This is where the liberal in-fighting should get interesting. Should
science prove the existence of a 'gay gene' and a test to identify
that gene, women will have the option of aborting these pre-borns
for no other reason than they don't want a gay son. Is anyone so
naive to think a parent would except a gay child, face unknown, if
they don't have to? The abortionists vs. the homos; this will be
interesting.

This is where the liberal in-fighting should get interesting. Should
science prove the existence of a 'gay gene' and a test to identify that
gene,

Moms' Genetics Might Help Produce Gay Sons

This is where the liberal in-fighting should get interesting.

This is where the liberal in-fighting should get interesting. Should science
prove the existence of a 'gay gene' and a test to identify that gene, women
will have the option of aborting these pre-borns for no other reason than
they don't want a gay son. Is anyone so naive to think a parent would except
a gay child, face unknown, if they don't have to? The abortionists vs. the
homos; this will be interesting.

http://www.forbes.com/lifestyle/health/feeds/hscout/2006/02/21/hscout531088.html




Moms' Genetics Might Help Produce Gay Sons






TUESDAY, Feb. 21 (HealthDay News) -- New research adds a twist to the debate
on the origins of sexual orientation, suggesting that the genetics of
mothers of multiple gay sons act differently than those of other women.

Scientists found that almost one fourth of the mothers who had more than one
gay son processed X chromosomes in their bodies in the same way. Normally,
women randomly process the chromosomes in one of two ways -- half go one
way, half go the other.

The research "confirms that there is a strong genetic basis for sexual
orientation, and that for some gay men, genes on the X chromosome are
involved," said study co-author Sven Bocklandt, a postdoctoral researcher at
the University of California at Los Angeles.







--
"Honesty, Integrity, Compassion, and Decency"

This is where the liberal in-fighting should get interesting. Should science
prove the existence of a 'gay gene' and a test to identify that gene, women
will have the option of aborting these pre-borns for no other reason than
they don't want a gay son. Is anyone so naive to think a parent would except
a gay child, face unknown, if they don't have to? The abortionists vs. the
homos; this will be interesting.

http://www.forbes.com/lifestyle/health/feeds/hscout/2006/02/21/hscout531088.html

Moms' Genetics Might Help Produce Gay Sons

TUESDAY, Feb. 21 (HealthDay News) -- New research adds a twist to the debate
on the origins of sexual orientation, suggesting that the genetics of
mothers of multiple gay sons act differently than those of other women.

Scientists found that almost one fourth of the mothers who had more than one
gay son processed X chromosomes in their bodies in the same way. Normally,
women randomly process the chromosomes in one of two ways -- half go one
way, half go the other.

The research "confirms that there is a strong genetic basis for sexual
orientation, and that for some gay men, genes on the X chromosome are
involved," said study co-author Sven Bocklandt, a postdoctoral researcher at
the University of California at Los Angeles.

Should science prove the existence of a 'gay gene' and a test to identify
that gene, women will have the option of aborting these pre-borns for no
other reason than they don't want a gay son.

This is where the liberal in-fighting should get interesting. Should science
prove the existence of a 'gay gene' and a test to identify that gene, women
will have the option of aborting these pre-borns for no other reason than
they don't want a gay son.