| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Pinku-Sensei" |
| Date: |
13 Nov 2006 12:12:19 AM |
| Object: |
New Crackpot Index for Biology |
Here's a link to a crackpot index specifically designed to measure the
level of kookery of people claiming revolutionary advances (or other novel
claims) in biology.
The evolution crackpot index, created by John Wilkins.
http://scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts/2006/11/the_evolution_crackpot_ind
ex.php
This is a work in progress--note the comments--so I'm not reproducing it,
not yet.
--
Pinku-Sensei
http://netcabal.com/auk
.
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
17 Nov 2006 04:17:25 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:55:04 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
- Refer: <3c8sl25734556e5f06bvgvnfpbdsobees0@bbb.org>
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 12:11:08 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:36:00 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
- Refer: <0hojl21rtcbov36058egs48ujrm3rcbrqs@bbb.org>
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 08:59:48 -0600, Josh Miles <no@thanks.com> wrote:
Pedro Sanchez wrote:
I believe most people thought Darwin was a Kook while he was alive.
Frued was called a Kook. Those crazy people who thought cheese DID NOT
create mice were called Kooks.
This is a logical fallacy. Can you figure out why?
Uh, because people are Kooks for sometimes centuries until thousands
are executed for following that Kook until finally someone says,
"Whoops-a-daisy, he was right after all, lol"
You could have just said: "NO!"
I'm not going to let you off easy. Kooks like you need to bury
themselves with facts you made up after watching an episode of the
x-files.
You must have me confused with someone else.
I do not watch television.
If you cannot point to a fact that I have made up, then I invite you
to stop lying about me.
(Just who is the kook here?)
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pedro Sanchez" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
19 Nov 2006 08:46:43 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 08:47:25 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
If you cannot point to a fact that I have made up, then I invite you
to stop lying about me.
(Just who is the kook here?)
You're a kook, liar and coward.
Be gone!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
19 Nov 2006 02:30:58 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:46:43 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
- Refer: <5ir0m2t2of14ou562i0o36l4bl4k23rgpu@bbb.org>
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 08:47:25 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
If you cannot point to a fact that I have made up, then I invite you
to stop lying about me.
(Just who is the kook here?)
You're a kook, liar and coward.
Be gone!
alt.atheism is a mirror.
Look deep and long, libellous kook.
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pedro Sanchez" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
20 Nov 2006 09:46:49 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:00:58 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:46:43 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
- Refer: <5ir0m2t2of14ou562i0o36l4bl4k23rgpu@bbb.org>
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 08:47:25 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
If you cannot point to a fact that I have made up, then I invite you
to stop lying about me.
(Just who is the kook here?)
You're a kook, liar and coward.
Be gone!
alt.atheism is a mirror.
Look deep and long, libellous kook.
Libel can only be proved in a publication. Usent isn't a publican.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
20 Nov 2006 03:37:20 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:46:49 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
- Refer: <9ej3m21h7m32c3dcka687dfko98j70pcvs@bbb.org>
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:00:58 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:46:43 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
- Refer: <5ir0m2t2of14ou562i0o36l4bl4k23rgpu@bbb.org>
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 08:47:25 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
If you cannot point to a fact that I have made up, then I invite you
to stop lying about me.
(Just who is the kook here?)
You're a kook, liar and coward.
Be gone!
alt.atheism is a mirror.
Look deep and long, libellous kook.
Libel can only be proved in a publication. Usent isn't a publican.
Did I mention: an illiterate, ignorant *and* libellous kook?
"Usent isn't a publican"!!!! :D
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pedro Sanchez" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
20 Nov 2006 04:11:03 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:07:20 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:46:49 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
- Refer: <9ej3m21h7m32c3dcka687dfko98j70pcvs@bbb.org>
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:00:58 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:46:43 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
- Refer: <5ir0m2t2of14ou562i0o36l4bl4k23rgpu@bbb.org>
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 08:47:25 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
If you cannot point to a fact that I have made up, then I invite you
to stop lying about me.
(Just who is the kook here?)
You're a kook, liar and coward.
Be gone!
alt.atheism is a mirror.
Look deep and long, libellous kook.
Libel can only be proved in a publication. Usent isn't a publican.
Did I mention: an illiterate, ignorant *and* libellous kook?
"Usent isn't a publican"!!!! :D
It's not a publication. Perhaps you should look up the requirements
for something to be considered a publication?
Otherwise, go have sex with your mother.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
21 Nov 2006 02:10:10 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:11:03 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
- Refer: <4u94m2l7h0gj1mo0qavoadaaalis7og6uv@bbb.org>
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:07:20 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:46:49 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
- Refer: <9ej3m21h7m32c3dcka687dfko98j70pcvs@bbb.org>
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:00:58 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:46:43 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
- Refer: <5ir0m2t2of14ou562i0o36l4bl4k23rgpu@bbb.org>
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 08:47:25 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
If you cannot point to a fact that I have made up, then I invite you
to stop lying about me.
(Just who is the kook here?)
You're a kook, liar and coward.
Be gone!
alt.atheism is a mirror.
Look deep and long, libellous kook.
Libel can only be proved in a publication. Usent isn't a publican.
Did I mention: an illiterate, ignorant *and* libellous kook?
"Usent isn't a publican"!!!! :D
It's not a publication. Perhaps you should look up the requirements
for something to be considered a publication?
Otherwise, go have sex with your mother.
Add: "puerile foul-mouthed guttersnipe" to: illiterate, ignorant *and*
libellous kook!
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
19 Nov 2006 12:50:26 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:46:43 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 08:47:25 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
If you cannot point to a fact that I have made up, then I invite you
to stop lying about me.
(Just who is the kook here?)
You're a kook, liar and coward.
Be gone!
Translation: I can't.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
Imagine the people who believe such things and who are not ashamed
to ignore totally all the patient findings of thinking minds through all
the centuries since the Bible was written. And it is these ignorant
people, the most uneducated, the most unimaginative, the most unthinking
among us who would make themselves the guides and leaders of us all, who
would force their feeble and childish beliefs on us, who would invade
our schools and libraries and homes.
- Isaac Asimov
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Josh Miles" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
14 Nov 2006 01:03:54 PM |
|
|
Pedro Sanchez wrote:
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 08:59:48 -0600, Josh Miles <no@thanks.com> wrote:
Pedro Sanchez wrote:
I believe most people thought Darwin was a Kook while he was alive.
Frued was called a Kook. Those crazy people who thought cheese DID NOT
create mice were called Kooks.
This is a logical fallacy. Can you figure out why?
Uh, because people are Kooks for sometimes centuries until thousands
are executed for following that Kook until finally someone says,
"Whoops-a-daisy, he was right after all, lol"
Didn't think so.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pedro Sanchez" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
14 Nov 2006 06:08:43 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:03:54 -0600, Josh Miles <no@thanks.com> wrote:
Pedro Sanchez wrote:
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 08:59:48 -0600, Josh Miles <no@thanks.com> wrote:
Pedro Sanchez wrote:
I believe most people thought Darwin was a Kook while he was alive.
Frued was called a Kook. Those crazy people who thought cheese DID NOT
create mice were called Kooks.
This is a logical fallacy. Can you figure out why?
Uh, because people are Kooks for sometimes centuries until thousands
are executed for following that Kook until finally someone says,
"Whoops-a-daisy, he was right after all, lol"
Didn't think so.
You don't think a lot.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
14 Nov 2006 07:36:37 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 19:08:43 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:03:54 -0600, Josh Miles <no@thanks.com> wrote:
Pedro Sanchez wrote:
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 08:59:48 -0600, Josh Miles <no@thanks.com> wrote:
Pedro Sanchez wrote:
I believe most people thought Darwin was a Kook while he was alive.
Frued was called a Kook. Those crazy people who thought cheese DID NOT
create mice were called Kooks.
This is a logical fallacy. Can you figure out why?
Uh, because people are Kooks for sometimes centuries until thousands
are executed for following that Kook until finally someone says,
"Whoops-a-daisy, he was right after all, lol"
Didn't think so.
You don't think a lot.
But you still can't figure out why it's a logical fallacy.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"For aught we know a priori, matter may contain the source, or spring, of order
originating within itself, as well as the mind does."
- David Hume, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Officer" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
16 Nov 2006 01:47:07 PM |
|
|
On 13 Nov 2006 06:12:19 GMT, in alt.fan.art-bell, "Pinku-Sensei"
<pinku-sensei@netcabal.com> wrote:
Here's a link to a crackpot index specifically designed to measure the
level of kookery of people claiming revolutionary advances (or other novel
claims) in biology.
The evolution crackpot index, created by John Wilkins.
http://scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts/2006/11/the_evolution_crackpot_ind
ex.php
This is a work in progress--note the comments--so I'm not reproducing it,
not yet.
There was a point about 15 years ago that someone in sci.astronomy
devised a charting/measuring scheme for various kook...
--
Ak'toh'di
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pedro Sanchez" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
17 Nov 2006 02:56:03 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:47:07 -0800, Bob Officer
<bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote:
On 13 Nov 2006 06:12:19 GMT, in alt.fan.art-bell, "Pinku-Sensei"
<pinku-sensei@netcabal.com> wrote:
Here's a link to a crackpot index specifically designed to measure the
level of kookery of people claiming revolutionary advances (or other novel
claims) in biology.
The evolution crackpot index, created by John Wilkins.
http://scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts/2006/11/the_evolution_crackpot_ind
ex.php
This is a work in progress--note the comments--so I'm not reproducing it,
not yet.
There was a point about 15 years ago that someone in sci.astronomy
devised a charting/measuring scheme for various kook...
Guess what. That was a Kook who designed that scale of Kooks. Only
Kooks would devise scales to rate various Kooks.
Kooks like to talk about Kooks.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
17 Nov 2006 04:17:53 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:56:03 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
- Refer: <od8sl2p8k5v3aoc7bc2atilvspgh1j9pe4@bbb.org>
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:47:07 -0800, Bob Officer
<bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote:
On 13 Nov 2006 06:12:19 GMT, in alt.fan.art-bell, "Pinku-Sensei"
<pinku-sensei@netcabal.com> wrote:
Here's a link to a crackpot index specifically designed to measure the
level of kookery of people claiming revolutionary advances (or other novel
claims) in biology.
The evolution crackpot index, created by John Wilkins.
http://scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts/2006/11/the_evolution_crackpot_ind
ex.php
This is a work in progress--note the comments--so I'm not reproducing it,
not yet.
There was a point about 15 years ago that someone in sci.astronomy
devised a charting/measuring scheme for various kook...
Guess what. That was a Kook who designed that scale of Kooks. Only
Kooks would devise scales to rate various Kooks.
Kooks like to talk about Kooks.
As you amply demonstrate.
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pedro Sanchez" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
19 Nov 2006 08:47:08 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 08:47:53 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:56:03 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
- Refer: <od8sl2p8k5v3aoc7bc2atilvspgh1j9pe4@bbb.org>
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:47:07 -0800, Bob Officer
<bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote:
On 13 Nov 2006 06:12:19 GMT, in alt.fan.art-bell, "Pinku-Sensei"
<pinku-sensei@netcabal.com> wrote:
Here's a link to a crackpot index specifically designed to measure the
level of kookery of people claiming revolutionary advances (or other novel
claims) in biology.
The evolution crackpot index, created by John Wilkins.
http://scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts/2006/11/the_evolution_crackpot_ind
ex.php
This is a work in progress--note the comments--so I'm not reproducing it,
not yet.
There was a point about 15 years ago that someone in sci.astronomy
devised a charting/measuring scheme for various kook...
Guess what. That was a Kook who designed that scale of Kooks. Only
Kooks would devise scales to rate various Kooks.
Kooks like to talk about Kooks.
As you amply demonstrate.
Fancy words from a Fancy Kook.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
19 Nov 2006 02:33:30 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:47:08 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
- Refer: <vir0m2p53pmi73pmvrtov40t52cs9qhe4g@bbb.org>
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 08:47:53 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:56:03 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
- Refer: <od8sl2p8k5v3aoc7bc2atilvspgh1j9pe4@bbb.org>
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:47:07 -0800, Bob Officer
<bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote:
On 13 Nov 2006 06:12:19 GMT, in alt.fan.art-bell, "Pinku-Sensei"
<pinku-sensei@netcabal.com> wrote:
Here's a link to a crackpot index specifically designed to measure the
level of kookery of people claiming revolutionary advances (or other novel
claims) in biology.
The evolution crackpot index, created by John Wilkins.
http://scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts/2006/11/the_evolution_crackpot_ind
ex.php
This is a work in progress--note the comments--so I'm not reproducing it,
not yet.
There was a point about 15 years ago that someone in sci.astronomy
devised a charting/measuring scheme for various kook...
Guess what. That was a Kook who designed that scale of Kooks. Only
Kooks would devise scales to rate various Kooks.
Kooks like to talk about Kooks.
As you amply demonstrate.
Fancy words from a Fancy Kook.
High praise indeed, coming from a renowned expert on the subject.
But what about some substance to your posts?
Your words are devout of intellectual calories.
Is it just possibvle that you have reached your cognitive limits with
simple infantile retorts?
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pedro Sanchez" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
20 Nov 2006 09:48:23 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:03:30 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:47:08 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
- Refer: <vir0m2p53pmi73pmvrtov40t52cs9qhe4g@bbb.org>
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 08:47:53 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:56:03 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
- Refer: <od8sl2p8k5v3aoc7bc2atilvspgh1j9pe4@bbb.org>
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:47:07 -0800, Bob Officer
<bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote:
On 13 Nov 2006 06:12:19 GMT, in alt.fan.art-bell, "Pinku-Sensei"
<pinku-sensei@netcabal.com> wrote:
Here's a link to a crackpot index specifically designed to measure the
level of kookery of people claiming revolutionary advances (or other novel
claims) in biology.
The evolution crackpot index, created by John Wilkins.
http://scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts/2006/11/the_evolution_crackpot_ind
ex.php
This is a work in progress--note the comments--so I'm not reproducing it,
not yet.
There was a point about 15 years ago that someone in sci.astronomy
devised a charting/measuring scheme for various kook...
Guess what. That was a Kook who designed that scale of Kooks. Only
Kooks would devise scales to rate various Kooks.
Kooks like to talk about Kooks.
As you amply demonstrate.
Fancy words from a Fancy Kook.
High praise indeed, coming from a renowned expert on the subject.
But what about some substance to your posts?
Your words are devout of intellectual calories.
Is it just possibvle that you have reached your cognitive limits with
simple infantile retorts?
Difference is that I can get to the fucking point whereas you spend
several unnecessary sentences blabbing about nonsense.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
20 Nov 2006 03:38:25 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:48:23 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
- Refer: <fgj3m2l0rguemcuelos62en6soan0d1ugu@bbb.org>
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:03:30 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:47:08 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
- Refer: <vir0m2p53pmi73pmvrtov40t52cs9qhe4g@bbb.org>
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 08:47:53 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:56:03 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
- Refer: <od8sl2p8k5v3aoc7bc2atilvspgh1j9pe4@bbb.org>
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:47:07 -0800, Bob Officer
<bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote:
On 13 Nov 2006 06:12:19 GMT, in alt.fan.art-bell, "Pinku-Sensei"
<pinku-sensei@netcabal.com> wrote:
Here's a link to a crackpot index specifically designed to measure the
level of kookery of people claiming revolutionary advances (or other novel
claims) in biology.
The evolution crackpot index, created by John Wilkins.
http://scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts/2006/11/the_evolution_crackpot_ind
ex.php
This is a work in progress--note the comments--so I'm not reproducing it,
not yet.
There was a point about 15 years ago that someone in sci.astronomy
devised a charting/measuring scheme for various kook...
Guess what. That was a Kook who designed that scale of Kooks. Only
Kooks would devise scales to rate various Kooks.
Kooks like to talk about Kooks.
As you amply demonstrate.
Fancy words from a Fancy Kook.
High praise indeed, coming from a renowned expert on the subject.
But what about some substance to your posts?
Your words are devout of intellectual calories.
Is it just possibvle that you have reached your cognitive limits with
simple infantile retorts?
Difference is that I can get to the fucking point whereas you spend
several unnecessary sentences blabbing about nonsense.
What, like just then?
You are amusing, in a sad loser sort of way.
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pedro Sanchez" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
20 Nov 2006 04:11:42 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:08:25 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
Difference is that I can get to the fucking point whereas you spend
several unnecessary sentences blabbing about nonsense.
What, like just then?
You are amusing, in a sad loser sort of way.
Go have oral sex with your mother while your wife watches.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
21 Nov 2006 02:11:12 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:11:42 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
- Refer: <c0a4m2910mnj6um1olao13iq2e4t2314he@bbb.org>
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:08:25 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
Difference is that I can get to the fucking point whereas you spend
several unnecessary sentences blabbing about nonsense.
What, like just then?
You are amusing, in a sad loser sort of way.
Go have oral sex with your mother while your wife watches.
My wife died not 6 months ago, you complete *****.
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pedro Sanchez" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
21 Nov 2006 10:41:04 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:41:12 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:11:42 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
- Refer: <c0a4m2910mnj6um1olao13iq2e4t2314he@bbb.org>
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:08:25 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
Difference is that I can get to the fucking point whereas you spend
several unnecessary sentences blabbing about nonsense.
What, like just then?
You are amusing, in a sad loser sort of way.
Go have oral sex with your mother while your wife watches.
My wife died not 6 months ago, you complete *****.
Sorry for your loss.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
21 Nov 2006 03:32:38 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:41:04 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
- Refer: <m0b6m2lfk7tbpvpm66b2jk4qv07a0rkosi@bbb.org>
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:41:12 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:11:42 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
- Refer: <c0a4m2910mnj6um1olao13iq2e4t2314he@bbb.org>
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:08:25 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
Difference is that I can get to the fucking point whereas you spend
several unnecessary sentences blabbing about nonsense.
What, like just then?
You are amusing, in a sad loser sort of way.
Go have oral sex with your mother while your wife watches.
My wife died not 6 months ago, you complete *****.
Sorry for your loss.
I shall accept that as sincere.
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
17 Nov 2006 04:42:12 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:56:03 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
Kooks like to talk about Kooks.
And you're talking about kooks ...
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"My position concerning God is that of an agnostic. I am convinced that a vivid
consciousness of the primary importance of moral principles for the betterment and
ennoblement of life does not need the idea of a law-giver, especially a law-giver who
works on the basis of reward and punishment. "
- Letter to M. Berkowitz, October 25, 1950; Einstein Archive 59-215
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
This signature was made by SigChanger.
You can find SigChanger at: http://www.phranc.nl/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pedro Sanchez" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
19 Nov 2006 08:47:28 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 17:42:12 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:56:03 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
Kooks like to talk about Kooks.
And you're talking about kooks ...
You just did, so you're a Kook.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
19 Nov 2006 12:06:11 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:47:28 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 17:42:12 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:56:03 -0500, Pedro Sanchez
<Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
Kooks like to talk about Kooks.
And you're talking about kooks ...
You just did, so you're a Kook.
Or you're wrong.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything."
- Friedrich Nietzsche
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Officer" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
19 Nov 2006 05:40:47 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:56:03 -0500, in alt.fan.art-bell, Pedro
Sanchez <Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:47:07 -0800, Bob Officer
<bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote:
On 13 Nov 2006 06:12:19 GMT, in alt.fan.art-bell, "Pinku-Sensei"
<pinku-sensei@netcabal.com> wrote:
Here's a link to a crackpot index specifically designed to measure the
level of kookery of people claiming revolutionary advances (or other novel
claims) in biology.
The evolution crackpot index, created by John Wilkins.
http://scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts/2006/11/the_evolution_crackpot_ind
ex.php
This is a work in progress--note the comments--so I'm not reproducing it,
not yet.
There was a point about 15 years ago that someone in sci.astronomy
devised a charting/measuring scheme for various kooks...
Guess what. That was a Kook who designed that scale of Kooks. Only
Kooks would devise scales to rate various Kooks.
It was a method of place kooks and crackpots on a scale...
Who is the bigger Kook Art Bell or Hoagie
Kooks like to talk about Kooks.
It was a effort at measuring how far over the wall some people had
gone.
--
Ak'toh'di
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pedro Sanchez" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
20 Nov 2006 09:50:04 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:40:47 -0800, Bob Officer
<bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote:
Who is the bigger Kook Art Bell or Hoagie
Hoaxie is bigger Kook. That was easy.
Kooks like to talk about Kooks.
It was a effort at measuring how far over the wall some people had
gone.
Think about it for a second:You, or someone, made a scale rating
kooks. Doesn't that sound like something a KOOK would do?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Officer" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
20 Nov 2006 10:35:48 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:50:04 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks, Pedro
Sanchez <Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:40:47 -0800, Bob Officer
<bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote:
Who is the bigger Kook Art Bell or Hoagie
Hoaxie is bigger Kook. That was easy.
Kooks like to talk about Kooks.
It was a effort at measuring how far over the wall some people had
gone.
Think about it for a second:You, or someone, made a scale rating
kooks. Doesn't that sound like something a KOOK would do?
No.
This person took a few well know elements of what seem it takes makes
a person a kook. he divide the combinations of elements in too
directional by families. IIRC one of them was belief in a line of
thinking even when confronted with evidence which contradicts the
belief.
The other line was use of a pseudo science... IIRC, this was 15 years
ago.
he used three examples Alexander Albian, Charles "chuckie" Cagle, and
Archie Plutonium... He carefully read and plotted their kookiness on
this graph... it was a sociology experiment of sorts. Other people
found they could plot other people including themselves one this
graph. To be placed in the extreme, one had to really go overboard.
in the end there was about 20 well known kooks and persons plotted.
including Robert Larson, Hoaxie, Bell, Edmond Wollmann, Kazoo, Nancy
Lieder, Ed Conrad, robert mcelwhine, boatwright and a few other
people.
It wasn't a kooky thing to do. it was an early effort to chart and
track idiosyncracies, and what was people would either move up or
down the graph over time.
--
Bob Officer
COOSN-266-06-01986
Hammer of Thor, Sept 2005
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pedro Sanchez" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
20 Nov 2006 02:44:42 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:35:48 -0800, Bob Officer
<bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote:
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:50:04 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks, Pedro
Sanchez <Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:40:47 -0800, Bob Officer
<bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote:
Who is the bigger Kook Art Bell or Hoagie
Hoaxie is bigger Kook. That was easy.
Kooks like to talk about Kooks.
It was a effort at measuring how far over the wall some people had
gone.
Think about it for a second:You, or someone, made a scale rating
kooks. Doesn't that sound like something a KOOK would do?
No.
This person took a few well know elements of what seem it takes makes
a person a kook. he divide the combinations of elements in too
directional by families. IIRC one of them was belief in a line of
thinking even when confronted with evidence which contradicts the
belief.
The other line was use of a pseudo science... IIRC, this was 15 years
ago.
he used three examples Alexander Albian, Charles "chuckie" Cagle, and
Archie Plutonium... He carefully read and plotted their kookiness on
this graph... it was a sociology experiment of sorts. Other people
found they could plot other people including themselves one this
graph. To be placed in the extreme, one had to really go overboard.
in the end there was about 20 well known kooks and persons plotted.
including Robert Larson, Hoaxie, Bell, Edmond Wollmann, Kazoo, Nancy
Lieder, Ed Conrad, robert mcelwhine, boatwright and a few other
people.
It wasn't a kooky thing to do. it was an early effort to chart and
track idiosyncracies, and what was people would either move up or
down the graph over time.
Could you use less complicated words and no abbreviations for phrases
and re-explain that to me again?
Thanks
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Officer" |
|
| Title: Re: New Crackpot Index for Biology |
22 Nov 2006 03:19:30 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:44:42 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks, Pedro
Sanchez <Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:35:48 -0800, Bob Officer
<bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote:
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:50:04 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks, Pedro
Sanchez <Dr.PedroSanchez@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:40:47 -0800, Bob Officer
<bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote:
Who is the bigger Kook Art Bell or Hoagie
Hoaxie is bigger Kook. That was easy.
Kooks like to talk about Kooks.
It was a effort at measuring how far over the wall some people had
gone.
Think about it for a second:You, or someone, made a scale rating
kooks. Doesn't that sound like something a KOOK would do?
No.
This person took a few well know elements of what seem it takes makes
a person a kook. he divide the combinations of elements in too
directional by families. IIRC one of them was belief in a line of
thinking even when confronted with evidence which contradicts the
belief.
The other line was use of a pseudo science... IIRC, this was 15 years
ago.
he used three examples Alexander Albian, Charles "chuckie" Cagle, and
Archie Plutonium... He carefully read and plotted their kookiness on
this graph... it was a sociology experiment of sorts. Other people
found they could plot other people including themselves one this
graph. To be placed in the extreme, one had to really go overboard.
in the end there was about 20 well known kooks and persons plotted.
including Robert Larson, Hoaxie, Bell, Edmond Wollmann, Kazoo, Nancy
Lieder, Ed Conrad, robert mcelwhine, boatwright and a few other
people.
It wasn't a kooky thing to do. it was an early effort to chart and
track idiosyncracies, and what was people would either move up or
down the graph over time.
Could you use less complicated words and no abbreviations for phrases
and re-explain that to me again?
Thanks
No
--
Bob Officer
COOSN-266-06-01986
Hammer of Thor, Sept 2005
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
