| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
02 Nov 2007 02:52:09 PM |
| Object: |
Myths about the Durupinar site |
1. That the formation is a rock formation. This is easily proven
false. On the Eastern side there is a core drilling. If you look
into it you will not nothing but earth. Not rock. It is soft. The
entire structure on the outside is soft. There are rock structures
in the formation that look like pillars or deck supports and also
cross beams. On the Western side is also a hole, that is big enough
to enter. It is soft material, not rock. Only supposed geologist
Lorence Collins says that it is rock. It's not rock it. And further,
he never went to the site.
2. "Ron Wyatt is a con who made it all up." Sure he did. But this is
disinformation and an attempt to attach the site to one man. The fact
is there was different work that was done on the site, and this work
was documented by video. The pattern of iron was documented, at one
point with Baumgardner holding the metal detector and Fasold holding
the camcorder.
3. A dowsing rod did all the work. The pattern of iron was
documented with a metal detector and camcorder. I did scientific
verification (along with 3 tour members that I met there) and found a
pattern of iron and documented it with HD camcorder. One of the
members wanted his picture taken with a metal detector, and as he
found iron it was decided impromptu to ribbon out the hotspots. The
tour member kept finding iron and so that portion was ribboned. This
was taken over by another member and I did a portion.
At any rate trying to blame Ron (who is deceased) on what a tour group
member from Canada did and the other people, certainly is dishonest
and an attempt to wrongfully attribute our hard and patient work to a
man who is no longer with us.
JM
.
|
|
| User: "Rev. Karl E. Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: Myths about the Durupinar site |
03 Nov 2007 10:18:16 AM |
|
|
wrote:
1. That the formation is a rock formation. This is easily proven
false. On the Eastern side there is a core drilling. If you look
into it you will not nothing but earth. Not rock. It is soft. The
entire structure on the outside is soft. There are rock structures
in the formation that look like pillars or deck supports and also
cross beams. On the Western side is also a hole, that is big enough
to enter. It is soft material, not rock. Only supposed geologist
Lorence Collins says that it is rock. It's not rock it. And further,
he never went to the site.
Name the peer reviewed journal(s) where this information can be
validated. Failure to do so brands your statements as lies.
2. "Ron Wyatt is a con who made it all up." Sure he did. But this is
disinformation and an attempt to attach the site to one man. The fact
is there was different work that was done on the site, and this work
was documented by video. The pattern of iron was documented, at one
point with Baumgardner holding the metal detector and Fasold holding
the camcorder.
Name the peer reviewed journal(s) where this information can be
validated. Failure to do so brands your statements as lies.
3. A dowsing rod did all the work. The pattern of iron was
documented with a metal detector and camcorder. I did scientific
verification (along with 3 tour members that I met there) and found a
pattern of iron and documented it with HD camcorder. One of the
members wanted his picture taken with a metal detector, and as he
found iron it was decided impromptu to ribbon out the hotspots. The
tour member kept finding iron and so that portion was ribboned. This
was taken over by another member and I did a portion.
Name the peer reviewed journal(s) where this information can be
validated. Failure to do so brands your statements as lies.
Name the organization(s) that funded your expedition. Failure to do so
brands your statements as lies.
At any rate trying to blame Ron (who is deceased) on what a tour group
member from Canada did and the other people, certainly is dishonest
and an attempt to wrongfully attribute our hard and patient work to a
man who is no longer with us.
Work you refuse to submit to peer review. That is, if you actually went
anywhere at all.
You are a liar nameless, and you have been shown as such by many people
in these news groups. I'd suggest you give it up bub. We're not
laughing with you, we are laughing at you.
--
There are none more ignorant and useless,
than they that seek answers on their knees,
with their eyes closed.
____________________________________________________________________
Rev. Karl E. Taylor
A.A #1143 PLONKED by Bob
Apostle of Dr. Lao EAC: Virgin Conversion Unit Director
____________________________________________________________________
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ye Old One" |
|
| Title: Re: Myths about the Durupinar site |
02 Nov 2007 04:34:43 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:52:09 -0700, enriched this
group when s/he wrote:
1. That the formation is a rock formation.
That is correct McClueless.
This is easily proven
false. On the Eastern side there is a core drilling. If you look
into it you will not nothing but earth.
Was that suppose to be English McClueless?
Not rock. It is soft. The
entire structure on the outside is soft.
Nobody takes your word for anything McClueless.
There are rock structures
in the formation that look like pillars or deck supports and also
cross beams. On the Western side is also a hole, that is big enough
to enter. It is soft material, not rock. Only supposed geologist
Lorence Collins says that it is rock. It's not rock it.
True McClueless, and it is not science either.
And further,
he never went to the site.
2. "Ron Wyatt is a con who made it all up." Sure he did.
We know that McClueless.
But this is
disinformation and an attempt to attach the site to one man.
Was it, or was it not, Ron 'The Con' Wyatt's expedition?
The fact
is there was different work that was done on the site, and this work
was documented by video.
Oh not the mythical video again McClueless.
The pattern of iron was documented, at one
point with Baumgardner holding the metal detector and Fasold holding
the camcorder.
Metal detectors would have been useless on the site McClueless.
3. A dowsing rod did all the work. The pattern of iron was
documented with a metal detector and camcorder.
The pattern was laid out by dowsing.
I did scientific
verification
No you didn't you lying little toerag. You are scientifically
illiterate and incapable of doing ANY form of scientific work.
(along with 3 tour members that I met there) and found a
pattern of iron and documented it with HD camcorder.
What your was that McClueless?
One of the
members wanted his picture taken with a metal detector, and as he
found iron it was decided impromptu to ribbon out the hotspots. The
tour member kept finding iron and so that portion was ribboned. This
was taken over by another member and I did a portion.
Cheap metal detectors would have been useless on that site McClueless.
At any rate trying to blame Ron (who is deceased) on what a tour group
member from Canada did and the other people, certainly is dishonest
No, what Ron 'The Con' Wyatt did was dishonest. He was a crook, his
organization was rotten to the core.
and an attempt to wrongfully attribute our hard and patient work to a
man who is no longer with us.
As I've said before, it is sad Ron 'The Con' Wyatt is not here to face
the music, he would be doing time by now.
JM
--
Bob.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dubh Ghall" |
|
| Title: Re: Myths about the Durupinar site |
04 Nov 2007 08:31:25 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:34:43 GMT, Ye Old One <usenet@mcsuk.net> wrote:
One of the
members wanted his picture taken with a metal detector, and as he
found iron it was decided impromptu to ribbon out the hotspots. The
tour member kept finding iron and so that portion was ribboned. This
was taken over by another member and I did a portion.
Cheap metal detectors would have been useless on that site McClueless.
Why were they looking for Iron nails, on what is supposedly the site
of a bronze age, artifact?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ye Old One" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Myths about the Durupinar site |
04 Nov 2007 03:00:22 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 14:31:25 GMT, Dubh Ghall <puck@pooks.hill.fey>
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:34:43 GMT, Ye Old One <usenet@mcsuk.net> wrote:
One of the
members wanted his picture taken with a metal detector, and as he
found iron it was decided impromptu to ribbon out the hotspots. The
tour member kept finding iron and so that portion was ribboned. This
was taken over by another member and I did a portion.
Cheap metal detectors would have been useless on that site McClueless.
Why were they looking for Iron nails, on what is supposedly the site
of a bronze age, artifact?
Many people have taken many hours to try and explain to McClueless the
rarity of iron at the point in the bronze age when the ark was
supposed to have been built. However, he knows stone age tribes in
Africa that smelt iron so they must have been able to do it even back
in the Garden of Eden. He will not believe that iron in the bronze age
was so rare it was far more valuable than gold and that almost all of
it came from meteorites.
But then, McClueless never believes anything real.
--
Bob.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dubh Ghall" |
|
| Title: Re: Myths about the Durupinar site |
05 Nov 2007 06:11:49 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 21:00:22 GMT, Ye Old One <usenet@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 14:31:25 GMT, Dubh Ghall <puck@pooks.hill.fey>
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:34:43 GMT, Ye Old One <usenet@mcsuk.net> wrote:
One of the
members wanted his picture taken with a metal detector, and as he
found iron it was decided impromptu to ribbon out the hotspots. The
tour member kept finding iron and so that portion was ribboned. This
was taken over by another member and I did a portion.
Cheap metal detectors would have been useless on that site McClueless.
Why were they looking for Iron nails, on what is supposedly the site
of a bronze age, artifact?
Many people have taken many hours to try and explain to McClueless the
rarity of iron at the point in the bronze age when the ark was
supposed to have been built. However, he knows stone age tribes in
Africa that smelt iron so they must have been able to do it even back
in the Garden of Eden. He will not believe that iron in the bronze age
was so rare it was far more valuable than gold and that almost all of
it came from meteorites.
But then, McClueless never believes anything real.
I suspect that if that guy had a dollar, for every brain cell he has,
he would be in debt.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Myths about the Durupinar site |
03 Nov 2007 04:22:55 PM |
|
|
On Nov 2, 2:34 pm, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
Bobbie, obtaining metal readings depends on how deep the metal is and
what size loop you have on your detector. The fact is I obtained
readings as did three others who were on a tour group at the time.
No Bobbie, it's real no matter how you wish to look at it.
JM
--
Bob.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ye Old One" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Myths about the Durupinar site |
04 Nov 2007 11:15:53 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 14:22:55 -0700, enriched this
group when s/he wrote:
On Nov 2, 2:34 pm, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
Bobbie, obtaining metal readings depends on how deep the metal is and
what size loop you have on your detector.
It depends on a lot more than that McClueless.
The fact is I obtained
readings as did three others who were on a tour group at the time.
No Bobbie, it's real no matter how you wish to look at it.
I'm sure you did get readings McClueless, but one thing I'm even more
sure of is that they did not come from that INCREDIBLY rare thing -
iron from the bronze age.
JM
--
Bob.
Silly sig McClueless.
--
Bob.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Myths about the Durupinar site |
12 Nov 2007 08:50:56 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:52:09 -0700, wrote:
1. That the formation is a rock formation. This is easily proven
false. On the Eastern side there is a core drilling. If you look
into it you will not nothing but earth. Not rock. It is soft. The
entire structure on the outside is soft. There are rock structures
in the formation that look like pillars or deck supports and also
cross beams. On the Western side is also a hole, that is big enough
to enter. It is soft material, not rock. Only supposed geologist
Lorence Collins says that it is rock. It's not rock it. And further,
he never went to the site.
2. "Ron Wyatt is a con who made it all up." Sure he did. But this is
disinformation and an attempt to attach the site to one man. The fact
is there was different work that was done on the site, and this work
was documented by video. The pattern of iron was documented, at one
point with Baumgardner holding the metal detector and Fasold holding
the camcorder.
3. A dowsing rod did all the work. The pattern of iron was
documented with a metal detector and camcorder. I did scientific
verification (along with 3 tour members that I met there) and found a
pattern of iron and documented it with HD camcorder. One of the
members wanted his picture taken with a metal detector, and as he
found iron it was decided impromptu to ribbon out the hotspots. The
tour member kept finding iron and so that portion was ribboned. This
was taken over by another member and I did a portion.
At any rate trying to blame Ron (who is deceased) on what a tour group
member from Canada did and the other people, certainly is dishonest
and an attempt to wrongfully attribute our hard and patient work to a
man who is no longer with us.
Nameless, ***** with this ancient ruptured stupidity. No one cares
about your obsession with this idiocy.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Myths about the Durupinar site |
03 Nov 2007 12:27:21 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:52:09 -0700, wrote:
2. "Ron Wyatt is a con who made it all up." Sure he did.
A rare display of honesty on your part, McIdiot.
---
"Faith may not move mountains, but you should see what it does to skyscrapers..."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dubh Ghall" |
|
| Title: Re: Myths about the Durupinar site |
04 Nov 2007 08:01:19 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:52:09 -0700, wrote:
At any rate trying to blame Ron (who is deceased) on what a tour group
member from Canada did and the other people, certainly is dishonest
and an attempt to wrongfully attribute our hard and patient work to a
man who is no longer with us.
Now what are you waffling about?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Myths about the Durupinar site |
02 Nov 2007 04:07:40 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:52:09 -0700, wrote:
Yawn.
--
Al at Webdingers dot com
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate."
- Richard Dawkins
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Myths about the Durupinar site |
02 Nov 2007 08:28:24 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:52:09 -0700, mccoy wrote:
1. Shut up.
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
“The time must come inevitably when mankind shall
surmount the imbecility of religion, as it has surmounted
the imbecility of religion's ally, magic. It is impossible
to imagine this world being really civilized so long as
so much nonsense survives.”
- H. L. Mencken
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Myths about the Durupinar site |
05 Nov 2007 06:18:02 PM |
|
|
On Nov 2, 2:52 pm, wrote:
snip
1.) That it is the remains of the mythical "Noah's Ark" mentioned in
Judeo-Christian mythology.
You're welcome.
-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015/KoBAAWA!
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
