Religions > Atheism > NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense.
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
22 Sep 2007 10:24:02 PM |
| Object: |
NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
NAMBLA's goal is to end the extreme oppression of men and boys in
mutually consensual relationships by educating the public on the
benevolent nature of man/boy love, and working to abolish age-of-
consent laws.
NAMBLA calls for the empowerment of youth in all areas, not just the
sexual. We support greater economic, political and social
opportunities for young people and denounce the rampant ageism that
segregates and isolates them in fear and mistrust. We support the
rights of youth as well as adults to choose the partners with whom
they wish to share and enjoy their bodies.
In light of the mis-directed public hysteria toward God-loving Roman
Catholic clergy involved in Christian love relationships with boys in
their congregations, it's time the Church embraced NAMBLA and helped
work to bring about its general acceptance.
I believe in God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost, and
I also believe in progress. Church acceptance of NAMBLA is long
overdue.
.
|
|
| User: "Scruffy McScruffovitch" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
23 Sep 2007 05:16:54 AM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngsinsights@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1190517842.760366.289520@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
I believe in God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost, and
I also believe in progress. Church acceptance of NAMBLA is long
overdue.
Overdue? What are you talking about? The Catholic Church has embraced and
protected man/boy love for decades, perhaps centuries now. The whole
organization is corrupt from the Pope on down.
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
23 Sep 2007 09:59:59 AM |
|
|
"Scruffy McScruffovitch" <Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> writes:
"J Young" <youngsinsights@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1190517842.760366.289520@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
I believe in God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost, and
I also believe in progress. Church acceptance of NAMBLA is long
overdue.
Overdue? What are you talking about? The Catholic Church has
embraced and protected man/boy love for decades, perhaps centuries
now. The whole organization is corrupt from the Pope on down.
It's most likely a forgery - the email address is
youngsinsights@yahoo.com whereas "our" J Young seems to use
younginsights@yahoo.com (differing by a single 's').
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sniper .308" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
23 Sep 2007 01:53:37 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 14:59:59 GMT, No One <noone@nospam.pacbell.net>
wrote:
It's most likely a forgery - the email address is
youngsinsights@yahoo.com whereas "our" J Young seems to use
younginsights@yahoo.com (differing by a single 's').
From: J Young <younginsights@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.flame.faggots
Subject: Please ***** On Me
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:09:49 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 3
Message-ID: <1190426989.043052.153190@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1190426989 8503 127.0.0.1 (22 Sep 2007
02:09:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:09:49 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.8.1.7) Gecko/20070914 Firefox/2.0.0.7,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To:
From: bobandcarole <bobandcarole000@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.atheism,alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic,alt.abortion,soc.culture.jewish
Subject: Yoo Hoo! ***** J Young! It's humiliation time! :-)
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 17:01:14 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <1190505674.524169.143170@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1190505674 26247 127.0.0.1 (23 Sep 2007
00:01:14 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 00:01:14 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.8.1.7) Gecko/20070914 Firefox/2.0.0.7,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To:
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
23 Sep 2007 05:33:57 PM |
|
|
In article <1190517842.760366.289520@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>, J
Young <youngsinsights@yahoo.com> wrote:
NAMBLA's goal is to end the extreme oppression of men and boys in
mutually consensual relationships by educating the public on the
benevolent nature of man/boy love, and working to abolish age-of-
consent laws.
NAMBLA calls for the empowerment of youth in all areas, not just the
sexual. We support greater economic, political and social
opportunities for young people and denounce the rampant ageism that
segregates and isolates them in fear and mistrust. We support the
rights of youth as well as adults to choose the partners with whom
they wish to share and enjoy their bodies.
In light of the mis-directed public hysteria toward God-loving Roman
Catholic clergy involved in Christian love relationships with boys in
their congregations, it's time the Church embraced NAMBLA and helped
work to bring about its general acceptance.
I believe in God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost, and
I also believe in progress. Church acceptance of NAMBLA is long
overdue.
Saying NAMBLA and the Catholic Church have differing agenda¹s is like
says guards and correctional officers do different things. Not really
- it is just semantics.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
23 Sep 2007 09:51:35 AM |
|
|
J Young <youngsinsights@yahoo.com> wrote in news:1190517842.760366.289520
@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
Subject: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism.
The big difference is that NAMBLA is just North America; RC is
international.
--
Doc Smartass, BAAWA Knight of Heckling
aa # 1939
No one can terrorize a whole nation, unless we are all his accomplices.
--Edward R. Murrow
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
23 Sep 2007 12:37:59 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 20:24:02 -0700, J Young <youngsinsights@yahoo.com> wrote:
In light of the mis-directed public hysteria toward God-loving Roman
Catholic clergy involved in Christian love relationships with boys in
their congregations,
The Catholic Church rejects clergy involved with boys. It is a mortal sin.
I believe in God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost, and
I also believe in progress. Church acceptance of NAMBLA is long
overdue.
Quite the opposite is the final product.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Scruffy McScruffovitch" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
23 Sep 2007 01:41:08 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:t19df3ppf0qbkidvrp64ffrdtoqijsnori@4ax.com...
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 20:24:02 -0700, J Young <youngsinsights@yahoo.com>
wrote:
In light of the mis-directed public hysteria toward God-loving Roman
Catholic clergy involved in Christian love relationships with boys in
their congregations,
The Catholic Church rejects clergy involved with boys. It is a mortal
sin.
*****. The Catholic Church has been enabling and protecting clergy
involved with boys for decades, and probably centuries.
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
23 Sep 2007 03:27:47 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 14:41:08 -0400, "Scruffy McScruffovitch" <Scruffy_1@FAM.NET>
wrote:
The Catholic Church rejects clergy involved with boys. It is a mortal
sin.
*****. The Catholic Church has been enabling and protecting clergy
involved with boys for decades, and probably centuries.
You try to sound like you know what you're talking about. I say you don't. So
this is your chance to show me wrong. Can you do it?
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Scruffy McScruffovitch" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
23 Sep 2007 03:30:23 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:i0jdf3pacoei6jm11s4q0nkdhtiqe27153@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 14:41:08 -0400, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET>
wrote:
The Catholic Church rejects clergy involved with boys. It is a mortal
sin.
*****. The Catholic Church has been enabling and protecting clergy
involved with boys for decades, and probably centuries.
You try to sound like you know what you're talking about
That's because it's not a well known, established, and court proven fact.
Hence the $2 billion in damages that has been settled, and awarded to the
Church's victims.
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
23 Sep 2007 04:56:55 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 16:30:23 -0400, "Scruffy McScruffovitch" <Scruffy_1@FAM.NET>
wrote:
The Catholic Church rejects clergy involved with boys. It is a mortal
sin.
*****. The Catholic Church has been enabling and protecting clergy
involved with boys for decades, and probably centuries.
You try to sound like you know what you're talking about
That's because it's not a well known, established, and court proven fact.
Then you don't know either.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Scruffy McScruffovitch" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
23 Sep 2007 05:40:47 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:d8odf3hnohsrbhmacrqf109liduhj0kt76@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 16:30:23 -0400, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET>
wrote:
The Catholic Church rejects clergy involved with boys. It is a mortal
sin.
*****. The Catholic Church has been enabling and protecting clergy
involved with boys for decades, and probably centuries.
You try to sound like you know what you're talking about
That's because it's not a well known, established, and court proven fact.
Then you don't know either.
Typo on my part, that should have read: "That's because it's a well known,
established, and court proven fact.
So yes, we do know.
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
24 Sep 2007 05:24:28 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 18:40:47 -0400, "Scruffy McScruffovitch" <Scruffy_1@FAM.NET>
wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:d8odf3hnohsrbhmacrqf109liduhj0kt76@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 16:30:23 -0400, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET>
wrote:
The Catholic Church rejects clergy involved with boys. It is a mortal
sin.
*****. The Catholic Church has been enabling and protecting clergy
involved with boys for decades, and probably centuries.
You try to sound like you know what you're talking about
That's because it's not a well known, established, and court proven fact.
Then you don't know either.
Typo on my part, that should have read: "That's because it's a well known,
established, and court proven fact.
So yes, we do know.
Then you don't know either. A few accusations does not a common practice make.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Scruffy McScruffovitch" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
24 Sep 2007 05:59:15 AM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:fv3ff3tfno82j3k7iedob3c4ui5has5kmi@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 18:40:47 -0400, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET>
wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:d8odf3hnohsrbhmacrqf109liduhj0kt76@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 16:30:23 -0400, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET>
wrote:
The Catholic Church rejects clergy involved with boys. It is a
mortal
sin.
*****. The Catholic Church has been enabling and protecting
clergy
involved with boys for decades, and probably centuries.
You try to sound like you know what you're talking about
That's because it's not a well known, established, and court proven
fact.
Then you don't know either.
Typo on my part, that should have read: "That's because it's a well known,
established, and court proven fact.
So yes, we do know.
Then you don't know either. A few accusations does not a common practice
make.
Yes, we do know, because it is FAR and AWAY more than a few accusations,
with more coming in every day. Over $2 Billion in settlements and
judgements don't lie. Of course, you do, quite often.
.
|
|
|
| User: "•R L Measures" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
24 Sep 2007 10:04:25 AM |
|
|
In article <13ff646e48s2568@corp.supernews.com>, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:fv3ff3tfno82j3k7iedob3c4ui5has5kmi@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 18:40:47 -0400, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET>
wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:d8odf3hnohsrbhmacrqf109liduhj0kt76@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 16:30:23 -0400, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET>
wrote:
The Catholic Church rejects clergy involved with boys. It is a
mortal
sin.
*****. The Catholic Church has been enabling and protecting
clergy
involved with boys for decades, and probably centuries.
You try to sound like you know what you're talking about
That's because it's not a well known, established, and court proven
fact.
Then you don't know either.
Typo on my part, that should have read: "That's because it's a well known,
established, and court proven fact.
So yes, we do know.
Then you don't know either. A few accusations does not a common practice
make.
Yes, we do know, because it is FAR and AWAY more than a few accusations,
with more coming in every day. Over $2 Billion in settlements and
judgements don't lie. Of course, you do, quite often.
• ... and almost all of the >2,000 altar-boys lied.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Scruffy McScruffovitch" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
24 Sep 2007 10:11:09 AM |
|
|
".R L Measures" <r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:r-2409070804250001@66-52-38-118.lsan.dock.net...
In article <13ff646e48s2568@corp.supernews.com>, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:fv3ff3tfno82j3k7iedob3c4ui5has5kmi@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 18:40:47 -0400, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET>
wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:d8odf3hnohsrbhmacrqf109liduhj0kt76@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 16:30:23 -0400, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET>
wrote:
The Catholic Church rejects clergy involved with boys. It is a
mortal
sin.
*****. The Catholic Church has been enabling and protecting
clergy
involved with boys for decades, and probably centuries.
You try to sound like you know what you're talking about
That's because it's not a well known, established, and court proven
fact.
Then you don't know either.
Typo on my part, that should have read: "That's because it's a well
known,
established, and court proven fact.
So yes, we do know.
Then you don't know either. A few accusations does not a common
practice
make.
Yes, we do know, because it is FAR and AWAY more than a few accusations,
with more coming in every day. Over $2 Billion in settlements and
judgements don't lie. Of course, you do, quite often.
. ... and almost all of the >2,000 altar-boys lied.
LOL! Yep, according to Duke, that's probably the way he thinks.
.
|
|
|
| User: "•R L Measures" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
24 Sep 2007 04:22:05 PM |
|
|
In article <13ffksgpg831f08@corp.supernews.com>, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote:
".R L Measures" <r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:r-2409070804250001@66-52-38-118.lsan.dock.net...
In article <13ff646e48s2568@corp.supernews.com>, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:fv3ff3tfno82j3k7iedob3c4ui5has5kmi@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 18:40:47 -0400, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET>
wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:d8odf3hnohsrbhmacrqf109liduhj0kt76@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 16:30:23 -0400, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET>
wrote:
The Catholic Church rejects clergy involved with boys. It is a
mortal
sin.
*****. The Catholic Church has been enabling and protecting
clergy
involved with boys for decades, and probably centuries.
You try to sound like you know what you're talking about
That's because it's not a well known, established, and court proven
fact.
Then you don't know either.
Typo on my part, that should have read: "That's because it's a well
known,
established, and court proven fact.
So yes, we do know.
Then you don't know either. A few accusations does not a common
practice
make.
Yes, we do know, because it is FAR and AWAY more than a few accusations,
with more coming in every day. Over $2 Billion in settlements and
judgements don't lie. Of course, you do, quite often.
. ... and almost all of the >2,000 altar-boys lied.
LOL! Yep, according to Duke, that's probably the way he thinks.
** hook, line, and sinker.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
24 Sep 2007 03:20:54 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:11:09 -0400, "Scruffy McScruffovitch" <Scruffy_1@FAM.NET>
wrote:
. ... and almost all of the >2,000 altar-boys lied.
LOL! Yep, according to Duke, that's probably the way he thinks.
How many of the >2000 took the stand?
Why did the child victims parents say "give me the money" rather than push for a
trial?
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Scruffy McScruffovitch" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
24 Sep 2007 03:24:42 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:7u6gf35h9b9coo9cf0f9h77pv90jphrbgn@4ax.com...
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:11:09 -0400, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET>
wrote:
. ... and almost all of the >2,000 altar-boys lied.
LOL! Yep, according to Duke, that's probably the way he thinks.
How many of the >2000 took the stand?
How many of the >2000 did not file depositions and complaints?
Why did the child victims parents say "give me the money" rather than push
for a
trial?
Why would the Church push to pay over $2,000,000,000.00 if there was no
guilt?
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
24 Sep 2007 03:59:50 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:24:42 -0400, "Scruffy McScruffovitch" <Scruffy_1@FAM.NET>
wrote:
. ... and almost all of the >2,000 altar-boys lied.
LOL! Yep, according to Duke, that's probably the way he thinks.
How many of the >2000 took the stand?
How many of the >2000 did not file depositions and complaints?
I don't know, but none took the stand and all got rich.
Why did the child victims parents say "give me the money" rather than push
for a
trial?
Why would the Church push to pay over $2,000,000,000.00 if there was no
guilt?
My guess - to avoid the heartbreak to victim and accused alike over an extended
trial with 2000 victims testifying and endless lineup of other witnesses. Now
$2 billion is a lot of heartbreak, I certainly admit. All the 2000 became
millionaires, involved or not.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Scruffy McScruffovitch" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
24 Sep 2007 07:52:31 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:ku8gf3l65roljblv49u3vu0h3g0stfcirr@4ax.com...
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:24:42 -0400, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET>
wrote:
. ... and almost all of the >2,000 altar-boys lied.
LOL! Yep, according to Duke, that's probably the way he thinks.
How many of the >2000 took the stand?
How many of the >2000 did not file depositions and complaints?
I don't know, but none took the stand and all got rich.
Why did the child victims parents say "give me the money" rather than
push
for a
trial?
Why would the Church push to pay over $2,000,000,000.00 if there was no
guilt?
My guess - to avoid the heartbreak to victim and accused alike over an
extended
trial with 2000 victims testifying and endless lineup of other witnesses.
*****...
"The church has failed in its duties to protect the weakest members of our
congregations. We can no longer turn a blind eye to these attrocities."
Archbishop Patrick O'Malley, July 31st, 2003, shortly after arriving at his
new post in Boston.
.
|
|
|
| User: "•R L Measures" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
25 Sep 2007 06:45:26 AM |
|
|
In article <13fgmuq5pv48f51@corp.supernews.com>, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:ku8gf3l65roljblv49u3vu0h3g0stfcirr@4ax.com...
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:24:42 -0400, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET>
wrote:
. ... and almost all of the >2,000 altar-boys lied.
LOL! Yep, according to Duke, that's probably the way he thinks.
How many of the >2000 took the stand?
How many of the >2000 did not file depositions and complaints?
I don't know, but none took the stand and all got rich.
Why did the child victims parents say "give me the money" rather than
push
for a
trial?
Why would the Church push to pay over $2,000,000,000.00 if there was no
guilt?
My guess - to avoid the heartbreak to victim and accused alike over an
extended
trial with 2000 victims testifying and endless lineup of other witnesses.
*****...
"The church has failed in its duties to protect the weakest members of our
congregations. We can no longer turn a blind eye to these attrocities."
Archbishop Patrick O'Malley, July 31st, 2003, shortly after arriving at his
new post in Boston.
** OUCH
.
|
|
|
| User: "Scruffy McScruffovitch" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
25 Sep 2007 07:31:33 AM |
|
|
".R L Measures" <r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:r-2509070445260001@66-52-38-5.lsan.dock.net...
In article <13fgmuq5pv48f51@corp.supernews.com>, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:ku8gf3l65roljblv49u3vu0h3g0stfcirr@4ax.com...
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:24:42 -0400, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET>
wrote:
. ... and almost all of the >2,000 altar-boys lied.
LOL! Yep, according to Duke, that's probably the way he thinks.
How many of the >2000 took the stand?
How many of the >2000 did not file depositions and complaints?
I don't know, but none took the stand and all got rich.
Why did the child victims parents say "give me the money" rather than
push
for a
trial?
Why would the Church push to pay over $2,000,000,000.00 if there was no
guilt?
My guess - to avoid the heartbreak to victim and accused alike over an
extended
trial with 2000 victims testifying and endless lineup of other
witnesses.
*****...
"The church has failed in its duties to protect the weakest members of
our
congregations. We can no longer turn a blind eye to these attrocities."
Archbishop Patrick O'Malley, July 31st, 2003, shortly after arriving at
his
new post in Boston.
** OUCH
duke doesn't even listen to his own church leaders who have admitted the
church's cupability in these matters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "•R L Measures" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
25 Sep 2007 08:56:19 PM |
|
|
In article <13fhvt6npi1sn8c@corp.supernews.com>, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote:
".R L Measures" <r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:r-2509070445260001@66-52-38-5.lsan.dock.net...
In article <13fgmuq5pv48f51@corp.supernews.com>, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:ku8gf3l65roljblv49u3vu0h3g0stfcirr@4ax.com...
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:24:42 -0400, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET>
wrote:
. ... and almost all of the >2,000 altar-boys lied.
LOL! Yep, according to Duke, that's probably the way he thinks.
How many of the >2000 took the stand?
How many of the >2000 did not file depositions and complaints?
I don't know, but none took the stand and all got rich.
Why did the child victims parents say "give me the money" rather than
push
for a
trial?
Why would the Church push to pay over $2,000,000,000.00 if there was no
guilt?
My guess - to avoid the heartbreak to victim and accused alike over an
extended
trial with 2000 victims testifying and endless lineup of other
witnesses.
*****...
"The church has failed in its duties to protect the weakest members of
our
congregations. We can no longer turn a blind eye to these attrocities."
Archbishop Patrick O'Malley, July 31st, 2003, shortly after arriving at
his
new post in Boston.
** OUCH
duke doesn't even listen to his own church leaders who have admitted the
church's cupability in these matters.
** amazing
.
|
|
|
| User: "Scruffy McScruffovitch" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
25 Sep 2007 09:11:22 PM |
|
|
".R L Measures" <r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:r-2509071856190001@66-52-38-98.lsan.dock.net...
In article <13fhvt6npi1sn8c@corp.supernews.com>, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote:
".R L Measures" <r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:r-2509070445260001@66-52-38-5.lsan.dock.net...
In article <13fgmuq5pv48f51@corp.supernews.com>, "Scruffy
McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:ku8gf3l65roljblv49u3vu0h3g0stfcirr@4ax.com...
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:24:42 -0400, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET>
wrote:
. ... and almost all of the >2,000 altar-boys lied.
LOL! Yep, according to Duke, that's probably the way he thinks.
How many of the >2000 took the stand?
How many of the >2000 did not file depositions and complaints?
I don't know, but none took the stand and all got rich.
Why did the child victims parents say "give me the money" rather
than
push
for a
trial?
Why would the Church push to pay over $2,000,000,000.00 if there was
no
guilt?
My guess - to avoid the heartbreak to victim and accused alike over
an
extended
trial with 2000 victims testifying and endless lineup of other
witnesses.
*****...
"The church has failed in its duties to protect the weakest members of
our
congregations. We can no longer turn a blind eye to these
attrocities."
Archbishop Patrick O'Malley, July 31st, 2003, shortly after arriving
at
his
new post in Boston.
** OUCH
duke doesn't even listen to his own church leaders who have admitted the
church's cupability in these matters.
** amazing
It would be even more amazing if I spelt culpability correctly. :)
.
|
|
|
| User: "•R L Measures" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
26 Sep 2007 07:24:09 AM |
|
|
In article <13fjfukaqro1f6d@corp.supernews.com>, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote:
".R L Measures" <r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:r-2509071856190001@66-52-38-98.lsan.dock.net...
In article <13fhvt6npi1sn8c@corp.supernews.com>, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote:
".R L Measures" <r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:r-2509070445260001@66-52-38-5.lsan.dock.net...
In article <13fgmuq5pv48f51@corp.supernews.com>, "Scruffy
McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:ku8gf3l65roljblv49u3vu0h3g0stfcirr@4ax.com...
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:24:42 -0400, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET>
wrote:
. ... and almost all of the >2,000 altar-boys lied.
LOL! Yep, according to Duke, that's probably the way he thinks.
How many of the >2000 took the stand?
How many of the >2000 did not file depositions and complaints?
I don't know, but none took the stand and all got rich.
Why did the child victims parents say "give me the money" rather
than
push
for a
trial?
Why would the Church push to pay over $2,000,000,000.00 if there was
no
guilt?
My guess - to avoid the heartbreak to victim and accused alike over
an
extended
trial with 2000 victims testifying and endless lineup of other
witnesses.
*****...
"The church has failed in its duties to protect the weakest members of
our
congregations. We can no longer turn a blind eye to these
attrocities."
Archbishop Patrick O'Malley, July 31st, 2003, shortly after arriving
at
his
new post in Boston.
** OUCH
duke doesn't even listen to his own church leaders who have admitted the
church's cupability in these matters.
** amazing
It would be even more amazing if I spelt culpability correctly. :)
chortle. English spelling is clearly hellish.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Scruffy McScruffovitch" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
26 Sep 2007 07:52:56 AM |
|
|
".R L Measures" <r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:r-2609070524090001@66-52-38-37.lsan.dock.net...
In article <13fjfukaqro1f6d@corp.supernews.com>, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote:
".R L Measures" <r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:r-2509071856190001@66-52-38-98.lsan.dock.net...
In article <13fhvt6npi1sn8c@corp.supernews.com>, "Scruffy
McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote:
".R L Measures" <r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:r-2509070445260001@66-52-38-5.lsan.dock.net...
In article <13fgmuq5pv48f51@corp.supernews.com>, "Scruffy
McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:ku8gf3l65roljblv49u3vu0h3g0stfcirr@4ax.com...
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:24:42 -0400, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET>
wrote:
. ... and almost all of the >2,000 altar-boys lied.
LOL! Yep, according to Duke, that's probably the way he
thinks.
How many of the >2000 took the stand?
How many of the >2000 did not file depositions and complaints?
I don't know, but none took the stand and all got rich.
Why did the child victims parents say "give me the money"
rather
than
push
for a
trial?
Why would the Church push to pay over $2,000,000,000.00 if there
was
no
guilt?
My guess - to avoid the heartbreak to victim and accused alike
over
an
extended
trial with 2000 victims testifying and endless lineup of other
witnesses.
*****...
"The church has failed in its duties to protect the weakest members
of
our
congregations. We can no longer turn a blind eye to these
attrocities."
Archbishop Patrick O'Malley, July 31st, 2003, shortly after
arriving
at
his
new post in Boston.
** OUCH
duke doesn't even listen to his own church leaders who have admitted
the
church's cupability in these matters.
** amazing
It would be even more amazing if I spelt culpability correctly. :)
chortle. English spelling is clearly hellish.
I have a new laptop in which the keyboard seems to be smaller than the old
laptop. I seem to "fat finger" a lot more with this one.
.
|
|
|
| User: "•R L Measures" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
26 Sep 2007 09:13:02 AM |
|
|
In article <13fklhd29hv0g33@corp.supernews.com>, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote:
".R L Measures" <r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:r-2609070524090001@66-52-38-37.lsan.dock.net...
In article <13fjfukaqro1f6d@corp.supernews.com>, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote:
".R L Measures" <r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:r-2509071856190001@66-52-38-98.lsan.dock.net...
In article <13fhvt6npi1sn8c@corp.supernews.com>, "Scruffy
McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote:
...
** OUCH
duke doesn't even listen to his own church leaders who have admitted
the
church's cupability in these matters.
** amazing
It would be even more amazing if I spelt culpability correctly. :)
chortle. English spelling is clearly hellish.
I have a new laptop in which the keyboard seems to be smaller than the old
laptop. I seem to "fat finger" a lot more with this one.
** the most hellish part about English is that a spell checker will not do
a complete spell check.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Scruffy McScruffovitch" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
26 Sep 2007 10:22:08 AM |
|
|
".R L Measures" <r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:r-2609070713020001@66-52-38-37.lsan.dock.net...
In article <13fklhd29hv0g33@corp.supernews.com>, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote:
".R L Measures" <r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:r-2609070524090001@66-52-38-37.lsan.dock.net...
In article <13fjfukaqro1f6d@corp.supernews.com>, "Scruffy
McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote:
".R L Measures" <r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:r-2509071856190001@66-52-38-98.lsan.dock.net...
In article <13fhvt6npi1sn8c@corp.supernews.com>, "Scruffy
McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote:
...
** OUCH
duke doesn't even listen to his own church leaders who have
admitted
the
church's cupability in these matters.
** amazing
It would be even more amazing if I spelt culpability correctly. :)
chortle. English spelling is clearly hellish.
I have a new laptop in which the keyboard seems to be smaller than the
old
laptop. I seem to "fat finger" a lot more with this one.
** the most hellish part about English is that a spell checker will not do
a complete spell check.
I rarely use a spell checker anyway.
.
|
|
|
| User: "•R L Measures" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
26 Sep 2007 07:38:11 PM |
|
|
In article <13fku918ie963bf@corp.supernews.com>, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote:
".R L Measures" <r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:r-2609070713020001@66-52-38-37.lsan.dock.net...
In article <13fklhd29hv0g33@corp.supernews.com>, "Scruffy McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote:
".R L Measures" <r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:r-2609070524090001@66-52-38-37.lsan.dock.net...
In article <13fjfukaqro1f6d@corp.supernews.com>, "Scruffy
McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote:
".R L Measures" <r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:r-2509071856190001@66-52-38-98.lsan.dock.net...
In article <13fhvt6npi1sn8c@corp.supernews.com>, "Scruffy
McScruffovitch"
<Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote:
...
** OUCH
duke doesn't even listen to his own church leaders who have
admitted
the
church's cupability in these matters.
** amazing
It would be even more amazing if I spelt culpability correctly. :)
chortle. English spelling is clearly hellish.
I have a new laptop in which the keyboard seems to be smaller than the
old
laptop. I seem to "fat finger" a lot more with this one.
** the most hellish part about English is that a spell checker will not do
a complete spell check.
I rarely use a spell checker anyway.
** same here
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: NAMBLA and Roman Catholicism. Let's use some common sense. |
25 Sep 2007 05:20:40 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:52:31 -0400, "Scruffy McScruffovitch" <Scruffy_1@FAM.NET>
wrote:
How many of the >2000 took the stand?
How many of the >2000 did not file depositions and complaints?
I don't know, but none took the stand and all got rich.
Why did the child victims parents say "give me the money" rather than
push for a trial?
Why would the Church push to pay over $2,000,000,000.00 if there was no
guilt?
My guess - to avoid the heartbreak to victim and accused alike over an
extended trial with 2000 victims testifying and endless lineup of other witnesses.
*****...
2000 accusers to testify, and endless other witnesses would have taken decades.
"The church has failed in its duties to protect the weakest members of our
congregations. We can no longer turn a blind eye to these attrocities."
That's exactly what I said.
Archbishop Patrick O'Malley, July 31st, 2003, shortly after arriving at his
new post in Boston.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
