| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Richard Catto" |
| Date: |
14 Dec 2006 03:49:21 AM |
| Object: |
NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
Rumplestiltskin wrote:
When I moved here from Canukistan I marvelled.
You're Canadian. ha ha.
You're incorrectly assuming that ALL people who have lived in
Canukistan are Canukistani's. Keep probing....maybe someday you'll
figger it out.
You're South African.
That would explain so many things.
I can't remember how
many times I said to myself....<Astonished>These people put somebody
on the moon???????????</Astonished>
nobody has landed on the Moon.
I know....and the holocaust never happened either.
it didn't, but that is besides the point and a whole nother issue.
people have tried to convince me that the technology of the late 60s
was actually up to the task of getting people onto the Moon and back.
not a hope in hell.
today, NASA has a plan to get people onto the Moon in 2020. 14 years
time. and only on a cursory visit. 2024 is targeted as the date to
establish a permanent Moon base. NASA is also appealing for help from
other nations to achieve this feat.
In 1962 JFK made a famous speech which contained this quote:
"We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this
decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because
they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the
best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we
are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which
we intend to win, and the others, too."
http://www1.jsc.nasa.gov/er/seh/ricetalk.htm
and apparently this objective was achieved in 1969, a mere 7 year gap.
So ask yourself, how was it possible that NASA was able to land men on
the Moon within 7 years back in the 60s, without any outside help using
very primitive (computer and other) technology, but today, with so much
more experience of space, vastly superior technology and even with
outside help, feels they need 14 years to achieve it?
I've said it before, and I'll say it again - if the United States did
indeed land men on the Moon in 1969, then you have exactly 12 months to
get yourselves back on that orbiting rock, or please admit that it
never happened ever - that it was, in fact, the greatest hoax ever
perpetrated on mankind.
You have 12 months, not 14 years.
Btw, you don't need to design new spacecraft from scratch. Just
reproduce the Apollo mission spacecraft and build another Saturn V
rocket. If you can build them anew with some improvements, by all means
do it, but if not, just rebuild them exactly as they were built in
1969.
You, I assume, won't have any problems with that, because, of course,
those were the vehicles that carried your people to the Moon and back
in the period 1969 - 1972, so we shouldn't anticipate any problems, now
should we?
But, look, we all know that that is not going to happen even if Hell
were to freeze over.
So, the Moon landings never took place. They are a myth.
One day when people do finally make it onto the Moon, they will look
for the wreckage of those Apollo Moon missions and not find them. NASA
will no doubt have an explanation for that. Probably buried under space
dust or perhaps you didn't look in the right place?
The Moon, btw, in preparation for the future 2020 landings has to be
remapped in detail to secure safe and suitable landing sites. That
mapping was not done in sufficient detail for the Apollo missions.
The mapping satellites in orbit around the Moon have not picked up a
shred of the Apollo mission vehicles apparently left behind on the
Moon.
today, NASA, struggles to put astronauts into space. Russia does so
routinely.
It's not a question of money - NASA has more available funds than the
Russian Federation Space program, which is so hard up for cash, it has
to sell tickets into space for $20 million a pop to rich assholes.
The bottom line is that Russian space technology is superior to
American space technology. The ISS (International Space Station) is
modelled on Russian technology (The Mir space station which Russia
de-orbitted in 2001 due to lack of funds). America's space station,
Skylab, crashed into Australia in the late 70s.
The Russian Soyuz capsule is vastly, and I mean vastly vastly vastly,
superior to the Space Shuttle. It works. And it works at a fraction of
the cost. And it's re-useable too, but they only reuse it 5 times
before discarding.
The Chinese Space Program uses the Soyuz as the model for their
Shenzhou capsule:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/534960.stm
Lastly, one must consider why the Soviet Union did not continue its
program to land cosmonauts on the Moon after the Americans had done so.
Where is the shame in coming second?
The Russians realised that they could not do it, at all. And they had
been ahead of you in the space race, all along. They had a spacecraft
go round the Moon before America did.
Lastly we must consider the integrity, or rather, the lack thereof of
Americans. Americans are deceptive, tricky, conniving little liars who
will do anything it takes to win (or appear to win).
Americans cannot be trusted. They lie routinely.
.
|
|
| User: "Father Haskell" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
15 Dec 2006 02:54:27 PM |
|
|
Greg Evans wrote:
Father Haskell wrote:
NASA should send up dwarves instead of 5'10" regular folks, anyway.
You can cut the human payload weight and use the weight savings for
more cargo. Life support requirements, such as food, oxygen, and
waste removal are lessened. Spacecraft themselves could be reduced
in size. If nothing else, you could send up bigger crews with the
same craft.
But then all those Little People would no longer be available for a
"Wizard of Oz" remake!
You'll get a remake of Santa Claus Conquers the Martians.
Seems like a good tradeoff.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Greg Evans" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
15 Dec 2006 03:04:07 PM |
|
|
Father Haskell wrote:
Greg Evans wrote:
Father Haskell wrote:
NASA should send up dwarves instead of 5'10" regular folks,
anyway.
[snip]
But then all those Little People would no longer be available for a
"Wizard of Oz" remake!
You'll get a remake of Santa Claus Conquers the Martians.
Seems like a good tradeoff.
I find those terms acceptable. Proceed.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
23 Dec 2006 08:18:46 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:04:07 -0500, "Greg Evans" <misterx@larkbooks.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
Father Haskell wrote:
Greg Evans wrote:
Father Haskell wrote:
NASA should send up dwarves instead of 5'10" regular folks,
anyway.
[snip]
But then all those Little People would no longer be available for a
"Wizard of Oz" remake!
You'll get a remake of Santa Claus Conquers the Martians.
Seems like a good tradeoff.
I find those terms acceptable. Proceed.
Don't forget "Land of the Giants."
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Greg Evans" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
23 Dec 2006 09:45:01 PM |
|
|
stoney wrote:
Don't forget "Land of the Giants."
Oh, how I wish I could!
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
24 Dec 2006 10:33:42 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 22:45:01 -0500, "Greg Evans"
<gregevansREMOVE@charterBLATHER.net> wrote in alt.atheism
stoney wrote:
Don't forget "Land of the Giants."
Oh, how I wish I could!
[/cue evil chuckle]
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "ur_droll" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
14 Dec 2006 04:02:37 AM |
|
|
Richard Catto wrote:
Rumplestiltskin wrote:
When I moved here from Canukistan I marvelled.
You're Canadian. ha ha.
You're incorrectly assuming that ALL people who have lived in
Canukistan are Canukistani's. Keep probing....maybe someday you'll
figger it out.
You're South African.
That would explain so many things.
Ya know that south africans don't have a complete monopoly on
stupidity. Don't forget the zims
.
|
|
|
| User: "the14thdisciple" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
14 Dec 2006 04:22:57 AM |
|
|
ur_droll wrote:
Richard Catto wrote:
Rumplestiltskin wrote:
When I moved here from Canukistan I marvelled.
You're Canadian. ha ha.
You're incorrectly assuming that ALL people who have lived in
Canukistan are Canukistani's. Keep probing....maybe someday you'll
figger it out.
You're South African.
That would explain so many things.
Ya know that south africans don't have a complete monopoly on
stupidity. Don't forget the zims
i've Never met a nice South African, and neither Have South Africans.
14
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Catto" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
15 Dec 2006 07:30:52 AM |
|
|
the14thdisciple wrote:
i've Never met a nice South African, and neither Have South Africans.
that's sooo totally not true.
i'm a nice South African. possibly the nicest actually.
:-D
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rumplestiltskin" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
15 Dec 2006 11:23:53 AM |
|
|
[Default] On 15 Dec 2006 05:30:52 -0800, in the throes of an
autoerotic fantasy, "Richard Catto" <rrcatto@gmail.com>muttered:
the14thdisciple wrote:
i've Never met a nice South African, and neither Have South Africans.
that's sooo totally not true.
i'm a nice South African. possibly the nicest actually.
:-D
Then your entire contry is comprised of 'more' complete idiots.
--
Rumplestiltskin is my name, and humpin' wimmen is my game.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Catto" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
20 Dec 2006 08:09:14 AM |
|
|
Rumplestiltskin wrote:
i've Never met a nice South African, and neither Have South Africans.
that's sooo totally not true.
i'm a nice South African. possibly the nicest actually.
Then your entire contry is comprised of 'more' complete idiots.
America is the problem, not South Africa.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas D. Anderson" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
22 Dec 2006 10:10:04 AM |
|
|
Richard Catto wrote:
Rumplestiltskin wrote:
i've Never met a nice South African, and neither Have South Africans.
that's sooo totally not true.
i'm a nice South African. possibly the nicest actually.
Then your entire contry is comprised of 'more' complete idiots.
America is the problem, not South Africa.
South Africa is an amazing analogy to New York City, with the native,
Dutch and British demeographic strata, the gangs, unemployment, need
for help but arrogant attitude. Perhaps South Africa should build a
540m tall building and invite Muslims to fly planes into it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Catto" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
23 Dec 2006 10:03:21 AM |
|
|
Douglas D. Anderson wrote:
i've Never met a nice South African, and neither Have South Africans.
that's sooo totally not true.
i'm a nice South African. possibly the nicest actually.
Then your entire contry is comprised of 'more' complete idiots.
America is the problem, not South Africa.
South Africa is an amazing analogy to New York City, with the native,
Dutch and British demeographic strata, the gangs, unemployment, need
for help but arrogant attitude. Perhaps South Africa should build a
540m tall building and invite Muslims to fly planes into it.
we don't hate Muslims in SA.
nor do we thwart their desires to have Palestine, which belongs to
them.
give it up already, dammit!
Israel has been a fucking unmitigated disaster.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rumplestiltskin" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
15 Dec 2006 05:47:36 AM |
|
|
[Default] On 14 Dec 2006 01:49:21 -0800, in the throes of an
autoerotic fantasy, "Richard Catto" <rrcatto@gmail.com>muttered:
<Catto theory snipped>
I didn't know Fox aired in za.
You can search the internet for facts and fiction 'til your hearts
content, but you'll find nothing conclusive. It's really no different
than proving the existence of God. Except....time WILL tell.
There's no point in debating this with you. We could go round and
round for days. Bottom line is I have nothing to offer that proves it
happened. You have nothing to offer that proves it didn't.
--
Rumplestiltskin is my name, and humpin' wimmen is my game.
.
|
|
|
| User: "MosNot StillNot@YourHouse" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
15 Dec 2006 09:19:50 AM |
|
|
"Rumplestiltskin" <noway@forgetit.com> wrote in message
news:ag25o2l6k6s2gbp6paq7d0i2ba2hhj746e@4ax.com...
[Default] On 14 Dec 2006 01:49:21 -0800, in the throes of an
autoerotic fantasy, "Richard Catto" <rrcatto@gmail.com>muttered:
<Catto theory snipped>
THANK YOU !!!
The rest of UseNet owes you a debt of gratitude.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Catto" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
15 Dec 2006 11:13:06 AM |
|
|
MosNot wrote:
<Catto theory snipped>
THANK YOU !!!
The rest of UseNet owes you a debt of gratitude.
there's more than one person willing to go into debt to have you
snuffed.
what do you think about that, snot-nosed kid?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
15 Dec 2006 08:22:50 PM |
|
|
On 15 Dec 2006 09:13:06 -0800 "Richard Catto" <rrcatto@gmail.com>
said the following in alt.atheism and I was immediately reminded of
1,000 Chinchillas singing Handel's "Messiah" for some reason...
MosNot wrote:
<Catto theory snipped>
THANK YOU !!!
The rest of UseNet owes you a debt of gratitude.
there's more than one person willing to go into debt to have you
snuffed.
what do you think about that, snot-nosed kid?
I used to be a sniper. Still shoot on a regular basis and can put
rounds through center mass at over 700 meters.
I'd do you for free. Really.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
"Where is the prince who can afford so to cover
his country with troops for its defense, as that
ten thousand men descending from the clouds, might
not,in many places, do an infinite deal of mischief
before a force could be brought together to repel
them?" - BENJAMIN FRANKLIN-1784
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Catto" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
16 Dec 2006 09:15:08 PM |
|
|
Douglas Berry wrote:
On 15 Dec 2006 09:13:06 -0800 "Richard Catto" <rrcatto@gmail.com>
said the following in alt.atheism and I was immediately reminded of
1,000 Chinchillas singing Handel's "Messiah" for some reason...
MosNot wrote:
<Catto theory snipped>
THANK YOU !!!
The rest of UseNet owes you a debt of gratitude.
there's more than one person willing to go into debt to have you
snuffed.
what do you think about that, snot-nosed kid?
I used to be a sniper. Still shoot on a regular basis and can put
rounds through center mass at over 700 meters.
I'd do you for free. Really.
not for free. it's gonna cost you.
and you can't do it.
even if you set about it in earnest right now, you don't have time.
you are about to be nuked.
you're a dead man walking.
goodbye.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
17 Dec 2006 12:06:06 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 05:15:08 +0200 Richard Catto <rrcatto@gmail.com>
said the following in alt.atheism and I was immediately reminded of
1,000 Chinchillas singing Handel's "Messiah" for some reason...
Douglas Berry wrote:
On 15 Dec 2006 09:13:06 -0800 "Richard Catto" <rrcatto@gmail.com>
said the following in alt.atheism and I was immediately reminded of
1,000 Chinchillas singing Handel's "Messiah" for some reason...
MosNot wrote:
<Catto theory snipped>
THANK YOU !!!
The rest of UseNet owes you a debt of gratitude.
there's more than one person willing to go into debt to have you
snuffed.
what do you think about that, snot-nosed kid?
I used to be a sniper. Still shoot on a regular basis and can put
rounds through center mass at over 700 meters.
I'd do you for free. Really.
not for free. it's gonna cost you.
and you can't do it.
even if you set about it in earnest right now, you don't have time.
you are about to be nuked.
you're a dead man walking.
goodbye.
Yawn.
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Jason Gastrich is praying for me on 8 January 2011
"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the
source of all true art and all science. He to whom this emotion is a
stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as
good as dead: his eyes are closed." - Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rumplestiltskin" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
16 Dec 2006 12:19:49 AM |
|
|
[Default] On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:22:50 -0800, in the throes of an
autoerotic fantasy, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com>muttered:
On 15 Dec 2006 09:13:06 -0800 "Richard Catto" <rrcatto@gmail.com>
said the following in alt.atheism and I was immediately reminded of
1,000 Chinchillas singing Handel's "Messiah" for some reason...
MosNot wrote:
<Catto theory snipped>
THANK YOU !!!
The rest of UseNet owes you a debt of gratitude.
there's more than one person willing to go into debt to have you
snuffed.
what do you think about that, snot-nosed kid?
I used to be a sniper. Still shoot on a regular basis and can put
rounds through center mass at over 700 meters.
I'd do you for free. Really.
Would you....please.
--
Rumplestiltskin is my name, and humpin' wimmen is my game.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
16 Dec 2006 01:27:18 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:19:49 -0500 Rumplestiltskin
<noway@forgetit.com> said the following in alt.atheism and I was
immediately reminded of 1,000 Chinchillas singing Handel's "Messiah"
for some reason...
[Default] On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:22:50 -0800, in the throes of an
autoerotic fantasy, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com>muttered:
On 15 Dec 2006 09:13:06 -0800 "Richard Catto" <rrcatto@gmail.com>
said the following in alt.atheism and I was immediately reminded of
1,000 Chinchillas singing Handel's "Messiah" for some reason...
MosNot wrote:
<Catto theory snipped>
THANK YOU !!!
The rest of UseNet owes you a debt of gratitude.
there's more than one person willing to go into debt to have you
snuffed.
what do you think about that, snot-nosed kid?
I used to be a sniper. Still shoot on a regular basis and can put
rounds through center mass at over 700 meters.
I'd do you for free. Really.
Would you....please.
The paperwork is murder. And there might actually be a jury that
would look at this loon and still convict me.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
"Where is the prince who can afford so to cover
his country with troops for its defense, as that
ten thousand men descending from the clouds, might
not,in many places, do an infinite deal of mischief
before a force could be brought together to repel
them?" - BENJAMIN FRANKLIN-1784
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Catto" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
16 Dec 2006 09:17:15 PM |
|
|
Douglas Berry wrote:
I used to be a sniper. Still shoot on a regular basis and can put
rounds through center mass at over 700 meters.
I'd do you for free. Really.
Would you....please.
The paperwork is murder. And there might actually be a jury that
would look at this loon and still convict me.
shut up. you're a fucking idiot.
you have absolutely no fucking brains whatsoever.
damn, you must be the stupidest person i've met recently.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
17 Dec 2006 12:07:55 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 05:17:15 +0200 Richard Catto <rrcatto@gmail.com>
said the following in alt.atheism and I was immediately reminded of
1,000 Chinchillas singing Handel's "Messiah" for some reason...
Douglas Berry wrote:
I used to be a sniper. Still shoot on a regular basis and can put
rounds through center mass at over 700 meters.
I'd do you for free. Really.
Would you....please.
The paperwork is murder. And there might actually be a jury that
would look at this loon and still convict me.
shut up. you're a fucking idiot.
you have absolutely no fucking brains whatsoever.
damn, you must be the stupidest person i've met recently.
I'm sorry Richard. Did my posting facts about the lunar landing make
you cry? Are you still all pissy because we didn't die of bird flu
last year?
It must be terrible for you, hating us so much and we just keep
getting stronger, and prospering while you.. you sit in your own
puddle of angst and pretend that you matter to someone.
Go cry, emo kid.
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Jason Gastrich is praying for me on 8 January 2011
"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the
source of all true art and all science. He to whom this emotion is a
stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as
good as dead: his eyes are closed." - Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rumplestiltskin" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
16 Dec 2006 08:18:30 AM |
|
|
[Default] On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:27:18 -0800, in the throes of an
autoerotic fantasy, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com>muttered:
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:19:49 -0500 Rumplestiltskin
<noway@forgetit.com> said the following in alt.atheism and I was
immediately reminded of 1,000 Chinchillas singing Handel's "Messiah"
for some reason...
[Default] On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:22:50 -0800, in the throes of an
autoerotic fantasy, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com>muttered:
On 15 Dec 2006 09:13:06 -0800 "Richard Catto" <rrcatto@gmail.com>
said the following in alt.atheism and I was immediately reminded of
1,000 Chinchillas singing Handel's "Messiah" for some reason...
MosNot wrote:
<Catto theory snipped>
THANK YOU !!!
The rest of UseNet owes you a debt of gratitude.
there's more than one person willing to go into debt to have you
snuffed.
what do you think about that, snot-nosed kid?
I used to be a sniper. Still shoot on a regular basis and can put
rounds through center mass at over 700 meters.
I'd do you for free. Really.
Would you....please.
The paperwork is murder. And there might actually be a jury that
would look at this loon and still convict me.
So, you're saying you're forfeiting your rise to martydom to a
possibility of incarceration. I, and the multitude of people in groups
he's raided, are disappointed.
--
Rumplestiltskin is my name, and humpin' wimmen is my game.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas D. Anderson" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
16 Dec 2006 09:11:11 AM |
|
|
Rumplestiltskin wrote:
[Default] On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:27:18 -0800, in the throes of an
autoerotic fantasy, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com>muttered:
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:19:49 -0500 Rumplestiltskin
<noway@forgetit.com> said the following in alt.atheism and I was
immediately reminded of 1,000 Chinchillas singing Handel's "Messiah"
for some reason...
[Default] On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:22:50 -0800, in the throes of an
autoerotic fantasy, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com>muttered:
On 15 Dec 2006 09:13:06 -0800 "Richard Catto" <rrcatto@gmail.com>
said the following in alt.atheism and I was immediately reminded of
1,000 Chinchillas singing Handel's "Messiah" for some reason...
MosNot wrote:
<Catto theory snipped>
THANK YOU !!!
The rest of UseNet owes you a debt of gratitude.
there's more than one person willing to go into debt to have you
snuffed.
what do you think about that, snot-nosed kid?
I used to be a sniper. Still shoot on a regular basis and can put
rounds through center mass at over 700 meters.
I'd do you for free. Really.
Would you....please.
The paperwork is murder. And there might actually be a jury that
would look at this loon and still convict me.
So, you're saying you're forfeiting your rise to martydom to a
possibility of incarceration. I, and the multitude of people in groups
he's raided, are disappointed.
Being exiled or killed by an intolerant government is certainly a
feather in one's cap for the history books. Men such as Lao Tse,
Patrick Henry, Jesse James, Felix Dzerzhinsky <eg>, have become
mythical heroes, by defying the system for what they believed to
be right, risking life and limb to make the world a better place,
shoulder to shoulder, fighting for the little people, the angry
masses, the disowned and disinherited, shouting out to Douglas
Berry with one voice, "Shoot! Shoot!"... and then Douglas Berry
replies,"When I took this job, firing single 50 caliber rounds
from up to a kilometer away with deadly precision, attaining
the highest qualifying marks in the elite special forces, being
decorated and allowed to wear these insignia... I didn't know
I'd have to k'k'k'kill anyone...can I go home now?"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
16 Dec 2006 11:12:19 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:11:11 GMT "Douglas D. Anderson"
<dda@rr.rochester.com> said the following in alt.atheism and I was
immediately reminded of 1,000 Chinchillas singing Handel's "Messiah"
for some reason...
and then Douglas Berry
replies,"When I took this job, firing single 50 caliber rounds
from up to a kilometer away with deadly precision, attaining
the highest qualifying marks in the elite special forces, being
decorated and allowed to wear these insignia... I didn't know
I'd have to k'k'k'kill anyone...can I go home now?"
Hey, I didn't mind the killing part when I wore the uniform. But I
seem to recall them telling me that continuing to kill people and
break things in civilian life was *bad.*
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Jason Gastrich is praying for me on 8 January 2011
"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the
source of all true art and all science. He to whom this emotion is a
stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as
good as dead: his eyes are closed." - Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
23 Dec 2006 08:17:19 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 09:12:19 -0800, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in alt.atheism
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:11:11 GMT "Douglas D. Anderson"
<dda@rr.rochester.com> said the following in alt.atheism and I was
immediately reminded of 1,000 Chinchillas singing Handel's "Messiah"
for some reason...
and then Douglas Berry
replies,"When I took this job, firing single 50 caliber rounds
from up to a kilometer away with deadly precision, attaining
the highest qualifying marks in the elite special forces, being
decorated and allowed to wear these insignia... I didn't know
I'd have to k'k'k'kill anyone...can I go home now?"
Hey, I didn't mind the killing part when I wore the uniform. But I
seem to recall them telling me that continuing to kill people and
break things in civilian life was *bad.*
Yabbutt, *bad* is good. Didn't you get the memo?.....
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Catto" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
15 Dec 2006 11:13:47 AM |
|
|
MosNot wrote:
<Catto theory snipped>
THANK YOU !!!
The rest of UseNet owes you a debt of gratitude.
there's more than one person willing to go into debt to have you
snuffed.
what do you think about that, snot-nosed kid?
.
|
|
|
| User: "ur_droll" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
15 Dec 2006 01:50:34 PM |
|
|
Richard Catto wrote:
MosNot wrote:
<Catto theory snipped>
THANK YOU !!!
The rest of UseNet owes you a debt of gratitude.
there's more than one person willing to go into debt to have you
snuffed.
what do you think about that, snot-nosed kid?
LoL.... he made you so pissed that you stuttered
.
|
|
|
| User: "MosNot StillNot@YourHouse" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
15 Dec 2006 07:04:25 PM |
|
|
"ur_droll" <Chex@xtra.co.nz> wrote in message
news:1166212234.346493.171910@79g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
Richard Catto wrote:
MosNot wrote:
<Catto theory snipped>
THANK YOU !!!
The rest of UseNet owes you a debt of gratitude.
there's more than one person willing to go into debt to have you
snuffed.
what do you think about that, snot-nosed kid?
LoL.... he made you so pissed that you stuttered
I warms my heart I ***** Mel off.
Seems he's still crying because Mos constantly kicked his *****.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Catto" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA (back) on the Moon? Yeah right! |
15 Dec 2006 09:03:18 AM |
|
|
Rumplestiltskin wrote:
I didn't know Fox aired in za.
it does not.
You can search the internet for facts and fiction 'til your hearts
content, but you'll find nothing conclusive. It's really no different
than proving the existence of God. Except....time WILL tell.
there is no objective evidence proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that
man set foot on the Moon in 1969.
if there were, there would be no debate about it whatsoever.
this is not some crackpot flat Earth theory.
the Earth is spherical - that is provable beyond a shadow of a doubt.
however, for the Moon, there is no such conclusive proof.
there is more evidence that Ancient Rome existed than there is for a
Moon landing.
The United States had / has many incentives to lie about their alleged
achievement.
There's no point in debating this with you. We could go round and
round for days. Bottom line is I have nothing to offer that proves it
happened. You have nothing to offer that proves it didn't.
If it happened, there should be an abundance of proof.
The most telling, though, is that NASA has been unable to achieve that
feat again since 1972, and cannot do it now at a moment's notice.
NASA needs 14 years plus outside co-operation to land on the Moon in
2020.
14 years is a very long time, you know. In 14 years time, computers may
be over 500 times faster than they are today. Most people living in
cities may routinely permanently access the Internet at speeds in
excess of 1Gbps. Non-fossil-fueled cars may be in use all over the
world.
How could NASA possibly need 14 years to do something they have
apparently already achieved almost 40 years ago (37 years ago today)?
That just shows the lie.
They never did it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
