| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"johac" |
| Date: |
01 Dec 2003 12:55:06 AM |
| Object: |
Mass. Bishops Lecture Faithful on Gay Marriage |
Hm. The RCC is sermonizing the sheep on the evils on homosexuality and
gay marriage. Did I just catch a faint but unmistakable whiff of the
scent of hypocrisy here?
http://tinyurl.com/x67m
---
Mass. Bishops Slam Gay Marriage Ruling
Sun Nov 30, 8:21 PM ET
By STEVE LeBLANC, Associated Press Writer
BOSTON - Massachusetts' Roman Catholic bishops are telling
parishioners that a state court decision supporting gay marriage is a
"national tragedy" that could "erode even further the institution of
marriage."
In a strongly worded letter to be read at Mass this weekend, the
bishops also said the Supreme Judicial Court's mid-May deadline for
the Legislature to rewrite marriage laws to provide benefits for gay
couples is too rushed.
The bishops, among the leading opponents of the ruling, urged
parishioners "to contact the governor and their state legislators to
urge them to find a way to give our citizens more time to deal with
this issue."
Boston Archbishop Sean P. O'Malley and Bishops Thomas Dupre, Daniel P.
Reilly and George Coleman also complained that the state high court
ruling promotes "divisions in society by villainizing as bigotry the
legitimate defense of thousands of years of tradition.
"Marriage is a gift of God ... it is not just one lifestyle among
many," the bishops wrote in the letter, which was published in the
Boston Archdiocese's newspaper, The Pilot.
Gary Buseck, executive director of Gay & Lesbian Advocates &
Defenders, said the letter's language disappointed him.
"I don't think the court villainizes anyone. The Roman Catholic Church
is being very clever to try to cast themselves as the victim here,"
Buseck said.
David Wilson, one of the plaintiffs in the case that led to the
ruling, said the bishops are confusing civil and religious marriage.
The court ruling will not require any religion to perform same-sex
marriage ceremonies.
State Rep. Philip Travis, who supports amending the state constitution
to define marriage as a union between a man and a woman, said the May
deadline won't change unless the court re-enters the case. The
earliest such an amendment could go to voters is November 2006.
A spokeswoman for Gov. Mitt Romney, who also supports the proposed
amendment, declined comment on Saturday.
---
--
John Hachmann, aa #1782
- Question authority. Now more than ever. -
.
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Mass. Bishops Lecture Faithful on Gay Marriage |
01 Dec 2003 01:30:57 AM |
|
|
"johac" <jhachm@remove.ixpres.com> wrote
Hm. The RCC is sermonizing the sheep on the evils on
homosexuality and gay marriage. Did I just catch a
faint but unmistakable whiff of the scent of hypocrisy
here?
If you're standing on the surface of Mars... maybe. Down here
on Earth the stench is overwhelming.
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Mass. Bishops Lecture Faithful on Gay Marriage |
02 Dec 2003 12:28:38 AM |
|
|
In article <U4OdnY5zwJXucFeiRVn-jA@comcast.com>,
"JTEM" <jaytem@yahoo.com> wrote:
"johac" <jhachm@remove.ixpres.com> wrote
Hm. The RCC is sermonizing the sheep on the evils on
homosexuality and gay marriage. Did I just catch a
faint but unmistakable whiff of the scent of hypocrisy
here?
If you're standing on the surface of Mars... maybe. Down here
on Earth the stench is overwhelming.
Sarcasm.
--
John Hachmann, aa #1782
- Question authority. Now more than ever. -
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lord Calvert" |
|
| Title: Re: Mass. Bishops Lecture Faithful on Gay Marriage |
01 Dec 2003 10:57:08 AM |
|
|
Hm. The RCC is sermonizing the sheep on the evils on homosexuality and
gay marriage. Did I just catch a faint but unmistakable whiff of the
scent of hypocrisy here?
Methinks Archbishop O'Malley has an awfully big plank is his eye.
One would think that because of the pedophilia scandals that any Archbishop of
Boston has no business criticizing ANYONE. For him to call consensual
gay-marriage "a national tragedy" when his own archdiocese was raping young
boys for decades is the height of arrogant hubris.
Rich Goranson, Amherst, NY, USA (aa#MCMXCIX, a-vet#1)
EAC Department of Applied Rattan Use
"Without faith we might relapse into scientific or rational thinking, which
leads by a slippery slope toward constitutional democracy." - Robert Anton
Wilson
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Mass. Bishops Lecture Faithful on Gay Marriage |
02 Dec 2003 12:30:27 AM |
|
|
In article <20031201115708.16385.00001004@mb-m23.aol.com>,
forlornh@aol.complex (Lord Calvert) wrote:
Hm. The RCC is sermonizing the sheep on the evils on homosexuality and
gay marriage. Did I just catch a faint but unmistakable whiff of the
scent of hypocrisy here?
Methinks Archbishop O'Malley has an awfully big plank is his eye.
One would think that because of the pedophilia scandals that any Archbishop of
Boston has no business criticizing ANYONE. For him to call consensual
gay-marriage "a national tragedy" when his own archdiocese was raping young
boys for decades is the height of arrogant hubris.
How does that go? "Do as we preach, not as we do." or something like
that.
--
John Hachmann, aa #1782
- Question authority. Now more than ever. -
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Matthews" |
|
| Title: Re: Mass. Bishops Lecture Faithful on Gay Marriage |
01 Dec 2003 05:24:56 AM |
|
|
In article
<jhachm-FE864E.22550630112003@news-central.ash.giganews.com>,
johac <jhachm@remove.ixpres.com> wrote:
Hm. The RCC is sermonizing the sheep on the evils on homosexuality and
gay marriage. Did I just catch a faint but unmistakable whiff of the
scent of hypocrisy here?
http://tinyurl.com/x67m
Mass. Bishops Slam Gay Marriage Ruling
Sun Nov 30, 8:21 PM ET
By STEVE LeBLANC, Associated Press Writer
BOSTON - Massachusetts' Roman Catholic bishops are telling
parishioners that a state court decision supporting gay marriage is a
"national tragedy" that could "erode even further the institution of
marriage."
According to recent studies, fewer and fewer heterosexuals are
interested in getting married. It's also a commonplace that fifty per
cent of North Americans who marry end up divorcing, a number which has
been steadily increasing in recent decades. Marriage has become
trivialized, being easily available to any two people of the opposite
sex, who can in certain American states marry on a whim, with less
thought than if they were buying a couch, and dissolve the union almost
as quickly. Recently it's come to the public's attention that there is a
substantial class of people who are legally barred from getting married
but who very strongly desire to marry, thereby making more marriages
(and, by extension, more stable households).
I wish someone would explain to me how allowing these people to wed
would erode and not actually shore up the institution of marriage.
Robert Matthews
a.a. #1801
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Mass. Bishops Lecture Faithful on Gay Marriage |
02 Dec 2003 11:48:46 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 07:24:56 -0400, Robert Matthews
<pyramus@ns.deleteme.sympatico.nospam.ca>, Message ID:
<pyramus-71CAA5.07245601122003@nr-tor02.bellnexxia.net> wrote in
alt.atheism;
In article
<jhachm-FE864E.22550630112003@news-central.ash.giganews.com>,
johac <jhachm@remove.ixpres.com> wrote:
Hm. The RCC is sermonizing the sheep on the evils on homosexuality and
gay marriage. Did I just catch a faint but unmistakable whiff of the
scent of hypocrisy here?
http://tinyurl.com/x67m
Mass. Bishops Slam Gay Marriage Ruling
Sun Nov 30, 8:21 PM ET
By STEVE LeBLANC, Associated Press Writer
BOSTON - Massachusetts' Roman Catholic bishops are telling
parishioners that a state court decision supporting gay marriage is a
"national tragedy" that could "erode even further the institution of
marriage."
According to recent studies, fewer and fewer heterosexuals are
interested in getting married. It's also a commonplace that fifty per
cent of North Americans who marry end up divorcing, a number which has
been steadily increasing in recent decades. Marriage has become
trivialized, being easily available to any two people of the opposite
sex, who can in certain American states marry on a whim, with less
thought than if they were buying a couch, and dissolve the union almost
as quickly. Recently it's come to the public's attention that there is a
substantial class of people who are legally barred from getting married
but who very strongly desire to marry, thereby making more marriages
(and, by extension, more stable households).
I wish someone would explain to me how allowing these people to wed
would erode and not actually shore up the institution of marriage.
Why, it would take away their 'special rites (rights).'
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: Mass. Bishops Lecture Faithful on Gay Marriage |
01 Dec 2003 02:33:27 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:55:06 -0800, johac <jhachm@remove.ixpres.com>
wrote:
Hm. The RCC is sermonizing the sheep on the evils on homosexuality and
gay marriage. Did I just catch a faint but unmistakable whiff of the
scent of hypocrisy here?
By Neddy Ruttledge, you're right!
http://tinyurl.com/x67m
---
Mass. Bishops Slam Gay Marriage Ruling
Sun Nov 30, 8:21 PM ET
By STEVE LeBLANC, Associated Press Writer
BOSTON - Massachusetts' Roman Catholic bishops are telling
parishioners that a state court decision supporting gay marriage is a
"national tragedy" that could "erode even further the institution of
marriage."
In a strongly worded letter to be read at Mass this weekend, the
bishops also said the Supreme Judicial Court's mid-May deadline for
the Legislature to rewrite marriage laws to provide benefits for gay
couples is too rushed.
The bishops, among the leading opponents of the ruling, urged
parishioners "to contact the governor and their state legislators to
urge them to find a way to give our citizens more time to deal with
this issue."
Boston Archbishop Sean P. O'Malley and Bishops Thomas Dupre, Daniel P.
Reilly and George Coleman also complained that the state high court
ruling promotes "divisions in society by villainizing as bigotry the
legitimate defense of thousands of years of tradition.
"Marriage is a gift of God ... it is not just one lifestyle among
many," the bishops wrote in the letter, which was published in the
Boston Archdiocese's newspaper, The Pilot.
Gary Buseck, executive director of Gay & Lesbian Advocates &
Defenders, said the letter's language disappointed him.
"I don't think the court villainizes anyone. The Roman Catholic Church
is being very clever to try to cast themselves as the victim here,"
Buseck said.
David Wilson, one of the plaintiffs in the case that led to the
ruling, said the bishops are confusing civil and religious marriage.
The court ruling will not require any religion to perform same-sex
marriage ceremonies.
State Rep. Philip Travis, who supports amending the state constitution
to define marriage as a union between a man and a woman, said the May
deadline won't change unless the court re-enters the case. The
earliest such an amendment could go to voters is November 2006.
A spokeswoman for Gov. Mitt Romney, who also supports the proposed
amendment, declined comment on Saturday.
---
Michelle Malkin (Mickey)
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Hands that work are better than mouths that pray -
Robert Ingersoll
****************************************************
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Mass. Bishops Lecture Faithful on Gay Marriage |
02 Dec 2003 12:26:25 AM |
|
|
In article <g6vlsvcvh42a90jug7so11gjvj5s2ecqk4@4ax.com>,
Michelle Malkin <hypatiab7@earthlink.net> wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:55:06 -0800, johac <jhachm@remove.ixpres.com>
wrote:
Hm. The RCC is sermonizing the sheep on the evils on homosexuality and
gay marriage. Did I just catch a faint but unmistakable whiff of the
scent of hypocrisy here?
By Neddy Ruttledge, you're right!
You got me, I'm afraid. Who is Neddy Ruttledge?
--
John Hachmann, aa #1782
- Question authority. Now more than ever. -
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: Mass. Bishops Lecture Faithful on Gay Marriage |
02 Dec 2003 11:22:27 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 22:26:25 -0800, johac <jhachm@remove.ixpres.com>
wrote:
In article <g6vlsvcvh42a90jug7so11gjvj5s2ecqk4@4ax.com>,
Michelle Malkin <hypatiab7@earthlink.net> wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:55:06 -0800, johac <jhachm@remove.ixpres.com>
wrote:
Hm. The RCC is sermonizing the sheep on the evils on homosexuality and
gay marriage. Did I just catch a faint but unmistakable whiff of the
scent of hypocrisy here?
By Neddy Ruttledge, you're right!
You got me, I'm afraid. Who is Neddy Ruttledge?
Edward Ruttledge was a Signer of the Declaration of Independence.
You used a line very similar to one that his character used in the
show/movie "1776" when the subject of slavery was being argued.
Michelle Malkin (Mickey)
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Hands that work are better than mouths that pray -
Robert Ingersoll
****************************************************
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Mass. Bishops Lecture Faithful on Gay Marriage |
03 Dec 2003 12:08:24 AM |
|
|
In article <8hsqsvovjtcnetjh6rcv1mdkr4lbu803hq@4ax.com>,
Michelle Malkin <hypatiab7@earthlink.net> wrote:
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 22:26:25 -0800, johac <jhachm@remove.ixpres.com>
wrote:
In article <g6vlsvcvh42a90jug7so11gjvj5s2ecqk4@4ax.com>,
Michelle Malkin <hypatiab7@earthlink.net> wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:55:06 -0800, johac <jhachm@remove.ixpres.com>
wrote:
Hm. The RCC is sermonizing the sheep on the evils on homosexuality and
gay marriage. Did I just catch a faint but unmistakable whiff of the
scent of hypocrisy here?
By Neddy Ruttledge, you're right!
You got me, I'm afraid. Who is Neddy Ruttledge?
Edward Ruttledge was a Signer of the Declaration of Independence.
You used a line very similar to one that his character used in the
show/movie "1776" when the subject of slavery was being argued.
Thanks, Mickey. Time to dust off the old history books again. I never
did see the play or the movie. I'll have to look for that one too.
--
John Hachmann, aa #1782
- Question authority. Now more than ever. -
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gregory Gadow" |
|
| Title: Re: Mass. Bishops Lecture Faithful on Gay Marriage |
03 Dec 2003 08:31:34 AM |
|
|
johac wrote:
In article <8hsqsvovjtcnetjh6rcv1mdkr4lbu803hq@4ax.com>,
Michelle Malkin <hypatiab7@earthlink.net> wrote:
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 22:26:25 -0800, johac <jhachm@remove.ixpres.com>
wrote:
In article <g6vlsvcvh42a90jug7so11gjvj5s2ecqk4@4ax.com>,
Michelle Malkin <hypatiab7@earthlink.net> wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:55:06 -0800, johac <jhachm@remove.ixpres.com>
wrote:
Hm. The RCC is sermonizing the sheep on the evils on homosexuality and
gay marriage. Did I just catch a faint but unmistakable whiff of the
scent of hypocrisy here?
By Neddy Ruttledge, you're right!
You got me, I'm afraid. Who is Neddy Ruttledge?
Edward Ruttledge was a Signer of the Declaration of Independence.
You used a line very similar to one that his character used in the
show/movie "1776" when the subject of slavery was being argued.
Thanks, Mickey. Time to dust off the old history books again. I never
did see the play or the movie. I'll have to look for that one too.
The movie was a blast; I saw it several times in my youth. It is quite low on
actual historical content, but for a musical, it ranks surprisingly high as
entertainment.
--
Gregory Gadow
techbear@serv.net
http://www.serv.net/~techbear
"If you make yourself a sheep, the wolves will eat you."
-- Benjamin Franklin
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lord Calvert" |
|
| Title: Re: Mass. Bishops Lecture Faithful on Gay Marriage |
03 Dec 2003 10:11:34 AM |
|
|
Thanks, Mickey. Time to dust off the old history books again. I never
did see the play or the movie. I'll have to look for that one too.
The movie was a blast; I saw it several times in my youth. It is quite low on
actual historical content, but for a musical, it ranks surprisingly high as
entertainment.
You know that Richard Nixon censored the film and made them cut a song because
he felt it was an attack on Republicans, characterizing them as spineless
cowards. Only in recent years has the song been performed.
The song is Cool, Cool, Considerate Men. Music and lyrics by Sherman Edwards.
Oh say do you see what I see?
Congress sitting here in sweet serenity
I could cheer; the reason's clear
For the first time in a year Adams isn't here
And look, the sun is in the sky
A breeze is blowing by, and there's not a single fly
I sing hosanna, hosanna
Hosanna, hosanna
And it's cool
Come ye cool cool conservative men
The likes of which may never be seen again
We have land, cash in hand
Self-command, future planned
Fortune flies, society survives
In neatly ordered lives with well-endowered wives
We sing hosanna, hosanna
To our breeding and our banner
We are cool
Come ye cool cool considerate set
We'll dance together to the same minuet
To the right, ever to the right
Never to the left, forever to the right
May our creed be never to exceed
Regulated speed, no matter what the need
We sing hosanna, hosanna
Enblazoned on our banner
Is keep cool
What we do we do rationally
We never ever go off half-cocked, not we
Why begin till we know that we can win
And if we cannot win why bother to begin?
We say this game's not of our choosing
Why should we risk losing?
We are cool
To the right, ever to the right
Never to the left, forever to the right
We have gold, a market that will hold
Tradition that is old, a reluctance to be bold.
I sing hosanna, hosanna
In a sane and lucid manner
We are cool
Come ye cool cool considerate men
The likes of which may never be seen again
With our land, cash in hand
Self-command, future planned
And we'll hold to our gold
Tradition that is old, reluctant to be bold.
We say this game's not of our choosing
Why should we risk losing?
We cool, cool, cool
Cool, cool, cool
Cool cool men.
Rich Goranson, Amherst, NY, USA (aa#MCMXCIX, a-vet#1)
EAC Department of Applied Rattan Use
"Without faith we might relapse into scientific or rational thinking, which
leads by a slippery slope toward constitutional democracy." - Robert Anton
Wilson
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Mass. Bishops Lecture Faithful on Gay Marriage |
04 Dec 2003 12:07:26 AM |
|
|
In article <3FCDF3C6.23638A80@serv.net>,
Gregory Gadow <techbear@serv.net> wrote:
johac wrote:
In article <8hsqsvovjtcnetjh6rcv1mdkr4lbu803hq@4ax.com>,
Michelle Malkin <hypatiab7@earthlink.net> wrote:
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 22:26:25 -0800, johac <jhachm@remove.ixpres.com>
wrote:
In article <g6vlsvcvh42a90jug7so11gjvj5s2ecqk4@4ax.com>,
Michelle Malkin <hypatiab7@earthlink.net> wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:55:06 -0800, johac <jhachm@remove.ixpres.com>
wrote:
Hm. The RCC is sermonizing the sheep on the evils on homosexuality and
gay marriage. Did I just catch a faint but unmistakable whiff of the
scent of hypocrisy here?
By Neddy Ruttledge, you're right!
You got me, I'm afraid. Who is Neddy Ruttledge?
Edward Ruttledge was a Signer of the Declaration of Independence.
You used a line very similar to one that his character used in the
show/movie "1776" when the subject of slavery was being argued.
Thanks, Mickey. Time to dust off the old history books again. I never
did see the play or the movie. I'll have to look for that one too.
The movie was a blast; I saw it several times in my youth. It is quite low on
actual historical content, but for a musical, it ranks surprisingly high as
entertainment.
I read up on it. I'm definitely going to rent it.
--
John Hachmann, aa #1782
- Question authority. Now more than ever. -
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Mass. Bishops Lecture Faithful on Gay Marriage |
02 Dec 2003 11:47:37 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:55:06 -0800, johac <jhachm@remove.ixpres.com>,
Message ID: <jhachm-FE864E.22550630112003@news-central.ash.giganews.com>
wrote in alt.atheism;
Hm. The RCC is sermonizing the sheep on the evils on homosexuality and
gay marriage. Did I just catch a faint but unmistakable whiff of the
scent of hypocrisy here?
Not just a whiff, but a tri-state dairy farm.
http://tinyurl.com/x67m
---
Mass. Bishops Slam Gay Marriage Ruling
Sun Nov 30, 8:21 PM ET
By STEVE LeBLANC, Associated Press Writer
BOSTON - Massachusetts' Roman Catholic bishops are telling
parishioners that a state court decision supporting gay marriage is a
"national tragedy" that could "erode even further the institution of
marriage."
In a strongly worded letter to be read at Mass this weekend, the
bishops also said the Supreme Judicial Court's mid-May deadline for
the Legislature to rewrite marriage laws to provide benefits for gay
couples is too rushed.
The bishops, among the leading opponents of the ruling, urged
parishioners "to contact the governor and their state legislators to
urge them to find a way to give our citizens more time to deal with
this issue."
Boston Archbishop Sean P. O'Malley and Bishops Thomas Dupre, Daniel P.
Reilly and George Coleman also complained that the state high court
ruling promotes "divisions in society by villainizing as bigotry the
legitimate defense of thousands of years of tradition.
"Marriage is a gift of God ... it is not just one lifestyle among
many," the bishops wrote in the letter, which was published in the
Boston Archdiocese's newspaper, The Pilot.
Gary Buseck, executive director of Gay & Lesbian Advocates &
Defenders, said the letter's language disappointed him.
"I don't think the court villainizes anyone. The Roman Catholic Church
is being very clever to try to cast themselves as the victim here,"
Buseck said.
David Wilson, one of the plaintiffs in the case that led to the
ruling, said the bishops are confusing civil and religious marriage.
The court ruling will not require any religion to perform same-sex
marriage ceremonies.
State Rep. Philip Travis, who supports amending the state constitution
to define marriage as a union between a man and a woman, said the May
deadline won't change unless the court re-enters the case. The
earliest such an amendment could go to voters is November 2006.
A spokeswoman for Gov. Mitt Romney, who also supports the proposed
amendment, declined comment on Saturday.
---
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Mass. Bishops Lecture Faithful on Gay Marriage |
04 Dec 2003 12:05:58 AM |
|
|
In article <56uqsvchpl9mo5on9c62aedg077kjv8io7@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:55:06 -0800, johac <jhachm@remove.ixpres.com>,
Message ID: <jhachm-FE864E.22550630112003@news-central.ash.giganews.com>
wrote in alt.atheism;
Hm. The RCC is sermonizing the sheep on the evils on homosexuality and
gay marriage. Did I just catch a faint but unmistakable whiff of the
scent of hypocrisy here?
Not just a whiff, but a tri-state dairy farm.
I think that my comment contained just a tiny wee bit of sarcasm. :-)
--
John Hachmann, aa #1782
- Question authority. Now more than ever. -
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Mass. Bishops Lecture Faithful on Gay Marriage |
07 Dec 2003 12:52:02 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 22:05:58 -0800, johac <jhachm@remove.ixpres.com>,
Message ID: <jhachm-37FA60.22055803122003@news-central.ash.giganews.com>
wrote in alt.atheism;
In article <56uqsvchpl9mo5on9c62aedg077kjv8io7@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:55:06 -0800, johac <jhachm@remove.ixpres.com>,
Message ID: <jhachm-FE864E.22550630112003@news-central.ash.giganews.com>
wrote in alt.atheism;
Hm. The RCC is sermonizing the sheep on the evils on homosexuality and
gay marriage. Did I just catch a faint but unmistakable whiff of the
scent of hypocrisy here?
Not just a whiff, but a tri-state dairy farm.
I think that my comment contained just a tiny wee bit of sarcasm. :-)
Just like my comment... :)
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
