| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
09 Aug 2005 02:59:47 AM |
| Object: |
Militant Atheism And 'Nonpersons' As Natural Resources |
Militant Atheism And 'Nonpersons' As Natural Resources
Sierra Times
Apr. 3, 2005
Linda Kimball
In "Mere Christianity," CS Lewis described how he came to believe in
the God of the Bible by virtue of reason. Over a period of years, Lewis
examined evidence for God and concluded that it simply made sense to
believe in His existence. Thus it was neither emotion nor superstition
that led him to God, but reason and logic. In other words, his faith in
God was arrived at by virtue of how much sense it all made to him.
Christianity answered all of his questions, such as why we're here, our
purpose in life, what's wrong with this world, and where we go after we
leave this life.
As he looked back upon his former 'unbelief,' he realized that it had
been the result of pride, emotions, and imagination, and that it had
nothing to do with reason and logic after all. He concluded that: "The
battle is between faith and reason on one side and emotion and
imagination on the other."
It's precisely these things: virulent hatred of God and
Judao-Christianity, pride (towering self-conceit), out-of-control
emotions, imagination (wishful thinking), and the seductive allure of a
particular 'idea' that are the common denominators running beneath and
through America's Left. As a force united, they birthed an unholy army
of mankind-hating demoniacs armed with 'will to power' who have
unleashed a Hellish maelstrom of madness, hatred, and destruction upon
America.
Out of this seething pustule of poison emerged a two-headed hydra: a
mankind despising coalition of Mengeles-type 'gods' who call themselves
secular human bio-ethicists and animal rights activists.These haters of
mankind envision a utopianist 'garden of eden' world that doesn't
include most of 'us,' the ones they refer to so disparagingly as
'nonpersons."
These self ordained human 'gods' are adherents to Nietzsche's blood
soaked nightmarish philosophy wherein he had declared...(quote)"God
(is) dead......How shall we, the murderers of all murderers comfort
ourselves? Must not we ourselves become gods to seem worthy of
it?....the heroic individualist is no longer bound to a traditional
'slave morality," but is creating his own rules." (end quote)
What was it that led to Nietzsche's triumphant declaration? It was a
provocatively seductive 'idea.' That idea was Darwin's theory of
evolution, which became the depraved growth medium from which grew a
new and militant atheism that devalued all values and degraded mankind
to being nothing more than an accidental collision between
nonintelligence-bearing matter. Thus mankind became, in the minds of
madmen, something lower and baser than beasts. No longer must these
'beasts' be seen as having any intrinsic worth.
Human worth or lack of it, could now be determined by mankind's new
slavemaster 'human gods." And because Darwin's "idea" had given them
the green light to rid the human species of 'useless eaters' and other
'undesirables,' militant atheists embarked upon a bloodbath unlike
anything ever before witnessed in this world. In their power-crazed
bloodlust they have thus far exterminated over one hundred million
human beings. And they are not done yet.
The ability to possess this aberrant power was what Nietzsche referred
to when he jubilantly declared himself to be free from God's 'slave
morality, which was his way of saying "sanctity of life," and God's
other moral laws. Nietzsche himself predicted the outcome of his
atheism on the world: (quote) "I am not a man, I am dynamite.....my
truth is fearful; it is in the past we called lies the truth. The
concept of politics is completely taken up in a war of the spirits, all
the structures of power are blown up...for they are based on the lie.
There will be wars of a kind that have never happened on the earth."
(end quote)
Nietzsche was proclaiming that with God dead, not only did human life
no longer have meaning, purpose, or value but neither did the
Christian-Judao principles on which Western civilization had been built
Christian-Judao moral principles and God's laws are the things he
called 'lies.' Hence his 'devaluation of all values' declaration, which
means in context, that all distinctions between right and wrong and
justice and injustice are dead. No longer does there exist any
objective standards. All that exists is the 'will to power" ruthlessly
wielded by selfworshipping megalomaniacs who see themselves as being
the world's 'philosopher kings" and 'gods" while simultaneously, the
rest of mankind becomes reduced to being putty in the hands of these
sadistic monsters.
This brings us to America's secular human bio-ethicists and animal
rights activists who believe they are genetically superior to the rest
of us. Thus, to their arrogant minds, it's only fitting that they have
the power to determine who is a 'person' and who is not. This
determination is made according to their own 'moral laws,' which are as
changeable as their feelings.
One thing both secular human bio-ethicists and their animal rights
cohorts are in agreement on is that simply by being a member of the
human species, the human animal is not automatically accorded intrinsic
worth. Hence it makes a twisted sort of sense that they are debating
the merits of conferring 'personhood' on animals, whom they in their
demented minds, refer to as 'nonhuman' persons.
Mankind's new 'gods' have also agreed to reject 'person' status for the
unborn, newborns, people with dementia, the severely brain damaged, and
any who do not measure up to their 'moral' standards. They believe the
human creature must earn its moral and legal rights by displaying
certain cognitive capacities.
Yet another proposal being discussed is whether to use cognitively
disabled people as a source for organ harvesting. The terminology used
in referrence to the mentally impaired was "natural resource." But why
stop with organs? If these 'nonpersons" can be viewed as 'natural
resources" for the harvesting of organs, then why not for eyes, blood,
and skin as well? If they are no longer human and not deserving of
life, then why not strip their bodies of parts just as junker cars are
stripped of theirs ?
John Harris, the Sir David Alliance professor of bioethics at the
University of Manchester, England, stated: "it is necessary to
establish criteria for personhood so as to identify those sorts of
individuals who have the highest moral value......(it should be a) life
of such quality as to bring individuals into the same moral categories
as ourselves.....exploration of who is a person must include
animals.... " Tom L. Beauchamp, co-author of one of the most
influential bioethics textbooks, "Principles Of Biomedical Ethics,"
declared: "it is safe to assume that a creature is a moral person
if....(1) it is capable of making moral judgements about rightness and
wrongness of actions, (2) it has motives that can be judged morally."
Bear in mind that these conceited 'gods' are speaking of us as
'creatures' and 'its' and that the moral values they refer to are of
their own devising. It's obvious that they're speaking of creating a
'superior race.' Those of us not deemed 'moral' will either be humanely
starved, used as 'parts' factories, or perhaps we will serve as slaves
in their much fantasized about paradise?
From "Roots Of Human Resistance To Animal Rights: Psychological And
Conceptual Blocks," Steven J. Bartlett, 2002, we have this exalted
'wisdom:' "Throughout.....history, nonhuman animals have had no rights.
Scholars have distinguished two....reasons for this.....both are
homocentric. One has a theological basis, the other is a secular
expression of species pride." Mankind's 'sin,' according to these
insane 'gods' is homocentrism, born out of 'specieism' and of belief in
that despotic anthropological God of the Bible who placed the human
species above all other species.
The 'sin' of homocentrism is defined as "the exhaltation of the human
species by directing attention to uniquely human characteristics."
Homocentric 'nonpersons' are guilty of committing "human-level
narcissism,' 'genetic selfishness,' and 'conceptual pathology' as well
as being 'parasites' in relation to the world's ecosystems. How
hateful, unfair, and discriminatory is that, I ask you? We need to
repent and atone for our sins by allowing our 'betters' to humanely
euthanize us out of existence right away!
Among legal luminaries of the 'nonhuman animal persons' equality
movement are civil rights attorney Alan Dershowitz and Constitutional
law attorney, Lawrence Tribe, the guy who representeded Gore against
Bush in the 2000 election. Tribe believes that there should be no
"insistent reference to human interests," at the expense of "plant and
animal life and things of beauty." We need "biological modesty on the
part of man to acknowledge that his species has no intrinsically
superior value..."
Dershowitz, "Animal rights or animal legal courses.....(are) being
taught.....in something like 26 US law schools, and more being added
every year......we are also seeing chapters of animal rights law
in.....(some)state bar associations.....as well as......within the
American Bar Association..." (end quote)
Just as with Nietzsche, all of these atheist secular human 'gods' and
'philosopher kings' ground their mankind-hating reasoning in Darwinian
theory. To them, the difference between species is not one of distinct
categories, but simply one of degree. And there is absolutely nothing
in this degree of difference that justifies the human species as having
dominion over the other species, or over the earth. In other words:
"How dare homocentric 'nonintelligence-bearing matter" expect to have a
right to life?!?" Your life is no longer sacred. Your God is "dead" and
your 'new gods' do not give you an automatic right to life.
In the Hastings Center Report, 1993, Daniel Callahan, one of the
founding fathers of bioethics, made it ominously clear whose purpose
bioethicists serve "...the final factor of great importance in
bioethics success was the emergence, ideologically, of a form of
bioethics that dovetails nicely with the reigning political liberalism
of the educated classes in America." (end quote)
Just as the poison of socialism has managed to thoroughly infect
America from top-to-bottom, so too have these secular human Mengeles
infested America. They've become among society's most influential
members. They sit on federal and state public policy commissions; they
author health codes; condition the minds of America's next generation
of doctors, lawyers, business leaders, and govenment policy makers;
they are HMO consultants;they are employed as directors of nursing home
and hospital ethics committees where they decide matters such as when
to withhold treatment from premature babies, stroke patients, etc. They
are called upon to serve as expert witnesses; create the 'do's and
don'ts' of organ procurement, and serve as overseers of medical
experimentation on human beings.
Pinnelas County, where Terri Shiavo was "humanely starved' has a nest
of these vipers.
(quote) "......the essential vice, the utmost evil, is Pride....it was
through Pride that the devil became the devil: Pride leads to every
other vice; it is the complete anti-God state of mind." (end quote)
~~~~CS Lewis, "Mere Christianity"
Pride is a vice that afflicts everyone to some degree or another. But
in some people, pride is of such towering proportions that it manifests
itself in diabolical ways. And when someone's overblown conceit of
himself and his own ideas leads him to view his fellow man as though he
were nothing but, "its, creatures, nonpersons, and natural resources,"
then pride has demented his mind and become diabolical. Evil has taken
total possession of his mind and soul and he has become a danger to us
all.
So far they are treading lightly for fear of discovery. Despite their
dementia and the state of denial they wrap themselves in, they do know
how wicked their intentions towards us are which is why they are doing
their utmost to operate under the radar. Therefore, let us use the
power of the internet to expose them and their evil schemes to the
light of day. Inform everyone in your family and all who are your
friends. Spread the word far and wide. Truth and exposure to them is as
Black Flag is to filthy roaches.
Aleksandr Solszhenitsyn said of their kind: "They flee from Christ like
devils from the sign of the cross."
Sources: 1..Washington Area Secular Humanists (WASH)
2..Common Sense Americanism.....The Humanist Manifesto II
3..Michigan State Univ. College of Law: Animal Legal and Historical Web
Center, "Roots of Human Resistance To Animal Rights: Psychological and
Conceptual Blocks"
4..Association of American Medical Colleges Reporter: "Personhood'
Redefined: Animal Rights Strategy Gets At The Essence"
5..Hastings Center Report
http://www.sierratimes.com/05/04/03/209_240_205_63_97396.htm
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1376917/posts
.
|
|
| User: "turk" |
|
| Title: Re: Militant Atheism And 'Nonpersons' As Natural Resources |
09 Aug 2005 03:32:37 AM |
|
|
<wordsoftruth114@email.com> wrote in message
news:1123574387.535919.235400@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Militant Atheism And 'Nonpersons' As Natural Resources
Sierra Times
Apr. 3, 2005
Linda Kimball
In "Mere Christianity," CS Lewis described how he came to believe in
the God of the Bible by virtue of reason. Over a period of years, Lewis
examined evidence for God and concluded that it simply made sense to
believe in His existence. Thus it was neither emotion nor superstition
that led him to God, but reason and logic. In other words, his faith in
God was arrived at by virtue of how much sense it all made to him.
Christianity answered all of his questions, such as why we're here, our
purpose in life, what's wrong with this world, and where we go after we
leave this life.
As he looked back upon his former 'unbelief,' he realized that it had
been the result of pride, emotions, and imagination, and that it had
nothing to do with reason and logic after all. He concluded that: "The
battle is between faith and reason on one side and emotion and
imagination on the other."
C.S. Lewis was as pathetic an apologist as the Christian movement has ever
produced. And that's saying something. His "reasoning" (and I use that
word loosely) is not based on logic at all, but special pleading, appeals to
ignorance, and ad hominem attacks on non-belief.
Just for an example of his specious claims, his whole "Natural Law" of
morality thesis is flawed for the simple reason that these "moral laws" he
pretends exist are different from culture to culture. Not to mention, his
comparison of this "law" to the law of gravity is just beyond ridiculous.
Show me someone who can defy the law of gravity and I'll tell you his name
is Clark Kent.
Even granting him his arguments (although, only an idiot would do so) does
not at all lead to Lewis' intended conclusion: the existence of a higher
being. A better title for his book would be "Mere Assertions". He should
stick to children's books like his Narnia crap, even though they are just
transparent attempts at child prosthelyzing.
turk
--
My last vestige of "hands off religion" respect disappeared in the smoke and
choking dust of September 11th 2001, followed by the "National Day of
Prayer," when prelates and pastors did their tremulous Martin Luther King
impersonations and urged people of mutually incompatible faiths to hold
hands, united in homage to the very force that caused the problem in the
first place.
-- Richard Dawkins, The Devil's Chaplain (2004)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Katt" |
|
| Title: Re: Militant Atheism And 'Nonpersons' As Natural Resources |
09 Aug 2005 05:01:09 AM |
|
|
"turk" <turk96@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:0o6dneTWPtq792XfRVn-sQ@comcast.com...
<wordsoftruth114@email.com> wrote in message
C.S. Lewis was as pathetic an apologist as the Christian movement has ever
produced. And that's saying something. His "reasoning" (and I use that
word loosely) is not based on logic at all, but special pleading, appeals
to ignorance, and ad hominem attacks on non-belief.
Is the following (from wikipedia) an accurate summary of the kind of way he
worked...? Because if it is, 'pathetic' is truly the word!!
----------
"...one of Lewis's best-known arguments in favor of Christianity from his
book Mere Christianity.
"According to the argument, most people are willing to accept Jesus Christ
as a great moral teacher, but the Gospels record that Jesus made many claims
to divinity, either explicitly ("I and the Father are one") or implicitly,
by assuming authority only God had ("The Son of Man has power on earth to
forgive sins"). Assuming that the Gospels are accurate, Lewis said there are
three options:
1.. Jesus was telling falsehoods and knew it, and so he was a liar.
2.. Jesus was telling falsehoods but believed he was telling the truth,
and so he was insane.
3.. Jesus was telling the truth, and so he was divine.
"Thus, Lewis maintained that one cannot argue Jesus was merely a great moral
teacher because his moral teachings would be invalidated by virtue of either
his lying or his insanity. On the other hand, if he was divine, he must
clearly be more than merely a great moral teacher."
----------
Frankly, I'd have thought a child of 10 would have seen through *that*
piece of manipulative dishonesty...!
Katt
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cracklin" |
|
| Title: Re: Militant Atheism And 'Nonpersons' As Natural Resources |
09 Aug 2005 01:01:54 PM |
|
|
"Katt" <katt@office.commm> wrote in message
news:F9%Je.289$2C5.237@newsfe1-win.ntli.net...
2.. Jesus was telling falsehoods but believed he was telling the truth,
and so he was insane.
=============================
I disagree with this. Repeating something someone was told to be truth
doesn't make a person insane. It just makes them misinformed. And this
Jesus may never have existed for all we know.........
--
CR......
"I contend that we are both atheists, I just believe in one less god
than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all other possible gods,
then you
will know why I dismiss yours." -= Stephen F. Roberts =-
~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*
.
|
|
|
| User: "MarkA" |
|
| Title: Re: Militant Atheism And 'Nonpersons' As Natural Resources |
09 Aug 2005 04:28:34 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:01:54 -0500, Cracklin' wrote:
"Katt" <katt@office.commm> wrote in message
news:F9%Je.289$2C5.237@newsfe1-win.ntli.net...
2.. Jesus was telling falsehoods but believed he was telling the truth,
and so he was insane.
=============================
I disagree with this. Repeating something someone was told to be truth
doesn't make a person insane. It just makes them misinformed. And this
Jesus may never have existed for all we know.........
He could have been delusional. Of all the delusional Xtians in the world
(there's a LOT), he would have been #1! Kind of appropriate, eh?
--
MarkA
(still caught in the maze of twisty little passages, all different)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Baldin Pramer" |
|
| Title: Re: Militant Atheism And 'Nonpersons' As Natural Resources |
09 Aug 2005 10:15:59 AM |
|
|
Katt wrote:
"turk" <turk96@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:0o6dneTWPtq792XfRVn-sQ@comcast.com...
<wordsoftruth114@email.com> wrote in message
C.S. Lewis was as pathetic an apologist as the Christian movement has ever
produced. And that's saying something. His "reasoning" (and I use that
word loosely) is not based on logic at all, but special pleading, appeals
to ignorance, and ad hominem attacks on non-belief.
Is the following (from wikipedia) an accurate summary of the kind of way he
worked...? Because if it is, 'pathetic' is truly the word!!
----------
"...one of Lewis's best-known arguments in favor of Christianity from his
book Mere Christianity.
"According to the argument, most people are willing to accept Jesus Christ
as a great moral teacher, but the Gospels record that Jesus made many claims
to divinity, either explicitly ("I and the Father are one") or implicitly,
by assuming authority only God had ("The Son of Man has power on earth to
forgive sins"). Assuming that the Gospels are accurate, Lewis said there are
three options:
1.. Jesus was telling falsehoods and knew it, and so he was a liar.
2.. Jesus was telling falsehoods but believed he was telling the truth,
and so he was insane.
3.. Jesus was telling the truth, and so he was divine.
There are at least four options. One possible number four: CS and all
his homies were misinterpreting Jesus' statements.
--
Sir Baldin Pramer, RPA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Katt" |
|
| Title: Re: Militant Atheism And 'Nonpersons' As Natural Resources |
09 Aug 2005 10:40:53 AM |
|
|
"Baldin Pramer" <baldin@mailtoworld.com> wrote in message
news:42f8c887$1@nntp.zianet.com...
Katt wrote:
----------
"...one of Lewis's best-known arguments in favor of Christianity from his
book Mere Christianity.
"According to the argument, most people are willing to accept Jesus
Christ
as a great moral teacher, but the Gospels record that Jesus made many
claims
to divinity, either explicitly ("I and the Father are one") or
implicitly,
by assuming authority only God had ("The Son of Man has power on earth to
forgive sins"). Assuming that the Gospels are accurate, Lewis said there
are
three options:
1.. Jesus was telling falsehoods and knew it, and so he was a liar.
2.. Jesus was telling falsehoods but believed he was telling the truth,
and so he was insane.
3.. Jesus was telling the truth, and so he was divine.
There are at least four options. One possible number four: CS and all his
homies were misinterpreting Jesus' statements.
Actually, the part that had me in stitches was the ridiculous 'Assuming that
the Gospels are accurate...' bit that was just *squeezed in the crack there*
in the hope that no-one would notice it...!
Katt.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Terry Cross" |
|
| Title: Re: Militant Atheism And 'Nonpersons' As Natural Resources |
09 Aug 2005 04:44:49 PM |
|
|
Katt wrote:
"Baldin Pramer" <baldin@mailtoworld.com> wrote in message
news:42f8c887$1@nntp.zianet.com...
Katt wrote:
----------
"...one of Lewis's best-known arguments in favor of Christianity from his
book Mere Christianity.
"According to the argument, most people are willing to accept Jesus
Christ
as a great moral teacher, but the Gospels record that Jesus made many
claims
to divinity, either explicitly ("I and the Father are one") or
implicitly,
by assuming authority only God had ("The Son of Man has power on earth to
forgive sins"). Assuming that the Gospels are accurate, Lewis said there
are
three options:
1.. Jesus was telling falsehoods and knew it, and so he was a liar.
2.. Jesus was telling falsehoods but believed he was telling the truth,
and so he was insane.
3.. Jesus was telling the truth, and so he was divine.
There are at least four options. One possible number four: CS and all his
homies were misinterpreting Jesus' statements.
Actually, the part that had me in stitches was the ridiculous 'Assuming that
the Gospels are accurate...' bit that was just *squeezed in the crack there*
in the hope that no-one would notice it...!
Katt.
The very next word is "Lewis," showing that the phrase is not a quote.
(Lewis did not write about himself in third person). The author of the
Wikipedia article is doing an honest paraphrase of Lewis' writings.
This is a traditional literary form, and does not indicate the
dishonesty you impugn. The author is informing us that Lewis' argument
rests on the assumption that the Gospels are accurate.
In fact, the passage paraphrased is one of the more widely quoted of CS
Lewis' work. The Wikipedia author has done a fair job.
And before you come all to pieces as you are wont to do, Katt, you
should know I am not a believer in the divinity of Jesus. I am,
however, familiar enough with the style, the literature, and the
arguments to know the difference between a paraphrase and a quote.
TCross
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: Militant Atheism And 'Nonpersons' As Natural Resources |
09 Aug 2005 10:50:34 AM |
|
|
wrote in news:1123574387.535919.235400
@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Militant Atheism And 'Nonpersons' As Natural Resources
Another day, another crock of ***** gets cross-posted to alt.atheism.
--
Jez, MBA.,
Country Dancing and Advanced Astrology, UBS.
'Realism is seductive because once you have accepted the reasonable
notion that you should base your actions on reality, you are too often
led to accept, without much questioning, someone else's version of what
that reality is. It is a crucial act of independent thinking to be
skeptical of someone else's description of reality.'-
Howard Zinn
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Chris Johnson" |
|
| Title: Re: Militant Atheism And 'Nonpersons' As Natural Resources |
09 Aug 2005 01:34:25 PM |
|
|
Could you please stop posting other people's essays here? If you're
going to write something yourself, fine, but it's hardly worth
responding when the author isn't going to read my reply.
--
Chris
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Militant Atheism And 'Nonpersons' As Natural Resources |
09 Aug 2005 07:59:20 AM |
|
|
In episode <1123574387.535919.235400@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
wordsoftruth114 burst into the room and exclaimed:
In "Mere Christianity," CS Lewis...
Wrote a lot of boring, mediocre stuff as he was prone to do...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
--------------------------------------------------
"Come to think of it, there are already a million
monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet
is NOTHING like Shakespeare!" -- Blair Houghton
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Militant Atheism And 'Nonpersons' As Natural Resources |
09 Aug 2005 04:35:55 PM |
|
|
In episode <1123574387.535919.235400@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
wordsoftruth114 burst into the room and exclaimed:
Linda Kimball
Do you ever obtain actual permission to redistribute these articles or do
you just wantonly break federal law?
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
--------------------------------------------------
"Come to think of it, there are already a million
monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet
is NOTHING like Shakespeare!" -- Blair Houghton
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Militant Atheism And 'Nonpersons' As Natural Resources |
10 Aug 2005 11:44:27 AM |
|
|
On 9 Aug 2005 00:59:47 -0700, in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1123574387.535919.235400@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
Off topic.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "MarkA" |
|
| Title: Re: Militant Atheism And 'Nonpersons' As Natural Resources |
09 Aug 2005 11:45:39 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 00:59:47 -0700, wordsoftruth114 wrote:
Militant Atheism And 'Nonpersons' As Natural Resources
Sierra Times
Apr. 3, 2005
Linda Kimball
In "Mere Christianity," CS Lewis described how he came to believe in the
God of the Bible by virtue of reason. Over a period of years, Lewis
OK, so CS Lewis was an idiot. Was that your point?
--
MarkA
(still caught in the maze of twisty little passages, all different)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Militant Atheism And 'Nonpersons' As Natural Resources |
09 Aug 2005 04:36:15 PM |
|
|
In episode <pan.2005.08.09.16.45.37.765978@stopspam.net>, MarkA burst into
the room and exclaimed:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 00:59:47 -0700, wordsoftruth114 wrote:
Militant Atheism And 'Nonpersons' As Natural Resources
Sierra Times
Apr. 3, 2005
Linda Kimball
In "Mere Christianity," CS Lewis described how he came to believe in the
God of the Bible by virtue of reason. Over a period of years, Lewis
OK, so CS Lewis was an idiot. Was that your point?
When it comes to CS Lewis, what other point can there be?
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
--------------------------------------------------
"Come to think of it, there are already a million
monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet
is NOTHING like Shakespeare!" -- Blair Houghton
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
