Religions > Atheism > Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim."
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Michelle Malkin" |
| Date: |
27 Nov 2006 07:21:06 PM |
| Object: |
Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
Michael J. Fox: 'I Could Give a Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity.I'm Not A
Victim'
Rush Limbaugh has smeared Michael J. Fox, claiming that he exaggerated the
symptoms of his Parkinson's disease in an ad supporting embryonic stem cell
research. (He also mocked Fox by impersonating tremors associated with the
disease on air.) In an effort to deflect criticism, Limbaugh told Katie
Couric the following: "I believe Democrats have a long history of using
victims of various things as political spokespeople because they believe
they are untouchable, infallible, they are immune from criticism."
Last night on CBS, Fox fired back, telling Couric, "I could give a damn
about Rush Limbaugh's pity or anyone else's pity. I'm not a victim."
Transcript:
COURIC: I called Rush Limbaugh and he told me: I believe Democrats have a
long history of using victims of various things as political spokespeople
because they believe they are untouchable, infallible, they are immune from
criticism.
FOX: Well, first thing, he used the word victim. And on another occasion I
heard him use the word pitiable. And understand, nobody in this position
wants pity. We don't want pity. I could give a damn about Rush Limbaugh's
pity or anyone else's pity. I'm not a victim. I'm someone who is in this
situation. I think I'm in this situation along with millions of other
Americans, and we have a right, if there's answers out there, to pursue
those answers with the full support of our politicians. And so I don't need
anyone's permission to do that.
COURIC: You have said before this is a bipartisan problem that requires a
bipartisan solution.
FOX: No, disease is a nonpartisan problem that requires a bipartisan
solution.
COURIC: Would you support a Republican candidate?
FOX: I have. Arlen Specter is my guy. I have campaigned for Arlen Specter.
He has been a fantastic champion of stem cell research. In the meantime,
separate and apart from my political involvement, I've started a foundation
that has raised $85 million for research and is the second leading funder of
Parkinson's research after the federal government.
And, you know, it's not - I'm not a Johnny-come-lately. Nobody plucked me
off the apple cart to come and do this. I mean, I believe in this cause. I
put a lot of my life and energy into it, and I'm serious about it.
From Think Progress
.
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
27 Oct 2006 10:23:19 PM |
|
|
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:9tCdncja0c77P9_YnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
In an effort to deflect criticism, Limbaugh told Katie Couric the
following: "I believe Democrats have a long history of using victims of
various things as political spokespeople...
Uh...how about the most infamous use of victims for political
puposes...Terry Schiavo...and Rush, you big fat fucking hypocrite, were one
of the cruelest perpetrators of this hoax on the religious sheeple.
Last night on CBS, Fox fired back, telling Couric, "I could give a damn
about Rush Limbaugh's pity or anyone else's pity. I'm not a victim."
Mike Fox is a one impressive fella.
COURIC: Would you support a Republican candidate?
FOX: I have. Arlen Specter is my guy. I have campaigned for Arlen
Specter.
Touché, Mike. So much for anything Rush has to say. There isn't a damn thing
that comes out of that mother-fucker's mouth that isn't partisan.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rusty Sites" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity...I'm Not A Victim." |
28 Oct 2006 12:31:45 AM |
|
|
Geoff wrote:
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:9tCdncja0c77P9_YnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
In an effort to deflect criticism, Limbaugh told Katie Couric the
following: "I believe Democrats have a long history of using victims of
various things as political spokespeople...
Uh...how about the most infamous use of victims for political
puposes...Terry Schiavo...and Rush, you big fat fucking hypocrite, were one
of the cruelest perpetrators of this hoax on the religious sheeple.
Last night on CBS, Fox fired back, telling Couric, "I could give a damn
about Rush Limbaugh's pity or anyone else's pity. I'm not a victim."
Mike Fox is a one impressive fella.
COURIC: Would you support a Republican candidate?
FOX: I have. Arlen Specter is my guy. I have campaigned for Arlen
Specter.
Touché, Mike. So much for anything Rush has to say. There isn't a damn thing
that comes out of that mother-fucker's mouth that isn't partisan.
I have noticed that. I haven't listened to that great font of ignorance
in a while, but when I did, I was struck by the ads during his show. I
got the impression that the advertisers thought they had a really
gullible audience out there. Ads for products that would regrow hair on
totally bald men, get rich quick schemes, and the like.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
30 Oct 2006 06:11:03 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 22:31:45 -0700, Rusty Sites
<SpamMeSucker@xemaps.com> wrote in alt.atheism
Geoff wrote:
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:9tCdncja0c77P9_YnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
In an effort to deflect criticism, Limbaugh told Katie Couric the
following: "I believe Democrats have a long history of using victims of
various things as political spokespeople...
Uh...how about the most infamous use of victims for political
puposes...Terry Schiavo...and Rush, you big fat fucking hypocrite, were one
of the cruelest perpetrators of this hoax on the religious sheeple.
Last night on CBS, Fox fired back, telling Couric, "I could give a damn
about Rush Limbaugh's pity or anyone else's pity. I'm not a victim."
Mike Fox is a one impressive fella.
COURIC: Would you support a Republican candidate?
FOX: I have. Arlen Specter is my guy. I have campaigned for Arlen
Specter.
Touché, Mike. So much for anything Rush has to say. There isn't a damn thing
that comes out of that mother-fucker's mouth that isn't partisan.
I have noticed that. I haven't listened to that great font of ignorance
in a while, but when I did, I was struck by the ads during his show. I
got the impression that the advertisers thought they had a really
gullible audience out there.
They demonstratably do.
Ads for products that would regrow hair on
totally bald men, get rich quick schemes, and the like.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
28 Oct 2006 02:43:33 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 23:23:19 -0400, "Geoff" <geoff@nospam.com> wrote:
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:9tCdncja0c77P9_YnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
In an effort to deflect criticism, Limbaugh told Katie Couric the
following: "I believe Democrats have a long history of using victims of
various things as political spokespeople...
Uh...how about the most infamous use of victims for political
puposes...Terry Schiavo...and Rush, you big fat fucking hypocrite, were one
of the cruelest perpetrators of this hoax on the religious sheeple.
Last night on CBS, Fox fired back, telling Couric, "I could give a damn
about Rush Limbaugh's pity or anyone else's pity. I'm not a victim."
Mike Fox is a one impressive fella.
COURIC: Would you support a Republican candidate?
FOX: I have. Arlen Specter is my guy. I have campaigned for Arlen
Specter.
Touché, Mike. So much for anything Rush has to say. There isn't a damn thing
that comes out of that mother-fucker's mouth that isn't partisan.
There isn't anything that comes out of that *****'s mouth that
bears any resemblance to the truth.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
02 Nov 2006 11:45:36 AM |
|
|
John Baker wrote:
There isn't anything that comes out of that *****'s mouth that
bears any resemblance to the truth.
If you worked out the averages, he probably makes a nickel every
time someone says that about him - he's a sideshow act
entertainer, has said as much himself, his income depends
on people noticing him.
--
Walt Smith
Firelock on DALNet
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
02 Nov 2006 12:51:45 PM |
|
|
On 2 Nov 2006 09:45:36 -0800, wrote:
John Baker wrote:
There isn't anything that comes out of that *****'s mouth that
bears any resemblance to the truth.
If you worked out the averages, he probably makes a nickel every
time someone says that about him - he's a sideshow act
entertainer, has said as much himself, his income depends
on people noticing him.
Well, as H. L. Mencken said, nobody ever went broke underestimating
the taste (or intelligence) of the American public.
Sure, Limbaugh is basically a clown without the makeup. I know that,
you know that, and Limbaugh knows it. No intelligent person would take
him seriously for a second. The problem is, there are too many
*unintelligent* people out there who *do* take him seriously to let
him go unchallenged.
Same goes for Coulter.
--
Walt Smith
Firelock on DALNet
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
02 Nov 2006 03:29:50 PM |
|
|
John Baker wrote:
On 2 Nov 2006 09:45:36 -0800, wrote:
John Baker wrote:
There isn't anything that comes out of that *****'s mouth that
bears any resemblance to the truth.
If you worked out the averages, he probably makes a nickel every
time someone says that about him - he's a sideshow act
entertainer, has said as much himself, his income depends
on people noticing him.
Well, as H. L. Mencken said, nobody ever went broke underestimating
the taste (or intelligence) of the American public.
I think Mencken added an extraneous instance of "American"
to that statement. ;-)
Sure, Limbaugh is basically a clown without the makeup. I know that,
you know that, and Limbaugh knows it. No intelligent person would take
him seriously for a second. The problem is, there are too many
*unintelligent* people out there who *do* take him seriously to let
him go unchallenged.
He, Coulter and his entire end of the political spectrum don't have
any kind of monopoly on attracting useful idiots.
--
Walt Smith
Firelock on DALNet
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
02 Nov 2006 05:13:26 PM |
|
|
On 2 Nov 2006 13:29:50 -0800, wrote:
He, Coulter and his entire end of the political spectrum don't have
any kind of monopoly on attracting useful idiots.
No, they just have a much easier job than someone on the other end
would.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"Properly read, the Bible is the most potent force for atheism ever conceived."
- Isaac Asimov
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
03 Nov 2006 08:31:44 AM |
|
|
Al Klein wrote:
On 2 Nov 2006 13:29:50 -0800, wrote:
He, Coulter and his entire end of the political spectrum don't have
any kind of monopoly on attracting useful idiots.
No, they just have a much easier job than someone on the other end
would.
Would you like a hand with that beam, or are you too busy
with the motes for now?
--
Walt Smith
Firelock on DALNet
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
03 Nov 2006 03:58:44 PM |
|
|
On 3 Nov 2006 06:31:44 -0800, wrote:
Al Klein wrote:
On 2 Nov 2006 13:29:50 -0800, wrote:
He, Coulter and his entire end of the political spectrum don't have
any kind of monopoly on attracting useful idiots.
No, they just have a much easier job than someone on the other end
would.
Would you like a hand with that beam, or are you too busy
with the motes for now?
Beam? Motes? You must think I look Christian.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
05 Nov 2006 07:37:00 PM |
|
|
Al Klein wrote:
On 3 Nov 2006 06:31:44 -0800, wrote:
Al Klein wrote:
On 2 Nov 2006 13:29:50 -0800, wrote:
He, Coulter and his entire end of the political spectrum don't have
any kind of monopoly on attracting useful idiots.
No, they just have a much easier job than someone on the other end
would.
Would you like a hand with that beam, or are you too busy
with the motes for now?
Beam? Motes? You must think I look Christian.
I'm sure you have a whole list in your head of how I "must"
see the world. And it's all perfectly accurate, of course.
Every single bit.
--
Walt Smith
Firelock on DALNet
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
05 Nov 2006 09:14:14 PM |
|
|
On 5 Nov 2006 17:37:00 -0800, wrote:
Al Klein wrote:
On 3 Nov 2006 06:31:44 -0800, wrote:
Al Klein wrote:
On 2 Nov 2006 13:29:50 -0800, wrote:
He, Coulter and his entire end of the political spectrum don't have
any kind of monopoly on attracting useful idiots.
No, they just have a much easier job than someone on the other end
would.
Would you like a hand with that beam, or are you too busy
with the motes for now?
Beam? Motes? You must think I look Christian.
I'm sure you have a whole list in your head of how I "must"
see the world. And it's all perfectly accurate, of course.
Every single bit.
If it walks like a Christian, and it talks like a Christian, and it
quotes from the Christian Bible as if the Bible were true, it must be
a Christian or ex-Christian.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"Nothing in biology makes sense without evolution."
- Theodosuis Dobzhansky
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
05 Nov 2006 09:39:04 PM |
|
|
Al Klein wrote:
On 5 Nov 2006 17:37:00 -0800, wrote:
Al Klein wrote:
On 3 Nov 2006 06:31:44 -0800, wrote:
Al Klein wrote:
On 2 Nov 2006 13:29:50 -0800, wrote:
He, Coulter and his entire end of the political spectrum don't have
any kind of monopoly on attracting useful idiots.
No, they just have a much easier job than someone on the other end
would.
Would you like a hand with that beam, or are you too busy
with the motes for now?
Beam? Motes? You must think I look Christian.
I'm sure you have a whole list in your head of how I "must"
see the world. And it's all perfectly accurate, of course.
Every single bit.
If it walks like a Christian, and it talks like a Christian, and it
quotes from the Christian Bible as if the Bible were true, it must be
a Christian or ex-Christian.
So knowledge of the christian bible sufficient to use some
extremely well-known quotations indicates that the user
believes the christian bible to be true? Could you tell me a
bit more about what "must" be true about me? It's all so
fascinating, especially since I know you'd never be the
judgemental sort to believe things about people just
because of your own prejudices and all.
--
Walt Smith
Firelock on DALNet
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
02 Nov 2006 05:26:00 PM |
|
|
On 2 Nov 2006 13:29:50 -0800, wrote:
John Baker wrote:
On 2 Nov 2006 09:45:36 -0800, wrote:
John Baker wrote:
There isn't anything that comes out of that *****'s mouth that
bears any resemblance to the truth.
If you worked out the averages, he probably makes a nickel every
time someone says that about him - he's a sideshow act
entertainer, has said as much himself, his income depends
on people noticing him.
Well, as H. L. Mencken said, nobody ever went broke underestimating
the taste (or intelligence) of the American public.
I think Mencken added an extraneous instance of "American"
to that statement. ;-)
Sure, Limbaugh is basically a clown without the makeup. I know that,
you know that, and Limbaugh knows it. No intelligent person would take
him seriously for a second. The problem is, there are too many
*unintelligent* people out there who *do* take him seriously to let
him go unchallenged.
He, Coulter and his entire end of the political spectrum don't have
any kind of monopoly on attracting useful idiots.
I'm sure guys like Franken and Moore attract their share from the
other lunatic fringe, but for some reason, they don't seem to make it
into the headlines nearly as often as Limbaugh and Coulter.
--
Walt Smith
Firelock on DALNet
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
03 Nov 2006 08:38:51 AM |
|
|
John Baker wrote:
On 2 Nov 2006 13:29:50 -0800, wrote:
John Baker wrote:
On 2 Nov 2006 09:45:36 -0800, wrote:
John Baker wrote:
There isn't anything that comes out of that *****'s mouth that
bears any resemblance to the truth.
If you worked out the averages, he probably makes a nickel every
time someone says that about him - he's a sideshow act
entertainer, has said as much himself, his income depends
on people noticing him.
Well, as H. L. Mencken said, nobody ever went broke underestimating
the taste (or intelligence) of the American public.
I think Mencken added an extraneous instance of "American"
to that statement. ;-)
Sure, Limbaugh is basically a clown without the makeup. I know that,
you know that, and Limbaugh knows it. No intelligent person would take
him seriously for a second. The problem is, there are too many
*unintelligent* people out there who *do* take him seriously to let
him go unchallenged.
He, Coulter and his entire end of the political spectrum don't have
any kind of monopoly on attracting useful idiots.
I'm sure guys like Franken and Moore attract their share from the
other lunatic fringe, but for some reason, they don't seem to make it
into the headlines nearly as often as Limbaugh and Coulter.
I think it has to do with the old "Dog Bites Man" vs "Man Bites Dog"
bit about what gets into the headlines. Most of what Franken
and Moore are saying is accepted as fact by most of the people
who decide what is news, newswriters don't give many headlines
to people the see as behaving normally.
--
Walt Smith
Firelock on DALNet
The opinions stated above are either my own, or have been
inserted by the NSA to discredit me. Choose wisely.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
28 Oct 2006 01:35:54 AM |
|
|
In article <9tCdncja0c77P9_YnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
Michael J. Fox: 'I Could Give a Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity.I'm Not A
Victim'
Rush Limbaugh has smeared Michael J. Fox, claiming that he exaggerated the
symptoms of his Parkinson's disease in an ad supporting embryonic stem cell
research. (He also mocked Fox by impersonating tremors associated with the
disease on air.) In an effort to deflect criticism, Limbaugh told Katie
Couric the following: "I believe Democrats have a long history of using
victims of various things as political spokespeople because they believe
they are untouchable, infallible, they are immune from criticism."
Last night on CBS, Fox fired back, telling Couric, "I could give a damn
about Rush Limbaugh's pity or anyone else's pity. I'm not a victim."
Transcript:
COURIC: I called Rush Limbaugh and he told me: I believe Democrats have a
long history of using victims of various things as political spokespeople
because they believe they are untouchable, infallible, they are immune from
criticism.
FOX: Well, first thing, he used the word victim. And on another occasion I
heard him use the word pitiable. And understand, nobody in this position
wants pity. We don't want pity. I could give a damn about Rush Limbaugh's
pity or anyone else's pity. I'm not a victim. I'm someone who is in this
situation. I think I'm in this situation along with millions of other
Americans, and we have a right, if there's answers out there, to pursue
those answers with the full support of our politicians. And so I don't need
anyone's permission to do that.
COURIC: You have said before this is a bipartisan problem that requires a
bipartisan solution.
FOX: No, disease is a nonpartisan problem that requires a bipartisan
solution.
COURIC: Would you support a Republican candidate?
FOX: I have. Arlen Specter is my guy. I have campaigned for Arlen Specter.
He has been a fantastic champion of stem cell research. In the meantime,
separate and apart from my political involvement, I've started a foundation
that has raised $85 million for research and is the second leading funder of
Parkinson's research after the federal government.
And, you know, it's not - I'm not a Johnny-come-lately. Nobody plucked me
off the apple cart to come and do this. I mean, I believe in this cause. I
put a lot of my life and energy into it, and I'm serious about it.
From Think Progress
Michael Fox is a class guy. Limbaugh is a gross obscene drug addicted
wind bag.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
28 Nov 2006 02:26:45 AM |
|
|
"johac" <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-6A1B71.23355427102006@news.giganews.com...
In article <9tCdncja0c77P9_YnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
Michael J. Fox: 'I Could Give a Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity.I'm Not A
Victim'
Rush Limbaugh has smeared Michael J. Fox, claiming that he exaggerated
the
symptoms of his Parkinson's disease in an ad supporting embryonic stem
cell
research. (He also mocked Fox by impersonating tremors associated with
the
disease on air.) In an effort to deflect criticism, Limbaugh told Katie
Couric the following: "I believe Democrats have a long history of using
victims of various things as political spokespeople because they believe
they are untouchable, infallible, they are immune from criticism."
Last night on CBS, Fox fired back, telling Couric, "I could give a damn
about Rush Limbaugh's pity or anyone else's pity. I'm not a victim."
Transcript:
COURIC: I called Rush Limbaugh and he told me: I believe Democrats have
a
long history of using victims of various things as political spokespeople
because they believe they are untouchable, infallible, they are immune
from
criticism.
FOX: Well, first thing, he used the word victim. And on another
occasion I
heard him use the word pitiable. And understand, nobody in this position
wants pity. We don't want pity. I could give a damn about Rush Limbaugh's
pity or anyone else's pity. I'm not a victim. I'm someone who is in this
situation. I think I'm in this situation along with millions of other
Americans, and we have a right, if there's answers out there, to pursue
those answers with the full support of our politicians. And so I don't
need
anyone's permission to do that.
COURIC: You have said before this is a bipartisan problem that requires
a
bipartisan solution.
FOX: No, disease is a nonpartisan problem that requires a bipartisan
solution.
COURIC: Would you support a Republican candidate?
FOX: I have. Arlen Specter is my guy. I have campaigned for Arlen
Specter.
He has been a fantastic champion of stem cell research. In the meantime,
separate and apart from my political involvement, I've started a
foundation
that has raised $85 million for research and is the second leading funder
of
Parkinson's research after the federal government.
And, you know, it's not - I'm not a Johnny-come-lately. Nobody plucked
me
off the apple cart to come and do this. I mean, I believe in this cause.
I
put a lot of my life and energy into it, and I'm serious about it.
From Think Progress
Michael Fox is a class guy. Limbaugh is a gross obscene drug addicted
wind bag.
I'm hoping he loses some of his audience due to this,
but I doubt it. Anyone who's stuck with Limbaugh
this long is probably a hopeless case.
--
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Michelle Malkin (Mickey) aa list#1
BAAWA Knight & Bible Thumper Thumper
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit
atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
29 Oct 2006 12:48:11 AM |
|
|
In article <qpydnblugs26m97YnZ2dnUVZ_uqdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-6A1B71.23355427102006@news.giganews.com...
In article <9tCdncja0c77P9_YnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
Michael J. Fox: 'I Could Give a Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity.I'm Not A
Victim'
Rush Limbaugh has smeared Michael J. Fox, claiming that he exaggerated
the
symptoms of his Parkinson's disease in an ad supporting embryonic stem
cell
research. (He also mocked Fox by impersonating tremors associated with
the
disease on air.) In an effort to deflect criticism, Limbaugh told Katie
Couric the following: "I believe Democrats have a long history of using
victims of various things as political spokespeople because they believe
they are untouchable, infallible, they are immune from criticism."
Last night on CBS, Fox fired back, telling Couric, "I could give a damn
about Rush Limbaugh's pity or anyone else's pity. I'm not a victim."
Transcript:
COURIC: I called Rush Limbaugh and he told me: I believe Democrats have
a
long history of using victims of various things as political spokespeople
because they believe they are untouchable, infallible, they are immune
from
criticism.
FOX: Well, first thing, he used the word victim. And on another
occasion I
heard him use the word pitiable. And understand, nobody in this position
wants pity. We don't want pity. I could give a damn about Rush Limbaugh's
pity or anyone else's pity. I'm not a victim. I'm someone who is in this
situation. I think I'm in this situation along with millions of other
Americans, and we have a right, if there's answers out there, to pursue
those answers with the full support of our politicians. And so I don't
need
anyone's permission to do that.
COURIC: You have said before this is a bipartisan problem that requires
a
bipartisan solution.
FOX: No, disease is a nonpartisan problem that requires a bipartisan
solution.
COURIC: Would you support a Republican candidate?
FOX: I have. Arlen Specter is my guy. I have campaigned for Arlen
Specter.
He has been a fantastic champion of stem cell research. In the meantime,
separate and apart from my political involvement, I've started a
foundation
that has raised $85 million for research and is the second leading funder
of
Parkinson's research after the federal government.
And, you know, it's not - I'm not a Johnny-come-lately. Nobody plucked
me
off the apple cart to come and do this. I mean, I believe in this cause.
I
put a lot of my life and energy into it, and I'm serious about it.
From Think Progress
Michael Fox is a class guy. Limbaugh is a gross obscene drug addicted
wind bag.
I'm hoping he loses some of his audience due to this,
but I doubt it. Anyone who's stuck with Limbaugh
this long is probably a hopeless case.
I don't understand how anyone can stand him. He's entitled to his
opinions, but he is also obnoxious, rude, and disgusting. He appeals to
the lowest common denominator. That O'Reilly character is another one.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
29 Oct 2006 01:55:36 AM |
|
|
"johac" <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-77FBC7.22481128102006@news.giganews.com...
In article <qpydnblugs26m97YnZ2dnUVZ_uqdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-6A1B71.23355427102006@news.giganews.com...
In article <9tCdncja0c77P9_YnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
Michael J. Fox: 'I Could Give a Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity.I'm
Not A
Victim'
Rush Limbaugh has smeared Michael J. Fox, claiming that he exaggerated
the
symptoms of his Parkinson's disease in an ad supporting embryonic stem
cell
research. (He also mocked Fox by impersonating tremors associated with
the
disease on air.) In an effort to deflect criticism, Limbaugh told
Katie
Couric the following: "I believe Democrats have a long history of
using
victims of various things as political spokespeople because they
believe
they are untouchable, infallible, they are immune from criticism."
Last night on CBS, Fox fired back, telling Couric, "I could give a
damn
about Rush Limbaugh's pity or anyone else's pity. I'm not a victim."
Transcript:
COURIC: I called Rush Limbaugh and he told me: I believe Democrats
have
a
long history of using victims of various things as political
spokespeople
because they believe they are untouchable, infallible, they are immune
from
criticism.
FOX: Well, first thing, he used the word victim. And on another
occasion I
heard him use the word pitiable. And understand, nobody in this
position
wants pity. We don't want pity. I could give a damn about Rush
Limbaugh's
pity or anyone else's pity. I'm not a victim. I'm someone who is in
this
situation. I think I'm in this situation along with millions of other
Americans, and we have a right, if there's answers out there, to
pursue
those answers with the full support of our politicians. And so I don't
need
anyone's permission to do that.
COURIC: You have said before this is a bipartisan problem that
requires
a
bipartisan solution.
FOX: No, disease is a nonpartisan problem that requires a bipartisan
solution.
COURIC: Would you support a Republican candidate?
FOX: I have. Arlen Specter is my guy. I have campaigned for Arlen
Specter.
He has been a fantastic champion of stem cell research. In the
meantime,
separate and apart from my political involvement, I've started a
foundation
that has raised $85 million for research and is the second leading
funder
of
Parkinson's research after the federal government.
And, you know, it's not - I'm not a Johnny-come-lately. Nobody
plucked
me
off the apple cart to come and do this. I mean, I believe in this
cause.
I
put a lot of my life and energy into it, and I'm serious about it.
From Think Progress
Michael Fox is a class guy. Limbaugh is a gross obscene drug addicted
wind bag.
I'm hoping he loses some of his audience due to this,
but I doubt it. Anyone who's stuck with Limbaugh
this long is probably a hopeless case.
I don't understand how anyone can stand him. He's entitled to his
opinions, but he is also obnoxious, rude, and disgusting. He appeals to
the lowest common denominator. That O'Reilly character is another one.
I LOVE the way Keith Olberman goes after O'Reilly.
And, O'Reilly deserves every bit of it. He really is
obnoxious. The Worst Person In The World! Well,
for a couple funny minutes, anyway.
--
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Michelle Malkin (Mickey) aa list#1
BAAWA Knight & Bible Thumper Thumper
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit
atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
30 Oct 2006 12:05:57 AM |
|
|
In article <ooWdnS0i-o36zdnYnZ2dnUVZ_sWdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-77FBC7.22481128102006@news.giganews.com...
In article <qpydnblugs26m97YnZ2dnUVZ_uqdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-6A1B71.23355427102006@news.giganews.com...
In article <9tCdncja0c77P9_YnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
Michael J. Fox: 'I Could Give a Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity.I'm
Not A
Victim'
Rush Limbaugh has smeared Michael J. Fox, claiming that he exaggerated
the
symptoms of his Parkinson's disease in an ad supporting embryonic stem
cell
research. (He also mocked Fox by impersonating tremors associated with
the
disease on air.) In an effort to deflect criticism, Limbaugh told
Katie
Couric the following: "I believe Democrats have a long history of
using
victims of various things as political spokespeople because they
believe
they are untouchable, infallible, they are immune from criticism."
Last night on CBS, Fox fired back, telling Couric, "I could give a
damn
about Rush Limbaugh's pity or anyone else's pity. I'm not a victim."
Transcript:
COURIC: I called Rush Limbaugh and he told me: I believe Democrats
have
a
long history of using victims of various things as political
spokespeople
because they believe they are untouchable, infallible, they are immune
from
criticism.
FOX: Well, first thing, he used the word victim. And on another
occasion I
heard him use the word pitiable. And understand, nobody in this
position
wants pity. We don't want pity. I could give a damn about Rush
Limbaugh's
pity or anyone else's pity. I'm not a victim. I'm someone who is in
this
situation. I think I'm in this situation along with millions of other
Americans, and we have a right, if there's answers out there, to
pursue
those answers with the full support of our politicians. And so I don't
need
anyone's permission to do that.
COURIC: You have said before this is a bipartisan problem that
requires
a
bipartisan solution.
FOX: No, disease is a nonpartisan problem that requires a bipartisan
solution.
COURIC: Would you support a Republican candidate?
FOX: I have. Arlen Specter is my guy. I have campaigned for Arlen
Specter.
He has been a fantastic champion of stem cell research. In the
meantime,
separate and apart from my political involvement, I've started a
foundation
that has raised $85 million for research and is the second leading
funder
of
Parkinson's research after the federal government.
And, you know, it's not - I'm not a Johnny-come-lately. Nobody
plucked
me
off the apple cart to come and do this. I mean, I believe in this
cause.
I
put a lot of my life and energy into it, and I'm serious about it.
From Think Progress
Michael Fox is a class guy. Limbaugh is a gross obscene drug addicted
wind bag.
I'm hoping he loses some of his audience due to this,
but I doubt it. Anyone who's stuck with Limbaugh
this long is probably a hopeless case.
I don't understand how anyone can stand him. He's entitled to his
opinions, but he is also obnoxious, rude, and disgusting. He appeals to
the lowest common denominator. That O'Reilly character is another one.
I LOVE the way Keith Olberman goes after O'Reilly.
And, O'Reilly deserves every bit of it. He really is
obnoxious. The Worst Person In The World! Well,
for a couple funny minutes, anyway.
Have you seen the DVD '"Outfoxed"? It shows how big a jerk O'Really can
be. Olbermann is right on.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
30 Oct 2006 06:11:55 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 22:48:11 -0700, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
In article <qpydnblugs26m97YnZ2dnUVZ_uqdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-6A1B71.23355427102006@news.giganews.com...
In article <9tCdncja0c77P9_YnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
Michael J. Fox: 'I Could Give a Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity.I'm Not A
Victim'
Rush Limbaugh has smeared Michael J. Fox, claiming that he exaggerated
the
symptoms of his Parkinson's disease in an ad supporting embryonic stem
cell
research. (He also mocked Fox by impersonating tremors associated with
the
disease on air.) In an effort to deflect criticism, Limbaugh told Katie
Couric the following: "I believe Democrats have a long history of using
victims of various things as political spokespeople because they believe
they are untouchable, infallible, they are immune from criticism."
Last night on CBS, Fox fired back, telling Couric, "I could give a damn
about Rush Limbaugh's pity or anyone else's pity. I'm not a victim."
Transcript:
COURIC: I called Rush Limbaugh and he told me: I believe Democrats have
a
long history of using victims of various things as political spokespeople
because they believe they are untouchable, infallible, they are immune
from
criticism.
FOX: Well, first thing, he used the word victim. And on another
occasion I
heard him use the word pitiable. And understand, nobody in this position
wants pity. We don't want pity. I could give a damn about Rush Limbaugh's
pity or anyone else's pity. I'm not a victim. I'm someone who is in this
situation. I think I'm in this situation along with millions of other
Americans, and we have a right, if there's answers out there, to pursue
those answers with the full support of our politicians. And so I don't
need
anyone's permission to do that.
COURIC: You have said before this is a bipartisan problem that requires
a
bipartisan solution.
FOX: No, disease is a nonpartisan problem that requires a bipartisan
solution.
COURIC: Would you support a Republican candidate?
FOX: I have. Arlen Specter is my guy. I have campaigned for Arlen
Specter.
He has been a fantastic champion of stem cell research. In the meantime,
separate and apart from my political involvement, I've started a
foundation
that has raised $85 million for research and is the second leading funder
of
Parkinson's research after the federal government.
And, you know, it's not - I'm not a Johnny-come-lately. Nobody plucked
me
off the apple cart to come and do this. I mean, I believe in this cause.
I
put a lot of my life and energy into it, and I'm serious about it.
From Think Progress
Michael Fox is a class guy. Limbaugh is a gross obscene drug addicted
wind bag.
I'm hoping he loses some of his audience due to this,
but I doubt it. Anyone who's stuck with Limbaugh
this long is probably a hopeless case.
I don't understand how anyone can stand him. He's entitled to his
opinions, but he is also obnoxious, rude, and disgusting. He appeals to
the lowest common denominator. That O'Reilly character is another one.
So is Shrub and the Rethugnicans.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
29 Oct 2006 03:58:21 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 22:48:11 -0700, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
I don't understand how anyone can stand him. He's entitled to his
opinions, but he is also obnoxious, rude, and disgusting. He appeals to
the lowest common denominator. That O'Reilly character is another one.
And their audience is the lowest common denominator. Unfortunately
having a working brain cell is not a voting requirement. If it were,
the number of people voting in the last few national elections would
have been more than the number who were qualified to vote.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
I cannot conceive of a god who rewards and punishes his creatures
or has a will of the kind that we experience in ourselves. Neither
can I nor would I want to conceive of an individual that survives
its physical death; let feeble souls, from fear or absurd egotism,
cherish such thoughts. I am satisfied with the mystery of the eter-
nity of life and a glimpse of the marvelous structure of the exist-
ing world, together with the devoted striving to comprehend a
portion, be it ever so tiny, of the Reason that manifests itself in
nature.
- Albert Einstein, as quoted in _Billions and Billions_, Carl Sagan.
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
29 Oct 2006 11:57:26 PM |
|
|
In article <amu8k21336vhv5kg5jtuppbmd0g8tta13j@4ax.com>,
Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote:
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 22:48:11 -0700, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
I don't understand how anyone can stand him. He's entitled to his
opinions, but he is also obnoxious, rude, and disgusting. He appeals to
the lowest common denominator. That O'Reilly character is another one.
And their audience is the lowest common denominator. Unfortunately
having a working brain cell is not a voting requirement. If it were,
the number of people voting in the last few national elections would
have been more than the number who were qualified to vote.
That is true. I wonder how many knew anything at all about the people
they were voting for. Most probably never get beyond the crappy TV
attack ads. Others vote for all the guys with a D after their names, or
all with an R after their names just because that's the way they've
always voted.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
30 Oct 2006 09:32:22 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 21:57:26 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
In article <amu8k21336vhv5kg5jtuppbmd0g8tta13j@4ax.com>,
Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote:
And their audience is the lowest common denominator. Unfortunately
having a working brain cell is not a voting requirement. If it were,
the number of people voting in the last few national elections would
have been more than the number who were qualified to vote.
That is true. I wonder how many knew anything at all about the people
they were voting for.
I just heard an interview this morning. The voter isn't voting for the
candidate because she doesn't like what his family looks like. And
this is the kind of thinking that determines the fate of half a
million Iraqis.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"Properly read, the Bible is the most potent force for atheism ever conceived."
- Isaac Asimov
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
This signature was made by SigChanger.
You can find SigChanger at: http://www.phranc.nl/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Startlemyerfieldson" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
30 Oct 2006 09:46:28 AM |
|
|
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:2l6ck21pl4o9tcaaahjk66ut28dv7814og@4ax.com...
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 21:57:26 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
In article <amu8k21336vhv5kg5jtuppbmd0g8tta13j@4ax.com>,
Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote:
And their audience is the lowest common denominator. Unfortunately
having a working brain cell is not a voting requirement. If it
were,
the number of people voting in the last few national elections would
have been more than the number who were qualified to vote.
That is true. I wonder how many knew anything at all about the people
they were voting for.
I just heard an interview this morning. The voter isn't voting for the
candidate because she doesn't like what his family looks like. And
this is the kind of thinking that determines the fate of half a
million Iraqis.
--
My girlfriend, in 2000, voted for Gore because she thought Bush was
ugly. No other reason.
Maybe that kind of voting creates some kind of self-cancellation.
Her vote cancelled by some old lady who thought George Bushes wife
looked better than Tipper... Who knows....
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
30 Oct 2006 02:00:45 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 09:46:28 -0600, "Startlemyerfieldson"
<Bing@budda.com> wrote:
I just heard an interview this morning. The voter isn't voting for the
candidate because she doesn't like what his family looks like. And
this is the kind of thinking that determines the fate of half a
million Iraqis.
My girlfriend, in 2000, voted for Gore because she thought Bush was
ugly. No other reason.
Maybe that kind of voting creates some kind of self-cancellation.
Her vote cancelled by some old lady who thought George Bushes wife
looked better than Tipper... Who knows....
How many women voted for JFK because RMN didn't look good on camera?
There were calls to repeal suffrage or restrict debates to radio when
that got out.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
The most curious social convention of the great age in which we live is the
one to the effect that religious opinions should be respected.
-- H. L. Mencken
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
This signature was made by SigChanger.
You can find SigChanger at: http://www.phranc.nl/
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
31 Oct 2006 12:44:57 AM |
|
|
In article <1dmck258ciovtjevugms6oes99i3olko1q@4ax.com>,
Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 09:46:28 -0600, "Startlemyerfieldson"
<Bing@budda.com> wrote:
I just heard an interview this morning. The voter isn't voting for the
candidate because she doesn't like what his family looks like. And
this is the kind of thinking that determines the fate of half a
million Iraqis.
My girlfriend, in 2000, voted for Gore because she thought Bush was
ugly. No other reason.
Maybe that kind of voting creates some kind of self-cancellation.
Her vote cancelled by some old lady who thought George Bushes wife
looked better than Tipper... Who knows....
How many women voted for JFK because RMN didn't look good on camera?
And that 5 o'clock shadow.
There were calls to repeal suffrage or restrict debates to radio when
that got out.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
31 Oct 2006 12:43:47 AM |
|
|
In article <2l6ck21pl4o9tcaaahjk66ut28dv7814og@4ax.com>,
Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote:
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 21:57:26 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
In article <amu8k21336vhv5kg5jtuppbmd0g8tta13j@4ax.com>,
Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote:
And their audience is the lowest common denominator. Unfortunately
having a working brain cell is not a voting requirement. If it were,
the number of people voting in the last few national elections would
have been more than the number who were qualified to vote.
That is true. I wonder how many knew anything at all about the people
they were voting for.
I just heard an interview this morning. The voter isn't voting for the
candidate because she doesn't like what his family looks like. And
this is the kind of thinking that determines the fate of half a
million Iraqis.
Argh! Sad but true. I've heard people say that they were going to vote
for a candidate because he looked more 'sincere' than his opponent.
Bleah!
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tak a#344" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
09 Nov 2006 09:56:06 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 22:43:47 -0800, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
on Iraqis.
Argh! Sad but true. I've heard people say that they were going to vote
for a candidate because he looked more 'sincere' than his opponent.
Bleah!
I heard that. and I kept trying to explain that looking stupid and
looking sincere are not the same thing.
People telling me that monkey boy looked more sincere than the DEM. A
blank look if stupidity is apparently trustworthy.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ben Kaufman" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael J. Fox: "I Could Give A Damn About Rush Limbaugh's Pity... I'm Not A Victim." |
29 Oct 2006 06:39:26 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 04:58:21 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote:
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 22:48:11 -0700, johac <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com>
wrote:
I don't understand how anyone can stand him. He's entitled to his
opinions, but he is also obnoxious, rude, and disgusting. He appeals to
the lowest common denominator. That O'Reilly character is another one.
And their audience is the lowest common denominator. Unfortunately
having a working brain cell is not a voting requirement. If it were,
the number of people voting in the last few national elections would
have been more than the number who were qualified to vote.
Since when is divide by zero error the LCD? :-)
Ben
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
Re: There is only two Koi Los and one is Roy Hauer. Roy does not have to morph to impersonate victim, he's using Hipcrime!
Re: There is only two Koi Los and one is Roy Hauer. Roy does not have to morph to impersonate victim, he's using Hipcrime!
Re: Sina's Challenge - WE WILL REMOVE THIS SITE IF PROVEN WRONG- If you do not like this site and want me to remove it, instead of actingas a bully or as a victim, disprove my charges against Muhammad logically.Not only will I remove the site, I w
Scientology not a religion, victim testified
The Bible was not written for all men, for all ages, for all time
Defending nature is not anti-science
I kid you not - Jack Paar dies at 85
Re: 6/2 JC was NOT the messiah!
| JOHN KERRY IS NOT A WAR HERO! JOHN KERRY HATES AMERICA.
OT: Group Urges Voters Not to Choose Bush
OT: Americans return to Paris, but not Provence, as terror fatigue takes hold
Re : : You might not want to answer the door
Re: The god of atheisst definition doesn't exist - NOT "OMNI"
HUMANISATION IS NOT HUMANISM
OT: Make Love, Not War!
|
|
|
