| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
31 Jan 2008 01:34:38 PM |
| Object: |
myspace discriminates against atheists |
Read it here:
http://www.secularstudents.org/node/1933
.
|
|
| User: "Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy" |
|
| Title: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
31 Jan 2008 01:47:28 PM |
|
|
wrote in news:52dbf279-ee8e-465a-8fb2-ef0662457a80
@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
Read it here:
http://www.secularstudents.org/node/1933
Hardly a suprise, given what a fundy loon Rupert is. Their network,
their rules, and all.
I know I can never bother going to their ad-laden, insecure, malware
distributing shitty web site again. (Not that I didn't know that
already.)
--
Terry Austin
"There's no law west of the internet."
- Nick Stump
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
31 Jan 2008 01:59:50 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:47:28 -0000, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
<taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
nafc@snet.net wrote in news:52dbf279-ee8e-465a-8fb2-ef0662457a80
@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
Read it here:
http://www.secularstudents.org/node/1933
Hardly a suprise, given what a fundy loon Rupert is. Their network,
their rules, and all.
I know I can never bother going to their ad-laden, insecure, malware
distributing shitty web site again. (Not that I didn't know that
already.)
Murdoch is a sleaze. Because of media ownership laws, he took British
citizenship to take over the Times and build up his media empire in
the UK.
He sold his soul to Margaret Thatcher's Conservative Party to get the
rules changed so he could make it even bigger.
And his "unbiased journalism" ensured at least one general election
victory for her, with its vicious attacks on the opposition.
And then he got American citizenship to do the same here. Retaining
dual British citizenship so he could keep his media empire there.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy" |
|
| Title: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
31 Jan 2008 03:25:09 PM |
|
|
Christopher A. Lee <calee@optonline.net> wrote in
news:l4a4q3l0846h8cpaed8vt065d45lskgsd1@4ax.com:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:47:28 -0000, Gutless Umbrella Carrying
Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
nafc@snet.net wrote in news:52dbf279-ee8e-465a-8fb2-ef0662457a80
@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
Read it here:
http://www.secularstudents.org/node/1933
Hardly a suprise, given what a fundy loon Rupert is. Their
network, their rules, and all.
I know I can never bother going to their ad-laden, insecure,
malware distributing shitty web site again. (Not that I didn't
know that already.)
Murdoch is a sleaze.
Without any doubt.
--
Terry Austin
"There's no law west of the internet."
- Nick Stump
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
31 Jan 2008 09:49:01 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:59:50 -0500, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:47:28 -0000, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
<taustinca@gmail.com> wrote:
nafc@snet.net wrote in news:52dbf279-ee8e-465a-8fb2-ef0662457a80
@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
Read it here:
http://www.secularstudents.org/node/1933
Hardly a suprise, given what a fundy loon Rupert is. Their network,
their rules, and all.
I know I can never bother going to their ad-laden, insecure, malware
distributing shitty web site again. (Not that I didn't know that
already.)
Murdoch is a sleaze. Because of media ownership laws, he took British
citizenship to take over the Times and build up his media empire in
the UK.
He sold his soul to Margaret Thatcher's Conservative Party to get the
rules changed so he could make it even bigger.
And his "unbiased journalism" ensured at least one general election
victory for her, with its vicious attacks on the opposition.
And then he got American citizenship to do the same here. Retaining
dual British citizenship so he could keep his media empire there.
Yep.
That ***** is about the only thing that makes me ashamed to be from
his home town.
What the hell did we do wrong to create a voracious minster like him?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
31 Jan 2008 04:15:03 PM |
|
|
On Jan 31, 11:34=A0am, wrote:
Read it here:
http://www.secularstudents.org/node/1933
It'shard to see how it's considered Christian since it has buddhism as
a group there.
JM
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
31 Jan 2008 04:26:30 PM |
|
|
In article <a3021094-cea7-4bcd-a2d9-cbbfc229d1cd@l32g2000hse.googlegroups.com> writes:
On Jan 31, 11:34=A0am, wrote:
Read it here:
http://www.secularstudents.org/node/1933
It'shard to see how it's considered Christian since it has buddhism as
a group there.
The concept of gods is either missing or not important in many flavors of
Buddhism.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ye Old One" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
31 Jan 2008 05:01:24 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:15:03 -0800 (PST),
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On Jan 31, 11:34 am, wrote:
Read it here:
http://www.secularstudents.org/node/1933
It'shard to see how it's considered Christian since it has buddhism as
a group there.
JM
McClueless Video Challenge - day 20.
McPiltdown Deathmarch - Month 19.
TO censorship - still no examples.
Your dishonesty rating grows by the day McMoron and will do so as long
as you avoid facing up to these long outstanding questions.
--
Bob.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
31 Jan 2008 06:40:11 PM |
|
|
On Jan 31, 3:01=A0pm, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:15:03 -0800 (PST),
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On Jan 31, 11:34=A0am, wrote:
Read it here:
http://www.secularstudents.org/node/1933
It'shard to see how it's considered Christian since it has buddhism as
a group there.
JM
McClueless Video Challenge - day 20.
McPiltdown Deathmarch - Month 19.
TO censorship - still no examples.
Your dishonesty rating grows by the day McMoron and will do so as long
as you avoid facing up to these long outstanding questions.
--
Bob.
You claim that there are outstanding questions. What are they so I
can respond?
JM
.
|
|
|
| User: "Olrik" |
|
| Title: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
01 Feb 2008 12:14:33 AM |
|
|
On Jan 31, 7:40 pm, wrote:
On Jan 31, 3:01 pm, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:15:03 -0800 (PST),
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On Jan 31, 11:34 am, wrote:
Read it here:
http://www.secularstudents.org/node/1933
It'shard to see how it's considered Christian since it has buddhism as
a group there.
JM
McClueless Video Challenge - day 20.
McPiltdown Deathmarch - Month 19.
TO censorship - still no examples.
Your dishonesty rating grows by the day McMoron and will do so as long
as you avoid facing up to these long outstanding questions.
--
Bob.
You claim that there are outstanding questions. What are they so I
can respond?
You must be driving a Dodge...
O.
JM
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ye Old One" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
01 Feb 2008 02:59:06 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:40:11 -0800 (PST),
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On Jan 31, 3:01 pm, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:15:03 -0800 (PST),
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On Jan 31, 11:34 am, wrote:
Read it here:
http://www.secularstudents.org/node/1933
It'shard to see how it's considered Christian since it has buddhism as
a group there.
JM
McClueless Video Challenge - day 20.
McPiltdown Deathmarch - Month 19.
TO censorship - still no examples.
Your dishonesty rating grows by the day McMoron and will do so as long
as you avoid facing up to these long outstanding questions.
--
Bob.
You claim that there are outstanding questions. What are they so I
can respond?
JM
You know very well what they are McClueless.
McClueless Video Challenge - day 21.
McPiltdown Deathmarch - Month 19.
TO censorship - still no examples.
--
Bob.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
31 Jan 2008 08:12:25 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:40:11 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 31, 3:01 pm, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:15:03 -0800 (PST),
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On Jan 31, 11:34 am, wrote:
Read it here:
http://www.secularstudents.org/node/1933
It'shard to see how it's considered Christian since it has buddhism as
a group there.
JM
McClueless Video Challenge - day 20.
McPiltdown Deathmarch - Month 19.
TO censorship - still no examples.
Your dishonesty rating grows by the day McMoron and will do so as long
as you avoid facing up to these long outstanding questions.
--
Bob.
You claim that there are outstanding questions. What are they so I
can respond?
My question is not one of the three outstanding issues, but still
relevant: doesn't it bother you that you make Creationists look very,
very dishonest?
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
01 Feb 2008 01:01:17 AM |
|
|
On Jan 31, 6:12=A0pm, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:40:11 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 31, 3:01=A0pm, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:15:03 -0800 (PST),
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On Jan 31, 11:34=A0am, wrote:
Read it here:
http://www.secularstudents.org/node/1933
It'shard to see how it's considered Christian since it has buddhism as=
a group there.
JM
McClueless Video Challenge - day 20.
McPiltdown Deathmarch - Month 19.
TO censorship - still no examples.
Your dishonesty rating grows by the day McMoron and will do so as long
as you avoid facing up to these long outstanding questions.
--
Bob.
You claim that there are outstanding questions. =A0What are they so I
can respond?
My question is not one of the three outstanding issues, but still
relevant: doesn't it bother you that you make Creationists look very,
very dishonest?
In what way do I make creationists look very, very dishonest?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. Karl E. Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
01 Feb 2008 07:09:22 AM |
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
JM20000000@hotmail.com wrote:
| On Jan 31, 6:12 pm, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
|> On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:40:11 -0800 (PST),
|> wrote:
|>
|>
|>
|>> On Jan 31, 3:01 pm, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
|>>> On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:15:03 -0800 (PST),
|>>> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
|>>>> On Jan 31, 11:34 am, wrote:
|>>>>> Read it here:
|>>>>> http://www.secularstudents.org/node/1933
|>>>> It'shard to see how it's considered Christian since it has buddhism as
|>>>> a group there.
|>>>> JM
|>>> McClueless Video Challenge - day 20.
|>>> McPiltdown Deathmarch - Month 19.
|>>> TO censorship - still no examples.
|>>> Your dishonesty rating grows by the day McMoron and will do so as long
|>>> as you avoid facing up to these long outstanding questions.
|>>> --
|>>> Bob.
|>> You claim that there are outstanding questions. What are they so I
|>> can respond?
|> My question is not one of the three outstanding issues, but still
|> relevant: doesn't it bother you that you make Creationists look very,
|> very dishonest?
|
| In what way do I make creationists look very, very dishonest?
|
Posting claims and then running away when the questions get too tough
for you. (TO never censored you)
Opps, no wait, all creationist do that.
Okay, claim you have evidence and then make excuses when asked to
present it. (You never went to Turkey and video taped it)
Nope, damn it, all creationist do that too.
Ahha, find fault with scientist and say that their error is proof that
you are correct. (There are no text books in use today teaching Piltdown)
Well *****, all creationist do that one as well.
Well *****, a red letter day McNumbNuts. You actually are right about
something, you don't make creationists look like liars.
You fools don't need any help, you're all liars from the start.
- --
There are none more ignorant and useless,
than they that seek answers on their knees,
with their eyes closed.
____________________________________________________________________
Rev. Karl E. Taylor http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/
A.A #1143 http://scienceblogs.com/aardvarchaeology/
Apostle of Dr. Lao EAC: Virgin Conversion Unit Director
____________________________________________________________________
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHoxoCf+wl0F6+jvgRAmaHAJ9N/dGhZjae5IA7RoK9dEV3ctAsigCeLyQ0
Q4HZsAoG5YU5lMdAiFNzAvA=
=9tjp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
01 Feb 2008 07:30:28 PM |
|
|
wrote in
news:bd0a45f5-e13e-4c67-88a7-7ec233e47796@y5g2000hsf.googlegroups.com:
On Jan 31, 6:12 pm, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:40:11 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 31, 3:01 pm, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:15:03 -0800 (PST),
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On Jan 31, 11:34 am, wrote:
Read it here:
http://www.secularstudents.org/node/1933
It'shard to see how it's considered Christian since it has
buddhism as
a group there.
JM
McClueless Video Challenge - day 20.
McPiltdown Deathmarch - Month 19.
TO censorship - still no examples.
Your dishonesty rating grows by the day McMoron and will do so as
long as you avoid facing up to these long outstanding questions.
--
Bob.
You claim that there are outstanding questions. What are they so I
can respond?
My question is not one of the three outstanding issues, but still
relevant: doesn't it bother you that you make Creationists look very,
very dishonest?
In what way do I make creationists look very, very dishonest?
Two ways, actually.
1) Everything you say.
2) Everything you do.
HTH, SYLB, NFOYSSOB.
--
Doc Smartass, BAAWA Knight of Heckling
aa # 1939
"Whenever preachers appeal to hellfire as a way
of reinforcing injunctions, you can bet they have
failed to make a persuasive moral argument."
- James Carroll (Boston Globe)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Hatter" |
|
| Title: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
01 Feb 2008 07:22:09 AM |
|
|
On Feb 1, 2:01=A0am, wrote:
On Jan 31, 6:12=A0pm, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:40:11 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 31, 3:01=A0pm, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:15:03 -0800 (PST),
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On Jan 31, 11:34=A0am, wrote:
Read it here:
http://www.secularstudents.org/node/1933
It'shard to see how it's considered Christian since it has buddhism =
as
a group there.
JM
McClueless Video Challenge - day 20.
McPiltdown Deathmarch - Month 19.
TO censorship - still no examples.
Your dishonesty rating grows by the day McMoron and will do so as lon=
g
as you avoid facing up to these long outstanding questions.
--
Bob.
You claim that there are outstanding questions. =A0What are they so I
can respond?
My question is not one of the three outstanding issues, but still
relevant: doesn't it bother you that you make Creationists look very,
very dishonest?
In what way do I make creationists look very, very dishonest?- Hide quoted=
text -
- Show quoted text -
No more than the rest of them do. I.E. by saying anything.
Hatter
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ye Old One" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
01 Feb 2008 03:00:03 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:01:17 -0800 (PST),
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On Jan 31, 6:12 pm, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:40:11 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 31, 3:01 pm, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:15:03 -0800 (PST),
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On Jan 31, 11:34 am, wrote:
Read it here:
http://www.secularstudents.org/node/1933
It'shard to see how it's considered Christian since it has buddhism as
a group there.
JM
McClueless Video Challenge - day 20.
McPiltdown Deathmarch - Month 19.
TO censorship - still no examples.
Your dishonesty rating grows by the day McMoron and will do so as long
as you avoid facing up to these long outstanding questions.
--
Bob.
You claim that there are outstanding questions. What are they so I
can respond?
My question is not one of the three outstanding issues, but still
relevant: doesn't it bother you that you make Creationists look very,
very dishonest?
In what way do I make creationists look very, very dishonest?
YOU are very, very dishonest McClueless.
--
Bob.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
01 Feb 2008 10:27:58 AM |
|
|
On Feb 1, 1:00=A0am, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:01:17 -0800 (PST),
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On Jan 31, 6:12=A0pm, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:40:11 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 31, 3:01=A0pm, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:15:03 -0800 (PST),
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On Jan 31, 11:34=A0am, wrote:
Read it here:
http://www.secularstudents.org/node/1933
It'shard to see how it's considered Christian since it has buddhism=
as
a group there.
JM
McClueless Video Challenge - day 20.
McPiltdown Deathmarch - Month 19.
TO censorship - still no examples.
Your dishonesty rating grows by the day McMoron and will do so as lo=
ng
as you avoid facing up to these long outstanding questions.
--
Bob.
You claim that there are outstanding questions. =A0What are they so I
can respond?
My question is not one of the three outstanding issues, but still
relevant: doesn't it bother you that you make Creationists look very,
very dishonest?
In what way do I make creationists look very, very dishonest?
YOU are very, very dishonest McClueless.
How is that?
JM
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ye Old One" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
01 Feb 2008 05:26:53 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 08:27:58 -0800 (PST),
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On Feb 1, 1:00 am, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:01:17 -0800 (PST),
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On Jan 31, 6:12 pm, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:40:11 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 31, 3:01 pm, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:15:03 -0800 (PST),
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On Jan 31, 11:34 am, wrote:
Read it here:
http://www.secularstudents.org/node/1933
It'shard to see how it's considered Christian since it has buddhism as
a group there.
JM
McClueless Video Challenge - day 20.
McPiltdown Deathmarch - Month 19.
TO censorship - still no examples.
Your dishonesty rating grows by the day McMoron and will do so as long
as you avoid facing up to these long outstanding questions.
--
Bob.
You claim that there are outstanding questions. What are they so I
can respond?
My question is not one of the three outstanding issues, but still
relevant: doesn't it bother you that you make Creationists look very,
very dishonest?
In what way do I make creationists look very, very dishonest?
YOU are very, very dishonest McClueless.
How is that?
I don't know. Maybe it was watching your mother turning tricks the
warped your mind. Maybe it was the torrid sex with Ron 'The Con' Wyatt
that did it. Who knows?
JM
McClueless Video Challenge.
McPiltdown Deathmarch.
Evidence of censorship in talk.origins and google.
Those are the three things you need to concentrate your efforts on
McClueless - unless you want to carry on being considered the most
dishonest poster on this newsgroup.
--
Bob.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
01 Feb 2008 10:26:08 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:01:17 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 31, 6:12 pm, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:40:11 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 31, 3:01 pm, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:15:03 -0800 (PST),
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On Jan 31, 11:34 am, wrote:
Read it here:
http://www.secularstudents.org/node/1933
It'shard to see how it's considered Christian since it has buddhism as
a group there.
JM
McClueless Video Challenge - day 20.
McPiltdown Deathmarch - Month 19.
TO censorship - still no examples.
Your dishonesty rating grows by the day McMoron and will do so as long
as you avoid facing up to these long outstanding questions.
--
Bob.
You claim that there are outstanding questions. What are they so I
can respond?
My question is not one of the three outstanding issues, but still
relevant: doesn't it bother you that you make Creationists look very,
very dishonest?
In what way do I make creationists look very, very dishonest?
Hmm, shall we count the ways?
By spending the better part of a year trying to welch on a bet that
*you* offered.
By claiming that "millions" of textbooks cited Piltdown Man as
important evidence for evolution, but continuing to refuse to support
your claim by actually providing examples.
By claiming that you're being censored by Google Groups/talk.origins
after multiple people have explained to you that neither group does
such a thing, and explained to you exactly what the problem was.
By making fanciful claims about a video that you won't let anyone else
see.
By repeating the same old mistakes virtually every time you post, no
matter how many people correct you, and point out exactly *why* you're
wrong. (Admittedly, this could be attributed to issues with your
intelligence, rather than your honesty).
Shall I go on?
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
01 Feb 2008 10:32:59 AM |
|
|
On Feb 1, 8:26=A0am, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:01:17 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 31, 6:12=A0pm, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:40:11 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 31, 3:01=A0pm, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:15:03 -0800 (PST),
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On Jan 31, 11:34=A0am, wrote:
Read it here:
http://www.secularstudents.org/node/1933
It'shard to see how it's considered Christian since it has buddhism=
as
a group there.
JM
McClueless Video Challenge - day 20.
McPiltdown Deathmarch - Month 19.
TO censorship - still no examples.
Your dishonesty rating grows by the day McMoron and will do so as lo=
ng
as you avoid facing up to these long outstanding questions.
--
Bob.
You claim that there are outstanding questions. =A0What are they so I
can respond?
My question is not one of the three outstanding issues, but still
relevant: doesn't it bother you that you make Creationists look very,
very dishonest?
In what way do I make creationists look very, very dishonest?
Hmm, shall we count the ways?
By spending the better part of a year trying to welch on a bet that
*you* offered.
You mean the bet where Gen2rev (augray and whatever secret soc puppet
he has) tried to force me to pay him on a bet I never made to him but
to somebody else?
By claiming that "millions" of textbooks cited Piltdown Man as
important evidence for evolution, but continuing to refuse to support
your claim by actually providing examples.
I said there were millions of textbooks printed that contained
Piltdown Man as evidence to evolution. I never said anything in
regard to "important" evidence. It was all treated as equal with no
special significance toward any special apeman.
By claiming that you're being censored by Google Groups/talk.origins
after multiple people have explained to you that neither group does
such a thing, and explained to you exactly what the problem was.
There is definitely something wrong in that group as evidence by
individuals who have told me so and said so on publicly posted
messages on talk.origins. It happened to me it happened to them.
By making fanciful claims about a video that you won't let anyone else
see.
I see you play shell games.
JM
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ye Old One" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
01 Feb 2008 05:34:40 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 08:32:59 -0800 (PST),
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On Feb 1, 8:26 am, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:01:17 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 31, 6:12 pm, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:40:11 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 31, 3:01 pm, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:15:03 -0800 (PST),
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On Jan 31, 11:34 am, wrote:
Read it here:
http://www.secularstudents.org/node/1933
It'shard to see how it's considered Christian since it has buddhism as
a group there.
JM
McClueless Video Challenge - day 20.
McPiltdown Deathmarch - Month 19.
TO censorship - still no examples.
Your dishonesty rating grows by the day McMoron and will do so as long
as you avoid facing up to these long outstanding questions.
--
Bob.
You claim that there are outstanding questions. What are they so I
can respond?
My question is not one of the three outstanding issues, but still
relevant: doesn't it bother you that you make Creationists look very,
very dishonest?
In what way do I make creationists look very, very dishonest?
Hmm, shall we count the ways?
By spending the better part of a year trying to welch on a bet that
*you* offered.
You mean the bet where Gen2rev (augray and whatever secret soc puppet
he has) tried to force me to pay him on a bet I never made to him but
to somebody else?
You are a lying toe-rag. You know very well that you DID make the bet
and you LOST.
By claiming that "millions" of textbooks cited Piltdown Man as
important evidence for evolution, but continuing to refuse to support
your claim by actually providing examples.
I said there were millions of textbooks printed that contained
Piltdown Man as evidence to evolution.
It was 19 months ago that you started the McPiltdown Deathmarch. So
far have only posted a cite which accounts for 3,000 books. Where are
the rest?
I never said anything in
regard to "important" evidence. It was all treated as equal with no
special significance toward any special apeman.
There were not millions of school textbooks that used Piltdown Man to
convince (indoctrinate, brainwash) kids into believing in evolution.
You found 3,000 - what about the other 1,997,000?
By claiming that you're being censored by Google Groups/talk.origins
after multiple people have explained to you that neither group does
such a thing, and explained to you exactly what the problem was.
There is definitely something wrong in that group as evidence by
individuals who have told me so and said so on publicly posted
messages on talk.origins. It happened to me it happened to them.
Please provide evidence that a post of yours was censored - either by
TO or Google. Come on, put up or admit you lied.
By making fanciful claims about a video that you won't let anyone else
see.
I see you play shell games.
I see you lack the intelligence to play any games.
JM
--
Bob.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Augray" |
|
| Title: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
03 Feb 2008 04:19:04 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 08:32:59 -0800 (PST), wrote
in <6d50256c-cb74-41b9-82c3-036a47102b49@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
:
On Feb 1, 8:26 am, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:01:17 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 31, 6:12 pm, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:40:11 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 31, 3:01 pm, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:15:03 -0800 (PST),
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
[snip]
My question is not one of the three outstanding issues, but still
relevant: doesn't it bother you that you make Creationists look very,
very dishonest?
In what way do I make creationists look very, very dishonest?
Hmm, shall we count the ways?
By spending the better part of a year trying to welch on a bet that
*you* offered.
You mean the bet where Gen2rev (augray and whatever secret soc puppet
he has)
I've never used a sock puppet.
tried to force me to pay him on a bet I never made to him
If you never made a bet with me, why do you say that you did in
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.talk.creationism/msg/9657d516b1334aad
?
but
to somebody else?
Since you lost the bet, when are you going to pay this "somebody
else"?
[snip]
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
01 Feb 2008 10:52:17 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 08:32:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Feb 1, 8:26 am, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:01:17 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 31, 6:12 pm, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:40:11 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 31, 3:01 pm, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:15:03 -0800 (PST),
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On Jan 31, 11:34 am, wrote:
Read it here:
http://www.secularstudents.org/node/1933
It'shard to see how it's considered Christian since it has buddhism as
a group there.
JM
McClueless Video Challenge - day 20.
McPiltdown Deathmarch - Month 19.
TO censorship - still no examples.
Your dishonesty rating grows by the day McMoron and will do so as long
as you avoid facing up to these long outstanding questions.
--
Bob.
You claim that there are outstanding questions. What are they so I
can respond?
My question is not one of the three outstanding issues, but still
relevant: doesn't it bother you that you make Creationists look very,
very dishonest?
In what way do I make creationists look very, very dishonest?
Hmm, shall we count the ways?
By spending the better part of a year trying to welch on a bet that
*you* offered.
You mean the bet where Gen2rev (augray and whatever secret soc puppet
John, this is a good example of my point that you snipped (which is
another good example of your dishonesty): you look dishonest by
repeating the same old mistakes virtually every time you post, no
matter how many people correct you, and point out exactly *why* you're
wrong. (Admittedly, this could be attributed to issues with your
intelligence, rather than your honesty). The phrase is "sock puppet",
not "soc puppet". It comes from, <sarcastic "believe it or not">, the
image of someone wearing a sock on their hand as a puppet. It refers
to people posting under a different identity to voice support for
their own posts. At no time did this happen in those threads. I
suggest you learn how to read headers before you make paranoid
accusations.
he has) tried to force me to pay him on a bet I never made to him but
to somebody else?
We've gone over this one multiple times. You are the *only* person who
refuses to acknowledge that your bet was legitimate.
By claiming that "millions" of textbooks cited Piltdown Man as
important evidence for evolution, but continuing to refuse to support
your claim by actually providing examples.
I said there were millions of textbooks printed that contained
Piltdown Man as evidence to evolution.
And we're still waiting for examples...
I never said anything in
regard to "important" evidence. It was all treated as equal with no
special significance toward any special apeman.
And we're still waiting for examples...
By claiming that you're being censored by Google Groups/talk.origins
after multiple people have explained to you that neither group does
such a thing, and explained to you exactly what the problem was.
There is definitely something wrong in that group as evidence by
individuals who have told me so and said so on publicly posted
messages on talk.origins. It happened to me it happened to them.
Yes, McIdiot, you had it explained to you exactly what the problems
were, and censorship was not among them.
By making fanciful claims about a video that you won't let anyone else
see.
I see you play shell games.
Asking you to back up your claims is not a game.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
03 Feb 2008 03:15:53 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:12:25 -0500, raven1
<quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:40:11 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 31, 3:01 pm, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:15:03 -0800 (PST),
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On Jan 31, 11:34 am, wrote:
Read it here:
http://www.secularstudents.org/node/1933
It'shard to see how it's considered Christian since it has buddhism as
a group there.
JM
McClueless Video Challenge - day 20.
McPiltdown Deathmarch - Month 19.
TO censorship - still no examples.
Your dishonesty rating grows by the day McMoron and will do so as long
as you avoid facing up to these long outstanding questions.
--
Bob.
You claim that there are outstanding questions. What are they so I
can respond?
My question is not one of the three outstanding issues, but still
relevant: doesn't it bother you that you make Creationists look very,
very dishonest?
They already do without him - he's just the icing on the cake.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
31 Jan 2008 05:31:16 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:15:03 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 31, 11:34 am, wrote:
Read it here:
http://www.secularstudents.org/node/1933
It'shard to see how it's considered Christian since it has buddhism as
a group there.
Do you have some sort of bizarre obsession with making a stupid,
off-topic remark no matter what the subject is?
---
"Faith may not move mountains, but you should see what it does to skyscrapers..."
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "LEO" |
|
| Title: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
31 Jan 2008 04:04:45 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:34:38 -0800 (PST), wrote:
Read it here:
(...)
Research Finds that Atheists are Most Despised, Most Distrusted
Minority
The most recent data shows that atheists are more distrusted and
despised than any other minority and that an atheist is the least
likely person that Americans would vote for in a presidential
election. It's not just that atheists are hated, though, but also that
atheists seem to represent everything about modernity which Americans
dislike or fear.
The most recent study was conducted by the University of Minnesota,
which found that atheists ranked lower than "Muslims, recent
immigrants, gays and lesbians and other minority groups in 'sharing
their vision of American society.' Atheists are also the minority
group most Americans are least willing to allow their children to
marry." The results from two of the most important questions were:
This group does not at all agree with my vision of American society...
Atheist: 39.6%
Muslims: 26.3%
Homosexuals: 22.6%
Hispanics: 20%
Conservative Christians: 13.5%
Recent Immigrants: 12.5%
Jews: 7.6%
I would disapprove if my child wanted to marry a member of this
group....
Atheist: 47.6%
Muslim: 33.5%
African-American 27.2%
Asian-Americans: 18.5%
Hispanics: 18.5%
Jews: 11.8%
Conservative Christians: 6.9%
Whites: 2.3%
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hatter" |
|
| Title: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
01 Feb 2008 07:24:28 AM |
|
|
On Jan 31, 5:04=A0pm, LEO <l...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:34:38 -0800 (PST), wrote:
Read it here:
(...)
Research Finds that Atheists are Most Despised, Most Distrusted
Minority
Reason shows the argumentum ad populorum is such a crappy argument
they had a name for it being a crappy argument 2500 years ago.
Hatter
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
01 Feb 2008 05:13:58 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 05:24:28 -0800 (PST), Hatter <Hatter23@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Jan 31, 5:04Â pm, LEO <l...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:34:38 -0800 (PST), wrote:
Read it here:
(...)
Research Finds that Atheists are Most Despised, Most Distrusted
Minority
Reason shows the argumentum ad populorum is such a crappy argument
they had a name for it being a crappy argument 2500 years ago.
.... when we know that Greek atheists were being persecuted!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
31 Jan 2008 05:49:50 PM |
|
|
On Jan 31, 5:04=A0pm, LEO <l...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:34:38 -0800 (PST), wrote:
Read it here:
(...)
Research Finds that Atheists are Most Despised, Most Distrusted
Minority
=2E.in the US.
http://plig.org/things/pictures/tn/TheOtherOption-difference.med.jpg
-PF
.
|
|
|
| User: "LEO" |
|
| Title: Re: myspace discriminates against atheists |
31 Jan 2008 11:13:50 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:49:50 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 31, 5:04 pm, LEO <l...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:34:38 -0800 (PST), wrote:
Read it here:
(...)
Research Finds that Atheists are Most Despised, Most Distrusted
Minority
..in the US.
Right, and nowhere else means anything in the big picture..
-PF
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
