| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Lin Liangtai" |
| Date: |
17 Jan 2008 07:53:01 AM |
| Object: |
Mars definitely had a bone's structure |
The following NASA microscopic image, taken by Mars Exploration Rover
Spirit, shows the remains of many red blood cells, Haversian systems,
and a long blood vessel still containing red blood cell remains. So
many kinds of bone-related cellular structures in such a small area
indicate they were a part of a fossil bone, not rock minerals.
http://mummy-dinosaur-carved-by-men.googlegroups.com/web/RBC+BV+HA+ON+MARTIAN+BONE.JPG
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Mars definitely had a bone's structure |
17 Jan 2008 12:56:07 PM |
|
|
On Jan 17, 8:53=A0am, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
The following NASA microscopic image, taken by Mars Exploration Rover
Spirit, shows the remains of many red blood cells, Haversian systems,
and a long blood vessel still containing red blood cell remains. So
many kinds of bone-related cellular structures in such a small area
indicate they were a part of a fossil bone, not rock minerals.
http://mummy-dinosaur-carved-by-men.googlegroups.com/web/RBC+BV+HA+ON...
And since there has been no evidence of plant life (past or present)
anywhere on Mars' surface, we can only conclude that the animal
starved to death.
Seriously, though...can't you guys even *try* to come up with
something plausible when you're making up this *****?
-PF
.
|
|
|
| User: "Diagoras" |
|
| Title: Re: Mars definitely had a bone's structure |
18 Jan 2008 12:11:19 AM |
|
|
<panamfloyd@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:09a70b1d-d1be-4bab-a58e-aef816c80d0c@m34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 17, 8:53 am, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
The following NASA microscopic image, taken by Mars Exploration Rover
Spirit, shows the remains of many red blood cells, Haversian systems,
and a long blood vessel still containing red blood cell remains. So
many kinds of bone-related cellular structures in such a small area
indicate they were a part of a fossil bone, not rock minerals.
http://mummy-dinosaur-carved-by-men.googlegroups.com/web/RBC+BV+HA+ON...
And since there has been no evidence of plant life (past or present)
anywhere on Mars' surface, we can only conclude that the animal
starved to death.
Ancient Martians ate at McDonald's, there was no need for plant life. This
also explains why they're all extinct now.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ben Kaufman" |
|
| Title: Re: Mars definitely had a bone's structure |
18 Jan 2008 07:34:41 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:11:19 -0800, "Diagoras" <1@1.1> wrote:
<panamfloyd@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:09a70b1d-d1be-4bab-a58e-aef816c80d0c@m34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 17, 8:53 am, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
The following NASA microscopic image, taken by Mars Exploration Rover
Spirit, shows the remains of many red blood cells, Haversian systems,
and a long blood vessel still containing red blood cell remains. So
many kinds of bone-related cellular structures in such a small area
indicate they were a part of a fossil bone, not rock minerals.
http://mummy-dinosaur-carved-by-men.googlegroups.com/web/RBC+BV+HA+ON...
And since there has been no evidence of plant life (past or present)
anywhere on Mars' surface, we can only conclude that the animal
starved to death.
Ancient Martians ate at McDonald's, there was no need for plant life. This
also explains why they're all extinct now.
A little known fact is that they experimented with their milk shake formula on
mars before bringing it to earth and it had an unanticipated spontaneous
reaction with the atmosphere blowing a good deal of it out into space and thus
killing all of the marsosaurs.
Ben
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ye Old One" |
|
| Title: Re: Mars definitely had a bone's structure |
17 Jan 2008 09:43:34 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 05:53:01 -0800 (PST), Lin Liangtai
<lin440315@yahoo.com.tw> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
The following NASA microscopic image, taken by Mars Exploration Rover
Spirit, shows the remains of many red blood cells, Haversian systems,
and a long blood vessel still containing red blood cell remains. So
many kinds of bone-related cellular structures in such a small area
indicate they were a part of a fossil bone, not rock minerals.
http://mummy-dinosaur-carved-by-men.googlegroups.com/web/RBC+BV+HA+ON+MARTIAN+BONE.JPG
Oh do shut up you stupid moron. None of your claims have any validity
whatsoever.
--
Bob.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ben Kaufman" |
|
| Title: Re: Mars definitely had a bone's structure |
17 Jan 2008 04:20:37 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 05:53:01 -0800 (PST), Lin Liangtai <lin440315@yahoo.com.tw>
wrote:
The following NASA microscopic image, taken by Mars Exploration Rover
Spirit, shows the remains of many red blood cells, Haversian systems,
and a long blood vessel still containing red blood cell remains. So
many kinds of bone-related cellular structures in such a small area
indicate they were a part of a fossil bone, not rock minerals.
http://mummy-dinosaur-carved-by-men.googlegroups.com/web/RBC+BV+HA+ON+MARTIAN+BONE.JPG
You're just too hilarious!
Ben
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: Mars definitely had a bone's structure |
17 Jan 2008 10:15:11 PM |
|
|
One fine day in alt.atheism, Lin Liangtai <lin440315@yahoo.com.tw>
bloodied us up with this:
The following NASA microscopic image, taken by Mars Exploration Rover
Spirit, shows the remains of many red blood cells, Haversian systems,
and a long blood vessel still containing red blood cell remains. So
many kinds of bone-related cellular structures in such a small area
indicate they were a part of a fossil bone, not rock minerals.
I sure am glad I didn't respond to this troll. Wait a minute... I just
did.
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department.
Convicted by Earthquack.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Mars definitely had a bone's structure |
17 Jan 2008 11:46:50 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 04:15:11 GMT, Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com>
wrote:
One fine day in alt.atheism, Lin Liangtai <lin440315@yahoo.com.tw>
bloodied us up with this:
The following NASA microscopic image, taken by Mars Exploration Rover
Spirit, shows the remains of many red blood cells, Haversian systems,
and a long blood vessel still containing red blood cell remains. So
many kinds of bone-related cellular structures in such a small area
indicate they were a part of a fossil bone, not rock minerals.
I sure am glad I didn't respond to this troll. Wait a minute... I just
did.
He almost has to be a Loki. Surely there can't be two people on the
planet as dumb as Ed Conrad.....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: Mars definitely had a bone's structure |
19 Jan 2008 12:47:20 AM |
|
|
One fine day in alt.atheism, John Baker <nunya@bizniz.net> bloodied us up
with this:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 04:15:11 GMT, Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com>
wrote:
One fine day in alt.atheism, Lin Liangtai <lin440315@yahoo.com.tw>
bloodied us up with this:
The following NASA microscopic image, taken by Mars Exploration Rover
Spirit, shows the remains of many red blood cells, Haversian systems,
and a long blood vessel still containing red blood cell remains. So
many kinds of bone-related cellular structures in such a small area
indicate they were a part of a fossil bone, not rock minerals.
I sure am glad I didn't respond to this troll. Wait a minute... I just
did.
He almost has to be a Loki. Surely there can't be two people on the
planet as dumb as Ed Conrad.....
There are! Their name is McNameless.
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department.
Convicted by Earthquack.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
