| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Thurston Phoremost" |
| Date: |
17 Oct 2003 03:01:10 AM |
| Object: |
Maybe these Xtians are useful after all? |
Department of Credit Where Credit Due Dept?
http://www.gospelcom.net/moh/WinkPrat/DTM/ContractOnChildrenPart2.htm
(...)
Yet a protected childhood is a relatively new thing, introduced by
Christian reformers. Only a century ago, children in England were made
to work in coal mines because they were considered the only ones with
bones flexible enough for the horrifying conditions. Imagine the
terror of their days in the mine shafts.
Human Flesh Was Cheaper
The simplest job was being a "trapper." A child was lowered 50 feet
down a shaft to squat in the mud in total darkness with trickling
water, beetles, and rats, waiting to open the trap door for other
children pulling coal cars. He would let the coal through and then
close the trap door again. That way, if there was a mine explosion, it
only killed the children between the doors. The trap doors cut off the
exploding gas from spreading further. Little children, seven or eight
years old, would sit in the dark every day, sometimes 18 to 20 hours,
listening for the coal cars. Some went insane. Yet in the mines, that
was the best job.
The children suffered terrible cruelty at the hands of adults, who
bargained for them, used them, and dismissed them as they pleased.
Many working underground were only eight or nine years old, girls as
well as boys. Some began toiling in the pits when they were only four
or five. They only saw the sun on Sundays. There were no hours of
relaxation, their meals were mostly eaten in the dark, and they lived
with parents who devoted them to this life.
Think about the actual pulling of the coal cars. Women or small
children had to crawl on their hands and knees dragging enormous
weights along narrow passageways that were only 18 to 24 inches in
height, and were as wet and slimy as common sewers. Women remained at
this work until the last hour of pregnancy. Boys and girls performed
the work by using a girdle and chain. A girdle was put around their
naked waist. A chain from the carriage was hooked to the girdle and
passed between their legs. Crawling on hands and knees they drew the
carriages after them.
"It is not necessary to describe," says Shaftesbury, the Christian
politician who fought against this horror for most of his life, "how
their sides were blistered, their ankles stained, their backs chafed
from rubbing against the roofs, or how they stumbled in the darkness
and choked in the stifling atmosphere. It is enough to say they were
obliged to do the work of horses or other beasts of the field, only
because human flesh and blood was cheaper in some cases and horse
labor was impossible in others."
(...)
.
|
|
| User: "Thurston Phoremost" |
|
| Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism |
02 Nov 2003 06:53:39 AM |
|
|
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message news:<8vr8qv0nrmkomc3hj9tlvdhmnin1k89scv@4ax.com>...
Lo, many moons past, on 1 Nov 2003 14:28:02 -0800, a stranger called
by some (Thurston Phoremost) came
forth and told this tale in alt.atheism
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message news:<agr7qvos3l6enkklvgch43i3pd4rn7uo5u@4ax.com>...
No trouble at all, softcock. You posted it, and it's there on Google.
OK, find one. You are the one making the claim, after all.
My pleasure.
----------
From: William Klee <fnord2k@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.atheism
Subject: Re: Maybe these Xtians are useful after all?
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 10:23:57 -0500
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <181020031023573322%fnord2k@yahoo.com>
(...)
---------
You're welcome.
The total message as written by Mr. Klee:
"One of, if not the, greatest christian impulses: greed. Raw, naked
greed."
He did not say that all Christians are motivated by greed alone.
That's right, he didn't. And I never said that he did.
Just
that oneof, perhaps the largest motivation was greed. And having
watched televangelists at work, I find myself in agreement
I'm in agreement too.
But other than that, do you have a point to make?
T.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism |
31 Oct 2003 03:10:14 PM |
|
|
Lo, many moons past, on 31 Oct 2003 12:01:54 -0800, a stranger called
by some (Thurston Phoremost) came
forth and told this tale in alt.atheism
FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism
- #1 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
Nonsense. Name one time a Jew has come in here and called us name,
demand that we convert, and generally acted like an *****.
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Thurston Phoremost" |
|
| Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism |
31 Oct 2003 10:46:41 PM |
|
|
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message news:<nsj5qv4ukansk8bhmpgvre4aremg1b5600@4ax.com>...
Lo, many moons past, on 31 Oct 2003 12:01:54 -0800, a stranger called
by some (Thurston Phoremost) came
forth and told this tale in alt.atheism
FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism
- #1 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
Nonsense. Name one time a Jew has come in here and called us name,
demand that we convert, and generally acted like an *****.
You need to wake up to the fact that jew$ the world over are doing far
worse things than posting abuse in this shitty little newsgroup.
If (or should I say WHEN) the jew$ get their way, neither you nor I
will be able to criticize them, either in this newsgroup or anywhere
else.
The christians would like to kill off free speech, too, but they tried
and failed, they just didn't have what it takes. Sure, they succeeded
for a time, but look at them now. Christians today are rapidly
becoming little more than anachronistic objects of ridicule all
throughout the educated, civilized world (that is to say, all
throughout the western world except the USA).
The Jew$ though... they're smarter, and meaner. They just might
succeed where the xtians have failed.
T.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism |
01 Nov 2003 11:41:17 AM |
|
|
Lo, many moons past, on 31 Oct 2003 20:46:41 -0800, a stranger called
by some (Thurston Phoremost) came
forth and told this tale in alt.atheism
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message news:<nsj5qv4ukansk8bhmpgvre4aremg1b5600@4ax.com>...
Lo, many moons past, on 31 Oct 2003 12:01:54 -0800, a stranger called
by some (Thurston Phoremost) came
forth and told this tale in alt.atheism
FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism
- #1 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
Nonsense. Name one time a Jew has come in here and called us name,
demand that we convert, and generally acted like an *****.
You need to wake up to the fact that jew$ the world over are doing far
worse things than posting abuse in this shitty little newsgroup.
If (or should I say WHEN) the jew$ get their way, neither you nor I
will be able to criticize them, either in this newsgroup or anywhere
else.
World-wide, Jews make up less than one-tenth of one percent of the
population. Exceuse me if I'm not overly concerned.
Then there is the fact that you sound like you are owrking off the
Protocols of the Elders of Zion. A known forgery and plagerized off
two earlier works - word for word in places. No evidence has ever
been brought forward to support the Protocols. Hisorically, since the
Romans kicked butt on Jerusalem, Jews have been a minority everywhere
they go.
Ihm know why they are such figures in banking and finacem historically
speaking? Because in the 10th Centurty the Pope forbid charging
interest on loans or profting from money-changing. Since no Christian
could make moeny on those professions except the Jews, guess who took
over the industry?
The christians would like to kill off free speech, too, but they tried
and failed, they just didn't have what it takes. Sure, they succeeded
for a time, but look at them now. Christians today are rapidly
becoming little more than anachronistic objects of ridicule all
throughout the educated, civilized world (that is to say, all
throughout the western world except the USA).
The Jew$ though... they're smarter, and meaner. They just might
succeed where the xtians have failed.
So you admit they are stronger, smarter, better equipped to run
things? I mean if such a tiny fraction of humanity is so well
equipped to run things, why not give them a shot?
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Thurston Phoremost" |
|
| Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism |
01 Nov 2003 04:17:05 PM |
|
|
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message news:<clr7qv0uod6routjjvh0rebb3m9t4rh44j@4ax.com>...
Lo, many moons past, on 31 Oct 2003 20:46:41 -0800, a stranger called
by some (Thurston Phoremost) came
forth and told this tale in alt.atheism
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message news:<nsj5qv4ukansk8bhmpgvre4aremg1b5600@4ax.com>...
Lo, many moons past, on 31 Oct 2003 12:01:54 -0800, a stranger called
by some (Thurston Phoremost) came
forth and told this tale in alt.atheism
FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism
- #1 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
Nonsense. Name one time a Jew has come in here and called us name,
demand that we convert, and generally acted like an *****.
You need to wake up to the fact that jew$ the world over are doing far
worse things than posting abuse in this shitty little newsgroup.
If (or should I say WHEN) the jew$ get their way, neither you nor I
will be able to criticize them, either in this newsgroup or anywhere
else.
World-wide, Jews make up less than one-tenth of one percent of the
population. Exceuse me if I'm not overly concerned.
Well, all I can say is that you are very naieve if you think that
their small numbers make them less of a threat.
Saddam Hussein and his sons made up less than one-tenth of one percent
of the
population of Iraq. Does this mean that they were not dangerous?
If I wasn't worried about invoking Godwin's Law of the Usenet, I would
also have pointed out that Hitler and Himmler and Goebbels made up
less than one-tenth of one percent of the population of Germany,
nevertheless, they were dangerous too.
But I won't.
Instead, I'll just hope that you have the mental capacity to realize
how stupid it is to say that the jew$ are not dangerous due to their
comparatively small numbers.
Then there is the fact that you sound like you are owrking off the
Protocols of the Elders of Zion. A known forgery and plagerized off
two earlier works - word for word in places.
Imitation being the sincerest form of flattery, yes?
No evidence has ever
been brought forward to support the Protocols.
Open your eyes, man. The jew$ control the media, the "entertainment"
industry, and everything else of importance, and they use these
powerful institutions in exactly the same way as is described in the
"protocols".
Hisorically, since the
Romans kicked butt on Jerusalem, Jews have been a minority everywhere
they go.
See my comments above re this "minority" thang.
Ihm know why they are such figures in banking and finacem historically
speaking? Because in the 10th Centurty the Pope forbid charging
interest on loans or profting from money-changing.
That, and the fact that Jew$ are very greedy.
Since no Christian
could make moeny on those professions except the Jews, guess who took
over the industry?
The Pope must have been very wise, he knew that the greed of the Jew$
would insure that the capitalist system would thrive and grow with the
jew$ running it.
The christians would like to kill off free speech, too, but they tried
and failed, they just didn't have what it takes. Sure, they succeeded
for a time, but look at them now. Christians today are rapidly
becoming little more than anachronistic objects of ridicule all
throughout the educated, civilized world (that is to say, all
throughout the western world except the USA).
The Jew$ though... they're smarter, and meaner. They just might
succeed where the xtians have failed.
So you admit they are stronger, smarter,
Absolutely. Without doubt.
better equipped to run
things?
Most definitely *NOT*!
See below.
I mean if such a tiny fraction of humanity is so well
equipped to run things, why not give them a shot?
For the simple reason that the jew$ worship and admire the most
viscious god that man has ever created, and they use that god to
justify all manner of violent acts against non-jew$.
Is there in this world a less suitable and more dangerous bunch of
people to run a world-wide theocratic dictatorship than the jew$?
Maybe there is, but I can't think of one.
Douglas, I like it when we are having a discussion, rather than just
insulting each other.
Let's do it again soon.
T.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism |
01 Nov 2003 08:42:31 PM |
|
|
Lo, many moons past, on 1 Nov 2003 14:17:05 -0800, a stranger called
by some (Thurston Phoremost) came
forth and told this tale in alt.atheism
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message news:<clr7qv0uod6routjjvh0rebb3m9t4rh44j@4ax.com>...
World-wide, Jews make up less than one-tenth of one percent of the
population. Exceuse me if I'm not overly concerned.
Well, all I can say is that you are very naieve if you think that
their small numbers make them less of a threat.
Small numbers, being spread all over the world, yeah, not much of a
threat.
Saddam Hussein and his sons made up less than one-tenth of one percent
of the
population of Iraq. Does this mean that they were not dangerous?
They were also in a position of power, and you are wrong. The Ba'ath
Party stalwarts were about 5% of the population.
If I wasn't worried about invoking Godwin's Law of the Usenet, I would
also have pointed out that Hitler and Himmler and Goebbels made up
less than one-tenth of one percent of the population of Germany,
nevertheless, they were dangerous too.
You seem to forget that Hitler was elected to power. By a majority.
But I won't.
Nice try.
Instead, I'll just hope that you have the mental capacity to realize
how stupid it is to say that the jew$ are not dangerous due to their
comparatively small numbers.
"Comparatively" nothing. Less than one tenth of one percent! For
every thousand humans on Earth you find less than one Jew.
Then there is the fact that you sound like you are owrking off the
Protocols of the Elders of Zion. A known forgery and plagerized off
two earlier works - word for word in places.
Imitation being the sincerest form of flattery, yes?
No, imitation is not what we are talking about. The Protocols are
based on two documents. "Biarritz" by Hermann Goedsche (1868) an
anti-semitc novel which features the Prague graveyard meeting with the
Devil, and "Dialogue aux Enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu"
("Dialogue in Hell between Machiavelli and Montesquieu"), an
anti-Masonic attack on Napolean III published in 1864 tract published
in Paris. The Okhrana, the Czar's secret police, pieced the two
together and re-wrote it as a factual document. Then released through
connections in the fanaticaly pro-monarchy segements of the Russian
Orthodox Church. It was used to justify pogroms against Jews. Czar
Nicholas himself denounced the book.
These are all facts. You can look them up. I can provide a ready
list, and in a very good library you can probably find Biarritz. Not
sure if it has been translated recently, though.
No evidence has ever
been brought forward to support the Protocols.
Open your eyes, man. The jew$ control the media, the "entertainment"
industry, and everything else of importance, and they use these
powerful institutions in exactly the same way as is described in the
"protocols".
Proof? Real, hard proof. Not "look at this list of Jewish sounding
names!
Ted Turner is a media mogul. Is he Jewish?
Rupert Murdoch?
The Hearst family?
Hisorically, since the
Romans kicked butt on Jerusalem, Jews have been a minority everywhere
they go.
See my comments above re this "minority" thang.
They've also been oppresed, kept poor, and purged on a regular basis.
Know why they are such figures in banking and finace, historically
speaking? Because in the 10th Centurty the Pope forbid charging
interest on loans or profting from money-changing.
That, and the fact that Jew$ are very greedy.
As opposed to people in the S&L scandel? Charles Keating, for
example? How about Jim and Tammy Baker? Show me a definable,
measurable sense of greed between religions.
Since no Christian
could make money on those professions except the Jews, guess who took
over the industry?
The Pope must have been very wise, he knew that the greed of the Jew$
would insure that the capitalist system would thrive and grow with the
jew$ running it.
ROTFLMAO!!! You dimwit! This was the *10TH CENTYRY!!* Capitalism
was barely a gleam on the horizon. 90 percent of Europe was still on
the barter economy. The only people with money was the nobility and
the church. The middle class, and capitalism didn't arrive until the
Black Death destroyed the underpinings of medieval society and created
a new middle class, and with it the ability to support large-scale
trade in the 14th century, by which time a Pope had cahnged the rules
again. By that time, severl Jewish families had become rich, and
diversified.
The Jew$ though... they're smarter, and meaner. They just might
succeed where the xtians have failed.
So you admit they are stronger, smarter,
Absolutely. Without doubt.
better equipped to run
things?
Most definitely *NOT*!
See below.
I mean if such a tiny fraction of humanity is so well
equipped to run things, why not give them a shot?
For the simple reason that the jew$ worship and admire the most
viscious god that man has ever created, and they use that god to
justify all manner of violent acts against non-jew$.
This would be the exact same god who sent his son to earth. Right?
Or am i missing a god here. Last time I checked, my copy of the King
James Version has the Olt Testament in there.
Is there in this world a less suitable and more dangerous bunch of
people to run a world-wide theocratic dictatorship than the jew$?
Well, me. You wouldn;t like me.
But in Israel today, everyone is free to worship as they please. I've
been there bunky. I know. Try praying toawrds mecca in St. Peter's
Square sometime.
Douglas, I like it when we are having a discussion, rather than just
insulting each other.
Let's do it again soon.
As you wish.
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Thurston Phoremost" |
|
| Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism |
04 Nov 2003 06:01:38 AM |
|
|
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message news:<56q8qvc81o9ml5p2b5j8e2a5deglre0d6p@4ax.com>...
Lo, many moons past, on 1 Nov 2003 14:17:05 -0800, a stranger called
by some (Thurston Phoremost) came
forth and told this tale in alt.atheism
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message news:<clr7qv0uod6routjjvh0rebb3m9t4rh44j@4ax.com>...
World-wide, Jews make up less than one-tenth of one percent of the
population. Exceuse me if I'm not overly concerned.
Well, all I can say is that you are very naieve if you think that
their small numbers make them less of a threat.
Small numbers, being spread all over the world, yeah, not much of a
threat.
But then, you aren't actually being honest here, are you, when you try
to put across the idea that jews are evenly distributed across the
world.
Sure, if they were evenly distributed, they would be far less of a
threat.
For example, in China (the most highly populated country) you could
probably count the number of jews on one hand. Same with India, and
Indonesia. Well, there's the three of the largest countries in the
world in terms of population, and nary a jew in sight.
Even in the USA, we don't see jews evenly spread. They tend to
congregate where the movers and shakers and moneymen congregate,
places such as Hollywood and New York City. (In fact, there are so
many Jews in NYC that it's been nicknamed Jew York City).
Saddam Hussein and his sons made up less than one-tenth of one percent
of the
population of Iraq. Does this mean that they were not dangerous?
They were also in a position of power,
That's what made them dangerous, and it's what makes the Jews
dangerous too.
and you are wrong.
Nope, sorry.
The Ba'ath
Party stalwarts were about 5% of the population.
I'll (perhaps unwisely) take your word for that, but only because it's
irrelevant anyway.
If I wasn't worried about invoking Godwin's Law of the Usenet, I would
also have pointed out that Hitler and Himmler and Goebbels made up
less than one-tenth of one percent of the population of Germany,
nevertheless, they were dangerous too.
You seem to forget that Hitler was elected to power. By a majority.
What makes you think I forgot that? And, how is it relevant anyway?
Even if that winning election majority was 99.9%, it would not change
the truth of my statement that the person mentioned in Godwin's Law
was very dangerous, and that he and his co-conspirators were a small
minority.
But I won't.
Nice try.
Instead, I'll just hope that you have the mental capacity to realize
how stupid it is to say that the jew$ are not dangerous due to their
comparatively small numbers.
"Comparatively" nothing. Less than one tenth of one percent! For
every thousand humans on Earth you find less than one Jew.
In some parts of the world, it's probably less than 1 in a *million*
persons that is a jew.
But so what? What do you think this proves?
Then there is the fact that you sound like you are owrking off the
Protocols of the Elders of Zion. A known forgery and plagerized off
two earlier works - word for word in places.
Imitation being the sincerest form of flattery, yes?
No, imitation is not what we are talking about. The Protocols are
based on two documents. "Biarritz" by Hermann Goedsche (1868) an
anti-semitc novel which features the Prague graveyard meeting with the
Devil, and "Dialogue aux Enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu"
("Dialogue in Hell between Machiavelli and Montesquieu"), an
anti-Masonic attack on Napolean III published in 1864 tract published
in Paris. The Okhrana, the Czar's secret police, pieced the two
together and re-wrote it as a factual document. Then released through
connections in the fanaticaly pro-monarchy segements of the Russian
Orthodox Church. It was used to justify pogroms against Jews. Czar
Nicholas himself denounced the book.
These are all facts. You can look them up. I can provide a ready
list, and in a very good library you can probably find Biarritz. Not
sure if it has been translated recently, though.
No evidence has ever
been brought forward to support the Protocols.
Open your eyes, man. The jew$ control the media, the "entertainment"
industry, and everything else of importance, and they use these
powerful institutions in exactly the same way as is described in the
"protocols".
Proof? Real, hard proof. Not "look at this list of Jewish sounding
names!
Ted Turner is a media mogul. Is he Jewish?
He's not jewish, no. But he is not a media mogul either, nor has he
been for quite some years now.
Rupert Murdoch?
Actually, he is what's referred to as a Mamzer Jew.
No, it doesn't mean that his mam's a jew, but an educated man like you
is probably aware of that. :)
The Hearst family?
Well, I don't honestly know if they are jews or not (but again, [and
again perhaps unwisely] I'll take your word for it).
I know that they did once have media moguls in their family, but I'm
not sure how many are still alive and still in the business now
though, perhaps you can enlighten me. But only if you are reasonably
sure it's relevant.
But, again, what is your point here? Are you saying that this little
list of sorta-non-jewish or sorta-hasbeen or whatever alleged media
moguls is proof that there is no preponderance of jewish influence in
the western media?
Hisorically, since the
Romans kicked butt on Jerusalem, Jews have been a minority everywhere
they go.
See my comments above re this "minority" thang.
They've also been oppresed, kept poor, and purged on a regular basis.
And I am guessing that there are some pretty good reasons for that.
Know why they are such figures in banking and finace, historically
speaking? Because in the 10th Centurty the Pope forbid charging
interest on loans or profting from money-changing.
That, and the fact that Jew$ are very greedy.
As opposed to people in the S&L scandel?
No, rather I would say very similar to the people in the S&L scandal.
Charles Keating, for
example? How about Jim and Tammy Baker? Show me a definable,
measurable sense of greed between religions.
All religious freakoids are very partial to money, mainly because of
the power that it brings them. Religious freakoids are power junkies.
I include the Jewish religion in that. If that offends you, all I can
say is, Get Over It.
Since no Christian
could make money on those professions except the Jews, guess who took
over the industry?
The Pope must have been very wise, he knew that the greed of the Jew$
would insure that the capitalist system would thrive and grow with the
jew$ running it.
ROTFLMAO!!! You dimwit! This was the *10TH CENTYRY!!* Capitalism
was barely a gleam on the horizon. 90 percent of Europe was still on
the barter economy. The only people with money was the nobility and
the church.
ROTF, Rolling On The Floor. Well, you may roll on the floor all you
like, but when you dust yourself off I'm afraid you'll realize that
the laugh is on you. :)
Anywhere where there are goods & services, and people who desire those
goods & services, and a recognized and trusted currency that can be
spent and/or accumulated or lent and/or borrowed - there you will find
capitalism.
The middle class, and capitalism didn't arrive until the
Black Death destroyed the underpinings of medieval society and created
a new middle class, and with it the ability to support large-scale
trade in the 14th century, by which time a Pope had cahnged the rules
again. By that time, severl Jewish families had become rich, and
diversified.
Well, all this is interesting, although only marginally relevant to
the discussion. And I'm amazed that you'd spend all that time and
typing defending the Jews against my devastatingly effective viscious
barbs and offensive taunts. :)
Which raises the question - would you be putting any effort at *all
into this if I had been criticizing Xtians instead of Jews? :)
The Jew$ though... they're smarter, and meaner. They just might
succeed where the xtians have failed.
So you admit they are stronger, smarter,
Absolutely. Without doubt.
better equipped to run
things?
Most definitely *NOT*!
See below.
I mean if such a tiny fraction of humanity is so well
equipped to run things, why not give them a shot?
For the simple reason that the jew$ worship and admire the most
viscious god that man has ever created, and they use that god to
justify all manner of violent acts against non-jew$.
This would be the exact same god who sent his son to earth. Right?
You raised a relevant point here (at long last) possibly without
realizing it.
And caused me to have an epiphany of sorts...
Or am i missing a god here. Last time I checked, my copy of the King
James Version has the Olt Testament in there.
The Christian god (the Big Fella) is the same as the Jew god, but the
christians actually mellowed him out a bit. So mellow, in fact, that
he was sufficiently concerned about our welfare to, as you say, send
his whelp down here to save our sorry undeserving hides.
Not so the Jew god though. Mean, authoritarian, nasty like you
wouldn't believe. No redeeming qualities whatsoever. And the Jews
model themselves on that older, nastier version of god(tm)
And THAT, in a nutshell, is why Jews are, despite their smaller
numbers, just as dangerous as christians (IMHO, FAR more dangerous
than Xtians, but YMMV).
Thanks for giving me the nudge in the right direction there. Wow.
Is there in this world a less suitable and more dangerous bunch of
people to run a world-wide theocratic dictatorship than the jew$?
Well, me. You wouldn;t like me.
Ahhh, c'mon, you're just a big ole teddy bear.
But in Israel today, everyone is free to worship as they please. I've
been there bunky. I know.
You mean you have actually been to the country that has just now been
voted most likely to ***** up the whole planet and turn it into a
glowing pile of radioactive ash?
Well, lucky you, I'm sure.
Try praying toawrds mecca in St. Peter's
Square sometime.
I have no intention of doing any such thing.
Douglas, I like it when we are having a discussion, rather than just
insulting each other.
Let's do it again soon.
As you wish.
M'kay.
T.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism |
31 Oct 2003 06:57:16 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 21:10:14 +0000, Douglas Berry wrote:
Lo, many moons past, on 31 Oct 2003 12:01:54 -0800, a stranger called
by some (Thurston Phoremost) came
forth and told this tale in alt.atheism
FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism
- #1 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
Nonsense. Name one time a Jew has come in here and called us name,
demand that we convert, and generally acted like an *****.
Doesn't matter. Phoremost won't be happy until we all hate the Jews, trash
the Jews in every post, and praise Christianity for being benign and
peaceful...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
"The computer revolution is over. We lost."
.
|
|
|
| User: "E. L." |
|
| Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 good words of alt.jewishdom |
01 Nov 2003 03:14:28 PM |
|
|
Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism
Group: alt.atheism
Date: Fri, Oct 31, 2003, 6:57pm (EST-1) From:
(Mark=A0K.=A0Bilbo)
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 21:10:14 +0000, Douglas Berry wrote:
Lo, many moons past, on 31 Oct 2003 12:01:54 -0800, a stranger called by
some (Thurston Phoremost) came forth and
told this tale in alt.atheism
FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism
- #1 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
-----
Nonsense. Name one time a Jew has come in here and called us name,
demand that we convert, and generally acted like an *****.
------
Doesn't matter. Phoremost won't be happy until we all hate the Jews,
trash the Jews in every post, and praise Christianity for being benign
and peaceful...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
"The computer revolution is over. We lost."
el: "Mark, I hope you don't mind my using your reply as a platform to
take off with my POV. Not necessarily in favor of jews, 'cause after
all it is a religion and I could never say anything good about
religions. However, my wife is a non-practicing jew who is
almost-but-not-quite an atheist, leaning more towards agnostism while
also hating all religions. She just believes in a "power." So, to stay
with the program, I can say the following good things about SOME jews,
and I know quite a few, mostly in my 60+ apartment coop. They
definitely do not push their religion, even the "orthodox" ones. If you
engage them about it they will talk about its 'superiority.' But not in
a converting way. Whenever you visit a jewish home, the first words out
of their mouths are "Did you eat?" When they have their rituals, they
are usually centered around eating with some singing thrown in and
reading some short questions about the jews' history. There's a temple
up the street and every Saturday when they leave the services they are
all well-dressed and seem happy. They're not like the Pentecostals
around the corner who in a small "temple" (a former storefront) not only
sing their stupid songs but they have a hell of a PA system which they
employ to its maximum, leaving the door to the sidewalk open so that
they can be heard across town! Because of the myth of jewish
controlling all of the money in the world, my wife has seen to it that
we are well off by investing extremely intelligently and insuring us and
our belongings to maximum protection. Most of the people who find
themselves in bad situations don't have this protective mentality and
find themselves suffering whenever disaster strikes. If I had to choose
just one religion to live with on planet earth, I would definitely go
with the jewish religion, 'cause they would also leave me alone."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Erica" |
|
| Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism |
31 Oct 2003 07:14:32 PM |
|
|
In article <pan.2003.11.01.00.57.16.397980@eac.org>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 21:10:14 +0000, Douglas Berry wrote:
Lo, many moons past, on 31 Oct 2003 12:01:54 -0800, a stranger called
by some (Thurston Phoremost) came
forth and told this tale in alt.atheism
FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism
- #1 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
Nonsense. Name one time a Jew has come in here and called us name,
demand that we convert, and generally acted like an *****.
Doesn't matter. Phoremost won't be happy until we all hate the Jews, trash
the Jews in every post, and praise Christianity for being benign and
peaceful...
I dunno. Looking at his posting history, unless I'm missing something,
he doesn't have much love for the Christians either. He just has alot of
hate for Jews. Lots and lots.
The shmuck.
Erica
--
My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Thurston Phoremost" |
|
| Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism |
01 Nov 2003 03:30:07 PM |
|
|
Erica <scribe53151NOSPAM@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<scribe53151NOSPAM-E52D1D.19143231102003@newshost1.news.tds.net>...
In article <pan.2003.11.01.00.57.16.397980@eac.org>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 21:10:14 +0000, Douglas Berry wrote:
Lo, many moons past, on 31 Oct 2003 12:01:54 -0800, a stranger called
by some (Thurston Phoremost) came
forth and told this tale in alt.atheism
FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism
- #1 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
Nonsense. Name one time a Jew has come in here and called us name,
demand that we convert, and generally acted like an *****.
Doesn't matter. Phoremost won't be happy until we all hate the Jews, trash
the Jews in every post, and praise Christianity for being benign and
peaceful...
I dunno. Looking at his posting history, unless I'm missing something,
he doesn't have much love for the Christians either. He just has alot of
hate for Jews. Lots and lots.
It's true that I don't have a very high regard for jew$. They weren't
always bad, though. Once upon a time, they did good works in the
world. For example, they nailed that jesus fuckhead to a couple of
bits of wood. Made him carry the wood for fucking miles, they did,
before they nailed him to it. Hey, you jews have got some fucking
STYLE, you know? Or at least, you did.
Since then, though, it's all been downhill. Now, all we have is these
heebie "neocons" who send young men off to kill and die in Iraq for no
purpose whatsoever and who rob the American taxpayer of 30 billion
dollars a year and send it to Yidsrael.
And George Wubbleya is too stupid to see how the heebies are using
him. Sad, eh?
They used Clintoon too, Clintoon knew they were using him though, but
he just didn't give a rat's. He was too busy having the Presidential
Penis attended to by Monica Jewinski.
The shmuck.
Yep. I agree. But what can you do?
T.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism |
01 Nov 2003 08:44:07 PM |
|
|
Lo, many moons past, on 1 Nov 2003 13:30:07 -0800, a stranger called
by some (Thurston Phoremost) came
forth and told this tale in alt.atheism
It's true that I don't have a very high regard for jew$. They weren't
always bad, though. Once upon a time, they did good works in the
world. For example, they nailed that jesus fuckhead to a couple of
bits of wood. Made him carry the wood for fucking miles, they did,
before they nailed him to it. Hey, you jews have got some fucking
STYLE, you know? Or at least, you did.
Actually, that was the Romans. I'm an atheist and even I know that.
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Thurston Phoremost" |
|
| Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism |
02 Nov 2003 07:11:18 AM |
|
|
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message news:<2rr8qvsnb16arpv7dsk2ch2t9b866bob78@4ax.com>...
Lo, many moons past, on 1 Nov 2003 13:30:07 -0800, a stranger called
by some (Thurston Phoremost) came
forth and told this tale in alt.atheism
It's true that I don't have a very high regard for jew$. They weren't
always bad, though. Once upon a time, they did good works in the
world. For example, they nailed that jesus fuckhead to a couple of
bits of wood. Made him carry the wood for fucking miles, they did,
before they nailed him to it. Hey, you jews have got some fucking
STYLE, you know? Or at least, you did.
Actually, that was the Romans.
Actually, there never was a jesus, really. But if there had been, the
jews would have most probably got the romans to kill him.
I'm an atheist and even I know that.
You didn't even know that there's no such thing as a jeebus.
T.
--
Jesus had himself killed because he needed the publicity.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism |
01 Nov 2003 10:22:53 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 02:44:07 +0000, Douglas Berry wrote:
Lo, many moons past, on 1 Nov 2003 13:30:07 -0800, a stranger called
by some (Thurston Phoremost) came
forth and told this tale in alt.atheism
It's true that I don't have a very high regard for jew$. They weren't
always bad, though. Once upon a time, they did good works in the
world. For example, they nailed that jesus fuckhead to a couple of
bits of wood. Made him carry the wood for fucking miles, they did,
before they nailed him to it. Hey, you jews have got some fucking
STYLE, you know? Or at least, you did.
Actually, that was the Romans. I'm an atheist and even I know that.
Actually, it wasn't anybody since nobody can show this "Jesus" existed...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
"The computer revolution is over. We lost."
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny Bravo" |
|
| Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism |
02 Nov 2003 12:15:13 PM |
|
|
On 1 Nov 2003 13:30:07 -0800, (Thurston
Phoremost) wrote:
It's true that I don't have a very high regard for jew$. They weren't
always bad, though. Once upon a time, they did good works in the
world. For example, they nailed that jesus fuckhead to a couple of
bits of wood.
Jews, Romans; it's all the same to someone of your inability to
grasp reality.
--
"The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability
of the human mind to correlate all its contents." - H.P. Lovecraft
.
|
|
|
| User: "Thurston Phoremost" |
|
| Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism |
03 Nov 2003 02:38:15 PM |
|
|
Johnny Bravo <nospam@no.com> wrote in message news:<dtbaqvsulk52261tun565cf5e2bluqakro@4ax.com>...
On 1 Nov 2003 13:30:07 -0800, (Thurston
Phoremost) wrote:
It's true that I don't have a very high regard for jew$. They weren't
always bad, though. Once upon a time, they did good works in the
world. For example, they nailed that jesus fuckhead to a couple of
bits of wood.
Jews, Romans; it's all the same to someone of your inability to
grasp reality.
Johnny, it's you who have trouble with grasping reality.
There is no jesus, nor was there ever a jesus. The jew$ have killed
plenty of people, but jesus is not, and cannot, be one of them.
Jesus is as false and mythological as that evil jewish god that you
believe in.
HTH.
T.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny Bravo" |
|
| Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism |
03 Nov 2003 05:53:59 PM |
|
|
On 3 Nov 2003 12:38:15 -0800, (Thurston
Phoremost) wrote:
Johnny Bravo <nospam@no.com> wrote in message news:<dtbaqvsulk52261tun565cf5e2bluqakro@4ax.com>...
On 1 Nov 2003 13:30:07 -0800, (Thurston
Phoremost) wrote:
It's true that I don't have a very high regard for jew$. They weren't
always bad, though. Once upon a time, they did good works in the
world. For example, they nailed that jesus fuckhead to a couple of
bits of wood.
Jews, Romans; it's all the same to someone of your inability to
grasp reality.
Johnny, it's you who have trouble with grasping reality.
There is no jesus, nor was there ever a jesus. The jew$ have killed
plenty of people, but jesus is not, and cannot, be one of them.
Jesus is as false and mythological as that evil jewish god that you
believe in.
It's really hard to carry on a conversation with someone so mentally
deficient they can't even remember thier own posts.
"For example, they [jews] nailed that jesus fuckhead to a couple of
bits of wood. " - Thurston Phoremost
"The jew$ have killed plenty of people, but jesus is not, and cannot,
be one of them." - Thurston Phoremost
Get back to us when you can remember your posts from one day to the
next.
--
"The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability
of the human mind to correlate all its contents." - H.P. Lovecraft
.
|
|
|
| User: "Thurston Phoremost" |
|
| Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism |
04 Nov 2003 07:44:11 AM |
|
|
Johnny Bravo <nospam@no.com> wrote in message news:<keqdqvonearjta7eajneb5u7k7hqvlc728@4ax.com>...
On 3 Nov 2003 12:38:15 -0800, (Thurston
Phoremost) wrote:
Johnny Bravo <nospam@no.com> wrote in message news:<dtbaqvsulk52261tun565cf5e2bluqakro@4ax.com>...
On 1 Nov 2003 13:30:07 -0800, (Thurston
Phoremost) wrote:
It's true that I don't have a very high regard for jew$. They weren't
always bad, though. Once upon a time, they did good works in the
world. For example, they nailed that jesus fuckhead to a couple of
bits of wood.
Jews, Romans; it's all the same to someone of your inability to
grasp reality.
Johnny, it's you who have trouble with grasping reality.
There is no jesus, nor was there ever a jesus. The jew$ have killed
plenty of people, but jesus is not, and cannot, be one of them.
Jesus is as false and mythological as that evil jewish god that you
believe in.
It's really hard to carry on a conversation with someone so mentally
deficient they can't even remember thier own posts.
"For example, they [jews] nailed that jesus fuckhead to a couple of
bits of wood. " - Thurston Phoremost
"The jew$ have killed plenty of people, but jesus is not, and cannot,
be one of them." - Thurston Phoremost
Get back to us when you can remember your posts from one day to the
next.
Ooo ouch, you got me.
There, feel any better now?
Tsk tsk. You are a sad, bitter, twisted old hobgoblin, eh Mr Bravo?
But I know what you need.
You need love. You need reassurance. You need validation.
But most of all ...
You need a great big old hug :)
Come here, you big old shaggy teddy bear you.
Naah, on second thoughts, why don't you just go ***** and die in a ditch.
T.
--
Jesus had himself killed because he needed the publicity.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism |
31 Oct 2003 08:36:46 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 19:14:32 -0600, Erica wrote:
In article <pan.2003.11.01.00.57.16.397980@eac.org>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 21:10:14 +0000, Douglas Berry wrote:
Lo, many moons past, on 31 Oct 2003 12:01:54 -0800, a stranger called
by some (Thurston Phoremost) came
forth and told this tale in alt.atheism
FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism
- #1 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
Nonsense. Name one time a Jew has come in here and called us name,
demand that we convert, and generally acted like an *****.
Doesn't matter. Phoremost won't be happy until we all hate the Jews, trash
the Jews in every post, and praise Christianity for being benign and
peaceful...
I dunno. Looking at his posting history, unless I'm missing something,
he doesn't have much love for the Christians either. He just has alot of
hate for Jews. Lots and lots.
Well, maybe he was just doing that to bait me. Funny, didn't work.
The shmuck.
Ayup.
I think he's been here before. Same cant. Just as boring.
--
Mark K. Bilbo
"The computer revolution is over. We lost."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism |
01 Nov 2003 12:32:50 AM |
|
|
On 31 Oct 2003 12:01:54 -0800,
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:
FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism
- #1 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #2 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #3 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #4 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #5 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #6 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #7 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #8 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #9 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #10 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
Gotta be Brandon Orr. He never was very subtle.
darkstar@shell1.iglou.com (Keenan Clay Wilkie) wrote in message news:<3fa20ef1_1@news.iglou.com>...
Barry OGrady <god_freee_jones@hotmail.com> writes:
On 28 Oct 2003 02:35:39 -0800, (Thurston Phoremost) wrote:
I've noticed a double double standard standard here in alt.atheism.
It seems you can say anything you like about christians here. You can
abuse, ridicule, cuss - in fact, even the most vile bigoted
invective-laden stereotype , if aimed by atheists at christians, is
perfectly acceptable.
But as soon as you mention that Jew$ are often thought of as being a
bit greedy, well, suddenly you are persona non grata, and are plonked
by every hypocrite wanker in the newsgroup.
Can someone explain to me why it is OK to malign christians, but not
OK to say anything against Jew$?
Jews work very hard to suppress free speech about themselves so that they can
continue with their plans of world domination unhindered.
Anybody who supports the jews is putting themselves willingly into slavery.
Not content to bash Jews alone,
Would you prefer it if I only bashed xtians, just like you do?
Why? Is there a clause in the alt.atheism faq which forbids the
criticism of jew$?
Jew$ genuflect before the same idiotic butal god that the xtians do,
you know. Does this not mean that they are fair game too?
<idiotic accusations snipped>
.
|
|
|
| User: "William Klee" |
|
| Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism |
02 Nov 2003 09:58:03 PM |
|
|
In article <prk6qvs6vv3vrbiokp2ej0ir1qvojibo0q@4ax.com>, Michelle
Malkin <hypatiab7@earthlink.net> wrote:
On 31 Oct 2003 12:01:54 -0800,
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:
FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism
- #1 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #2 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #3 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #4 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #5 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #6 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #7 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #8 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #9 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #10 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
Gotta be Brandon Orr. He never was very subtle.
Haven't seen any Orr-sign yet: no mention of turd-munching or
gang-bangs.
darkstar@shell1.iglou.com (Keenan Clay Wilkie) wrote in message
news:<3fa20ef1_1@news.iglou.com>...
Barry OGrady <god_freee_jones@hotmail.com> writes:
On 28 Oct 2003 02:35:39 -0800, (Thurston
Phoremost) wrote:
I've noticed a double double standard standard here in alt.atheism.
It seems you can say anything you like about christians here. You can
abuse, ridicule, cuss - in fact, even the most vile bigoted
invective-laden stereotype , if aimed by atheists at christians, is
perfectly acceptable.
But as soon as you mention that Jew$ are often thought of as being a
bit greedy, well, suddenly you are persona non grata, and are plonked
by every hypocrite wanker in the newsgroup.
Can someone explain to me why it is OK to malign christians, but not
OK to say anything against Jew$?
Jews work very hard to suppress free speech about themselves so that they
can
continue with their plans of world domination unhindered.
Anybody who supports the jews is putting themselves willingly into
slavery.
Not content to bash Jews alone,
Would you prefer it if I only bashed xtians, just like you do?
Why? Is there a clause in the alt.atheism faq which forbids the
criticism of jew$?
Jew$ genuflect before the same idiotic butal god that the xtians do,
you know. Does this not mean that they are fair game too?
<idiotic accusations snipped>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Thurston Phoremost" |
|
| Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism |
03 Nov 2003 03:09:47 PM |
|
|
William Klee <fnord2k@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<021120032158037691%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...
In article <prk6qvs6vv3vrbiokp2ej0ir1qvojibo0q@4ax.com>, Michelle
Malkin <hypatiab7@earthlink.net> wrote:
On 31 Oct 2003 12:01:54 -0800,
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:
FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism
- #1 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #2 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #3 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #4 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #5 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #6 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #7 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #8 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #9 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #10 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
Gotta be Brandon Orr. He never was very subtle.
Haven't seen any Orr-sign yet: no mention of turd-munching or
gang-bangs.
That jewish god you worship is the same as evil god that the xtians
worship, and if you weren't a turd-munching gang-banger, you'd realize
that.
For your penance, I order you to study the Seventh Commandment of
alt.atheism.
When you have done that, I want you to write at least 5,000 words
discussing the crucial role that the Seventh Commandment of
alt.atheism performs in maintaing the high standard of hypocrisy in
alt.atheism.
You may also want to include a discussion of the hypocrisy in
alt.atheism, explaining why alt.atheism hypocrisy is good, whereas all
other hypocrisy is bad.
Your essay has to be on my desk on or before this Friday afternoon.
Should you not be on time, you will then have to study the Fifth
Commandment, and write 10,000 words about that one.
Better get scribbling, eh?
T.
.
|
|
|
| User: "William Klee" |
|
| Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism |
04 Nov 2003 01:57:20 PM |
|
|
In article <acb7fa96.0311031309.48f5497b@posting.google.com>, Thurston
Phoremost <> wrote:
William Klee <fnord2k@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<021120032158037691%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...
In article <prk6qvs6vv3vrbiokp2ej0ir1qvojibo0q@4ax.com>, Michelle
Malkin <hypatiab7@earthlink.net> wrote:
On 31 Oct 2003 12:01:54 -0800,
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:
FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism
- #1 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #2 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #3 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #4 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #5 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #6 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #7 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #8 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #9 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #10 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
Gotta be Brandon Orr. He never was very subtle.
Haven't seen any Orr-sign yet: no mention of turd-munching or
gang-bangs.
That jewish god you worship is the same as evil god that the xtians
Spanky, I'm an atheist. I don't worship *any* god, jewish or otherwise.
And since you started off with idiocy, I see no reason to look at the
rest of your screed.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Thurston Phoremost" |
|
| Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism |
04 Nov 2003 08:53:21 PM |
|
|
William Klee <fnord2k@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<041120031357209648%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...
In article <acb7fa96.0311031309.48f5497b@posting.google.com>, Thurston
Phoremost < > wrote:
William Klee <fnord2k@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<021120032158037691%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...
In article <prk6qvs6vv3vrbiokp2ej0ir1qvojibo0q@4ax.com>, Michelle
Malkin <hypatiab7@earthlink.net> wrote:
On 31 Oct 2003 12:01:54 -0800,
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:
FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism
- #1 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #2 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #3 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #4 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #5 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #6 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #7 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #8 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #9 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #10 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
Gotta be Brandon Orr. He never was very subtle.
Haven't seen any Orr-sign yet: no mention of turd-munching or
gang-bangs.
That jewish god you worship is the same as evil god that the xtians
Spanky, I'm an atheist. I don't worship *any* god, jewish or otherwise.
*****.
And since you started off with idiocy, I see no reason to look at the
rest of your screed.
Perhaps you've mistaken me for someone who cares about that, Willie?
T.
--
"I grew up in a very god fearing household... thats because every
Sunday god used to come round and beat us all up!" -Alexei Sayle
.
|
|
|
| User: "William Klee" |
|
| Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism |
05 Nov 2003 11:14:33 AM |
|
|
In article <acb7fa96.0311041853.aa8cefa@posting.google.com>, Thurston
Phoremost <> wrote:
William Klee <fnord2k@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<041120031357209648%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...
In article <acb7fa96.0311031309.48f5497b@posting.google.com>, Thurston
Phoremost < > wrote:
William Klee <fnord2k@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<021120032158037691%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...
In article <prk6qvs6vv3vrbiokp2ej0ir1qvojibo0q@4ax.com>, Michelle
Malkin <hypatiab7@earthlink.net> wrote:
On 31 Oct 2003 12:01:54 -0800,
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:
FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism
- #1 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #2 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #3 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #4 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #5 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #6 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #7 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #8 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #9 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #10 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
Gotta be Brandon Orr. He never was very subtle.
Haven't seen any Orr-sign yet: no mention of turd-munching or
gang-bangs.
That jewish god you worship is the same as evil god that the xtians
Spanky, I'm an atheist. I don't worship *any* god, jewish or otherwise.
*****.
Yes, that *is* your major and only stock in trade.
And since you started off with idiocy, I see no reason to look at the
rest of your screed.
Perhaps you've mistaken me for someone who cares about that, Willie?
Yep, you care so little you respond like a good little puppet. Dance,
tool!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Thurston Phoremost" |
|
| Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism |
05 Nov 2003 05:10:43 PM |
|
|
William Klee <fnord2k@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<051120031114338314%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...
In article <acb7fa96.0311041853.aa8cefa@posting.google.com>, Thurston
Phoremost < > wrote:
William Klee <fnord2k@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<041120031357209648%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...
In article <acb7fa96.0311031309.48f5497b@posting.google.com>, Thurston
Phoremost < > wrote:
William Klee <fnord2k@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<021120032158037691%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...
In article <prk6qvs6vv3vrbiokp2ej0ir1qvojibo0q@4ax.com>, Michelle
Malkin <hypatiab7@earthlink.net> wrote:
On 31 Oct 2003 12:01:54 -0800,
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:
FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism
- #1 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #2 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #3 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #4 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #5 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #6 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #7 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #8 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #9 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #10 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
Gotta be Brandon Orr. He never was very subtle.
Haven't seen any Orr-sign yet: no mention of turd-munching or
gang-bangs.
That jewish god you worship is the same as evil god that the xtians
Spanky, I'm an atheist. I don't worship *any* god, jewish or otherwise.
*****.
Yes, that *is* your major and only stock in trade.
How witty. I thought you jews were supposed to be intelligent.
But you claim not to be a jew. Is your stupid behaviour part of your
effort to convince me that you're not a jew?
Well, it's not working. The only way you can convince me that you're
not a jew would be to successfully pretend not to be a lying
hypocrite. And I don't think you could pull it off.
And since you started off with idiocy, I see no reason to look at the
rest of your screed.
Perhaps you've mistaken me for someone who cares about that, Willie?
Yep, you care so little you respond like a good little puppet. Dance,
tool!
No, the only reason I respond to your content-less drivel is for the
purpose of seeing how angry you get because you can't have the last
word. :)
Well, I'll stop responding to your content-less drivel now, and I'll
let you have the last word.
Hey, I'll even supply that word for you. Here it is -
Goodbye.
T.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. Karl E. Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism |
01 Nov 2003 12:41:16 AM |
|
|
Michelle Malkin wrote:
On 31 Oct 2003 12:01:54 -0800,
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:
FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism
- #1 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #2 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #3 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #4 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #5 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #6 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #7 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #8 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #9 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #10 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
Gotta be Brandon Orr. He never was very subtle.
Ain't that the boy in a dress that likes to eat *****?
Or something like that?
I've been away for a while you know, and I'm still catching up on
trolls, kooks, net weenies, Ken Pangborn, and hit n spit theists.
--
There are none more ignorant and useless,
than they that seek answers on their knees,
with their eyes closed.
____________________________________________________________________
Rev. Karl E. Taylor
A.A #1143 ULC Minister
Home School Educator for Computer Science
Apostle of Dr. Lao EAC: Virgin Conversion Unit Director
____________________________________________________________________
.
|
|
|
| User: "Thurston Phoremost" |
|
| Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism |
01 Nov 2003 04:44:00 PM |
|
|
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote in message news:<3FA3558C.6060504@getnet.net>...
Michelle Malkin wrote:
On 31 Oct 2003 12:01:54 -0800,
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:
FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism
- #1 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #2 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #3 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #4 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #5 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #6 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #7 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #8 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #9 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #10 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
Gotta be Brandon Orr. He never was very subtle.
Ain't that the boy in a dress that likes to eat *****?
No, that's Fritz. Fritz is also the NAMBLA publicist and PR director
| | | |
