More Evidence Refutes Young Earth Creation



 Religions > Atheism > More Evidence Refutes Young Earth Creation

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Budikka666"
Date: 21 Apr 2006 04:40:08 PM
Object: More Evidence Refutes Young Earth Creation
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4928010.stm
"The research shows that the rift in the plates of the Earth that
caused the gap to open up happened about 41 million years ago, which
fits in with the build-up of ice sheets on Antarctica a few million
years later."
The more evidence they find, the better it fits and utterly rejects
young-Earth creationism.
Budikka
.

User: "kathryn"

Title: Re: More Evidence Refutes Young Earth Creation 22 Apr 2006 05:39:59 AM
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1145655608.046010.316040@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4928010.stm

"The research shows that the rift in the plates of the Earth that
caused the gap to open up happened about 41 million years ago, which
fits in with the build-up of ice sheets on Antarctica a few million
years later."

The more evidence they find, the better it fits and utterly rejects
young-Earth creationism.

Budikka

But they're just wrong!
.

User: "Ben Goren"

Title: Re: More Evidence Refutes Young Earth Creation 21 Apr 2006 06:09:44 PM
Budikka666 wrote:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4928010.stm

"The research shows that the rift in the plates of the Earth
that caused the gap to open up happened about 41 million years
ago, which fits in with the build-up of ice sheets on Antarctica
a few million years later."

The more evidence they find, the better it fits and utterly
rejects young-Earth creationism.

In addition to the well-established fact that the YECs spew
nothing but YUCK, this article discusses global climate change.
Anybody reading it should come away with some very clear ideas of
some very important points.
First, the Earth's climate changes. It's been much warmer than it
is now, and it's been much colder. This is a well-established and
unquestioned fact.
Second, the biosphere deals quite well with the temperature
swings.
Third--and most relevant to us humans--individual species do /not/
tend to deal well with temperature swings. Worse, individual
populations within species are usually fucked.
Finally, we /are/ changing the Earth's climate. It may seem
impossible to fill a lake using eyedroppers, but millions of
people all constantly using eyedroppers to move water a few drops
at a time will fill that lake in no time at all. Each time you
turn the switch in the car, flip a light switch, or boot up your
computer, you're adding another drop from from your eyedropper.
What can one conclude?
Well, first, that we don't need to worry about the Earth or the
environment as a whole. A million years from now--the blink of an
eye, really--it'll all be just as happy with or without us,
regardless.
On the other hand, there're some really delightful parts of the
environment that we're destroying with alarming rapidity. The
Earth can get along just fine without coral reefs...but do you
really want to deprive yourself and your grandchildren the chance
to enjoy them? It's like smashing up great-great-grandpa's fine
hardwood chest of drawers and tossing it in the fireplace just
so you can toast some marshmallows. Or, worse, stealing your
neighbor's great-great-grandpa's chest to burn....
If we don't modulate our voracious appetite, we'll kill ourselves
off.
No, likely not humanity--I think we're probably at least as
adaptable and resourceful as cockroaches or sharks; there'll
probably be humans around for a very, very long time. I mean,
instead, us individually. What happened in New Orleans could
happen many, many places around the globe. If it gets bad enough,
we're looking not just at massive loss of life here and there,
but a true global economic depression that'll make the Great
Depression look like a mild case of the blues. People will die off
in huge numbers as basic infrastructure collapses--just as it did
locally in the aftermath of Katrina. If you're not one of the ones
who dies, you'll at least be one of the ones out of a job and out
on the street. If you're one of the rich, you'll suffer the same
fate as the French Monarchy during the Revolution. Nobody--and I
mean nobody--will be happy.
But it doesn't have to be like that. I still have hope that we'll
dodge the bullet, mostly. We're in for some pain and rough times
ahead, but I /think/ that the negative feedback will be sufficient
to avoid the worst of it. Oil is getting scarce, causing prices to
rise, at just about the time when burning more oil is a very bad
idea. But more expensive oil means that people won't be burning as
much....
What we need to do is intelligently apply the two mantras of the
environmental movement: ``Reduce, reuse, and recycle'' and ``Think
globally, act locally.''
This is NOT a call for a self-induced ascetic poverty--quite the
opposite! Remember Ben Franklin--``A penny saved is a penny
earned''? /That's/ what I'm talking about.
The most environmentally-friendly options are /also/ the
friendliest to the pocketbook and to personal prosperity. True,
some--if not most--of them require greater initial spending, but
the personal payoff comes immediately in the form of a better
materialistic lifestyle, in the medium term financially, and
environmentally in the long term.
Never, ever buy another incandescent bulb. Compact fluorescents
don't have to be changed anywhere /near/ as often, they're capable
of providing much higher quality light (much more resembling
natural sunlight than normal bulbs), they cost less over their
lifetime, and they use less energy (thus reducing the load from
extraction and emissions). (There are some even more exciting
lighting technologies on the horizon.)
Don't buy a new car until it costs you as much to keep your old
one going as it would to buy a new one. Spend lavishly on the best
mechanic for repairs and rent a luxury car while it's in
the shop--and factor those increased costs into your financial
calculation. Barring an accident, you could well wind up driving a
prized classic antique that's a better car in every way than the
day it rolled off the factory floor. And you'll have saved tens
of thousands of dollars over what you would have had you bought
new cars every few years.
When you do buy a new car, buy one that gets the best possible
mileage and otherwise shows signs of excellent engineering. It'll
last longer, it'll cost you less money, you won't have to stop and
pay for gas nearly as much, and you'll generally be happier all
the way 'round.
In other words, think beyond just the next few days or
months. Make your plans for years at least, decades and more if at
all possible. Buy /quality/ goods, not cheap *****, and take
care of what you buy. When it's no more use to you, take
every reasonable means to make sure it doesn't wind up in a
landfill. Find some other use for it, sell it to somebody who
wants it, give it to somebody who could put it to good use, or
have it salvaged for scrap. The landfill should be the option of
/last/ resort--not the first as it is today. And, of course,
always opt for quality used items if it's just (or almost) as good
as new.
Remember, at the rate modern medicine is improving, it's /you/
who's likely to be stuck with the consequences, not just your
grandchildren.
``This concludes our irregularly-scheduled tree-hugging idealist
rant. We now return you to the illogical fuckwit fundy flamefest
already in progress.''
Cheers,
b&
--
EAC Memographer
BAAWA Knight of Blasphemy
``All but God can prove this sentence true.''
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
User: "Dave Oldridge"

Title: Re: More Evidence Refutes Young Earth Creation 22 Apr 2006 04:26:05 PM
Ben Goren <ben@trumpetpower.com> wrote in news:na5oh3-vlf.ln1
@reiche.trumpetpower.com:

Budikka666 wrote:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4928010.stm

"The research shows that the rift in the plates of the Earth
that caused the gap to open up happened about 41 million years
ago, which fits in with the build-up of ice sheets on Antarctica
a few million years later."

The more evidence they find, the better it fits and utterly
rejects young-Earth creationism.


In addition to the well-established fact that the YECs spew
nothing but YUCK, this article discusses global climate change.

Anybody reading it should come away with some very clear ideas of
some very important points.

First, the Earth's climate changes. It's been much warmer than it
is now, and it's been much colder. This is a well-established and
unquestioned fact.

Second, the biosphere deals quite well with the temperature
swings.

Third--and most relevant to us humans--individual species do /not/
tend to deal well with temperature swings. Worse, individual
populations within species are usually fucked.

Finally, we /are/ changing the Earth's climate. It may seem
impossible to fill a lake using eyedroppers, but millions of
people all constantly using eyedroppers to move water a few drops
at a time will fill that lake in no time at all. Each time you
turn the switch in the car, flip a light switch, or boot up your
computer, you're adding another drop from from your eyedropper.

What can one conclude?

Well, first, that we don't need to worry about the Earth or the
environment as a whole. A million years from now--the blink of an
eye, really--it'll all be just as happy with or without us,
regardless.

On the other hand, there're some really delightful parts of the
environment that we're destroying with alarming rapidity. The
Earth can get along just fine without coral reefs...but do you
really want to deprive yourself and your grandchildren the chance
to enjoy them? It's like smashing up great-great-grandpa's fine
hardwood chest of drawers and tossing it in the fireplace just
so you can toast some marshmallows. Or, worse, stealing your
neighbor's great-great-grandpa's chest to burn....

If we don't modulate our voracious appetite, we'll kill ourselves
off.

Yep...I keep saying that we have yet to demonstrate that, collectively,
we are any more intelligent in that respect than a yeast culture.

No, likely not humanity--I think we're probably at least as
adaptable and resourceful as cockroaches or sharks; there'll
probably be humans around for a very, very long time. I mean,
instead, us individually. What happened in New Orleans could
happen many, many places around the globe. If it gets bad enough,
we're looking not just at massive loss of life here and there,
but a true global economic depression that'll make the Great
Depression look like a mild case of the blues. People will die off
in huge numbers as basic infrastructure collapses--just as it did
locally in the aftermath of Katrina. If you're not one of the ones
who dies, you'll at least be one of the ones out of a job and out
on the street. If you're one of the rich, you'll suffer the same
fate as the French Monarchy during the Revolution. Nobody--and I
mean nobody--will be happy.

But it doesn't have to be like that. I still have hope that we'll
dodge the bullet, mostly. We're in for some pain and rough times
ahead, but I /think/ that the negative feedback will be sufficient
to avoid the worst of it. Oil is getting scarce, causing prices to
rise, at just about the time when burning more oil is a very bad
idea. But more expensive oil means that people won't be burning as
much....

What we need to do is intelligently apply the two mantras of the
environmental movement: ``Reduce, reuse, and recycle'' and ``Think
globally, act locally.''

This probably won't be enough unless we embark on a rapid (and hopefully
humane) program of reducing our population to a more sustainable level
and institute measures to keep it there. Also, I believe we should get
off the oil addiction as quickly as possible. The supply is simply
running out anyway. A temporary switch to uranium coupled with an honest
and serious attempt at population reduction and development of totally
new energy sources (solar power beamed from space for example) is what is
required. The worst offender is the ubiquitous automobile. That can be
tackled on multiple lines. Better mass transportation, electric autos,
etc. can all contribute to reducing the pollution from fossil fuels.

This is NOT a call for a self-induced ascetic poverty--quite the
opposite! Remember Ben Franklin--``A penny saved is a penny
earned''? /That's/ what I'm talking about.

Yep...doing it right should actually bring prosperity, even in places
where it's almost unheard of.

The most environmentally-friendly options are /also/ the
friendliest to the pocketbook and to personal prosperity. True,
some--if not most--of them require greater initial spending, but
the personal payoff comes immediately in the form of a better
materialistic lifestyle, in the medium term financially, and
environmentally in the long term.


Never, ever buy another incandescent bulb. Compact fluorescents
don't have to be changed anywhere /near/ as often, they're capable
of providing much higher quality light (much more resembling
natural sunlight than normal bulbs), they cost less over their
lifetime, and they use less energy (thus reducing the load from
extraction and emissions). (There are some even more exciting
lighting technologies on the horizon.)

I'm with you there. I use them for all my home lighting needs except the
hall and the bathroom (which lights are never on for more than a few
minutes at a time).

Don't buy a new car until it costs you as much to keep your old
one going as it would to buy a new one. Spend lavishly on the best
mechanic for repairs and rent a luxury car while it's in
the shop--and factor those increased costs into your financial
calculation. Barring an accident, you could well wind up driving a
prized classic antique that's a better car in every way than the
day it rolled off the factory floor. And you'll have saved tens
of thousands of dollars over what you would have had you bought
new cars every few years.


When you do buy a new car, buy one that gets the best possible
mileage and otherwise shows signs of excellent engineering. It'll
last longer, it'll cost you less money, you won't have to stop and
pay for gas nearly as much, and you'll generally be happier all
the way 'round.


In other words, think beyond just the next few days or
months. Make your plans for years at least, decades and more if at
all possible. Buy /quality/ goods, not cheap *****, and take
care of what you buy. When it's no more use to you, take
every reasonable means to make sure it doesn't wind up in a
landfill. Find some other use for it, sell it to somebody who
wants it, give it to somebody who could put it to good use, or
have it salvaged for scrap. The landfill should be the option of
/last/ resort--not the first as it is today. And, of course,
always opt for quality used items if it's just (or almost) as good
as new.


Remember, at the rate modern medicine is improving, it's /you/
who's likely to be stuck with the consequences, not just your
grandchildren.

Heh heh.

``This concludes our irregularly-scheduled tree-hugging idealist
rant. We now return you to the illogical fuckwit fundy flamefest
already in progress.''

I'm with you on the environmental stuff. We need to look after this
planet. It's the only one we have. And I don't see anyone having used-
planet sales.
--
Dave Oldridge+
ICQ 1800667
.

User: "Bill"

Title: Re: More Evidence Refutes Young Earth Creation 21 Apr 2006 07:09:05 PM
Congratulations. A good productive and interesting post.
"Ben Goren" <ben@trumpetpower.com> wrote in message
news:na5oh3-vlf.ln1@reiche.trumpetpower.com...

Budikka666 wrote:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4928010.stm

"The research shows that the rift in the plates of the Earth
that caused the gap to open up happened about 41 million years
ago, which fits in with the build-up of ice sheets on Antarctica
a few million years later."

The more evidence they find, the better it fits and utterly
rejects young-Earth creationism.


In addition to the well-established fact that the YECs spew
nothing but YUCK, this article discusses global climate change.

Anybody reading it should come away with some very clear ideas of
some very important points.

First, the Earth's climate changes. It's been much warmer than it
is now, and it's been much colder. This is a well-established and
unquestioned fact.

Second, the biosphere deals quite well with the temperature
swings.

Third--and most relevant to us humans--individual species do /not/
tend to deal well with temperature swings. Worse, individual
populations within species are usually fucked.

Finally, we /are/ changing the Earth's climate. It may seem
impossible to fill a lake using eyedroppers, but millions of
people all constantly using eyedroppers to move water a few drops
at a time will fill that lake in no time at all. Each time you
turn the switch in the car, flip a light switch, or boot up your
computer, you're adding another drop from from your eyedropper.

What can one conclude?

Well, first, that we don't need to worry about the Earth or the
environment as a whole. A million years from now--the blink of an
eye, really--it'll all be just as happy with or without us,
regardless.

On the other hand, there're some really delightful parts of the
environment that we're destroying with alarming rapidity. The
Earth can get along just fine without coral reefs...but do you
really want to deprive yourself and your grandchildren the chance
to enjoy them? It's like smashing up great-great-grandpa's fine
hardwood chest of drawers and tossing it in the fireplace just
so you can toast some marshmallows. Or, worse, stealing your
neighbor's great-great-grandpa's chest to burn....

If we don't modulate our voracious appetite, we'll kill ourselves
off.

No, likely not humanity--I think we're probably at least as
adaptable and resourceful as cockroaches or sharks; there'll
probably be humans around for a very, very long time. I mean,
instead, us individually. What happened in New Orleans could
happen many, many places around the globe. If it gets bad enough,
we're looking not just at massive loss of life here and there,
but a true global economic depression that'll make the Great
Depression look like a mild case of the blues. People will die off
in huge numbers as basic infrastructure collapses--just as it did
locally in the aftermath of Katrina. If you're not one of the ones
who dies, you'll at least be one of the ones out of a job and out
on the street. If you're one of the rich, you'll suffer the same
fate as the French Monarchy during the Revolution. Nobody--and I
mean nobody--will be happy.

But it doesn't have to be like that. I still have hope that we'll
dodge the bullet, mostly. We're in for some pain and rough times
ahead, but I /think/ that the negative feedback will be sufficient
to avoid the worst of it. Oil is getting scarce, causing prices to
rise, at just about the time when burning more oil is a very bad
idea. But more expensive oil means that people won't be burning as
much....

What we need to do is intelligently apply the two mantras of the
environmental movement: ``Reduce, reuse, and recycle'' and ``Think
globally, act locally.''

This is NOT a call for a self-induced ascetic poverty--quite the
opposite! Remember Ben Franklin--``A penny saved is a penny
earned''? /That's/ what I'm talking about.

The most environmentally-friendly options are /also/ the
friendliest to the pocketbook and to personal prosperity. True,
some--if not most--of them require greater initial spending, but
the personal payoff comes immediately in the form of a better
materialistic lifestyle, in the medium term financially, and
environmentally in the long term.

Never, ever buy another incandescent bulb. Compact fluorescents
don't have to be changed anywhere /near/ as often, they're capable
of providing much higher quality light (much more resembling
natural sunlight than normal bulbs), they cost less over their
lifetime, and they use less energy (thus reducing the load from
extraction and emissions). (There are some even more exciting
lighting technologies on the horizon.)

Don't buy a new car until it costs you as much to keep your old
one going as it would to buy a new one. Spend lavishly on the best
mechanic for repairs and rent a luxury car while it's in
the shop--and factor those increased costs into your financial
calculation. Barring an accident, you could well wind up driving a
prized classic antique that's a better car in every way than the
day it rolled off the factory floor. And you'll have saved tens
of thousands of dollars over what you would have had you bought
new cars every few years.

When you do buy a new car, buy one that gets the best possible
mileage and otherwise shows signs of excellent engineering. It'll
last longer, it'll cost you less money, you won't have to stop and
pay for gas nearly as much, and you'll generally be happier all
the way 'round.

In other words, think beyond just the next few days or
months. Make your plans for years at least, decades and more if at
all possible. Buy /quality/ goods, not cheap *****, and take
care of what you buy. When it's no more use to you, take
every reasonable means to make sure it doesn't wind up in a
landfill. Find some other use for it, sell it to somebody who
wants it, give it to somebody who could put it to good use, or
have it salvaged for scrap. The landfill should be the option of
/last/ resort--not the first as it is today. And, of course,
always opt for quality used items if it's just (or almost) as good
as new.

Remember, at the rate modern medicine is improving, it's /you/
who's likely to be stuck with the consequences, not just your
grandchildren.

``This concludes our irregularly-scheduled tree-hugging idealist
rant. We now return you to the illogical fuckwit fundy flamefest
already in progress.''

Cheers,

b&

--
EAC Memographer
BAAWA Knight of Blasphemy
``All but God can prove this sentence true.''

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----

.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
AQOTM: Malcolm Refutes Twelve Common Atheist Arguments, by Ron Baker (Pluralitas!)
Re: Vatican official refutes intelligent design
Pat Robertson Refutes Literal Interpretation of His Call for the Assassination of Venezuelan President Chavez
LIBERALS HATE AMERICA! Diary refutes Kerry claim
Malcolm Refutes Twelve Common Atheist Arguments
New Commercial Refutes Atheism
Dennis Prager Refutes Atheist Arguments
OT New fossil refutes creationism
Re: Vatican official refutes intelligent design
Hiley refutes Wheeler on The Quantum
Re: YECs.org - Young Earth Creationists - Young Earth Creation Science
In The Beginning Was Nothing: A Creation Story For Young Materialists
Re: Young Dumb and Republican
Surprise! 57 YO PA Pastor Sentenced For Raping 3 Young Girls
Liberal Hollywood Homosexuals Continue To Exploit Young Boys For Sex... (LIBERALS HATE AMERICA!)
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER