| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Pt. Lurk Pt." |
| Date: |
14 Jun 2007 10:10:04 AM |
| Object: |
More on why those 'Gospels' are *late forgeries*... |
http://www.jesuspolice.com/common_error.php?id=19
L.
.
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: More on why those 'Gospels' are *late forgeries*... |
14 Jun 2007 06:29:49 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:10:04 GMT, "Pt. Lurk" <Pt. Lurk@renvcom.net>
wrote:
- Refer: <gTcci.1836$Yc4.929@newsfe7-gui.ntli.net>
http://www.jesuspolice.com/common_error.php?id=19
The evidence for the supposed gospels being later fabrications is
overwhelming, and the evidence for them being as claimed, is precisely
ZERO.
But no Xter will ever let facts get in the way of their toxic meme.
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jeckyl" |
|
| Title: Re: More on why those 'Gospels' are *late forgeries*... |
14 Jun 2007 10:40:10 PM |
|
|
"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:voj373p0l9u4l7c04t2std2p1q7v2070uq@4ax.com...
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:10:04 GMT, "Pt. Lurk" <Pt. Lurk@renvcom.net>
wrote:
- Refer: <gTcci.1836$Yc4.929@newsfe7-gui.ntli.net>
http://www.jesuspolice.com/common_error.php?id=19
The evidence for the supposed gospels being later fabrications is
overwhelming, and the evidence for them being as claimed, is precisely
ZERO.
But no Xter will ever let facts get in the way of their toxic meme.
Its generally accepted that the gospels were late first / early second
century books .. the earliest being mark (65-80AD), then Matthew (80-100AD),
then Luke (80-130AD), then John (90-120). Of course, these are educated
'guesses' by various scholars.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
