| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Andres64" |
| Date: |
12 Oct 2005 09:28:55 AM |
| Object: |
More RCC abuse cover-up. Shocking. |
Records show L.A. Catholic sex abuse cover-up
Church sent accused priests to therapy, new parishes, according to
papers
Updated: 9:06 a.m. ET Oct. 12, 2005
LOS ANGELES - For decades, the Roman Catholic Church's Los Angeles
archdiocese ignored parishioners' sex abuse complaints and shipped
accused priests between therapy and new assignments, according to newly
released personnel records involving 126 clergymen.
In many cases, there was little mention of child molestation in
documents. Instead, euphemisms such as "boundary violations" were
used to describe the conduct.
The summaries of the personnel records were released Tuesday as part of
settlement talks with lawyers for more than 500 accusers who sued the
nation's largest Catholic archdiocese.
The records, released after nearly three years of legal wrangling,
cover priests who were ordained as far back as the 1920s. The documents
offer details in numerous cases, though much of the information has
already been published.
Raymond P. Boucher, the plaintiffs' lead attorney, said the newly
released information was a first step but that complete personnel
files, including letters of transfer and other confidential documents,
should be made public.
"The significance of these files is that they provide a little more
information for the public about the church's knowledge and frankly
their participation in the molestation of children, but until the
(entire) files are made public, we're not going to be satisfied,"
he said.
Documents originally blocked
Archdiocese and plaintiff attorneys had agreed to release the
information, but lawyers for the accused clergy succeeded in blocking
publication, arguing it would violate their clients' privacy rights.
An appellate court ordered the documents released last month.
Archdiocese attorney J. Michael Hennigan called Boucher's concerns
that the summaries might be whitewashed "nonsense."
"Ray has not seen the files themselves and has no basis to say that
beyond speculation," he said. "These are accurate descriptions of
the content of the files, without disclosing confidential
communication."
One priest, who served as a teacher and administrator at numerous
Southern California schools, was convicted of molesting two boys and
given probation. The conviction was later expunged from his record.
A subsequent report was made in 1994 of "boundary violations," in
which he allegedly patted the buttocks of a teenager. He entered
alcohol treatment days later and was eventually placed on leave.
Action delayed
Another priest's file shows the archdiocese received repeated
complaints that he engaged in "inappropriate sexual conduct with
children" beginning in 1959, but that it did not appear to take
significant action against him until 1994 when he was relieved of his
duties, documents said.
David Clohessy, who heads a victims' rights group, called the
information release a "shrewd public relations effort," as civil
cases against the clergy inch toward trial.
But Hennigan said in the early days of the accusations, church
officials did not go to civil authorities because "parents of
children who had been victims did not want their children famous for
this. They did not want people talking about this."
Hennigan said that in many cases counseling was offered to clergymen
accused of abuse. Those accused were generally removed from the
ministry altogether as church officials' understanding of sexual
abuse increased, he said.
The files show that in many cases the church provided years of therapy
to some of the clergy.
The archdiocese has posted nearly 150 pages of summaries from the
clergy files on its Web site.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9670005/
.
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: More RCC abuse cover-up. Shocking. |
12 Oct 2005 10:00:23 AM |
|
|
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in message
news:1129127335.037520.62720@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Records show L.A. Catholic sex abuse cover-up
Church sent accused priests to therapy, new parishes, according to
papers
Updated: 9:06 a.m. ET Oct. 12, 2005
LOS ANGELES - For decades, the Roman Catholic Church's Los Angeles
archdiocese ignored parishioners' sex abuse complaints and shipped
accused priests between therapy and new assignments, according to newly
released personnel records involving 126 clergymen.
In many cases, there was little mention of child molestation in
documents. Instead, euphemisms such as "boundary violations" were
used to describe the conduct.
The summaries of the personnel records were released Tuesday as part of
settlement talks with lawyers for more than 500 accusers who sued the
nation's largest Catholic archdiocese.
The records, released after nearly three years of legal wrangling,
cover priests who were ordained as far back as the 1920s. The documents
offer details in numerous cases, though much of the information has
already been published.
Raymond P. Boucher, the plaintiffs' lead attorney, said the newly
released information was a first step but that complete personnel
files, including letters of transfer and other confidential documents,
should be made public.
"The significance of these files is that they provide a little more
information for the public about the church's knowledge and frankly
their participation in the molestation of children, but until the
(entire) files are made public, we're not going to be satisfied,"
he said.
Documents originally blocked
Archdiocese and plaintiff attorneys had agreed to release the
information, but lawyers for the accused clergy succeeded in blocking
publication, arguing it would violate their clients' privacy rights.
An appellate court ordered the documents released last month.
Archdiocese attorney J. Michael Hennigan called Boucher's concerns
that the summaries might be whitewashed "nonsense."
"Ray has not seen the files themselves and has no basis to say that
beyond speculation," he said. "These are accurate descriptions of
the content of the files, without disclosing confidential
communication."
One priest, who served as a teacher and administrator at numerous
Southern California schools, was convicted of molesting two boys and
given probation. The conviction was later expunged from his record.
A subsequent report was made in 1994 of "boundary violations," in
which he allegedly patted the buttocks of a teenager. He entered
alcohol treatment days later and was eventually placed on leave.
Action delayed
Another priest's file shows the archdiocese received repeated
complaints that he engaged in "inappropriate sexual conduct with
children" beginning in 1959, but that it did not appear to take
significant action against him until 1994 when he was relieved of his
duties, documents said.
David Clohessy, who heads a victims' rights group, called the
information release a "shrewd public relations effort," as civil
cases against the clergy inch toward trial.
But Hennigan said in the early days of the accusations, church
officials did not go to civil authorities because "parents of
children who had been victims did not want their children famous for
this. They did not want people talking about this."
Hennigan said that in many cases counseling was offered to clergymen
accused of abuse. Those accused were generally removed from the
ministry altogether as church officials' understanding of sexual
abuse increased, he said.
The files show that in many cases the church provided years of therapy
to some of the clergy.
The archdiocese has posted nearly 150 pages of summaries from the
clergy files on its Web site.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9670005/
Utterly disgusting. I'm so glad to have extricated myself
from the RCC, and even happier that I resisted pressuring
from my family to get my child into church. It's becoming
evident that the RCC is little more than a haven for
pedophiles and their enablers.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: More RCC abuse cover-up. Shocking. |
14 Oct 2005 04:27:43 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:00:23 -0400, "Bob"
<rGODpoore@GODknology.GOD.net> wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in message
news:1129127335.037520.62720@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Records show L.A. Catholic sex abuse cover-up
Church sent accused priests to therapy, new parishes, according to
papers
Updated: 9:06 a.m. ET Oct. 12, 2005
LOS ANGELES - For decades, the Roman Catholic Church's Los Angeles
archdiocese ignored parishioners' sex abuse complaints and shipped
accused priests between therapy and new assignments, according to newly
released personnel records involving 126 clergymen.
In many cases, there was little mention of child molestation in
documents. Instead, euphemisms such as "boundary violations" were
used to describe the conduct.
The summaries of the personnel records were released Tuesday as part of
settlement talks with lawyers for more than 500 accusers who sued the
nation's largest Catholic archdiocese.
The records, released after nearly three years of legal wrangling,
cover priests who were ordained as far back as the 1920s. The documents
offer details in numerous cases, though much of the information has
already been published.
Raymond P. Boucher, the plaintiffs' lead attorney, said the newly
released information was a first step but that complete personnel
files, including letters of transfer and other confidential documents,
should be made public.
"The significance of these files is that they provide a little more
information for the public about the church's knowledge and frankly
their participation in the molestation of children, but until the
(entire) files are made public, we're not going to be satisfied,"
he said.
Documents originally blocked
Archdiocese and plaintiff attorneys had agreed to release the
information, but lawyers for the accused clergy succeeded in blocking
publication, arguing it would violate their clients' privacy rights.
An appellate court ordered the documents released last month.
Archdiocese attorney J. Michael Hennigan called Boucher's concerns
that the summaries might be whitewashed "nonsense."
"Ray has not seen the files themselves and has no basis to say that
beyond speculation," he said. "These are accurate descriptions of
the content of the files, without disclosing confidential
communication."
One priest, who served as a teacher and administrator at numerous
Southern California schools, was convicted of molesting two boys and
given probation. The conviction was later expunged from his record.
A subsequent report was made in 1994 of "boundary violations," in
which he allegedly patted the buttocks of a teenager. He entered
alcohol treatment days later and was eventually placed on leave.
Action delayed
Another priest's file shows the archdiocese received repeated
complaints that he engaged in "inappropriate sexual conduct with
children" beginning in 1959, but that it did not appear to take
significant action against him until 1994 when he was relieved of his
duties, documents said.
David Clohessy, who heads a victims' rights group, called the
information release a "shrewd public relations effort," as civil
cases against the clergy inch toward trial.
But Hennigan said in the early days of the accusations, church
officials did not go to civil authorities because "parents of
children who had been victims did not want their children famous for
this. They did not want people talking about this."
Hennigan said that in many cases counseling was offered to clergymen
accused of abuse. Those accused were generally removed from the
ministry altogether as church officials' understanding of sexual
abuse increased, he said.
The files show that in many cases the church provided years of therapy
to some of the clergy.
The archdiocese has posted nearly 150 pages of summaries from the
clergy files on its Web site.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9670005/
Utterly disgusting. I'm so glad to have extricated myself
from the RCC, and even happier that I resisted pressuring
from my family to get my child into church. It's becoming
evident that the RCC is little more than a haven for
pedophiles and their enablers.
What do you expect from a bunch of perverts?
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president
represents, more and more closely, the inner soul
of the people. On some great and glorious day the
plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire at last and the White House will be adorned
by a downright moron." --- H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
| User: "AZ Nomad" |
|
| Title: Re: More RCC abuse cover-up. Shocking. |
14 Oct 2005 04:45:34 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:27:43 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:00:23 -0400, "Bob"
<rGODpoore@GODknology.GOD.net> wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in message
news:1129127335.037520.62720@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Records show L.A. Catholic sex abuse cover-up
Church sent accused priests to therapy, new parishes, according to
papers
Updated: 9:06 a.m. ET Oct. 12, 2005
LOS ANGELES - For decades, the Roman Catholic Church's Los Angeles
archdiocese ignored parishioners' sex abuse complaints and shipped
accused priests between therapy and new assignments, according to newly
released personnel records involving 126 clergymen.
In many cases, there was little mention of child molestation in
documents. Instead, euphemisms such as "boundary violations" were
used to describe the conduct.
The summaries of the personnel records were released Tuesday as part of
settlement talks with lawyers for more than 500 accusers who sued the
nation's largest Catholic archdiocese.
The records, released after nearly three years of legal wrangling,
cover priests who were ordained as far back as the 1920s. The documents
offer details in numerous cases, though much of the information has
already been published.
Raymond P. Boucher, the plaintiffs' lead attorney, said the newly
released information was a first step but that complete personnel
files, including letters of transfer and other confidential documents,
should be made public.
"The significance of these files is that they provide a little more
information for the public about the church's knowledge and frankly
their participation in the molestation of children, but until the
(entire) files are made public, we're not going to be satisfied,"
he said.
Documents originally blocked
Archdiocese and plaintiff attorneys had agreed to release the
information, but lawyers for the accused clergy succeeded in blocking
publication, arguing it would violate their clients' privacy rights.
An appellate court ordered the documents released last month.
Archdiocese attorney J. Michael Hennigan called Boucher's concerns
that the summaries might be whitewashed "nonsense."
"Ray has not seen the files themselves and has no basis to say that
beyond speculation," he said. "These are accurate descriptions of
the content of the files, without disclosing confidential
communication."
One priest, who served as a teacher and administrator at numerous
Southern California schools, was convicted of molesting two boys and
given probation. The conviction was later expunged from his record.
A subsequent report was made in 1994 of "boundary violations," in
which he allegedly patted the buttocks of a teenager. He entered
alcohol treatment days later and was eventually placed on leave.
Action delayed
Another priest's file shows the archdiocese received repeated
complaints that he engaged in "inappropriate sexual conduct with
children" beginning in 1959, but that it did not appear to take
significant action against him until 1994 when he was relieved of his
duties, documents said.
David Clohessy, who heads a victims' rights group, called the
information release a "shrewd public relations effort," as civil
cases against the clergy inch toward trial.
But Hennigan said in the early days of the accusations, church
officials did not go to civil authorities because "parents of
children who had been victims did not want their children famous for
this. They did not want people talking about this."
Hennigan said that in many cases counseling was offered to clergymen
accused of abuse. Those accused were generally removed from the
ministry altogether as church officials' understanding of sexual
abuse increased, he said.
The files show that in many cases the church provided years of therapy
to some of the clergy.
The archdiocese has posted nearly 150 pages of summaries from the
clergy files on its Web site.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9670005/
Utterly disgusting. I'm so glad to have extricated myself
from the RCC, and even happier that I resisted pressuring
from my family to get my child into church. It's becoming
evident that the RCC is little more than a haven for
pedophiles and their enablers.
What do you expect from a bunch of perverts?
What is especially troubling is that the RCC for the most part acts as their
religion teaches. Chrisitanity is from a time when women were property and
children were disposable. Nobody sending their children into such an
institution should be surprised when a rape occurs.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: More RCC abuse cover-up. Shocking. |
16 Oct 2005 06:30:55 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 21:45:34 GMT, AZ Nomad <aznomad@PmunOgeBOX.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:27:43 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:00:23 -0400, "Bob"
<rGODpoore@GODknology.GOD.net> wrote:
"Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote in message
news:1129127335.037520.62720@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Records show L.A. Catholic sex abuse cover-up
Church sent accused priests to therapy, new parishes, according to
papers
Updated: 9:06 a.m. ET Oct. 12, 2005
LOS ANGELES - For decades, the Roman Catholic Church's Los Angeles
archdiocese ignored parishioners' sex abuse complaints and shipped
accused priests between therapy and new assignments, according to newly
released personnel records involving 126 clergymen.
In many cases, there was little mention of child molestation in
documents. Instead, euphemisms such as "boundary violations" were
used to describe the conduct.
The summaries of the personnel records were released Tuesday as part of
settlement talks with lawyers for more than 500 accusers who sued the
nation's largest Catholic archdiocese.
The records, released after nearly three years of legal wrangling,
cover priests who were ordained as far back as the 1920s. The documents
offer details in numerous cases, though much of the information has
already been published.
Raymond P. Boucher, the plaintiffs' lead attorney, said the newly
released information was a first step but that complete personnel
files, including letters of transfer and other confidential documents,
should be made public.
"The significance of these files is that they provide a little more
information for the public about the church's knowledge and frankly
their participation in the molestation of children, but until the
(entire) files are made public, we're not going to be satisfied,"
he said.
Documents originally blocked
Archdiocese and plaintiff attorneys had agreed to release the
information, but lawyers for the accused clergy succeeded in blocking
publication, arguing it would violate their clients' privacy rights.
An appellate court ordered the documents released last month.
Archdiocese attorney J. Michael Hennigan called Boucher's concerns
that the summaries might be whitewashed "nonsense."
"Ray has not seen the files themselves and has no basis to say that
beyond speculation," he said. "These are accurate descriptions of
the content of the files, without disclosing confidential
communication."
One priest, who served as a teacher and administrator at numerous
Southern California schools, was convicted of molesting two boys and
given probation. The conviction was later expunged from his record.
A subsequent report was made in 1994 of "boundary violations," in
which he allegedly patted the buttocks of a teenager. He entered
alcohol treatment days later and was eventually placed on leave.
Action delayed
Another priest's file shows the archdiocese received repeated
complaints that he engaged in "inappropriate sexual conduct with
children" beginning in 1959, but that it did not appear to take
significant action against him until 1994 when he was relieved of his
duties, documents said.
David Clohessy, who heads a victims' rights group, called the
information release a "shrewd public relations effort," as civil
cases against the clergy inch toward trial.
But Hennigan said in the early days of the accusations, church
officials did not go to civil authorities because "parents of
children who had been victims did not want their children famous for
this. They did not want people talking about this."
Hennigan said that in many cases counseling was offered to clergymen
accused of abuse. Those accused were generally removed from the
ministry altogether as church officials' understanding of sexual
abuse increased, he said.
The files show that in many cases the church provided years of therapy
to some of the clergy.
The archdiocese has posted nearly 150 pages of summaries from the
clergy files on its Web site.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9670005/
Utterly disgusting. I'm so glad to have extricated myself
from the RCC, and even happier that I resisted pressuring
from my family to get my child into church. It's becoming
evident that the RCC is little more than a haven for
pedophiles and their enablers.
What do you expect from a bunch of perverts?
What is especially troubling is that the RCC for the most part acts as their
religion teaches. Chrisitanity is from a time when women were property and
children were disposable. Nobody sending their children into such an
institution should be surprised when a rape occurs.
I agree, but thought isn't encouraged by the superstition.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president
represents, more and more closely, the inner soul
of the people. On some great and glorious day the
plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire at last and the White House will be adorned
by a downright moron." --- H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: More RCC abuse cover-up. Shocking. |
08 Nov 2005 03:35:49 PM |
|
|
The following is essentially a true tale of mine, from a few years ago.
I was not raped by a priest, but my story is no less harrowing. You
know, the Middle East and SE Asia have for decades, at least, been
locales where American gays and bisexuals have "vacationed" because of
the availability of boys, from elementary-school-age to late teens.
Recall the U.S. hostages taken in 1979 by Iran? Most of the men were
posted in that region for years. Some were married, some not. But
there's always been scuttlebutt that many of the "government workers"
were there for boy sex.
I know of several men who customarily visited India, where comely boys
are often encouraged by their family members to make themselves
available to American male tourists for small change.
Comments? -- T
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I've been a cross-dresser since my early teens and as a guy I've often
caught a lot of torment and taunting. Probably my worst episode was
when I was 15 and stayed with my Uncle Jed and cousin Billy when my Mom
was away for a weekend. I had begged her not to stick me with my uncle
and cousin, though I couldn't bring myself to tell her it was because
they teased me about my so-called 'effeminate personality.'
I was always small, about 115 pounds at the time, light brown hair and
eyes, petite, and, yeah, I was, and still am, gay. I was also an anal
virgin, although I had urgent and persistent dreams about having sex
with a male. And today I'm not afraid to admit that when I was 12, I
sucked a second cousin off for two bottles of beer.
Anyway, that day in our town, Pontiac, Mich., Mom dropped me off at
their house Friday night and soon after
she left the two of them started in on me.
"Well, little Timmy," Uncle Jed lisped mockingly, "your eyeliner and
lip gloss look mighty pretty this evening!"
I tried to ignore this and other comments that followed, but after a
while I got fed up with his teasing and yelled, "Go to hell, will you?
Leave me alone!"
"Look you little *****," he bellowed, "you're not gonna talk to your
uncle that way! I'm goin' to teach you a lesson, you little *****!"
He moved toward me in a threatening manner, and I turned to run but he
caught me by the back of my pullover sweater. "What you need, queerboy,
is a ***** up your *****, and I'm just the one to give it to you, right
Billy!"
"Yo, Dad," said my dim-witted 18-year-old cousin.
Uncle Jed tightened his grip on my pullover but as I jerked away the
sweater was dragged up to my armpits, revealing my petite beige Bali
bra.
"Jesus, will ya look at this!" Uncle shrieked. "Looks like we DO have a
girl here!"
He pulled up the cups of the lacy bra to reveal my erect nipples, which
he flicked with his finger.
"Owwww!" I winced, as he smirked.
"Nice titties, sweety!"
Billy stood there laughing. It was embarrassing enough to be bared like
that by my uncle, but having my cousin watch was really disheartening.
Uncle Jed -- a big, burly guy, about 6 feet tall and maybe 230 pounds
-- dragged me by my pullover across the living room and sat on the
sofa, pulling me in one swoop across his lap, face up, whereupon he
proceeded to strip the sweater off over my head. Then he snapped the
button and unzipped my jeans, exposing my matching sheer bikini
panties.
"Wow, Dad," Billy said, "he's got women's underpants on!"
"Yeah, but not for long," and Uncle Jed stripped my jeans to my ankles,
pulled off my loafers, then yanked the jeans off.
By now I was developing a hard-on and my slender four-inch cut penis
was peeking above the lowered waistband of my little panties.
"This little 'gal' likes to wear panties!" Uncle Jed said to Billy. "So
what do you say we help 'her' out?"
He then stripped my diaphanous panties off -- but instead of casting
them on the floor with my jeans, he stretched them over my head, with
the crotch stretched right over my face. My slim hairless body (of
course, I kept
my public region shaved) was now bare to their view.
With my panties covering my view, Uncle Jed turned me over on my belly
and began to pet and caress my tight, curvy little behind. He massaged
me with one hand and with the other he parted my saucy buttocks and
dragged his fingers over my exposed *****. I felt my ***** tighten
underneath me.
Over my uncle's lap, my penis was nestled between his trousered thighs,
and as Uncle Jed inserted a thick finger into my butt-hole, the steady
friction on my hard ***** brought me to the brink of orgasm. Sensing
this, Uncle Jed continued to knead and caress my buttocks while moving
his inserted finger in and out of my tight puckered rosebud.
Soon I was bucking and gyrating across his lap as I felt the sweet milk
rise in my sack. Then I began pre-cuming!
Suddenly, uncontrollably, I shot a gusher in his lap! Three, four, five
quick belly thrusts forced my virgin fluid to spurt from my well-teased
*****.
Seeing my creamy semen soaking his pants and dripping on the rug seemed
to excite Uncle Jed, and he jabbed a second finger into my behind. He
found my prostate, then proceeded to tease and titillate my swollen
organ.
Sobbing and gasping in the wake of my orgasm and somewhat embarrassed
in my predicament over his knee, I begged my uncle to stop, but despite
my pleas he continued to work my *****, until he sensed my ***** was
again swelling beneath me. (I can't deny that, in a perverted way,
despite my plight, I experienced undeniable surges of pleasure as my
prostate was under massage.)
Next, turning me over, he nodded approvingly at the glans of my
tortured penis - before unceremoniously pushing me off him onto the
floor.
Well, my humiliation was complete. Butt-naked except my pushed-up
brassiere and my tiny panties half covering my face and me inhaling my
own
crotch odor from the moist bikini!
All while my penis released droplets of my spent orgasm - and with my
jerk cousin staring wide-eyed at my bare balls and *****.
"Well, Billy, I think little Timmy-boy, er, -girl, is ready for what
fairies like him really want. Grab his arms and hold 'im down."
As Billy, who was almost as large as his dad, grasped my wrists above
my head, Uncle Jed slowly took down his pants and his size extra-XXX
jockeys. Unfortunately for me, his reputation for being
hygienically-challenged was confirmed as his gross body reeked of
probably days-old sweat and grime.
His thick brown uncut ***** was at least 8 inches long, and was then
well-engorged.
He knelt at my feet and, grasping my ankles, jerked my legs above my
shoulders, as Billy maintained a grip on my wrists.
Using his shoulders to force my legs upward, Uncle Jed coated his
fingers with saliva and poked them into my exposed *****, lubricating my
sphincter area for what I knew was going to be a painful ordeal.
"No, no, c'mon, Uncle Jed, please no!" I whimpered.
"You try to squirm from me and I'll beat your ***** you little *****," he
snarled.
With that he thrust his huge peter into the opening of my slickened
*****.
"Unh-ugh-ugh-ughhhhhhhh," I groaned as pain seared my virginal rectum.
He jammed his thick ***** in-out, in-out several times, until it was
fully impaled.
I must have fainted then, because when I became conscious shortly
afterward, he was withdrawing his slimy ***** from my sore heinie.
"Ohhhhhhhhhhh, Owwwwwwww!" I squealed, as I felt streamers of his salty
jism follow his ***** out of me.
"Well, I guess that'll do for now, fag boy," Uncle Jed growled, as he
drew himself up. "How was it, Timmy? Did 'ya *****, huh?"
Billy released my wrists, and I instinctively rolled into a kind of
fetal position on the floor, moaning softly as tears washed my cheeks.
I blushed, and knew their eyes were fixed on the semen that driveled
from my pee-hole.
I touched my raw anal opening where Uncle Jed's yellow-white sperm
spread slickness over my nude bottom. There was blood on my fingers and
my own juice was drying on my thin pubic hair and on my smooth belly. I
felt utterly ravished.
Well, to make a long story short, before I was allowed to clean up,
Uncle Jed made me suck Billy off - and swallow his semen. And because
I threw up, I was forced to suck Billy again!
Next day, both of them raped me and forced me to suck them off
repeatedly. Uncle Jed said that if I told my mom or anyone about what
happened, he'd waylay me and beat me silly.
The only saving feature of that weekend for me was that, Saturday
evening, after Uncle Jed had passed out drunk, Billy, who'd also been
guzzling brew, pulled me into his bedroom and, after undressing both of
us, masturbated me and finished by sucking me off! And despite my
soreness and my loathing of him, it felt sooooo good!
To this day, I can never not enjoy a *****, no matter who's got my
***** in his - or her mouth!
Needless to say, when Mom picked me up I was more than ready to leave
Uncle Jed and Billy. And luckily I was able to avoid those monsters
until I left for college.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: More RCC abuse cover-up. Shocking. |
09 Nov 2005 10:17:56 AM |
|
|
<perryneheum@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131485749.336241.206430@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
The following is essentially a true tale of mine, from a few years ago.
I was not raped by a priest, but my story is no less harrowing. You
know, the Middle East and SE Asia have for decades, at least, been
locales where American gays and bisexuals have "vacationed" because of
the availability of boys, from elementary-school-age to late teens.
Recall the U.S. hostages taken in 1979 by Iran? Most of the men were
posted in that region for years. Some were married, some not. But
there's always been scuttlebutt that many of the "government workers"
were there for boy sex.
I know of several men who customarily visited India, where comely boys
are often encouraged by their family members to make themselves
available to American male tourists for small change.
Comments? -- T
No, not really.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: More RCC abuse cover-up. Shocking. |
10 Nov 2005 10:09:10 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:17:56 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
<perryneheum@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131485749.336241.206430@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
The following is essentially a true tale of mine, from a few years ago.
I was not raped by a priest, but my story is no less harrowing. You
know, the Middle East and SE Asia have for decades, at least, been
locales where American gays and bisexuals have "vacationed" because of
the availability of boys, from elementary-school-age to late teens.
Recall the U.S. hostages taken in 1979 by Iran? Most of the men were
posted in that region for years. Some were married, some not. But
there's always been scuttlebutt that many of the "government workers"
were there for boy sex.
I know of several men who customarily visited India, where comely boys
are often encouraged by their family members to make themselves
available to American male tourists for small change.
Comments? -- T
No, not really.
Nothing of substance to comment on.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president
represents, more and more closely, the inner soul
of the people. On some great and glorious day the
plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire at last and the White House will be adorned
by a downright moron." --- H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: More RCC abuse cover-up. Shocking. |
12 Oct 2005 05:22:17 PM |
|
|
On 12 Oct 2005 07:28:55 -0700, "Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote:
Records show L.A. Catholic sex abuse cover-up
Church sent accused priests to therapy, new parishes, according to
papers
But it's old, old stuff - brought out a few years ago.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: More RCC abuse cover-up. Shocking. |
12 Oct 2005 09:12:58 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 17:22:17 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On 12 Oct 2005 07:28:55 -0700, "Andres64" <andresc64@excite.com> wrote:
Records show L.A. Catholic sex abuse cover-up
Church sent accused priests to therapy, new parishes, according to
papers
But it's old, old stuff - brought out a few years ago.
But the RCC continues to molest, molest away:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-10-10-priestabuse_x.htm
Archbishop Michael Sheehan has forbidden a retired Albuquerque priest
from participating in public ministry because of credible allegations
of sexually abusing a minor.
Sheehan said Sunday he placed Ronald Bruckner on restricted status
after a unanimous recommendation from the Archdiocesan Permanent
Review Board, which concluded "there were credible allegations."
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1959 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
-duke (duckgumbo32@cox.net), aka Earl J Weber, 63
year old mateless, heirless biological failure
of Afton Oaks Apartment, Baton Rouge, on why
a Neocon chickenhawk like him pussied out of
the Vietnam War.
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: More RCC abuse cover-up. Shocking. |
13 Oct 2005 05:53:27 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 19:12:58 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
But it's old, old stuff - brought out a few years ago.
But the RCC continues to molest, molest away:
No the RCC does not molest. People molest, like you. I'd trust a priest before
I'd trust you.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-10-10-priestabuse_x.htm
Archbishop Michael Sheehan has forbidden a retired Albuquerque priest
from participating in public ministry because of credible allegations
of sexually abusing a minor.
Sheehan said Sunday he placed Ronald Bruckner on restricted status
after a unanimous recommendation from the Archdiocesan Permanent
Review Board, which concluded "there were credible allegations."
But when!!!!!
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: More RCC abuse cover-up. Shocking. |
13 Oct 2005 09:32:34 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:53:27 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 19:12:58 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
But it's old, old stuff - brought out a few years ago.
But the RCC continues to molest, molest away:
No the RCC does not molest.
They simply cover for them
People molest, like you. I'd trust a priest before
I'd trust you.
Of course. You've been covering for pedophile priests since day 1.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-10-10-priestabuse_x.htm
Archbishop Michael Sheehan has forbidden a retired Albuquerque priest
from participating in public ministry because of credible allegations
of sexually abusing a minor.
Sheehan said Sunday he placed Ronald Bruckner on restricted status
after a unanimous recommendation from the Archdiocesan Permanent
Review Board, which concluded "there were credible allegations."
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1965 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
-duke (duckgumbo32@cox.net), aka Earl J Weber, 63
year old mateless, heirless biological failure
of Afton Oaks Apartment, Baton Rouge, on why
a Neocon chickenhawk like him pussied out of
the Vietnam War.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
