Religions > Atheism > Michael Moore is NO all-American. He's all anti-American!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Liberals Are Numb-Nuts" |
| Date: |
13 Aug 2004 03:11:06 AM |
| Object: |
Michael Moore is NO all-American. He's all anti-American!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Michael Moore is NO all-American. He's all
anti-American!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
the appeal of michael moore's public image relies on its blend of
rosanne barr, rosie o donnell, and steve dahl(of chicago shock radio
fame). he uses vulgarism of pop culture to invade the homes of
ordinary americans. but what he's really trying to pass is undiluted
anticapitalism and anti-americanism. if you think moore loves america,
think again. he's a clever leftist who, instead of burning the
american flag, wraps himself in old glory and soaks it with sweat and
*****. moore is the sort of pathological leftwing scum who bakes you
an apple pie stuffed with marxist arsenic. he plays the regular joe
unlike most haughty intellectual leftists or flaky granola goons
who've defined the image of the left. moore says he's one of us, but
his agenda is feeding us marxism and antiamericanism. for moore,
american capitalism is neo-imperialism. the notion that moore is with
working class americans against rich americans is essentially false.
moore is against american civilization. he thinks rich are robbers
and thieves but he also thinks ALL white people--except leftists
baptized of their guilt thru self-loathing--are guntoting, crazy
lunatics. moore's take on american history is that all white americans
have been slave-owners, genocidal freaks, and proto-nazis. for the
time being, he pretends sympathy with the working class whites against
rich people, but his agenda is much bigger. moore is not even a
liberal democrat. he's a marxist allied with the liberals to attack
the conservatives. scum like moore have plans to destroy the liberals
once the conservatives have knocked off. moore's ideological
compatriots write for The Nation, the socialist rag. the Nation favors
the democrats over the republicans as a tactic but at the core, favors
socialism over liberal capitalism. leftists are using 'Popular Front'
tactics to plant the seeds of discord and hatred and gain power. then,
like radical leftists throughout history, they'll turn on the
liberals. leftists' mistake in the past was turning on their liberal
allies before conservatives had been totally defeated. leftists,
after losing the cold war, have
decided for a more gradual approach. unite with liberals to destroy
the conservatives. then get the liberals.
the reason why non-radical liberals are easy prey to leftism is the
guilt-factor. liberals in their good intentions are helpless and
spineless against those who constantly holler and scream about
injustice and need for drastic change. moore and the folks at the
Nation are biding their time, but we must remember that moore is not
a liberal nor an ordinary american. don't be fooled by his superficial
baseball cap donning, frumpy garbed schtick. moore, like all leftists,
wants to destroy american capitalism. if you want proof, just read
the Nation. Nation writers are as vitrolic against liberals as
against the conservatives. Nation was even more harshly critical of
clinton than the National Review. Nation considered clinton just a
milder capitalist imperialist. they think the same way about gore and
kerry. Nation has been vicious against ted kennedy and jimmy carter.
the heroes of the nation are the likes of karl marx, leon trotsky,
rosa luxembourg, gramsci, chomsky, kunstler, and dubois who heartily
congratulated mao zedong during the late 50s when 30 million chinese
were perishing from communist famine. writing for the Nation are scum
like sydney schanberg who risked the life of a cambodian interpreter
just to win journalistic glory. there he is again, trying to
undermine our war in iraq as he did everything in his power to
undermine the US backed government in cambodia and open phnem penh's
doors to the leftwing khmer rouge. these are moore's real friends.
moore pretends to befriend liberals, and liberals, with their
spineless guilt and in order to take the white house, have decided to
embrace the hateful, vicious, and treasonous leftist michael moore.
liberals have put their arms around a man who thinks US is the
greatest evil in the world, that US corporations suck the world dry,
and that businessmen are scum. for moore, the only good business is
one that destorys business. moore makes millions selling his hate
movies to destroy the the golden goose of american capitalism, the
most dynamic and productive force in history and the world. The
moronic liberals are happily giving moore all the rope the left needs
to undermine american values, american system, and american heritage.
moore is a hangman for the left. his uses reels of film as the noose.
moore uses his camera like an assassin. indeed, he's travis bickle
with a movie camera. he's a stupid leftwing loser who wouldn't have
amounted to anything in life if not for absorbing all the dumb antics
of national lampoon, shock radio, and SNL and applying them to the
complex realm of politics to shape the world into a michael moore
show. moore is a degenerate megalomaniac whose sickness is hid behind
his disarming average joe schtick. already, moore has won over
converts among the liberals. roger ebert
says on his show that he agrees with moore that our president is a war
criminal, that bush murderously and callously sacrificed the lives of
young americans and iraqi women and children just to fatten his
wallet. that is the main and crucial argument of the movie and ebert
flat out says he agrees. of course, one could argue that ebert is
cynically playing professional politics because most of his cronies
are leftists. but, over the years, one gets the sense that ebert is
really a deranged anti-american *****, a hater. it's one thing for
ebert to say he disagrees with the bush doctrine or that the GOP
economic plan isn't good for the nation. but, when we have a
mainstream critic abandoning his critical faculties and wholeheartedly
swallowing and pushing the paranoid lunacy of a marxist lunatic to the
american populace, we can only conclude ebert is just a michael moore
among film critics. he plays the all-american critic but his only
interest in cinema is its propaganda potential to ***** on america.
the job of a critic is to criticize. a critic may condemn or praise
but he must interpret, investigate, and analyze. anyone can dislike or
like a movie and state his opinion; what sets the critic apart is his
critical acumen and faculty. he has to examine not only whether he
likes or dislikes a movie but WHY; a critic must also be introspective
and question his own biases and criteria. instead of merely agreeing
or disagreeing with the agenda, he must also examine the tools of
exposition, whether the tools are honest or dishonest, whether the
methods are sound or unsound. never mind moore's views; clearly,
moore's tactics are unsound, manipulative, demagogic, vicious, and
murderous. but, the only thing ebert cares about is getting bush out
of the white house. ebert is willing to sell his critical soul to the
devil to just sway some misinformed impressionable undecided voters.
that's it. now, it's true that too many americans are misinformed
about political and economic affairs(not least because they spend too
much time watching movies and tv shows!), but what kind of remedy is
it to push demagoguery on the uninformed public? the only difference
between moore/ebert and hitler/goebbels is their politics. they
believe in the same means. the method is to reach out to the most
uninformed and impressionable masses and feed them simple outrageous
lies. it's like spreading literacy among the illiterate with mein
kampf or das kapital. in the name of spreading awareness, moore and
ebert are really interested in spreading antiamerian politics. people
like
ebert and moore do not encourage political interest in the long run
but only simpleminded bigotry and hatred and disillusionment to gain
power for their side. does anyone really think the people who have
fallen under the sway of farrakhan, jesse jackson, rush limbaugh, and
michael moore are encouraged to investigate further and take a
sophisticated look at the complex world? these demagogues are poor
role models; they present the world as a simple cartoon of simple
rights and wrongs, and of crazy paranoid fantasies. the idea that this
putrid and hateful propaganda is a documentary does grave injustice to
films like sorrow and the pity and frontline documentaries on PBS.
movies like fahrenheit 911 merely encourages arrogance and contempt
among the left and spreads only bloodthirst among the uninformed and
impressionable. moore has made a movie that inspires lynchmob
passions. he's saying our president is a criminal who deserves to be
lynched. of course, moore doesn't explicitly says bush should be
killed but his argument is bush is DESERVING of being killed. this is
the implicit message throughout the movie, and the crazed audiences
howling with bloodthirst are salivating with the neanderthal thuggery
of KKK thugs.
ebert says that anything that stirs up debate is good and welcome, no
matter how extreme or outrageous. but, of course ebert is just a big
fat stupid ugly liar. would ebert welcome neo-nazi movies about the
evil of world jewry just because it might get more people interested
in economic affairs? why is ebert so critical of birth of the nation?
didn't it stir up debate on race? ebert's argument is untenable and
he's a rank hypocrite. what he means is ONLY extreme leftism is
welcome.
---------
Liberals Hate America!
.
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
