| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
24 Jan 2005 06:01:27 AM |
| Object: |
More fruti cakes |
In our email this moring
From : Doug Shannon [delete]
Sent : Sunday, January 23, 2005 8:18 PM
To : US
Subject : reversing seperation of church and state
Supreme Court Justice William Douglas Brag to his fellow lawyers at a
conference how he and his fellow justices turned the Constitution of the
United States on its head when they came up with this idea of "separation
of church and state". The United States foundation is based on the
teachings given at Mt. Sinai.
I would like to give a interpretation of some writings by a Jew concerning
the actions of man and the justice he will reap from those actions. Pay
particular attention to the last part of his writings. The very last part
of these writings you might find interesting to yourself how Christians
think. I believe everything here is found in the Koran. If not please write
back and tell me what you disagree with. I believe there is no New
Testament with out the Koran.
THREE STEPS TO THE DESTRUCTION OF A NATION
Hello
I wish to share with you what I have discovered in the Bible.
There are three steps to the destruction of a nation according to Paul an
apostle of Jesus Christ. If you think, it all makes sense in how we got to
be where we are and where we are going.
There are three steps to the destruction of a nation.
Romans 1, vs. 21 – 31
Step One:
For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave
thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts
were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise they became fools and
exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal
man and birds and animals and reptiles.
How does this compare to the environmental movement? Have we not made the
things in the environment gods?
The curse God put on this nation for this act is:
Therefore God gave them over in sinful desires of their hearts to sexual
impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another.
Hence the sexual revolution began:
Step Two:
They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created
things rather than the Creator - who is forever praised. Amen
Do we not worship our technology; the thing we have created?
The curse God put on this nation for this act is:
Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women
exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men
also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for
one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in
themselves the due penalty for perversion.
Hence the gay movement.
Why is the life expectancy for a gay person only 42? Men die of aids and
women die from alcohol abuse or suicide.
Step Three:
Furthermore since they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge
of God, he gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to not
be done.
Did we not remove God from the minds of our children, the next generation
of parents. leaders of this great nation when the Supreme Court
misinterpreted the Constitution of the United States, by stating anyone who
is an employee in the public school can not educate children in the ten
commandments.
The curse God put on this nation for this act is:
They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and
depravity, They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice, They
are gossips, slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they
invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; they are senseless,
faithless, heartless, ruthless. Although they know God's righteous decree
that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to
these very things but also approve of those who practice them.
So where do you think we are in this timetable?
Step Four:
There is no step four. This is it. We are on the last rung of the ladder.
Beyond this there is no hope for our nation. We are destine as a country to
become a weak, deprived, hungry third power unless we start climbing up
this ladder.
First step is to acknowledge God and make His ways our ways.
We need to take a stand for God and His Son Jesus Christ and receive into
our hearts the Holy Spirit, the comforter. Pray that God will bless us and
curse our enemies to the point they will cry out for mercy from God.
Through this act they will be saved and then we will be brothers and
sisters through Jesus.
The main reason we have gone down this path of destruction is because of
the Christians. I stand accused along with my brothers and sisters. As the
Supreme Court was taking prayer out of schools the Christian stood by and
let it happen. We were so occupied with the Vietnam War to be concerned
with what really matters. Was the Vietnam War a distraction put into play
so that this tragedy could take place? I don't know. I do know that the
Christians should have demanded U.S. Congress put the Supreme Court into
check a long time ago. We have removed God from the minds of our Children.
What hope do we have for this once great country?
I hope that your eyes will be open to what is happening. It is possible for
congress to overrule the separation of church and state. If a nation wide
petition could be started then this would bring up the debate to the
forefront and with prayer and God's blessing then the separation of church
and state could be a thing of the pass.
All praise to God the father of Abraham
Thank-you
*******************************************************************************************
.
|
|
| User: "Shadow Walker" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
14 Feb 2005 12:04:49 PM |
|
|
CB wrote:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqiom$mjn$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <cumar7$bv5$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB" <CB@prayforme.com>
writes:
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:csgs015qe42t6fnj73unj3aef27ot3dsoo@4ax.com...
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuii4c$94r$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
Really? You don't think public schools should teach history?
Jumping to the extreme is a sure sign of a failed argument.
That's a very
novel viewpoint, I must say.
What would be novel is to teach history without a Liberal slant
impugning
the motives of our founders and that of 'separation.
Since part of teaching history is to teach the motivations of the
people who did what they did, one DOES have to teach their
motivations, which are seldom simple, and not always salutary.
If you only teach an idealized perversion of history, you don't learn
the lessons of history, and instead are teaching myth and ancestor
worship.
One man's honor for ancestry is another man's curse because of squandered
lessons on living.
Liberalism is progressive in blocking out the past
So sayeth the man who gets very squirmy when I suggest that we
do indeed teach history -- all of our history, the good and the bad.
With labels that admit that "content on the therory of evolution is not to
be eccepted as fact"?
Education and the Judiciary are the last refuge of social construction. Not
for long. Enjoy it while you can.
Isn't disconcerting to see the "alleged" Christians Hell bent on
tearing down social construction ?!!!
Those kind of Christians kind of reminds me of the
clown in Stephen Kings "It".
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
14 Feb 2005 12:07:51 PM |
|
|
In article <cuqo7k$168$1@news.onecall.net> Shadow Walker <shadow@onecall.net> writes:
CB wrote:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqiom$mjn$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <cumar7$bv5$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB" <CB@prayforme.com>
writes:
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:csgs015qe42t6fnj73unj3aef27ot3dsoo@4ax.com...
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuii4c$94r$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
Really? You don't think public schools should teach history?
Jumping to the extreme is a sure sign of a failed argument.
That's a very
novel viewpoint, I must say.
What would be novel is to teach history without a Liberal slant
impugning
the motives of our founders and that of 'separation.
Since part of teaching history is to teach the motivations of the
people who did what they did, one DOES have to teach their
motivations, which are seldom simple, and not always salutary.
If you only teach an idealized perversion of history, you don't learn
the lessons of history, and instead are teaching myth and ancestor
worship.
One man's honor for ancestry is another man's curse because of squandered
lessons on living.
Liberalism is progressive in blocking out the past
So sayeth the man who gets very squirmy when I suggest that we
do indeed teach history -- all of our history, the good and the bad.
With labels that admit that "content on the therory of evolution is not to
be eccepted as fact"?
Education and the Judiciary are the last refuge of social construction. Not
for long. Enjoy it while you can.
Isn't disconcerting to see the "alleged" Christians Hell bent on
tearing down social construction ?!!!
Those kind of Christians kind of reminds me of the
clown in Stephen Kings "It".
In all It's various guises and manifestations?
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
14 Feb 2005 11:22:00 AM |
|
|
In article <cuqk15$aqr$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> writes:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqiom$mjn$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <cumar7$bv5$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB" <CB@prayforme.com>
writes:
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:csgs015qe42t6fnj73unj3aef27ot3dsoo@4ax.com...
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuii4c$94r$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
Really? You don't think public schools should teach history?
Jumping to the extreme is a sure sign of a failed argument.
That's a very
novel viewpoint, I must say.
What would be novel is to teach history without a Liberal slant
impugning
the motives of our founders and that of 'separation.
Since part of teaching history is to teach the motivations of the
people who did what they did, one DOES have to teach their
motivations, which are seldom simple, and not always salutary.
If you only teach an idealized perversion of history, you don't learn
the lessons of history, and instead are teaching myth and ancestor
worship.
One man's honor for ancestry is another man's curse because of squandered
lessons on living.
Liberalism is progressive in blocking out the past
So sayeth the man who gets very squirmy when I suggest that we
do indeed teach history -- all of our history, the good and the bad.
With labels that admit that "content on the therory of evolution is not to
be eccepted as fact"?
I'm attempting to disucss how history might better be taught, to make
us a more responsible people.
You are attempting to change the subject.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "CB" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
14 Feb 2005 12:38:46 PM |
|
|
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqmno$2gs$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <cuqk15$aqr$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB" <CB@prayforme.com>
writes:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqiom$mjn$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <cumar7$bv5$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB"
<CB@prayforme.com>
writes:
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:csgs015qe42t6fnj73unj3aef27ot3dsoo@4ax.com...
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuii4c$94r$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
Really? You don't think public schools should teach history?
Jumping to the extreme is a sure sign of a failed argument.
That's a very
novel viewpoint, I must say.
What would be novel is to teach history without a Liberal slant
impugning
the motives of our founders and that of 'separation.
Since part of teaching history is to teach the motivations of the
people who did what they did, one DOES have to teach their
motivations, which are seldom simple, and not always salutary.
If you only teach an idealized perversion of history, you don't
learn
the lessons of history, and instead are teaching myth and ancestor
worship.
One man's honor for ancestry is another man's curse because of
squandered
lessons on living.
Liberalism is progressive in blocking out the past
So sayeth the man who gets very squirmy when I suggest that we
do indeed teach history -- all of our history, the good and the bad.
With labels that admit that "content on the therory of evolution is not
to
be eccepted as fact"?
I'm attempting to disucss how history might better be taught, to make
us a more responsible people.
You are attempting to change the subject.
The subject was honoring the culture and historical ethnicity of
individuals, as in respecting racial difference. Liberals (mu
interpretation) seek to blur the races in order to make us all mutts in some
mono-culture, without a history and without lineage.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob LeChevalier" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
14 Feb 2005 03:11:17 PM |
|
|
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
The subject was honoring the culture and historical ethnicity of
individuals, as in respecting racial difference. Liberals (mu
interpretation) seek to blur the races in order to make us all mutts in some
mono-culture, without a history and without lineage.
It is impossible to "make us mutts" because we ARE mutts. I've been
working on genealogies for several people for the last few months, and
EVERY SINGLE ONE has been a product of at least three different
nationalities - and that is assuming that there weren't any unrecorded
cuckolds in the nest.
So, in my case, should I care more about the history and culture of my
French ancestors, my Italian ancestors, my German ancestors, or my
Russian ancestors, or one of the other nationalities (in just the last
four generations so far) - and my dad and grandfather each had
siblings that married into at least 3 more nationalities that I know
of?
lojbab
--
lojbab
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky " |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
15 Feb 2005 10:09:37 PM |
|
|
Bob LeChevalier wrote:
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
The subject was honoring the culture and historical ethnicity of
individuals, as in respecting racial difference. Liberals (mu
interpretation) seek to blur the races in order to make us all mutts in some
mono-culture, without a history and without lineage.
It is impossible to "make us mutts" because we ARE mutts. I've been
working on genealogies for several people for the last few months, and
EVERY SINGLE ONE has been a product of at least three different
nationalities - and that is assuming that there weren't any unrecorded
cuckolds in the nest.
So, in my case, should I care more about the history and culture of my
French ancestors, my Italian ancestors, my German ancestors, or my
Russian ancestors, or one of the other nationalities (in just the last
four generations so far) - and my dad and grandfather each had
siblings that married into at least 3 more nationalities that I know
of?
And I've got Irish, German, Eastern European, Spainish...
But CB is only interested in what's white...
RT
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Big Nickles" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
16 Feb 2005 02:15:36 PM |
|
|
- Charles M Seaton (21 Dec 1994)
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote in message
news:cuqr7p$fof$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com...
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqmno$2gs$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <cuqk15$aqr$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB"
<CB@prayforme.com> writes:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqiom$mjn$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <cumar7$bv5$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB"
<CB@prayforme.com>
writes:
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:csgs015qe42t6fnj73unj3aef27ot3dsoo@4ax.com...
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuii4c$94r$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
Really? You don't think public schools should teach history?
Jumping to the extreme is a sure sign of a failed argument.
That's a very
novel viewpoint, I must say.
What would be novel is to teach history without a Liberal slant
impugning
the motives of our founders and that of 'separation.
Since part of teaching history is to teach the motivations of the
people who did what they did, one DOES have to teach their
motivations, which are seldom simple, and not always salutary.
If you only teach an idealized perversion of history, you don't
learn
the lessons of history, and instead are teaching myth and ancestor
worship.
One man's honor for ancestry is another man's curse because of
squandered
lessons on living.
Liberalism is progressive in blocking out the past
So sayeth the man who gets very squirmy when I suggest that we
do indeed teach history -- all of our history, the good and the bad.
With labels that admit that "content on the therory of evolution is not
to
be eccepted as fact"?
I'm attempting to disucss how history might better be taught, to make
us a more responsible people.
You are attempting to change the subject.
The subject was honoring the culture and historical ethnicity of
individuals, as in respecting racial difference. Liberals (mu
interpretation) seek to blur the races in order to make us all mutts in
some mono-culture, without a history and without lineage.
You're assuming that your white Christian ethnicity wasn't a product of
other ancient races interbreeding to form caucasians.
And your religion, definately a product of a few gods and bibles
interbreeding to form what you have now.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky " |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
15 Feb 2005 09:59:24 PM |
|
|
CB wrote:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqmno$2gs$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <cuqk15$aqr$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB" <CB@prayforme.com>
writes:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqiom$mjn$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <cumar7$bv5$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB"
<CB@prayforme.com>
writes:
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:csgs015qe42t6fnj73unj3aef27ot3dsoo@4ax.com...
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuii4c$94r$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
Really? You don't think public schools should teach history?
Jumping to the extreme is a sure sign of a failed argument.
That's a very
novel viewpoint, I must say.
What would be novel is to teach history without a Liberal slant
impugning
the motives of our founders and that of 'separation.
Since part of teaching history is to teach the motivations of the
people who did what they did, one DOES have to teach their
motivations, which are seldom simple, and not always salutary.
If you only teach an idealized perversion of history, you don't
learn
the lessons of history, and instead are teaching myth and ancestor
worship.
One man's honor for ancestry is another man's curse because of
squandered
lessons on living.
Liberalism is progressive in blocking out the past
So sayeth the man who gets very squirmy when I suggest that we
do indeed teach history -- all of our history, the good and the bad.
With labels that admit that "content on the therory of evolution is not
to
be eccepted as fact"?
I'm attempting to disucss how history might better be taught, to make
us a more responsible people.
You are attempting to change the subject.
The subject was honoring the culture and historical ethnicity of
individuals, as in respecting racial difference. Liberals (mu
interpretation) seek to blur the races in order to make us all mutts in some
mono-culture, without a history and without lineage.
White supremacist code words. CB is against interracial dating.
RT
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
16 Feb 2005 08:32:17 AM |
|
|
In article <4212C51C.9CCCF994@hotmMOVEail.com> Rich Travsky <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> writes:
CB wrote:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqmno$2gs$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
{...}
I'm attempting to disucss how history might better be taught, to make
us a more responsible people.
You are attempting to change the subject.
The subject was honoring the culture and historical ethnicity of
individuals, as in respecting racial difference. Liberals (mu
interpretation) seek to blur the races in order to make us all mutts in some
mono-culture, without a history and without lineage.
White supremacist code words. CB is against interracial dating.
Uh. oh... what if some of us are going a step beyond interracially
dating, and are dating an interracial?
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky " |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
20 Feb 2005 09:28:24 PM |
|
|
Cary Kittrell wrote:
In article <4212C51C.9CCCF994@hotmMOVEail.com> Rich Travsky <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> writes:
CB wrote:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqmno$2gs$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
{...}
I'm attempting to disucss how history might better be taught, to make
us a more responsible people.
You are attempting to change the subject.
The subject was honoring the culture and historical ethnicity of
individuals, as in respecting racial difference. Liberals (mu
interpretation) seek to blur the races in order to make us all mutts in some
mono-culture, without a history and without lineage.
White supremacist code words. CB is against interracial dating.
Uh. oh... what if some of us are going a step beyond interracially
dating, and are dating an interracial?
Take THAT, CB...
RT
.
|
|
|
| User: "CB" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
21 Feb 2005 06:07:14 AM |
|
|
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:42195558.C8A8BBD5@hotmMOVEail.com...
Cary Kittrell wrote:
In article <4212C51C.9CCCF994@hotmMOVEail.com> Rich Travsky <"
traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> writes:
CB wrote:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqmno$2gs$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
{...}
I'm attempting to disucss how history might better be taught, to
make
us a more responsible people.
You are attempting to change the subject.
The subject was honoring the culture and historical ethnicity of
individuals, as in respecting racial difference. Liberals (mu
interpretation) seek to blur the races in order to make us all mutts
in some
mono-culture, without a history and without lineage.
White supremacist code words. CB is against interracial dating.
Uh. oh... what if some of us are going a step beyond interracially
dating, and are dating an interracial?
That's your right and my your lives be filled with happiness
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
23 Feb 2005 08:54:14 AM |
|
|
In article <cvcitk$s9p$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> writes:
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:42195558.C8A8BBD5@hotmMOVEail.com...
Cary Kittrell wrote:
In article <4212C51C.9CCCF994@hotmMOVEail.com> Rich Travsky <"
traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> writes:
CB wrote:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqmno$2gs$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
{...}
I'm attempting to disucss how history might better be taught, to
make
us a more responsible people.
You are attempting to change the subject.
The subject was honoring the culture and historical ethnicity of
individuals, as in respecting racial difference. Liberals (mu
interpretation) seek to blur the races in order to make us all mutts
in some
mono-culture, without a history and without lineage.
White supremacist code words. CB is against interracial dating.
Uh. oh... what if some of us are going a step beyond interracially
dating, and are dating an interracial?
That's your right and my your lives be filled with happiness
Thank you kindly. And thus far, deliriously so.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gray Shockley" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
16 Feb 2005 09:00:14 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:32:17 -0600, Cary Kittrell wrote
In article <4212C51C.9CCCF994@hotmMOVEail.com> Rich Travsky <"
traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> writes:
CB wrote:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqmno$2gs$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
{...}
I'm attempting to disucss how history might better be taught, to make
us a more responsible people.
You are attempting to change the subject.
The subject was honoring the culture and historical ethnicity of
individuals, as in respecting racial difference. Liberals (mu
interpretation) seek to blur the races in order to make us all mutts in
some
mono-culture, without a history and without lineage.
White supremacist code words. CB is against interracial dating.
Uh. oh... what if some of us are going a step beyond interracially
dating, and are dating an interracial?
-- cary
One style point added to your total.
+ gray
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
14 Feb 2005 12:56:38 PM |
|
|
In article <cuqr7p$fof$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> writes:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqmno$2gs$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <cuqk15$aqr$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB" <CB@prayforme.com>
writes:
{...}
Liberalism is progressive in blocking out the past
So sayeth the man who gets very squirmy when I suggest that we
do indeed teach history -- all of our history, the good and the bad.
With labels that admit that "content on the therory of evolution is not
to be eccepted as fact"?
I'm attempting to disucss how history might better be taught, to make
us a more responsible people.
You are attempting to change the subject.
The subject was honoring the culture and historical ethnicity of
individuals, as in respecting racial difference. Liberals (mu
interpretation) seek to blur the races in order to make us all mutts in some
mono-culture, without a history and without lineage.
So, liberals are now guilty of "mono-culturism"? Well, that's novel.
Usually we're being cursed for promoting multi-culturism.
In any event, culture and ethnicity is precisely one of the things
I propose teaching. History when I went to high school was
very close to 100% white man's history. I suggest we teach,
among other things, the stories of the slave, the coolie, and
the Indian as well. I can only assume from what you say, above,
that you could have no objection to that.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "CB" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
14 Feb 2005 01:23:33 PM |
|
|
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqs96$h0e$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <cuqr7p$fof$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB" <CB@prayforme.com>
writes:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqmno$2gs$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <cuqk15$aqr$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB"
<CB@prayforme.com>
writes:
{...}
Liberalism is progressive in blocking out the past
So sayeth the man who gets very squirmy when I suggest that we
do indeed teach history -- all of our history, the good and the bad.
With labels that admit that "content on the therory of evolution is
not
to be eccepted as fact"?
I'm attempting to disucss how history might better be taught, to make
us a more responsible people.
You are attempting to change the subject.
The subject was honoring the culture and historical ethnicity of
individuals, as in respecting racial difference. Liberals (mu
interpretation) seek to blur the races in order to make us all mutts in
some
mono-culture, without a history and without lineage.
So, liberals are now guilty of "mono-culturism"? Well, that's novel.
Usually we're being cursed for promoting multi-culturism.
It's one of the the subliminal messages of free love.
Another one 'is', if ya can't love the one you want, love the one you're
with.
Aren't you the one calling me a resist for respecting other ethnicities
right to 'free association', procreating in respect to their ancestry?
Me thinks you protest to much
In any event, culture and ethnicity is precisely one of the things
I propose teaching. History when I went to high school was
very close to 100% white man's history. I suggest we teach,
among other things, the stories of the slave, the coolie, and
the Indian as well. I can only assume from what you say, above,
that you could have no objection to that.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "CB" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
14 Feb 2005 01:26:13 PM |
|
|
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote in message
news:cuqtro$iig$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com...
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqs96$h0e$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <cuqr7p$fof$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB"
<CB@prayforme.com> writes:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqmno$2gs$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <cuqk15$aqr$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB"
<CB@prayforme.com>
writes:
{...}
Liberalism is progressive in blocking out the past
So sayeth the man who gets very squirmy when I suggest that we
do indeed teach history -- all of our history, the good and the
bad.
With labels that admit that "content on the therory of evolution is
not
to be eccepted as fact"?
I'm attempting to disucss how history might better be taught, to make
us a more responsible people.
You are attempting to change the subject.
The subject was honoring the culture and historical ethnicity of
individuals, as in respecting racial difference. Liberals (mu
interpretation) seek to blur the races in order to make us all mutts in
some
mono-culture, without a history and without lineage.
So, liberals are now guilty of "mono-culturism"? Well, that's novel.
Usually we're being cursed for promoting multi-culturism.
It's one of the the subliminal messages of free love.
Another one 'is', if ya can't love the one you want, love the one you're
with.
Aren't you the one calling me a resist for respecting other ethnicities
right to 'free association', procreating in respect to their ancestry?
Me thinks you protest to much
In any event, culture and ethnicity is precisely one of the things
I propose teaching. History when I went to high school was
very close to 100% white man's history. I suggest we teach,
among other things, the stories of the slave, the coolie, and
the Indian as well. I can only assume from what you say, above,
that you could have no objection to that.
No objection as long as you understand there are consequences to teaching
'potentially resist views
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky " |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
15 Feb 2005 10:03:20 PM |
|
|
CB wrote:
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote in message
news:cuqtro$iig$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com...
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqs96$h0e$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <cuqr7p$fof$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB"
<CB@prayforme.com> writes:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqmno$2gs$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <cuqk15$aqr$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB"
<CB@prayforme.com>
writes:
{...}
Liberalism is progressive in blocking out the past
So sayeth the man who gets very squirmy when I suggest that we
do indeed teach history -- all of our history, the good and the
bad.
With labels that admit that "content on the therory of evolution is
not
to be eccepted as fact"?
I'm attempting to disucss how history might better be taught, to make
us a more responsible people.
You are attempting to change the subject.
The subject was honoring the culture and historical ethnicity of
individuals, as in respecting racial difference. Liberals (mu
interpretation) seek to blur the races in order to make us all mutts in
some
mono-culture, without a history and without lineage.
So, liberals are now guilty of "mono-culturism"? Well, that's novel.
Usually we're being cursed for promoting multi-culturism.
It's one of the the subliminal messages of free love.
Another one 'is', if ya can't love the one you want, love the one you're
with.
Aren't you the one calling me a resist for respecting other ethnicities
right to 'free association', procreating in respect to their ancestry?
Me thinks you protest to much
In any event, culture and ethnicity is precisely one of the things
I propose teaching. History when I went to high school was
very close to 100% white man's history. I suggest we teach,
among other things, the stories of the slave, the coolie, and
the Indian as well. I can only assume from what you say, above,
that you could have no objection to that.
No objection as long as you understand there are consequences to teaching
'potentially resist views
Does anyone know what "potentially resist views" are?
RT
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
14 Feb 2005 02:22:31 PM |
|
|
In article <cuqu0o$imi$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> writes:
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote in message
news:cuqtro$iig$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com...
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqs96$h0e$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <cuqr7p$fof$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB"
<CB@prayforme.com> writes:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqmno$2gs$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <cuqk15$aqr$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB"
<CB@prayforme.com>
writes:
{...}
Liberalism is progressive in blocking out the past
So sayeth the man who gets very squirmy when I suggest that we
do indeed teach history -- all of our history, the good and the
bad.
With labels that admit that "content on the therory of evolution is
not
to be eccepted as fact"?
I'm attempting to disucss how history might better be taught, to make
us a more responsible people.
You are attempting to change the subject.
The subject was honoring the culture and historical ethnicity of
individuals, as in respecting racial difference. Liberals (mu
interpretation) seek to blur the races in order to make us all mutts in
some
mono-culture, without a history and without lineage.
So, liberals are now guilty of "mono-culturism"? Well, that's novel.
Usually we're being cursed for promoting multi-culturism.
It's one of the the subliminal messages of free love.
Another one 'is', if ya can't love the one you want, love the one you're
with.
Aren't you the one calling me a resist for respecting other ethnicities
right to 'free association', procreating in respect to their ancestry?
Me thinks you protest to much
In any event, culture and ethnicity is precisely one of the things
I propose teaching. History when I went to high school was
very close to 100% white man's history. I suggest we teach,
among other things, the stories of the slave, the coolie, and
the Indian as well. I can only assume from what you say, above,
that you could have no objection to that.
No objection as long as you understand there are consequences to teaching
'potentially resist views
Well, you have me there, I must admit. I have no idea of the
consequences of teaching "'potentially resist views", because
I do not have a clue as to what a "'potentially resist view"
might consist of.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky " |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
15 Feb 2005 10:08:10 PM |
|
|
Cary Kittrell wrote:
In article <cuqu0o$imi$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> writes:
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote in message
news:cuqtro$iig$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com...
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqs96$h0e$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <cuqr7p$fof$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB"
<CB@prayforme.com> writes:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqmno$2gs$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <cuqk15$aqr$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB"
<CB@prayforme.com>
writes:
{...}
Liberalism is progressive in blocking out the past
So sayeth the man who gets very squirmy when I suggest that we
do indeed teach history -- all of our history, the good and the
bad.
With labels that admit that "content on the therory of evolution is
not
to be eccepted as fact"?
I'm attempting to disucss how history might better be taught, to make
us a more responsible people.
You are attempting to change the subject.
The subject was honoring the culture and historical ethnicity of
individuals, as in respecting racial difference. Liberals (mu
interpretation) seek to blur the races in order to make us all mutts in
some
mono-culture, without a history and without lineage.
So, liberals are now guilty of "mono-culturism"? Well, that's novel.
Usually we're being cursed for promoting multi-culturism.
It's one of the the subliminal messages of free love.
Another one 'is', if ya can't love the one you want, love the one you're
with.
Aren't you the one calling me a resist for respecting other ethnicities
right to 'free association', procreating in respect to their ancestry?
Me thinks you protest to much
In any event, culture and ethnicity is precisely one of the things
I propose teaching. History when I went to high school was
very close to 100% white man's history. I suggest we teach,
among other things, the stories of the slave, the coolie, and
the Indian as well. I can only assume from what you say, above,
that you could have no objection to that.
No objection as long as you understand there are consequences to teaching
'potentially resist views
Well, you have me there, I must admit. I have no idea of the
consequences of teaching "'potentially resist views", because
I do not have a clue as to what a "'potentially resist view"
might consist of.
Neither does he.
RT
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
16 Feb 2005 08:37:29 AM |
|
|
In article <4212C72A.2C352A00@hotmMOVEail.com> Rich Travsky <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> writes:
Cary Kittrell wrote:
In article <cuqu0o$imi$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> writes:
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote in message
news:cuqtro$iig$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com...
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqs96$h0e$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
{...}
In any event, culture and ethnicity is precisely one of the things
I propose teaching. History when I went to high school was
very close to 100% white man's history. I suggest we teach,
among other things, the stories of the slave, the coolie, and
the Indian as well. I can only assume from what you say, above,
that you could have no objection to that.
No objection as long as you understand there are consequences to teaching
'potentially resist views
Well, you have me there, I must admit. I have no idea of the
consequences of teaching "'potentially resist views", because
I do not have a clue as to what a "'potentially resist view"
might consist of.
Neither does he.
I'm guessing that he meant "potentially racist"?...
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "CB" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
16 Feb 2005 10:38:05 AM |
|
|
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuvlr9$9hq$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <4212C72A.2C352A00@hotmMOVEail.com> Rich Travsky <"
traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> writes:
Cary Kittrell wrote:
In article <cuqu0o$imi$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB"
<CB@prayforme.com> writes:
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote in message
news:cuqtro$iig$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com...
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqs96$h0e$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
{...}
In any event, culture and ethnicity is precisely one of the things
I propose teaching. History when I went to high school was
very close to 100% white man's history. I suggest we teach,
among other things, the stories of the slave, the coolie, and
the Indian as well. I can only assume from what you say, above,
that you could have no objection to that.
No objection as long as you understand there are consequences to
teaching
'potentially resist views
Well, you have me there, I must admit. I have no idea of the
consequences of teaching "'potentially resist views", because
I do not have a clue as to what a "'potentially resist view"
might consist of.
Neither does he.
I'm guessing that he meant "potentially racist"?...
Give the man (heh) a cigar
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky " |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
20 Feb 2005 09:33:31 PM |
|
|
CB wrote:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuvlr9$9hq$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <4212C72A.2C352A00@hotmMOVEail.com> Rich Travsky <"
traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> writes:
Cary Kittrell wrote:
In article <cuqu0o$imi$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB"
<CB@prayforme.com> writes:
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote in message
news:cuqtro$iig$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com...
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqs96$h0e$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
{...}
In any event, culture and ethnicity is precisely one of the things
I propose teaching. History when I went to high school was
very close to 100% white man's history. I suggest we teach,
among other things, the stories of the slave, the coolie, and
the Indian as well. I can only assume from what you say, above,
that you could have no objection to that.
No objection as long as you understand there are consequences to
teaching
'potentially resist views
Well, you have me there, I must admit. I have no idea of the
consequences of teaching "'potentially resist views", because
I do not have a clue as to what a "'potentially resist view"
might consist of.
Neither does he.
I'm guessing that he meant "potentially racist"?...
Give the man (heh) a cigar
<sarcasm>
Oh of course that's what you meant.
</sarcasm>
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky " |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
20 Feb 2005 09:29:43 PM |
|
|
Cary Kittrell wrote:
In article <4212C72A.2C352A00@hotmMOVEail.com> Rich Travsky <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> writes:
Cary Kittrell wrote:
In article <cuqu0o$imi$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> writes:
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote in message
news:cuqtro$iig$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com...
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqs96$h0e$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
{...}
In any event, culture and ethnicity is precisely one of the things
I propose teaching. History when I went to high school was
very close to 100% white man's history. I suggest we teach,
among other things, the stories of the slave, the coolie, and
the Indian as well. I can only assume from what you say, above,
that you could have no objection to that.
No objection as long as you understand there are consequences to teaching
'potentially resist views
Well, you have me there, I must admit. I have no idea of the
consequences of teaching "'potentially resist views", because
I do not have a clue as to what a "'potentially resist view"
might consist of.
Neither does he.
I'm guessing that he meant "potentially racist"?...
His illiteracy would be worse than originally thought...
RT
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky " |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
15 Feb 2005 10:02:43 PM |
|
|
CB wrote:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqs96$h0e$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <cuqr7p$fof$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB" <CB@prayforme.com>
writes:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqmno$2gs$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <cuqk15$aqr$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB"
<CB@prayforme.com>
writes:
{...}
Liberalism is progressive in blocking out the past
So sayeth the man who gets very squirmy when I suggest that we
do indeed teach history -- all of our history, the good and the bad.
With labels that admit that "content on the therory of evolution is
not
to be eccepted as fact"?
I'm attempting to disucss how history might better be taught, to make
us a more responsible people.
You are attempting to change the subject.
The subject was honoring the culture and historical ethnicity of
individuals, as in respecting racial difference. Liberals (mu
interpretation) seek to blur the races in order to make us all mutts in
some
mono-culture, without a history and without lineage.
So, liberals are now guilty of "mono-culturism"? Well, that's novel.
Usually we're being cursed for promoting multi-culturism.
It's one of the the subliminal messages of free love.
It is? Explain how. (this oughta be good...)
Another one 'is', if ya can't love the one you want, love the one you're
with.
Aren't you the one calling me a resist for respecting other ethnicities
right to 'free association', procreating in respect to their ancestry?
Me thinks you protest to much
In any event, culture and ethnicity is precisely one of the things
I propose teaching. History when I went to high school was
very close to 100% white man's history. I suggest we teach,
among other things, the stories of the slave, the coolie, and
the Indian as well. I can only assume from what you say, above,
that you could have no objection to that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
16 Feb 2005 08:35:36 AM |
|
|
In article <4212C5E3.E137281B@hotmMOVEail.com> Rich Travsky <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> writes:
CB wrote:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqs96$h0e$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
{...}
So, liberals are now guilty of "mono-culturism"? Well, that's novel.
Usually we're being cursed for promoting multi-culturism.
It's one of the the subliminal messages of free love.
It is? Explain how. (this oughta be good...)
Hey, I think I finally figured that one out (the meaning
of some of CB's phrases, like the solutions to math
problems, sometimes come to me hours later).
I do believe he's denouncing the idea that you might get
involved with someone who, while present and
available, is not <wink> <wink> <nudge> <nudge>
"appropriate" to someone of your genetic endowment.
You think?
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
14 Feb 2005 02:21:11 PM |
|
|
In article <cuqtro$iig$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> writes:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqs96$h0e$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <cuqr7p$fof$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB" <CB@prayforme.com>
writes:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuqmno$2gs$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <cuqk15$aqr$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB"
<CB@prayforme.com>
writes:
{...}
Liberalism is progressive in blocking out the past
So sayeth the man who gets very squirmy when I suggest that we
do indeed teach history -- all of our history, the good and the bad.
With labels that admit that "content on the therory of evolution is
not
to be eccepted as fact"?
I'm attempting to disucss how history might better be taught, to make
us a more responsible people.
You are attempting to change the subject.
The subject was honoring the culture and historical ethnicity of
individuals, as in respecting racial difference. Liberals (mu
interpretation) seek to blur the races in order to make us all mutts in
some
mono-culture, without a history and without lineage.
So, liberals are now guilty of "mono-culturism"? Well, that's novel.
Usually we're being cursed for promoting multi-culturism.
It's one of the the subliminal messages of free love.
After re-reading that three times, I feel compelled to observe,
and I say this in all sincerity: "Huh?"
Another one 'is', if ya can't love the one you want, love the one you're
with.
Sound advice, that one.
Aren't you the one calling me a resist for respecting other ethnicities
right to 'free association', procreating in respect to their ancestry?
Me? No.
You're free to show where I said any such thing. Google is
your friend. You may attach the link here ----->
Me thinks you protest to much
Methinks you're flailing wildly, making up any trash you can to
avoid answering my question. But let's show that I was wrong,
and you're merely easily distracted, shall we? In the interest
of doing so, I'll present my proposal for your commment yet
once more:
In any event, culture and ethnicity is precisely one of the things
I propose teaching. History when I went to high school was
very close to 100% white man's history. I suggest we teach,
among other things, the stories of the slave, the coolie, and
the Indian as well. I can only assume from what you say, above,
that you could have no objection to that.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
14 Feb 2005 12:37:52 PM |
|
|
In article <cumar7$bv5$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> writes:
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:csgs015qe42t6fnj73unj3aef27ot3dsoo@4ax.com...
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuii4c$94r$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
Really? You don't think public schools should teach history?
Jumping to the extreme is a sure sign of a failed argument.
That's a very
novel viewpoint, I must say.
What would be novel is to teach history without a Liberal slant impugning
the motives of our founders and that of 'separation.
Since part of teaching history is to teach the motivations of the
people who did what they did, one DOES have to teach their
motivations, which are seldom simple, and not always salutary.
If you only teach an idealized perversion of history, you don't learn
the lessons of history, and instead are teaching myth and ancestor
worship.
One man's honor for ancestry is another man's curse because of squandered
lessons on living.
I can't recall Jesus saying anything like that. Can you?
59 And he said unto another, Follow me. But he said, Lord, suffer me
first to go and bury my father.
60 Jesus said unto him, Let the dead bury their dead: but go thou and
preach the kingdom of God.
[Luke 9]
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Curly Surmudgeon" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
14 Feb 2005 05:30:18 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 20:34:30 -0500, CB wrote:
------------snip------------
Liberalism is progressive in blocking out the past so as to deny the
inalienable rights bestowed from our Creator.
You really need to invest in a good dictionary:
lib·er·al·ism
n.
1. The state or quality of being liberal.
2.
1. A political theory founded on the natural goodness of humans and the autonomy of the individual and favoring civil and political liberties, government by law with the consent of the governed, and protection from arbitrary authority.
2. often Liberalism The tenets or policies of a Liberal party.
3. An economic theory in favor of laissez-faire, the free market, and the gold standard.
4. Liberalism
1. A 19th-century Protestant movement that favored free intellectual inquiry, stressed the ethical and humanitarian content of Christianity, and de-emphasized dogmatic theology.
2. A 19th-century Roman Catholic movement that favored political democracy and ecclesiastical reform but was theologically orthodox.
Where do you see a mention of your 'creator'? Mine is under the
definition of "Mother."
-- Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.curlysurmudgeon.com http://mp3.dubyaspeak.com/internets.mp3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
14 Feb 2005 10:28:38 AM |
|
|
In article <cuk9at$lld$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> writes:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cuii4c$94r$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <cuhiff$s0o$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB" <CB@prayforme.com>
writes:
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cudqua$lcb$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <cudcu6$lth$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB"
<CB@prayforme.com> writes:
{...}
Take a man's heritage away, his identity becomes as "mutted" as any
other
Liberal relitive enlightenment
So would you agree that we ought to teach ALL of our collective
heritage in schools, lest we do not know who we are?
Nope, that's a personal thing, family has been doing that 'job' for
millennia.
Really? You don't think public schools should teach history?
Jumping to the extreme is a sure sign of a failed argument.
Hey, you're the one who, when I discussed teaching history, said
that this was a personal and family thing. If you don't want me
to take what you say at face value, you might want to put a
little note in to that effect.
That's a very
novel viewpoint, I must say.
What would be novel is to teach history without a Liberal slant impugning
the motives of our founders and that of 'separation.
Are things that bad? I must need some educating here. Please, be
so kind as to list, say, six examples of either textbooks or
specific lessons by specific teachers which you feel impugned
the motives of our founders.
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
When ever government (schools) gets involved in teaching culture somehow
political correctness 'is' invoked to push American culture aside to
accommodate cultures from other lands.
What ever happened to America first? Divide and conquer, that's what
Is "America First" a very Christian way of viewing things?
Let's call it a union thing
"It is, indeed, of little consequence who governs us, if they sincerely and
zealously cherish the principles of union and republicanism."
--Thomas Jefferson
This being the Thomas Jefferson who thought much of what the Bible
attributes to Jesus was false, and who thought that Paul corrupted
the rest?
Hint: charity was among the teachings of Jesus that Jefferson approved
of, and therefore thought genuine.
I'd
be very interested to see you support "Me and mine first, everybody else
second" Biblically.
Charity begins with family
"Charity begins with the family"? You're basing the teachings of
Jesus, yes? This Jesus?:
If anyone comes to me and does not hate his father, mother, wife,
children, brothers, sisters, and himself as well, he cannot be my
disciple. Whoever does not bear his cross and follow me cannot be my
disciple.
and spreads out to include strangers. Some
Then what was the parable of the Good Samaritan all about?
strangers have family that's abandon them or have given up on them for
reasons only they know. Some people ya just can't help, like leading a camel
to water but not able to make him drink.
That sounds like just about as secular a view point as you can
possibly get.
No, just patriotic
Again, I see not one word in the Bible praising patriotism (unless you're
an Israeli). That's your very own form of secular humanism, which you're
overlaying on a religion which does not teach it.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky " |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES |
12 Feb 2005 06:39:58 PM |
|
|
CB wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <" traRvEsky"@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:4209A22F.CE7EC446@hotmMOVEail.com...
Gray Shockley wrote:
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 06:14:13 -0600, CB wrote
(in article <cuaaeq$r7$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com>):
nig·ger
n. Offensive Slang
1.
1. Used as a disparaging term for a Black person: "You can only be
destroyed by believing that you really are what the white world calls
a
*****" (James Baldwin).
2. Used as a disparaging term for a member of any dark-skinned
people.
2. Used as a disparaging term for a member of any socially,
economically, or politically deprived group of people: "Gun owners are
the
new niggers... of society" (John Aquilino).
There ya go
No, PorkOver.
Notice: >> n. Offensive Slang
You are saying, in essence: "You know how
bad niggers are? Well, you're just as bad.
You can claim all day that you're not a racist
but when a lot of people on this n/g see
"CB", we see Charlie Barta in a Klan robe and
dunce cap.
Classic CB:
People can marry interracially I don't really give a *****...but. If I ran
an
private college I would want all the students to honor the cultural,
ancestral and lineage of their own proud people. It's not to say people
don't fall in love naturally, they do. To appose racial mixing is
respecting
race not putting it down. People are different, in skin color and belief.
We
are not mutts like some mono-culture.
"mutts" - where might have you seen this sort of talk, eh?
From Liberal moral relative equality, where nothing means anything of worth,
nothing is honored and nothing has virtue. The "mutt" is the Liberal
equivalent of the ideal man. No identity, no ancestral lineage, no self
respect.
What hogwash. CB wants whites to stay white. The classic white supremacist
position. Interracial marriage - which CB must also oppose since he opposes
interracial dating - does not mean a loss of identity, lineage, or self respect.
Only insecure bigots would feel that way.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
