many e-mails from Cheney's office at the time of the Plame leak in 2003 have been deleted contrary to White House policy



 Religions > Atheism > many e-mails from Cheney's office at the time of the Plame leak in 2003 have been deleted contrary to White House policy

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "stoney"
Date: 01 Feb 2006 10:43:11 PM
Object: many e-mails from Cheney's office at the time of the Plame leak in 2003 have been deleted contrary to White House policy
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/007576.php
(February 01, 2006 -- 01:20 PM EDT)
One of our readers found this in a brief New York Daily News update on
the status of the Scooter Libby prosecution. The meat of the article is
about Libby's effort to get prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald to fork over
White House documents he got copies of during the investigation.
But down there in the last graf there's this ...
Fitzgerald, who is fighting Libby's request, said in a letter to
Libby's lawyers that many e-mails from Cheney's office at the time of
the Plame leak in 2003 have been deleted contrary to White House policy.
Does that seem a bit odd?
Fitzgerald's letter says that "we have learned that not all email of the
Office of Vice President and the Executive Office of President for
certain time periods in 2003 was preserved through the normal archiving
process on the White House computer system."
Anyone know anything more about this?
/end
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.

User: "johac"

Title: Re: many e-mails from Cheney's office at the time of the Plame leak in 2003 have been deleted contrary to White House policy 02 Feb 2006 01:01:34 AM
In article <gd33u19k06ph2iiqmoi4cjkhtud64375fv@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/007576.php

(February 01, 2006 -- 01:20 PM EDT)

One of our readers found this in a brief New York Daily News update on
the status of the Scooter Libby prosecution. The meat of the article is
about Libby's effort to get prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald to fork over
White House documents he got copies of during the investigation.

But down there in the last graf there's this ...

Fitzgerald, who is fighting Libby's request, said in a letter to
Libby's lawyers that many e-mails from Cheney's office at the time of
the Plame leak in 2003 have been deleted contrary to White House policy.

Does that seem a bit odd?

Fitzgerald's letter says that "we have learned that not all email of the
Office of Vice President and the Executive Office of President for
certain time periods in 2003 was preserved through the normal archiving
process on the White House computer system."

Anyone know anything more about this?

/end

Reminds me of Nixon's '18 minutes'.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
User: "stoney"

Title: Re: many e-mails from Cheney's office at the time of the Plame leak in 2003 have been deleted contrary to White House policy 03 Feb 2006 04:09:11 PM
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 23:01:34 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote in alt.atheism

In article <gd33u19k06ph2iiqmoi4cjkhtud64375fv@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/007576.php

(February 01, 2006 -- 01:20 PM EDT)

One of our readers found this in a brief New York Daily News update on
the status of the Scooter Libby prosecution. The meat of the article is
about Libby's effort to get prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald to fork over
White House documents he got copies of during the investigation.

But down there in the last graf there's this ...

Fitzgerald, who is fighting Libby's request, said in a letter to
Libby's lawyers that many e-mails from Cheney's office at the time of
the Plame leak in 2003 have been deleted contrary to White House policy.

Does that seem a bit odd?

Fitzgerald's letter says that "we have learned that not all email of the
Office of Vice President and the Executive Office of President for
certain time periods in 2003 was preserved through the normal archiving
process on the White House computer system."

Anyone know anything more about this?

/end


Reminds me of Nixon's '18 minutes'.

Yes, it does. But in this case deleted email can be retrieved via NSA
methods.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
User: "johac"

Title: Re: many e-mails from Cheney's office at the time of the Plame leak in 2003 have been deleted contrary to White House policy 04 Feb 2006 02:09:28 AM
In article <5ik7u1h332tqk7i6veske425fim9vq6jri@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:

On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 23:01:34 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote in alt.atheism

In article <gd33u19k06ph2iiqmoi4cjkhtud64375fv@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/007576.php

(February 01, 2006 -- 01:20 PM EDT)

One of our readers found this in a brief New York Daily News update on
the status of the Scooter Libby prosecution. The meat of the article is
about Libby's effort to get prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald to fork over
White House documents he got copies of during the investigation.

But down there in the last graf there's this ...

Fitzgerald, who is fighting Libby's request, said in a letter to
Libby's lawyers that many e-mails from Cheney's office at the time of
the Plame leak in 2003 have been deleted contrary to White House policy.

Does that seem a bit odd?

Fitzgerald's letter says that "we have learned that not all email of the
Office of Vice President and the Executive Office of President for
certain time periods in 2003 was preserved through the normal archiving
process on the White House computer system."

Anyone know anything more about this?

/end


Reminds me of Nixon's '18 minutes'.


Yes, it does. But in this case deleted email can be retrieved via NSA
methods.

Wouldn't it be a hoot if some disgruntled NSA geek dug up some
incriminating info on Cheney and leaked it? `
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
User: "stoney"

Title: Re: many e-mails from Cheney's office at the time of the Plame leak in 2003 have been deleted contrary to White House policy 04 Feb 2006 12:36:00 PM
On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 00:09:28 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote in alt.atheism

In article <5ik7u1h332tqk7i6veske425fim9vq6jri@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:

On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 23:01:34 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote in alt.atheism

In article <gd33u19k06ph2iiqmoi4cjkhtud64375fv@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/007576.php

(February 01, 2006 -- 01:20 PM EDT)

One of our readers found this in a brief New York Daily News update on
the status of the Scooter Libby prosecution. The meat of the article is
about Libby's effort to get prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald to fork over
White House documents he got copies of during the investigation.

But down there in the last graf there's this ...

Fitzgerald, who is fighting Libby's request, said in a letter to
Libby's lawyers that many e-mails from Cheney's office at the time of
the Plame leak in 2003 have been deleted contrary to White House policy.

Does that seem a bit odd?

Fitzgerald's letter says that "we have learned that not all email of the
Office of Vice President and the Executive Office of President for
certain time periods in 2003 was preserved through the normal archiving
process on the White House computer system."

Anyone know anything more about this?

/end


Reminds me of Nixon's '18 minutes'.


Yes, it does. But in this case deleted email can be retrieved via NSA
methods.


Wouldn't it be a hoot if some disgruntled NSA geek dug up some
incriminating info on Cheney and leaked it? `

It wouldn't change anything.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
User: "johac"

Title: Re: many e-mails from Cheney's office at the time of the Plame leak in 2003 have been deleted contrary to White House policy 05 Feb 2006 02:19:45 AM
In article <30t9u117ajfjs9g1t3kcrj5e7aff0en4p7@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:

On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 00:09:28 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote in alt.atheism

In article <5ik7u1h332tqk7i6veske425fim9vq6jri@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:

On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 23:01:34 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote in alt.atheism

In article <gd33u19k06ph2iiqmoi4cjkhtud64375fv@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/007576.php

(February 01, 2006 -- 01:20 PM EDT)

One of our readers found this in a brief New York Daily News update on
the status of the Scooter Libby prosecution. The meat of the article is
about Libby's effort to get prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald to fork over
White House documents he got copies of during the investigation.

But down there in the last graf there's this ...

Fitzgerald, who is fighting Libby's request, said in a letter to
Libby's lawyers that many e-mails from Cheney's office at the time of
the Plame leak in 2003 have been deleted contrary to White House policy.

Does that seem a bit odd?

Fitzgerald's letter says that "we have learned that not all email of the
Office of Vice President and the Executive Office of President for
certain time periods in 2003 was preserved through the normal archiving
process on the White House computer system."

Anyone know anything more about this?

/end


Reminds me of Nixon's '18 minutes'.


Yes, it does. But in this case deleted email can be retrieved via NSA
methods.


Wouldn't it be a hoot if some disgruntled NSA geek dug up some
incriminating info on Cheney and leaked it? `


It wouldn't change anything.

<sighs>
True. The media would ignore it. The Dems would be too chicken to do
anything about it. The NSA geek would find himself in an orange jumpsuit
headed for Gitmo.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
User: "stoney"

Title: Re: many e-mails from Cheney's office at the time of the Plame leak in 2003 have been deleted contrary to White House policy 05 Feb 2006 10:52:58 AM
On Sun, 05 Feb 2006 00:19:45 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote in alt.atheism

In article <30t9u117ajfjs9g1t3kcrj5e7aff0en4p7@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:

On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 00:09:28 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote in alt.atheism

In article <5ik7u1h332tqk7i6veske425fim9vq6jri@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:

On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 23:01:34 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote in alt.atheism

In article <gd33u19k06ph2iiqmoi4cjkhtud64375fv@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/007576.php

(February 01, 2006 -- 01:20 PM EDT)

One of our readers found this in a brief New York Daily News update on
the status of the Scooter Libby prosecution. The meat of the article is
about Libby's effort to get prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald to fork over
White House documents he got copies of during the investigation.

But down there in the last graf there's this ...

Fitzgerald, who is fighting Libby's request, said in a letter to
Libby's lawyers that many e-mails from Cheney's office at the time of
the Plame leak in 2003 have been deleted contrary to White House policy.

Does that seem a bit odd?

Fitzgerald's letter says that "we have learned that not all email of the
Office of Vice President and the Executive Office of President for
certain time periods in 2003 was preserved through the normal archiving
process on the White House computer system."

Anyone know anything more about this?

/end


Reminds me of Nixon's '18 minutes'.


Yes, it does. But in this case deleted email can be retrieved via NSA
methods.


Wouldn't it be a hoot if some disgruntled NSA geek dug up some
incriminating info on Cheney and leaked it? `


It wouldn't change anything.


<sighs>
True. The media would ignore it. The Dems would be too chicken to do
anything about it. The NSA geek would find himself in an orange jumpsuit
headed for Gitmo.

Or tossed out of a helicopter enroute from 8,000 feet.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
User: "johac"

Title: Re: many e-mails from Cheney's office at the time of the Plame leak in 2003 have been deleted contrary to White House policy 05 Feb 2006 11:30:36 PM
In article <8abcu155v68qspofnblfbhuvge3uh7vc4u@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:

On Sun, 05 Feb 2006 00:19:45 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote in alt.atheism

In article <30t9u117ajfjs9g1t3kcrj5e7aff0en4p7@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:

On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 00:09:28 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote in alt.atheism

In article <5ik7u1h332tqk7i6veske425fim9vq6jri@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:

On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 23:01:34 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote in alt.atheism

In article <gd33u19k06ph2iiqmoi4cjkhtud64375fv@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/007576.php

(February 01, 2006 -- 01:20 PM EDT)

One of our readers found this in a brief New York Daily News update
on
the status of the Scooter Libby prosecution. The meat of the article
is
about Libby's effort to get prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald to fork
over
White House documents he got copies of during the investigation.

But down there in the last graf there's this ...

Fitzgerald, who is fighting Libby's request, said in a letter to
Libby's lawyers that many e-mails from Cheney's office at the time
of
the Plame leak in 2003 have been deleted contrary to White House
policy.

Does that seem a bit odd?

Fitzgerald's letter says that "we have learned that not all email of
the
Office of Vice President and the Executive Office of President for
certain time periods in 2003 was preserved through the normal
archiving
process on the White House computer system."

Anyone know anything more about this?

/end


Reminds me of Nixon's '18 minutes'.


Yes, it does. But in this case deleted email can be retrieved via NSA
methods.


Wouldn't it be a hoot if some disgruntled NSA geek dug up some
incriminating info on Cheney and leaked it? `


It wouldn't change anything.


<sighs>
True. The media would ignore it. The Dems would be too chicken to do
anything about it. The NSA geek would find himself in an orange jumpsuit
headed for Gitmo.


Or tossed out of a helicopter enroute from 8,000 feet.

Headline Washington Times:
"NSA Geek killed in freak accident stepping out of from helicopter. "
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
User: "stoney"

Title: Re: many e-mails from Cheney's office at the time of the Plame leak in 2003 have been deleted contrary to White House policy 06 Feb 2006 03:50:09 PM
On Sun, 05 Feb 2006 21:30:36 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote in alt.atheism

In article <8abcu155v68qspofnblfbhuvge3uh7vc4u@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:

[]

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/007576.php

(February 01, 2006 -- 01:20 PM EDT)

One of our readers found this in a brief New York Daily News update
on
the status of the Scooter Libby prosecution. The meat of the article
is
about Libby's effort to get prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald to fork
over
White House documents he got copies of during the investigation.

But down there in the last graf there's this ...

Fitzgerald, who is fighting Libby's request, said in a letter to
Libby's lawyers that many e-mails from Cheney's office at the time
of
the Plame leak in 2003 have been deleted contrary to White House
policy.

Does that seem a bit odd?

Fitzgerald's letter says that "we have learned that not all email of
the
Office of Vice President and the Executive Office of President for
certain time periods in 2003 was preserved through the normal
archiving
process on the White House computer system."

Anyone know anything more about this?

/end


Reminds me of Nixon's '18 minutes'.


Yes, it does. But in this case deleted email can be retrieved via NSA
methods.


Wouldn't it be a hoot if some disgruntled NSA geek dug up some
incriminating info on Cheney and leaked it? `


It wouldn't change anything.


<sighs>
True. The media would ignore it. The Dems would be too chicken to do
anything about it. The NSA geek would find himself in an orange jumpsuit
headed for Gitmo.


Or tossed out of a helicopter enroute from 8,000 feet.


Headline Washington Times:

"NSA Geek killed in freak accident stepping out of from helicopter. "

Indeed.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.









  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Re: aa - The polls are open! TQOTM for August 2003
Re: aa - The polls are open! TQOTM for August 2003
OT: Censored 2004: The Top 25 Censored Media Stories of 2002-2003
Rachel Corrie 1979-2003
Fred Stone: Lying About Saddam and AQ Since 2003
Run all you like E F Berg (aka "LC" ) but you still haven't answered the question: Who was the person that posted as "Loose Cannon" in 2002-2003 that buddies-up to the likes of Patrick Lee Humphrey and Ray Fischer, et all, and chastised "Osprey"? Who
103,768 Canadian Babies Killed in 2003
Turns Out Dixie Chicks Where Right in 2003 (GOP, the Party of Treason)
who led the a.a pack in 2003?
AA - The polls are open! AQOTM for July 2003
OT: Vote for top weasel of 2003
OT: Really Quite Impressed With Win Advanced Server 2003!
Re: aa - The polls are open! TQOTM for August 2003
The Twenty Most Annoying (and STUPID) Liberals 2003!
aa - The polls are open! TQOTM for Nov. 2003
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER