me first, ***** you



 Religions > Atheism > me first, ***** you

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 4

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "United we Stand"
Date: 20 Feb 2005 03:31:53 PM
Object: me first, ***** you
"Me first, ***** you" a.k.a. MFFY - that is how atheists drive, because they
don't care about anyone but themselves. The way I see it, this is America,
One Country Under God (TM). Atheists should not be allowed to get driver's
licenses here, or even allowed on the road as bikers. We should at least
include questions about Jesus on the written part of the driver's license
tests, to weed them out.
.

User: "Paul"

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 22 Feb 2005 05:58:23 AM
"United we Stand" <send@me.some.spam> wrote in message
news:1212688.LShhszTYyy@yahoo.com...

"Me first, ***** you" a.k.a. MFFY - that is how atheists drive, because

they
<snip>

tests, to weed them out.

Troll - O - Meter: 0.6
.

User: "di"

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 20 Feb 2005 03:55:08 PM
"United we Stand" <send@me.some.spam> wrote in message
news:1212688.LShhszTYyy@yahoo.com...

"Me first, ***** you" a.k.a. MFFY - that is how atheists drive, because

they

don't care about anyone but themselves. The way I see it, this is America,
One Country Under God (TM). Atheists should not be allowed to get driver's
licenses here, or even allowed on the road as bikers. We should at least
include questions about Jesus on the written part of the driver's license
tests, to weed them out.

Does anyone know why all these losers are migrating to this list?
.
User: "There She Was Just A-Clayton Down The Street..."

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 20 Feb 2005 06:08:18 PM
"di" <di0000@cox.net> wrote in message
news:_G7Sd.27606$Cs.3039@okepread02...


"United we Stand" <send@me.some.spam> wrote in message
news:1212688.LShhszTYyy@yahoo.com...

"Me first, ***** you" a.k.a. MFFY - that is how atheists drive, because

they

don't care about anyone but themselves. The way I see it, this is

America,

One Country Under God (TM). Atheists should not be allowed to get

driver's

licenses here, or even allowed on the road as bikers. We should at least
include questions about Jesus on the written part of the driver's

license

tests, to weed them out.


Does anyone know why all these losers are migrating to this list?

It's the same loser over and over again. He changes name...throws out some
flame bait...gets dozens of abusive responses...has an orgasm over the
attention he gets...then changes his name and repeats. Responding just
encourages him!
.

User: "Christopher A. Lee"

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 20 Feb 2005 03:59:46 PM
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 15:55:08 -0600, "di" <di0000@cox.net> wrote:


"United we Stand" <send@me.some.spam> wrote in message
news:1212688.LShhszTYyy@yahoo.com...

"Me first, ***** you" a.k.a. MFFY - that is how atheists drive, because

they

don't care about anyone but themselves. The way I see it, this is America,
One Country Under God (TM). Atheists should not be allowed to get driver's
licenses here, or even allowed on the road as bikers. We should at least
include questions about Jesus on the written part of the driver's license
tests, to weed them out.


Does anyone know why all these losers are migrating to this list?

Look at the headers. It's crossposted to:
rec.bicycles.misc,
rec.autos.driving,
alt.religion.christian,
rec.bicycles.soc,
alt.atheism
.
User: "Zoot Katz"

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 20 Feb 2005 04:34:55 PM
Sun, 20 Feb 2005 16:59:46 -0500,
<t02i119krh50dna3nc414njuadnnpkvc9m@4ax.com>, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote, presumably from <alt.atheism>:

On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 15:55:08 -0600, "di" <di0000@cox.net> wrote:


"United we Stand" <send@me.some.spam> wrote in message
news:1212688.LShhszTYyy@yahoo.com...

"Me first, ***** you" a.k.a. MFFY - that is how atheists drive, because

they

don't care about anyone but themselves. The way I see it, this is America,
One Country Under God (TM). Atheists should not be allowed to get driver's
licenses here, or even allowed on the road as bikers. We should at least
include questions about Jesus on the written part of the driver's license
tests, to weed them out.


Does anyone know why all these losers are migrating to this list?


Look at the headers. It's crossposted to:
rec.bicycles.misc,
rec.autos.driving,
alt.religion.christian,
rec.bicycles.soc,
alt.atheism

And both of you geniuses, either deliberately or through ignorance,
propagated it to all those groups.
Trim the x-post if you feel compelled to reply. Reply to their group
and leave out this one. Set your follow-up to <alt.dev.null> or
somewhere. Reply in this group and leave out the others.
Pay attention to where you're spewing your stupidity.
Don't feed the trolls.
--
zk
.


User: "John Baker"

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 20 Feb 2005 04:50:16 PM
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 15:55:08 -0600, "di" <di0000@cox.net> wrote:


"United we Stand" <send@me.some.spam> wrote in message
news:1212688.LShhszTYyy@yahoo.com...

"Me first, ***** you" a.k.a. MFFY - that is how atheists drive, because

they

don't care about anyone but themselves. The way I see it, this is America,
One Country Under God (TM). Atheists should not be allowed to get driver's
licenses here, or even allowed on the road as bikers. We should at least
include questions about Jesus on the written part of the driver's license
tests, to weed them out.


Does anyone know why all these losers are migrating to this list?

Nope. It's too early for Spring Break....


.


User: "Michelle Malkin"

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 20 Feb 2005 04:16:11 PM
"United we Stand" <send@me.some.spam> wrote in message
news:1212688.LShhszTYyy@yahoo.com...

"Me first, ***** you" a.k.a. MFFY - that is how atheists drive, because

they

don't care about anyone but themselves. The way I see it, this is America,
One Country Under God (TM). Atheists should not be allowed to get driver's
licenses here, or even allowed on the road as bikers. We should at least
include questions about Jesus on the written part of the driver's license
tests, to weed them out.

Why do you hate yourself so much? Did your religion do this to
you? It's made you less than human.
.
User: "Daniel J. Stern"

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 20 Feb 2005 04:25:16 PM
+----------+
| PLEASE |
| DO NOT |
| FEED THE |
| TROLLS |
+----------+
| |
| |
.\|.||/..
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Michelle Malkin wrote:


"United we Stand" <send@me.some.spam> wrote in message
news:1212688.LShhszTYyy@yahoo.com...

"Me first, ***** you" a.k.a. MFFY - that is how atheists drive, because

they

don't care about anyone but themselves. The way I see it, this is America,
One Country Under God (TM). Atheists should not be allowed to get driver's
licenses here, or even allowed on the road as bikers. We should at least
include questions about Jesus on the written part of the driver's license
tests, to weed them out.


Why do you hate yourself so much? Did your religion do this to
you? It's made you less than human.




.


User: "There She Was Just A-Clayton Down The Street..."

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 20 Feb 2005 06:06:25 PM
"United we Stand" <send@me.some.spam> wrote in message
news:1212688.LShhszTYyy@yahoo.com...
Please don't feed the attention seeking, hit and run troll! All he wants is
as many responses as possible....he doesn't care what you write!
.

User: "wafflycat wafflesATv21netDOTcoDOTuk"

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 21 Feb 2005 03:50:31 AM
"United we Stand" <send@me.some.spam> wrote in message
news:1212688.LShhszTYyy@yahoo.com...

"Me first, ***** you" a.k.a. MFFY - that is how atheists drive, because
they
don't care about anyone but themselves. The way I see it, this is America,
One Country Under God (TM). Atheists should not be allowed to get driver's
licenses here, or even allowed on the road as bikers. We should at least
include questions about Jesus on the written part of the driver's license
tests, to weed them out.

sniff... sniff..
ah yes, the completely obvious fetid odour of liquid bovine bowel movements
Cheers, helen s
.
User: ""

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 22 Feb 2005 07:11:44 PM
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 09:50:31 -0000, "wafflycat"
<wafflesATv21netDOTcoDOTuk> wrote:


"United we Stand" <send@me.some.spam> wrote in message
news:1212688.LShhszTYyy@yahoo.com...

"Me first, ***** you" a.k.a. MFFY - that is how atheists drive, because
they
don't care about anyone but themselves. The way I see it, this is America,
One Country Under God (TM). Atheists should not be allowed to get driver's
licenses here, or even allowed on the road as bikers. We should at least
include questions about Jesus on the written part of the driver's license
tests, to weed them out.


Catch leprosy.

sniff... sniff..

ah yes, the completely obvious fetid odour of liquid bovine bowel movements

Cheers, helen s

drift
.


User: "Don Kresch"

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 20 Feb 2005 05:33:22 PM
In alt.atheism on Sun, 20 Feb 2005 13:31:53 -0800, United we Stand
<send@me.some.spam> let us all know that:
troll
Don
---
aa #51, Knight of BAAWA, DNRC o-, Member of the [H]orde
Atheist Minister for St. Dogbert.
"No being is so important that he can usurp the rights of another"
Picard to Data/Graves "The Schizoid Man"
.

User: "johac"

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 21 Feb 2005 12:22:39 AM
In article <1212688.LShhszTYyy@yahoo.com>,
United we Stand <send@me.some.spam> wrote:

"Me first, ***** you" a.k.a. MFFY - that is how atheists drive, because they
don't care about anyone but themselves. The way I see it, this is America,
One Country Under God (TM). Atheists should not be allowed to get driver's
licenses here, or even allowed on the road as bikers. We should at least
include questions about Jesus on the written part of the driver's license
tests, to weed them out.

I can't even begin to remember all of the times that I was cut off by
some fool with an xtian fish on his bumper.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
Intelligent Design has as much to do with science as reality
television has to do with reality. - Barry Lynn on CNN 12/25/04
.
User: "Scott en Aztlán"

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 21 Feb 2005 08:53:13 AM
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:22:39 -0800, johac <jhachm@ixpres.com> wrote:

I can't even begin to remember all of the times that I was cut off by
some fool with an xtian fish on his bumper.

LOL!!! I am forced to concur with that observation. For a while I
thought Pisces was the sign for aggressive drivers, but then someone
explained to me that those fish decals have nothing to do with
Astrology...
--
Sloth Kills!
http://www.geocities.com/slothkills/
.
User: "The other Donald"

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 21 Feb 2005 09:27:46 AM
"Scott en Aztlán" <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:lbtj119qgp9ncu218toqma283ale03gv82@4ax.com...

On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:22:39 -0800, johac <jhachm@ixpres.com> wrote:

I can't even begin to remember all of the times that I was cut off by
some fool with an xtian fish on his bumper.


LOL!!! I am forced to concur with that observation. For a while I
thought Pisces was the sign for aggressive drivers, but then someone
explained to me that those fish decals have nothing to do with
Astrology...

Actually, that "fish" is the pagan symbol for a vagina:
http://www.geocities.com/llfptfu/sf.html
Christians merely adopted the sign in their zeal to usurp Paganism in
general, but the modern itterations of the religious sheep didn't do their
homework when coming up with ways to display their egos on their cars.
--
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
.....and ordained minister
Stork pin recipient: May 1, 2003 -Madelyn
.

User: "johac"

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 22 Feb 2005 01:19:38 AM
In article <lbtj119qgp9ncu218toqma283ale03gv82@4ax.com>,
Scott en Aztl?n <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote:

On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:22:39 -0800, johac <jhachm@ixpres.com> wrote:

I can't even begin to remember all of the times that I was cut off by
some fool with an xtian fish on his bumper.


LOL!!! I am forced to concur with that observation. For a while I
thought Pisces was the sign for aggressive drivers, but then someone
explained to me that those fish decals have nothing to do with
Astrology...

LOL! That's a good one!
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
Intelligent Design has as much to do with science as reality
television has to do with reality. - Barry Lynn on CNN 12/25/04
.


User: "Bill Z."

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 21 Feb 2005 01:06:51 AM
johac <jhachm@ixpres.com> writes:

In article <1212688.LShhszTYyy@yahoo.com>,
United we Stand <send@me.some.spam> wrote:

MFFY - that is how atheists drive, because they don't care about
anyone but themselves. The way I see it, this is America, One
Country Under God (TM). Atheists should not be allowed to get
driver's licenses here, or even allowed on the road as bikers. We
should at least include questions about Jesus on the written part
of the driver's license tests, to weed them out.


I can't even begin to remember all of the times that I was cut off by
some fool with an xtian fish on his bumper.

Oh, it's worse than that. Before they moved us to another building,
my commute to work was along Middlefield Road in Menlo Park, CA.
About 200 meters into Menlo Park, heading north (just past Willow
rd.), I'd go past an office building that apparently had a Planned
Parenthood clinic in it. Naturally, the "Christian" anti-abortion
nuts were out in force picketing, complete with horror-movie signs.
At one point, while riding a bicycle into work, I stopped and asked
one of them if they wouldn't mind moving the sign to the opposite side
of a narrow cross street because the sign's position would block my
view of vehicles on the cross street to the point where I couldn't
make eye contact with a driver, and explained the safety issue in some
detail - if a driver doesn't see you and moves out across the bike
lane into your path, your choices are an accident with him or a sudden
swerve that will risk an accident with an overtaking vehicle, and
while you can mitigate the risk by slowing substantially, you can't
completely eliminate it.
Instead of showing any concern for anyone's safety, this guy told me
that I shouldn't be riding on that road (which had few intersections,
a 35 mph speed limit, and full-sized traffic lanes with adjacent bike
lanes) adding that the road was "very dangerous." I don't aways
suffer fools gladly, so I told him that the most dangerous thing on
this road was his f___ing sign.
He replied, "Did you use the 'F' word?" And ordered me to leave the
area (I was on a public street.) That's what mattered to him, not the
safety hazard he was creating. The next day, I went to a climbing gym
over lunch, and told some people working there this story. *Everyone*
was practically rolling on the floor laughing, with one rolling his
eyes and joking about "virgin ears."
Last I heard, the "Christian" I had a disagreement with ended up in
the hoosegow for some illegal activity. I just saw a line-item in a
newspaper (with a a picture that resembled the dude), but I really
don't remember the details.
I did cause them some trouble though. The guy's attitude - a complete
lack of concern about my safety plus ordering me to leave a public
area where I had as much right to be at as he did - pissed me off, so
I sent a written complaint to the city, which was fowarded to the city
attorney, who no doubt had received a lot of complaints about these
nuts (they had also picketed the home of someone on the city council,
displaying their gory signs in a residential area where there were
lots of small children.) The attorney immediately picked up on the
obvious - that I had complained about a safety hazard that was
independent of the content of the sign, and that this complaint was
thus useful for getting rid of this group, since the content-free
nature of the complaint prevented a counter argument based on the
First Amendment).
All they would have had to do to avoid this reaction on part was to
say that they hadn't realized the safety issue and would simply move
the sign 20 feet to where it wouldn't block one's view of a vehicle
stopped at the intersection's stop sign. They were too arrogant to
even do that, even though my first request was very polite. All I
wanted to do, after all, was to ride a bike into work without some
people adding unnecessary risks to my commute.
.
User: "United we Stand"

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 21 Feb 2005 01:18:06 AM
Bill Z. wrote:

johac <jhachm@ixpres.com> writes:

In article <1212688.LShhszTYyy@yahoo.com>,
United we Stand <send@me.some.spam> wrote:

MFFY - that is how atheists drive, because they don't care about
anyone but themselves. The way I see it, this is America, One
Country Under God (TM). Atheists should not be allowed to get
driver's licenses here, or even allowed on the road as bikers. We
should at least include questions about Jesus on the written part
of the driver's license tests, to weed them out.


I can't even begin to remember all of the times that I was cut off by
some fool with an xtian fish on his bumper.


Oh, it's worse than that. Before they moved us to another building,
my commute to work was along Middlefield Road in Menlo Park, CA.
About 200 meters into Menlo Park, heading north (just past Willow
rd.), I'd go past an office building that apparently had a Planned
Parenthood clinic in it. Naturally, the "Christian" anti-abortion
nuts were out in force picketing, complete with horror-movie signs.

At one point, while riding a bicycle into work, I stopped and asked
one of them if they wouldn't mind moving the sign to the opposite side
of a narrow cross street because the sign's position would block my
view of vehicles on the cross street to the point where I couldn't
make eye contact with a driver, and explained the safety issue in some
detail - if a driver doesn't see you and moves out across the bike
lane into your path, your choices are an accident with him or a sudden
swerve that will risk an accident with an overtaking vehicle, and
while you can mitigate the risk by slowing substantially, you can't
completely eliminate it.

Instead of showing any concern for anyone's safety, this guy told me
that I shouldn't be riding on that road (which had few intersections,
a 35 mph speed limit, and full-sized traffic lanes with adjacent bike
lanes) adding that the road was "very dangerous." I don't aways
suffer fools gladly, so I told him that the most dangerous thing on
this road was his f___ing sign.

He replied, "Did you use the 'F' word?" And ordered me to leave the
area (I was on a public street.) That's what mattered to him, not the
safety hazard he was creating. The next day, I went to a climbing gym
over lunch, and told some people working there this story. *Everyone*
was practically rolling on the floor laughing, with one rolling his
eyes and joking about "virgin ears."

Last I heard, the "Christian" I had a disagreement with ended up in
the hoosegow for some illegal activity. I just saw a line-item in a
newspaper (with a a picture that resembled the dude), but I really
don't remember the details.

I did cause them some trouble though. The guy's attitude - a complete
lack of concern about my safety plus ordering me to leave a public
area where I had as much right to be at as he did - pissed me off, so
I sent a written complaint to the city, which was fowarded to the city
attorney, who no doubt had received a lot of complaints about these
nuts (they had also picketed the home of someone on the city council,
displaying their gory signs in a residential area where there were
lots of small children.) The attorney immediately picked up on the
obvious - that I had complained about a safety hazard that was
independent of the content of the sign, and that this complaint was
thus useful for getting rid of this group, since the content-free
nature of the complaint prevented a counter argument based on the
First Amendment).

All they would have had to do to avoid this reaction on part was to
say that they hadn't realized the safety issue and would simply move
the sign 20 feet to where it wouldn't block one's view of a vehicle
stopped at the intersection's stop sign. They were too arrogant to
even do that, even though my first request was very polite. All I
wanted to do, after all, was to ride a bike into work without some
people adding unnecessary risks to my commute.

Irrelevant. The Bible says nothing about abortions.
.
User: "The other Donald"

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 21 Feb 2005 01:26:23 AM
"United we Stand" <send@me.some.spam> wrote in message
news:3514874.bbhKNLClx5@yahoo.com...

Bill Z. wrote:

johac <jhachm@ixpres.com> writes:

In article <1212688.LShhszTYyy@yahoo.com>,
United we Stand <send@me.some.spam> wrote:

MFFY - that is how atheists drive, because they don't care about
anyone but themselves. The way I see it, this is America, One
Country Under God (TM). Atheists should not be allowed to get
driver's licenses here, or even allowed on the road as bikers. We
should at least include questions about Jesus on the written part
of the driver's license tests, to weed them out.


I can't even begin to remember all of the times that I was cut off by
some fool with an xtian fish on his bumper.


Oh, it's worse than that. Before they moved us to another building,
my commute to work was along Middlefield Road in Menlo Park, CA.
About 200 meters into Menlo Park, heading north (just past Willow
rd.), I'd go past an office building that apparently had a Planned
Parenthood clinic in it. Naturally, the "Christian" anti-abortion
nuts were out in force picketing, complete with horror-movie signs.

At one point, while riding a bicycle into work, I stopped and asked
one of them if they wouldn't mind moving the sign to the opposite side
of a narrow cross street because the sign's position would block my
view of vehicles on the cross street to the point where I couldn't
make eye contact with a driver, and explained the safety issue in some
detail - if a driver doesn't see you and moves out across the bike
lane into your path, your choices are an accident with him or a sudden
swerve that will risk an accident with an overtaking vehicle, and
while you can mitigate the risk by slowing substantially, you can't
completely eliminate it.

Instead of showing any concern for anyone's safety, this guy told me
that I shouldn't be riding on that road (which had few intersections,
a 35 mph speed limit, and full-sized traffic lanes with adjacent bike
lanes) adding that the road was "very dangerous." I don't aways
suffer fools gladly, so I told him that the most dangerous thing on
this road was his f___ing sign.

He replied, "Did you use the 'F' word?" And ordered me to leave the
area (I was on a public street.) That's what mattered to him, not the
safety hazard he was creating. The next day, I went to a climbing gym
over lunch, and told some people working there this story. *Everyone*
was practically rolling on the floor laughing, with one rolling his
eyes and joking about "virgin ears."

Last I heard, the "Christian" I had a disagreement with ended up in
the hoosegow for some illegal activity. I just saw a line-item in a
newspaper (with a a picture that resembled the dude), but I really
don't remember the details.

I did cause them some trouble though. The guy's attitude - a complete
lack of concern about my safety plus ordering me to leave a public
area where I had as much right to be at as he did - pissed me off, so
I sent a written complaint to the city, which was fowarded to the city
attorney, who no doubt had received a lot of complaints about these
nuts (they had also picketed the home of someone on the city council,
displaying their gory signs in a residential area where there were
lots of small children.) The attorney immediately picked up on the
obvious - that I had complained about a safety hazard that was
independent of the content of the sign, and that this complaint was
thus useful for getting rid of this group, since the content-free
nature of the complaint prevented a counter argument based on the
First Amendment).

All they would have had to do to avoid this reaction on part was to
say that they hadn't realized the safety issue and would simply move
the sign 20 feet to where it wouldn't block one's view of a vehicle
stopped at the intersection's stop sign. They were too arrogant to
even do that, even though my first request was very polite. All I
wanted to do, after all, was to ride a bike into work without some
people adding unnecessary risks to my commute.


Irrelevant. The Bible says nothing about abortions.

Au contraire, you stupid *****....
God(tm) the Divine Abortion Provider:
Hosea 13:16 ~Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against
her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in
pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.
Hosea 9:16 ~Ephraim is smitten, their root is dried up, they shall bear no
fruit: yea, though they bring forth, yet will I slay even the beloved fruit
of their womb.
In typical fashion, a christian that doesn't know a damn thing about the
Bible.
--
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
.....and ordained minister
Stork Pin recipient: May 1, 2003 -Madelyn
(tm) 2005 G.O.P. All names used without permission from the copyright
holder. ***** 'em.
.
User: "United we Stand"

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 21 Feb 2005 01:37:30 AM
The other Donald wrote:


"United we Stand" <send@me.some.spam> wrote in message
news:3514874.bbhKNLClx5@yahoo.com...

Bill Z. wrote:

johac <jhachm@ixpres.com> writes:

In article <1212688.LShhszTYyy@yahoo.com>,
United we Stand <send@me.some.spam> wrote:

MFFY - that is how atheists drive, because they don't care about
anyone but themselves. The way I see it, this is America, One
Country Under God (TM). Atheists should not be allowed to get
driver's licenses here, or even allowed on the road as bikers. We
should at least include questions about Jesus on the written part
of the driver's license tests, to weed them out.


I can't even begin to remember all of the times that I was cut off by
some fool with an xtian fish on his bumper.


Oh, it's worse than that. Before they moved us to another building,
my commute to work was along Middlefield Road in Menlo Park, CA.
About 200 meters into Menlo Park, heading north (just past Willow
rd.), I'd go past an office building that apparently had a Planned
Parenthood clinic in it. Naturally, the "Christian" anti-abortion
nuts were out in force picketing, complete with horror-movie signs.

At one point, while riding a bicycle into work, I stopped and asked
one of them if they wouldn't mind moving the sign to the opposite side
of a narrow cross street because the sign's position would block my
view of vehicles on the cross street to the point where I couldn't
make eye contact with a driver, and explained the safety issue in some
detail - if a driver doesn't see you and moves out across the bike
lane into your path, your choices are an accident with him or a sudden
swerve that will risk an accident with an overtaking vehicle, and
while you can mitigate the risk by slowing substantially, you can't
completely eliminate it.

Instead of showing any concern for anyone's safety, this guy told me
that I shouldn't be riding on that road (which had few intersections,
a 35 mph speed limit, and full-sized traffic lanes with adjacent bike
lanes) adding that the road was "very dangerous." I don't aways
suffer fools gladly, so I told him that the most dangerous thing on
this road was his f___ing sign.

He replied, "Did you use the 'F' word?" And ordered me to leave the
area (I was on a public street.) That's what mattered to him, not the
safety hazard he was creating. The next day, I went to a climbing gym
over lunch, and told some people working there this story. *Everyone*
was practically rolling on the floor laughing, with one rolling his
eyes and joking about "virgin ears."

Last I heard, the "Christian" I had a disagreement with ended up in
the hoosegow for some illegal activity. I just saw a line-item in a
newspaper (with a a picture that resembled the dude), but I really
don't remember the details.

I did cause them some trouble though. The guy's attitude - a complete
lack of concern about my safety plus ordering me to leave a public
area where I had as much right to be at as he did - pissed me off, so
I sent a written complaint to the city, which was fowarded to the city
attorney, who no doubt had received a lot of complaints about these
nuts (they had also picketed the home of someone on the city council,
displaying their gory signs in a residential area where there were
lots of small children.) The attorney immediately picked up on the
obvious - that I had complained about a safety hazard that was
independent of the content of the sign, and that this complaint was
thus useful for getting rid of this group, since the content-free
nature of the complaint prevented a counter argument based on the
First Amendment).

All they would have had to do to avoid this reaction on part was to
say that they hadn't realized the safety issue and would simply move
the sign 20 feet to where it wouldn't block one's view of a vehicle
stopped at the intersection's stop sign. They were too arrogant to
even do that, even though my first request was very polite. All I
wanted to do, after all, was to ride a bike into work without some
people adding unnecessary risks to my commute.


Irrelevant. The Bible says nothing about abortions.


Au contraire, you stupid *****....

God(tm) the Divine Abortion Provider:
Hosea 13:16 ~Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against
her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in
pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.

Hosea 9:16 ~Ephraim is smitten, their root is dried up, they shall bear no
fruit: yea, though they bring forth, yet will I slay even the beloved
fruit of their womb.

In typical fashion, a christian that doesn't know a damn thing about the
Bible.

You are quoting the Jewish Bible, you moron. The Christian God is OK with
abortions, AFAIK.
.
User: "The other Donald"

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 21 Feb 2005 01:45:56 AM
"United we Stand" <send@me.some.spam> wrote in message
news:1340034.t1RoDEl5LV@yahoo.com...

The other Donald wrote:


"United we Stand" <send@me.some.spam> wrote in message
news:3514874.bbhKNLClx5@yahoo.com...

Bill Z. wrote:

johac <jhachm@ixpres.com> writes:

In article <1212688.LShhszTYyy@yahoo.com>,
United we Stand <send@me.some.spam> wrote:

MFFY - that is how atheists drive, because they don't care about
anyone but themselves. The way I see it, this is America, One
Country Under God (TM). Atheists should not be allowed to get
driver's licenses here, or even allowed on the road as bikers. We
should at least include questions about Jesus on the written part
of the driver's license tests, to weed them out.


I can't even begin to remember all of the times that I was cut off

by

some fool with an xtian fish on his bumper.


Oh, it's worse than that. Before they moved us to another building,
my commute to work was along Middlefield Road in Menlo Park, CA.
About 200 meters into Menlo Park, heading north (just past Willow
rd.), I'd go past an office building that apparently had a Planned
Parenthood clinic in it. Naturally, the "Christian" anti-abortion
nuts were out in force picketing, complete with horror-movie signs.

At one point, while riding a bicycle into work, I stopped and asked
one of them if they wouldn't mind moving the sign to the opposite

side

of a narrow cross street because the sign's position would block my
view of vehicles on the cross street to the point where I couldn't
make eye contact with a driver, and explained the safety issue in

some

detail - if a driver doesn't see you and moves out across the bike
lane into your path, your choices are an accident with him or a

sudden

swerve that will risk an accident with an overtaking vehicle, and
while you can mitigate the risk by slowing substantially, you can't
completely eliminate it.

Instead of showing any concern for anyone's safety, this guy told me
that I shouldn't be riding on that road (which had few intersections,
a 35 mph speed limit, and full-sized traffic lanes with adjacent bike
lanes) adding that the road was "very dangerous." I don't aways
suffer fools gladly, so I told him that the most dangerous thing on
this road was his f___ing sign.

He replied, "Did you use the 'F' word?" And ordered me to leave the
area (I was on a public street.) That's what mattered to him, not

the

safety hazard he was creating. The next day, I went to a climbing

gym

over lunch, and told some people working there this story. *Everyone*
was practically rolling on the floor laughing, with one rolling his
eyes and joking about "virgin ears."

Last I heard, the "Christian" I had a disagreement with ended up in
the hoosegow for some illegal activity. I just saw a line-item in a
newspaper (with a a picture that resembled the dude), but I really
don't remember the details.

I did cause them some trouble though. The guy's attitude - a complete
lack of concern about my safety plus ordering me to leave a public
area where I had as much right to be at as he did - pissed me off, so
I sent a written complaint to the city, which was fowarded to the

city

attorney, who no doubt had received a lot of complaints about these
nuts (they had also picketed the home of someone on the city council,
displaying their gory signs in a residential area where there were
lots of small children.) The attorney immediately picked up on the
obvious - that I had complained about a safety hazard that was
independent of the content of the sign, and that this complaint was
thus useful for getting rid of this group, since the content-free
nature of the complaint prevented a counter argument based on the
First Amendment).

All they would have had to do to avoid this reaction on part was to
say that they hadn't realized the safety issue and would simply move
the sign 20 feet to where it wouldn't block one's view of a vehicle
stopped at the intersection's stop sign. They were too arrogant to
even do that, even though my first request was very polite. All I
wanted to do, after all, was to ride a bike into work without some
people adding unnecessary risks to my commute.


Irrelevant. The Bible says nothing about abortions.


Au contraire, you stupid *****....

God(tm) the Divine Abortion Provider:
Hosea 13:16 ~Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled

against

her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in
pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.

Hosea 9:16 ~Ephraim is smitten, their root is dried up, they shall bear

no

fruit: yea, though they bring forth, yet will I slay even the beloved
fruit of their womb.

In typical fashion, a christian that doesn't know a damn thing about the
Bible.


You are quoting the Jewish Bible, you moron.

That's right....you're a Jew-Lite -twice the arrogance, but only half the
intelligence.

The Christian God is OK with
abortions, AFAIK.

Holy *****, this get's better by the minute....You certainly are a stupid
sonofabitch. In fact, you are so fucking stupid that you don't even realize
just how stupid your remarks truly are.
--
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
.....and ordained minister
Stork pin recipient: May 1, 2003 -Madelyn
.
User: "John Baker"

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 21 Feb 2005 11:27:46 AM
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 07:45:56 GMT, "The other Donald"
<the_donald_13@yeehaw3.com> wrote:
<snipped for brevity>


Holy *****, this get's better by the minute....You certainly are a stupid
sonofabitch. In fact, you are so fucking stupid that you don't even realize
just how stupid your remarks truly are.

I've always been of the opinion that guys like UWS should be allowed,
even encouraged, to rant to their little hearts' content. As I've
often said, one believer like this, given free rein, can do more to
expose the arrogance, hypocrisy and utter worthlessness of
Christianity than 100 atheists could ever hope to.
.
User: "S o r n i"

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 21 Feb 2005 11:42:56 AM
John Baker wrote:

I've always been of the opinion that guys like UWS should be allowed,
even encouraged, to rant to their little hearts' content. As I've
often said, one believer like this, given free rein, can do more to
expose the arrogance, hypocrisy and utter worthlessness of
Christianity than 100 atheists could ever hope to.

Yeah, because obviously he's representative of the "average" Christian.
Idiots come in all denominations, including none at all.
Thanks for demonstrating it.
.
User: "John Baker"

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 21 Feb 2005 12:02:05 PM
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:42:56 GMT, "S o r n i"
<sorni@bite-me.san.rr.com> wrote:

John Baker wrote:

I've always been of the opinion that guys like UWS should be allowed,
even encouraged, to rant to their little hearts' content. As I've
often said, one believer like this, given free rein, can do more to
expose the arrogance, hypocrisy and utter worthlessness of
Christianity than 100 atheists could ever hope to.


Yeah, because obviously he's representative of the "average" Christian.

Idiots come in all denominations, including none at all.

Thanks for demonstrating it.

And thank *you* for demonstrating it. Perhaps you should have asked me
what my point was before resorting to insults. I rest my case.


.
User: "S o r n i"

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 21 Feb 2005 12:19:47 PM
John Baker wrote:

On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:42:56 GMT, "S o r n i"
<sorni@bite-me.san.rr.com> wrote:

John Baker wrote:

I've always been of the opinion that guys like UWS should be
allowed, even encouraged, to rant to their little hearts' content.
As I've often said, one believer like this, given free rein, can do
more to expose the arrogance, hypocrisy and utter worthlessness of
Christianity than 100 atheists could ever hope to.


Yeah, because obviously he's representative of the "average"
Christian.

Idiots come in all denominations, including none at all.

Thanks for demonstrating it.


And thank *you* for demonstrating it. Perhaps you should have asked me
what my point was before resorting to insults. I rest my case.

You mean I should have read your paragraph, grasped its painfully plain
meaning, and then asked you what your point was (even though you'd just
stated it)???
A real head-scratcher, that.
.
User: "The other Donald"

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 23 Feb 2005 12:37:33 PM
"S o r n i" <sorni@bite-me.san.rr.com> wrote in message
news:7DpSd.7652$VD5.3201@twister.socal.rr.com...

John Baker wrote:

On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:42:56 GMT, "S o r n i"
<sorni@bite-me.san.rr.com> wrote:

John Baker wrote:

I've always been of the opinion that guys like UWS should be
allowed, even encouraged, to rant to their little hearts' content.
As I've often said, one believer like this, given free rein, can do
more to expose the arrogance, hypocrisy and utter worthlessness of
Christianity than 100 atheists could ever hope to.


Yeah, because obviously he's representative of the "average"
Christian.

Idiots come in all denominations, including none at all.

Thanks for demonstrating it.


And thank *you* for demonstrating it. Perhaps you should have asked me
what my point was before resorting to insults. I rest my case.


You mean I should have read your paragraph, grasped its painfully plain
meaning, and then asked you what your point was (even though you'd just
stated it)???

Better yet, maybe reading a few posts in the thread to determine context
would have done much to extricate your head from your *****:
UWS: "Irrelevant. The Bible says nothing about abortions."
Donald's reply:
"Au contraire, you stupid *****....
"God(tm) the Divine Abortion Provider:
Hosea 13:16 ~Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against
her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in
pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.
"Hosea 9:16 ~Ephraim is smitten, their root is dried up, they shall bear no
fruit: yea, though they bring forth, yet will I slay even the beloved fruit
of their womb."
USW's brilliant response: "You are quoting the Jewish Bible, you moron. The
Christian God is OK with
abortions, AFAIK."
Of course, the obvious flaws in his inept reply set him up for the remarks
that John Baker put in his message.
Reading is a marvelous thing. You should try it sometime, rather than having
someone draw you a fucking picture. Or do you subscribe to the "we don't
abide by the Old Testament" theory?
If so, this link's for you:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.misc/msg/065649c92d8d54ec?dmode=source


A real head-scratcher, that.

Not if you'd use your brain. Once you do that, and engage some rational
thought, you'd realize that Baker's point is quite clear.
You'll forgive me if I don't wait for *that miracle to take place.
--
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
.....and ordained minister
Stork Pin recipient: May 1, 2003 -Madelyn
(tm) 2004 G.O.P. All names used without permission from the copyright
holder. ***** 'em.
.
User: "S o r n i"

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 23 Feb 2005 12:51:49 PM
The other Donald wrote:

"S o r n i" <sorni@bite-me.san.rr.com> wrote in message
news:7DpSd.7652$VD5.3201@twister.socal.rr.com...

John Baker wrote:

On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:42:56 GMT, "S o r n i"
<sorni@bite-me.san.rr.com> wrote:

John Baker wrote:

I've always been of the opinion that guys like UWS should be
allowed, even encouraged, to rant to their little hearts' content.
As I've often said, one believer like this, given free rein, can
do more to expose the arrogance, hypocrisy and utter
worthlessness of Christianity than 100 atheists could ever hope
to.


Yeah, because obviously he's representative of the "average"
Christian.

Idiots come in all denominations, including none at all.

Thanks for demonstrating it.


And thank *you* for demonstrating it. Perhaps you should have asked
me what my point was before resorting to insults. I rest my case.


You mean I should have read your paragraph, grasped its painfully
plain meaning, and then asked you what your point was (even though
you'd just stated it)???


Better yet, maybe reading a few posts in the thread to determine
context would have done much to extricate your head from your *****:

UWS: "Irrelevant. The Bible says nothing about abortions."

Donald's reply:
"Au contraire, you stupid *****....

"God(tm) the Divine Abortion Provider:
Hosea 13:16 ~Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled
against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be
dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.

"Hosea 9:16 ~Ephraim is smitten, their root is dried up, they shall
bear no fruit: yea, though they bring forth, yet will I slay even the
beloved fruit of their womb."

USW's brilliant response: "You are quoting the Jewish Bible, you
moron. The Christian God is OK with
abortions, AFAIK."

Of course, the obvious flaws in his inept reply set him up for the
remarks that John Baker put in his message.

Reading is a marvelous thing. You should try it sometime, rather than
having someone draw you a fucking picture. Or do you subscribe to the
"we don't abide by the Old Testament" theory?

If so, this link's for you:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.misc/msg/065649c92d8d54ec?dmode=source




A real head-scratcher, that.


Not if you'd use your brain. Once you do that, and engage some
rational thought, you'd realize that Baker's point is quite clear.

You'll forgive me if I don't wait for *that miracle to take place.

He made a self-contained declarative statement, and your "content" does
nothing to change or even flavor its meaning.
Here it is again for you: "As I've often said, one believer like this,
given free rein, can do more to expose the arrogance, hypocrisy and utter
worthlessness of Christianity than 100 atheists could ever hope to."
His point IS quite clear; it's just that it's as full of ***** as you are.
HAND.
.
User: "The other Donald"

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 23 Feb 2005 05:25:52 PM
"S o r n i" <sorni@bite-me.san.rr.com> wrote in message
news:9h4Td.29978$Tj7.16619@twister.socal.rr.com...

The other Donald wrote:

"S o r n i" <sorni@bite-me.san.rr.com> wrote in message
news:7DpSd.7652$VD5.3201@twister.socal.rr.com...

John Baker wrote:

On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:42:56 GMT, "S o r n i"
<sorni@bite-me.san.rr.com> wrote:

John Baker wrote:

I've always been of the opinion that guys like UWS should be
allowed, even encouraged, to rant to their little hearts' content.
As I've often said, one believer like this, given free rein, can
do more to expose the arrogance, hypocrisy and utter
worthlessness of Christianity than 100 atheists could ever hope
to.


Yeah, because obviously he's representative of the "average"
Christian.

Idiots come in all denominations, including none at all.

Thanks for demonstrating it.


And thank *you* for demonstrating it. Perhaps you should have asked
me what my point was before resorting to insults. I rest my case.


You mean I should have read your paragraph, grasped its painfully
plain meaning, and then asked you what your point was (even though
you'd just stated it)???


Better yet, maybe reading a few posts in the thread to determine
context would have done much to extricate your head from your *****:

UWS: "Irrelevant. The Bible says nothing about abortions."

Donald's reply:
"Au contraire, you stupid *****....

"God(tm) the Divine Abortion Provider:
Hosea 13:16 ~Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled
against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be
dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.

"Hosea 9:16 ~Ephraim is smitten, their root is dried up, they shall
bear no fruit: yea, though they bring forth, yet will I slay even the
beloved fruit of their womb."

USW's brilliant response: "You are quoting the Jewish Bible, you
moron. The Christian God is OK with
abortions, AFAIK."

Of course, the obvious flaws in his inept reply set him up for the
remarks that John Baker put in his message.

Reading is a marvelous thing. You should try it sometime, rather than
having someone draw you a fucking picture. Or do you subscribe to the
"we don't abide by the Old Testament" theory?

If so, this link's for you:


http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.misc/msg/065649c92d8d54ec?dmode=source




A real head-scratcher, that.


Not if you'd use your brain. Once you do that, and engage some
rational thought, you'd realize that Baker's point is quite clear.

You'll forgive me if I don't wait for *that miracle to take place.


He made a self-contained declarative statement, and your "content" does
nothing to change or even flavor its meaning.

Like hell it doesn't. Barker's post has *everything* to do with context. He
did not make an arbitrary statement. It was within the thread and context of
UWS's statements, and a follow up to my remark of:
Donald to UWS: "Holy *****, this get's better by the minute....You certainly
are a stupid sonofabitch. In fact, you are so fucking stupid that you don't
even realize just how stupid your remarks truly are."
He also prefaced it with <snipped for brevity> . Obviously, you missed that,
too, because to acknowledge it would shoot your 'observation' right between
the eyes.


Here it is again for you: "As I've often said, one believer like this,
given free rein, can do more to expose the arrogance, hypocrisy and utter
worthlessness of Christianity than 100 atheists could ever hope to."

A clear case of selective quoting out of context, but typical of you
dumbfucks.
Baker's statement was not meant to be a standalone comment, and that is
quite clear even within the part of his statement you bothered to quote.
So, once again, I have to draw you ignorant fucktards a picture: "...one
believer like this,..." It is explicitly clear that his remark relies on the
previous posts in the thread, namely those of 'UWS.' Here's your second
clue, dumbass: that's called "context."

His point IS quite clear;

Especially when one is literate and intelligent enough to actually follow
along with a series of exchanges. Alas, you do not rise to the occasion.
He is not only right, but you're an incompetent, disingenuous dipshit.

it's just that it's as full of ***** as you are.

Hardly. Baker nailed you dumbasses perfectly, as evidenced by your retort
that relies on ADHD to make any fucking sense.


HAND.

FOAD
--
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
.....and ordained minister
Stork Pin recipient: May 1, 2003 -Madelyn
(tm) 2004 G.O.P. All names used without permission from the copyright
holder. ***** 'em.
.
User: "S o r n i"

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 23 Feb 2005 07:33:38 PM
The other Donald wrote:

"S o r n i" <sorni@bite-me.san.rr.com> wrote in message
news:9h4Td.29978$Tj7.16619@twister.socal.rr.com...

The other Donald wrote:

"S o r n i" <sorni@bite-me.san.rr.com> wrote in message
news:7DpSd.7652$VD5.3201@twister.socal.rr.com...

John Baker wrote:

On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:42:56 GMT, "S o r n i"
<sorni@bite-me.san.rr.com> wrote:

John Baker wrote:

I've always been of the opinion that guys like UWS should be
allowed, even encouraged, to rant to their little hearts'
content. As I've often said, one believer like this, given free
rein, can do more to expose the arrogance, hypocrisy and utter
worthlessness of Christianity than 100 atheists could ever hope
to.


Yeah, because obviously he's representative of the "average"
Christian.

Idiots come in all denominations, including none at all.

Thanks for demonstrating it.


And thank *you* for demonstrating it. Perhaps you should have
asked me what my point was before resorting to insults. I rest my
case.


You mean I should have read your paragraph, grasped its painfully
plain meaning, and then asked you what your point was (even though
you'd just stated it)???


Better yet, maybe reading a few posts in the thread to determine
context would have done much to extricate your head from your *****:

UWS: "Irrelevant. The Bible says nothing about abortions."

Donald's reply:
"Au contraire, you stupid *****....

"God(tm) the Divine Abortion Provider:
Hosea 13:16 ~Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled
against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall
be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.

"Hosea 9:16 ~Ephraim is smitten, their root is dried up, they shall
bear no fruit: yea, though they bring forth, yet will I slay even
the beloved fruit of their womb."

USW's brilliant response: "You are quoting the Jewish Bible, you
moron. The Christian God is OK with
abortions, AFAIK."

Of course, the obvious flaws in his inept reply set him up for the
remarks that John Baker put in his message.

Reading is a marvelous thing. You should try it sometime, rather
than having someone draw you a fucking picture. Or do you subscribe
to the "we don't abide by the Old Testament" theory?

If so, this link's for you:



http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.misc/msg/065649c92d8d54ec?dmode=source




A real head-scratcher, that.


Not if you'd use your brain. Once you do that, and engage some
rational thought, you'd realize that Baker's point is quite clear.

You'll forgive me if I don't wait for *that miracle to take place.


He made a self-contained declarative statement, and your "content"
does nothing to change or even flavor its meaning.


Like hell it doesn't. Barker's post has *everything* to do with
context. He did not make an arbitrary statement. It was within the
thread and context of UWS's statements, and a follow up to my remark
of:

Donald to UWS: "Holy *****, this get's better by the minute....You
certainly are a stupid sonofabitch. In fact, you are so fucking
stupid that you don't even realize just how stupid your remarks truly
are."

He also prefaced it with <snipped for brevity> . Obviously, you
missed that, too, because to acknowledge it would shoot your
'observation' right between the eyes.



Here it is again for you: "As I've often said, one believer like
this, given free rein, can do more to expose the arrogance,
hypocrisy and utter worthlessness of Christianity than 100 atheists
could ever hope to."


A clear case of selective quoting out of context, but typical of you
dumbfucks.

Baker's statement was not meant to be a standalone comment, and that
is quite clear even within the part of his statement you bothered to
quote.

So, once again, I have to draw you ignorant fucktards a picture:
"...one believer like this,..." It is explicitly clear that his
remark relies on the previous posts in the thread, namely those of
'UWS.' Here's your second clue, dumbass: that's called "context."


His point IS quite clear;


Especially when one is literate and intelligent enough to actually
follow along with a series of exchanges. Alas, you do not rise to the
occasion.

He is not only right, but you're an incompetent, disingenuous dipshit.


it's just that it's as full of ***** as you are.


Hardly. Baker nailed you dumbasses perfectly, as evidenced by your
retort that relies on ADHD to make any fucking sense.



HAND.


FOAD

God you waste a lot of time on this *****.
KMA.
.
User: "The other Donald"

Title: Re: me first, ***** you 23 Feb 2005 08:30:39 PM
"S o r n i" <sorni@bite-me.san.rr.com> wrote in message
news:S9aTd.30607$Tj7.26455@twister.socal.rr.com...

The other Donald wrote:

"S o r n i" <sorni@bite-me.san.rr.com> wrote in message
news:9h4Td.29978$Tj7.16619@twister.socal.rr.com...

The other Donald wrote:

"S o r n i" <sorni@bite-me.san.rr.com> wrote in message
news:7DpSd.7652$VD5.3201@twister.socal.rr.com...

John Baker wrote:

On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:42:56 GMT, "S o r n i"
<sorni@bite-me.san.rr.com> wrote:

John Baker wrote:

I've always been of the opinion that guys like UWS should be
allowed, even encouraged, to rant to their little hearts'
content. As I've often said, one believer like this, given free
rein, can do more to expose the arrogance, hypocrisy and utter
worthlessness of Christianity than 100 atheists could ever hope
to.


Yeah, because obviously he's representative of the "average"
Christian.

Idiots come in all denominations, including none at all.

Thanks for demonstrating it.


And thank *you* for demonstrating it. Perhaps you should have
asked me what my point was before resorting to insults. I rest my
case.


You mean I should have read your paragraph, grasped its painfully
plain meaning, and then asked you what your point was (even though
you'd just stated it)???


Better yet, maybe reading a few posts in the thread to determine
context would have done much to extricate your head from your *****:

UWS: "Irrelevant. The Bible says nothing about abortions."

Donald's reply:
"Au contraire, you stupid *****....

"God(tm) the Divine Abortion Provider:
Hosea 13:16 ~Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled
against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall
be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.

"Hosea 9:16 ~Ephraim is smitten, their root is dried up, they shall
bear no fruit: yea, though they bring forth, yet will I slay even
the beloved fruit of their womb."

USW's brilliant response: "You are quoting the Jewish Bible, you
moron. The Christian God is OK with
abortions, AFAIK."

Of course, the obvious flaws in his inept reply set him up for the
remarks that John Baker put in his message.

Reading is a marvelous thing. You should try it sometime, rather
than having someone draw you a fucking picture. Or do you subscribe
to the "we don't abide by the Old Testament" theory?

If so, this link's for you:




http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.misc/msg/065649c92d8d54ec?dmode=source




A real head-scratcher, that.


Not if you'd use your brain. Once you do that, and engage some
rational thought, you'd realize that Baker's point is quite clear.

You'll forgive me if I don't wait for *that miracle to take place.


He made a self-contained declarative statement, and your "content"
does nothing to change or even flavor its meaning.


Like hell it doesn't. Barker's post has *everything* to do with
context. He did not make an arbitrary statement. It was within the
thread and context of UWS's statements, and a follow up to my remark
of:

Donald to UWS: "Holy *****, this get's better by the minute....You
certainly are a stupid sonofabitch. In fact, you are so fucking
stupid that you don't even realize just how stupid your remarks truly
are."

He also prefaced it with <snipped for brevity> . Obviously, you
missed that, too, because to acknowledge it would shoot your
'observation' right between the eyes.



Here it is again for you: "As I've often said, one believer like
this, given free rein, can do more to expose the arrogance,
hypocrisy and utter worthlessness of Christianity than 100 atheists
could ever hope to."


A clear case of selective quoting out of context, but typical of you
dumbfucks.

Baker's statement was not meant to be a standalone comment, and that
is quite clear even within the part of his statement you bothered to
quote.

So, once again, I have to draw you ignorant fucktards a picture:
"...one believer like this,..." It is explicitly clear that his
remark relies on the previous posts in the thread, namely those of
'UWS.' Here's your second clue, dumbass: that's called "context."


His point IS quite clear;


Especially when one is literate and intelligent enough to actually
follow along with a series of exchanges. Alas, you do not rise to the
occasion.

He is not only right, but you're an incompetent, disingenuous dipshit.


it's just that it's as full of ***** as you are.


Hardly. Baker nailed you dumbasses perfectly, as evidenced by your
retort that relies on ADHD to make any fucking sense.



HAND.


FOAD


God you waste a lot of time on this *****.

It must seem that way to a dumbfuck like you that is incapable of thinking
in complex terms, or saying anything beyond the five-second sound bite. You
must be a conceited ***** to actually believe that you're the first
person to stagger down this rabbit trail. Atheists could almost start an FAQ
to address your load of unoriginal *****.
I'll take your statement as an unconditional surrender to the facts.

KMA.

GFYS.
<plonk>
--
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
.....and ordained minister
Stork pin recipient: May 1, 2003 -Madelyn
.
















  Page 1 of 4

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106