| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Fred Stone" |
| Date: |
27 Jun 2005 02:13:30 PM |
| Object: |
Naw, no connection at all, nope nope nope. |
http://regimechangeiran.blogspot.com/2005/06/document-shows-irans-business-
ties-to.html
http://makeashorterlink.com/?W33F2655B
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"Metaphysics is almost always an attempt to prove
the incredible by an appeal to the unintelligible."
[H.L. Mencken, "Prejudices"]
.
|
|
| User: "GoDrex" |
|
| Title: Re: Naw, no connection at all, nope nope nope. |
27 Jun 2005 10:50:38 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1119881610.d7ad439ed0e794eda3e9eed555f96039@teranews...
http://regimechangeiran.blogspot.com/2005/06/document-shows-irans-business-
ties-to.html
http://makeashorterlink.com/?W33F2655B
are you confusing Iran with Iraq?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Naw, no connection at all, nope nope nope. |
28 Jun 2005 01:14:30 AM |
|
|
"GoDrex" <godrex35@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:vqWdnSfQ-MTSH13fUSdV9g@ptd.net:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1119881610.d7ad439ed0e794eda3e9eed555f96039@teranews...
http://regimechangeiran.blogspot.com/2005/06/document-shows-irans-
busin
ess-
ties-to.html
http://makeashorterlink.com/?W33F2655B
are you confusing Iran with Iraq?
No.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"Metaphysics is almost always an attempt to prove
the incredible by an appeal to the unintelligible."
[H.L. Mencken, "Prejudices"]
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: Naw, no connection at all, nope nope nope. |
28 Jun 2005 01:32:54 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1119881610.d7ad439ed0e794eda3e9eed555f96039@teranews...
http://regimechangeiran.blogspot.com/2005/06/document-shows-irans-business-
ties-to.html
http://makeashorterlink.com/?W33F2655B
"Ken Timmerman said, 'Iran had business ties with Osama Bin Laden going back
to the early 1990's.' "
We heard the same kind of ***** about Saddam. It was all lies then, and it
still is.
--
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
.....and ordained minister
Stork pin recipient: May 1, 2003 -Madelyn
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Naw, no connection at all, nope nope nope. |
28 Jun 2005 02:16:00 PM |
|
|
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yahooX.com> wrote in
news:akcwe.92787$PR6.2352@tornado.texas.rr.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1119881610.d7ad439ed0e794eda3e9eed555f96039@teranews...
http://regimechangeiran.blogspot.com/2005/06/document-shows-irans-
busin
ess-ties-to.html
http://makeashorterlink.com/?W33F2655B
"Ken Timmerman said, 'Iran had business ties with Osama Bin Laden
going back to the early 1990's.' "
We heard the same kind of ***** about Saddam. It was all lies then, and
it still is.
Dere won' be no famine in Egypt dis year 'cause De Nile is risin.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"Metaphysics is almost always an attempt to prove
the incredible by an appeal to the unintelligible."
[H.L. Mencken, "Prejudices"]
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sean C" |
|
| Title: Re: Naw, no connection at all, nope nope nope. |
28 Jun 2005 12:05:59 AM |
|
|
In article <1119881610.d7ad439ed0e794eda3e9eed555f96039@teranews>, Fred
Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
http://regimechangeiran.blogspot.com/2005/06/document-shows-irans-business-
ties-to.html
http://makeashorterlink.com/?W33F2655B
Funny, I see French and English, but not Arabic or Farsi on the
document shown. The document also appears to be an agreement between a
French and a Portuguese company---no mention of bin Laden or Iran.
Of course, we dare not mention the Bush family's--or the CIA's--ties to
bin Laden.
Sean C
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Naw, no connection at all, nope nope nope. |
28 Jun 2005 12:51:44 AM |
|
|
Sean C <redhawk@burnspammersalive.com> wrote in
news:270620052005591859%redhawk@burnspammersalive.com:
In article <1119881610.d7ad439ed0e794eda3e9eed555f96039@teranews>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
http://regimechangeiran.blogspot.com/2005/06/document-shows-irans-
busi
ness- ties-to.html
http://makeashorterlink.com/?W33F2655B
Funny, I see French and English, but not Arabic or Farsi on the
document shown. The document also appears to be an agreement between a
French and a Portuguese company---no mention of bin Laden or Iran.
You'd seem a lot more credible if you had actually read the article
cited.
"This document, presented by the Iranian People's Fedaii Guerrillas to
the United Nations Security Council in 1996, it is a wire credit advice
on an Iraqi oil shipment to Iran and details the purchase of oil
products smuggled through Iran by Iranian Revolutionary Guards in
violation of the UN Sanctions. They took delivery of the oil in small
coastal tankers to avoid interception by the US-led naval blockade, then
turned it around and resold it. The final purchaser was the Al Shamal
Islamic Bank in Sudan, Bin Laden'?s own bank."
Of course, we dare not mention the Bush family's--or the CIA's--ties
to bin Laden.
I'll mention them myself to save you the trouble. The Bush family is
friendly with the bin Laden *family*, which disowned Osama years ago,
and the CIA gave support during the Afghan-USSR conflict to the Afghan
Mujaheddin (damn that's hard to type), of which Osama was a bit player.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"Metaphysics is almost always an attempt to prove
the incredible by an appeal to the unintelligible."
[H.L. Mencken, "Prejudices"]
.
|
|
|
| User: "G-Ride" |
|
| Title: Re: Naw, no connection at all, nope nope nope. |
28 Jun 2005 06:18:11 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:1119919911.3cde6d38edafd7dde122ee79b9f6e4ab@teranews...
You'd seem a lot more credible if you had actually read the article
cited.
If only Fred would follow his own advice.........
--
Aloha, G-Ride
"Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga."
- Dalai Llama
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sean C" |
|
| Title: Re: Naw, no connection at all, nope nope nope. |
28 Jun 2005 09:16:02 PM |
|
|
In article <1119919911.3cde6d38edafd7dde122ee79b9f6e4ab@teranews>, Fred
Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Sean C <redhawk@burnspammersalive.com> wrote in
news:270620052005591859%redhawk@burnspammersalive.com:
In article <1119881610.d7ad439ed0e794eda3e9eed555f96039@teranews>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
http://regimechangeiran.blogspot.com/2005/06/document-shows-irans-
busi
ness- ties-to.html
http://makeashorterlink.com/?W33F2655B
Funny, I see French and English, but not Arabic or Farsi on the
document shown. The document also appears to be an agreement between a
French and a Portuguese company---no mention of bin Laden or Iran.
You'd seem a lot more credible if you had actually read the article
cited.
You'd seem more credible if you actually read the document they posted
as "evidence" of this assertion, and realized that it said nothing
about the Iranians or bin Laden. It did mention the Al Shamal bank,
which has links to bin Laden, but it also has links to other prominent
Saudis associated with Bush, and Bush has prevented an investigation of
this and other banks believed to be linked to the insider trading of
American Airlines stock that occurred prior to 9-11.
"This document, presented by the Iranian People's Fedaii Guerrillas to
the United Nations Security Council in 1996, it is a wire credit advice
on an Iraqi oil shipment to Iran and details the purchase of oil
products smuggled through Iran by Iranian Revolutionary Guards in
violation of the UN Sanctions. They took delivery of the oil in small
coastal tankers to avoid interception by the US-led naval blockade, then
turned it around and resold it. The final purchaser was the Al Shamal
Islamic Bank in Sudan, Bin Laden'?s own bank."
Of course, we dare not mention the Bush family's--or the CIA's--ties
to bin Laden.
I'll mention them myself to save you the trouble. The Bush family is
friendly with the bin Laden *family*, which disowned Osama years ago,
"Disowned" him with $300 million dollars. Yeah right. Of course, if bin
Laden was caught with an Iranian postcard in his pocket, that would be
enough evidence for your lot to conclude the Iranians are involved in
his terrorist activities, and launch an invasion slaughtering
thousands. But the Bush family doing millions of dollars of business
with the bin ladens, preventing an investigation of illegal banking
activities by Osama, his family and other Saudis, and the bin Ladens
getting the contracts to build American bases in Saudi Arabai as well
as many of the contracts to rebuild Kuwait after the Gulf War...none of
this even registers a blip on your radar screen nor can be seen as
evidence of anything.
and the CIA gave support during the Afghan-USSR conflict to the Afghan
Mujaheddin (damn that's hard to type), of which Osama was a bit player.
A "bit player" responsible for funneling the majority of the money and
supplies to the mujahedeen; some $2 billion worth--the most expensive
operation in CIA history.
Sean C
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Naw, no connection at all, nope nope nope. |
28 Jun 2005 09:47:10 PM |
|
|
Sean C <redhawk@burnspammersalive.com> wrote in
news:280620051716020446%redhawk@burnspammersalive.com:
In article <1119919911.3cde6d38edafd7dde122ee79b9f6e4ab@teranews>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Sean C <redhawk@burnspammersalive.com> wrote in
news:270620052005591859%redhawk@burnspammersalive.com:
In article <1119881610.d7ad439ed0e794eda3e9eed555f96039@teranews>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
http://regimechangeiran.blogspot.com/2005/06/document-shows-irans-
business- ties-to.html
http://makeashorterlink.com/?W33F2655B
Funny, I see French and English, but not Arabic or Farsi on the
document shown. The document also appears to be an agreement
between a French and a Portuguese company---no mention of bin Laden
or Iran.
You'd seem a lot more credible if you had actually read the article
cited.
You'd seem more credible if you actually read the document they posted
as "evidence" of this assertion, and realized that it said nothing
about the Iranians or bin Laden. It did mention the Al Shamal bank,
which has links to bin Laden, but it also has links to other prominent
Saudis associated with Bush, and Bush has prevented an investigation
of this and other banks believed to be linked to the insider trading
of American Airlines stock that occurred prior to 9-11.
Cites?
"This document, presented by the Iranian People's Fedaii Guerrillas
to the United Nations Security Council in 1996, it is a wire credit
advice on an Iraqi oil shipment to Iran and details the purchase of
oil products smuggled through Iran by Iranian Revolutionary Guards in
violation of the UN Sanctions. They took delivery of the oil in small
coastal tankers to avoid interception by the US-led naval blockade,
then turned it around and resold it. The final purchaser was the Al
Shamal Islamic Bank in Sudan, Bin Laden'?s own bank."
Of course, we dare not mention the Bush family's--or the
CIA's--ties to bin Laden.
I'll mention them myself to save you the trouble. The Bush family is
friendly with the bin Laden *family*, which disowned Osama years ago,
"Disowned" him with $300 million dollars. Yeah right. Of course, if
bin Laden was caught with an Iranian postcard in his pocket, that
would be enough evidence for your lot to conclude the Iranians are
involved in his terrorist activities, and launch an invasion
slaughtering thousands. But the Bush family doing millions of dollars
of business with the bin ladens, preventing an investigation of
illegal banking activities by Osama, his family and other Saudis, and
the bin Ladens getting the contracts to build American bases in Saudi
Arabai as well as many of the contracts to rebuild Kuwait after the
Gulf War...none of this even registers a blip on your radar screen nor
can be seen as evidence of anything.
Cites?
and the CIA gave support during the Afghan-USSR conflict to the
Afghan Mujaheddin (damn that's hard to type), of which Osama was a
bit player.
A "bit player" responsible for funneling the majority of the money
and supplies to the mujahedeen; some $2 billion worth--the most
expensive operation in CIA history.
more cites?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"Metaphysics is almost always an attempt to prove
the incredible by an appeal to the unintelligible."
[H.L. Mencken, "Prejudices"]
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|