More Problems with IDIOT LIBERAL Dan Rather's Wacky Fake 'evidence'
about GW Bush:
* The font does not appear to match any available at that time.
* No letterhead.
* Did the typewriters at the time have the ability to make curved
apostrophes, and the elevated, smaller-font 'th' at the end? Why does
the document appear to shift between straight-line apostrophes and
curved-line
ones? For that matter, why does one document refer to "1 st Lt. Bush"
with a rather glaring space between the numeral 1 and the 'st'? Could
this be an effort to overcome a modern word processor's setting to
bump up the 'st'?
* The size of the paper should be 8x10.5, not 8.5x11. Where is the
line on the photocopy?
* Is it mere coincidence that typing the same words into Microsoft
Word results in spacing and line breaks, if left to Word's defaults,
are identical to those in the CBS document?
Yet another observation from a Kerry Spot reader: "IBM did have a
'custom element' option available for the Selectric, that did make
special symbols like logos, copyright symbols, super and subscripts
like the "th" used in the August 18 memo in question, but these were
VERY rare and VERY expensive because it required special tooling at
the IBM typewriter plant in Lexington, Kentucky."
related info at:
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/9/9/192002.shtml
==========================
Dan Rather ends his career pulling a lame stunt like this, what a
loser!!
,
QUIT
.
|
