| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"maff" |
| Date: |
11 Feb 2005 06:17:06 AM |
| Object: |
Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban |
Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/11/national/11stem.html
By PAM BELLUCK
Gov. Mitt Romney, a Republican, wants to ban the creating of embryos
specifically for medical research.
Massachusetts
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/847684bddc1a17ae
Stem cells
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/bd98dcae31a61a18
.
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban |
13 Feb 2005 08:17:18 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:17:58 GMT, phy <phy00x@yahoo.com> wrote:
"maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:1108124226.137193.3820@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban
The bad thing about stem cell research ban is that while US scientists have
their hands tied, those in other countries are going to make all the
advances and those countries will be the ones to get all the financial
benefits. Meanwhile the US will lose its place as the technical powerhouse
of the world.
That's already underway.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.
|
|
|
| User: "phy" |
|
| Title: Re: Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban |
28 Feb 2005 02:05:34 PM |
|
|
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
news:vf20119p29adtp5rnav8jlatk06kr9uciq@4ax.com:
Meanwhile the US will lose its place as the technical powerhouse
of the world.
That's already underway.
Exactly.
-phy
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban |
01 Mar 2005 09:10:28 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:05:34 GMT, phy <phy00x@yahoo.com> wrote:
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote in
news:vf20119p29adtp5rnav8jlatk06kr9uciq@4ax.com:
Meanwhile the US will lose its place as the technical powerhouse
of the world.
That's already underway.
Exactly.
And creaping up to flank speed.
-phy
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fencingsax" |
|
| Title: Re: Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban |
13 Feb 2005 08:58:13 PM |
|
|
stoney wrote:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:17:58 GMT, phy <phy00x@yahoo.com> wrote:
"maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:1108124226.137193.3820@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban
The bad thing about stem cell research ban is that while US
scientists have
their hands tied, those in other countries are going to make all the
advances and those countries will be the ones to get all the
financial
benefits. Meanwhile the US will lose its place as the technical
powerhouse
of the world.
That's already underway.
We haven't really held that title for several decades now.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban |
14 Feb 2005 02:04:29 PM |
|
|
On 13 Feb 2005 18:58:13 -0800, "Fencingsax" <Christocbd@gmail.com>
wrote:
stoney wrote:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:17:58 GMT, phy <phy00x@yahoo.com> wrote:
"maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:1108124226.137193.3820@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban
The bad thing about stem cell research ban is that while US
scientists have
their hands tied, those in other countries are going to make all the
advances and those countries will be the ones to get all the
financial
benefits. Meanwhile the US will lose its place as the technical
powerhouse
of the world.
That's already underway.
We haven't really held that title for several decades now.
Unsurprising.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jeffrey Turner" |
|
| Title: Re: Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban |
14 Feb 2005 04:52:53 PM |
|
|
stoney wrote:
On 13 Feb 2005 18:58:13 -0800, "Fencingsax" <Christocbd@gmail.com>
wrote:
stoney wrote:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:17:58 GMT, phy <phy00x@yahoo.com> wrote:
"maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote:
Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban
The bad thing about stem cell research ban is that while US
scientists have
their hands tied, those in other countries are going to make all the
advances and those countries will be the ones to get all the
financial
benefits. Meanwhile the US will lose its place as the technical
powerhouse
of the world.
That's already underway.
We haven't really held that title for several decades now.
Unsurprising.
Hey! The US is the greatest country on earth and we saved the
world two times last century and everyone else is just jealous.
Oops, my inner propagandist came out. :)
--Jeff
--
It is only those who have neither
fired a shot nor heard the shrieks
and groans of the wounded who cry
aloud for blood, more vengeance, more
desolation. War is hell.
--William Tecumseh Sherman
In war, there are no unwounded soldiers.
--Jose Narosky
The urge to save humanity is almost
always a false front for the urge to
rule.
--H.L. Mencken
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban |
15 Feb 2005 11:04:23 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:52:53 -0500, Jeffrey Turner
<jturner@localnet.com> wrote:
stoney wrote:
On 13 Feb 2005 18:58:13 -0800, "Fencingsax" <Christocbd@gmail.com>
wrote:
stoney wrote:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:17:58 GMT, phy <phy00x@yahoo.com> wrote:
"maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote:
Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban
The bad thing about stem cell research ban is that while US
scientists have their hands tied, those in other countries are
going to make all the advances and those countries
will be the ones to get all the financial
benefits. Meanwhile the US will lose its place as the technical
powerhouse of the world.
That's already underway.
We haven't really held that title for several decades now.
Unsurprising.
Hey! The US is the greatest country on earth and we saved the
world two times last century and everyone else is just jealous.
Oops, my inner propagandist came out. :)
ACK! Lock him in, Jeff...lock him in! :)
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Klaus Hellnick" |
|
| Title: Re: Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban |
11 Feb 2005 07:14:08 AM |
|
|
maff wrote:
Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/11/national/11stem.html
By PAM BELLUCK
Gov. Mitt Romney, a Republican, wants to ban the creating of embryos
specifically for medical research.
This seems to be a big bait and switch. The headline babbles about a
ban on stem cell researh, while the article seems to deal with a ban
producing human embryos for experimentation.
Klaus
Massachusetts
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/847684bddc1a17ae
Stem cells
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/bd98dcae31a61a18
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris Thompson" |
|
| Title: Re: Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban |
11 Feb 2005 07:42:16 AM |
|
|
Klaus Hellnick <khellSPAMnick@houston.rr.com> wrote in
news:Ac2Pd.36877$uL5.2133@fe2.texas.rr.com:
maff wrote:
Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/11/national/11stem.html
By PAM BELLUCK
Gov. Mitt Romney, a Republican, wants to ban the creating of embryos
specifically for medical research.
This seems to be a big bait and switch. The headline babbles about a
ban on stem cell researh, while the article seems to deal with a ban
producing human embryos for experimentation.
Klaus
Yeah, well, the ones against stem-cell research are as well known for
their honesty and "fair and balanced treatment" as creationists, aren't
they?
Chris
Massachusetts
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/847684bddc1a17ae
Stem cells
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/bd98dcae31a61a18
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban |
11 Feb 2005 08:56:08 AM |
|
|
Chris Thompson <rockwallaby@REMOVEhotmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FA588A067E9rockwallabyREMOVEhot@207.69.189.191:
Klaus Hellnick <khellSPAMnick@houston.rr.com> wrote in
news:Ac2Pd.36877$uL5.2133@fe2.texas.rr.com:
maff wrote:
Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/11/national/11stem.html
By PAM BELLUCK
Gov. Mitt Romney, a Republican, wants to ban the creating of embryos
specifically for medical research.
This seems to be a big bait and switch. The headline babbles about a
ban on stem cell researh, while the article seems to deal with a ban
producing human embryos for experimentation.
Klaus
Yeah, well, the ones against stem-cell research are as well known for
their honesty and "fair and balanced treatment" as creationists,
aren't they?
What does that have to do with the lies the Democrats are telling?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Where am I to go, now that I've gone too far?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris Thompson" |
|
| Title: Re: Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban |
11 Feb 2005 12:48:27 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FA651C3E340fstone69@205.188.138.161:
Chris Thompson <rockwallaby@REMOVEhotmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FA588A067E9rockwallabyREMOVEhot@207.69.189.191:
Klaus Hellnick <khellSPAMnick@houston.rr.com> wrote in
news:Ac2Pd.36877$uL5.2133@fe2.texas.rr.com:
maff wrote:
Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/11/national/11stem.html
By PAM BELLUCK
Gov. Mitt Romney, a Republican, wants to ban the creating of
embryos specifically for medical research.
This seems to be a big bait and switch. The headline babbles about
a ban on stem cell researh, while the article seems to deal with a
ban producing human embryos for experimentation.
Klaus
Yeah, well, the ones against stem-cell research are as well known for
their honesty and "fair and balanced treatment" as creationists,
aren't they?
What does that have to do with the lies the Democrats are telling?
Little touchy, there. Who said anything about Democrats?
Take the blue pills, Fred. They keep the paranoid blues away.
Chris
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban |
11 Feb 2005 02:10:54 PM |
|
|
Chris Thompson <rockwallaby@REMOVEhotmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FA8C729208ArockwallabyREMOVEhot@207.69.189.191:
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FA651C3E340fstone69@205.188.138.161:
Chris Thompson <rockwallaby@REMOVEhotmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FA588A067E9rockwallabyREMOVEhot@207.69.189.191:
Klaus Hellnick <khellSPAMnick@houston.rr.com> wrote in
news:Ac2Pd.36877$uL5.2133@fe2.texas.rr.com:
maff wrote:
Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/11/national/11stem.html
By PAM BELLUCK
Gov. Mitt Romney, a Republican, wants to ban the creating of
embryos specifically for medical research.
This seems to be a big bait and switch. The headline babbles about
a ban on stem cell researh, while the article seems to deal with a
ban producing human embryos for experimentation.
Klaus
Yeah, well, the ones against stem-cell research are as well known
for their honesty and "fair and balanced treatment" as creationists,
aren't they?
What does that have to do with the lies the Democrats are telling?
Little touchy, there. Who said anything about Democrats?
Somebody said something about Republicans.
Take the blue pills, Fred. They keep the paranoid blues away.
See this mirror?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Where am I to go, now that I've gone too far?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris Thompson" |
|
| Title: Re: Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban |
11 Feb 2005 04:15:47 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FA9A7BE28BBfstone69@205.188.138.161:
Chris Thompson <rockwallaby@REMOVEhotmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FA8C729208ArockwallabyREMOVEhot@207.69.189.191:
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FA651C3E340fstone69@205.188.138.161:
Chris Thompson <rockwallaby@REMOVEhotmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FA588A067E9rockwallabyREMOVEhot@207.69.189.191:
Klaus Hellnick <khellSPAMnick@houston.rr.com> wrote in
news:Ac2Pd.36877$uL5.2133@fe2.texas.rr.com:
maff wrote:
Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/11/national/11stem.html
By PAM BELLUCK
Gov. Mitt Romney, a Republican, wants to ban the creating of
embryos specifically for medical research.
This seems to be a big bait and switch. The headline babbles
about a ban on stem cell researh, while the article seems to deal
with a ban producing human embryos for experimentation.
Klaus
Yeah, well, the ones against stem-cell research are as well known
for their honesty and "fair and balanced treatment" as
creationists, aren't they?
What does that have to do with the lies the Democrats are telling?
Little touchy, there. Who said anything about Democrats?
Somebody said something about Republicans.
Take the blue pills, Fred. They keep the paranoid blues away.
See this mirror?
Someone? Somewhere? Sometime? That seems to have been in the article; I
didn't say it.
Get your attributions straight.
Or don't, and be thought a total bonehead; makes no difference to me.
Chris
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban |
11 Feb 2005 04:54:31 PM |
|
|
Chris Thompson <rockwallaby@REMOVEhotmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FAAF9987FB9rockwallabyREMOVEhot@207.69.189.191:
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FA9A7BE28BBfstone69@205.188.138.161:
Chris Thompson <rockwallaby@REMOVEhotmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FA8C729208ArockwallabyREMOVEhot@207.69.189.191:
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FA651C3E340fstone69@205.188.138.161:
Chris Thompson <rockwallaby@REMOVEhotmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FA588A067E9rockwallabyREMOVEhot@207.69.189.191:
Klaus Hellnick <khellSPAMnick@houston.rr.com> wrote in
news:Ac2Pd.36877$uL5.2133@fe2.texas.rr.com:
maff wrote:
Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/11/national/11stem.html
By PAM BELLUCK
Gov. Mitt Romney, a Republican, wants to ban the creating of
embryos specifically for medical research.
This seems to be a big bait and switch. The headline babbles
about a ban on stem cell researh, while the article seems to deal
with a ban producing human embryos for experimentation.
Klaus
Yeah, well, the ones against stem-cell research are as well known
for their honesty and "fair and balanced treatment" as
creationists, aren't they?
What does that have to do with the lies the Democrats are telling?
Little touchy, there. Who said anything about Democrats?
Somebody said something about Republicans.
Take the blue pills, Fred. They keep the paranoid blues away.
See this mirror?
Someone? Somewhere? Sometime? That seems to have been in the article;
I didn't say it.
Who gives a *****?
Get your attributions straight.
I got them straight. You're the hypocrite who tried to change the
subject.
Or don't, and be thought a total bonehead; makes no difference to me.
What's the subject of this thread again? Why don't *you* pay attention
instead of calling me names? And why can't you just answer the question?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Where am I to go, now that I've gone too far?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris Thompson" |
|
| Title: Re: Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban |
11 Feb 2005 08:07:10 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FAB639C4070fstone69@205.188.138.161:
Chris Thompson <rockwallaby@REMOVEhotmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FAAF9987FB9rockwallabyREMOVEhot@207.69.189.191:
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FA9A7BE28BBfstone69@205.188.138.161:
Chris Thompson <rockwallaby@REMOVEhotmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FA8C729208ArockwallabyREMOVEhot@207.69.189.191:
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FA651C3E340fstone69@205.188.138.161:
Chris Thompson <rockwallaby@REMOVEhotmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FA588A067E9rockwallabyREMOVEhot@207.69.189.191:
Klaus Hellnick <khellSPAMnick@houston.rr.com> wrote in
news:Ac2Pd.36877$uL5.2133@fe2.texas.rr.com:
maff wrote:
Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/11/national/11stem.html
By PAM BELLUCK
Gov. Mitt Romney, a Republican, wants to ban the creating of
embryos specifically for medical research.
This seems to be a big bait and switch. The headline babbles
about a ban on stem cell researh, while the article seems to
deal with a ban producing human embryos for experimentation.
Klaus
Yeah, well, the ones against stem-cell research are as well known
for their honesty and "fair and balanced treatment" as
creationists, aren't they?
What does that have to do with the lies the Democrats are telling?
Little touchy, there. Who said anything about Democrats?
Somebody said something about Republicans.
Take the blue pills, Fred. They keep the paranoid blues away.
See this mirror?
Someone? Somewhere? Sometime? That seems to have been in the article;
I didn't say it.
Who gives a *****?
Evidently not you, for quite some time. It seems to have backed up into
your cranium.
Get your attributions straight.
I got them straight. You're the hypocrite who tried to change the
subject.
Wrong again. The article is about banning the harvest of stem cells from
human embryos. It seems to be in a rabidly pro-life publication for whom
any stem cell research is off limits. They present half-truths and
fallacies as fact.
Or don't, and be thought a total bonehead; makes no difference to me.
What's the subject of this thread again? Why don't *you* pay attention
instead of calling me names? And why can't you just answer the
question?
The subject of my post was the article calling for a ban on stem cell
research. What's yours?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban |
11 Feb 2005 09:07:57 PM |
|
|
Chris Thompson <rockwallaby@REMOVEhotmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FAD6D40BA2rockwallabyREMOVEhot@207.69.189.191:
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FAB639C4070fstone69@205.188.138.161:
Chris Thompson <rockwallaby@REMOVEhotmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FAAF9987FB9rockwallabyREMOVEhot@207.69.189.191:
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FA9A7BE28BBfstone69@205.188.138.161:
Chris Thompson <rockwallaby@REMOVEhotmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FA8C729208ArockwallabyREMOVEhot@207.69.189.191:
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FA651C3E340fstone69@205.188.138.161:
Chris Thompson <rockwallaby@REMOVEhotmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FA588A067E9rockwallabyREMOVEhot@207.69.189.191:
Klaus Hellnick <khellSPAMnick@houston.rr.com> wrote in
news:Ac2Pd.36877$uL5.2133@fe2.texas.rr.com:
maff wrote:
Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/11/national/11stem.html
By PAM BELLUCK
Gov. Mitt Romney, a Republican, wants to ban the creating of
embryos specifically for medical research.
This seems to be a big bait and switch. The headline babbles
about a ban on stem cell researh, while the article seems to
deal with a ban producing human embryos for experimentation.
Klaus
Yeah, well, the ones against stem-cell research are as well
known for their honesty and "fair and balanced treatment" as
creationists, aren't they?
What does that have to do with the lies the Democrats are
telling?
Little touchy, there. Who said anything about Democrats?
Somebody said something about Republicans.
Take the blue pills, Fred. They keep the paranoid blues away.
See this mirror?
Someone? Somewhere? Sometime? That seems to have been in the
article; I didn't say it.
Who gives a *****?
Evidently not you, for quite some time. It seems to have backed up
into your cranium.
You wouldn't know, you've been full of ***** for so long you think it
smells good.
Get your attributions straight.
I got them straight. You're the hypocrite who tried to change the
subject.
Wrong again. The article is about banning the harvest of stem cells
from human embryos. It seems to be in a rabidly pro-life publication
for whom any stem cell research is off limits. They present
half-truths and fallacies as fact.
And I quote:
This seems to be a big bait and switch. The headline babbles
about a ban on stem cell researh, while the article seems to
deal with a ban producing human embryos for experimentation.
Klaus
Yeah, well, the ones against stem-cell research are as well
known for their honesty and "fair and balanced treatment" as
creationists, aren't they?
So run away. Go ahead, run!
Or don't, and be thought a total bonehead; makes no difference to
me.
What's the subject of this thread again? Why don't *you* pay
attention instead of calling me names? And why can't you just answer
the question?
The subject of my post was the article calling for a ban on stem cell
research. What's yours?
That *you* tried to change the subject from the bait-and-switch in the
article you posted.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Where am I to go, now that I've gone too far?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris Thompson" |
|
| Title: Re: Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban |
12 Feb 2005 07:24:36 AM |
|
|
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FAE133082C3fstone69@205.188.138.161:
Chris Thompson <rockwallaby@REMOVEhotmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FAD6D40BA2rockwallabyREMOVEhot@207.69.189.191:
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FAB639C4070fstone69@205.188.138.161:
Chris Thompson <rockwallaby@REMOVEhotmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FAAF9987FB9rockwallabyREMOVEhot@207.69.189.191:
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FA9A7BE28BBfstone69@205.188.138.161:
Chris Thompson <rockwallaby@REMOVEhotmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FA8C729208ArockwallabyREMOVEhot@207.69.189.191:
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FA651C3E340fstone69@205.188.138.161:
Chris Thompson <rockwallaby@REMOVEhotmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FA588A067E9rockwallabyREMOVEhot@207.69.189.191:
Klaus Hellnick <khellSPAMnick@houston.rr.com> wrote in
news:Ac2Pd.36877$uL5.2133@fe2.texas.rr.com:
maff wrote:
Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/11/national/11stem.html
By PAM BELLUCK
Gov. Mitt Romney, a Republican, wants to ban the creating of
embryos specifically for medical research.
This seems to be a big bait and switch. The headline babbles
about a ban on stem cell researh, while the article seems to
deal with a ban producing human embryos for experimentation.
Klaus
Yeah, well, the ones against stem-cell research are as well
known for their honesty and "fair and balanced treatment" as
creationists, aren't they?
What does that have to do with the lies the Democrats are
telling?
Little touchy, there. Who said anything about Democrats?
Somebody said something about Republicans.
Take the blue pills, Fred. They keep the paranoid blues away.
See this mirror?
Someone? Somewhere? Sometime? That seems to have been in the
article; I didn't say it.
Who gives a *****?
Evidently not you, for quite some time. It seems to have backed up
into your cranium.
You wouldn't know, you've been full of ***** for so long you think it
smells good.
Get your attributions straight.
I got them straight. You're the hypocrite who tried to change the
subject.
Wrong again. The article is about banning the harvest of stem cells
from human embryos. It seems to be in a rabidly pro-life publication
for whom any stem cell research is off limits. They present
half-truths and fallacies as fact.
And I quote:
This seems to be a big bait and switch. The headline babbles
about a ban on stem cell researh, while the article seems to
deal with a ban producing human embryos for experimentation.
Klaus
Yeah, well, the ones against stem-cell research are as well
known for their honesty and "fair and balanced treatment" as
creationists, aren't they?
So run away. Go ahead, run!
Um Fred, there's nothing in there about Republicans or Democrats.
You're weirding me out, pal. I still don't see where you got that from.
Chris
Or don't, and be thought a total bonehead; makes no difference to
me.
What's the subject of this thread again? Why don't *you* pay
attention instead of calling me names? And why can't you just answer
the question?
The subject of my post was the article calling for a ban on stem cell
research. What's yours?
That *you* tried to change the subject from the bait-and-switch in the
article you posted.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban |
13 Feb 2005 08:16:05 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:24:36 GMT, Chris Thompson
<rockwallaby@REMOVEhotmail.com> wrote:
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FAE133082C3fstone69@205.188.138.161:
Chris Thompson <rockwallaby@REMOVEhotmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FAD6D40BA2rockwallabyREMOVEhot@207.69.189.191:
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FAB639C4070fstone69@205.188.138.161:
[]
And I quote:
This seems to be a big bait and switch. The headline babbles
about a ban on stem cell researh, while the article seems to
deal with a ban producing human embryos for experimentation.
Klaus
Yeah, well, the ones against stem-cell research are as well
known for their honesty and "fair and balanced treatment" as
creationists, aren't they?
So run away. Go ahead, run!
Um Fred, there's nothing in there about Republicans or Democrats.
You're weirding me out, pal. I still don't see where you got that from.
He pulls it out of his *****.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban |
11 Feb 2005 07:54:22 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:42:16 GMT, Chris Thompson
<rockwallaby@REMOVEhotmail.com> said in alt.atheism:
Yeah, well, the ones against stem-cell research are as well known for
their honesty and "fair and balanced treatment" as creationists, aren't
they?
They aren't the same sheeple?
--
Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise
as false, and by the rulers as useful."
- Seneca the Younger
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris Thompson" |
|
| Title: Re: Massachusetts Democrats Object to Stem Cell Research Ban |
11 Feb 2005 08:07:31 PM |
|
|
Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in
news:qdoq01dtabd08pg5rfvd64m1oocje2pr5a@4ax.com:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:42:16 GMT, Chris Thompson
<rockwallaby@REMOVEhotmail.com> said in alt.atheism:
Yeah, well, the ones against stem-cell research are as well known for
their honesty and "fair and balanced treatment" as creationists, aren't
they?
They aren't the same sheeple?
Not always.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
