Religions > Atheism > Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize homosexual lifestyle
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
04 Jun 2007 11:43:02 PM |
| Object: |
Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize homosexual lifestyle |
http://www.onenewsnow.com/2007/06/maryland_taxpayers_may_be_forc.php
Pro-family activist Matt Barber is warning Maryland taxpayers that
they may soon be forced to support the homosexual lifestyle with their
pocketbooks. Barber, policy director for cultural issues for Concerned
Women for America, says Maryland appears on the fast track to becoming
the 15th state to grant domestic partner benefits to homosexual state
employees.
Affirming Barber's report, The Washington Blade, a homosexual advocacy
newspaper, reported that a Maryland state senator has told the
magazine that Gov. Martin O'Malley will support efforts to win
domestic partner benefits for homosexual employees in the next state
workers' union contract. Such a move by Maryland, says the activist,
will amount to another government body offering its endorsement of an
aberrant lifestyle.
"This is a threat to traditional marriage," Barber said, "because it's
just another notch, another step forward by the homosexual lobby, to
get official government recognition of their lifestyle."
He contends that domestic partner benefits devalue traditional
marriage much the same way introducing counterfeit money into commerce
devalues the dollar. "[When] you water down something enough,
eventually it becomes unrecognizable," he asserts, "and we have
counterfeit marriage here; we have the government subsidizing
counterfeit marriage."
While Massachusetts continues to be the lone state extending marriage
rights to homosexual couples, the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against
Defamation website commends other states -- including Hawaii, Maine,
New Jersey, California, Connecticut, New Mexico, Washington, and Iowa
-- which offer limited domestic partner benefits and protections.
"The homosexual lobby has done a masterful job of convincing people
that this is about discrimination," Barber said. "It is not. It is
about benefits being conferred upon those who enter into marriage,
which is beneficial to society. Homosexual relationships are not
beneficial to society; in fact ... the homosexual lifestyle is a very
dangerous lifestyle that oftentimes involves high medical costs."
.
|
|
| User: "*nemo*" |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize homosexual lifestyle |
05 Jun 2007 05:13:42 AM |
|
|
In article <1181018582.534720.167810@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>,
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Pro-family activist Matt Barber is warning Maryland taxpayers that
they may soon be forced to support the homosexual lifestyle with their
pocketbooks.
I wonder if they have a problem with supporting the lifestyle of
srtaight couples that engage in oral sex? Or maybe they'd prefer to only
support couples who use the missionary position? I mean, if a woman were
on top of a man, would that need to be reviewed by taxpayers??
--
Nemo - EAC Commissioner for Bible Belt Underwater Operations.
Atheist #1331 (the Palindrome of doom!)
BAAWA Knight! - One of those warm Southern Knights, y'all!
Charter member, SMASH!!
http://home.earthlink.net/~jehdjh/Relpg.html
Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus
Quotemeister since March 2002
.
|
|
|
| User: "Parsifal" |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize homosexual lifestyle |
05 Jun 2007 07:32:14 AM |
|
|
On 5 juin, 12:13, *nemo* <nemo0...@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:
In article <1181018582.534720.167...@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>,
J Young <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote:
Pro-family activist Matt Barber is warning Maryland taxpayers that
they may soon be forced to support the homosexual lifestyle with their
pocketbooks.
I wonder if they have a problem with supporting the lifestyle of
srtaight couples that engage in oral sex? Or maybe they'd prefer to only
support couples who use the missionary position? I mean, if a woman were
on top of a man, would that need to be reviewed by taxpayers??
You have to admire the nerve of these rightist wackos who want less
politicians in Washington, but more in your bedroom...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Liberalisms A Sickness" |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize homosexual lifestyle |
22 Jun 2007 05:39:06 PM |
|
|
On Jun 5, 5:32 am, Parsifal <jeanpascalvac...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5 juin, 12:13, *nemo* <nemo0...@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:
In article <1181018582.534720.167...@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>,
J Young <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote:
Pro-family activist Matt Barber is warning Maryland taxpayers that
they may soon be forced to support the homosexual lifestyle with their
pocketbooks.
I wonder if they have a problem with supporting the lifestyle of
srtaight couples that engage in oral sex? Or maybe they'd prefer to only
support couples who use the missionary position? I mean, if a woman were
on top of a man, would that need to be reviewed by taxpayers??
You have to admire the nerve of these rightist wackos who want less
politicians in Washington, but more in your bedroom...
You little cumslurpers certainly don't mind it when the "gubmint" gets
in our wallets using billions of straight taxpayer dollars to fund a
cure for AIDS so as you fisting, rimming, smegma-sniffin' blowjobs can
keep doing what it is you're doing without dying in your 20s and 30s
as so many of you do now.
We'd much rather have Uncle Sam in out bedroom than in our wallets
grabbing every nickel they can for faggots, illegal aliens, welfare,
food stamps and fucked up public schools.
Nope, if we did the unimaginably nasty things you faggots do, we
wouldn't want Uncle Sam in our bedroom either.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Spartakus" |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize homosexual lifestyle |
22 Jun 2007 07:57:51 PM |
|
|
A Sickness <droug...@guerrillamail.net> wrote:
We'd much rather have Uncle Sam in out bedroom ...
Yeah, but you're used to crowds.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize homosexuallifestyle |
23 Jun 2007 08:03:29 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:57:51 -0700, Spartakus wrote:
A Sickness <droug...@guerrillamail.net> wrote:
We'd much rather have Uncle Sam in out bedroom ...
Yeah, but you're used to crowds.
<SNORK>
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"What the hell is an aluminum Falcon?"
.
|
|
|
| User: "elizabeth" |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize homosexual lifestyle |
23 Jun 2007 01:28:37 PM |
|
|
On Jun 23, 6:03 am, "Mark K. Bilbo" <g...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:57:51 -0700, Spartakus wrote:
A Sickness <droug...@guerrillamail.net> wrote:
We'd much rather have Uncle Sam in out bedroom ...
Yeah, but you're used to crowds.
<SNORK>
Uh . .. has everyone forgotten that "Amanda" is in fact A MAN?
'sides, if'n we have to support the lifestyle of every stupid Maury
Show who's my babydaddy breeder sow, why not suppor gays? It's
cheaper than the generations of welfare suckers breeders produce.
Plus all the special ed, and prisons their cuntdroppings create.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Liberalisms A Sickness" |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize homosexual lifestyle |
23 Jun 2007 01:33:06 PM |
|
|
On Jun 23, 11:28 am, elizabeth <efran...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 23, 6:03 am, "Mark K. Bilbo" <g...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:57:51 -0700, Spartakus wrote:
A Sickness <droug...@guerrillamail.net> wrote:
We'd much rather have Uncle Sam in out bedroom ...
Yeah, but you're used to crowds.
<SNORK>
Uh . .. has everyone forgotten that "Amanda" is in fact A MAN?
Has everyone forgotten that Elizabeth is a nasty muffdiver?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize homosexual lifestyle |
22 Jun 2007 05:41:54 PM |
|
|
In article <1182551946.176479.268330@a26g2000pre.googlegroups.com>,
Liberalism's A Sickness <drougeac@guerrillamail.net> wrote:
[...]
You little cumslurpers certainly don't mind it when the "gubmint" gets
in our wallets using billions of straight taxpayer dollars to fund a
cure for AIDS so as you fisting, rimming, smegma-sniffin' blowjobs can
keep doing what it is you're doing without dying in your 20s and 30s
as so many of you do now.
We'd much rather have Uncle Sam in out bedroom than in our wallets
grabbing every nickel they can for faggots, illegal aliens, welfare,
food stamps and fucked up public schools.
Nope, if we did the unimaginably nasty things you faggots do, we
wouldn't want Uncle Sam in our bedroom either.
you seem cranky amanda. are you traveling without your vibrating
*****?
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Senrab Nageek" |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize homosexual lifestyle |
22 Jun 2007 05:41:57 PM |
|
|
On Jun 22, 5:39 pm, Liberalism's A Sickness
<droug...@guerrillamail.net> wrote:
On Jun 5, 5:32 am, Parsifal <jeanpascalvac...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5 juin, 12:13, *nemo* <nemo0...@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:
In article <1181018582.534720.167...@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>,
J Young <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote:
Pro-family activist Matt Barber is warning Maryland taxpayers that
they may soon be forced to support the homosexual lifestyle with their
pocketbooks.
I wonder if they have a problem with supporting the lifestyle of
srtaight couples that engage in oral sex? Or maybe they'd prefer to only
support couples who use the missionary position? I mean, if a woman were
on top of a man, would that need to be reviewed by taxpayers??
You have to admire the nerve of these rightist wackos who want less
politicians in Washington, but more in your bedroom...
You little cumslurpers certainly don't mind it when the "gubmint" gets
in our wallets using billions of straight taxpayer dollars to fund a
cure for AIDS so as you fisting, rimming, smegma-sniffin' blowjobs can
keep doing what it is you're doing without dying in your 20s and 30s
as so many of you do now.
We'd much rather have Uncle Sam in out bedroom
Really? What would he find in yours, Amanda?
than in our wallets
grabbing every nickel they can for faggots, illegal aliens, welfare,
food stamps and fucked up public schools.
Nope, if we did the unimaginably nasty things you faggots do, we
wouldn't want Uncle Sam in our bedroom either.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize homosexual lifestyle |
23 Jun 2007 08:09:00 AM |
|
|
Senrab Nageek <senrab.nageek@yahoo.com> writes:
On Jun 22, 5:39 pm, Liberalism's A Sickness
<droug...@guerrillamail.net> wrote:
On Jun 5, 5:32 am, Parsifal <jeanpascalvac...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5 juin, 12:13, *nemo* <nemo0...@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:
In article <1181018582.534720.167...@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>,
J Young <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote:
Pro-family activist Matt Barber is warning Maryland taxpayers that
they may soon be forced to support the homosexual lifestyle with their
pocketbooks.
I wonder if they have a problem with supporting the lifestyle of
srtaight couples that engage in oral sex? Or maybe they'd prefer to only
support couples who use the missionary position? I mean, if a woman were
on top of a man, would that need to be reviewed by taxpayers??
You have to admire the nerve of these rightist wackos who want less
politicians in Washington, but more in your bedroom...
You little cumslurpers certainly don't mind it when the "gubmint" gets
in our wallets using billions of straight taxpayer dollars to fund a
cure for AIDS so as you fisting, rimming, smegma-sniffin' blowjobs can
keep doing what it is you're doing without dying in your 20s and 30s
as so many of you do now.
We'd much rather have Uncle Sam in out bedroom
Really? What would he find in yours, Amanda?
OUCH! I have to call 8th Amendment on that one.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: San Antonio 4, Houston 2 (April 15)
NEXT GAME: October 2007, date/place/opponent TBA
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize homosexual lifestyle |
22 Jun 2007 06:25:23 PM |
|
|
In article <1182552117.784394.286170@z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
Senrab Nageek <senrab.nageek@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Jun 22, 5:39 pm, Liberalism's A Sickness
<droug...@guerrillamail.net> wrote:
We'd much rather have Uncle Sam in out bedroom
Really? What would he find in yours, Amanda?
i think amanda has several bill clinton posters which she uses to
enhance her sexual fantasies.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Senrab Nageek" |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize homosexual lifestyle |
22 Jun 2007 06:37:27 PM |
|
|
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
In article <1182552117.784394.286170@z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
Senrab Nageek <senrab.nageek@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Jun 22, 5:39 pm, Liberalism's A Sickness
<droug...@guerrillamail.net> wrote:
We'd much rather have Uncle Sam in out bedroom
Really? What would he find in yours, Amanda?
i think amanda has several bill clinton posters which she uses to
enhance her sexual fantasies.
Clinton? Monica is her fantasy.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize homosexual lifestyle |
22 Jun 2007 06:39:06 PM |
|
|
In article <1182555447.780115.291130@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
Senrab Nageek <senrab.nageek@yahoo.com> wrote:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
In article <1182552117.784394.286170@z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
Senrab Nageek <senrab.nageek@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Jun 22, 5:39 pm, Liberalism's A Sickness
<droug...@guerrillamail.net> wrote:
We'd much rather have Uncle Sam in out bedroom
Really? What would he find in yours, Amanda?
i think amanda has several bill clinton posters which she uses to
enhance her sexual fantasies.
Clinton? Monica is her fantasy.
i believe you are mistaken. amanda hates hillary primarily because
hillary has slept with bill and she hasn't.
in fact, if you mention bill and hillary in a one of your replies to
her, i think she'll respond with a psychotic episode.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Senrab Nageek" |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize homosexual lifestyle |
23 Jun 2007 07:32:02 AM |
|
|
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
In article <1182555447.780115.291130@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
Senrab Nageek <senrab.nageek@yahoo.com> wrote:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
In article <1182552117.784394.286170@z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
Senrab Nageek <senrab.nageek@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Jun 22, 5:39 pm, Liberalism's A Sickness
<droug...@guerrillamail.net> wrote:
We'd much rather have Uncle Sam in out bedroom
Really? What would he find in yours, Amanda?
i think amanda has several bill clinton posters which she uses to
enhance her sexual fantasies.
Clinton? Monica is her fantasy.
i believe you are mistaken. amanda hates hillary primarily because
hillary has slept with bill and she hasn't.
in fact, if you mention bill and hillary in a one of your replies to
her, i think she'll respond with a psychotic episode.
I forgot: Monica spits.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dionisio" |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize homosexual lifestyle |
23 Jun 2007 12:06:58 AM |
|
|
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
in fact, if you mention bill and hillary in a one of your replies to
her, i think she'll respond with a psychotic episode.
You mean those *are* wasabi stains on certain articles of clothing in the closet?
--
And the Thought of the Moment (TM) is:
Remember, every time you open your mouth to talk, your mind walks out and parades up and
down the words.
--Edwin H. Stuart
(Brought to you by SigChanger. http://www.phranc.nl)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize homosexual lifestyle |
23 Jun 2007 07:17:15 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 01:06:58 -0400, Dionisio
<moc-rr-thgisni@5ellimd.com> wrote:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
in fact, if you mention bill and hillary in a one of your replies to
her, i think she'll respond with a psychotic episode.
You mean those *are* wasabi stains on certain articles of clothing in the closet?
What a waste of wasabi.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize homosexuallifestyle |
23 Jun 2007 08:02:42 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 22:41:57 +0000, Senrab Nageek wrote:
On Jun 22, 5:39 pm, Liberalism's A Sickness <droug...@guerrillamail.net>
wrote:
On Jun 5, 5:32 am, Parsifal <jeanpascalvac...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5 juin, 12:13, *nemo* <nemo0...@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:
In article <1181018582.534720.167...@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>,
J Young <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote:
Pro-family activist Matt Barber is warning Maryland taxpayers
that they may soon be forced to support the homosexual lifestyle
with their pocketbooks.
I wonder if they have a problem with supporting the lifestyle of
srtaight couples that engage in oral sex? Or maybe they'd prefer to
only support couples who use the missionary position? I mean, if a
woman were on top of a man, would that need to be reviewed by
taxpayers??
You have to admire the nerve of these rightist wackos who want less
politicians in Washington, but more in your bedroom...
You little cumslurpers certainly don't mind it when the "gubmint" gets
in our wallets using billions of straight taxpayer dollars to fund a
cure for AIDS so as you fisting, rimming, smegma-sniffin' blowjobs can
keep doing what it is you're doing without dying in your 20s and 30s as
so many of you do now.
We'd much rather have Uncle Sam in out bedroom
Really? What would he find in yours, Amanda?
Dauchsunds?
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism,
because it is a merger of State and corporate power."
- Mussolini
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Liberalisms A Sickness" |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize homosexual lifestyle |
22 Jun 2007 05:48:34 PM |
|
|
On Jun 22, 3:41 pm, Senrab Nageek <senrab.nag...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Jun 22, 5:39 pm, Liberalism's A Sickness
<droug...@guerrillamail.net> wrote:
On Jun 5, 5:32 am, Parsifal <jeanpascalvac...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5 juin, 12:13, *nemo* <nemo0...@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:
In article <1181018582.534720.167...@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>,
J Young <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote:
Pro-family activist Matt Barber is warning Maryland taxpayers that
they may soon be forced to support the homosexual lifestyle with their
pocketbooks.
I wonder if they have a problem with supporting the lifestyle of
srtaight couples that engage in oral sex? Or maybe they'd prefer to only
support couples who use the missionary position? I mean, if a woman were
on top of a man, would that need to be reviewed by taxpayers??
You have to admire the nerve of these rightist wackos who want less
politicians in Washington, but more in your bedroom...
You little cumslurpers certainly don't mind it when the "gubmint" gets
in our wallets using billions of straight taxpayer dollars to fund a
cure for AIDS so as you fisting, rimming, smegma-sniffin' blowjobs can
keep doing what it is you're doing without dying in your 20s and 30s
as so many of you do now.
We'd much rather have Uncle Sam in out bedroom
Really? What would he find in yours, Amanda?
The most gorgeous woman God ever created, of COULD create for that
matter.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Senrab Nageek" |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize homosexual lifestyle |
22 Jun 2007 06:36:49 PM |
|
|
On Jun 22, 5:48 pm, Liberalism's A Sickness
<droug...@guerrillamail.net> wrote:
On Jun 22, 3:41 pm, Senrab Nageek <senrab.nag...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Jun 22, 5:39 pm, Liberalism's A Sickness
<droug...@guerrillamail.net> wrote:
On Jun 5, 5:32 am, Parsifal <jeanpascalvac...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5 juin, 12:13, *nemo* <nemo0...@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote:
In article <1181018582.534720.167...@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>,
J Young <youngopini...@aol.com> wrote:
Pro-family activist Matt Barber is warning Maryland taxpayers that
they may soon be forced to support the homosexual lifestyle with their
pocketbooks.
I wonder if they have a problem with supporting the lifestyle of
srtaight couples that engage in oral sex? Or maybe they'd prefer to only
support couples who use the missionary position? I mean, if a woman were
on top of a man, would that need to be reviewed by taxpayers??
You have to admire the nerve of these rightist wackos who want less
politicians in Washington, but more in your bedroom...
You little cumslurpers certainly don't mind it when the "gubmint" gets
in our wallets using billions of straight taxpayer dollars to fund a
cure for AIDS so as you fisting, rimming, smegma-sniffin' blowjobs can
keep doing what it is you're doing without dying in your 20s and 30s
as so many of you do now.
We'd much rather have Uncle Sam in out bedroom
Really? What would he find in yours, Amanda?
The most gorgeous woman God ever created, of COULD create for that
matter.
How did the most gorgeous woman in the world manage to hook up the
world's most nastiest gutterrat *****? Is your tongue that magical?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dionisio" |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize homosexual lifestyle |
23 Jun 2007 12:03:33 AM |
|
|
Senrab Nageek wrote:
Liberalism's A Sickness <droug...@guerrillamail.net> wrote:
We'd much rather have Uncle Sam in out bedroom
Really? What would he find in yours, Amanda?
Now see here, DAMNIT! Some of us would like to live out our lives *without* knowing that.
--
And the Thought of the Moment (TM) is:
Let's just say, for the sake of argument, that you really like broccoli. You like how it
looks, all green and leafy, you like how it smells, and you like how it tastes. There's
nothing about broccoli you don't like. But, cauliflower is a different story. Sure,
Cauliflower looks a little like broccoli, but not a lot....and it kinda feels the same,
but not really, and it doesn't taste as good...you just don't like cauliflower. So should
you be sent to a group that helps you to learn how to like cauliflower better than
broccoli? Should there be church-and-government and privately-funded organizations working
to help those broccoli lovers who just don't like cauliflower?
-- (Patch), 22 Nov 1994, on programs which claim to convert gays into
heteros.
(Brought to you by SigChanger. http://www.phranc.nl)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize heterosexual lifestyle |
05 Jun 2007 12:06:24 AM |
|
|
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
http://www.onenewsnow.com/2007/06/maryland_taxpayers_may_be_forc.php
Pro-family activist Matt Barber
aka, religious bigot Matt Barber
is warning Maryland taxpayers that
they may soon be forced to support the homosexual lifestyle with their
pocketbooks.
Because they already support the heterosexual lifestyle with their
pocketbooks.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize heterosexual lifestyle |
05 Jun 2007 01:37:38 AM |
|
|
On 05 Jun 2007 05:06:24 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
http://www.onenewsnow.com/2007/06/maryland_taxpayers_may_be_forc.php
Pro-family activist Matt Barber
aka, religious bigot Matt Barber
is warning Maryland taxpayers that
they may soon be forced to support the homosexual lifestyle with their
pocketbooks.
Because they already support the heterosexual lifestyle with their
pocketbooks.
95% of the tax payer are heterosexuals. The homos are already getting
a free lunch.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize heterosexual lifestyle |
05 Jun 2007 11:02:07 AM |
|
|
<leroyblue@pillinor.net> wrote:
rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
http://www.onenewsnow.com/2007/06/maryland_taxpayers_may_be_forc.php
Pro-family activist Matt Barber
aka, religious bigot Matt Barber
is warning Maryland taxpayers that
they may soon be forced to support the homosexual lifestyle with their
pocketbooks.
Because they already support the heterosexual lifestyle with their
pocketbooks.
95% of the tax payer are heterosexuals.
100% of the money goes to heterosexuals.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize heterosexual lifestyle |
05 Jun 2007 06:40:57 PM |
|
|
On 05 Jun 2007 16:02:07 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
<leroyblue@pillinor.net> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
http://www.onenewsnow.com/2007/06/maryland_taxpayers_may_be_forc.php
Pro-family activist Matt Barber
aka, religious bigot Matt Barber
is warning Maryland taxpayers that
they may soon be forced to support the homosexual lifestyle with their
pocketbooks.
Because they already support the heterosexual lifestyle with their
pocketbooks.
95% of the tax payer are heterosexuals.
100% of the money goes to heterosexuals.
Good fiscal planning on the states part since heterosexuality is the
future.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize heterosexual lifestyle |
05 Jun 2007 09:52:05 PM |
|
|
<leroyblue@pillinor.net> wrote:
On 05 Jun 2007 16:02:07 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
<leroyblue@pillinor.net> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
http://www.onenewsnow.com/2007/06/maryland_taxpayers_may_be_forc.php
Pro-family activist Matt Barber
aka, religious bigot Matt Barber
is warning Maryland taxpayers that
they may soon be forced to support the homosexual lifestyle with their
pocketbooks.
Because they already support the heterosexual lifestyle with their
pocketbooks.
95% of the tax payer are heterosexuals.
100% of the money goes to heterosexuals.
Good fiscal planning on the states part since heterosexuality is the
future.
So you're a thief who steals from others and you're unAmerican
because you hate equallity.
--
Ray Fischer
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize heterosexual lifestyle |
05 Jun 2007 11:03:01 PM |
|
|
On 06 Jun 2007 02:52:05 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
<leroyblue@pillinor.net> wrote:
On 05 Jun 2007 16:02:07 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
<leroyblue@pillinor.net> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
http://www.onenewsnow.com/2007/06/maryland_taxpayers_may_be_forc.php
Pro-family activist Matt Barber
aka, religious bigot Matt Barber
is warning Maryland taxpayers that
they may soon be forced to support the homosexual lifestyle with their
pocketbooks.
Because they already support the heterosexual lifestyle with their
pocketbooks.
95% of the tax payer are heterosexuals.
100% of the money goes to heterosexuals.
Good fiscal planning on the states part since heterosexuality is the
future.
So you're a thief who steals from others and you're unAmerican
because you hate equallity.
No, I believe in giving credit where credit is due and certainly those
who pay the vast majority of taxes should reap the most benefits.
That's fair and equal.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize heterosexual lifestyle |
05 Jun 2007 11:11:05 PM |
|
|
<leroyblue@pillinor.net> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
<leroyblue@pillinor.net> wrote:
On 05 Jun 2007 16:02:07 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
<leroyblue@pillinor.net> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
http://www.onenewsnow.com/2007/06/maryland_taxpayers_may_be_forc.php
Pro-family activist Matt Barber
aka, religious bigot Matt Barber
is warning Maryland taxpayers that
they may soon be forced to support the homosexual lifestyle with their
pocketbooks.
Because they already support the heterosexual lifestyle with their
pocketbooks.
95% of the tax payer are heterosexuals.
100% of the money goes to heterosexuals.
Good fiscal planning on the states part since heterosexuality is the
future.
So you're a thief who steals from others and you're unAmerican
because you hate equallity.
No, I believe in giving credit where credit is due and certainly those
who pay the vast majority of taxes should reap the most benefits.
That's fair and equal.
Making homosexuals pay for benefits enjoyed solely by heterosexuals is
neither fair nor equal.
--
Ray Fischer
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize heterosexual lifestyle |
07 Jun 2007 02:15:43 AM |
|
|
On 06 Jun 2007 04:11:05 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
<leroyblue@pillinor.net> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
<leroyblue@pillinor.net> wrote:
On 05 Jun 2007 16:02:07 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
<leroyblue@pillinor.net> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
http://www.onenewsnow.com/2007/06/maryland_taxpayers_may_be_forc.php
Pro-family activist Matt Barber
aka, religious bigot Matt Barber
is warning Maryland taxpayers that
they may soon be forced to support the homosexual lifestyle with their
pocketbooks.
Because they already support the heterosexual lifestyle with their
pocketbooks.
95% of the tax payer are heterosexuals.
100% of the money goes to heterosexuals.
Good fiscal planning on the states part since heterosexuality is the
future.
So you're a thief who steals from others and you're unAmerican
because you hate equallity.
No, I believe in giving credit where credit is due and certainly those
who pay the vast majority of taxes should reap the most benefits.
That's fair and equal.
Making homosexuals pay for benefits enjoyed solely by heterosexuals is
neither fair nor equal.
Heterosexuality benefits all of society. Homosexuality benefits no
one. Even a homophile has to admit that fact.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize heterosexual lifestyle |
07 Jun 2007 10:59:12 AM |
|
|
<leroyblue@pillinor.net> wrote:
On 06 Jun 2007 04:11:05 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
<leroyblue@pillinor.net> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
<leroyblue@pillinor.net> wrote:
On 05 Jun 2007 16:02:07 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
<leroyblue@pillinor.net> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
http://www.onenewsnow.com/2007/06/maryland_taxpayers_may_be_forc.php
Pro-family activist Matt Barber
aka, religious bigot Matt Barber
is warning Maryland taxpayers that
they may soon be forced to support the homosexual lifestyle with their
pocketbooks.
Because they already support the heterosexual lifestyle with their
pocketbooks.
95% of the tax payer are heterosexuals.
100% of the money goes to heterosexuals.
Good fiscal planning on the states part since heterosexuality is the
future.
So you're a thief who steals from others and you're unAmerican
because you hate equallity.
No, I believe in giving credit where credit is due and certainly those
who pay the vast majority of taxes should reap the most benefits.
That's fair and equal.
Making homosexuals pay for benefits enjoyed solely by heterosexuals is
neither fair nor equal.
Heterosexuality benefits all of society.
Equality benefits all of society.
--
Ray Fischer
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Maryland taxpayers may be forced to subsidize heterosexual lifestyle |
07 Jun 2007 06:05:12 PM |
|
|
On 07 Jun 2007 15:59:12 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
<leroyblue@pillinor.net> wrote:
On 06 Jun 2007 04:11:05 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
<leroyblue@pillinor.net> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
<leroyblue@pillinor.net> wrote:
On 05 Jun 2007 16:02:07 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
<leroyblue@pillinor.net> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
http://www.onenewsnow.com/2007/06/maryland_taxpayers_may_be_forc.php
Pro-family activist Matt Barber
aka, religious bigot Matt Barber
is warning Maryland taxpayers that
they may soon be forced to support the homosexual lifestyle with their
pocketbooks.
Because they already support the heterosexual lifestyle with their
pocketbooks.
95% of the tax payer are heterosexuals.
100% of the money goes to heterosexuals.
Good fiscal planning on the states part since heterosexuality is the
future.
So you're a thief who steals from others and you're unAmerican
because you hate equallity.
No, I believe in giving credit where credit is due and certainly those
who pay the vast majority of taxes should reap the most benefits.
That's fair and equal.
Making homosexuals pay for benefits enjoyed solely by heterosexuals is
neither fair nor equal.
Heterosexuality benefits all of society.
Equality benefits all of society.
No, it doesn't. Of course you believe that it does because you have a
tender spot in your heart for pedophiles, rapist, homosexuals and such
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
