| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
24 Jan 2005 06:01:27 AM |
| Object: |
More fruti cakes |
In our email this moring
From : Doug Shannon [delete]
Sent : Sunday, January 23, 2005 8:18 PM
To : US
Subject : reversing seperation of church and state
Supreme Court Justice William Douglas Brag to his fellow lawyers at a
conference how he and his fellow justices turned the Constitution of the
United States on its head when they came up with this idea of "separation
of church and state". The United States foundation is based on the
teachings given at Mt. Sinai.
I would like to give a interpretation of some writings by a Jew concerning
the actions of man and the justice he will reap from those actions. Pay
particular attention to the last part of his writings. The very last part
of these writings you might find interesting to yourself how Christians
think. I believe everything here is found in the Koran. If not please write
back and tell me what you disagree with. I believe there is no New
Testament with out the Koran.
THREE STEPS TO THE DESTRUCTION OF A NATION
Hello
I wish to share with you what I have discovered in the Bible.
There are three steps to the destruction of a nation according to Paul an
apostle of Jesus Christ. If you think, it all makes sense in how we got to
be where we are and where we are going.
There are three steps to the destruction of a nation.
Romans 1, vs. 21 – 31
Step One:
For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave
thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts
were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise they became fools and
exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal
man and birds and animals and reptiles.
How does this compare to the environmental movement? Have we not made the
things in the environment gods?
The curse God put on this nation for this act is:
Therefore God gave them over in sinful desires of their hearts to sexual
impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another.
Hence the sexual revolution began:
Step Two:
They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created
things rather than the Creator - who is forever praised. Amen
Do we not worship our technology; the thing we have created?
The curse God put on this nation for this act is:
Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women
exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men
also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for
one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in
themselves the due penalty for perversion.
Hence the gay movement.
Why is the life expectancy for a gay person only 42? Men die of aids and
women die from alcohol abuse or suicide.
Step Three:
Furthermore since they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge
of God, he gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to not
be done.
Did we not remove God from the minds of our children, the next generation
of parents. leaders of this great nation when the Supreme Court
misinterpreted the Constitution of the United States, by stating anyone who
is an employee in the public school can not educate children in the ten
commandments.
The curse God put on this nation for this act is:
They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and
depravity, They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice, They
are gossips, slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they
invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; they are senseless,
faithless, heartless, ruthless. Although they know God's righteous decree
that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to
these very things but also approve of those who practice them.
So where do you think we are in this timetable?
Step Four:
There is no step four. This is it. We are on the last rung of the ladder.
Beyond this there is no hope for our nation. We are destine as a country to
become a weak, deprived, hungry third power unless we start climbing up
this ladder.
First step is to acknowledge God and make His ways our ways.
We need to take a stand for God and His Son Jesus Christ and receive into
our hearts the Holy Spirit, the comforter. Pray that God will bless us and
curse our enemies to the point they will cry out for mercy from God.
Through this act they will be saved and then we will be brothers and
sisters through Jesus.
The main reason we have gone down this path of destruction is because of
the Christians. I stand accused along with my brothers and sisters. As the
Supreme Court was taking prayer out of schools the Christian stood by and
let it happen. We were so occupied with the Vietnam War to be concerned
with what really matters. Was the Vietnam War a distraction put into play
so that this tragedy could take place? I don't know. I do know that the
Christians should have demanded U.S. Congress put the Supreme Court into
check a long time ago. We have removed God from the minds of our Children.
What hope do we have for this once great country?
I hope that your eyes will be open to what is happening. It is possible for
congress to overrule the separation of church and state. If a nation wide
petition could be started then this would bring up the debate to the
forefront and with prayer and God's blessing then the separation of church
and state could be a thing of the pass.
All praise to God the father of Abraham
Thank-you
*******************************************************************************************
.
|
|
| User: "CB" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
12 Feb 2005 08:04:50 PM |
|
|
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:420EA2A3.173D8510@hotmMOVEail.com...
CB wrote:
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:eesj01tqno9jfm4viv4ig9ego8o8h42t1a@4ax.com...
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
From Liberal moral relative equality, where nothing means anything of
worth,
except "humanity", which you lack
nothing is honored and nothing has virtue
except "humanity", which you lack
The "mutt" is the Liberal equivalent of the ideal man.
The ideal man is male, and the ideal woman is female. Both are
members of the human race.
No identity,
except "humanity", which you betray
no ancestral lineage,
except "humanity", which you atavistically deny.
no self respect.
Self respect is earned, for behaving humanely, for achievement, for
recognizing the affection of others. Self-respect based on "ancestral
lineage" is silly. There are any number of descendants of great men
and women that have been ineffectual nebbishes, like you are. A huge
percentage of Asia seems to be bastardly descended from Jenghis Khan;
what does it buy them in "self-respect". Nothing.
And of course the greatest figures in the religion you allegedly
espouse apparently left no descendants, while Pauline Christianity
denies any special place for the one "lineage" supposedly holding a
special role, offering salvation to all regardless of "identity" and
"ancestral lineage". And your Savior said "Blessed are the meek", so
you know what He thought of your precious racial pride.
Take a man's heritage away, his identity becomes as "mutted" as any other
Liberal relitive enlightenment
Sheer nonsense. Are you capable of explaining why - without coming across
as a bigot?
Liberalism has progressed such that ancestral honor is no longer relevant
for their contemporary lifestyles
--
CB
Proverbs 26:1
As snow in summer, and as rain in harvest, so honour is not seemly for a
fool.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky " |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
15 Feb 2005 09:55:57 PM |
|
|
CB wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:420EA2A3.173D8510@hotmMOVEail.com...
CB wrote:
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:eesj01tqno9jfm4viv4ig9ego8o8h42t1a@4ax.com...
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
From Liberal moral relative equality, where nothing means anything of
worth,
except "humanity", which you lack
nothing is honored and nothing has virtue
except "humanity", which you lack
The "mutt" is the Liberal equivalent of the ideal man.
The ideal man is male, and the ideal woman is female. Both are
members of the human race.
No identity,
except "humanity", which you betray
no ancestral lineage,
except "humanity", which you atavistically deny.
no self respect.
Self respect is earned, for behaving humanely, for achievement, for
recognizing the affection of others. Self-respect based on "ancestral
lineage" is silly. There are any number of descendants of great men
and women that have been ineffectual nebbishes, like you are. A huge
percentage of Asia seems to be bastardly descended from Jenghis Khan;
what does it buy them in "self-respect". Nothing.
And of course the greatest figures in the religion you allegedly
espouse apparently left no descendants, while Pauline Christianity
denies any special place for the one "lineage" supposedly holding a
special role, offering salvation to all regardless of "identity" and
"ancestral lineage". And your Savior said "Blessed are the meek", so
you know what He thought of your precious racial pride.
Take a man's heritage away, his identity becomes as "mutted" as any other
Liberal relitive enlightenment
Sheer nonsense. Are you capable of explaining why - without coming across
as a bigot?
Liberalism has progressed such that ancestral honor is no longer relevant
for their contemporary lifestyles
What is "ancestral honor"? Are you incapable of explaining ANYTHING you say?
RT
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Curly Surmudgeon" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
14 Feb 2005 05:32:26 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:04:50 -0500, CB wrote:
-------------snip-----------
Take a man's heritage away, his identity becomes as "mutted" as any other
Liberal relitive enlightenment
Sheer nonsense. Are you capable of explaining why - without coming across
as a bigot?
Liberalism has progressed such that ancestral honor is no longer relevant
for their contemporary lifestyles
lojbab: The short answer to you question is, "No."
-- Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.curlysurmudgeon.com http://mp3.dubyaspeak.com/internets.mp3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "CB" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
14 Feb 2005 10:31:07 AM |
|
|
"Curly Surmudgeon" <curly@curlysurmudgeon.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.02.14.11.32.19.632653@curlysurmudgeon.com...
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:04:50 -0500, CB wrote:
-------------snip-----------
Take a man's heritage away, his identity becomes as "mutted" as any
other
Liberal relitive enlightenment
Sheer nonsense. Are you capable of explaining why - without coming
across
as a bigot?
Liberalism has progressed such that ancestral honor is no longer relevant
for their contemporary lifestyles
lojbab: The short answer to you question is, "No."
One man's truth is another man's hatred toward the it.
Nothing I say will dispel your hate for me or the truth.
--
CB
When a Majority Doesn’t Work - George Chapman observed, in 1605, "Young men
think old men are fools." And so do progressives.
http://www.newsmax.com/commentarchive.shtml?a=2000/11/17/081547
.
|
|
|
| User: "Curly Surmudgeon" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
14 Feb 2005 02:20:42 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:31:07 -0500, CB wrote:
"Curly Surmudgeon" <curly@curlysurmudgeon.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.02.14.11.32.19.632653@curlysurmudgeon.com...
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:04:50 -0500, CB wrote:
-------------snip-----------
Take a man's heritage away, his identity becomes as "mutted" as any
other
Liberal relitive enlightenment
Sheer nonsense. Are you capable of explaining why - without coming
across
as a bigot?
Liberalism has progressed such that ancestral honor is no longer relevant
for their contemporary lifestyles
lojbab: The short answer to you question is, "No."
One man's truth is another man's hatred toward the it.
Nothing I say will dispel your hate for me or the truth.
Then I suggest that you cease hating those you fear, purchase a dictionary
and retake grades 7 through 12 paying particular attention to world and
American history.
A mind is such a terrible thing to lose.
-- Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.curlysurmudgeon.com http://mp3.dubyaspeak.com/internets.mp3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "CB" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
15 Feb 2005 01:05:45 AM |
|
|
"Curly Surmudgeon" <curly@curlysurmudgeon.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.02.14.20.20.36.647302@curlysurmudgeon.com...
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:31:07 -0500, CB wrote:
"Curly Surmudgeon" <curly@curlysurmudgeon.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.02.14.11.32.19.632653@curlysurmudgeon.com...
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:04:50 -0500, CB wrote:
-------------snip-----------
Take a man's heritage away, his identity becomes as "mutted" as any
other
Liberal relitive enlightenment
Sheer nonsense. Are you capable of explaining why - without coming
across
as a bigot?
Liberalism has progressed such that ancestral honor is no longer
relevant
for their contemporary lifestyles
lojbab: The short answer to you question is, "No."
One man's truth is another man's hatred toward the it.
Nothing I say will dispel your hate for me or the truth.
Then I suggest that you cease hating those you fear, purchase a dictionary
and retake grades 7 through 12 paying particular attention to world and
American history.
A mind is such a terrible thing to lose.
Its waste, a mind is a terrible thing to waste, not lose.
Me thinks you should get some learnen
-- Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.curlysurmudgeon.com http://mp3.dubyaspeak.com/internets.mp3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "Curly Surmudgeon" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
15 Feb 2005 02:43:19 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 02:05:45 -0500, CB wrote:
----------------snip------------
A mind is such a terrible thing to lose.
Its waste, a mind is a terrible thing to waste, not lose.
Me thinks you should get some learnen
Thanks for proving my point. Did you graduate middle school?
-- Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.curlysurmudgeon.com http://mp3.dubyaspeak.com/internets.mp3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "CB" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
15 Feb 2005 01:05:00 AM |
|
|
"Curly Surmudgeon" <curly@curlysurmudgeon.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.02.14.20.20.36.647302@curlysurmudgeon.com...
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:31:07 -0500, CB wrote:
"Curly Surmudgeon" <curly@curlysurmudgeon.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.02.14.11.32.19.632653@curlysurmudgeon.com...
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:04:50 -0500, CB wrote:
-------------snip-----------
Take a man's heritage away, his identity becomes as "mutted" as any
other
Liberal relitive enlightenment
Sheer nonsense. Are you capable of explaining why - without coming
across
as a bigot?
Liberalism has progressed such that ancestral honor is no longer
relevant
for their contemporary lifestyles
lojbab: The short answer to you question is, "No."
One man's truth is another man's hatred toward the it.
Nothing I say will dispel your hate for me or the truth.
Then I suggest that you cease hating those you fear, purchase a dictionary
and retake grades 7 through 12 paying particular attention to world and
American history.
A mind is such a terrible thing to lose.
Its waste, a mind is a terrible thing to waste, not lose.
Be think you should get some learnen
-- Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.curlysurmudgeon.com http://mp3.dubyaspeak.com/internets.mp3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "Curly Surmudgeon" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
15 Feb 2005 02:43:59 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 02:05:00 -0500, CB wrote:
--------------snip------------
A mind is such a terrible thing to lose.
Its waste, a mind is a terrible thing to waste, not lose.
Be think you should get some learnen
Do you feel no shame?
-- Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.curlysurmudgeon.com http://mp3.dubyaspeak.com/internets.mp3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Curly Surmudgeon" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
16 Feb 2005 01:20:25 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 02:05:00 -0500, CB wrote:
--------------snip------------
Nothing I say will dispel your hate for me or the truth.
Then I suggest that you cease hating those you fear, purchase a dictionary
and retake grades 7 through 12 paying particular attention to world and
American history.
A mind is such a terrible thing to lose.
Its waste, a mind is a terrible thing to waste, not lose.
Be think you should get some learnen
Do you speak like this in person? Seriously, CB, you should go hide your
head in shame for offering such gibberish, it's embarrassing to watch. If
a member of my family spoke that way I'd have them tested for retardation.
-- Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.curlysurmudgeon.com http://mp3.dubyaspeak.com/internets.mp3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky " |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
20 Feb 2005 09:27:12 PM |
|
|
Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 02:05:00 -0500, CB wrote:
--------------snip------------
Nothing I say will dispel your hate for me or the truth.
Then I suggest that you cease hating those you fear, purchase a dictionary
and retake grades 7 through 12 paying particular attention to world and
American history.
A mind is such a terrible thing to lose.
Its waste, a mind is a terrible thing to waste, not lose.
Be think you should get some learnen
Do you speak like this in person? Seriously, CB, you should go hide your
head in shame for offering such gibberish, it's embarrassing to watch. If
a member of my family spoke that way I'd have them tested for retardation.
Or put in a remedial class at least...
RT
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Shadow Walker" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
09 Feb 2005 10:25:29 AM |
|
|
CB wrote:
"Bob LeChevalier" < > wrote in message
news:eesj01tqno9jfm4viv4ig9ego8o8h42t1a@4ax.com...
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
From Liberal moral relative equality, where nothing means anything of
worth,
except "humanity", which you lack
nothing is honored and nothing has virtue
except "humanity", which you lack
The "mutt" is the Liberal equivalent of the ideal man.
The ideal man is male, and the ideal woman is female. Both are
members of the human race.
No identity,
except "humanity", which you betray
no ancestral lineage,
except "humanity", which you atavistically deny.
no self respect.
Self respect is earned, for behaving humanely, for achievement, for
recognizing the affection of others. Self-respect based on "ancestral
lineage" is silly. There are any number of descendants of great men
and women that have been ineffectual nebbishes, like you are. A huge
percentage of Asia seems to be bastardly descended from Jenghis Khan;
what does it buy them in "self-respect". Nothing.
And of course the greatest figures in the religion you allegedly
espouse apparently left no descendants, while Pauline Christianity
denies any special place for the one "lineage" supposedly holding a
special role, offering salvation to all regardless of "identity" and
"ancestral lineage". And your Savior said "Blessed are the meek", so
you know what He thought of your precious racial pride.
Take a man's heritage away, his identity becomes as "mutted" as any other
Liberal relitive enlightenment
"Liberal relative enlightenment"
I have tried several methods to attempt to make sense
of this sentence, please feel free to interpret the gibberish.
lojbab
--
lojbab
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "CB" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
09 Feb 2005 10:37:17 AM |
|
|
"Shadow Walker" <shadow@onecall.net> wrote in message
news:cuddku$9s4$1@news.onecall.net...
CB wrote:
"Bob LeChevalier" < > wrote in message
news:eesj01tqno9jfm4viv4ig9ego8o8h42t1a@4ax.com...
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
From Liberal moral relative equality, where nothing means anything of
worth,
except "humanity", which you lack
nothing is honored and nothing has virtue
except "humanity", which you lack
The "mutt" is the Liberal equivalent of the ideal man.
The ideal man is male, and the ideal woman is female. Both are
members of the human race.
No identity,
except "humanity", which you betray
no ancestral lineage,
except "humanity", which you atavistically deny.
no self respect.
Self respect is earned, for behaving humanely, for achievement, for
recognizing the affection of others. Self-respect based on "ancestral
lineage" is silly. There are any number of descendants of great men
and women that have been ineffectual nebbishes, like you are. A huge
percentage of Asia seems to be bastardly descended from Jenghis Khan;
what does it buy them in "self-respect". Nothing.
And of course the greatest figures in the religion you allegedly
espouse apparently left no descendants, while Pauline Christianity
denies any special place for the one "lineage" supposedly holding a
special role, offering salvation to all regardless of "identity" and
"ancestral lineage". And your Savior said "Blessed are the meek", so
you know what He thought of your precious racial pride.
Take a man's heritage away, his identity becomes as "mutted" as any other
Liberal relitive enlightenment
"Liberal relative enlightenment"
I have tried several methods to attempt to make sense
of this sentence, please feel free to interpret the gibberish.
It's all relitve
lojbab
--
lojbab
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky " |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
12 Feb 2005 06:44:26 PM |
|
|
"Shadow Walker" <shadow@onecall.net> wrote in message
news:cuddku$9s4$1@news.onecall.net...
CB wrote:
[...]
Take a man's heritage away, his identity becomes as "mutted" as any other
Liberal relitive enlightenment
"Liberal relative enlightenment"
I have tried several methods to attempt to make sense
of this sentence, please feel free to interpret the gibberish.
SW - CB is borderline literate.
RT
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Curly Surmudgeon" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
09 Feb 2005 04:27:47 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 11:37:17 -0500, CB wrote:
"Shadow Walker" <shadow@onecall.net> wrote in message
news:cuddku$9s4$1@news.onecall.net...
CB wrote:
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:eesj01tqno9jfm4viv4ig9ego8o8h42t1a@4ax.com...
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
From Liberal moral relative equality, where nothing means anything of
worth,
except "humanity", which you lack
nothing is honored and nothing has virtue
except "humanity", which you lack
The "mutt" is the Liberal equivalent of the ideal man.
The ideal man is male, and the ideal woman is female. Both are
members of the human race.
No identity,
except "humanity", which you betray
no ancestral lineage,
except "humanity", which you atavistically deny.
no self respect.
Self respect is earned, for behaving humanely, for achievement, for
recognizing the affection of others. Self-respect based on "ancestral
lineage" is silly. There are any number of descendants of great men
and women that have been ineffectual nebbishes, like you are. A huge
percentage of Asia seems to be bastardly descended from Jenghis Khan;
what does it buy them in "self-respect". Nothing.
And of course the greatest figures in the religion you allegedly
espouse apparently left no descendants, while Pauline Christianity
denies any special place for the one "lineage" supposedly holding a
special role, offering salvation to all regardless of "identity" and
"ancestral lineage". And your Savior said "Blessed are the meek", so
you know what He thought of your precious racial pride.
Take a man's heritage away, his identity becomes as "mutted" as any other
Liberal relitive enlightenment
"Liberal relative enlightenment"
I have tried several methods to attempt to make sense
of this sentence, please feel free to interpret the gibberish.
It's all relitve
Is English a second language? I really don't comprehend your meaning.
You'll rarely see me mention a typo or grammar error, I make lots of typos
myself. But sometimes a posting is so arcane, so incomprehensible, so off
the wall that I just have to inquire.
Usually I'll grok the meaning of even poorly written statements from the
context but here, and elsewhere in CB's postings, there is no contex to
work from. Give a clue. Give me a vowel too.
I work with, and know, people from other nations who speak poor English
and with others who speak no English and we must communicate with my
limited abilities in their language. Rarely have I seen this degree of
limited communication ability outside the autistic.
Am I missing something here?
-- Regards, Curly
----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.curlysurmudgeon.com http://www.curlysurmudgeon.com/blog/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "CB" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
11 Feb 2005 12:07:16 AM |
|
|
"Curly Surmudgeon" <curly@curlysurmudgeon.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.02.09.22.27.45.349369@curlysurmudgeon.com...
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 11:37:17 -0500, CB wrote:
"Shadow Walker" <shadow@onecall.net> wrote in message
news:cuddku$9s4$1@news.onecall.net...
CB wrote:
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:eesj01tqno9jfm4viv4ig9ego8o8h42t1a@4ax.com...
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
From Liberal moral relative equality, where nothing means anything of
worth,
except "humanity", which you lack
nothing is honored and nothing has virtue
except "humanity", which you lack
The "mutt" is the Liberal equivalent of the ideal man.
The ideal man is male, and the ideal woman is female. Both are
members of the human race.
No identity,
except "humanity", which you betray
no ancestral lineage,
except "humanity", which you atavistically deny.
no self respect.
Self respect is earned, for behaving humanely, for achievement, for
recognizing the affection of others. Self-respect based on "ancestral
lineage" is silly. There are any number of descendants of great men
and women that have been ineffectual nebbishes, like you are. A huge
percentage of Asia seems to be bastardly descended from Jenghis Khan;
what does it buy them in "self-respect". Nothing.
And of course the greatest figures in the religion you allegedly
espouse apparently left no descendants, while Pauline Christianity
denies any special place for the one "lineage" supposedly holding a
special role, offering salvation to all regardless of "identity" and
"ancestral lineage". And your Savior said "Blessed are the meek", so
you know what He thought of your precious racial pride.
Take a man's heritage away, his identity becomes as "mutted" as any
other
Liberal relitive enlightenment
"Liberal relative enlightenment"
I have tried several methods to attempt to make sense
of this sentence, please feel free to interpret the gibberish.
It's all relitve
Is English a second language? I really don't comprehend your meaning.
You'll rarely see me mention a typo or grammar error, I make lots of typos
myself. But sometimes a posting is so arcane, so incomprehensible, so off
the wall that I just have to inquire.
Usually I'll grok the meaning of even poorly written statements from the
context but here, and elsewhere in CB's postings, there is no contex to
work from. Give a clue. Give me a vowel too.
I work with, and know, people from other nations who speak poor English
and with others who speak no English and we must communicate with my
limited abilities in their language. Rarely have I seen this degree of
limited communication ability outside the autistic.
Am I missing something here?
I have nothing to say to you because what ever I say you'll twist it into
bigotry.
-- Regards, Curly
----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.curlysurmudgeon.com http://www.curlysurmudgeon.com/blog/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky " |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
12 Feb 2005 06:48:21 PM |
|
|
CB wrote:
"Curly Surmudgeon" <curly@curlysurmudgeon.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.02.09.22.27.45.349369@curlysurmudgeon.com...
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 11:37:17 -0500, CB wrote:
"Shadow Walker" <shadow@onecall.net> wrote in message
news:cuddku$9s4$1@news.onecall.net...
CB wrote:
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:eesj01tqno9jfm4viv4ig9ego8o8h42t1a@4ax.com...
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
From Liberal moral relative equality, where nothing means anything of
worth,
except "humanity", which you lack
nothing is honored and nothing has virtue
except "humanity", which you lack
The "mutt" is the Liberal equivalent of the ideal man.
The ideal man is male, and the ideal woman is female. Both are
members of the human race.
No identity,
except "humanity", which you betray
no ancestral lineage,
except "humanity", which you atavistically deny.
no self respect.
Self respect is earned, for behaving humanely, for achievement, for
recognizing the affection of others. Self-respect based on "ancestral
lineage" is silly. There are any number of descendants of great men
and women that have been ineffectual nebbishes, like you are. A huge
percentage of Asia seems to be bastardly descended from Jenghis Khan;
what does it buy them in "self-respect". Nothing.
And of course the greatest figures in the religion you allegedly
espouse apparently left no descendants, while Pauline Christianity
denies any special place for the one "lineage" supposedly holding a
special role, offering salvation to all regardless of "identity" and
"ancestral lineage". And your Savior said "Blessed are the meek", so
you know what He thought of your precious racial pride.
Take a man's heritage away, his identity becomes as "mutted" as any
other
Liberal relitive enlightenment
"Liberal relative enlightenment"
I have tried several methods to attempt to make sense
of this sentence, please feel free to interpret the gibberish.
It's all relitve
Is English a second language? I really don't comprehend your meaning.
You'll rarely see me mention a typo or grammar error, I make lots of typos
myself. But sometimes a posting is so arcane, so incomprehensible, so off
the wall that I just have to inquire.
Usually I'll grok the meaning of even poorly written statements from the
context but here, and elsewhere in CB's postings, there is no contex to
work from. Give a clue. Give me a vowel too.
I work with, and know, people from other nations who speak poor English
and with others who speak no English and we must communicate with my
limited abilities in their language. Rarely have I seen this degree of
limited communication ability outside the autistic.
Am I missing something here?
I have nothing to say to you because what ever I say you'll twist it into
bigotry.
It's hard to misinterpret "***** you *****" ...
.
|
|
|
| User: "CB" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
12 Feb 2005 07:15:46 PM |
|
|
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:420EA3D5.1D8907BC@hotmMOVEail.com...
CB wrote:
"Curly Surmudgeon" <curly@curlysurmudgeon.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.02.09.22.27.45.349369@curlysurmudgeon.com...
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 11:37:17 -0500, CB wrote:
"Shadow Walker" <shadow@onecall.net> wrote in message
news:cuddku$9s4$1@news.onecall.net...
CB wrote:
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:eesj01tqno9jfm4viv4ig9ego8o8h42t1a@4ax.com...
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
From Liberal moral relative equality, where nothing means anything
of
worth,
except "humanity", which you lack
nothing is honored and nothing has virtue
except "humanity", which you lack
The "mutt" is the Liberal equivalent of the ideal man.
The ideal man is male, and the ideal woman is female. Both are
members of the human race.
No identity,
except "humanity", which you betray
no ancestral lineage,
except "humanity", which you atavistically deny.
no self respect.
Self respect is earned, for behaving humanely, for achievement, for
recognizing the affection of others. Self-respect based on
"ancestral
lineage" is silly. There are any number of descendants of great men
and women that have been ineffectual nebbishes, like you are. A
huge
percentage of Asia seems to be bastardly descended from Jenghis
Khan;
what does it buy them in "self-respect". Nothing.
And of course the greatest figures in the religion you allegedly
espouse apparently left no descendants, while Pauline Christianity
denies any special place for the one "lineage" supposedly holding a
special role, offering salvation to all regardless of "identity" and
"ancestral lineage". And your Savior said "Blessed are the meek",
so
you know what He thought of your precious racial pride.
Take a man's heritage away, his identity becomes as "mutted" as any
other
Liberal relitive enlightenment
"Liberal relative enlightenment"
I have tried several methods to attempt to make sense
of this sentence, please feel free to interpret the gibberish.
It's all relitve
Is English a second language? I really don't comprehend your meaning.
You'll rarely see me mention a typo or grammar error, I make lots of
typos
myself. But sometimes a posting is so arcane, so incomprehensible, so
off
the wall that I just have to inquire.
Usually I'll grok the meaning of even poorly written statements from
the
context but here, and elsewhere in CB's postings, there is no contex to
work from. Give a clue. Give me a vowel too.
I work with, and know, people from other nations who speak poor English
and with others who speak no English and we must communicate with my
limited abilities in their language. Rarely have I seen this degree of
limited communication ability outside the autistic.
Am I missing something here?
I have nothing to say to you because what ever I say you'll twist it into
bigotry.
It's hard to misinterpret "***** you *****" ...
The shoe sure fit that time, homey
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky " |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
15 Feb 2005 09:52:03 PM |
|
|
CB wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:420EA3D5.1D8907BC@hotmMOVEail.com...
CB wrote:
"Curly Surmudgeon" <curly@curlysurmudgeon.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.02.09.22.27.45.349369@curlysurmudgeon.com...
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 11:37:17 -0500, CB wrote:
"Shadow Walker" <shadow@onecall.net> wrote in message
news:cuddku$9s4$1@news.onecall.net...
CB wrote:
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:eesj01tqno9jfm4viv4ig9ego8o8h42t1a@4ax.com...
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
From Liberal moral relative equality, where nothing means anything
of
worth,
except "humanity", which you lack
nothing is honored and nothing has virtue
except "humanity", which you lack
The "mutt" is the Liberal equivalent of the ideal man.
The ideal man is male, and the ideal woman is female. Both are
members of the human race.
No identity,
except "humanity", which you betray
no ancestral lineage,
except "humanity", which you atavistically deny.
no self respect.
Self respect is earned, for behaving humanely, for achievement, for
recognizing the affection of others. Self-respect based on
"ancestral
lineage" is silly. There are any number of descendants of great men
and women that have been ineffectual nebbishes, like you are. A
huge
percentage of Asia seems to be bastardly descended from Jenghis
Khan;
what does it buy them in "self-respect". Nothing.
And of course the greatest figures in the religion you allegedly
espouse apparently left no descendants, while Pauline Christianity
denies any special place for the one "lineage" supposedly holding a
special role, offering salvation to all regardless of "identity" and
"ancestral lineage". And your Savior said "Blessed are the meek",
so
you know what He thought of your precious racial pride.
Take a man's heritage away, his identity becomes as "mutted" as any
other
Liberal relitive enlightenment
"Liberal relative enlightenment"
I have tried several methods to attempt to make sense
of this sentence, please feel free to interpret the gibberish.
It's all relitve
Is English a second language? I really don't comprehend your meaning.
You'll rarely see me mention a typo or grammar error, I make lots of
typos
myself. But sometimes a posting is so arcane, so incomprehensible, so
off
the wall that I just have to inquire.
Usually I'll grok the meaning of even poorly written statements from
the
context but here, and elsewhere in CB's postings, there is no contex to
work from. Give a clue. Give me a vowel too.
I work with, and know, people from other nations who speak poor English
and with others who speak no English and we must communicate with my
limited abilities in their language. Rarely have I seen this degree of
limited communication ability outside the autistic.
Am I missing something here?
I have nothing to say to you because what ever I say you'll twist it into
bigotry.
It's hard to misinterpret "***** you *****" ...
The shoe sure fit that time, homey
This ugly shoe fits you:
To appose racial mixing is respecting race not putting it down. People are
different, in skin color and belief. We are not mutts like some mono-culture. - CB
.
|
|
|
| User: "CB" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
16 Feb 2005 12:06:36 AM |
|
|
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:4212C363.39D1921B@hotmMOVEail.com...
CB wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:420EA3D5.1D8907BC@hotmMOVEail.com...
CB wrote:
"Curly Surmudgeon" <curly@curlysurmudgeon.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.02.09.22.27.45.349369@curlysurmudgeon.com...
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 11:37:17 -0500, CB wrote:
"Shadow Walker" <shadow@onecall.net> wrote in message
news:cuddku$9s4$1@news.onecall.net...
CB wrote:
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:eesj01tqno9jfm4viv4ig9ego8o8h42t1a@4ax.com...
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
From Liberal moral relative equality, where nothing means
anything
of
worth,
except "humanity", which you lack
nothing is honored and nothing has virtue
except "humanity", which you lack
The "mutt" is the Liberal equivalent of the ideal man.
The ideal man is male, and the ideal woman is female. Both are
members of the human race.
No identity,
except "humanity", which you betray
no ancestral lineage,
except "humanity", which you atavistically deny.
no self respect.
Self respect is earned, for behaving humanely, for achievement,
for
recognizing the affection of others. Self-respect based on
"ancestral
lineage" is silly. There are any number of descendants of great
men
and women that have been ineffectual nebbishes, like you are. A
huge
percentage of Asia seems to be bastardly descended from Jenghis
Khan;
what does it buy them in "self-respect". Nothing.
And of course the greatest figures in the religion you allegedly
espouse apparently left no descendants, while Pauline
Christianity
denies any special place for the one "lineage" supposedly holding
a
special role, offering salvation to all regardless of "identity"
and
"ancestral lineage". And your Savior said "Blessed are the
meek",
so
you know what He thought of your precious racial pride.
Take a man's heritage away, his identity becomes as "mutted" as
any
other
Liberal relitive enlightenment
"Liberal relative enlightenment"
I have tried several methods to attempt to make sense
of this sentence, please feel free to interpret the gibberish.
It's all relitve
Is English a second language? I really don't comprehend your
meaning.
You'll rarely see me mention a typo or grammar error, I make lots of
typos
myself. But sometimes a posting is so arcane, so incomprehensible,
so
off
the wall that I just have to inquire.
Usually I'll grok the meaning of even poorly written statements from
the
context but here, and elsewhere in CB's postings, there is no contex
to
work from. Give a clue. Give me a vowel too.
I work with, and know, people from other nations who speak poor
English
and with others who speak no English and we must communicate with my
limited abilities in their language. Rarely have I seen this degree
of
limited communication ability outside the autistic.
Am I missing something here?
I have nothing to say to you because what ever I say you'll twist it
into
bigotry.
It's hard to misinterpret "***** you *****" ...
The shoe sure fit that time, homey
This ugly shoe fits you:
To appose racial mixing is respecting race not putting it down. People are
different, in skin color and belief. We are not mutts like some
mono-culture. - CB
I know you're unable to explain exactly what you find objectionable in that
statement, if you 'could', you would have offered some type of editorial
rather than a racist innuendo.
Unlike you, I do explain my beliefs in detail. Never have you been
courageous enough to get past posting a quote, as if on face we're to accept
your bigotry out of context.
Why don't you be so kind as to post the "***** for brains" statement which
earned you "*****"? Because you're a coward
--
CB
The false charge of racism is simply a tactic to choke off rational
discussion, a strategy of intimidation to silence expression . . . It
is based on a shrewd calculation of the moral cowardice of man . . .
fearful of becoming the target of such abuse.--Sidney Hook
That discussion is about character, not skin color
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky " |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
20 Feb 2005 09:26:42 PM |
|
|
CB wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:4212C363.39D1921B@hotmMOVEail.com...
CB wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:420EA3D5.1D8907BC@hotmMOVEail.com...
CB wrote:
"Curly Surmudgeon" <curly@curlysurmudgeon.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.02.09.22.27.45.349369@curlysurmudgeon.com...
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 11:37:17 -0500, CB wrote:
"Shadow Walker" <shadow@onecall.net> wrote in message
news:cuddku$9s4$1@news.onecall.net...
CB wrote:
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:eesj01tqno9jfm4viv4ig9ego8o8h42t1a@4ax.com...
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
From Liberal moral relative equality, where nothing means
anything
of
worth,
except "humanity", which you lack
nothing is honored and nothing has virtue
except "humanity", which you lack
The "mutt" is the Liberal equivalent of the ideal man.
The ideal man is male, and the ideal woman is female. Both are
members of the human race.
No identity,
except "humanity", which you betray
no ancestral lineage,
except "humanity", which you atavistically deny.
no self respect.
Self respect is earned, for behaving humanely, for achievement,
for
recognizing the affection of others. Self-respect based on
"ancestral
lineage" is silly. There are any number of descendants of great
men
and women that have been ineffectual nebbishes, like you are. A
huge
percentage of Asia seems to be bastardly descended from Jenghis
Khan;
what does it buy them in "self-respect". Nothing.
And of course the greatest figures in the religion you allegedly
espouse apparently left no descendants, while Pauline
Christianity
denies any special place for the one "lineage" supposedly holding
a
special role, offering salvation to all regardless of "identity"
and
"ancestral lineage". And your Savior said "Blessed are the
meek",
so
you know what He thought of your precious racial pride.
Take a man's heritage away, his identity becomes as "mutted" as
any
other
Liberal relitive enlightenment
"Liberal relative enlightenment"
I have tried several methods to attempt to make sense
of this sentence, please feel free to interpret the gibberish.
It's all relitve
Is English a second language? I really don't comprehend your
meaning.
You'll rarely see me mention a typo or grammar error, I make lots of
typos
myself. But sometimes a posting is so arcane, so incomprehensible,
so
off
the wall that I just have to inquire.
Usually I'll grok the meaning of even poorly written statements from
the
context but here, and elsewhere in CB's postings, there is no contex
to
work from. Give a clue. Give me a vowel too.
I work with, and know, people from other nations who speak poor
English
and with others who speak no English and we must communicate with my
limited abilities in their language. Rarely have I seen this degree
of
limited communication ability outside the autistic.
Am I missing something here?
I have nothing to say to you because what ever I say you'll twist it
into
bigotry.
It's hard to misinterpret "***** you *****" ...
The shoe sure fit that time, homey
This ugly shoe fits you:
To appose racial mixing is respecting race not putting it down. People are
different, in skin color and belief. We are not mutts like some
mono-culture. - CB
I know you're unable to explain exactly what you find objectionable in that
statement, if you 'could', you would have offered some type of editorial
rather than a racist innuendo.
It's white supremacist talk. Get help.
Unlike you, I do explain my beliefs in detail. Never have you been
courageous enough to get past posting a quote, as if on face we're to accept
your bigotry out of context.
You've explained you "saw" your special definition of "*****" in a dictionary -
yeah right...
Why don't you be so kind as to post the "***** for brains" statement which
earned you "*****"? Because you're a coward
I've posted it several times. Want to see it again?
From: "CB" <CB@prayforme.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican, alt.politics.democrats.d,
talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.bush
Subject: Re: ChiComs Stick It To Duhbya - What's He Gonna Do?
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 16:46:11 -0700
Organization: CompuServe Interactive Services
***** you *****
"Rich Travsky" <SNOOTrtravsky@REMOVEhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3ACB7D73.700A758@REMOVEhotmail.com...
CB wrote:
news:3ACB7D73.700A758@REMOVEhotmail.com...
CB wrote:
I just forwarded your allegation to i...@judicialwatch.org.
Talk is cheap until you get in front of a judge so I doubt if Larry
Klayman
really worries over what me or you have as an opinion.
I'm sure Griffin is reallllyy scared, Crap for Brains.
...
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Laff@Pajamaloon" |
|
| Title: Re: More Charley Barta Twaddle-----But he's still a racist, bigot and homophobe |
16 Feb 2005 08:52:01 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 01:06:36 -0500, "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
Unlike you, I do explain my beliefs in detail. Never have you been
courageous enough to get past posting a quote, as if on face we're to accept
your bigotry out of context.
First of all, your "explanations" are absolute babbling. I seriously
doubt even you could understand them if you went back a read them from
the standpoint of someone trying to figure out what in ***** you were
talking about.
Second, when you call someone a "*****", context has NOTHING to do
with it. "*****" is a racist slur. Under ANY circumstance. It is
un-christian, it is immoral.
More important, is because you refuse to stop using it, apologize and
recognize that word for what it is, proves beyond any doubt what a
thoroughly disgusting ***** you are.
Third, hiding behind a professed belief in biblical principles is the
biggest laugh we get from you around here. I'd be willing to bet you
haven't the fucking courage to show ANY credible religious person
(minister, pastor, rabbi, or cleric) whay you've written about
"niggers", "intermarriage", work ethic of blacks, your homophobia and
bigotry and be given a pat on the back
You're a disgusting bigot, Barta.
---------------------------------------------------------
"Unfrozen Caveman Politician Gore":
<CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
No one wants a foul mouthed ***** working for him, no matter
what skin he wears.
.
|
|
|
| User: "CB" |
|
| Title: Re: More Charley Barta Twaddle-----But he's still a racist, bigot and homophobe |
16 Feb 2005 10:36:43 AM |
|
|
<Laff@Pajamaloon> wrote in message
news:l5n611dfosbc8a1136vbq4alm2d5jom71l@4ax.com...
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 01:06:36 -0500, "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
Unlike you, I do explain my beliefs in detail. Never have you been
courageous enough to get past posting a quote, as if on face we're to
accept
your bigotry out of context.
First of all, your "explanations" are absolute babbling. I seriously
doubt even you could understand them if you went back a read them from
the standpoint of someone trying to figure out what in ***** you were
talking about.
Using vulgarity is a low down and ugly way to communicate regardless of skin
color. Calling you a ***** for using it, without knowing yours hardly makes
me a racist. It does how ever demonstrate the character of the user.
Lots of words take on new meanings when used in context. That's the reason
you deny the context. You want exclusivity of the word so as to demean a
whole group of people.
Second, when you call someone a "*****", context has NOTHING to do
with it. "*****" is a racist slur. Under ANY circumstance. It is
un-christian, it is immoral.
I'm simply connecting the dots of 'character' to the most descriptive word
that comes close to describing people who try and degrade others with low
life vulgarity.
Context does have meaning, other wise we could use any group of words for
some 'relative' meaning.
More important, is because you refuse to stop using it, apologize and
recognize that word for what it is, proves beyond any doubt what a
thoroughly disgusting ***** you are.
That's how I feel about you.
You people that use vulgarity, potty talk, low life speak 'deserve' to be
called "*****".
Third, hiding behind a professed belief in biblical principles is the
biggest laugh we get from you around here. I'd be willing to bet you
haven't the fucking courage to show ANY credible religious person
(minister, pastor, rabbi, or cleric) whay you've written about
"niggers", "intermarriage", work ethic of blacks, your homophobia and
bigotry and be given a pat on the back
You're a disgusting bigot, Barta.
You know what YOU are, besides being a bigot
---------------------------------------------------------
"Unfrozen Caveman Politician Gore":
<CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
No one wants a foul mouthed ***** working for him, no matter
what skin he wears.
How true.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky " |
|
| Title: Re: More Charley Barta Twaddle-----But he's still a racist, bigot andhomophobe |
20 Feb 2005 09:31:49 PM |
|
|
CB wrote:
<Laff@Pajamaloon> wrote in message
news:l5n611dfosbc8a1136vbq4alm2d5jom71l@4ax.com...
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 01:06:36 -0500, "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
Unlike you, I do explain my beliefs in detail. Never have you been
courageous enough to get past posting a quote, as if on face we're to
accept
your bigotry out of context.
First of all, your "explanations" are absolute babbling. I seriously
doubt even you could understand them if you went back a read them from
the standpoint of someone trying to figure out what in ***** you were
talking about.
Using vulgarity is a low down and ugly way to communicate regardless of skin
color. Calling you a ***** for using it, without knowing yours hardly makes
me a racist. It does how ever demonstrate the character of the user.
Lots of words take on new meanings when used in context. That's the reason
you deny the context. You want exclusivity of the word so as to demean a
whole group of people.
Too bad for you the racist connotations of "*****" have NOT changed...
Second, when you call someone a "*****", context has NOTHING to do
with it. "*****" is a racist slur. Under ANY circumstance. It is
un-christian, it is immoral.
I'm simply connecting the dots of 'character' to the most descriptive word
that comes close to describing people who try and degrade others with low
life vulgarity.
Context does have meaning, other wise we could use any group of words for
some 'relative' meaning.
More important, is because you refuse to stop using it, apologize and
recognize that word for what it is, proves beyond any doubt what a
thoroughly disgusting ***** you are.
That's how I feel about you.
You people that use vulgarity, potty talk, low life speak 'deserve' to be
called "*****".
Third, hiding behind a professed belief in biblical principles is the
biggest laugh we get from you around here. I'd be willing to bet you
haven't the fucking courage to show ANY credible religious person
(minister, pastor, rabbi, or cleric) whay you've written about
"niggers", "intermarriage", work ethic of blacks, your homophobia and
bigotry and be given a pat on the back
You're a disgusting bigot, Barta.
You know what YOU are, besides being a bigot
---------------------------------------------------------
"Unfrozen Caveman Politician Gore":
<CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
No one wants a foul mouthed ***** working for him, no matter
what skin he wears.
How true.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Laff@Pajamaloon" |
|
| Title: You people-- 'deserve' to be clled *****. (Yep, Charly Barta still says it) |
16 Feb 2005 05:53:44 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:36:43 -0500, "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
You people that use vulgarity, potty talk, low life speak 'deserve' to be
called "*****".
---------------------------------------------------------
"Unfrozen Caveman Politician Gore":
<CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
I have employed hundreds if
not thousands of people. I know a ***** after just a
short time hearing him talk, work and complain.
.
|
|
|
| User: "CB" |
|
| Title: Re: You people-- 'deserve' to be clled *****. (Yep, Charly Barta still says it) |
16 Feb 2005 11:43:50 PM |
|
|
<Laff@Pajamaloon> wrote in message
news:q6n711li2u56vs35gafbnsmam8q2ol9eqm@4ax.com...
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:36:43 -0500, "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
You people
....having no idea what skin color you have but probably white...
that use vulgarity, potty talk, low life speak 'deserve' to be
called "*****".
---------------------------------------------------------
"Unfrozen Caveman Politician Gore":
<CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
I have employed hundreds if
not thousands of people. I know a ***** after just a
short time hearing him talk, work and complain.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Laff@Pajamaloon" |
|
| Title: "I know a ***** after just a shot time", CHARLEY BARTA CLAIMS |
17 Feb 2005 03:15:15 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 00:43:50 -0500, "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
---------------------------------------------------------
"Unfrozen Caveman Politician Gore":
<CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
I have employed hundreds if
not thousands of people. I know a ***** after just a
short time hearing him talk, work and complain.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
16 Feb 2005 08:29:57 AM |
|
|
In article <4212C363.39D1921B@hotmMOVEail.com> Rich Travsky <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> writes:
CB wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:420EA3D5.1D8907BC@hotmMOVEail.com...
{...}
It's hard to misinterpret "***** you *****" ...
The shoe sure fit that time, homey
This ugly shoe fits you:
To appose racial mixing is respecting race not putting it down. People are
different, in skin color and belief. We are not mutts like some mono-culture. - CB
Hey, I still find it refreshing that CB is whacking liberals for
promoting "mono-culturality" while the rest of the conservative
and/or the bigoted are cursing about liberals pushing "multi-
culturality".
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "CB" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
16 Feb 2005 10:22:26 AM |
|
|
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuvld5$90n$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <4212C363.39D1921B@hotmMOVEail.com> Rich Travsky <"
traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> writes:
CB wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:420EA3D5.1D8907BC@hotmMOVEail.com...
{...}
It's hard to misinterpret "***** you *****" ...
The shoe sure fit that time, homey
This ugly shoe fits you:
To appose racial mixing is respecting race not putting it down. People
are
different, in skin color and belief. We are not mutts like some
mono-culture. - CB
Hey, I still find it refreshing that CB is whacking liberals for
promoting "mono-culturality" while the rest of the conservative
and/or the bigoted are cursing about liberals pushing "multi-
culturality".
It's not mutually exclusive
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
16 Feb 2005 11:09:51 AM |
|
|
CB wrote:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuvld5$90n$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <4212C363.39D1921B@hotmMOVEail.com> Rich Travsky <"
traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> writes:
CB wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:420EA3D5.1D8907BC@hotmMOVEail.com...
{...}
It's hard to misinterpret "***** you *****" ...
The shoe sure fit that time, homey
This ugly shoe fits you:
To appose racial mixing is respecting race not putting it down. People
are
different, in skin color and belief. We are not mutts like some
mono-culture. - CB
Hey, I still find it refreshing that CB is whacking liberals for
promoting "mono-culturality" while the rest of the conservative
and/or the bigoted are cursing about liberals pushing "multi-
culturality".
It's not mutually exclusive
"mono cultural" and "multi cultural" aren't mutually exclusive? Explain how.
RT
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
