Religions > Atheism > NARAL Wish List Calls for More Abortions if Congress Changes Hands
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
09 Oct 2006 09:17:32 PM |
| Object: |
NARAL Wish List Calls for More Abortions if Congress Changes Hands |
This is absolutely disgusting and only re-enforces what pro-life advocates
have claimed all along; pro-choice = pro-abortion.
http://www.lifenews.com/nat2637.html
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- One of the nation's top abortion advocacy
groups has developed a wish list of legislative and policy results it hopes
to achieve if abortion advocates wind up with control of Congress following
the November elections.
While pro-life candidates are running for Congress in both political
parties, NARAL is hoping Democrats gain control of both the House and
Senate, because the current members of Democratic leadership back legalized
abortion.
Should that happen, the group says it will have a field day promoting
abortion.
In a fundraising email NARAL sent to its members that LifeNews.com obtained,
the group asked them to "imagine a Congress in pro-choice hands."
"With a House or Senate under pro-choice leadership, we will turn pro-choice
values into pro-choice policies," the group warned.
With abortion advocates running the show, NARAL says it would "control the
powerful Judiciary committee and stop George Bush from placing new
anti-choice judges on the Supreme Court and other federal courts."
Moreover, NARAL celebrates that pro-abortion lawmakers "would control key
committees" and "instantly become a majority on every panel."
"Rather than sitting through anti-choice hearing after hearing, called by
anti-choice committee chairs, new committee chairs could spend their time
promoting" abortion, NARAL wrote.
Pro-life lawmakers would "no longer have a forum to spread propaganda on the
"myths and effects" of Roe v. Wade, nonexistent syndromes like
"post-abortion trauma," or allegations that RU 486 is dangerous for women."
"Pro-choice forces would control the Senate and House floor schedules," the
group added.
As a result, pro-life legislation would likely not receive committee
hearings or be voted down if it is ever brought up.
The prospect presents significant concerns for pro-life advocates who
worried about not only stacked panels promoting abortion, but abortion
advocates launching one-sided investigations to revoke funding for or shut
down crisis pregnancy centers or abstinence programs.
NARAL promised to force taxpayers to pay for family planning policies that
include the morning after pill, which may cause an abortion in certain
instances and has been proven to not reduce abortions or teen pregnancies.
The group also wants to pass legislation forcing pharmacists to dispense any
drug such as the morning after pill. That requirement could later wind up
covering drugs used in assisted suicides or the dangerous RU 486 abortion
pill.
NARAL also said it would urge pro-abortion lawmakers to hold hearings on the
Bush administration's pro-life views designed to discredit such policies and
making sure taxpayer funds aren't used to promote or pay for abortions in
other nations.
In its agenda, if its allies gain control of Congress, NARAL promises to
restore funding for the UNFPA, has been involved in China's one-child,
forced abortion family planning policies. It will also force hospitals,
including pro-life religious or private ones, to give the morning after pill
to victims of rape or incest.
--
----------
J Yöung
youngopinions@aol.com
.
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: NARAL Wish List Calls for More Abortions if Congress Changes Hands |
10 Oct 2006 12:16:59 AM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
This is absolutely disgusting and only re-enforces what pro-life advocates
have claimed all along; pro-choice = pro-abortion.
http://www.lifenews.com/nat2637.html
How much is LifeNews paying you to rip off their ranting, "Jon"? Dale and I
have been pro-choice for longer than you'll ever understand, and that didn't
keep us from being parents and grandparents. Maybe you should find something
better to do until such time that *you* can carry a pregnancy to term,
yourself. At that point, you might deserve an input into the discussion.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Iowa 6, Houston 3 (October 7)
NEXT GAME: Thursday, October 12 at Iowa, 7:05
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Parsifal" |
|
| Title: Re: NARAL Wish List Calls for More Abortions if Congress Changes Hands |
10 Oct 2006 03:50:10 AM |
|
|
J Young a =E9crit :
This is absolutely disgusting and only re-enforces what pro-life advocates
have claimed all along; pro-choice =3D pro-abortion.
What part of "pro-choice" don't you understand? The part about
"freedom" or the part about "in favor of"?
Is this your sole purpose in life? Sending postings daily which prove
that you're at best a troll or at worse, a nazi turd?
http://www.lifenews.com/nat2637.html
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- One of the nation's top abortion advocacy
groups has developed a wish list of legislative and policy results it hop=
es
to achieve if abortion advocates wind up with control of Congress followi=
ng
the November elections.
While pro-life candidates are running for Congress in both political
parties, NARAL is hoping Democrats gain control of both the House and
Senate, because the current members of Democratic leadership back legaliz=
ed
abortion.
Should that happen, the group says it will have a field day promoting
abortion.
In a fundraising email NARAL sent to its members that LifeNews.com obtain=
ed,
the group asked them to "imagine a Congress in pro-choice hands."
"With a House or Senate under pro-choice leadership, we will turn pro-cho=
ice
values into pro-choice policies," the group warned.
With abortion advocates running the show, NARAL says it would "control the
powerful Judiciary committee and stop George Bush from placing new
anti-choice judges on the Supreme Court and other federal courts."
Moreover, NARAL celebrates that pro-abortion lawmakers "would control key
committees" and "instantly become a majority on every panel."
"Rather than sitting through anti-choice hearing after hearing, called by
anti-choice committee chairs, new committee chairs could spend their time
promoting" abortion, NARAL wrote.
Pro-life lawmakers would "no longer have a forum to spread propaganda on =
the
"myths and effects" of Roe v. Wade, nonexistent syndromes like
"post-abortion trauma," or allegations that RU 486 is dangerous for women=
.."
"Pro-choice forces would control the Senate and House floor schedules," t=
he
group added.
As a result, pro-life legislation would likely not receive committee
hearings or be voted down if it is ever brought up.
The prospect presents significant concerns for pro-life advocates who
worried about not only stacked panels promoting abortion, but abortion
advocates launching one-sided investigations to revoke funding for or shut
down crisis pregnancy centers or abstinence programs.
NARAL promised to force taxpayers to pay for family planning policies that
include the morning after pill, which may cause an abortion in certain
instances and has been proven to not reduce abortions or teen pregnancies.
The group also wants to pass legislation forcing pharmacists to dispense =
any
drug such as the morning after pill. That requirement could later wind up
covering drugs used in assisted suicides or the dangerous RU 486 abortion
pill.
NARAL also said it would urge pro-abortion lawmakers to hold hearings on =
the
Bush administration's pro-life views designed to discredit such policies =
and
making sure taxpayer funds aren't used to promote or pay for abortions in
other nations.
In its agenda, if its allies gain control of Congress, NARAL promises to
restore funding for the UNFPA, has been involved in China's one-child,
forced abortion family planning policies. It will also force hospitals,
including pro-life religious or private ones, to give the morning after p=
ill
to victims of rape or incest.
=20
=20
=20
=20
=20
--=20
----------
=20
J Y=F6ung
youngopinions@aol.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: NARAL Wish List Calls for More Abortions if Congress Changes Hands |
10 Oct 2006 10:41:50 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 9 Oct 2006 22:17:32 -0400, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
wrote:
This is absolutely disgusting and only re-enforces what pro-life advocates
have claimed all along; pro-choice = pro-abortion.
Pro-abortion is forcing a woman to have an abortion. Pro-choice is
allowing her to have one.
Have you committed suicide yet? You're allowed to. Are they the same
thing?
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"We should do unto others as we would want them to do unto us. If I were an unborn
fetus I would want others to use force to protect me, therefore using force against
abortionists is *justifiable homocide*."
- "Pro-Life" doctor killer and corpse Paul Hill
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: NARAL Wish List Calls for More Abortions if Congress Changes Hands |
09 Oct 2006 10:24:15 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 9 Oct 2006 22:17:32 -0400, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
wrote:
This is absolutely disgusting and only re-enforces what pro-life advocates
have claimed all along; pro-choice = pro-abortion.
You know what's *really* disgusting, Young? *You* are, you lying sack
of diarrhetic pig *****.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Day Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: NARAL Wish List Calls for More Abortions if Congress ChangesHands |
10 Oct 2006 12:05:13 AM |
|
|
John Baker wrote:
On Mon, 9 Oct 2006 22:17:32 -0400, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
wrote:
This is absolutely disgusting and only re-enforces what pro-life advocates
have claimed all along; pro-choice = pro-abortion.
You know what's *really* disgusting, Young? *You* are, you lying sack
of diarrhetic pig *****.
Dont sweat it. Be glad he's wasting his time. the abortion debate is
over. Turns out that many plants and fungi developed a defense against
herbivores from evolving a taste for them by causing infertility (birth
control) and abortions.
The difficulties young women have had has made herbalists do research to
rediscover what ancient witches used. I've grown some of them; they are
not like marijuana, but obscure small plants that easily grow in gardens
and are abundant in temperate zone woods.
No appointment, no clinic, no protester line, no adoption sermon, no
doctor bill, no prescription, no problems with pharmacists, and no
parental consent. Just nearly free abortion on demand. 1st, 2nd, or even
3rd trimester "still births".
Draconian law has backfired.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: NARAL Wish List Calls for More Abortions if Congress Changes Hands |
10 Oct 2006 09:50:44 AM |
|
|
Since when did US Congress become a playgorund for such minority interests?
Control of the minoirty faction is just as legitimate as control of the
majority faction, something that these selfish, undenmocratic minority
interest groups will not admit or adhere to.
They only want their ideas represented in law even if it goes against the
majority, which is a forbidden stance in US politics.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Strife767" |
|
| Title: Re: NARAL Wish List Calls for More Abortions if Congress Changes Hands |
14 Oct 2006 06:24:48 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:50:44 -0400, John D. Wentzky
<johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
Since when did US Congress become a playgorund for such minority
interests?
You know that the pro-life crowd is the minority here, right?
--
____________ _____________ __________________
__ ___/_ /__________(_)__ __/____/__ /_ ___/__ /
_____ \_ __/_ ___/_ /__ /_ _ _ \_ /_ __ \__ /
____/ // /_ _ / _ / _ __/ / __/ / / /_/ /_ /
/____/ \__/ /_/ /_/ /_/ \___//_/ \____/ /_/
Skeptic, atheist...and somehow an optimist. Go figure.
I want to change the world.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: NARAL Wish List Calls for More Abortions if Congress Changes Hands |
14 Oct 2006 10:03:37 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 23:24:48 GMT, Strife767 <strife767@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:50:44 -0400, John D. Wentzky
<johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
Since when did US Congress become a playgorund for such minority
interests?
You know that the pro-life crowd is the minority here, right?
Depends on definitions.
Pro-choice is pro-life. The anti-abortion crowd is definitely in the
minority.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"I want you to just let a wave of intolerance wash over you. I want
you to let a wave of hatred wash over you. Yes, hate is good...Our
goal is a Christian nation. We have a Biblical duty, we are called by
God, to conquer this country. We don't want equal time. We don't want
pluralism."
-Randall Terry, Founder of Operation Rescue, The News-Sentinel, Fort
Wayne, Indiana, 8-16-93
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "LC" |
|
| Title: Re: NARAL Wish List Calls for More Abortions if Congress Changes Hands |
10 Oct 2006 09:36:11 AM |
|
|
Suffering through another daily bout of OCD, "J Young"
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:q8KdnZOeeNiznrbYnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@giganews.com...
This is absolutely disgusting and only re-enforces what pro-life advocates
have claimed all along; pro-choice = pro-abortion.
Take your meds, IBen.
You're babbling again.
LC~ "J Young" = "IBen" = nutcase.
"why is it that most people who are against abortion are people who you
wouldn't want to ***** in the first place?"
From: (Jon Young), 50 year old virgin.
Newsgroups: alt.abortion
Subject: george carlin said it best
Date: 17 Oct 2003 19:47:28 -0700
Message-ID: <567f3dc3.0310171847.7e13d84@posting.google.com>
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
