| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"jcon" |
| Date: |
03 Mar 2007 10:03:54 AM |
| Object: |
More fun with Conserapedia |
I know it's like making fun of the handicapped, but it's so
entertaining.
My favorite entry is for the Sun:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Sun
Two lines and they're both wrong! (sun is not on fire, and
was created on the *fourth* day of Genesis)
but there's lots of other material. Here, the writers
get confused between and "article" and a discussion
page, and grant wonderful insight into the depth
of their thoughts
http://www.conservapedia.com/Crusades..._Good_or_Bad%3F
For most superfluous religious comment, I nominate
kangaroo
http://www.conservapedia.com/Kangaroo
whose legs were "designed by God for leaping". Why
did God want kangaroos to leap? Although
I also find it interesting that even for
the "metric system"
http://www.conservapedia.com/Metric_System
they cite a creationist textbook.
I think it says something that their article on
homosexuality
http://www.conservapedia.com/Homosexuality
is two or three times as long as their
article on Jesus
http://www.conservapedia.com/Jesus
Although their article on James Maxwell (father
of electromagnetism) is very short, they still
find room to mention that he didn't believe in
evolution
http://www.conservapedia.com/James_Maxwell
Can't figure out whether the Noah comment
about drunkenness is vandalism or
just honesty:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Noah
I'm considering starting a "Conservapedia
Hall of Fame" website. Contributions
anyone?
-jc
.
|
|
| User: "Lisbeth Andersson" |
|
| Title: Re: More fun with Conserapedia |
03 Mar 2007 08:12:36 PM |
|
|
"jcon" <cirejcon@yahoo.com> wrote in news:1172937834.447146.13370
@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com:
<....>
Can't figure out whether the Noah comment
about drunkenness is vandalism or
just honesty:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Noah
<....>
To quote from the article:
" have two of every "clean"(kosher) animal and 7 of every clean
animal."
I think that is vandalism, they couldn't possibly tolerate that much
honesty. :-)
Lisbeth.
----
The day I don't learn anything new is the day I die.
*What we know is not nearly as interesting as *how we know it.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Wally Anglesea™" |
|
| Title: Re: More fun with Conserapedia |
05 Mar 2007 12:03:37 AM |
|
|
On 3 Mar 2007 08:03:54 -0800, "jcon" <cirejcon@yahoo.com> wrote:
I know it's like making fun of the handicapped, but it's so
entertaining.
My favorite entry is for the Sun:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Sun
Two lines and they're both wrong! (sun is not on fire, and
was created on the *fourth* day of Genesis)
but there's lots of other material. Here, the writers
get confused between and "article" and a discussion
page, and grant wonderful insight into the depth
of their thoughts
http://www.conservapedia.com/Crusades..._Good_or_Bad%3F
For most superfluous religious comment, I nominate
kangaroo
http://www.conservapedia.com/Kangaroo
whose legs were "designed by God for leaping". Why
did God want kangaroos to leap? Although
I also find it interesting that even for
the "metric system"
http://www.conservapedia.com/Metric_System
they cite a creationist textbook.
I think it says something that their article on
homosexuality
http://www.conservapedia.com/Homosexuality
is two or three times as long as their
article on Jesus
http://www.conservapedia.com/Jesus
Although their article on James Maxwell (father
of electromagnetism) is very short, they still
find room to mention that he didn't believe in
evolution
http://www.conservapedia.com/James_Maxwell
Can't figure out whether the Noah comment
about drunkenness is vandalism or
just honesty:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Noah
I'm considering starting a "Conservapedia
Hall of Fame" website. Contributions
anyone?
How about this one:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Fossils
All the answers in a single sentence. Nothing more to learn.
http://www.conservapedia.com/Moon is woeful, and includes at least
one big lie.
-jc
--
Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm
"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."
"Maths proves you know how to plug in some figures into a formula, that's
all"
"Even physics is based on wrong theories, so what's the use of maths"
Carole - demonstrating her mathematical abilities.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: More fun with Conserapedia |
23 Mar 2007 07:37:36 AM |
|
|
These people can't have much time to edit over at conservapedia - take
a look at the "recent edits" page
http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Recentchanges
All they seem to do is block people...
BTW, their entry on beef is a cracker..
http://www.conservapedia.com/Beef
D
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c" |
|
| Title: Re: More fun with Conserapedia |
03 Mar 2007 12:48:38 PM |
|
|
On 3 Mar 2007 08:03:54 -0800, "jcon" <cirejcon@yahoo.com> wrote:
I know it's like making fun of the handicapped, but it's so
entertaining.
My favorite entry is for the Sun:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Sun
Two lines and they're both wrong! (sun is not on fire, and
was created on the *fourth* day of Genesis)
but there's lots of other material. Here, the writers
get confused between and "article" and a discussion
page, and grant wonderful insight into the depth
of their thoughts
http://www.conservapedia.com/Crusades..._Good_or_Bad%3F
For most superfluous religious comment, I nominate
kangaroo
http://www.conservapedia.com/Kangaroo
whose legs were "designed by God for leaping". Why
did God want kangaroos to leap? Although
I also find it interesting that even for
the "metric system"
http://www.conservapedia.com/Metric_System
they cite a creationist textbook.
From the link:
"It is called the "metric system" because its units of length are
based on the meter."
Who wrote this, a third grader?
I think it says something that their article on
homosexuality
http://www.conservapedia.com/Homosexuality
is two or three times as long as their
article on Jesus
http://www.conservapedia.com/Jesus
Although their article on James Maxwell (father
of electromagnetism) is very short, they still
find room to mention that he didn't believe in
evolution
http://www.conservapedia.com/James_Maxwell
Can't figure out whether the Noah comment
about drunkenness is vandalism or
just honesty:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Noah
I'm considering starting a "Conservapedia
Hall of Fame" website. Contributions
anyone?
-jc
--
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
The Bush 'balanced' budget: -3 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -3165 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
newsgroups Yang promises not to revenge post
in response to Sound-of-Trumpet's *****:
rec.art.scifi.written
sci.archaeology
soc.history.what-if
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lawson English" |
|
| Title: Re: More fun with Conserapedia |
03 Mar 2007 06:42:24 PM |
|
|
Yang, AthD (h.c) wrote:
On 3 Mar 2007 08:03:54 -0800, "jcon" <cirejcon@yahoo.com> wrote:
I know it's like making fun of the handicapped, but it's so
entertaining.
My favorite entry is for the Sun:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Sun
Two lines and they're both wrong! (sun is not on fire, and
was created on the *fourth* day of Genesis)
but there's lots of other material. Here, the writers
get confused between and "article" and a discussion
page, and grant wonderful insight into the depth
of their thoughts
http://www.conservapedia.com/Crusades..._Good_or_Bad%3F
For most superfluous religious comment, I nominate
kangaroo
http://www.conservapedia.com/Kangaroo
whose legs were "designed by God for leaping". Why
did God want kangaroos to leap? Although
I also find it interesting that even for
the "metric system"
http://www.conservapedia.com/Metric_System
they cite a creationist textbook.
From the link:
"It is called the "metric system" because its units of length are
based on the meter."
Who wrote this, a third grader?
I think it says something that their article on
homosexuality
http://www.conservapedia.com/Homosexuality
is two or three times as long as their
article on Jesus
http://www.conservapedia.com/Jesus
Although their article on James Maxwell (father
of electromagnetism) is very short, they still
find room to mention that he didn't believe in
evolution
http://www.conservapedia.com/James_Maxwell
Can't figure out whether the Noah comment
about drunkenness is vandalism or
just honesty:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Noah
I'm considering starting a "Conservapedia
Hall of Fame" website. Contributions
anyone?
-jc
Some of the entries are by vandals. The problem is that you often can't
tell the vandals from the sincere editors. Most telling, this applies,
in my opinion, to remarks made by the FOUNDER of the wiki.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
