Maybe these Xtians are useful after all?



 Religions > Atheism > Maybe these Xtians are useful after all?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 29

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 

8

 

9

 

10

 

11

 

12

 

13

 

14

 

15

 

16

 

17

 

18

 

19

 

20

 

21

 

22

 

23

 

24

 

25

 

26

 

27

 

28

 

29

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Thurston Phoremost"
Date: 17 Oct 2003 03:01:10 AM
Object: Maybe these Xtians are useful after all?
Department of Credit Where Credit Due Dept?
http://www.gospelcom.net/moh/WinkPrat/DTM/ContractOnChildrenPart2.htm
(...)
Yet a protected childhood is a relatively new thing, introduced by
Christian reformers. Only a century ago, children in England were made
to work in coal mines because they were considered the only ones with
bones flexible enough for the horrifying conditions. Imagine the
terror of their days in the mine shafts.
Human Flesh Was Cheaper
The simplest job was being a "trapper." A child was lowered 50 feet
down a shaft to squat in the mud in total darkness with trickling
water, beetles, and rats, waiting to open the trap door for other
children pulling coal cars. He would let the coal through and then
close the trap door again. That way, if there was a mine explosion, it
only killed the children between the doors. The trap doors cut off the
exploding gas from spreading further. Little children, seven or eight
years old, would sit in the dark every day, sometimes 18 to 20 hours,
listening for the coal cars. Some went insane. Yet in the mines, that
was the best job.
The children suffered terrible cruelty at the hands of adults, who
bargained for them, used them, and dismissed them as they pleased.
Many working underground were only eight or nine years old, girls as
well as boys. Some began toiling in the pits when they were only four
or five. They only saw the sun on Sundays. There were no hours of
relaxation, their meals were mostly eaten in the dark, and they lived
with parents who devoted them to this life.
Think about the actual pulling of the coal cars. Women or small
children had to crawl on their hands and knees dragging enormous
weights along narrow passageways that were only 18 to 24 inches in
height, and were as wet and slimy as common sewers. Women remained at
this work until the last hour of pregnancy. Boys and girls performed
the work by using a girdle and chain. A girdle was put around their
naked waist. A chain from the carriage was hooked to the girdle and
passed between their legs. Crawling on hands and knees they drew the
carriages after them.
"It is not necessary to describe," says Shaftesbury, the Christian
politician who fought against this horror for most of his life, "how
their sides were blistered, their ankles stained, their backs chafed
from rubbing against the roofs, or how they stumbled in the darkness
and choked in the stifling atmosphere. It is enough to say they were
obliged to do the work of horses or other beasts of the field, only
because human flesh and blood was cheaper in some cases and horse
labor was impossible in others."
(...)
.

User: "JTEM"

Title: Re: Maybe these Xtians are useful after all? 17 Oct 2003 09:03:29 AM
"Thurston Phoremost" <thurston_phoremost@hotmail.com> wrote

Yet a protected childhood is a relatively new thing, introduced
by Christian reformers. Only a century ago, children in England
were made to work in coal mines because they were
considered the only ones with bones flexible enough for the
horrifying conditions. Imagine the terror of their days in the
mine shafts.

The gaping hole in your logic (big enough to fly an entire squadron
on B-52s through) is your assumption that the parents, the mine
owners and adult employees were all atheists.
They weren't.
.
User: "Thurston Phoremost"

Title: Re: Maybe these Xtians are useful after all? 18 Oct 2003 12:26:04 AM
"JTEM" <jaytem@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<lZidnfXYLtiUaxKiRVn-gg@comcast.com>...

"Thurston Phoremost" <thurston_phoremost@hotmail.com> wrote

Yet a protected childhood is a relatively new thing, introduced
by Christian reformers. Only a century ago, children in England
were made to work in coal mines because they were
considered the only ones with bones flexible enough for the
horrifying conditions. Imagine the terror of their days in the
mine shafts.


The gaping hole in your logic (big enough to fly an entire squadron
on B-52s through) is your assumption that the parents, the mine
owners and adult employees were all atheists.

I think there might be a gaping hole in your head, because I never
assumed that the mine owners were all atheists.
I assumed they were capitalists.


They weren't.

The hell you say. :)
T.
.
User: "JTEM"

Title: Re: Maybe these Xtians are useful after all? 18 Oct 2003 10:11:17 PM
"Thurston Phoremost" <thurston_phoremost@hotmail.com> wrote

I think there might be a gaping hole in your head, because
I never assumed that the mine owners were all atheists.

You might want to re-read your own article, starting with the
Subject: line.
From this end of things, you look like a frigging jackass.
.
User: "Thurston Phoremost"

Title: Re: Maybe these Xtians are useful after all? 19 Oct 2003 01:47:44 PM
"JTEM" <jaytem@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<0bGdndmfbdexnQ-iRVn-tg@comcast.com>...

"Thurston Phoremost" <thurston_phoremost@hotmail.com> wrote

I think there might be a gaping hole in your head, because
I never assumed that the mine owners were all atheists.


You might want to re-read your own article, starting with the
Subject: line.

I just did. Hmm, nothing there about mine owners being atheists.


From this end of things, you look like a frigging jackass.

Nope, sorry, it's you who looks a bit silly, because there's nothing
there about mine owners being atheists.
T.
.




User: "quibbler"

Title: Re: Maybe these Xtians are useful after all? 17 Oct 2003 10:30:12 PM
In article <acb7fa96.0310162305.1e2b3001@posting.google.com>,
thurston_phoremost@hotmail.com says...

They only saw the sun on Sundays.

Oh boy, and I bet they got to waste a good part of that day off in
a fucking church. BTW, it sounds like they were already xians, since
Jews and muslims usually celebrate on Saturday and Friday respectively.
But we knew that brits were xians anyway. In fact, most of them were
probably good anglicans. I wonder what xian impulse possessed them to
oppress these kids in the first place.
--
_____________________________________________________
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.
User: "William Klee"

Title: Re: Maybe these Xtians are useful after all? 18 Oct 2003 10:23:57 AM
In article <MPG.19fa5a68313831e698a275@news.cis.dfn.de>, quibbler
<quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote:

In article <acb7fa96.0310162305.1e2b3001@posting.google.com>,
thurston_phoremost@hotmail.com says...


They only saw the sun on Sundays.


Oh boy, and I bet they got to waste a good part of that day off in
a fucking church. BTW, it sounds like they were already xians, since
Jews and muslims usually celebrate on Saturday and Friday respectively.
But we knew that brits were xians anyway. In fact, most of them were
probably good anglicans. I wonder what xian impulse possessed them to
oppress these kids in the first place.

One of, if not the, greatest christian impulses: greed. Raw, naked
greed.
.
User: "Thurston Phoremost"

Title: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? 28 Oct 2003 04:35:39 AM
I've noticed a double double standard standard here in alt.atheism.
It seems you can say anything you like about christians here. You can
abuse, ridicule, cuss - in fact, even the most vile bigoted
invective-laden stereotype , if aimed by atheists at christians, is
perfectly acceptable.
But as soon as you mention that Jew$ are often thought of as being a
bit greedy, well, suddenly you are persona non grata, and are plonked
by every hypocrite wanker in the newsgroup.
Can someone explain to me why it is OK to malign christians, but not
OK to say anything against Jew$?
What follows is an "acceptable" posting in alt.atheism -
William Klee <fnord2k@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<181020031023573322%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...

In article <MPG.19fa5a68313831e698a275@news.cis.dfn.de>, quibbler
<quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote:

In article <acb7fa96.0310162305.1e2b3001@posting.google.com>,
thurston_phoremost@hotmail.com says...


They only saw the sun on Sundays.


Oh boy, and I bet they got to waste a good part of that day off in
a fucking church. BTW, it sounds like they were already xians, since
Jews and muslims usually celebrate on Saturday and Friday respectively.
But we knew that brits were xians anyway. In fact, most of them were
probably good anglicans. I wonder what xian impulse possessed them to
oppress these kids in the first place.


One of, if not the, greatest christian impulses: greed. Raw, naked
greed.

.
User: "William Klee"

Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? 28 Oct 2003 06:51:24 PM
In article <acb7fa96.0310280235.6ee40677@posting.google.com>, Thurston
Phoremost <thurston_phoremost@hotmail.com> wrote:
Top-posting git.

I've noticed a double double standard standard here in alt.atheism.

So have I. Atheists back up what they say and xians don't.

It seems you can say anything you like about christians here. You can
abuse, ridicule, cuss - in fact, even the most vile bigoted
invective-laden stereotype , if aimed by atheists at christians, is
perfectly acceptable.

Oddly enough, I post in alt.atheism, not
alt.don't.you.dare.offend.an.xian

But as soon as you mention that Jew$ are often thought of as being a
bit greedy, well, suddenly you are persona non grata, and are plonked
by every hypocrite wanker in the newsgroup.

Actually, it was your refusal/inability to back up your assinine claim.

Can someone explain to me why it is OK to malign christians, but not
OK to say anything against Jew$?

A: Condemning one religion is not promoting another.
B: When Jews bother me like christians do, I'll slag them, too.

What follows is an "acceptable" posting in alt.atheism -



William Klee <fnord2k@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<181020031023573322%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...

In article <MPG.19fa5a68313831e698a275@news.cis.dfn.de>, quibbler
<quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote:

In article <acb7fa96.0310162305.1e2b3001@posting.google.com>,
thurston_phoremost@hotmail.com says...


They only saw the sun on Sundays.


Oh boy, and I bet they got to waste a good part of that day off in
a fucking church. BTW, it sounds like they were already xians, since
Jews and muslims usually celebrate on Saturday and Friday respectively.
But we knew that brits were xians anyway. In fact, most of them were
probably good anglicans. I wonder what xian impulse possessed them to
oppress these kids in the first place.


One of, if not the, greatest christian impulses: greed. Raw, naked
greed.

.

User: "Barry OGrady"

Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? 28 Oct 2003 08:29:54 PM
On 28 Oct 2003 02:35:39 -0800,
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:

I've noticed a double double standard standard here in alt.atheism.

It seems you can say anything you like about christians here. You can
abuse, ridicule, cuss - in fact, even the most vile bigoted
invective-laden stereotype , if aimed by atheists at christians, is
perfectly acceptable.

But as soon as you mention that Jew$ are often thought of as being a
bit greedy, well, suddenly you are persona non grata, and are plonked
by every hypocrite wanker in the newsgroup.

Can someone explain to me why it is OK to malign christians, but not
OK to say anything against Jew$?

Jews work very hard to suppress free speech about themselves so that they can
continue with their plans of world domination unhindered.
Anybody who supports the jews is putting themselves willingly into slavery.

What follows is an "acceptable" posting in alt.atheism -



William Klee <fnord2k@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<181020031023573322%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...

In article <MPG.19fa5a68313831e698a275@news.cis.dfn.de>, quibbler
<quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote:

In article <acb7fa96.0310162305.1e2b3001@posting.google.com>,

says...


They only saw the sun on Sundays.


Oh boy, and I bet they got to waste a good part of that day off in
a fucking church. BTW, it sounds like they were already xians, since
Jews and muslims usually celebrate on Saturday and Friday respectively.
But we knew that brits were xians anyway. In fact, most of them were
probably good anglicans. I wonder what xian impulse possessed them to
oppress these kids in the first place.


One of, if not the, greatest christian impulses: greed. Raw, naked
greed.

-Barry
========
Web page: http://members.optusnet.com.au/~barry.og
Atheist, radio scanner, LIPD information.
Voicemail/fax number +14136227640
.
User: "Enkidu"

Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? 28 Oct 2003 08:48:58 PM
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
"Barry OGrady" <god_freee_jones@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:jg9upvg6fck6iq9tvebhejnsru5srncun4@4ax.com...


Jews work very hard to suppress free speech about themselves so that they
can continue with their plans of world domination unhindered.

Never had a jew suppress my freedom of speech. How have they stopped you
from expressing yourself. Just because you don't find your views spoutted
from every newspaper and radio station doesn't mean that your view is
suppressed buy some Jewish "plan of world domination ". It could be that
your opinion is unfounded, supported by no evidence, you are an idiot
unwilling or unable to face the work required to succeed on your own, or to
face the limitations your puny intellect place on you.
No, I'm not Jewish.
Enkidu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 6.5.8ckt http://www.ipgpp.com/
Comment: KeyID: 0x4F366721
iQA/AwUBP58qmYTItnFPNmchEQJKqwCfeNe1WeJhF7MKNdUPUwtWwdITlowAn3f4
BWfhSrQQd2sF7g0kYhtRbCRm
=pTOj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
User: "Thurston Phoremost"

Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? 30 Oct 2003 02:53:09 AM
"Enkidu" <Enkidu@spam.me.not> wrote in message news:<eUFnb.45966$gi2.34224@fed1read01>...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

"Barry OGrady" <god_freee_jones@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:jg9upvg6fck6iq9tvebhejnsru5srncun4@4ax.com...


Jews work very hard to suppress free speech about themselves so that they
can continue with their plans of world domination unhindered.


Never had a jew suppress my freedom of speech. How have they stopped you
from expressing yourself. Just because you don't find your views spoutted
from every newspaper and radio station doesn't mean that your view is
suppressed buy some Jewish "plan of world domination ". It could be that
your opinion is unfounded, supported by no evidence, you are an idiot
unwilling or unable to face the work required to succeed on your own, or to
face the limitations your puny intellect place on you.

Oh yeah? Well, I bet you're just one more of those greedy, lying Jew$.

No, I'm not Jewish.

Oh.
Well, in that case, you're one of their brainwashed useful idiots.
T.
.


User: "Keenan Clay Wilkie"

Title: Re: Are Jew$ a protected species in alt.atheism? 31 Oct 2003 01:27:45 AM
Barry OGrady <god_freee_jones@hotmail.com> writes:

On 28 Oct 2003 02:35:39 -0800,

(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:

I've noticed a double double standard standard here in alt.atheism.

It seems you can say anything you like about christians here. You can
abuse, ridicule, cuss - in fact, even the most vile bigoted
invective-laden stereotype , if aimed by atheists at christians, is
perfectly acceptable.

But as soon as you mention that Jew$ are often thought of as being a
bit greedy, well, suddenly you are persona non grata, and are plonked
by every hypocrite wanker in the newsgroup.

Can someone explain to me why it is OK to malign christians, but not
OK to say anything against Jew$?

Jews work very hard to suppress free speech about themselves so that they can
continue with their plans of world domination unhindered.
Anybody who supports the jews is putting themselves willingly into slavery.

Not content to bash Jews alone, Thurston Phoremost has taken to forging
Barry's name onto his postings, committing an act of fraud.
Bigots typically don't care about breaking the law to further their
agenda, it seems.
--
See the documented lies of Pastor Frank: http://tinyurl.com/6009
Who said that SPEWS was dead? http://spews.org/
Back To The Future DVD Warning: http://tinyurl.com/6007
d a r k s t a r @ i g l o u . c o m | atheist #29
.
User: "Thurston Phoremost"

Title: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism 31 Oct 2003 02:01:54 PM
FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism
- #1 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #2 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #3 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #4 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #5 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #6 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #7 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #8 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #9 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #10 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
darkstar@shell1.iglou.com (Keenan Clay Wilkie) wrote in message news:<3fa20ef1_1@news.iglou.com>...

Barry OGrady <god_freee_jones@hotmail.com> writes:

On 28 Oct 2003 02:35:39 -0800,

(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:


I've noticed a double double standard standard here in alt.atheism.

It seems you can say anything you like about christians here. You can
abuse, ridicule, cuss - in fact, even the most vile bigoted
invective-laden stereotype , if aimed by atheists at christians, is
perfectly acceptable.

But as soon as you mention that Jew$ are often thought of as being a
bit greedy, well, suddenly you are persona non grata, and are plonked
by every hypocrite wanker in the newsgroup.

Can someone explain to me why it is OK to malign christians, but not
OK to say anything against Jew$?


Jews work very hard to suppress free speech about themselves so that they can
continue with their plans of world domination unhindered.
Anybody who supports the jews is putting themselves willingly into slavery.


Not content to bash Jews alone,

Would you prefer it if I only bashed xtians, just like you do?
Why? Is there a clause in the alt.atheism faq which forbids the
criticism of jew$?
Jew$ genuflect before the same idiotic butal god that the xtians do,
you know. Does this not mean that they are fair game too?
<idiotic accusations snipped>
.
User: "Orhan Orgun"

Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism 31 Oct 2003 05:00:38 PM
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote in message news:<acb7fa96.0310311201.48165f21@posting.google.com>...


Why? Is there a clause in the alt.atheism faq which forbids the
criticism of jew$?

Jew$ genuflect before the same idiotic butal god that the xtians do,
you know. Does this not mean that they are fair game too?

It's probably because Jews don't tend to come to aa and proselytize.
That is one thing people here seem to hate.
A related reason is that here in the US (where I imagine most of the
xian-basher posters reside) it is not Jews that do their utmost to
turn the country into a theocracy by destroying just about everything
that is good about this society.
IOW, I imagine all the anti-xian rhetoric you see on aa is
*reactive*--it is a response to attempts (at times terrifyingly
successful) by some xians to ***** us all all over.
You know, you also don't see much anti-Buddhist, anti-Hindu,
anti-Shinto, etc. stuff posted here either. The generalization is
reasonably clear, isn't it? If you keep your religion out of *my*
life, you are not my enemy.
.

User: "Kermit"

Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism 31 Oct 2003 05:41:37 PM
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote in message news:<acb7fa96.0310311201.48165f21@posting.google.com>...

FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism

- #1 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #2 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #3 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #4 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #5 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #6 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #7 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #8 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #9 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #10 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.



darkstar@shell1.iglou.com (Keenan Clay Wilkie) wrote in message news:<3fa20ef1_1@news.iglou.com>...

Barry OGrady <god_freee_jones@hotmail.com> writes:

On 28 Oct 2003 02:35:39 -0800,

(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:


I've noticed a double double standard standard here in alt.atheism.

It seems you can say anything you like about christians here. You can
abuse, ridicule, cuss - in fact, even the most vile bigoted
invective-laden stereotype , if aimed by atheists at christians, is
perfectly acceptable.

But as soon as you mention that Jew$ are often thought of as being a
bit greedy, well, suddenly you are persona non grata, and are plonked
by every hypocrite wanker in the newsgroup.

Can someone explain to me why it is OK to malign christians, but not
OK to say anything against Jew$?


Jews work very hard to suppress free speech about themselves so that they can
continue with their plans of world domination unhindered.
Anybody who supports the jews is putting themselves willingly into slavery.


Not content to bash Jews alone,


Would you prefer it if I only bashed xtians, just like you do?

Why? Is there a clause in the alt.atheism faq which forbids the
criticism of jew$?

Jew$ genuflect before the same idiotic butal god that the xtians do,
you know. Does this not mean that they are fair game too?

<idiotic accusations snipped>

You are being disingenuous if you claim that you are unaware of the
confusion between the Jewish religion and the Jewish people. Also,
most of us wait until someone comes here and says something stupid in
a religious context (if it's not in a religious context, then hteir
being Jewish (in either sense)) is unlikely to come up.
Do you have anything to say, or are you just going to keep whining
that we're not bashing your favorite target enough?
--- Kermit
.
User: "Thurston Phoremost"

Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism 31 Oct 2003 10:01:34 PM
(Kermit) wrote in message news:<1575bfdc.0310311541.18b8d987@posting.google.com>...
....


Do you have anything to say, or are you just going to keep whining
that we're not bashing your favorite target enough?

If you had a brain, you'd realize that I don't give a flying *****
whether or not you bash the jews.
I'll type this slowly.
I believe that if you want to bash the christians, because you think
they're all absolute fuckheads, then more power to you.
Knock yourself out.
You can bash the moslems and hindus too, that's great.
Same with me, if there's some idiot or bunch of idiots that are
invoking their god as an excuse and a justification to behave badly,
then I will bash them, regardless of what name they put on their
mindfuck religion, or how many years it's been going, or how many
adherents it's got. I'm an equal opportunity atheist.
Is that a simple enough explanation for you?
If not, then why don't you just *****, and be offended somewhere
else? It wouldn't matter to me. I wouldn't miss you, honestly.
T.
.
User: "Kermit"

Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism 02 Nov 2003 01:17:53 AM
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote in message news:<acb7fa96.0310312001.6ac67956@posting.google.com>...

freehand_THX1138@hotmail.com (Kermit) wrote in message news:<1575bfdc.0310311541.18b8d987@posting.google.com>...
...


Do you have anything to say, or are you just going to keep whining
that we're not bashing your favorite target enough?


If you had a brain, you'd realize that I don't give a flying *****
whether or not you bash the jews.

So you were just *practice whining with that first post, and picked
the Jews as a target out of a hat?

I'll type this slowly.

I believe that if you want to bash the christians, because you think
they're all absolute fuckheads, then more power to you.

I don't think they all are.


Knock yourself out.

You can bash the moslems and hindus too, that's great.

When they come here and say something stupid, or when I notice them
doing something stupid; I have.


Same with me, if there's some idiot or bunch of idiots that are
invoking their god as an excuse and a justification to behave badly,
then I will bash them, regardless of what name they put on their
mindfuck religion, or how many years it's been going, or how many
adherents it's got. I'm an equal opportunity atheist.

Is that a simple enough explanation for you?

Sure. It doesn't jibe with your first post, however, nor with most of
your subsequent ones.


If not, then why don't you just *****, and be offended somewhere
else? It wouldn't matter to me. I wouldn't miss you, honestly.

I like it here. Why don't *you go away, take a long walk, read a book,
then come back when you see someone do or say something stupid? We'll
agree and complain about the quote/link/whatever pretty
enthusiastically.


T.

--- Kermit
.
User: "Thurston Phoremost"

Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism 02 Nov 2003 05:55:23 AM
(Kermit) wrote in message news:<1575bfdc.0311012317.12630af@posting.google.com>...

thurston_phoremost@hotmail.com (Thurston Phoremost) wrote in message news:<acb7fa96.0310312001.6ac67956@posting.google.com>...

(Kermit) wrote in message news:<1575bfdc.0310311541.18b8d987@posting.google.com>...
...


Do you have anything to say, or are you just going to keep whining
that we're not bashing your favorite target enough?


If you had a brain, you'd realize that I don't give a flying *****
whether or not you bash the jews.


So you were just *practice whining with that first post, and picked
the Jews as a target out of a hat?

Eh? What makes you think I was whining about anything?
I repeat - If you had a brain, you'd realize that I don't give a
flying *****
whether or not you bash the jews.
Which part of that don't you understand?


I'll type this slowly.

I believe that if you want to bash the christians, because you think
they're all absolute fuckheads, then more power to you.


I don't think they all are.

Well, all I can say is that you must have been mixing with a better
class of christaceans than I have.



Knock yourself out.

You can bash the moslems and hindus too, that's great.


When they come here and say something stupid, or when I notice them
doing something stupid; I have.

Really? I'll have to do a google to see if you're telling the truth
about that.



Same with me, if there's some idiot or bunch of idiots that are
invoking their god as an excuse and a justification to behave badly,
then I will bash them, regardless of what name they put on their
mindfuck religion, or how many years it's been going, or how many
adherents it's got. I'm an equal opportunity atheist.

Is that a simple enough explanation for you?


Sure. It doesn't jibe with your first post, however, nor with most of
your subsequent ones.

I can't help it if you haven't the brains to follow what's going on.



If not, then why don't you just *****, and be offended somewhere
else? It wouldn't matter to me. I wouldn't miss you, honestly.


I like it here. Why don't *you go away, take a long walk, read a book,
then come back when you see someone do or say something stupid?

You mean I should come back every time you post something?

We'll
agree and complain about the quote/link/whatever pretty
enthusiastically.

So you're saying it's OK to give the Jews an occasional broadside
then?
T.
.



User: "Thurston Phoremost"

Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism 31 Oct 2003 09:46:37 PM
(Kermit) wrote in message news:<1575bfdc.0310311541.18b8d987@posting.google.com>...

(Thurston Phoremost) wrote in message news:<acb7fa96.0310311201.48165f21@posting.google.com>...

FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism

- #1 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #2 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #3 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #4 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #5 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #6 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #7 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #8 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #9 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #10 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.



darkstar@shell1.iglou.com (Keenan Clay Wilkie) wrote in message news:<3fa20ef1_1@news.iglou.com>...

Barry OGrady <god_freee_jones@hotmail.com> writes:

On 28 Oct 2003 02:35:39 -0800,

(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:


I've noticed a double double standard standard here in alt.atheism.

It seems you can say anything you like about christians here. You can
abuse, ridicule, cuss - in fact, even the most vile bigoted
invective-laden stereotype , if aimed by atheists at christians, is
perfectly acceptable.

But as soon as you mention that Jew$ are often thought of as being a
bit greedy, well, suddenly you are persona non grata, and are plonked
by every hypocrite wanker in the newsgroup.

Can someone explain to me why it is OK to malign christians, but not
OK to say anything against Jew$?


Jews work very hard to suppress free speech about themselves so that they can
continue with their plans of world domination unhindered.
Anybody who supports the jews is putting themselves willingly into slavery.


Not content to bash Jews alone,


Would you prefer it if I only bashed xtians, just like you do?

Why? Is there a clause in the alt.atheism faq which forbids the
criticism of jew$?

Jew$ genuflect before the same idiotic butal god that the xtians do,
you know. Does this not mean that they are fair game too?

<idiotic accusations snipped>


You are being disingenuous if you claim that you are unaware of the
confusion between the Jewish religion and the Jewish people.

Well, I apologize for appearing to be unsympathetic about the fact
that you suffer from some confusion between the Jewish religion and
the Jewish people. How can I help? Why don't you relax here on this
couch and tell me all about it? When did you first start having these
feelings of confusion?

Also,
most of us wait until someone comes here and says something stupid in
a religious context (if it's not in a religious context, then hteir
being Jewish (in either sense)) is unlikely to come up.

Right, so if we feel disgusted about the genocide being comitted by
the fundamentalist jewish theocracy, Israel, and if we're disgusted
about the fact that the American taxpayer is financing it, we can
comment on it in a.a.
However, before doing so, we first to have wait for a self-identified
jewish poster in alt.atheism to say something stupid before we can
post any such criticism?
Gee. Something tells me that the genuine FAQ for this group would be a
real hoot.


Do you have anything to say, or are you just going to keep whining
that we're not bashing your favorite target enough?

I'm just going to keep pointing out your lies and hypocrisy until you
start to re-evaluate some of your prejudices.
And by the looks of things, that could take quite some time.
T.
.
User: "Kermit"

Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism 02 Nov 2003 01:06:32 AM
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote in message news:<acb7fa96.0310311946.665fcade@posting.google.com>...

freehand_THX1138@hotmail.com (Kermit) wrote in message news:<1575bfdc.0310311541.18b8d987@posting.google.com>...

(Thurston Phoremost) wrote in message news:<acb7fa96.0310311201.48165f21@posting.google.com>...

FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism

- #1 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #2 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #3 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #4 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #5 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #6 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #7 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #8 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #9 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #10 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.



darkstar@shell1.iglou.com (Keenan Clay Wilkie) wrote in message news:<3fa20ef1_1@news.iglou.com>...

Barry OGrady <god_freee_jones@hotmail.com> writes:

On 28 Oct 2003 02:35:39 -0800,

(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:


I've noticed a double double standard standard here in alt.atheism.

It seems you can say anything you like about christians here. You can
abuse, ridicule, cuss - in fact, even the most vile bigoted
invective-laden stereotype , if aimed by atheists at christians, is
perfectly acceptable.

But as soon as you mention that Jew$ are often thought of as being a
bit greedy, well, suddenly you are persona non grata, and are plonked
by every hypocrite wanker in the newsgroup.

Can someone explain to me why it is OK to malign christians, but not
OK to say anything against Jew$?


Jews work very hard to suppress free speech about themselves so that they can
continue with their plans of world domination unhindered.
Anybody who supports the jews is putting themselves willingly into slavery.


Not content to bash Jews alone,


Would you prefer it if I only bashed xtians, just like you do?

Why? Is there a clause in the alt.atheism faq which forbids the
criticism of jew$?

Jew$ genuflect before the same idiotic butal god that the xtians do,
you know. Does this not mean that they are fair game too?

<idiotic accusations snipped>


You are being disingenuous if you claim that you are unaware of the
confusion between the Jewish religion and the Jewish people.


Well, I apologize for appearing to be unsympathetic about the fact
that you suffer from some confusion between the Jewish religion and
the Jewish people. How can I help? Why don't you relax here on this
couch and tell me all about it? When did you first start having these
feelings of confusion?

Also,
most of us wait until someone comes here and says something stupid in
a religious context (if it's not in a religious context, then hteir
being Jewish (in either sense)) is unlikely to come up.


Right, so if we feel disgusted about the genocide being comitted by
the fundamentalist jewish theocracy, Israel, and if we're disgusted
about the fact that the American taxpayer is financing it, we can
comment on it in a.a.

However, before doing so, we first to have wait for a self-identified
jewish poster in alt.atheism to say something stupid before we can
post any such criticism?

Gee. Something tells me that the genuine FAQ for this group would be a
real hoot.


Do you have anything to say, or are you just going to keep whining
that we're not bashing your favorite target enough?


I'm just going to keep pointing out your lies and hypocrisy until you
start to re-evaluate some of your prejudices.

And by the looks of things, that could take quite some time.

T.

Interesting that you think you could instruct anyone about prejudices.
Jewish idiocy, especially the fundamentalist beliefs of the
ultra-Orthodox, are frequently mentioned here. But rather than quote
some such idoit, or mention a recent religious-inspired unreasonable
event, you barge in complaining that we aren't bashing them enough.
Your whining isn't sufficient reason to bash anyone.
What, for example, is with the childish dollar sign in word "Jews"?
Racial epithets, deliberate conflating of ethnicity with religion,
using that medieval cowardly and dishonest claim that they are
obssessed with money... you give every sign of being a grade-A jerk.
Grow up, go away, and shut your yap. Not necessarily in that order.
--- Kermit
.
User: "Thurston Phoremost"

Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism 02 Nov 2003 06:31:30 AM
(Kermit) wrote in message news:<1575bfdc.0311012306.27f29f5e@posting.google.com>...

(Thurston Phoremost) wrote in message news:<acb7fa96.0310311946.665fcade@posting.google.com>...

(Kermit) wrote in message news:<1575bfdc.0310311541.18b8d987@posting.google.com>...

(Thurston Phoremost) wrote in message news:<acb7fa96.0310311201.48165f21@posting.google.com>...

FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism

- #1 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #2 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #3 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #4 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #5 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #6 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #7 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #8 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #9 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #10 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.



darkstar@shell1.iglou.com (Keenan Clay Wilkie) wrote in message news:<3fa20ef1_1@news.iglou.com>...

Barry OGrady <god_freee_jones@hotmail.com> writes:

On 28 Oct 2003 02:35:39 -0800,

(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:


I've noticed a double double standard standard here in alt.atheism.

It seems you can say anything you like about christians here. You can
abuse, ridicule, cuss - in fact, even the most vile bigoted
invective-laden stereotype , if aimed by atheists at christians, is
perfectly acceptable.

But as soon as you mention that Jew$ are often thought of as being a
bit greedy, well, suddenly you are persona non grata, and are plonked
by every hypocrite wanker in the newsgroup.

Can someone explain to me why it is OK to malign christians, but not
OK to say anything against Jew$?


Jews work very hard to suppress free speech about themselves so that they can
continue with their plans of world domination unhindered.
Anybody who supports the jews is putting themselves willingly into slavery.


Not content to bash Jews alone,


Would you prefer it if I only bashed xtians, just like you do?

Why? Is there a clause in the alt.atheism faq which forbids the
criticism of jew$?

Jew$ genuflect before the same idiotic butal god that the xtians do,
you know. Does this not mean that they are fair game too?

<idiotic accusations snipped>


You are being disingenuous if you claim that you are unaware of the
confusion between the Jewish religion and the Jewish people.


Well, I apologize for appearing to be unsympathetic about the fact
that you suffer from some confusion between the Jewish religion and
the Jewish people. How can I help? Why don't you relax here on this
couch and tell me all about it? When did you first start having these
feelings of confusion?

Also,
most of us wait until someone comes here and says something stupid in
a religious context (if it's not in a religious context, then hteir
being Jewish (in either sense)) is unlikely to come up.


Right, so if we feel disgusted about the genocide being comitted by
the fundamentalist jewish theocracy, Israel, and if we're disgusted
about the fact that the American taxpayer is financing it, we can
comment on it in a.a.

However, before doing so, we first to have wait for a self-identified
jewish poster in alt.atheism to say something stupid before we can
post any such criticism?

Gee. Something tells me that the genuine FAQ for this group would be a
real hoot.


Do you have anything to say, or are you just going to keep whining
that we're not bashing your favorite target enough?


I'm just going to keep pointing out your lies and hypocrisy until you
start to re-evaluate some of your prejudices.

And by the looks of things, that could take quite some time.

T.


Interesting that you think you could instruct anyone about prejudices.

I think I've done a good job so far. Exposing the double standards
here has been a lot easier than I thought it would be, due to the
sheer number of fools coming forward and actually demonstrating the
double standards that I pointed out.

Jewish idiocy, especially the fundamentalist beliefs of the
ultra-Orthodox, are frequently mentioned here.

Well, I have to admit I got a laugh out of the talking fish that was
featured here recently.
But Jewish idiocy goes much further than that. Jewish Zionist idiocy
and arrogance could well plunge this whole planet into a third world
war.
And look at all the attacks on free speech at the moment, including
attacks on Internet free speech. Jews are behind just about all of
these attacks, and what's more, they're proud of it.

But rather than quote
some such idoit, or mention a recent religious-inspired unreasonable
event, you barge in complaining that we aren't bashing them enough.

When did I ever complain that y'all are not bashing jews enough?

Your whining isn't sufficient reason to bash anyone.

Again, When did I ever complain (or whine) that y'all are not bashing
jews enough?
Cmon, you made the accusation, show the evidence.


What, for example, is with the childish dollar sign in word "Jews"?

It got a reaction, didn't it?
Did you and all the other halfwits around here complain as bitterly
when people were attacking the $cientologists??
Well? Did you?
It's called hypocrisy, Kermy. And it stinks just as much when you do
it as when anyone else does. That's something you need to learn.

Racial epithets, deliberate conflating of ethnicity with religion,

So what ethnicity is a jew, Kermie?
Do you think you can tell who is a jew just by looking at the colour
of their skin?
Jews can be any colour from snow white to jet black, and they can be
native to any part of the planet. Not unlike christians in that
respect.
Perhaps you think all jews look like Alfred Hitchcock?

using that medieval cowardly and dishonest claim that they are
obssessed with money...

There aren't many trailer-park jews, Kermy.
The only trailer-park jew you're likely to see is the guy who collects
your rent, IOW, the owner of the trailer-park.

you give every sign of being a grade-A jerk.

Just a realist, Kermy. White man can't jump, you know, but lots of
black guys are good at basketball. And lots of Jews are good at
accumulating money. It's a fact.

Grow up, go away, and shut your yap. Not necessarily in that order.

You crack me up sometimes, Kermy. :)
T.
--
Jesus had himself killed because he needed the publicity.
.
User: "Kermit"

Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism 04 Nov 2003 05:28:30 PM
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote in message news:<acb7fa96.0311020431.60b4ed1b@posting.google.com>...

freehand_THX1138@hotmail.com (Kermit) wrote in message news:<1575bfdc.0311012306.27f29f5e@posting.google.com>...

(Thurston Phoremost) wrote in message news:<acb7fa96.0310311946.665fcade@posting.google.com>...

freehand_THX1138@hotmail.com (Kermit) wrote in message news:<1575bfdc.0310311541.18b8d987@posting.google.com>...

(Thurston Phoremost) wrote in message news:<acb7fa96.0310311201.48165f21@posting.google.com>...

FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism

- #1 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #2 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #3 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #4 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #5 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #6 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #7 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #8 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #9 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.
- #10 "Thou shalt not offend the jew$.



darkstar@shell1.iglou.com (Keenan Clay Wilkie) wrote in message news:<3fa20ef1_1@news.iglou.com>...

Barry OGrady <god_freee_jones@hotmail.com> writes:

On 28 Oct 2003 02:35:39 -0800,

(Thurston Phoremost) wrote:


I've noticed a double double standard standard here in alt.atheism.

It seems you can say anything you like about christians here. You can
abuse, ridicule, cuss - in fact, even the most vile bigoted
invective-laden stereotype , if aimed by atheists at christians, is
perfectly acceptable.

But as soon as you mention that Jew$ are often thought of as being a
bit greedy, well, suddenly you are persona non grata, and are plonked
by every hypocrite wanker in the newsgroup.

Can someone explain to me why it is OK to malign christians, but not
OK to say anything against Jew$?


Jews work very hard to suppress free speech about themselves so that they can
continue with their plans of world domination unhindered.
Anybody who supports the jews is putting themselves willingly into slavery.


Not content to bash Jews alone,


Would you prefer it if I only bashed xtians, just like you do?

Why? Is there a clause in the alt.atheism faq which forbids the
criticism of jew$?

Jew$ genuflect before the same idiotic butal god that the xtians do,
you know. Does this not mean that they are fair game too?

<idiotic accusations snipped>


You are being disingenuous if you claim that you are unaware of the
confusion between the Jewish religion and the Jewish people.


Well, I apologize for appearing to be unsympathetic about the fact
that you suffer from some confusion between the Jewish religion and
the Jewish people. How can I help? Why don't you relax here on this
couch and tell me all about it? When did you first start having these
feelings of confusion?

Also,
most of us wait until someone comes here and says something stupid in
a religious context (if it's not in a religious context, then hteir
being Jewish (in either sense)) is unlikely to come up.


Right, so if we feel disgusted about the genocide being comitted by
the fundamentalist jewish theocracy, Israel, and if we're disgusted
about the fact that the American taxpayer is financing it, we can
comment on it in a.a.

However, before doing so, we first to have wait for a self-identified
jewish poster in alt.atheism to say something stupid before we can
post any such criticism?

Gee. Something tells me that the genuine FAQ for this group would be a
real hoot.


Do you have anything to say, or are you just going to keep whining
that we're not bashing your favorite target enough?


I'm just going to keep pointing out your lies and hypocrisy until you
start to re-evaluate some of your prejudices.

And by the looks of things, that could take quite some time.

T.


Interesting that you think you could instruct anyone about prejudices.


I think I've done a good job so far. Exposing the double standards
here has been a lot easier than I thought it would be, due to the
sheer number of fools coming forward and actually demonstrating the
double standards that I pointed out.

Could you give an example of just one who castigated another religion
but failed to jump on a case of Jewish religious idiocy? And it would
take several such people, I think, to establish that this was typical
of this newsgroup.


Jewish idiocy, especially the fundamentalist beliefs of the
ultra-Orthodox, are frequently mentioned here.


Well, I have to admit I got a laugh out of the talking fish that was
featured here recently.

Good. So did I.


But Jewish idiocy goes much further than that. Jewish Zionist idiocy
and arrogance could well plunge this whole planet into a third world
war.

There are certainly Zionist fools who are doing more than their share
in this effort, but I'm frankly more worried about the Fundamentalists
in the White House than any other group (altho they can't do it alone.
Looks like the joint effort between the findie Muslim and Christian
lunatics, and the bit players the Orthodox Jewish idiots, may bring
the end about this time.


And look at all the attacks on free speech at the moment, including
attacks on Internet free speech. Jews are behind just about all of
these attacks, and what's more, they're proud of it.

Do you have any evidence? The shadowy, unproven conspiracy, run by a
minority of people who are both identifiable and disliked by several
powerful groups much larger than they?


But rather than quote
some such idoit, or mention a recent religious-inspired unreasonable
event, you barge in complaining that we aren't bashing them enough.


When did I ever complain that y'all are not bashing jews enough?

Um... I direct your attention up there ^^^
to the first post on this thread.


Your whining isn't sufficient reason to bash anyone.


Again, When did I ever complain (or whine) that y'all are not bashing
jews enough?

Ditto.


Cmon, you made the accusation, show the evidence.


What, for example, is with the childish dollar sign in word "Jews"?


It got a reaction, didn't it?

Yeah. It made me think that you were a racist halfwit.


Did you and all the other halfwits around here complain as bitterly
when people were attacking the $cientologists??

One: they aren't an ethnic group.
Two: every Scientologist has chosen their current lot in life.
We frequently will spontaneously start raggin' on Christians,
especially fundamentalists. But they dominate our culture, our laws.
We can't swing a dead cat without hitting some Pentecostal somewhere.
But you're not attacking religious stupidity; you are deliberately
conflating ethnic Jews with the religion, and the religion with
politics. Not to mention your paranoid conspiracy theories.


Well? Did you?

It's called hypocrisy, Kermy. And it stinks just as much when you do
it as when anyone else does. That's something you need to learn.

Sure does. Got evidence for any?


Racial epithets, deliberate conflating of ethnicity with religion,


So what ethnicity is a jew, Kermie?

Mostly culture, some trivial gentic average differences. Pretty much
the same as the ethnicity for any other group.


Do you think you can tell who is a jew just by looking at the colour
of their skin?

No. If simeone says he's Jewish and his mother speaks Yiddish, do you
assume that he's an Ultra-Orthodox Jew, and a rabid Zionist?


Jews can be any colour from snow white to jet black, and they can be
native to any part of the planet. Not unlike christians in that
respect.

Perhaps you think all jews look like Alfred Hitchcock?

using that medieval cowardly and dishonest claim that they are
obssessed with money...


There aren't many trailer-park jews, Kermy.

Not many trailer park ethnic Chinese, either. Does that mean there are
no poor Chinese Americans?


The only trailer-park jew you're likely to see is the guy who collects
your rent, IOW, the owner of the trailer-park.

you give every sign of being a grade-A jerk.


Don't get around much, do you? Or read history.

Just a realist, Kermy. White man can't jump, you know, but lots of
black guys are good at basketball. And lots of Jews are good at
accumulating money. It's a fact.

And lots aren't.

Grow up, go away, and shut your yap. Not necessarily in that order.


You crack me up sometimes, Kermy. :)

T.

--- Kermit
.




User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism 31 Oct 2003 08:31:37 PM
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:41:37 -0800, Kermit wrote:

Do you have anything to say, or are you just going to keep whining
that we're not bashing your favorite target enough?

That second part...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
"The computer revolution is over. We lost."
.
User: "Thurston Phoremost"

Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism 01 Nov 2003 02:33:54 PM
"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote in message news:<pan.2003.11.01.02.31.37.517197@eac.org>...

On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:41:37 -0800, Kermit wrote:

Do you have anything to say, or are you just going to keep whining
that we're not bashing your favorite target enough?


That second part...

Bilby, do you feel strong enough yet to make an attempt to "kick my
*****"?
Or are you still wishin' and hopin' that one of the other NAMBLA
jewpig pedofaggots here will make an attempt?
It's gonna be a long wait, Bilby. You might want to go down into your
damp dark burrow and hibernate, or whatever it is that you Bilbies do
while you're waiting for conditions to improve on the surface.
T.
.
User: "Kermit"

Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism 02 Nov 2003 12:56:04 AM
(Thurston Phoremost) wrote in message news:<acb7fa96.0311011233.18f6ea44@posting.google.com>...

"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote in message news:<pan.2003.11.01.02.31.37.517197@eac.org>...

On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:41:37 -0800, Kermit wrote:

Do you have anything to say, or are you just going to keep whining
that we're not bashing your favorite target enough?


That second part...


Bilby, do you feel strong enough yet to make an attempt to "kick my
*****"?

Or are you still wishin' and hopin' that one of the other NAMBLA
jewpig pedofaggots here will make an attempt?

It's gonna be a long wait, Bilby. You might want to go down into your
damp dark burrow and hibernate, or whatever it is that you Bilbies do
while you're waiting for conditions to improve on the surface.

T.

Ah. I am glad to see that I have not misjudged you.
Should we meet first, Thurston, I would be happy to shed light on this
ersatz machismo of yours: threatening personal violence over the
internet. We can discuss it in tactile Japanese, Chinese, Philipino,
or American West. Your choice.
--- Kermit
.
User: "Thurston Phoremost"

Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism 02 Nov 2003 06:43:43 AM
(Kermit) wrote in message news:<1575bfdc.0311012256.3cfe9319@posting.google.com>...

thurston_phoremost@hotmail.com (Thurston Phoremost) wrote in message news:<acb7fa96.0311011233.18f6ea44@posting.google.com>...

"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote in message news:<pan.2003.11.01.02.31.37.517197@eac.org>...

On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:41:37 -0800, Kermit wrote:

Do you have anything to say, or are you just going to keep whining
that we're not bashing your favorite target enough?


That second part...


Bilby, do you feel strong enough yet to make an attempt to "kick my
*****"?

Or are you still wishin' and hopin' that one of the other NAMBLA
jewpig pedofaggots here will make an attempt?

It's gonna be a long wait, Bilby. You might want to go down into your
damp dark burrow and hibernate, or whatever it is that you Bilbies do
while you're waiting for conditions to improve on the surface.

T.


Ah. I am glad to see that I have not misjudged you.

Should we meet first, Thurston, I would be happy to shed light on this
ersatz machismo of yours: threatening personal violence over the
internet. We can discuss it in tactile Japanese, Chinese, Philipino,
or American West. Your choice.

What are you ranting about here, Kermie?
T.
.

User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism 02 Nov 2003 09:03:01 AM
On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 22:56:04 -0800, Kermit wrote:

thurston_phoremost@hotmail.com (Thurston Phoremost) wrote in message news:<acb7fa96.0311011233.18f6ea44@posting.google.com>...

"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote in message news:<pan.2003.11.01.02.31.37.517197@eac.org>...

On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:41:37 -0800, Kermit wrote:

Do you have anything to say, or are you just going to keep whining
that we're not bashing your favorite target enough?


That second part...


Bilby, do you feel strong enough yet to make an attempt to "kick my
*****"?

Or are you still wishin' and hopin' that one of the other NAMBLA
jewpig pedofaggots here will make an attempt?

It's gonna be a long wait, Bilby. You might want to go down into your
damp dark burrow and hibernate, or whatever it is that you Bilbies do
while you're waiting for conditions to improve on the surface.

T.


Ah. I am glad to see that I have not misjudged you.

Should we meet first, Thurston, I would be happy to shed light on this
ersatz machismo of yours: threatening personal violence over the
internet. We can discuss it in tactile Japanese, Chinese, Philipino,
or American West. Your choice.

Meet? Not likely.
Notice the brave, studly "Thurston" having the courage of his convictions
and proudly using... a nym via Google so nobody knows who he is...
(Suddenly, I'm hearing a tune from Holy Grail...)
--
Mark K. Bilbo
"The computer revolution is over. We lost."
.
User: "Thurston Phoremost"

Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism 04 Nov 2003 04:35:06 AM
"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote in message news:<pan.2003.11.02.15.03.01.316192@eac.org>...

On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 22:56:04 -0800, Kermit wrote:

thurston_phoremost@hotmail.com (Thurston Phoremost) wrote in message news:<acb7fa96.0311011233.18f6ea44@posting.google.com>...

"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote in message news:<pan.2003.11.01.02.31.37.517197@eac.org>...

On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:41:37 -0800, Kermit wrote:

Do you have anything to say, or are you just going to keep whining
that we're not bashing your favorite target enough?


That second part...


Bilby, do you feel strong enough yet to make an attempt to "kick my
*****"?

Or are you still wishin' and hopin' that one of the other NAMBLA
jewpig pedofaggots here will make an attempt?

It's gonna be a long wait, Bilby. You might want to go down into your
damp dark burrow and hibernate, or whatever it is that you Bilbies do
while you're waiting for conditions to improve on the surface.

T.


Ah. I am glad to see that I have not misjudged you.

Should we meet first, Thurston, I would be happy to shed light on this
ersatz machismo of yours: threatening personal violence over the
internet. We can discuss it in tactile Japanese, Chinese, Philipino,
or American West. Your choice.


Meet? Not likely.

Notice the brave, studly "Thurston" having the courage of his convictions
and proudly using... a nym via Google so nobody knows who he is...

Unlike Brave Sir Kermit, who uses his real name.
Except...
I hate to be the one to say this, but all green frogs look the same to
me.
(Seriously though, isn't it a bit pathetic when people start
threatening violence when they come off second best in a Usenet flame
war?)
T.


(Suddenly, I'm hearing a tune from Holy Grail...)

.
User: "William Klee"

Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism 04 Nov 2003 01:58:59 PM
In article <acb7fa96.0311040235.727f016b@posting.google.com>, Thurston
Phoremost <thurston_phoremost@hotmail.com> wrote:

"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote in message
news:<pan.2003.11.02.15.03.01.316192@eac.org>...

On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 22:56:04 -0800, Kermit wrote:

thurston_phoremost@hotmail.com (Thurston Phoremost) wrote in message
news:<acb7fa96.0311011233.18f6ea44@posting.google.com>...

"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote in message
news:<pan.2003.11.01.02.31.37.517197@eac.org>...

On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:41:37 -0800, Kermit wrote:

Do you have anything to say, or are you just going to keep whining
that we're not bashing your favorite target enough?


That second part...


Bilby, do you feel strong enough yet to make an attempt to "kick my
*****"?

Or are you still wishin' and hopin' that one of the other NAMBLA
jewpig pedofaggots here will make an attempt?

It's gonna be a long wait, Bilby. You might want to go down into your
damp dark burrow and hibernate, or whatever it is that you Bilbies do
while you're waiting for conditions to improve on the surface.

T.


Ah. I am glad to see that I have not misjudged you.

Should we meet first, Thurston, I would be happy to shed light on this
ersatz machismo of yours: threatening personal violence over the
internet. We can discuss it in tactile Japanese, Chinese, Philipino,
or American West. Your choice.


Meet? Not likely.

Notice the brave, studly "Thurston" having the courage of his convictions
and proudly using... a nym via Google so nobody knows who he is...


Unlike Brave Sir Kermit, who uses his real name.

Except...

I hate to be the one to say this, but all green frogs look the same to
me.

(Seriously though, isn't it a bit pathetic when people start
threatening violence when they come off second best in a Usenet flame
war?)

I must have missed the post where you threatened violence. What a
surprise.
.
User: "Thurston Phoremost"

Title: Re: FAQ - The 10 commandments of alt.atheism 04 Nov 2003 09:04:42 PM
William Klee <fnord2k@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<041120031358595602%fnord2k@yahoo.com>...

In article <acb7fa96.0311040235.727f016b@posting.google.com