| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
24 Jan 2005 12:01:27 PM |
| Object: |
More fruti cakes |
In our email this moring
From : Doug Shannon [delete]
Sent : Sunday, January 23, 2005 8:18 PM
To : US
Subject : reversing seperation of church and state
Supreme Court Justice William Douglas Brag to his fellow lawyers at a
conference how he and his fellow justices turned the Constitution of the
United States on its head when they came up with this idea of "separation
of church and state". The United States foundation is based on the
teachings given at Mt. Sinai.
I would like to give a interpretation of some writings by a Jew concerning
the actions of man and the justice he will reap from those actions. Pay
particular attention to the last part of his writings. The very last part
of these writings you might find interesting to yourself how Christians
think. I believe everything here is found in the Koran. If not please write
back and tell me what you disagree with. I believe there is no New
Testament with out the Koran.
THREE STEPS TO THE DESTRUCTION OF A NATION
Hello
I wish to share with you what I have discovered in the Bible.
There are three steps to the destruction of a nation according to Paul an
apostle of Jesus Christ. If you think, it all makes sense in how we got to
be where we are and where we are going.
There are three steps to the destruction of a nation.
Romans 1, vs. 21 – 31
Step One:
For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave
thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts
were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise they became fools and
exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal
man and birds and animals and reptiles.
How does this compare to the environmental movement? Have we not made the
things in the environment gods?
The curse God put on this nation for this act is:
Therefore God gave them over in sinful desires of their hearts to sexual
impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another.
Hence the sexual revolution began:
Step Two:
They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created
things rather than the Creator - who is forever praised. Amen
Do we not worship our technology; the thing we have created?
The curse God put on this nation for this act is:
Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women
exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men
also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for
one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in
themselves the due penalty for perversion.
Hence the gay movement.
Why is the life expectancy for a gay person only 42? Men die of aids and
women die from alcohol abuse or suicide.
Step Three:
Furthermore since they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge
of God, he gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to not
be done.
Did we not remove God from the minds of our children, the next generation
of parents. leaders of this great nation when the Supreme Court
misinterpreted the Constitution of the United States, by stating anyone who
is an employee in the public school can not educate children in the ten
commandments.
The curse God put on this nation for this act is:
They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and
depravity, They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice, They
are gossips, slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they
invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; they are senseless,
faithless, heartless, ruthless. Although they know God's righteous decree
that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to
these very things but also approve of those who practice them.
So where do you think we are in this timetable?
Step Four:
There is no step four. This is it. We are on the last rung of the ladder.
Beyond this there is no hope for our nation. We are destine as a country to
become a weak, deprived, hungry third power unless we start climbing up
this ladder.
First step is to acknowledge God and make His ways our ways.
We need to take a stand for God and His Son Jesus Christ and receive into
our hearts the Holy Spirit, the comforter. Pray that God will bless us and
curse our enemies to the point they will cry out for mercy from God.
Through this act they will be saved and then we will be brothers and
sisters through Jesus.
The main reason we have gone down this path of destruction is because of
the Christians. I stand accused along with my brothers and sisters. As the
Supreme Court was taking prayer out of schools the Christian stood by and
let it happen. We were so occupied with the Vietnam War to be concerned
with what really matters. Was the Vietnam War a distraction put into play
so that this tragedy could take place? I don't know. I do know that the
Christians should have demanded U.S. Congress put the Supreme Court into
check a long time ago. We have removed God from the minds of our Children.
What hope do we have for this once great country?
I hope that your eyes will be open to what is happening. It is possible for
congress to overrule the separation of church and state. If a nation wide
petition could be started then this would bring up the debate to the
forefront and with prayer and God's blessing then the separation of church
and state could be a thing of the pass.
All praise to God the father of Abraham
Thank-you
*******************************************************************************************
.
|
|
| User: "Larry Heath" |
|
| Title: Re: More fruti cakes |
24 Jan 2005 04:28:01 PM |
|
|
<buckeye-ELO@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:bso9v0t70t08n033eps8j29nqjojd9a6ig@4ax.com...
In our email this moring
From : Doug Shannon [delete]
Sent : Sunday, January 23, 2005 8:18 PM
To : US
Subject : reversing seperation of church and state
Supreme Court Justice William Douglas Brag to his fellow lawyers at a
conference how he and his fellow justices turned the Constitution of the
United States on its head when they came up with this idea of "separation
of church and state". The United States foundation is based on the
teachings given at Mt. Sinai.
I would like to give a interpretation of some writings by a Jew concerning
the actions of man and the justice he will reap from those actions. Pay
particular attention to the last part of his writings. The very last part
of these writings you might find interesting to yourself how Christians
think. I believe everything here is found in the Koran. If not please
write
back and tell me what you disagree with. I believe there is no New
Testament with out the Koran.
THREE STEPS TO THE DESTRUCTION OF A NATION
Hello
I wish to share with you what I have discovered in the Bible.
What you or someone else says they have discovered in the Christian bible or
as I like to call it the BBoB ( the Basic Book of ***** or alternatively
the Big Bale of *****, pronounced bob), is of no consequence to me or I
would assume most of the people in this group, alt.atheism, as it has been
discredited in a myriad of way. As far as the koran goes it is also a load
of crap as well, even more exquisitely convoluted crap than the Christian
bible, again with many different versions and sources none of which can be
accurately traced to the supposed source.
Irrelevance is your mandate.
Later Larry
Major clip of other crap!
.
|
|
|
| User: "CB" |
|
| Title: Re: More fruti cakes |
25 Jan 2005 07:16:56 PM |
|
|
"Larry Heath" <lgheath@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Q-2dnTwQB8mMv2jcRVn-2A@comcast.com...
<buckeye-ELO@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:bso9v0t70t08n033eps8j29nqjojd9a6ig@4ax.com...
In our email this moring
From : Doug Shannon [delete]
Sent : Sunday, January 23, 2005 8:18 PM
To : US
Subject : reversing seperation of church and state
Supreme Court Justice William Douglas Brag to his fellow lawyers at a
conference how he and his fellow justices turned the Constitution of the
United States on its head when they came up with this idea of "separation
of church and state". The United States foundation is based on the
teachings given at Mt. Sinai.
I would like to give a interpretation of some writings by a Jew
concerning
the actions of man and the justice he will reap from those actions. Pay
particular attention to the last part of his writings. The very last part
of these writings you might find interesting to yourself how Christians
think. I believe everything here is found in the Koran. If not please
write
back and tell me what you disagree with. I believe there is no New
Testament with out the Koran.
THREE STEPS TO THE DESTRUCTION OF A NATION
Hello
I wish to share with you what I have discovered in the Bible.
What you or someone else says they have discovered in the Christian bible
or as I like to call it the BBoB ( the Basic Book of ***** or
alternatively the Big Bale of *****, pronounced bob), is of no
consequence to me or I would assume most of the people in this group,
alt.atheism, as it has been discredited in a myriad of way. As far as the
koran goes it is also a load of crap as well, even more exquisitely
convoluted crap than the Christian bible, again with many different
versions and sources none of which can be accurately traced to the
supposed source.
Irrelevance is your mandate.
Later Larry
Major clip of other crap!
So you believe something came from nothing. A farse even the brightest
scientist could not intellectually explain. Proving your ignorance and
commiting you to the void from which something came.
--
CB
Proverbs 26:1
As snow in summer, and as rain in harvest, so honour is not seemly for a
fool.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Larry Heath" |
|
| Title: Re: More fruti cakes |
26 Jan 2005 12:35:59 AM |
|
|
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote in message
news:ct65v9$7am$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com...
"Larry Heath" <lgheath@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Q-2dnTwQB8mMv2jcRVn-2A@comcast.com...
<buckeye-ELO@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:bso9v0t70t08n033eps8j29nqjojd9a6ig@4ax.com...
In our email this moring <-(morning sp?)
From : Doug Shannon [delete]
Sent : Sunday, January 23, 2005 8:18 PM
To : US
Subject : reversing seperation <-(separation sp?) of church and state
Supreme Court Justice William Douglas Brag to his fellow lawyers at a
conference how he and his fellow justices turned the Constitution of the
United States on its head when they came up with this idea of
"separation
of church and state". The United States foundation is based on the
teachings given at Mt. Sinai.
I would like to give a interpretation of some writings by a Jew
concerning
the actions of man and the justice he will reap from those actions. Pay
particular attention to the last part of his writings. The very last
part
of these writings you might find interesting to yourself how Christians
think. I believe everything here is found in the Koran. If not please
write
back and tell me what you disagree with. I believe there is no New
Testament with out the Koran.
THREE STEPS TO THE DESTRUCTION OF A NATION
Hello
I wish to share with you what I have discovered in the Bible.
What you or someone else says they have discovered in the Christian bible
or as I like to call it the BBoB ( the Basic Book of ***** or
alternatively the Big Bale of *****, pronounced bob), is of no
consequence to me or I would assume most of the people in this group,
alt.atheism, as it has been discredited in a myriad of way. As far as the
koran goes it is also a load of crap as well, even more exquisitely
convoluted crap than the Christian bible, again with many different
versions and sources none of which can be accurately traced to the
supposed source.
Irrelevance is your mandate.
Later Larry
Major clip of other crap!
So you believe something came from nothing.
No, what I believe is that the BBoB is what you believe, with very little
verifiable documented proof as to the veracity of what is in the BBoB.
I believe that science in many areas has at the current time come up with a
vast number of cogent reproducible reasons for what and why a very large
number of things happen in this universe, that does not require the use of
the BBoB or recourse to deities, the god did it thing theists often resort
to. If my understanding is correct, that includes much of the last 13.7
billion years (+/- 200 million years), back to a time 1x10^-34 second after
the start of our universe. We at this time do not have the necessary energy
levels necessary to check theories further back than this time.
A farse <- (farce sp?) even the brightest scientist could not
intellectually explain.
On the basis of BBoB you say that it is a farce to speculate that we and all
the universe came into being out of nothing, when in fact that is what some
of the most innovative scientist are in deed coming to think may be the
case. Have you read and or tried to understand any information on string
theory high energy physics or the like?
Proving your ignorance and commiting <- (committing sp?) you to the void
from which something came.
My ignorance, what a laugh, you base everything on the BBoB and appear to
dismiss the millions upon millions of learned reproducible peer reviewed
papers in thousands upon thousands of libraries in the thousands upon
thousands of universities the world over. You have the unmitigated gaul to
call me ignorant, when the BBoB is your primary source of knowledge. I think
it is you that needs to widen your base of knowledge by reading more widely
in something besides the BBoB. I guess the BBoB dosen't have any brane's
does it.
--
CB
Proverbs 26:1
As snow in summer, and as rain in harvest, so honour <-(honor sp?) is not
seemly for a fool.
Rave on poor fool, rave on.
Later Larry
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Shadow Walker" |
|
| Title: Re: More fruti cakes |
26 Jan 2005 01:05:37 AM |
|
|
CB wrote:
"Larry Heath" <lgheath@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Q-2dnTwQB8mMv2jcRVn-2A@comcast.com...
Major clip of other crap!
So you believe something came from nothing. A farse even the brightest
scientist could not intellectually explain. Proving your ignorance and
commiting you to the void from which something came.
YOU obviously don't know ***** about Quantum Mechanics,
among other things.
All the time, from out of nowhere, particles spring into
existence, at the same moment as an anti-particle, springs
into existence... then they rush towards each other, collide,
and disappear again.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: More fruti cakes |
25 Jan 2005 07:38:57 PM |
|
|
In article <ct65v9$7am$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> writes:
"Larry Heath" <lgheath@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Q-2dnTwQB8mMv2jcRVn-2A@comcast.com...
{...}
What you or someone else says they have discovered in the Christian bible
or as I like to call it the BBoB ( the Basic Book of ***** or
alternatively the Big Bale of *****, pronounced bob), is of no
consequence to me or I would assume most of the people in this group,
alt.atheism, as it has been discredited in a myriad of way. As far as the
koran goes it is also a load of crap as well, even more exquisitely
convoluted crap than the Christian bible, again with many different
versions and sources none of which can be accurately traced to the
supposed source.
Irrelevance is your mandate.
Later Larry
Major clip of other crap!
So you believe something came from nothing. A farse even the brightest
scientist could not intellectually explain. Proving your ignorance and
commiting you to the void from which something came.
Um, why? If the sum of gravitational potential energy, integrated
over the universe, matches the sum of m*c-squared, again integraged
over the universe, then the net sum is zero, and no conversation
laws are violated.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Carol Lee Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: More fruti cakes |
26 Jan 2005 03:48:58 AM |
|
|
In article <ct65v9$7am$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> writes:
So you believe something came from nothing. A farse even the brightest
scientist could not intellectually explain. Proving your ignorance and
commiting you to the void from which something came.
An even bigger farse: talking snakes, talking donkeys, walking on water,
resurrection and changing water into wine.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: More fruti cakes |
24 Jan 2005 02:17:21 PM |
|
|
wrote:
In our email this moring
From : Doug Shannon [delete]
Sent : Sunday, January 23, 2005 8:18 PM
To : US
Subject : reversing seperation of church and state
Supreme Court Justice William Douglas Brag to his fellow lawyers at a
conference how he and his fellow justices turned the Constitution of the
United States on its head when they came up with this idea of "separation
of church and state". The United States foundation is based on the
teachings given at Mt. Sinai.
Bollocks.
--
Jez
'Realism is seductive because once you have accepted the reasonable
notion that you should base your actions on reality, you are too often
led to accept, without much questioning, someone else's version of what
that reality is. It is a crucial act of independent thinking to be
skeptical of someone else's description of reality.'-
Howard Zinn
NFS Underground2, Americas Army And MOH-PA
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Shadow Walker" |
|
| Title: Re: More fruti cakes |
24 Jan 2005 02:00:53 PM |
|
|
wrote:
In our email this moring
From : Doug Shannon [delete]
Sent : Sunday, January 23, 2005 8:18 PM
To : US
Subject : reversing seperation of church and state
Really, -is- there any difference between the Xian nutters,
and the Islamic ones ?
Supreme Court Justice William Douglas Brag to his fellow lawyers at a
conference how he and his fellow justices turned the Constitution of the
United States on its head when they came up with this idea of "separation
of church and state". The United States foundation is based on the
teachings given at Mt. Sinai.
Whoa nelly. Break with reality, news at 11.
I would like to give a interpretation of some writings by a Jew concerning
the actions of man and the justice he will reap from those actions. Pay
particular attention to the last part of his writings. The very last part
of these writings you might find interesting to yourself how Christians
think. I believe everything here is found in the Koran. If not please write
back and tell me what you disagree with. I believe there is no New
Testament with out the Koran.
Well, thats news to about 1 billion Xians.
THREE STEPS TO THE DESTRUCTION OF A NATION
Hello
I wish to share with you what I have discovered in the Bible.
There are three steps to the destruction of a nation according to Paul an
apostle of Jesus Christ. If you think, it all makes sense in how we got to
be where we are and where we are going.
There are three steps to the destruction of a nation.
Romans 1, vs. 21 – 31
Step One:
For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave
thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts
were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise they became fools and
exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal
man and birds and animals and reptiles.
How does this compare to the environmental movement? Have we not made the
things in the environment gods?
No, we haven't. But when you run out of clean water,
and air, it won't be long after you can tell God all
about it.. first hand.
Think on it.
The curse God put on this nation for this act is:
Therefore God gave them over in sinful desires of their hearts to sexual
impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another.
Hence the sexual revolution began:
Step Two:
They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created
things rather than the Creator - who is forever praised. Amen
Do we not worship our technology; the thing we have created?
No, we don't. We throw it out as soon as the newest
one comes out. No worship whatsoever.
The curse God put on this nation for this act is:
Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women
exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men
also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for
one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in
themselves the due penalty for perversion.
Hence the gay movement.
Pardon me, but Gays are nothing new. They have been around as long
as history. Nice try.
Why is the life expectancy for a gay person only 42? Men die of aids and
women die from alcohol abuse or suicide.
Got a cite to back that ?
Didn't think so.
Step Three:
Furthermore since they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge
of God, he gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to not
be done.
Did we not remove God from the minds of our children, the next generation
of parents. leaders of this great nation when the Supreme Court
misinterpreted the Constitution of the United States, by stating anyone who
is an employee in the public school can not educate children in the ten
commandments.
No, we didn't.
The curse God put on this nation for this act is:
They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and
depravity, They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice, They
are gossips, slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they
invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; they are senseless,
faithless, heartless, ruthless. Although they know God's righteous decree
that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to
these very things but also approve of those who practice them.
So where do you think we are in this timetable?
Oh... About two judges away from being committed, is where I see you.
Step Four:
There is no step four. This is it. We are on the last rung of the ladder.
Beyond this there is no hope for our nation. We are destine as a country to
become a weak, deprived, hungry third power unless we start climbing up
this ladder.
You got that backwards, that is what we will become if you lunatics
are allowed to run our Country, as well as Iraq. There isn't a
Theocracy that -isn't- third world.
First step is to acknowledge God and make His ways our ways.
Make -Her- ways, your ways. ;)
We need to take a stand for God and His Son Jesus Christ and receive into
our hearts the Holy Spirit, the comforter. Pray that God will bless us and
curse our enemies to the point they will cry out for mercy from God.
Through this act they will be saved and then we will be brothers and
sisters through Jesus.
I'll save a schizophrenic break, for last, thanks.
The main reason we have gone down this path of destruction is because of
the Christians. I stand accused along with my brothers and sisters. As the
Supreme Court was taking prayer out of schools the Christian stood by and
let it happen. We were so occupied with the Vietnam War to be concerned
with what really matters. Was the Vietnam War a distraction put into play
so that this tragedy could take place? I don't know. I do know that the
Christians should have demanded U.S. Congress put the Supreme Court into
check a long time ago. We have removed God from the minds of our Children.
What hope do we have for this once great country?
Yeah, if we can get rid of the last of you Goat killers, and
put educated men of Science in charge, there will still be hope.
I hope that your eyes will be open to what is happening. It is possible for
congress to overrule the separation of church and state. If a nation wide
petition could be started then this would bring up the debate to the
forefront and with prayer and God's blessing then the separation of church
and state could be a thing of the pass.
All praise to God the father of Abraham
Thank-you
*******************************************************************************************
Can anyone tell the Islamic nutters from the Xian nutters?
The line is starting to blur...
.
|
|
|
| User: "CB" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement to Evil because of moral relativity |
26 Jan 2005 05:41:11 AM |
|
|
"Shadow Walker" <shadow@onecall.net> wrote in message
news:ct2v61$1p8$1@news.onecall.net...
buckeye-ELO@nospam.net wrote:
In our email this moring
From : Doug Shannon [delete]
Sent : Sunday, January 23, 2005 8:18 PM
To : US
Subject : reversing seperation of church and state
Really, -is- there any difference between the Xian nutters,
and the Islamic ones ?
With that little gem of moral relative inequality, the party of corruption
sinks further into the spider hole of obsolescence.
Supreme Court Justice William Douglas Brag to his fellow lawyers at a
conference how he and his fellow justices turned the Constitution of the
United States on its head when they came up with this idea of "separation
of church and state". The United States foundation is based on the
teachings given at Mt. Sinai.
Whoa nelly. Break with reality, news at 11.
I would like to give a interpretation of some writings by a Jew
concerning
the actions of man and the justice he will reap from those actions. Pay
particular attention to the last part of his writings. The very last part
of these writings you might find interesting to yourself how Christians
think. I believe everything here is found in the Koran. If not please
write
back and tell me what you disagree with. I believe there is no New
Testament with out the Koran.
Well, thats news to about 1 billion Xians.
The Koran offers no grace or salvation.
THREE STEPS TO THE DESTRUCTION OF A NATION
Hello
I wish to share with you what I have discovered in the Bible.
There are three steps to the destruction of a nation according to Paul an
apostle of Jesus Christ. If you think, it all makes sense in how we got
to
be where we are and where we are going.
There are three steps to the destruction of a nation.
Romans 1, vs. 21 – 31
Step One:
For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave
thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts
were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise they became fools and
exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like
mortal
man and birds and animals and reptiles.
How does this compare to the environmental movement? Have we not made the
things in the environment gods?
No, we haven't. But when you run out of clean water,
and air, it won't be long after you can tell God all
about it.. first hand.
Think on it.
The world is without end.
The curse God put on this nation for this act is:
Therefore God gave them over in sinful desires of their hearts to sexual
impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another.
Hence the sexual revolution began:
Step Two:
They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served
created
things rather than the Creator - who is forever praised. Amen
Do we not worship our technology; the thing we have created?
No, we don't. We throw it out as soon as the newest
one comes out. No worship whatsoever.
So we continently thrust for something ever new, never reallty satisfied
with what we have?
I suppose that's good as far as compitition goes but ya know it's true in
the Liberal world when we see all forms of worship going on. That's what Ann
is speaking about in...
If there were a goofy cult that prescribed eating your own excrement,
liberals would ponder its
deeper meaning and treat it with respect.
--Ann Coulter
When Johnny Comes Slinking Home
FrontPageMagazine.com | December 13, 2001
The curse God put on this nation for this act is:
Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women
exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men
also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust
for
one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in
themselves the due penalty for perversion.
Hence the gay movement.
Pardon me, but Gays are nothing new. They have been around as long
as history. Nice try.
God created the matter in which science claims came out of nothing.
Homosexuals rebelled against natural affection, instead lusting after their
own flesh. A taboo at first, then familiarity replaced the sence of Wrong.
It seems natural after a while, comparing them selves to lowly beasts,
crawly things...
Kind of like Romans, Chapter 1, verse 21:
21Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God,
neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and
their foolish heart was darkened. 22Professing themselves to be wise,
they became fools, 23And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God
into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and
fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
Why is the life expectancy for a gay person only 42? Men die of aids and
women die from alcohol abuse or suicide.
Got a cite to back that ?
Didn't think so.
You know it's true.
Step Three:
Furthermore since they did not think it worthwhile to retain the
knowledge
of God, he gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to not
be done.
Did we not remove God from the minds of our children, the next generation
of parents. leaders of this great nation when the Supreme Court
misinterpreted the Constitution of the United States, by stating anyone
who
is an employee in the public school can not educate children in the ten
commandments.
No, we didn't.
I went to Catholic school in Omaha. I remember the lessons at St. Cecelia's.
Then we moved back to Florida and attended public skoo, not a thing about
God was taught.
The curse God put on this nation for this act is:
They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and
depravity, They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice, They
are gossips, slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful;
they
invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; they are
senseless,
faithless, heartless, ruthless. Although they know God's righteous decree
that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to
these very things but also approve of those who practice them.
So where do you think we are in this timetable?
The Olive tree (Israel became a nation in 42) has come back to life.
Watch Jack Van Impe Presents and you'll begin to understand.
http://www.jvim.com/
Oh... About two judges away from being committed, is where I see you.
Step Four:
There is no step four. This is it. We are on the last rung of the ladder.
Beyond this there is no hope for our nation. We are destine as a country
to
become a weak, deprived, hungry third power unless we start climbing up
this ladder.
You got that backwards, that is what we will become if you lunatics
are allowed to run our Country, as well as Iraq. There isn't a
Theocracy that -isn't- third world.
Hey, have you looked at the booming economy? Employment is at its lowest in
history! Cutting taxes and getting rid of Tom Daschle was the best thing for
America, second best was for Secular Humanists declaring war on everything
historically reverent. We the people have turned the wheel on Liberalism.
First step is to acknowledge God and make His ways our ways.
Make -Her- ways, your ways. ;)
We need to take a stand for God and His Son Jesus Christ and receive into
our hearts the Holy Spirit, the comforter. Pray that God will bless us
and
curse our enemies to the point they will cry out for mercy from God.
Through this act they will be saved and then we will be brothers and
sisters through Jesus.
I'll save a schizophrenic break, for last, thanks.
Your ego will be your downfall.
Humility, that fine sweet root, from which all Heavenly virtues shoot.
The main reason we have gone down this path of destruction is because of
the Christians. I stand accused along with my brothers and sisters. As
the
Supreme Court was taking prayer out of schools the Christian stood by and
let it happen. We were so occupied with the Vietnam War to be concerned
with what really matters. Was the Vietnam War a distraction put into play
so that this tragedy could take place? I don't know. I do know that the
Christians should have demanded U.S. Congress put the Supreme Court into
check a long time ago. We have removed God from the minds of our
Children.
What hope do we have for this once great country?
Yeah, if we can get rid of the last of you Goat killers, and
put educated men of Science in charge, there will still be hope.
It was the educational system that took out Biblical discipline only to
teach their is no Higher Ruling Authority above man. The consequence we've
seen at Columbine High School.
I hope that your eyes will be open to what is happening. It is possible
for
congress to overrule the separation of church and state. If a nation wide
petition could be started then this would bring up the debate to the
forefront and with prayer and God's blessing then the separation of
church
and state could be a thing of the pass.
All praise to God the father of Abraham
Thank-you
*******************************************************************************************
Can anyone tell the Islamic nutters from the Xian nutters?
The line is starting to blur...
You can always tell a Secular Humanist Lib by the way he rationalizes all
things as morally relitve, despite the beheadings, torture and rapes by
terrorists and their supporters.
We can also tell just how much Libs value life by the people the causes they
champion like abortion and fighting to keep the Butcher of Baghdad in power.
--
CB
"Neither philosophy, nor religion, nor morality, nor wisdom, nor
interest will ever govern nations or parties against their vanity,
their pride, their resentment or revenge, or their avarice or
ambition. Nothing but force and power and strength can restrain them."
--John Adams
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob LeChevalier" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement to Evil because of moral relativity |
26 Jan 2005 10:44:50 AM |
|
|
"CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
The Koran offers no grace or salvation.
Of course it does. Just not on exactly the same terms or basis that
Jesus Christ does.
How does this compare to the environmental movement? Have we not made the
things in the environment gods?
No, we haven't. But when you run out of clean water,
and air, it won't be long after you can tell God all
about it.. first hand.
Think on it.
The world is without end.
This one is, for you.
Did we not remove God from the minds of our children, the next generation
of parents. leaders of this great nation when the Supreme Court
misinterpreted the Constitution of the United States, by stating anyone
who
is an employee in the public school can not educate children in the ten
commandments.
No, we didn't.
I went to Catholic school in Omaha. I remember the lessons at St. Cecelia's.
Then we moved back to Florida and attended public skoo, not a thing about
God was taught.
Did attending public school remove God from your mind? If so, why
were your parents so incompetent and your memory so poor? What did
you do evenings, Saturdays, and of course Sundays? Putting new
information in isn't supposed to take out the old information. Adding
secular school isn't supposed to remove private religious study.
The curse God put on this nation for this act is:
They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and
depravity, They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice, They
are gossips, slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful;
they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; they are
senseless, faithless, heartless, ruthless. Although they know God's righteous decree
that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to
these very things but also approve of those who practice them.
We were like that long before there were public schools.
You got that backwards, that is what we will become if you lunatics
are allowed to run our Country, as well as Iraq. There isn't a
Theocracy that -isn't- third world.
Hey, have you looked at the booming economy?
It wasn't caused by people going to church. Indeed, it was probably
caused by people working on Sunday and other people going to the mall
to buy from them.
Employment is at its lowest in history!
Not hardly. Nor is unemployment.
Your ego will be your downfall.
So will yours. The difference is that he realizes that he displays
his ego, whereas you think you are being humble.
You can always tell a Secular Humanist Lib by the way he rationalizes all
things as morally relitve, despite the beheadings, torture and rapes by
terrorists and their supporters.
Christians have done the beheadings, the torture, the rapes, and the
terror. Indeed three of the four have been done by Americans in Iraq,
probably some of which claim to be Christians.
We can also tell just how much Libs value life by the people the causes they
champion like abortion
Women's freedom
and fighting to keep the Butcher of Baghdad in power.
Not many did that, and they didn't for long.
Opposing the method of removing him from power is not the same as
fighting to keep him in power.
lojbab
--
lojbab
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chess" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement to Evil because of moral relativity |
26 Jan 2005 10:47:30 AM |
|
|
Here is a couple of web site for G.W. Supporters
http://www.kontraband.com/show/show.asp?ID=1843
G.W. = Grand Wizard
http://www.wckkkk.com/
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement to Evil because of moral relativity |
26 Jan 2005 04:15:22 PM |
|
|
In article <ct7aho$3tl$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> writes:
"Shadow Walker" <shadow@onecall.net> wrote in message
news:ct2v61$1p8$1@news.onecall.net...
{...}
So where do you think we are in this timetable?
The Olive tree (Israel became a nation in 42) has come back to life.
Watch Jack Van Impe Presents and you'll begin to understand.
http://www.jvim.com/
Oh, I have, I have. Personally I find Jack to be quite an appealing
guy, with his boyish unabashed enthuiasm and the obvious pleasure
he takes in his work.
But considered purely as comedy, well... Gracie and Allen, Martin
and Lewis, Abbot and Costello, Jack and Rexella. A classic.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement to Evil because of moral relativity |
26 Jan 2005 04:16:53 PM |
|
|
In article <ct7aho$3tl$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com> "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> writes:
"Shadow Walker" <shadow@onecall.net> wrote in message news:ct2v61$1p8$1@news.onecall.net...
You got that backwards, that is what we will become if you lunatics
are allowed to run our Country, as well as Iraq. There isn't a
Theocracy that -isn't- third world.
Hey, have you looked at the booming economy? Employment is at its lowest in
history!
Well, you said it first...
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gray Shockley" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement to Evil because of moral relativity |
02 Feb 2005 05:40:20 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:41:11 -0600, CB wrote
(in article <ct7aho$3tl$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com>):
The Olive tree (Israel became a nation in 42) has come back to life.
Recognition of Israel as a state:
May 14, 1948
Gray Shockley
--------------------------
Calvin: These are interesting times.
We don't trust the government,
We don't trust the legal system,
We don't trust the media,
and we don't trust each other!
We've undermined all authority,
and with it, the basis for replacing it!
Hobbes: "Interesting" is a mild way of putting it.
Calvin: It's like a six-year-old's dream come true.
.
|
|
|
| User: "CB" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement to Evil because of moral relativity |
02 Feb 2005 05:48:27 AM |
|
|
"Gray Shockley" <grayshockley@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:0001HW.BE25C3E4000328CD16290F90@news.giganews.com...
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:41:11 -0600, CB wrote
(in article <ct7aho$3tl$1@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com>):
The Olive tree (Israel became a nation in 42) has come back to life.
Recognition of Israel as a state:
May 14, 1948
Congratulations
Gray Shockley
--------------------------
Calvin: These are interesting times.
We don't trust the government,
We don't trust the legal system,
We don't trust the media,
and we don't trust each other!
We've undermined all authority,
and with it, the basis for replacing it!
Hobbes: "Interesting" is a mild way of putting it.
Calvin: It's like a six-year-old's dream come true.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement to Evil because of moral relativity |
26 Jan 2005 06:55:52 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 00:41:11 -0500, "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
The Koran offers no grace or salvation.
How do you know that Christianity does?
(Ans: Because the Bible says)
Now then, Barta
Prove the Bible is true.
---------------------------------------------------------
"Unfrozen Caveman Politician Gore":
<CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
I have employed hundreds if
not thousands of people. I know a ***** after just a
short time hearing him talk, work and complain.
.
|
|
|
| User: "CB" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement to Evil because of moral relativity |
27 Jan 2005 05:27:58 AM |
|
|
<Archie-Leach@getit.com> wrote in message
news:lrpfv0dq323q9hrkcfab27rnpgj8ocasei@4ax.com...
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 00:41:11 -0500, "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
The Koran offers no grace or salvation.
How do you know that Christianity does?
(Ans: Because the Bible says)
Now then, Barta
Prove the Bible is true.
It explains where original matter came from, that's more than ant scientist
can. From there it's all about faith, unconditional love, striving to
please, confiction and grace.
All you have is death.
--
CB
"The First Continental Congress made its first act a prayer, the
beginning of a great tradition. We have then a lesson from the
founders of our land. That lesson is clear: That in the winning of
freedom and in the living of life, the first step is prayer."
--Ronald Reagan
---------------------------------------------------------
"Unfrozen Caveman Politician Gore":
<CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
I have employed hundreds if
not thousands of people. I know a ***** after just a
short time hearing him talk, work and complain.
That's why you'll never make "cashier"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky " |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement to Evil because of moral relativity |
30 Jan 2005 07:14:53 PM |
|
|
CB wrote:
<Archie-Leach@getit.com> wrote in message
news:lrpfv0dq323q9hrkcfab27rnpgj8ocasei@4ax.com...
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 00:41:11 -0500, "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
The Koran offers no grace or salvation.
How do you know that Christianity does?
(Ans: Because the Bible says)
Now then, Barta
Prove the Bible is true.
It explains where original matter came from, that's more than ant scientist
can. From there it's all about faith, unconditional love, striving to
please, confiction and grace.
All you have is death.
Where matter came from? LOL. Creationism - HAHAHAH!
The bible says grasshoppers have four legs - not unless you pull two of them
off. So much for using that book as a science text...
RT
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Shadow Walker" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement to Evil because of moral relativity |
27 Jan 2005 12:28:29 PM |
|
|
CB wrote:
<Archie-Leach@getit.com> wrote in message
news:lrpfv0dq323q9hrkcfab27rnpgj8ocasei@4ax.com...
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 00:41:11 -0500, "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
The Koran offers no grace or salvation.
How do you know that Christianity does?
(Ans: Because the Bible says)
Now then, Barta
Prove the Bible is true.
It explains where original matter came from, that's more than ant scientist
can.
Actually, it _doesn't_.
"IN the beginning, the spirit of god hovered over the waters..."
The water was already there.
From there it's all about faith, unconditional love, striving to
please, confiction and grace.
All you have is death.
That is profound, "All you -really- are selling is death."
_That_ summarizes Xianism.
.
|
|
|
| User: "CB" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement to Evil because of moral relativity |
27 Jan 2005 04:36:13 PM |
|
|
"Shadow Walker" <shadow@onecall.net> wrote in message
news:ctamr8$5qe$4@news.onecall.net...
CB wrote:
<Archie-Leach@getit.com> wrote in message
news:lrpfv0dq323q9hrkcfab27rnpgj8ocasei@4ax.com...
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 00:41:11 -0500, "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
The Koran offers no grace or salvation.
How do you know that Christianity does?
(Ans: Because the Bible says)
Now then, Barta
Prove the Bible is true.
It explains where original matter came from, that's more than ant
scientist can.
Actually, it _doesn't_.
"IN the beginning, the spirit of god hovered over the waters..."
I see what you mean, especially in verse 10...
10 And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the
waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.
The word "waters" often refers to either crowds, multitudes of people or
the saints in heaven.
In any event you read the Bible, lets pray you hear the knock on the door.
GENESIS CHAPTER 1
1 ¶ In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the
face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
3 ¶ And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light
from the darkness.
The water was already there.
I agree
From there it's all about faith, unconditional love, striving to please,
confiction and grace.
All you have is death.
That is profound, "All you -really- are selling is death."
_That_ summarizes Xianism.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky " |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement to Evil because of moral relativity |
30 Jan 2005 07:16:26 PM |
|
|
CB wrote:
"Shadow Walker" <shadow@onecall.net> wrote in message
news:ctamr8$5qe$4@news.onecall.net...
CB wrote:
<Archie-Leach@getit.com> wrote in message
news:lrpfv0dq323q9hrkcfab27rnpgj8ocasei@4ax.com...
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 00:41:11 -0500, "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
The Koran offers no grace or salvation.
How do you know that Christianity does?
(Ans: Because the Bible says)
Now then, Barta
Prove the Bible is true.
It explains where original matter came from, that's more than ant
scientist can.
Actually, it _doesn't_.
"IN the beginning, the spirit of god hovered over the waters..."
I see what you mean, especially in verse 10...
10 And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the
waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.
The word "waters" often refers to either crowds, multitudes of people or
the saints in heaven.
In any event you read the Bible, lets pray you hear the knock on the door.
GENESIS CHAPTER 1
1 ¶ In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the
face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
3 ¶ And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light
from the darkness.
Never happened. Sorry.
The water was already there.
I agree
Then where did the water come from? What was it resting in? All oceans rivers
lakes seas puddles have land underneath.
RT
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gray Shockley" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement to Evil because of moral relativity |
02 Feb 2005 05:25:09 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 13:16:26 -0600, Rich Travsky wrote
(in article <41FD328A.34617815@hotmMOVEail.com>):
CB wrote:
"Shadow Walker" <shadow@onecall.net> wrote in message
news:ctamr8$5qe$4@news.onecall.net...
CB wrote:
<Archie-Leach@getit.com> wrote in message
news:lrpfv0dq323q9hrkcfab27rnpgj8ocasei@4ax.com...
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 00:41:11 -0500, "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
The Koran offers no grace or salvation.
How do you know that Christianity does?
(Ans: Because the Bible says)
Now then, Barta
Prove the Bible is true.
It explains where original matter came from, that's more than ant
scientist can.
Actually, it _doesn't_.
"IN the beginning, the spirit of god hovered over the waters..."
I see what you mean, especially in verse 10...
10 And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the
waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.
The word "waters" often refers to either crowds, multitudes of people or
the saints in heaven.
In any event you read the Bible, lets pray you hear the knock on the door.
GENESIS CHAPTER 1
1 ¶ In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the
face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
3 ¶ And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light
from the darkness.
Never happened. Sorry.
The water was already there.
I agree
Then where did the water come from? What was it resting in? All oceans rivers
lakes seas puddles have land underneath.
RT
You see, there were these turtles . . . . . . .
++ Gray //
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement to Evil because of moral relativity |
02 Feb 2005 05:30:17 PM |
|
|
In article <0001HW.BE26691500231C9513900A10@news.giganews.com> writes:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 13:16:26 -0600, Rich Travsky wrote
(in article <41FD328A.34617815@hotmMOVEail.com>):
CB wrote:
"Shadow Walker" <shadow@onecall.net> wrote in message
news:ctamr8$5qe$4@news.onecall.net...
CB wrote:
<Archie-Leach@getit.com> wrote in message
news:lrpfv0dq323q9hrkcfab27rnpgj8ocasei@4ax.com...
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 00:41:11 -0500, "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
The Koran offers no grace or salvation.
How do you know that Christianity does?
(Ans: Because the Bible says)
Now then, Barta
Prove the Bible is true.
It explains where original matter came from, that's more than ant
scientist can.
Actually, it _doesn't_.
"IN the beginning, the spirit of god hovered over the waters..."
I see what you mean, especially in verse 10...
10 And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the
waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.
The word "waters" often refers to either crowds, multitudes of people or
the saints in heaven.
In any event you read the Bible, lets pray you hear the knock on the door.
GENESIS CHAPTER 1
1 ¶ In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the
face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
3 ¶ And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light
from the darkness.
Never happened. Sorry.
The water was already there.
I agree
Then where did the water come from? What was it resting in? All oceans rivers
lakes seas puddles have land underneath.
RT
You see, there were these turtles . . . . . . .
HERETIC! DEVILSPAWN! First the elephants, THEN the turtles.
You some kind of post-pachydermist, bub? Or maybe a pre-chelonianist?
We're keeping an eye on you...
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky " |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement to Evil because of moral relativity |
03 Feb 2005 06:51:15 AM |
|
|
Cary Kittrell wrote:
In article <0001HW.BE26691500231C9513900A10@news.giganews.com> writes:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 13:16:26 -0600, Rich Travsky wrote
(in article <41FD328A.34617815@hotmMOVEail.com>):
CB wrote:
"Shadow Walker" <shadow@onecall.net> wrote in message
news:ctamr8$5qe$4@news.onecall.net...
CB wrote:
<Archie-Leach@getit.com> wrote in message
news:lrpfv0dq323q9hrkcfab27rnpgj8ocasei@4ax.com...
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 00:41:11 -0500, "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
The Koran offers no grace or salvation.
How do you know that Christianity does?
(Ans: Because the Bible says)
Now then, Barta
Prove the Bible is true.
It explains where original matter came from, that's more than ant
scientist can.
Actually, it _doesn't_.
"IN the beginning, the spirit of god hovered over the waters..."
I see what you mean, especially in verse 10...
10 And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the
waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.
The word "waters" often refers to either crowds, multitudes of people or
the saints in heaven.
In any event you read the Bible, lets pray you hear the knock on the door.
GENESIS CHAPTER 1
1 ¶ In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the
face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
3 ¶ And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light
from the darkness.
Never happened. Sorry.
The water was already there.
I agree
Then where did the water come from? What was it resting in? All oceans rivers
lakes seas puddles have land underneath.
You see, there were these turtles . . . . . . .
HERETIC! DEVILSPAWN! First the elephants, THEN the turtles.
You some kind of post-pachydermist, bub? Or maybe a pre-chelonianist?
We're keeping an eye on you...
Keeping an eye on you both - there's only one turtle!
Now - to redeem your souls - what is the turtle swimming in?
RT
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gray Shockley" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement to Evil because of moral relativity |
03 Feb 2005 04:44:57 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:30:17 -0600, Cary Kittrell wrote
(in article <ctr2n9$6t$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu>):
In article <0001HW.BE26691500231C9513900A10@news.giganews.com>
grayshockley@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 13:16:26 -0600, Rich Travsky wrote
(in article <41FD328A.34617815@hotmMOVEail.com>):
CB wrote:
"Shadow Walker" <shadow@onecall.net> wrote in message
news:ctamr8$5qe$4@news.onecall.net...
CB wrote:
<Archie-Leach@getit.com> wrote in message
news:lrpfv0dq323q9hrkcfab27rnpgj8ocasei@4ax.com...
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 00:41:11 -0500, "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
The Koran offers no grace or salvation.
How do you know that Christianity does?
(Ans: Because the Bible says)
Now then, Barta
Prove the Bible is true.
It explains where original matter came from, that's more than ant
scientist can.
Actually, it _doesn't_.
"IN the beginning, the spirit of god hovered over the waters..."
I see what you mean, especially in verse 10...
10 And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of
the
waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.
The word "waters" often refers to either crowds, multitudes of people or
the saints in heaven.
In any event you read the Bible, lets pray you hear the knock on the door.
GENESIS CHAPTER 1
1 ¶ In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the
face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
3 ¶ And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light
from the darkness.
Never happened. Sorry.
The water was already there.
I agree
Then where did the water come from? What was it resting in? All oceans
rivers
lakes seas puddles have land underneath.
RT
You see, there were these turtles . . . . . . .
HERETIC! DEVILSPAWN! First the elephants, THEN the turtles.
You some kind of post-pachydermist, bub? Or maybe a pre-chelonianist?
We're keeping an eye on you...
-- cary
1st, 2nd or 3rd?
Or in the back of the head?
++ Gray //
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES "NIGGERS" |
27 Jan 2005 05:59:31 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:36:13 -0500, "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
I agree
You agree----what?
Who saw it?
You haven't managed to accept that the word "*****" is racist
How in ***** are you able to call something never witnessed--truth?
You don't seem to know the difference between "fact" and "fiction",
"belief", "Faith" and "truth".
---------------------------------------------------------
"Unfrozen Caveman Politician Gore":
<CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
No one wants a foul mouthed ***** working for him, no matter
what skin he wears.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gray Shockley" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES "NIGGERS" |
01 Feb 2005 09:45:46 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:59, wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:36:13 -0500, "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
I agree
You agree----what?
Who saw it?
You haven't managed to accept that the word "*****" is racist
How in ***** are you able to call something never witnessed--truth?
You don't seem to know the difference between "fact" and "fiction",
"belief", "Faith" and "truth".
Barta is just a reminder that the sign of the Ku Klux Klan
is a burning cross - they claim to be "Christian"
donchaknow.
And "Christian" Identity semi-claims to be "Christian"
although they, also, don't like to hear about that Jesus
guy.
Here's definition #1 from my 1994 edition of the _American
Heritage Dictionary_:
1.a. Used as a disparaging term for a Black
person: ³You can only be destroyed by
believing that you really are what the
white world calls a *****² (James
Baldwin). b. Used as a disparaging term
for a member of any dark-skinned people.
And that is the way it's going to be taken.
Any attempt to use the word in any context other than that
of definition and explanation is, pretty generally, going
to have to be used in a racist manner.
The times I've seen Charlie Barta use the word "*****",
it's as if he is using a naughty word when his parents
can't hear him; the forbidden joy of using a racist term in
a manner that he "thinks" won't be taken as racist.
Or, more accurately, a word that he uses to attract
attention to himself because he thinks people are going to
go along with his use of a term after he explains how he is
using the word.
There's just one little problem with that: it's racist no
matter how it's used.
When Charlie Barta uses the word, he's saying that the
person is //like// a "*****".
So it's Barta's racism coming through, no matter what.
If the boy doesn't want to be called a racist, he shouldn't
use racist terms.
The use of the word is racist and that's all there is too
it.
I can remember coming out of my part of the motor pool at
Fort Polk at quitting time and two black guys from the
motor mech section walking a few paces in front of me and
one using "*****" in his conversaion.
I did a "Tut, tut" at them and when they turned around, I
suggested that "If you use it, then it must be okay if I
use it. Right?"
One of them told me (out on a FTx months later) that there
had been all sorts of discussions about that in the
barracks and that the general consensus was that nobody,
mebbe, ought to be using the word.
The word is racist. It's always racist. If someone uses it
and it's not an "intellectual" (or whatever) discussion,
the person is a racist.
And anyone who uses the word degrades her/himself far more
than the person s/he is calling names.
Gray Shockley
--------------------------
grayshockley@gmail.com
http://www.compcomm.com/
Vicksburg, Mississippi US
---------------------------------------------------------
"Unfrozen Caveman Politician Gore":
<CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
No one wants a foul mouthed ***** working for him, no matter
what skin he wears.
.
|
|
|
| User: "CB" |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES "NIGGERS" |
02 Feb 2005 05:47:33 AM |
|
|
"Gray Shockley" <grayshockley@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:0001HW.BE2554AA000E741815FAF8A0@news.giganews.com...
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:59, wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:36:13 -0500, "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
I agree
You agree----what?
Who saw it?
You haven't managed to accept that the word "*****" is racist
How in ***** are you able to call something never witnessed--truth?
You don't seem to know the difference between "fact" and "fiction",
"belief", "Faith" and "truth".
Barta is just a reminder that the sign of the Ku Klux Klan
is a burning cross - they claim to be "Christian"
donchaknow.
And "Christian" Identity semi-claims to be "Christian"
although they, also, don't like to hear about that Jesus
guy.
Here's definition #1 from my 1994 edition of the _American
Heritage Dictionary_:
1.a. Used as a disparaging term for a Black
person: ³You can only be destroyed by
believing that you really are what the
white world calls a *****² (James
Baldwin). b. Used as a disparaging term
for a member of any dark-skinned people.
And that is the way it's going to be taken.
Any attempt to use the word in any context other than that
of definition and explanation is, pretty generally, going
to have to be used in a racist manner.
The times I've seen Charlie Barta use the word "*****",
it's as if he is using a naughty word when his parents
can't hear him; the forbidden joy of using a racist term in
a manner that he "thinks" won't be taken as racist.
Or, more accurately, a word that he uses to attract
attention to himself because he thinks people are going to
go along with his use of a term after he explains how he is
using the word.
There's just one little problem with that: it's racist no
matter how it's used.
When Charlie Barta uses the word, he's saying that the
person is //like// a "*****".
So it's Barta's racism coming through, no matter what.
If the boy doesn't want to be called a racist, he shouldn't
use racist terms.
The use of the word is racist and that's all there is too
it.
I can remember coming out of my part of the motor pool at
Fort Polk at quitting time and two black guys from the
motor mech section walking a few paces in front of me and
one using "*****" in his conversaion.
I did a "Tut, tut" at them and when they turned around, I
suggested that "If you use it, then it must be okay if I
use it. Right?"
One of them told me (out on a FTx months later) that there
had been all sorts of discussions about that in the
barracks and that the general consensus was that nobody,
mebbe, ought to be using the word.
The word is racist. It's always racist. If someone uses it
and it's not an "intellectual" (or whatever) discussion,
the person is a racist.
And anyone who uses the word degrades her/himself far more
than the person s/he is calling names.
What you say might be true 'if' I were to use it in racist context, which
you know I do not.
--
CB
The false charge of racism is simply a tactic to choke off rational
discussion, a strategy of intimidation to silence expression . . . It
is based on a shrewd calculation of the moral cowardice of man . . .
fearful of becoming the target of such abuse.--Sidney Hook
That discussion 'is' about character.
---------------------------------------------------------
"Unfrozen Caveman Politician Gore":
<CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
No one wants a foul mouthed ***** working for him, no matter
what skin he wears.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky " |
|
| Title: Re: MoreLeftist appeasement---DANA STILL HATES "NIGGERS" |
03 Feb 2005 06:52:26 AM |
|
|
CB wrote:
"Gray Shockley" <grayshockley@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:0001HW.BE2554AA000E741815FAF8A0@news.giganews.com...
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:59, wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:36:13 -0500, "CB" <CB@prayforme.com> wrote:
I agree
You agree----what?
Who saw it?
You haven't managed to accept that the word "*****" is racist
How in ***** are you able to call something never witnessed--truth?
You don't seem to know the difference between "fact" and "fiction",
"belief", "Faith" and "truth".
Barta is just a reminder that the sign of the Ku Klux Klan
is a burning cross - they claim to be "Christian"
donchaknow.
And "Christian" Identity semi-claims to be "Christian"
although they, also, don't like to hear about that Jesus
guy.
Here's definition #1 from my 1994 edition of the _American
Heritage Dictionary_:
1.a. Used as a disparaging term for a Black
person: ³You can only be destroyed by
believing that you really are what the
white world calls a *****² (James
Baldwin). b. Used as a disparaging term
for a member of any dark-skinned people.
And that is the way it's going to be taken.
Any attempt to use the word in any context other than that
of definition and explanation is, pretty generally, going
to have to be used in a racist manner.
The times I've seen Charlie Barta use the word "*****",
it's as if he is using a naughty word when his parents
can't hear him; the forbidden joy of using a racist term in
a manner that he "thinks" won't be taken as racist.
Or, more accurately, a word that he uses to attract
attention to himself because he thinks people are going to
go along with his use of a term after he explains how he is
using the word.
There's just one little problem with that: it's racist no
matter how it's used.
When Charlie Barta uses the word, he's saying that the
person is //like// a "*****".
So it's Barta's racism coming through, no matter what.
If the boy doesn't want to be called a racist, he shouldn't
use racist terms.
The use of the word is racist and that's all there is too
it.
I can remember coming out of my part of the motor pool at
Fort Polk at quitting time and two black guys from the
motor mech section walking a few paces in front of me and
one using "*****" in his conversaion.
I did a "Tut, tut" at them and when they turned around, I
suggested that "If you use it, then it must be okay if I
use it. Right?"
One of them told me (out on a FTx months later) that there
had been all sorts of discussions about that in the
barracks and that the general consensus was that nobody,
mebbe, ought to be using the word.
The word is racist. It's always racist. If someone uses it
and it's not an "intellectual" (or whatever) discussion,
the person is a racist.
And anyone who uses the word degrades her/himself far more
than the person s/he is calling names.
What you say might be true 'if' I were to use it in racist context, which
you know I do not.
The word is racist - here we go again. Quit lying about what the word means.
http://www.ferris.edu/news/jimcrow/caricature/
The etymology of ***** is often traced to the Latin niger, meaning
black. The Latin niger became the noun negro (black person) in English,
and simply the color black in Spanish and Portuguese. In Early Modern
French niger became negre and, later, negress (black woman) was clearly
a part of lexical history. One can compare to negre the derogatory
***** and earlier English variants such as negar, neegar, neger, and
niggor which developed into a parallel lexico-semantic reality in
English. It is likely that ***** is a phonetic spelling of the white
Southern mispronunciation of Negro. Whatever its origins, by the early
1800s it was firmly established as a denigrative epithet. Almost two
centuries later, it remains a chief symbol of white racism.
.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |