| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Thurston Phoremost" |
| Date: |
17 Oct 2003 03:01:10 AM |
| Object: |
Maybe these Xtians are useful after all? |
Department of Credit Where Credit Due Dept?
http://www.gospelcom.net/moh/WinkPrat/DTM/ContractOnChildrenPart2.htm
(...)
Yet a protected childhood is a relatively new thing, introduced by
Christian reformers. Only a century ago, children in England were made
to work in coal mines because they were considered the only ones with
bones flexible enough for the horrifying conditions. Imagine the
terror of their days in the mine shafts.
Human Flesh Was Cheaper
The simplest job was being a "trapper." A child was lowered 50 feet
down a shaft to squat in the mud in total darkness with trickling
water, beetles, and rats, waiting to open the trap door for other
children pulling coal cars. He would let the coal through and then
close the trap door again. That way, if there was a mine explosion, it
only killed the children between the doors. The trap doors cut off the
exploding gas from spreading further. Little children, seven or eight
years old, would sit in the dark every day, sometimes 18 to 20 hours,
listening for the coal cars. Some went insane. Yet in the mines, that
was the best job.
The children suffered terrible cruelty at the hands of adults, who
bargained for them, used them, and dismissed them as they pleased.
Many working underground were only eight or nine years old, girls as
well as boys. Some began toiling in the pits when they were only four
or five. They only saw the sun on Sundays. There were no hours of
relaxation, their meals were mostly eaten in the dark, and they lived
with parents who devoted them to this life.
Think about the actual pulling of the coal cars. Women or small
children had to crawl on their hands and knees dragging enormous
weights along narrow passageways that were only 18 to 24 inches in
height, and were as wet and slimy as common sewers. Women remained at
this work until the last hour of pregnancy. Boys and girls performed
the work by using a girdle and chain. A girdle was put around their
naked waist. A chain from the carriage was hooked to the girdle and
passed between their legs. Crawling on hands and knees they drew the
carriages after them.
"It is not necessary to describe," says Shaftesbury, the Christian
politician who fought against this horror for most of his life, "how
their sides were blistered, their ankles stained, their backs chafed
from rubbing against the roofs, or how they stumbled in the darkness
and choked in the stifling atmosphere. It is enough to say they were
obliged to do the work of horses or other beasts of the field, only
because human flesh and blood was cheaper in some cases and horse
labor was impossible in others."
(...)
.
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? |
03 Nov 2003 07:29:28 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 00:50:37 GMT, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:
Lo, many moons past, on 3 Nov 2003 13:51:49 -0800, a stranger called
by some (Thurston Phoremost) came
forth and told this tale in alt.atheism
raven1 <psychedelephant@flashmail.com> wrote in message news:<c039qvs3racp544nlrro2239u5fp72lf9l@4ax.com>...
On 1 Nov 2003 18:23:19 -0800, (Thurston
Phoremost) wrote:
At least I'm not a stodgy ol boring hypocrite jewboy bigot like you.
I am neither Jewish nor bigoted.
... but stodgy, boring, and a hypocrite are right on the money, eh? Oh
well, three outta five ain't bad.
You, OTOH...
Me? I just calls 'em as I sees 'em, Jewboy.
Why do you assume raven1 is Jewish?
What's particularly amusing is that I'm entirely of Irish Catholic
background, as I told the idiot more than once. Go figure.
(And even more amusing is that he's still responding after I've
killfiled him)...
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? |
01 Nov 2003 10:47:10 PM |
|
|
On 1 Nov 2003 18:23:19 -0800, (Thurston
Phoremost) wrote:
The only thing you could teach anyone would be how to be a nasty
poisonous fundamentalist jewboy.
That would be an interesting feat for an atheist of Irish Catholic
descent.
There aren't many Irish brights around. Not many bright Irish, either.
So you're an equal opportunity bigoted *****, I see.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? |
28 Oct 2003 04:52:21 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 14:21:32 -0800, Thurston Phoremost wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote in message news:<pan.2003.10.28.13.45.14.101088@eac.org>...
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 02:35:39 -0800, Thurston Phoremost wrote:
But as soon as you mention that Jew$ are often thought of as being a
bit greedy, well, suddenly you are persona non grata, and are plonked
by every hypocrite wanker in the newsgroup.
That's because it's stereotypical crap from bigots.
And your unrelenting and nasty christian-bashing isn't? You are a
hypocrite.
Ah, you are a troll then.
"Jew" isn't a religion.
Neither is "christian" a religion, nevertheless you hypocrites roast
them with "gay" abandon (and I shall have more to say later about all
the NAMBLA queers infesting this newsgroup) right along with their
belief system.
Troll, definitely.
Judaism is. Someone of Jewish descent can be
secular, atheist, agnostic, humanist, or otherwise non-theist. Someone of
non-Jewish descent can join Judaism. It isn't being a "hypocrite" to
notice the difference.
Jews are far more dangerous, at this present moment in history, than
Christians are. Christians are not piloting helicopter gunships over
heavily populated cities and blasting civilians indiscriminately with
machine gun and rocket attacks, and carrying out a policy of
"collective punishment".
It is Jew$ that are committing these atrocities, yet you hypocrites
would rather ***** and moan about the Inquisition than address the
brutalities that are happening now, today, in the name of that
self-same fictitious god.
No, *****, that's Israel. Which isn't "a Jew" it's a *country. Obviously
you don't have a fucking clue about this place since you don't seem to see
the *frequent criticism of the actions of Israel.
Radical, fundamentalist Judaism isn't any more well regarded here
than radical, fundamentalist Christianity or Islam. Or any other religion.
We just get more fundie christbots than anything else.
"fundie christbots"? Is this another example of you attacking
christianity, and not attacking christians?
You are not only a hypocrite, you are stupid along with it.
Sure troll boy.
I mean, DUH, which religion is in the majority in the English speaking
world in which most of us here reside?
You should concern yourself instead by considering which religion is
the most dangerous and destructive religion, in not only the english
speaking world, but in the whole world. And that religion is judaism.
In your bigoted troll world maybe. Judaism is a tiny minority religion on
the planet and the radicals they have are a fraction of that fraction.
You want to talk Israel, there's a country that's got some *serious
problems and some very nasty policies. But, then, we--the United
States--helped create them and prop them up.
Which is a policy fundamentalist christians are one of the most vocal
groups of SUPPORT for.
You're just trying to rationalize bigotry.
No, in fact, I'm just trying to point out hypocrisy, political
correctness, and dishonesty of the type that you have displayed here.
Yawn.
But you're comparing apples and
oranges...
No, I'm comparing a relatively benign, harmless religion
(christianity) with a different religion (Judai$m) which today, right
now, is using murder and *terrorism* to advance its agenda of greed
and hatred.
Benign, harmless religion?
Tell that to the Indians.
I mean, if you can find any that survived the arrival of the "begin,
harmless religion."
--
Mark K. Bilbo
"The computer revolution is over. We lost."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Thurston Phoremost" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? |
30 Oct 2003 03:25:03 AM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote in message news:<pan.2003.10.28.22.52.19.189200@eac.org>...
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 14:21:32 -0800, Thurston Phoremost wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote in message news:<pan.2003.10.28.13.45.14.101088@eac.org>...
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 02:35:39 -0800, Thurston Phoremost wrote:
But as soon as you mention that Jew$ are often thought of as being a
bit greedy, well, suddenly you are persona non grata, and are plonked
by every hypocrite wanker in the newsgroup.
That's because it's stereotypical crap from bigots.
And your unrelenting and nasty christian-bashing isn't? You are a
hypocrite.
Ah, you are a troll then.
You are a hypocrite who trashes Christians whilst defending Jew$.
"Jew" isn't a religion.
Neither is "christian" a religion, nevertheless you hypocrites roast
them with "gay" abandon (and I shall have more to say later about all
the NAMBLA queers infesting this newsgroup) right along with their
belief system.
Troll, definitely.
No, just exposing you as a nasty, poisonous little Kike who trashes
christians while defending Jew$
Judaism is. Someone of Jewish descent can be
secular, atheist, agnostic, humanist, or otherwise non-theist. Someone of
non-Jewish descent can join Judaism. It isn't being a "hypocrite" to
notice the difference.
Jews are far more dangerous, at this present moment in history, than
Christians are. Christians are not piloting helicopter gunships over
heavily populated cities and blasting civilians indiscriminately with
machine gun and rocket attacks, and carrying out a policy of
"collective punishment".
It is Jew$ that are committing these atrocities, yet you hypocrites
would rather ***** and moan about the Inquisition than address the
brutalities that are happening now, today, in the name of that
self-same fictitious god.
No, *****, that's Israel. Which isn't "a Jew" it's a *country.
Yes, a country full of nasty viscious Jew$ who support the ongoing
genocide against the people they have displaced.
Obviously
you don't have a fucking clue about this place since you don't seem to see
the *frequent criticism of the actions of Israel.
Lying *****, show me where you have posted a criticism of the murderous
actions of Israel.
Radical, fundamentalist Judaism isn't any more well regarded here
than radical, fundamentalist Christianity or Islam. Or any other religion.
It's just that you flame anyone who criticizes Jew$, and applaud
anyone who criticizes Xtians. It's called Hypocrisy and Double
Standards.
We just get more fundie christbots than anything else.
"fundie christbots"? Is this another example of you attacking
christianity, and not attacking christians?
You are not only a hypocrite, you are stupid along with it.
Sure troll boy.
You deny it, but the evidence is right there.
I mean, DUH, which religion is in the majority in the English speaking
world in which most of us here reside?
You should concern yourself instead by considering which religion is
the most dangerous and destructive religion, in not only the english
speaking world, but in the whole world. And that religion is judaism.
In your bigoted troll world maybe. Judaism is a tiny minority religion on
the planet and the radicals they have are a fraction of that fraction.
*****. Jews all believe themselves to be a Chosen Master Race,
better than non-Jew$, because "god says so, so there".
You want to talk Israel, there's a country that's got some *serious
problems and some very nasty policies. But, then, we--the United
States--helped create them and prop them up.
Correction - the Jew$ that control the United States have ordered the
United States to help create israel and continue to prop them up with
massive injections of cash and weapons of mass destruction.
Which is a policy fundamentalist christians are one of the most vocal
groups of SUPPORT for.
See above, American Jew$ are pulling the strings.
You're just trying to rationalize bigotry.
No, in fact, I'm just trying to point out hypocrisy, political
correctness, and dishonesty of the type that you have displayed here.
Yawn.
But you're comparing apples and
oranges...
No, I'm comparing a relatively benign, harmless religion
(christianity) with a different religion (Judai$m) which today, right
now, is using murder and *terrorism* to advance its agenda of greed
and hatred.
Benign, harmless religion?
At the present time, yes.
Tell that to the Indians.
Indians? How are Indians relevant to this discussion?
The Indians have far more to fear from bathing in and drinking water
from the filthy Ganges River, and far more to fear from radical Hindus
and radical Moslems, than they do from Christians. In fact, quite a
few million Indians ARE christians.
If by "Indians" you mean Native Americans, well, they are doing quite
nicely thank you from the foolish Christians who go to the casinos and
roll the dice. And anyway, some Native Americans are in fact
Christians.
If by saying "tell that to the Indians" you are attempting to say that
Christians are murdering "Indians" today, well, it's simply not true.
The USA, a predominantly Christian nation, does quite a lot to protect
the "Indians".
Unlike the treatment that Jew$ in Palestine are today inflicting on
the people they disposessed. And the Jew$ in the USA are working to
maintain the killing and torture of the Palestinians by pressuring the
US Govt to keep sending billions of dollars to Israel.
And Jewpigs like you flame anyone who criticizes this abomination.
I mean, if you can find any that survived the arrival of the "begin,
harmless religion."
There are still plenty of "Indians" around the place, and the
Christians treat them better than Jewpigs like you treat the
Palestinians.
T.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny Bravo" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? |
30 Oct 2003 05:03:16 AM |
|
|
On 30 Oct 2003 01:25:03 -0800,
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:
If by "Indians" you mean Native Americans, well, they are doing quite
nicely thank you from the foolish Christians who go to the casinos and
roll the dice. And anyway, some Native Americans are in fact
Christians.
If by saying "tell that to the Indians" you are attempting to say that
Christians are murdering "Indians" today, well, it's simply not true.
The USA, a predominantly Christian nation, does quite a lot to protect
the "Indians".
Tell that to the estimated 14.2% of American Indian households who
don't even have electricity compared to the 1.3% of the rest of the
country. 41.7% of all Native American land is in Alaska, not exactly
a winter vacation destination.
Unlike the treatment that Jew$ in Palestine are today inflicting on
the people they disposessed. And the Jew$ in the USA are working to
maintain the killing and torture of the Palestinians by pressuring the
US Govt to keep sending billions of dollars to Israel.
Here you go with the double standards again.
It's ok for American Christians to kill a large percentage of the
people living in a country because they want the land, forcing the
rest to relocate to less than desirable land to live in abject poverty
as long as they get a few casinos a hundred years later. But it's not
ok for Israeli Jews to kill a small percentage of the people living in
a country because they want the land, forcing the rest to relocate to
less than desireable land to live in poverty. Don't they get a
hundred years to give the Palestinians a few casinos before you judge
them?
--
"The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability
of the human mind to correlate all its contents." - H.P. Lovecraft
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny Bravo" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? |
30 Oct 2003 04:44:32 AM |
|
|
On 30 Oct 2003 01:25:03 -0800,
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:
No, *****, that's Israel. Which isn't "a Jew" it's a *country.
Yes, a country full of nasty viscious Jew$ who support the ongoing
genocide against the people they have displaced.
The world is full of countries that once supported an ongoing
genocide against the people they displaced; countries like America,
England, France, Germany, Japan, Russia, China, Italy, Turkey, Greece,
ect.. So what. If you are really that offended, get on a plane, fly
to the Middle East, pick up a rifle and do someting more than post off
topic messages in a Usenet group.
--
"The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability
of the human mind to correlate all its contents." - H.P. Lovecraft
.
|
|
|
| User: "Thurston Phoremost" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? |
30 Oct 2003 02:50:53 PM |
|
|
Johnny Bravo <nospam@no.com> wrote in message news:<1hq1qvo608d7mkqkjbi8djoo7pfptmoo81@4ax.com>...
On 30 Oct 2003 01:25:03 -0800,
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:
No, *****, that's Israel. Which isn't "a Jew" it's a *country.
Yes, a country full of nasty viscious Jew$ who support the ongoing
genocide against the people they have displaced.
The world is full of countries that once supported an ongoing
genocide against the people they displaced; countries like America,
England, France, Germany, Japan, Russia, China, Italy, Turkey, Greece,
ect..
That's true.
So what.
The "so what" of it is that we are free to condemn the past genocidal
behaviour of any and all of the countries above, who no longer
practice genocide, but as soon as we point out the genocide and
atrocity that the Jew$ are committing RIGHT NOW, then we are accused
of bigotry or racism or whatever.
"So what", you say? Well, you tell me.
If you are really that offended, get on a plane, fly
to the Middle East, pick up a rifle and do someting more than post off
topic messages in a Usenet group.
I assert that Jew$ commit violence in the name of their "god". I
further assert that we'd be better off without religious nut-jobs who
use some imaginary god to justify mayhem and murder.
In what way are these assertions "off topic" in an atheism discussion
group?
T.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny Bravo" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? |
30 Oct 2003 05:19:33 PM |
|
|
On 30 Oct 2003 12:50:53 -0800,
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:
"So what", you say? Well, you tell me.
I see that your 's' key isn't broken, perhaps when you graduate to
correctly spelling four letter words we'll pick up this discussion.
--
"The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability
of the human mind to correlate all its contents." - H.P. Lovecraft
.
|
|
|
| User: "Thurston Phoremost" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? |
31 Oct 2003 12:34:16 AM |
|
|
Johnny Bravo <nospam@no.com> wrote in message news:<u173qvsqjcp6gg1klfqmjue07lic84c9cb@4ax.com>...
On 30 Oct 2003 12:50:53 -0800,
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:
"So what", you say? Well, you tell me.
I see that your 's' key isn't broken, perhaps when you graduate to
correctly spelling four letter words we'll pick up this discussion.
What discussion? I say that if it's fair to trash Xtians, then it's
equally fair to trash jew$.
You disagree, you think it's fair to trash Xtians, but that jew$
should be above criticism.
There's nothing to discuss, or rather there's nothing that I'd want to
discuss with a closed-minded bigoted kike like you.
T.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? |
31 Oct 2003 01:13:25 AM |
|
|
"Thurston Phoremost" <> wrote in message
news:acb7fa96.0310302234.7856a1a8@posting.google.com...
Johnny Bravo <nospam@no.com> wrote in message
news:<u173qvsqjcp6gg1klfqmjue07lic84c9cb@4ax.com>...
On 30 Oct 2003 12:50:53 -0800,
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:
"So what", you say? Well, you tell me.
I see that your 's' key isn't broken, perhaps when you graduate to
correctly spelling four letter words we'll pick up this discussion.
What discussion? I say that if it's fair to trash Xtians, then it's
equally fair to trash jew$.
You disagree, you think it's fair to trash Xtians, but that jew$
should be above criticism.
There's nothing to discuss, or rather there's nothing that I'd want to
discuss with a closed-minded bigoted kike like you.
Goddammit!!! There goes another irony meter.
T.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "William Klee" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? |
31 Oct 2003 11:39:16 AM |
|
|
In article <acb7fa96.0310302234.7856a1a8@posting.google.com>, Thurston
Phoremost <> wrote:
Johnny Bravo <nospam@no.com> wrote in message
news:<u173qvsqjcp6gg1klfqmjue07lic84c9cb@4ax.com>...
On 30 Oct 2003 12:50:53 -0800,
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:
"So what", you say? Well, you tell me.
I see that your 's' key isn't broken, perhaps when you graduate to
correctly spelling four letter words we'll pick up this discussion.
What discussion? I say that if it's fair to trash Xtians, then it's
equally fair to trash jew$.
You disagree, you think it's fair to trash Xtians, but that jew$
should be above criticism.
There's nothing to discuss, or rather there's nothing that I'd want to
discuss with a closed-minded bigoted kike like you.
Jew $? Do jews use some other kind of money than other people in
whatever nation they're in? What do American jews use? Jewish dollars?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Thurston Phoremost" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? |
31 Oct 2003 04:35:14 PM |
|
|
William Klee <fnord2k@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<311020031139161750%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...
In article <acb7fa96.0310302234.7856a1a8@posting.google.com>, Thurston
Phoremost < > wrote:
Johnny Bravo <nospam@no.com> wrote in message
news:<u173qvsqjcp6gg1klfqmjue07lic84c9cb@4ax.com>...
On 30 Oct 2003 12:50:53 -0800,
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:
"So what", you say? Well, you tell me.
I see that your 's' key isn't broken, perhaps when you graduate to
correctly spelling four letter words we'll pick up this discussion.
What discussion? I say that if it's fair to trash Xtians, then it's
equally fair to trash jew$.
You disagree, you think it's fair to trash Xtians, but that jew$
should be above criticism.
There's nothing to discuss, or rather there's nothing that I'd want to
discuss with a closed-minded bigoted kike like you.
Jew $? Do jews use some other kind of money than other people in
whatever nation they're in?
Sometimes yes, sometimes no.
For example, in "Israel", the jew$$$ use American taxpayer $$$ to buy
the weapons to murder thousands of Palestinian men, women and
children. Something like 30 billion dollars of American taxpayer's
money per year, I believe.
If it was their OWN money they were spending, it'd be different. If it
was their own money they were spending, they'd be killing many more
civilians for much less money. Jews are very thrifty, you see.
What do American jews use? Jewish dollars?
No.
American jew$ use the same type of money as other Americans, the only
difference being that the jew$ don't actually produce anything of
value in order to earn that money.
My pleasure. Don't mention it. Oh, you're too kind, really.
T.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny Bravo" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? |
30 Oct 2003 04:47:45 AM |
|
|
On 30 Oct 2003 01:25:03 -0800,
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:
Radical, fundamentalist Judaism isn't any more well regarded here
than radical, fundamentalist Christianity or Islam. Or any other religion.
It's just that you flame anyone who criticizes Jew$, and applaud
anyone who criticizes Xtians. It's called Hypocrisy and Double
Standards.
Your friends in Palestine can teach you a thing or two about double
standards. In violation of the Geneva Conventions of War they
established a military command center in the middle of an urban area;
then when it was attacked they whined about Israel violating the
Geneva Conventions for attacking an urban area. You both seem to be
big on whining and little on much else.
--
"The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability
of the human mind to correlate all its contents." - H.P. Lovecraft
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? |
30 Oct 2003 09:44:01 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 01:25:03 -0800, Thurston Phoremost wrote:
If by "Indians" you mean Native Americans, well, they are doing quite
nicely thank you from the foolish Christians who go to the casinos and
roll the dice. And anyway, some Native Americans are in fact
Christians.
If by saying "tell that to the Indians" you are attempting to say that
Christians are murdering "Indians" today, well, it's simply not true.
The USA, a predominantly Christian nation, does quite a lot to protect
the "Indians".
Unlike the treatment that Jew$ in Palestine are today inflicting on
the people they disposessed. And the Jew$ in the USA are working to
maintain the killing and torture of the Palestinians by pressuring the
US Govt to keep sending billions of dollars to Israel.
And Jewpigs like you flame anyone who criticizes this abomination.
I mean, if you can find any that survived the arrival of the "begin,
harmless religion."
There are still plenty of "Indians" around the place, and the
Christians treat them better than Jewpigs like you treat the
Palestinians.
An apologist for christian genocide.
How unexpected.
NOT.
--
Mark K. Bilbo
"The computer revolution is over. We lost."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Thurston Phoremost" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? |
31 Oct 2003 02:44:38 PM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote in message news:<pan.2003.10.30.15.43.59.550237@eac.org>...
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 01:25:03 -0800, Thurston Phoremost wrote:
If by "Indians" you mean Native Americans, well, they are doing quite
nicely thank you from the foolish Christians who go to the casinos and
roll the dice. And anyway, some Native Americans are in fact
Christians.
If by saying "tell that to the Indians" you are attempting to say that
Christians are murdering "Indians" today, well, it's simply not true.
The USA, a predominantly Christian nation, does quite a lot to protect
the "Indians".
Unlike the treatment that Jew$ in Palestine are today inflicting on
the people they disposessed. And the Jew$ in the USA are working to
maintain the killing and torture of the Palestinians by pressuring the
US Govt to keep sending billions of dollars to Israel.
And Jewpigs like you flame anyone who criticizes this abomination.
I mean, if you can find any that survived the arrival of the "begin,
harmless religion."
There are still plenty of "Indians" around the place, and the
Christians treat them better than Jewpigs like you treat the
Palestinians.
An apologist for christian genocide.
Not at all. I'm just pointing out that there are still plenty of
"Indians" around the place, and the Christians treat them better than
Jewpigs like you treat the Palestinians.
But on the subject of Jewpigs and "indians" - Let's have a brief look
at how compassionate the Jewpigs, more specifiocally, the Hollywood
Jewpigs, are towards the Native Americans.
Think of all the John Wayne cowby type movies where the "Indians" are
depicted as cruel brutal subhuman savages who deserve to be
slaughtered for the heinous crime of opposing the intruders who want
to dispossess them of their land.
All those "Indians" being mowed down in a hail of bullets from the
guns of the jewpig-approved genocidal "settlers". And all served up to
us by the Compassionate Kike as "entertainment" - all in the interests
of making wealthy hollywood kikes even wealthier.
Wasn't it the Hollywood kikes who popularized the charming homily,
"The only good injun is a dead injun."? Today, they still say almost
the same, except, having killed off all the "injuns", they substitute
"palestinians".
Thus, Jewpig "art" imitates life, or rather, jewpig art imitates
death, the sort of deadly genocide that the "Israeli" Jewpigs , or
"compassionate kikes" if you prefer, hand out to the Palestinians on a
daily basis.
How unexpected.
You think so?
NOT.
You haven't yet explained to me just how you intend to carry out your
threat to "whip my *****".
T.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny Bravo" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? |
31 Oct 2003 03:52:49 PM |
|
|
On 31 Oct 2003 12:44:38 -0800,
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:
Not at all. I'm just pointing out that there are still plenty of
"Indians" around the place, and the Christians treat them better than
Jewpigs like you treat the Palestinians.
That's because Indians aren't strapping bombs to themselves and
blowing up Christians every other week. There is a lesson in that for
you and your Palestinian friends, if you can muster up your three
brain cells to find it.
--
"The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability
of the human mind to correlate all its contents." - H.P. Lovecraft
.
|
|
|
| User: "Thurston Phoremost" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? |
01 Nov 2003 06:37:45 AM |
|
|
Johnny Bravo <nospam@no.com> wrote in message news:<s0m5qvol0p1cfvss2deoogrh4dj0nv6sh0@4ax.com>...
On 31 Oct 2003 12:44:38 -0800,
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:
Not at all. I'm just pointing out that there are still plenty of
"Indians" around the place, and the Christians treat them better than
Jewpigs like you treat the Palestinians.
That's because Indians aren't strapping bombs to themselves and
blowing up Christians every other week. There is a lesson in that for
you and your Palestinian friends, if you can muster up your three
brain cells to find it.
So, the jew$ are quite justified in killing Palestinian civilians,
because Palestinian bombers kill jew civilians, right? Is this what
you're saying?
Well, for the moment, we'll temporarily pretend that what you're
saying is reasonable.
So OK, with that in mind, let's now take a trip back in history to a
time when white "settlers" were displacing and/or murdering "injuns".
Just how did these white "settlers" justify the massacres they brought
down on the "injuns"?
To the "injuns", these white "settlers" were the intruders stealing
their land and displacing the "injun" tribes, wiping out the animals
that the "injuns" hunted for food, burning their villiages, torturing
them, raping their women, etc, etc, etc you name it, every atrocity
you can think of.
So, when the "injuns" fought back in the only way they could, when
they attacked the wagon trains or some of the more remote
"settlements" etc, they often killed white civilians. Men, women and
children, deliberately or accidentally, they did it.
Or maybe they didn't, maybe that was just propaganda.
But anyway, before you know it, the "settlers" demand that the Army
goes in and metes out a little bit of "collective punishment". Being
much better armed and trained than most of the "injun" tribesmen, the
result is that the Army often massacres just about the whole tribe.
Thus the "injuns" are punished for killing one or two or maybe more
"settlers". The only good "injun", back then, was a dead "injun". And
there were plenty of "good injuns" left after the Army was finished.
Does any of this sound familiar to you? In a modern context, I mean?
Do you really believe that the only good Pallie is a dead Pallie? Can
you really justify murdering all those Palestinian civilians?
T.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny Bravo" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? |
01 Nov 2003 08:27:03 AM |
|
|
fOn 1 Nov 2003 04:37:45 -0800,
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:
Johnny Bravo <nospam@no.com> wrote in message news:<s0m5qvol0p1cfvss2deoogrh4dj0nv6sh0@4ax.com>...
On 31 Oct 2003 12:44:38 -0800,
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:
Not at all. I'm just pointing out that there are still plenty of
"Indians" around the place, and the Christians treat them better than
Jewpigs like you treat the Palestinians.
That's because Indians aren't strapping bombs to themselves and
blowing up Christians every other week. There is a lesson in that for
you and your Palestinian friends, if you can muster up your three
brain cells to find it.
So, the jew$ are quite justified in killing Palestinian civilians,
because Palestinian bombers kill jew civilians, right? Is this what
you're saying?
When you start a war you better be sure you can finish it, that's
what I'm saying.
Well, for the moment, we'll temporarily pretend that what you're
saying is reasonable.
So OK, with that in mind, let's now take a trip back in history to a
time when white "settlers" were displacing and/or murdering "injuns".
Just how did these white "settlers" justify the massacres they brought
down on the "injuns"?
They justified it by saying that the heathen savages weren't
Christian, so they felt no need for a reason other than "We want that
land, non-christian savages aren't even human so it is no crime to
kill them."
<snip unrelated drivel>
Does any of this sound familiar to you? In a modern context, I mean?
Not really. If Israel did to the Palestinians what the European
Settlers did to the Native Americans, there would be less than 70,000
Palestinians instead of the 2+ million that are alive today.
--
"The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability
of the human mind to correlate all its contents." - H.P. Lovecraft
.
|
|
|
| User: "Thurston Phoremost" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? |
01 Nov 2003 10:42:34 PM |
|
|
Johnny Bravo <nospam@no.com> wrote in message news:<1uf7qvgbicigm0debult0676oultfgs50p@4ax.com>...
fOn 1 Nov 2003 04:37:45 -0800,
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:
Johnny Bravo <nospam@no.com> wrote in message news:<s0m5qvol0p1cfvss2deoogrh4dj0nv6sh0@4ax.com>...
On 31 Oct 2003 12:44:38 -0800,
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:
Not at all. I'm just pointing out that there are still plenty of
"Indians" around the place, and the Christians treat them better than
Jewpigs like you treat the Palestinians.
That's because Indians aren't strapping bombs to themselves and
blowing up Christians every other week. There is a lesson in that for
you and your Palestinian friends, if you can muster up your three
brain cells to find it.
So, the jew$ are quite justified in killing Palestinian civilians,
because Palestinian bombers kill jew civilians, right? Is this what
you're saying?
When you start a war you better be sure you can finish it, that's
what I'm saying.
So how do the Yidsraelis intend to finish off the genocidal "war" that
they have declared against the Palestinians?
Well, for the moment, we'll temporarily pretend that what you're
saying is reasonable.
So OK, with that in mind, let's now take a trip back in history to a
time when white "settlers" were displacing and/or murdering "injuns".
Just how did these white "settlers" justify the massacres they brought
down on the "injuns"?
They justified it by saying that the heathen savages weren't
Christian, so they felt no need for a reason other than "We want that
land, non-christian savages aren't even human so it is no crime to
kill them."
Whoah!
A ghodalmighty flash and a BANG and a cloud of thick black smoke.
When the smoke finally clears, we see the charred remains of what once
was a perfectly good Unintentional Irony Meter. Nuttin' but landfill
now.
Sonofabitch.
You really do hate those Christians, don't you, jewpig?
<snip unrelated drivel>
That "unrelated drivel" was in fact a brief description of an
attempted genocide that would have been far deadlier and therefore far
more successful if the Jew$ had been doing it instead of the
Christaceans.
Does any of this sound familiar to you? In a modern context, I mean?
Not really. If Israel did to the Palestinians what the European
Settlers did to the Native Americans, there would be less than 70,000
Palestinians instead of the 2+ million that are alive today.
I bet it just eats away at you that there are still palestinians alive
today.
Maybe Sharon can get a few German engineers over to design some gas
chambers, would that bring a smile to your ugly jewish boat-race?
T.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Adam Marczyk" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? |
28 Oct 2003 01:09:41 PM |
|
|
Thurston Phoremost <thurston_phoremost@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:acb7fa96.0310280235.6ee40677@posting.google.com...
I've noticed a double double standard standard here in alt.atheism.
It seems you can say anything you like about christians here. You can
abuse, ridicule, cuss - in fact, even the most vile bigoted
invective-laden stereotype , if aimed by atheists at christians, is
perfectly acceptable.
But as soon as you mention that Jew$ are often thought of as being a
bit greedy, well, suddenly you are persona non grata, and are plonked
by every hypocrite wanker in the newsgroup.
In general, religious belief systems are actively disliked in alt.atheism
to the degree that their followers come to this newsgroup to harass us.
(That isn't to say I agree with such behavior, no matter the target - I
don't think it serves any purpose to insult any group. I am merely noting
that it happens.) Therefore evangelical Christians, who frequently come
here to preach and insult atheists, tend not to be warmly welcomed here;
whereas since Jews rarely if ever come here to proselytize, most atheists
are happy to leave well enough alone. Additionally, Judaism, unlike
Christianity, is an ethnicity at least as much as it is a religion, and
most atheists know the difference between disliking a belief system that a
person freely chooses to hold and disliking a fundamental aspect of a
person that they have no power to change. One of these is racism, which is
a false and evil belief; the other is not.
Oh, by the way...
*plonk*
--
"We have loved the stars too fondly | a.a. #2001
to be fearful of the night." | http://www.ebonmusings.org
--Tombstone epitaph of | e-mail: ebonmuse!hotmail.com
two amateur astronomers, | ICQ: 8777843
quoted in Carl Sagan's _Cosmos_ | PGP Key ID: 0x5C66F737
----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "stevieman" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? |
30 Oct 2003 01:18:26 AM |
|
|
In other words you don't want to hurt jews feelings because you're a
PC *****.
And they're an "ethnicity" so they have the right to have a religion
(and be parasites) but xtians don't. I got a pair of doc martens with
your name on them *****...
"Adam Marczyk" <ebonmuse@deletethis.hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<V9znb.6315$r87.3952@news02.roc.ny>...
Thurston Phoremost <thurston_phoremost@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:acb7fa96.0310280235.6ee40677@posting.google.com...
I've noticed a double double standard standard here in alt.atheism.
It seems you can say anything you like about christians here. You can
abuse, ridicule, cuss - in fact, even the most vile bigoted
invective-laden stereotype , if aimed by atheists at christians, is
perfectly acceptable.
But as soon as you mention that Jew$ are often thought of as being a
bit greedy, well, suddenly you are persona non grata, and are plonked
by every hypocrite wanker in the newsgroup.
In general, religious belief systems are actively disliked in alt.atheism
to the degree that their followers come to this newsgroup to harass us.
(That isn't to say I agree with such behavior, no matter the target - I
don't think it serves any purpose to insult any group. I am merely noting
that it happens.) Therefore evangelical Christians, who frequently come
here to preach and insult atheists, tend not to be warmly welcomed here;
whereas since Jews rarely if ever come here to proselytize, most atheists
are happy to leave well enough alone. Additionally, Judaism, unlike
Christianity, is an ethnicity at least as much as it is a religion, and
most atheists know the difference between disliking a belief system that a
person freely chooses to hold and disliking a fundamental aspect of a
person that they have no power to change. One of these is racism, which is
a false and evil belief; the other is not.
Oh, by the way...
*plonk*
.
|
|
|
| User: "Enkidu" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? |
30 Oct 2003 08:45:31 AM |
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
There seems to be a few sock puppets around here.
Enkidu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 6.5.8ckt http://www.ipgpp.com/
Comment: KeyID: 0x4F366721
iQA/AwUBP6EkCoTItnFPNmchEQLezACg2mp01GXhOvoPPNDAC3T5kSZBM00An1XL
7M4FxbfnmUIdWDbCMmYav+0+
=3kZM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Adam Marczyk" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? |
31 Oct 2003 06:33:08 PM |
|
|
stevieman <thestevieman@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:b098e932.0310292318.1f4feed9@posting.google.com...
In other words you don't want to hurt jews feelings because you're a
PC *****.
No. If you had mustered the comprehension to read my original post, you
would have understood my position, which is that I am content to leave the
Jews alone because they - like Hindus, like Buddhists, like Baha'is, like
Taoists, like Wiccans, like Rastafarians, but unlike evangelical
Christians - generally do not come to alt.atheism to harass and preach at
us. That does not mean I think their religion is any more valid; as an
atheist, I disbelieve in all gods and all religions equally. And I do not
withhold criticism of Judaism out of some misplaced notion of political
correctness; for example, I believe that the Hebrew Bible is a collection
of ancient mythology in which acts of genocide and other crimes against
humanity are justified by proclaiming them the will of God. However, I
reject idiotic racist stereotypes, and I do not judge people based on their
ethnicity.
And they're an "ethnicity" so they have the right to have a religion
(and be parasites) but xtians don't.
All people have the right to believe in any religion of their choosing, or
none at all. That is called freedom of thought. However, other people have
the right to disagree with them and point out fallacies and falsehoods in
their beliefs, for the same reason. I will ignore your paranoid ramblings
about "parasites".
I got a pair of doc martens with
your name on them *****...
I consider being insulted by ignorant racist scum such as yourself a badge
of honor. I do not advocate censoring anyone's free speech, no matter how
vile it is; nevertheless, I am glad that your kind is dying out. Does it
enrage you to hear that groups like the Southern Poverty Law Center
continue to successfully sue, and bankrupt, racist groups when they cross
the line into outright criminal behavior? Does it infuriate you to hear
that the college education of black children is being paid for by racists'
money? I don't know about you, but I just love poetic justice.
http://www.bupipedream.com/011106/news/n1.html
--
If you don't like a single thing that I'm saying | a.a. #2001
If you're offended when I demonstrate | ebonmuse!hotmail.com
Don't mean a damn to me and I shall continue | www.ebonmusings.org
Hope you won't mind if I control my fate | ICQ: 8777843
--Blues Traveler, "Freedom" | PGP Key ID: 0x5C66F737
----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "E. L." |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species...? |
01 Nov 2003 02:32:13 PM |
|
|
Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in
alt.atheism?
Group: alt.atheism
Date: Sat, Nov 1, 2003, 12:33am
(EST+5)
From:
ebonmuse@deletethis.hotmail.com
(Adam=A0Marczyk)
<snip>
All people have the right to believe in
any religion of their choosing, or none at
all. That is called freedom of thought.
el: "This is a misconception, people usually do not choose their
religion but is chosen for them (primarily by their parents) as they
grow up resulting from mental conditioning. So, they do not have
freedom of thought. Even when mature and it is pointed out to them that
their religion (insert any) is man-made they are so conditioned that it
is difficult to override their beliefs with logic and common sense and
written history."
However, other people have the right to disagree with them and point out
fallacies and falsehoods in their beliefs, <snip>
el: "It obviously doesn't do any good and you are just beating your head
against the wall. Mental conditioning is a powerful tool. Ask any
hypnotist, even amateurs."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Matthew" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species...? |
02 Nov 2003 03:16:03 AM |
|
|
"E. L." <nyceddie@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:6721-3FA4184D-248@storefull-2373.public.lawson.webtv.net...
Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in
alt.atheism?
Group: alt.atheism
Date: Sat, Nov 1, 2003, 12:33am
(EST+5)
From:
ebonmuse@deletethis.hotmail.com
(Adam Marczyk)
<snip>
All people have the right to believe in
any religion of their choosing, or none at
all. That is called freedom of thought.
el: "This is a misconception, people usually do not choose their
religion but is chosen for them (primarily by their parents) as they
grow up resulting from mental conditioning. So, they do not have
freedom of thought. Even when mature and it is pointed out to them that
their religion (insert any) is man-made they are so conditioned that it
is difficult to override their beliefs with logic and common sense and
written history."
However, other people have the right to disagree with them and point out
fallacies and falsehoods in their beliefs, <snip>
el: "It obviously doesn't do any good and you are just beating your head
against the wall. Mental conditioning is a powerful tool. Ask any
hypnotist, even amateurs."
That is jews are the least protected species. The are therefore one of the
most resiliant. Those that are most protected such as royalty are the least
resiliant.
Those who can do those who cant rule. It has always been the way to keep the
wealthy and powerful ignorant. Those that have power invariably find that. I
would like to see evidence of this sopossed hypnosis of which you speak.
Anyone with half a brain knows its just a parlour game. The people who
sopposedly practice this art have nothing look at the evidence. It is mostly
a state of self delusion. Most people laugh at hypnotists.
The reason most people adhere to a religion is that no man is an island,
remove the man from the belief system and the beliefs disappear.
You say are an athiest but i have yet to here of what your background is.
Which conditioning have you rejected.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mylon" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species...? |
02 Nov 2003 10:00:57 AM |
|
|
"Matthew" <mlonergan@netspace.net.au> wrote in message
news:bo2i1a$g21$1@otis.netspace.net.au...
You say are an athiest but i have yet to here of what your background is.
Which conditioning have you rejected.
Is it necessary that one must reject a background to be an atheist?
Luckily, I was raised with no religious influences and came to atheism
naturally. My parents claim to be Christian, but oddly enough, the subject
of god never came up in the household while I was being raised.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Matthew" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species...? |
02 Nov 2003 10:51:37 AM |
|
|
"Mylon" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:ZS9pb.96817$Go5.1783745@twister.tampabay.rr.com...
"Matthew" <mlonergan@netspace.net.au> wrote in message
news:bo2i1a$g21$1@otis.netspace.net.au...
You say are an athiest but i have yet to here of what your background
is.
Which conditioning have you rejected.
Is it necessary that one must reject a background to be an atheist?
Luckily, I was raised with no religious influences and came to atheism
naturally. My parents claim to be Christian, but oddly enough, the
subject
of god never came up in the household while I was being raised.
reinsert
el: "This is a misconception, people usually do not choose their
religion but is chosen for them (primarily by their parents) as they
grow up resulting from mental conditioning. So, they do not have
freedom of thought. Even when mature and it is pointed out to them that
their religion (insert any) is man-made they are so conditioned that it
is difficult to override their beliefs with logic and common sense and
written history."
because this suggests that the topic is overcoming mental conditioning.
Background of the author helps gain insight into the nature of the argument.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mylon" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species...? |
02 Nov 2003 08:40:51 PM |
|
|
"Matthew" <mlonergan@netspace.net.au> wrote in message
news:bo3cmu$2nb3$1@otis.netspace.net.au...
"Mylon" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:ZS9pb.96817$Go5.1783745@twister.tampabay.rr.com...
"Matthew" <mlonergan@netspace.net.au> wrote in message
news:bo2i1a$g21$1@otis.netspace.net.au...
You say are an athiest but i have yet to here of what your background
is.
Which conditioning have you rejected.
Is it necessary that one must reject a background to be an atheist?
Luckily, I was raised with no religious influences and came to atheism
naturally. My parents claim to be Christian, but oddly enough, the
subject
of god never came up in the household while I was being raised.
reinsert
el: "This is a misconception, people usually do not choose their
religion but is chosen for them (primarily by their parents) as they
grow up resulting from mental conditioning. So, they do not have
freedom of thought. Even when mature and it is pointed out to them that
their religion (insert any) is man-made they are so conditioned that it
is difficult to override their beliefs with logic and common sense and
written history."
because this suggests that the topic is overcoming mental conditioning.
Background of the author helps gain insight into the nature of the
argument.
I won't refute El's statement, but I was trying to say that religion never
came up in my household. My parents never told me any of the refutations to
god's existance, nor did they ever try and tell me anything in particular
about god. Thus, I will refute the claim that I was conditioned with
regards to religion.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Thurston Phoremost" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species...? |
02 Nov 2003 02:34:30 PM |
|
|
"Matthew" <mlonergan@netspace.net.au> wrote in message news:<bo2i1a$g21$1@otis.netspace.net.au>...
"E. L." <nyceddie@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:6721-3FA4184D-248@storefull-2373.public.lawson.webtv.net...
Ewwwww... webtv, eh? <shudder>
Never mind, there's a couple of interesting points in this post.
....
That is jews are the least protected species. The are therefore one of the
most resiliant. Those that are most protected such as royalty are the least
resiliant.
This is very true, (or at least it was true until very recently) and
is an idea that is far too subtle and elegant for most of the buffoons
here to arrive at independently. Hence it is necessary for it to be
spoonfed to them, in such a way that at least a small minority of them
will be capable of understanding. I'll attempt to do that now.
Simply put, Jews are what they are because of the continual harassment
they have suffered throughout history at the hands of christians and
others.
The simplest way of explaining this is to say, "If you keep putting
obstacles in the path of a certain group of people, eventually that
group of people become very good at surmounting obstacles".
But things have changed, and the pendulum has swung far the other way,
and now, the jews in many parts of the world are the most protected
species. In many parts of Europe, for instance, you can actually be
put in jail for saying something that offends "a jew" or "the jews".
And by the looks of things, it may soon also be illegal in the USA to
disagree with a jew, 1st amendment or no 1st amendment.
Those who can do those who cant rule. It has always been the way to keep the
wealthy and powerful ignorant. Those that have power invariably find that.
Jews are what they are because of the continual harassment they have
suffered throughout history at the hands of christians and others.
It is also true that the continual harassment the jews have suffered
throughout history at the hands of christians and others is due to the
way that jews behave.
So are we looking at a "chicken and egg" situation here?
No.
What we also need to realize is that, all through history, jews have
deliberately made themselves different to the rest of us in order to
gain significant competitive advantage.
The two main methods they have used to acheive this
competitive advantage are -
1. Eugenics, and
2. A very strong cultural emphasis on literacy and education.
3. Fear, surprise, and an almost fanatical devotion to... er...
Anyway, google out Prof. Kevin Macdonald's website to find out all
about jewish eugenics, and how the jewish "race" throughout history
has deliberately set out to make itself different to the rest of us.
It really is fascinating reading.
The methods that the jews use to improve the quality of their "master
race" are methods that we should all be trying to emulate. After all,
nothing succeeds like success, right?
T.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Karen J" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species...? |
03 Nov 2003 09:56:48 PM |
|
|
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote in message news:<acb7fa96.0311021234.7aa9c02b@posting.google.com>...
Jews are what they are because of the continual harassment they have
suffered throughout history at the hands of christians and others.
It is also true that the continual harassment the jews have suffered
throughout history at the hands of christians and others is due to the
way that jews behave.
So are we looking at a "chicken and egg" situation here?
No.
What we also need to realize is that, all through history, jews have
deliberately made themselves different to the rest of us in order to
gain significant competitive advantage.
According to Kevin Macdonald, it is perfectly natural for
humans to become clannish-ethnocentric if they have lived
in civilization for awhile. WE EUROPEANS are the strange
ones. We went straight form uncivilized, harsh-environment
(sociobiologically) natural pair-bonding and then stumbled
into the (sociobiologically) UNSTABLE Socially Imposed
Monogamy of the Greeks/Romans/Catholic Church. SIM is
unstable because if one group forms a clan they will have
advantages, and generally defeat everyone who doesn't do
likewise.
According to Macdonald, our monogamy, excessive altruism,
and individualism are headed for the dustbin of history.
Unless we somehow transcend natural sociobiological forces.
I personally think that we SHOULD try to transcend those
sociobiological forces and join Peter Singer and Eliot
Katz (two of the foremost Animal Welfare activists – both
Jews by the way – I believe – at least Katz's name
sounds Jewish to me).
But how do we avoid the sociobiological law of gravity (people
living in civilization are attracted to clans-ethnocentrism)?
Three Ingredients:
1) Fear the gods. It'll motivate you. Hans Moravec proved the
gods exist in his article "Pigs in Cyberspace"
written in 1992. The Jews don't believe in God, so they no
longer fear him, and will be less motivated.
2) Be kind to animals. Kosher no longer seems to mean kindness
to animals that it once did. So we have a real morality – all
they have is ethnocentrism/eugenics.
3) Eugenics: Give extra status to the ability to read and remember
what you've read. The Jews already proved that it's a good
natural form of eugenics.
Then hopefully we can beat the Jews to the singularity.
(If quantum difficulties delay it a few hundred years.)
And rule the world with the meta-golden rule.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
