Almighty God Who art the Author of Liberty

and the Champion of the
oppressed hear our prayer.

We the men of Special Forces

, acknowledge our dependence upon Thee in
the preservation of human freedom.

Go with us as we seek to defend the
defenseless and to free the enslaved.

May we ever remember that our nation, whose oath "in God We Trust,"

expects that we shall requit ourselves with honor,

that we may never
bring shame upon our faith, our families, or our fellow men.

Grant us wisdom

from Thy mind, courage from Thine heart,

and protection
by Thine hand.

It is for Thee that we do battle

, and to thee belongs
the victor's crown.

For Thine is the kingdom, and the power and glory
forever,

Amen!

Oh how it pains me to say this, but I think Ann Coulter actually wrote
something worth reading. So I guess she's batting like .00005 now.

J Young wrote:

Muhammad Cartoons: Muslim Bites Dog

by Ann Coulter


The amazing part of the great Danish cartoon caper isn't that Muslims
immediately engage in acts of mob violence when things don't go their
way. That is de rigueur for the Religion of Peace. Their immediate
response to all bad news is mass violence. That's a "dog bites man"
story and belongs on page B-34, next to the grade school hot lunch
menu and the birth notices.

After an Egyptian ferry capsized recently, killing hundreds of
passengers, a whole braying mob of passengers' relatives staged an
organized attack on the company, throwing furniture out the window
and burning the building to the ground. Witnesses say it was the most
violent ocean liner-related incident since Carnival Cruise Lines
fired Kathie Lee Gifford.

The "offense to Islam" ruse is merely an excuse for Muslims to revert
to their default mode: rioting and setting things on fire. These
people have a serious anger management problem.

So it's not exactly a scoop that Muslims are engaging in violence. A
front-page story would be "Offended Muslims Remain Calm."

What is stunning about this spectacle is that their violence is
working. With a few exceptions, the media won't show the cartoons
that incited mass violence around the globe (see the full gallery
below). And yet, week after week, American patriots endure "The
Boondocks" without complaint. Where's the justice here?

Perhaps we could put aside our national, ongoing, post-9/11 Muslim
butt-kissing contest and get on with the business at hand: Bombing
Syria back to the stone age and then permanently disarming Iran.

The mass violence by Muslims over some cartoons reminds us why we
have to worry when countries like Iran start talking about having
nukes. Iran is led by a lunatic who makes a big point of denying the
Holocaust. Indeed, in response to the Muhammad cartoons, one Iranian
newspaper is soliciting cartoons about the Holocaust. (So far the
only submissions have come from Ted Rall, Garry Trudeau and The New
York Times.)

Iran is certainly implying that it has nukes. Maybe they do, maybe
they don't, but you can't take chances with berserk psychotics. What
if they start having one of these bipolar episodes with a nuclear
bomb?

If you don't want to get shot by the police, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad,
then don't point a toy gun at them. Or, as I believe our motto should
be after 9/11: Jihad monkey talks tough; jihad monkey takes the
consequences. Sorry, I realize that's offensive. How about "camel
jockey"? What? Now what'd I say? Boy, you tent merchants sure are
touchy. Grow up, would you?

In addition, I believe we are legally required to be bombing Syria
right now. And unlike the Koran's alleged prohibition on depictions
of Muhammad, I've got documentation to back that up!

Muslims in Syria torched the Danish Embassy a few weeks ago, burning
it to the ground. According to everyone, the Syrian government was
behind the attack -- the prime minister of Denmark, Condoleezza Rice
and White House spokesman Scott McClellan. I think even the gals on
"The View" have acknowledged that Damascus was behind this one.

McClellan said: "We will hold Syria responsible for such violent
demonstrations since they do not take place in that country without
government knowledge and support."

We are signatories to a treaty that requires us to do more than "hold
Syria responsible" for this attack. Syria has staged a
state-sponsored attack on our NATO partner on Danish soil, the Danish
embassy. According to the terms of the NATO treaty, the United States
and most of Europe have an obligation to go to war with Syria.

Or is NATO -- like the conventions of civilized behavior, personal
hygiene and grooming -- inapplicable when Muslims are involved?
Liberals complain about "unilateral action," but under the terms of a
treaty created by Dean Acheson and the Democrats, France, Germany,
Spain and Greece are all obliged to go to war with us against Syria.
Why, it's almost like a coalition! OK, Mr. Commie: Saddle up!

Oh how it pains me to say this, but I think Ann Coulter actually wrote
something worth reading. So I guess she's batting like .00005 now.

This is about power. All religions Christianity, Islam, Judaism,
Hinduism are an attempt by and elite group to control the masses with
fear and shame. The only reason the Christian right doesn't riot in
this country every time someone makes fun of their religion is we would
put them in jail. In the countries where the riots were staged no one
went to jail. There is no difference between the aims of fundamentalist
Islam and fundamentalist Christianity both groups want their dogma to
be the law of the land.

David Hovgaard

J Young wrote:

Muhammad Cartoons: Muslim Bites Dog

by Ann Coulter


The amazing part of the great Danish cartoon caper isn't that Muslims
immediately engage in acts of mob violence when things don't go their way.
That is de rigueur for the Religion of Peace. Their immediate response to
all bad news is mass violence. That's a "dog bites man" story and belongs on
page B-34, next to the grade school hot lunch menu and the birth notices.

After an Egyptian ferry capsized recently, killing hundreds of passengers, a
whole braying mob of passengers' relatives staged an organized attack on the
company, throwing furniture out the window and burning the building to the
ground. Witnesses say it was the most violent ocean liner-related incident
since Carnival Cruise Lines fired Kathie Lee Gifford.

The "offense to Islam" ruse is merely an excuse for Muslims to revert to
their default mode: rioting and setting things on fire. These people have a
serious anger management problem.

So it's not exactly a scoop that Muslims are engaging in violence. A
front-page story would be "Offended Muslims Remain Calm."

What is stunning about this spectacle is that their violence is working.
With a few exceptions, the media won't show the cartoons that incited mass
violence around the globe (see the full gallery below). And yet, week after
week, American patriots endure "The Boondocks" without complaint. Where's
the justice here?

Perhaps we could put aside our national, ongoing, post-9/11 Muslim
butt-kissing contest and get on with the business at hand: Bombing Syria
back to the stone age and then permanently disarming Iran.

The mass violence by Muslims over some cartoons reminds us why we have to
worry when countries like Iran start talking about having nukes. Iran is led
by a lunatic who makes a big point of denying the Holocaust. Indeed, in
response to the Muhammad cartoons, one Iranian newspaper is soliciting
cartoons about the Holocaust. (So far the only submissions have come from
Ted Rall, Garry Trudeau and The New York Times.)

Iran is certainly implying that it has nukes. Maybe they do, maybe they
don't, but you can't take chances with berserk psychotics. What if they
start having one of these bipolar episodes with a nuclear bomb?

If you don't want to get shot by the police, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, then don't
point a toy gun at them. Or, as I believe our motto should be after 9/11:
Jihad monkey talks tough; jihad monkey takes the consequences. Sorry, I
realize that's offensive. How about "camel jockey"? What? Now what'd I say?
Boy, you tent merchants sure are touchy. Grow up, would you?

In addition, I believe we are legally required to be bombing Syria right
now. And unlike the Koran's alleged prohibition on depictions of Muhammad,
I've got documentation to back that up!

Muslims in Syria torched the Danish Embassy a few weeks ago, burning it to
the ground. According to everyone, the Syrian government was behind the
attack -- the prime minister of Denmark, Condoleezza Rice and White House
spokesman Scott McClellan. I think even the gals on "The View" have
acknowledged that Damascus was behind this one.

McClellan said: "We will hold Syria responsible for such violent
demonstrations since they do not take place in that country without
government knowledge and support."

We are signatories to a treaty that requires us to do more than "hold Syria
responsible" for this attack. Syria has staged a state-sponsored attack on
our NATO partner on Danish soil, the Danish embassy. According to the terms
of the NATO treaty, the United States and most of Europe have an obligation
to go to war with Syria.

Or is NATO -- like the conventions of civilized behavior, personal hygiene
and grooming -- inapplicable when Muslims are involved? Liberals complain
about "unilateral action," but under the terms of a treaty created by Dean
Acheson and the Democrats, France, Germany, Spain and Greece are all obliged
to go to war with us against Syria. Why, it's almost like a coalition! OK,
Mr. Commie: Saddle up!









--
"Honesty, Integrity, Compassion, and Decency"

This is about power. All religions Christianity, Islam, Judaism,
Hinduism are an attempt by and elite group to control the masses with
fear and shame. The only reason the Christian right doesn't riot in
this country every time someone makes fun of their religion is we would
put them in jail.