| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Matt Silberstein" |
| Date: |
16 May 2007 07:26:56 PM |
| Object: |
More liberal bias in the media |
Fox News' Pro-Giuliani Conflict of Interest - May 16, 2007
"Rudy Giuliani's much-publicized but misleading put-down of Ron Paul
during Tuesday night's Republican presidential debate should have been
tempered by a report that Saudi Arabia, the country that spawned most
of the 9/11 hijackers, has been one of Giuliani's lucrative foreign
clients. However, Fox News questioners Chris Wallace and Wendell Goler
did not bring it up.
Perhaps this can be explained by the fact that the same Associated
Press story that named Saudi Arabia as a Giuliani client listed News
Corporation, the parent company of Fox News, as another Giuliani
client. This AP story, which was not disputed by Giuliani or News
Corporation, was carried on the Fox News website."
http://www.aim.org/aim_column/5461_0_3_0_C/
Pretty obviously the liberal media want Giuliani as the Republican
nominee and Fox, as part of the vast liberal media conspiracy, help
him along.
--
Matt Silberstein
Do something today about the Darfur Genocide
http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org
"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
.
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: More liberal bias in the media |
16 May 2007 10:21:37 PM |
|
|
Matt Silberstein wrote:
Pretty obviously the liberal media want Giuliani as the Republican
nominee and Fox, as part of the vast liberal media conspiracy, help
him along.
How do those "liberal media" people hold their jobs?
The media is owned by the right.
Perhaps there are not enough intelligent people to fill the jobs available
if the ultra conservative owners fired all them hippies.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: More liberal bias in the media |
16 May 2007 09:32:04 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 17 May 2007 00:26:56 GMT, Matt Silberstein
<RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Pretty obviously the liberal media want Giuliani as the Republican
nominee and Fox, as part of the vast liberal media conspiracy, help
him along.
Of course we do. Think not even long-term, Matt, but a few months down
the road, when the Religious Right's increasingly uneasy coalition
with the Republican Party breaks down entirely over his candidacy. I
couldn't think of a better thing for the Democrats than Rudy getting
the Republican nomination. It won't actually happen, since there's no
way he can actually win primaries dominated by social conservatives
(among other things, he publicly committed adultery while living with
a gay couple while mayor of NYC, and is pro gun-control and
pro-choice), but it would be nice to see.
Also, as a New Yorker, if I could just inject a personal observation,
most of us despised the jerk by September 10th, 2001; that he's
regarded as a hero outside the city for simply doing his job post-9/11
is virtually inexplicable to those of us who actually live here. Which
was reflected in a poll in the past few days which showed that New
Yorkers, if given a choice, overwhelmingly would rather see our
current mayor, Mike Bloomberg, as President over Rudy. (I wouldn't
want to see either, but Mike would certainly be preferable...)
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
