| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
27 Aug 2007 09:35:26 PM |
| Object: |
Michael Vick and George Tiller |
There is something seriously wrong with this picture.
http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,22320842-5006003,00.html
Michael Vick guilty of illegal dogfighting
DISGRACED grid-iron star Michael Vick has pleaded guilty to federal
dogfighting charges and apologised publicly for his involvement in running
the illegal ring and endorsing the killing of dogs.
The suspended Atlanta Falcons quarterback yesterday took full responsibility
for his actions and said he was ashamed for disappointing his fans and
teammates.
District judge Henry Hudson repeatedly reminded the star player that he was
not bound by the prison sentence of 12 to 18 months that prosecutors and
Vick's attorneys are recommending.
"The bottom line is that if I decide you deserve five years and give you
five years, you can't appeal it," Hudson said.
"You're taking your chances here.
"You have to live with whatever decision I make."
http://www.kansascity.com/news/breaking_news/story/240929.html
New judge appointed in Tiller case
District Judge Clark V. Owens has been appointed to oversee a case
prosecuting Wichita abortion provider George Tiller.
Owens, who was selected by Chief Judge Michael Corrigan, replaces Judge
Anthony Powell.
Powell recused himself from the case Friday after news media coverage of
statements he made about Tiller nine years ago as a member of the Kansas
Legislature.
Tiller is charged with 19 misdemeanor counts of violating a section of the
state's abortion law that requires a second, independent doctor's opinion
before late-term abortions can be performed.
The attorney general's office alleges that Tiller had an unacceptable
financial tie to Ann Kristin Neuhaus, the doctor who provided the required
consultations for Tiller's patients.
--
J Young
younginsights@aol.com
.
|
|
| User: "Spartakus" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael Vick and George Tiller |
27 Aug 2007 10:41:26 PM |
|
|
"J Young" <younginsig...@aol.com> wrote:
There is something seriously wrong with this picture.
I'll say. Who but a nanocerebric fuckwit like you would try to convey
the horror of dogfighting by comparing it to abortion?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brian E. Clark" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael Vick and George Tiller |
28 Aug 2007 02:19:25 PM |
|
|
In article <1188272486.931016.117990
@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, Spartakus said...
I'll say. Who but a nanocerebric fuckwit like you
would try to convey the horror of dogfighting by
comparing it to abortion?
At first I misread "nanocerebric" as
"nonacerebric". I had no idea what the insult
"nine-brained" was supposed to convey. ;-)
--
-----------
Brian E. Clark
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sanitys Little Helper" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael Vick and George Tiller |
28 Aug 2007 06:35:43 AM |
|
|
Spartakus <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote in news:1188272486.931016.117990
@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com to alt.atheism:
nanocerebric
I like that word! Very apt in iBen's case.
--
David Silverman C.B.E.
aa #2208
"*****! I used up my last non-sequitur" - Andrew B Chung
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael Vick and George Tiller |
28 Aug 2007 01:30:24 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:35:43 +0200 (CEST), "Sanity's Little Helper"
<elvish@noshpam.org> wrote:
Spartakus <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote in news:1188272486.931016.117990
@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com to alt.atheism:
nanocerebric
I like that word! Very apt in iBen's case.
But many orders of magnitude too large.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "LC" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael Vick and George Tiller |
28 Aug 2007 08:43:35 AM |
|
|
A troll with numerous things seriously wrong, "J Young"
<younginsights@aol.com> wrote in message
news:fb01qn01fmm@news5.newsguy.com...
There is something seriously wrong with this picture.
Indeed.
Only a untreated schizophrenic like yourself would attempt to tie these
disparate stories together.
"why is it that most people who are against abortion are people who you
wouldn't want to ***** in the first place?
From: (Jon Young), celibate by other's choice.
Message-ID: <567f3dc3.0310171847.7e13d84@posting.google.com>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael Vick and George Tiller |
28 Aug 2007 12:46:54 AM |
|
|
J Young <younginsights@aol.com> wrote:
There is something seriously wrong with this picture.
Yep. You're in it, nazi turd.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael Vick and George Tiller |
28 Aug 2007 12:46:47 AM |
|
|
On 28 ao=FBt, 04:35, "J Young" <younginsig...@aol.com> wrote:
There is something seriously wrong with this picture.
http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,22320842-5006003,...
Michael Vick guilty of illegal dogfighting
Is there any reason at all why you're posting all this nonsense to
alt.abortion or alt.atheism? Are you that lonely that the only way you
can have small talk conversations is by sending this to total
strangers who despise you?
Have you any idea how pathetic you are, J Young?
.
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael Vick and George Tiller |
28 Aug 2007 11:55:32 PM |
|
|
<parsifal50@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1188280007.929759.110310@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
On 28 août, 04:35, "J Young" <younginsig...@aol.com> wrote:
There is something seriously wrong with this picture.
http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,22320842-5006003,...
Michael Vick guilty of illegal dogfighting
Is there any reason at all why you're posting all this nonsense to
alt.abortion or alt.atheism? Are you that lonely that the only way you
can have small talk conversations is by sending this to total
strangers who despise you?
Have you any idea how pathetic you are, J Young?
I can't believe that you're really that stupid that you would ask why is a
post about George Tiller "the Baby Killer" being sent to alt.abortion. As
far as alt.atheism; the *real* atheists in the group that have earned a
reputation of respect all say that alt.atheism is for subjects of interest
to atheists, not just subjects about atheism. Your input, being the peon
that you are, doesn't count.
.
|
|
|
| User: "LC" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael Vick and George Tiller |
29 Aug 2007 04:44:11 PM |
|
|
Certifiable netloon "J Young" <younginsights@aol.com> wrote in message
news:fb2ude01g9n@news2.newsguy.com...
<parsifal50@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1188280007.929759.110310@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
On 28 août, 04:35, "J Young" <younginsig...@aol.com> wrote:
There is something seriously wrong with this picture.
http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,22320842-5006003,...
Michael Vick guilty of illegal dogfighting
Is there any reason at all why you're posting all this nonsense to
alt.abortion or alt.atheism? Are you that lonely that the only way you
can have small talk conversations is by sending this to total
strangers who despise you?
Have you any idea how pathetic you are, J Young?
I can't believe that you're really that stupid that you would ask why is a
post about George Tiller "the Baby Killer" being sent to alt.abortion.
Easy: Because you're a obsessed nutcase troll.
As far as alt.atheism; the *real* atheists in the group that have earned a
reputation of respect all say that alt.atheism is for subjects of interest
to atheists, not just subjects about atheism.
Gee, that's kind of what you said when your were sockpuppeting as "Wilson":
"I've noticed that many of the topics listed really have little
or nothing to do with atheism at all and would like to know what subjects
and are not appropriate? I enjoy discussing a wide range of political and
social issues"
From: "Wilson" <wilson@universal.com>, RIP
Newsgroups: alt.atheism
Subject: An introduction
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:43:03 -0400
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028
Message-ID: <468099c2$0$3957$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com>
Your input, being the peon that you are, doesn't count.
Got irony, "Wilson"?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael Vick and George Tiller |
28 Aug 2007 05:27:40 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 22:35:26 -0400, "J Young" <younginsights@aol.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id <fb01qn01fmm@news5.newsguy.com> wrote:
http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,22320842-5006003,00.html
Michael Vick guilty of illegal dogfighting
DISGRACED grid-iron star Michael Vick has pleaded guilty to federal
dogfighting charges and apologised publicly for his involvement in running
the illegal ring and endorsing the killing of dogs.
He got caught and it is going to cost him millions. For the kind of
money potentially involved here there is nothing he would not do or
say to protect himself.
There is no reason to believe a word he says.
He is guilty of one of the most reprehensible acts imaginable, and it
appears there is a sub-culture of cretins that enjoy this. A message
should be sent to all of them this will not be tolerated.
For the first time in my life I wish I was a sports fan so my not
being a sports fan would actually have some meaning but I have no
support to withdraw and I regret it.
The suspended Atlanta Falcons quarterback yesterday took full responsibility
for his actions and said he was ashamed for disappointing his fans and
teammates.
I bet his bank account was not far from his mind.
District judge Henry Hudson repeatedly reminded the star player that he was
not bound by the prison sentence of 12 to 18 months that prosecutors and
Vick's attorneys are recommending.
"The bottom line is that if I decide you deserve five years and give you
five years, you can't appeal it," Hudson said.
Go for it.
"You're taking your chances here.
"You have to live with whatever decision I make."
--
Pro-Choice is Pro-Freedom
Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification, not work permit or citizenship.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Matt Silberstein" |
|
| Title: Re: Michael Vick and George Tiller |
28 Aug 2007 09:10:25 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 22:35:26 -0400, in alt.atheism , "J Young"
<younginsights@aol.com> in <fb01qn01fmm@news5.newsguy.com> wrote:
There is something seriously wrong with this picture.
What is wrong? In the first case the judge explained the situation
regarding the case before him, in the second case the judge had
already commented on the people involved before he had the case. The
first judge did exactly what a judge is suppose to do, the second
judge, if he had any reasonable judicial ethics, should have recused
himself immediately.
http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,22320842-5006003,00.html
[snip]
http://www.kansascity.com/news/breaking_news/story/240929.html
[snip]
--
Matt Silberstein
Do something today about the Darfur Genocide
http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org
"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
