perverts".

Staggering stuff, really. Takes the breath away, so it does.


So you decide to repeat it rather than make a reference to Foley.
Which is worth Clinto getting a BJ from a 23 year old groupie, or
pedophile Foley and the GOP coverup of same?

It seemed as if she was there to get her Presidential kneepads.
Keeping a semen-stained dress as a trophy was like my college
room-mate who kept the panties of his conquests.
.
User: "torresD"

Title: Re: GOP=Sexual Perverts 20 Oct 2006 02:46:59 PM
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:a2nhj25tjp820tu8217736v9r0mc0cb88c@4ax.com...

On 20 Oct 2006 07:13:23 -0700, "stewart_connor"
<stewartconnor@hotmail.com> wrote:

Midwinter wrote:

What a truly *stunning* riposte. Someone posts a message under the
asinine
title of 'GOP = Sexual Perverts'; and just when you think it can't get
any
more Noel Coward, along comes razor wit here with "Democrats = Sexual
Perverts".

Staggering stuff, really. Takes the breath away, so it does.


So you decide to repeat it rather than make a reference to Foley.
Which is worth Clinto getting a BJ from a 23 year old groupie, or
pedophile Foley and the GOP coverup of same?


It seemed as if she was there to get her Presidential kneepads.
Keeping a semen-stained dress as a trophy was like my college
room-mate who kept the panties of his conquests.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4946110250157218995
.



User: "Charlie Wolf"

Title: Re: Democrats =Sexual Perverts 20 Oct 2006 01:27:51 PM
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:01:05 -0500, Midwinter
<midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

What a truly *stunning* riposte. Someone posts a message under the asinine
title of 'GOP = Sexual Perverts'; and just when you think it can't get any
more Noel Coward, along comes razor wit here with "Democrats = Sexual
Perverts".

Staggering stuff, really. Takes the breath away, so it does.

But you don't disagree - do you. Democrats in Congress are sexual
predators who have had homosexual sex with underage Congressional
pages. Live with it.
Gerry Studds.
Regards,
.
User: "Midwinter"

Title: Re: Democrats =Sexual Perverts 20 Oct 2006 04:35:03 PM
Charlie Wolf <charlie_wolf@noemail.com> wrote:

But you don't disagree - do you.

Do I? Or do I not? Let me guess: because I posted my reply to the
*second* post, I'm a rabid Democrat who hates Republicans. Is that it?
Whereas if I'd posted immediately after the *first* post, I'd be a rabid
Republican who hates Democrats. That's usually how it works when American
politics is involved, isn't it?
Actually, I'm British; I don't have any investment in the Republican or
Democrat parties; I wouldn't generally trust a politician as far as I could
kick one, on either side of the Atlantic; and a criminal is a criminal
whatever podium he's standing on. But as far as the posts (which were and
are my only interest in this thread) are concerned, my opinion remains: an
argument based on "you are; no, YOU are" is still cheap playground stuff.
.
User: "CB"

Title: Re: Democrats =Sexual Perverts 22 Oct 2006 08:57:51 PM
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:35:03 -0500, Midwinter <midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk>
wrote:

Charlie Wolf <charlie_wolf@noemail.com> wrote:

But you don't disagree - do you.


Do I? Or do I not? Let me guess: because I posted my reply to the
*second* post, I'm a rabid Democrat who hates Republicans. Is that it?
Whereas if I'd posted immediately after the *first* post, I'd be a rabid
Republican who hates Democrats. That's usually how it works when American
politics is involved, isn't it?

Actually, I'm British; I don't have any investment in the Republican or
Democrat parties;

Do you hate Bush?
Not an accusation, just curious.
Acts 26:8 "Why is it considered incredible among you
people if God does raise the dead?

.
User: "Midwinter"

Title: Re: Democrats =Sexual Perverts 23 Oct 2006 07:41:47 PM
CB <country2000@hotmail.com> wrote:

Do you hate Bush?
Not an accusation, just curious.

I don't trust him or Blair, because I don't think they've performed well in
office, and I think they're both too keen to use religion as a tool in
leadership. In Blair's case, he seems to have become more and more
dishonest as his premiership has progressed, and has recently been quoted
as making strangely messianic speeches. As for Bush, I don't think he's
intelligent enough to run the world's most powerful country; I don't think
he's capable of any measure of objectivity (which, all patriotic fervour
aside, I think is required by anyone who genuinely wants to benefit their
country); and I still don't believe he became president legitimately.
I don't think I hate either of them.
.



User: "Eris"

Title: Re: Democrats =Sexual Perverts 22 Oct 2006 10:02:17 PM
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:27:51 -0500, Charlie Wolf
<charlie_wolf@noemail.com> wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:01:05 -0500, Midwinter
<midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

What a truly *stunning* riposte. Someone posts a message under the asinine
title of 'GOP = Sexual Perverts'; and just when you think it can't get any
more Noel Coward, along comes razor wit here with "Democrats = Sexual
Perverts".

Staggering stuff, really. Takes the breath away, so it does.

But you don't disagree - do you. Democrats in Congress are sexual
predators who have had homosexual sex with underage Congressional
pages. Live with it.
Gerry Studds.
Regards,

An issue you are willing to debate during the current administration?
We Dems prefer females.
.
User: "Charlie Wolf"

Title: Re: Democrats =Sexual Perverts 23 Oct 2006 08:32:32 AM
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 23:02:17 -0400, Eris <vithant@nospamgmail.com>
wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:27:51 -0500, Charlie Wolf
<charlie_wolf@noemail.com> wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:01:05 -0500, Midwinter
<midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

What a truly *stunning* riposte. Someone posts a message under the asinine
title of 'GOP = Sexual Perverts'; and just when you think it can't get any
more Noel Coward, along comes razor wit here with "Democrats = Sexual
Perverts".

Staggering stuff, really. Takes the breath away, so it does.

But you don't disagree - do you. Democrats in Congress are sexual
predators who have had homosexual sex with underage Congressional
pages. Live with it.
Gerry Studds.
Regards,

An issue you are willing to debate during the current administration?
We Dems prefer females.

Excellent post. And how many Democrats lately (including most of the
US Press) is trying to paint ALL Republicans as rabid homosexual child
predators??
Thanks for making my point.
Regards.


.
User: "•R L Measures"

Title: Re: Democrats =Sexual Perverts 23 Oct 2006 09:59:08 AM
In article <tmgpj2lu8jdpn30g7h9nd7bbam0992g1o7@4ax.com>, Charlie Wolf
<charlie_wolf@noemail.com> wrote:

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 23:02:17 -0400, Eris <vithant@nospamgmail.com>
wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:27:51 -0500, Charlie Wolf
<charlie_wolf@noemail.com> wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:01:05 -0500, Midwinter
<midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

What a truly *stunning* riposte. Someone posts a message under the

asinine

title of 'GOP = Sexual Perverts'; and just when you think it can't get any
more Noel Coward, along comes razor wit here with "Democrats = Sexual
Perverts".

Staggering stuff, really. Takes the breath away, so it does.

But you don't disagree - do you. Democrats in Congress are sexual
predators who have had homosexual sex with underage Congressional
pages. Live with it.
Gerry Studds.
Regards,

An issue you are willing to debate during the current administration?
We Dems prefer females.

Excellent post. And how many Democrats lately (including most of the
US Press) is trying to paint ALL Republicans as rabid homosexual child
predators??

Thanks for making my point.
Regards.

• Indeed. Now it's becoming clear why Republicans said Bill Clinton was
a pervert.
.
User: "CB"

Title: Re: Democrats =Sexual Perverts 23 Oct 2006 09:53:42 PM
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 07:59:08 -0700,
(•R L Measures) wrote:

In article <tmgpj2lu8jdpn30g7h9nd7bbam0992g1o7@4ax.com>, Charlie Wolf
<charlie_wolf@noemail.com> wrote:

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 23:02:17 -0400, Eris <vithant@nospamgmail.com>
wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:27:51 -0500, Charlie Wolf
<charlie_wolf@noemail.com> wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:01:05 -0500, Midwinter
<midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

What a truly *stunning* riposte. Someone posts a message under the

asinine

title of 'GOP = Sexual Perverts'; and just when you think it can't get any
more Noel Coward, along comes razor wit here with "Democrats = Sexual
Perverts".

Staggering stuff, really. Takes the breath away, so it does.

But you don't disagree - do you. Democrats in Congress are sexual
predators who have had homosexual sex with underage Congressional
pages. Live with it.
Gerry Studds.
Regards,

An issue you are willing to debate during the current administration?
We Dems prefer females.

Excellent post. And how many Democrats lately (including most of the
US Press) is trying to paint ALL Republicans as rabid homosexual child
predators??

Thanks for making my point.
Regards.

• Indeed. Now it's becoming clear why Republicans said Bill Clinton was
a pervert.

I don't think clinton is a pervert.
He's just a moron that uses other people for his own benefit.
getting a bj in the Oval Office certainly did not benefit the country.
It is interesting that when a Republican exposes himself as a sexual predator
he resigns but a democrat is praised.
Double standard? You bet.
Acts 26:8 "Why is it considered incredible among you
people if God does raise the dead?

.
User: "•R L Measures"

Title: Re: Democrats =Sexual Perverts 24 Oct 2006 03:49:41 AM
In article <bpvqj2hcgk3id4m9nldj86qg8pfdq1j9vb@4ax.com>, CB
<country2000@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 07:59:08 -0700,

(•R L Measures) wrote:

In article <tmgpj2lu8jdpn30g7h9nd7bbam0992g1o7@4ax.com>, Charlie Wolf
<charlie_wolf@noemail.com> wrote:

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 23:02:17 -0400, Eris <vithant@nospamgmail.com>
wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:27:51 -0500, Charlie Wolf
<charlie_wolf@noemail.com> wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:01:05 -0500, Midwinter
<midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

What a truly *stunning* riposte. Someone posts a message under the

asinine

title of 'GOP = Sexual Perverts'; and just when you think it can't

get any

more Noel Coward, along comes razor wit here with "Democrats = Sexual
Perverts".

Staggering stuff, really. Takes the breath away, so it does.

But you don't disagree - do you. Democrats in Congress are sexual
predators who have had homosexual sex with underage Congressional
pages. Live with it.
Gerry Studds.
Regards,

An issue you are willing to debate during the current administration?
We Dems prefer females.

Excellent post. And how many Democrats lately (including most of the
US Press) is trying to paint ALL Republicans as rabid homosexual child
predators??

Thanks for making my point.
Regards.

• Indeed. Now it's becoming clear why Republicans said Bill Clinton was
a pervert.


I don't think clinton is a pervert.
He's just a moron that uses other people for his own benefit.

• Did he really benefit from Monica's knob job?

getting a bj in the Oval Office certainly did not benefit the country.
It is interesting that when a Republican exposes himself as a sexual predator
he resigns but a democrat is praised.
Double standard? You bet.

• Not in West Hollywood.
.
User: "CB"

Title: Re: Democrats =Sexual Perverts 25 Oct 2006 10:02:45 PM
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 01:49:41 -0700,
(•R L Measures) wrote:

In article <bpvqj2hcgk3id4m9nldj86qg8pfdq1j9vb@4ax.com>, CB
<country2000@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 07:59:08 -0700,

(•R L Measures) wrote:

In article <tmgpj2lu8jdpn30g7h9nd7bbam0992g1o7@4ax.com>, Charlie Wolf
<charlie_wolf@noemail.com> wrote:

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 23:02:17 -0400, Eris <vithant@nospamgmail.com>
wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:27:51 -0500, Charlie Wolf
<charlie_wolf@noemail.com> wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:01:05 -0500, Midwinter
<midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

What a truly *stunning* riposte. Someone posts a message under the

asinine

title of 'GOP = Sexual Perverts'; and just when you think it can't

get any

more Noel Coward, along comes razor wit here with "Democrats = Sexual
Perverts".

Staggering stuff, really. Takes the breath away, so it does.

But you don't disagree - do you. Democrats in Congress are sexual
predators who have had homosexual sex with underage Congressional
pages. Live with it.
Gerry Studds.
Regards,

An issue you are willing to debate during the current administration?
We Dems prefer females.

Excellent post. And how many Democrats lately (including most of the
US Press) is trying to paint ALL Republicans as rabid homosexual child
predators??

Thanks for making my point.
Regards.

• Indeed. Now it's becoming clear why Republicans said Bill Clinton was
a pervert.


I don't think clinton is a pervert.
He's just a moron that uses other people for his own benefit.


• Did he really benefit from Monica's knob job?

He got caught.
His benefit at the time was maybe he didn't have to rely on hillary for sex. \
Can't say that I blame him.


getting a bj in the Oval Office certainly did not benefit the country.
It is interesting that when a Republican exposes himself as a sexual predator
he resigns but a democrat is praised.
Double standard? You bet.


• Not in West Hollywood.

There is no standard in Hollywood.
Acts 26:8 "Why is it considered incredible among you
people if God does raise the dead?

.
User: "•R L Measures"

Title: Re: Democrats =Sexual Perverts 26 Oct 2006 02:52:53 AM
In article <b490k2ptprjmaea94fit0vp5gv3kkuq8so@4ax.com>, CB
<country2000@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 01:49:41 -0700,

(•R L Measures) wrote:

In article <bpvqj2hcgk3id4m9nldj86qg8pfdq1j9vb@4ax.com>, CB
<country2000@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 07:59:08 -0700,

(•R L Measures) wrote:

In article <tmgpj2lu8jdpn30g7h9nd7bbam0992g1o7@4ax.com>, Charlie Wolf
<charlie_wolf@noemail.com> wrote:

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 23:02:17 -0400, Eris <vithant@nospamgmail.com>
wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:27:51 -0500, Charlie Wolf
<charlie_wolf@noemail.com> wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:01:05 -0500, Midwinter
<midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

What a truly *stunning* riposte. Someone posts a message under the

asinine

title of 'GOP = Sexual Perverts'; and just when you think it can't

get any

more Noel Coward, along comes razor wit here with "Democrats =

Sexual

Perverts".

Staggering stuff, really. Takes the breath away, so it does.

But you don't disagree - do you. Democrats in Congress are sexual
predators who have had homosexual sex with underage Congressional
pages. Live with it.
Gerry Studds.
Regards,

An issue you are willing to debate during the current administration?
We Dems prefer females.

Excellent post. And how many Democrats lately (including most of the
US Press) is trying to paint ALL Republicans as rabid homosexual child
predators??

Thanks for making my point.
Regards.

• Indeed. Now it's becoming clear why Republicans said Bill Clinton was
a pervert.


I don't think clinton is a pervert.
He's just a moron that uses other people for his own benefit.


• Did he really benefit from Monica's knob job?


He got caught.
His benefit at the time was maybe he didn't have to rely on hillary for sex. \
Can't say that I blame him.

• In the dark, I doubt if a man could tell the difference.


getting a bj in the Oval Office certainly did not benefit the country.
It is interesting that when a Republican exposes himself as a sexual

predator

he resigns but a democrat is praised.
Double standard? You bet.


• Not in West Hollywood.


There is no standard in Hollywood.

• West Hollywood is not Hollywood.
.
User: "CB"

Title: Re: Democrats =Sexual Perverts 26 Oct 2006 08:29:18 PM
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 00:52:53 -0700,
(•R L Measures) wrote:

In article <b490k2ptprjmaea94fit0vp5gv3kkuq8so@4ax.com>, CB
<country2000@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 01:49:41 -0700,

(•R L Measures) wrote:

In article <bpvqj2hcgk3id4m9nldj86qg8pfdq1j9vb@4ax.com>, CB
<country2000@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 07:59:08 -0700,

(•R L Measures) wrote:

In article <tmgpj2lu8jdpn30g7h9nd7bbam0992g1o7@4ax.com>, Charlie Wolf
<charlie_wolf@noemail.com> wrote:

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 23:02:17 -0400, Eris <vithant@nospamgmail.com>
wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:27:51 -0500, Charlie Wolf
<charlie_wolf@noemail.com> wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:01:05 -0500, Midwinter
<midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

What a truly *stunning* riposte. Someone posts a message under the

asinine

title of 'GOP = Sexual Perverts'; and just when you think it can't

get any

more Noel Coward, along comes razor wit here with "Democrats =

Sexual

Perverts".

Staggering stuff, really. Takes the breath away, so it does.

But you don't disagree - do you. Democrats in Congress are sexual
predators who have had homosexual sex with underage Congressional
pages. Live with it.
Gerry Studds.
Regards,

An issue you are willing to debate during the current administration?
We Dems prefer females.

Excellent post. And how many Democrats lately (including most of the
US Press) is trying to paint ALL Republicans as rabid homosexual child
predators??

Thanks for making my point.
Regards.

• Indeed. Now it's becoming clear why Republicans said Bill Clinton was
a pervert.


I don't think clinton is a pervert.
He's just a moron that uses other people for his own benefit.


• Did he really benefit from Monica's knob job?


He got caught.
His benefit at the time was maybe he didn't have to rely on hillary for sex. \
Can't say that I blame him.


• In the dark, I doubt if a man could tell the difference.

Where hillary is concerned, I don't want to find out.


getting a bj in the Oval Office certainly did not benefit the country.
It is interesting that when a Republican exposes himself as a sexual

predator

he resigns but a democrat is praised.
Double standard? You bet.


• Not in West Hollywood.


There is no standard in Hollywood.

• West Hollywood is not Hollywood.

OK
Acts 26:8 "Why is it considered incredible among you
people if God does raise the dead?

.
User: "•R L Measures"

Title: Re: Democrats =Sexual Perverts 27 Oct 2006 09:43:06 PM
In article <16o2k29g608ubm9pf7hi1641i571miccq1@4ax.com>, CB
<country2000@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 00:52:53 -0700,

(•R L Measures) wrote:

In article <b490k2ptprjmaea94fit0vp5gv3kkuq8so@4ax.com>, CB
<country2000@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 01:49:41 -0700,

(•R L Measures) wrote:

In article <bpvqj2hcgk3id4m9nldj86qg8pfdq1j9vb@4ax.com>, CB
<country2000@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 07:59:08 -0700,

(•R L Measures) wrote:

In article <tmgpj2lu8jdpn30g7h9nd7bbam0992g1o7@4ax.com>, Charlie Wolf
<charlie_wolf@noemail.com> wrote:

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 23:02:17 -0400, Eris <vithant@nospamgmail.com>
wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:27:51 -0500, Charlie Wolf
<charlie_wolf@noemail.com> wrote:

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:01:05 -0500, Midwinter
<midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

What a truly *stunning* riposte. Someone posts a message

under the

asinine

title of 'GOP = Sexual Perverts'; and just when you think it can't

get any

more Noel Coward, along comes razor wit here with "Democrats =

Sexual

Perverts".

Staggering stuff, really. Takes the breath away, so it does.

But you don't disagree - do you. Democrats in Congress are sexual
predators who have had homosexual sex with underage Congressional
pages. Live with it.
Gerry Studds.
Regards,

An issue you are willing to debate during the current

administration?

We Dems prefer females.

Excellent post. And how many Democrats lately (including most of the
US Press) is trying to paint ALL Republicans as rabid

homosexual child

predators??

Thanks for making my point.
Regards.

• Indeed. Now it's becoming clear why Republicans said Bill

Clinton was

a pervert.


I don't think clinton is a pervert.
He's just a moron that uses other people for his own benefit.


• Did he really benefit from Monica's knob job?


He got caught.
His benefit at the time was maybe he didn't have to rely on hillary

for sex. \

Can't say that I blame him.


• In the dark, I doubt if a man could tell the difference.


Where hillary is concerned, I don't want to find out.

• When she was younger and lighter her posterior looked pretty good to me.
.















  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER