http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/09/14/bush_service/index.html

Unwitting Drudge indicts Bush
A 1968 document from the president's military file, posted on the
Internet, merely reminds us of how far short he fell in fulfilling his
service commitments.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Eric Boehlert



Sept. 14, 2004 | Attempting to bolster President Bush as he
continues to stonewall questions about his Texas Air National Guard
service, Internet gossip Matt Drudge posted a 1968 document from
Bush's military personnel file Monday afternoon that purports to
buttress a long-ago claim by Bush that he served not only in the Texas
Air National Guard but in the Air Force as well. Although this
"exclusive" Drudge posting is a trivial sidebar to the larger story of
Bush's absence from two years of military service, the document itself
-- presumably provided to Drudge by a Republican operative -- turns
out to be an incriminating piece of evidence against Bush's case.

The Air Force claim arose in 1978, when Bush ran unsuccessfully for
the House of Representatives from west Texas. During the campaign he
produced literature in which he said he had served in the Air Force as
well as the Texas Air National Guard. Pressed by the Associated Press
about the claim two decades later in 1999, Bush's spokeswoman, handler
and biographer, Karen Hughes, insisted the assertion was accurate. Her
explanation: As part of his 1968 training to become a Guard pilot,
Bush served 120 days of active duty; therefore he served in the Air
Force.

The signed document Drudge posted is titled "Statement of
Understanding" and dated May 27, 1968, the day Bush joined the Guard.
Among the stipulations Bush agreed to was entering "active duty for
training for 120 days," bolstering Bush's later assertion about the
Air Force. But a Pentagon spokesperson told the A.P. in 1999 that
despite their four-month training, Air National Guard members are not
counted as members of the active-duty Air Force.

Bush's 1978 assertion that he served in the Air Force is "an
embellishment, but not a lie," one former Air Force pilot says. Yet
the story soon disappeared from Bush's official biography -- perhaps
the best indication of his camp's recognition that the Air Force claim
stretched credulity. (Not that the story of his military life then
grew more accurate: During the 2000 campaign, Bush's official bio,
scrubbed and rewritten by Hughes, said he flew F-102 planes in the
Guard until 1973. Of course, that's untrue: Bush walked away from
flying in 1972 never to return, an event he has yet to explain.)

Like the White House aides who in February released a portion of
Bush's military payroll records under media pressure without fully
understanding the incriminating evidence embedded in their military
coding -- information that has come back to haunt Bush -- Drudge, by
posting Bush's 1968 signed statement, merely reminds people how far
short of fulfilling his military requirement the president fell.

For example, in his 1968 statement, Bush pledged to maintain
"satisfactory participation" with his Guard unit, which meant
fulfilling "satisfactory performance of assigned duties at 48
scheduled inactive duty training period days and 15 days filed
training annually." Failure to do so meant being transferred to active
duty, and the possibility of being sent to Vietnam. But in both 1972
and 1973, Bush failed to meet that participation standard.

White House aides have pointed out that while Bush may have missed
some mandatory drill dates, he made them up later, earning enough
annual points for a satisfactory rating. But the makeup points he
earned -- some of which appear to be highly dubious -- counted only
toward his retirement benefits, not his participation ratings.

What's more, those points were based on a calendar year, from January
to December, while the "satisfactory participation" requirement was
based on the military's fiscal year, from July to June. And according
to the Bush records released by the White House, he failed to meet the
required "48 scheduled inactive duty training period days" in both
1972 and 1973. Bush showed up for duty so infrequently during those
two years that his commanders couldn't complete mandatory annual
ratings of his service. Yet the son of a prominent political father
faced no disciplinary action.

Also interesting is that on the same day Bush enlisted, May 27, 1968,
he also signed a statement listing the penalties for poor attendance
and unsatisfactory participation, such as "subject to active duty for
a period not to exceed a total of 24 months." His commitment, however,
did not stop Bush from failing to attend months of required drills in
1972 and 1973. The document is publicly available. Republicans just
haven't given it to Drudge to post.




-----

Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec

The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: -3 million jobs and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1014 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting

Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless