Religions > Atheism > New proof in revised article confirming the Carboniferous human skullcap
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Lin Liangtai" |
| Date: |
17 Nov 2007 09:47:13 PM |
| Object: |
New proof in revised article confirming the Carboniferous human skullcap |
New SEM confirms Mr. Conrad's Carboniferus human skull cap.
The original article "An evaluation on a Carboniferous human calvarium
fossil" has been revised and updated with new SEM (in the Results
section of the article) in revised albums.
All above is in the webpage:
http://fossilhandle.blogspot.com
I formally offer US$20,000 to anyone who can disprove my claim.
Lin Liangtai
.
|
|
| User: "Timothy 1:4a" |
|
| Title: Re: New proof in revised article confirming the Carboniferous humanskull cap |
17 Nov 2007 09:57:25 PM |
|
|
On Nov 17, 10:47 pm, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
New SEM confirms Mr. Conrad's Carboniferus human skull cap.
The original article "An evaluation on a Carboniferous human calvarium
fossil" has been revised and updated with new SEM (in the Results
section of the article) in revised albums.
All above is in the webpage:http://fossilhandle.blogspot.com
I formally offer US$20,000 to anyone who can disprove my claim.
Lin Liangtai
For Pete's sake, don't post it here - what can I do about it? Get your
samples to a university and get some peer review. That's how science
is done.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lin Liangtai" |
|
| Title: Re: New proof in revised article confirming the Carboniferous humanskull cap |
18 Nov 2007 03:16:06 AM |
|
|
On 11$B7n(B18$BF|(B, $B>e8a(B11$B;~(B57$BJ,(B, "Timothy 1:4a" <canfanor...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 17, 10:47 pm, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
New SEM confirms Mr. Conrad's Carboniferus human skull cap.
The original article "An evaluation on a Carboniferous human calvarium
fossil" has been revised and updated with new SEM (in the Results
section of the article) in revised albums.
All above is in the webpage:http://fossilhandle.blogspot.com
I formally offer US$20,000 to anyone who can disprove my claim.
Lin Liangtai
For Pete's sake, don't post it here - what can I do about it? Get your
samples to a university and get some peer review. That's how science
is done.
No peer wants to review it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cj" |
|
| Title: Re: New proof in revised article confirming the Carboniferous human skull cap |
18 Nov 2007 07:42:07 AM |
|
|
"Lin Liangtai" <lin440315@yahoo.com.tw> wrote in message
news:411beaac-8efe-419f-b4fd-193074a341a5@s6g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
On 11$B7n(B18$BF|(B, $B>e8a(B11$B;~(B57$BJ,(B, "Timothy 1:4a" <canfanor...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 17, 10:47 pm, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
New SEM confirms Mr. Conrad's Carboniferus human skull cap.
The original article "An evaluation on a Carboniferous human calvarium
fossil" has been revised and updated with new SEM (in the Results
section of the article) in revised albums.
All above is in the webpage:http://fossilhandle.blogspot.com
I formally offer US$20,000 to anyone who can disprove my claim.
Lin Liangtai
For Pete's sake, don't post it here - what can I do about it? Get your
samples to a university and get some peer review. That's how science
is done.
No peer wants to review it.
Forward the damned thing to a journal of your choice, the editor might
arrange for peer review if it appears to be real science. That's the way
it's done in science. How the hell do you gain access to a SEM and not know
about scientific writing and publishing? You've been proclaimed a
"scientist" in your postings and Ed Conrad's postings, how come you don't
know about peer review?
Cj
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lin Liangtai" |
|
| Title: Re: New proof in revised article confirming the Carboniferous humanskull cap |
19 Nov 2007 07:31:55 AM |
|
|
On 11$B7n(B18$BF|(B, $B2<8a(B9$B;~(B42$BJ,(B, "Cj" <cw...@gwi.net> wrote:
"Lin Liangtai" <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote in message
news:411beaac-8efe-419f-b4fd-193074a341a5@s6g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
On 11$B7n(B18$BF|(B, $B>e8a(B11$B;~(B57$BJ,(B, "Timothy 1:4a" <canfanor...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 17, 10:47 pm, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
New SEM confirms Mr. Conrad's Carboniferus human skull cap.
The original article "An evaluation on a Carboniferous human calvarium
fossil" has been revised and updated with new SEM (in the Results
section of the article) in revised albums.
All above is in the webpage:http://fossilhandle.blogspot.com
I formally offer US$20,000 to anyone who can disprove my claim.
Lin Liangtai
For Pete's sake, don't post it here - what can I do about it? Get your
samples to a university and get some peer review. That's how science
is done.
No peer wants to review it.
Forward the damned thing to a journal of your choice, the editor might
arrange for peer review if it appears to be real science. That's the way
it's done in science. How the hell do you gain access to a SEM and not know
about scientific writing and publishing? You've been proclaimed a
"scientist" in your postings and Ed Conrad's postings, how come you don't
know about peer review?
Cj- $Bp,i6Ho0zMQJ8;z(B -
- $Bp}<(Ho0zMQJ8;z(B -
A journal asked a peer to review my article. The peer said
all my SEM/micrographs show "typical minerals"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ye Old One" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: New proof in revised article confirming the Carboniferous human skull cap |
19 Nov 2007 02:44:47 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 05:31:55 -0800 (PST), Lin Liangtai
<lin440315@yahoo.com.tw> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On 11?18?, ??9?42?, "Cj" <cw...@gwi.net> wrote:
"Lin Liangtai" <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote in message
news:411beaac-8efe-419f-b4fd-193074a341a5@s6g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
On 11?18?, ??11?57?, "Timothy 1:4a" <canfanor...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 17, 10:47 pm, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
New SEM confirms Mr. Conrad's Carboniferus human skull cap.
The original article "An evaluation on a Carboniferous human calvarium
fossil" has been revised and updated with new SEM (in the Results
section of the article) in revised albums.
All above is in the webpage:http://fossilhandle.blogspot.com
I formally offer US$20,000 to anyone who can disprove my claim.
Lin Liangtai
For Pete's sake, don't post it here - what can I do about it? Get your
samples to a university and get some peer review. That's how science
is done.
No peer wants to review it.
Forward the damned thing to a journal of your choice, the editor might
arrange for peer review if it appears to be real science. That's the way
it's done in science. How the hell do you gain access to a SEM and not know
about scientific writing and publishing? You've been proclaimed a
"scientist" in your postings and Ed Conrad's postings, how come you don't
know about peer review?
Cj- ??????? -
- ??????? -
A journal asked a peer to review my article. The peer said
all my SEM/micrographs show "typical minerals"
People have been telling you that for a very long time.
--
Bob.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lin Liangtai" |
|
| Title: Re: New proof in revised article confirming the Carboniferous humanskull cap |
21 Nov 2007 07:20:13 AM |
|
|
On 11$B7n(B20$BF|(B, $B>e8a(B4$B;~(B44$BJ,(B, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 05:31:55 -0800 (PST), Lin Liangtai
<lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On 11?18?, ??9?42?, "Cj" <cw...@gwi.net> wrote:
"Lin Liangtai" <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote in message
news:411beaac-8efe-419f-b4fd-193074a341a5@s6g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
On 11?18?, ??11?57?, "Timothy 1:4a" <canfanor...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 17, 10:47 pm, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
New SEM confirms Mr. Conrad's Carboniferus human skull cap.
The original article "An evaluation on a Carboniferous human calvarium
fossil" has been revised and updated with new SEM (in the Results
section of the article) in revised albums.
All above is in the webpage:http://fossilhandle.blogspot.com
I formally offer US$20,000 to anyone who can disprove my claim.
Lin Liangtai
For Pete's sake, don't post it here - what can I do about it? Get your
samples to a university and get some peer review. That's how science
is done.
No peer wants to review it.
Forward the damned thing to a journal of your choice, the editor might
arrange for peer review if it appears to be real science. That's the way
it's done in science. How the hell do you gain access to a SEM and not know
about scientific writing and publishing? You've been proclaimed a
"scientist" in your postings and Ed Conrad's postings, how come you don't
know about peer review?
Cj- ??????? -
- ??????? -
A journal asked a peer to review my article. The peer said
all my SEM/micrographs show "typical minerals"
People have been telling you that for a very long time.
--
Bob.- $Bp,i6Ho0zMQJ8;z(B -
- $Bp}<(Ho0zMQJ8;z(B -
They are reserving a place in Hell.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: New proof in revised article confirming the Carboniferous humanskull cap |
21 Nov 2007 08:15:10 AM |
|
|
On 21 nov, 14:20, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
On 11$B7n(B20$BF|(B, $B>e8a(B4$B;~(B44$BJ,(B, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 05:31:55 -0800 (PST), Lin Liangtai
<lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On 11?18?, ??9?42?, "Cj" <cw...@gwi.net> wrote:
"Lin Liangtai" <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote in message
news:411beaac-8efe-419f-b4fd-193074a341a5@s6g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
On 11?18?, ??11?57?, "Timothy 1:4a" <canfanor...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 17, 10:47 pm, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
New SEM confirms Mr. Conrad's Carboniferus human skull cap.
The original article "An evaluation on a Carboniferous human calvarium
fossil" has been revised and updated with new SEM (in the Results
section of the article) in revised albums.
All above is in the webpage:http://fossilhandle.blogspot.com
I formally offer US$20,000 to anyone who can disprove my claim.
Lin Liangtai
For Pete's sake, don't post it here - what can I do about it? Get your
samples to a university and get some peer review. That's how science
is done.
No peer wants to review it.
Forward the damned thing to a journal of your choice, the editor might
arrange for peer review if it appears to be real science. That's the way
it's done in science. How the hell do you gain access to a SEM and not know
about scientific writing and publishing? You've been proclaimed a
"scientist" in your postings and Ed Conrad's postings, how come you don't
know about peer review?
Cj- ??????? -
- ??????? -
A journal asked a peer to review my article. The peer said
all my SEM/micrographs show "typical minerals"
People have been telling you that for a very long time.
--
Bob.- $Bp,i6Ho0zMQJ8;z(B -
- $Bp}<(Ho0zMQJ8;z(B -
They are reserving a place in Hell.
Now that is a very unscientific remark!
Unless - of course - you can proof they have made hotel-reservations
in Norway.
Do you have any proof for your remark ?
Until we see some,
we will have to ignore the words.
As for this article,
I will wait until the Newspapers present this gross overturn of all
paleontology as we now it. And even then I might not believe it!
If it is true time-travel seems likely to have happened,
and also to have been very dangerous!
(apperantly a species of Homo went back to a time when no mammals
existed and perished there).
Wow! Great science fiction becomes science fact!
See you when and if it gets any recognition.
Peter van Velzen
November 2007
Amstelveen
The Netherlands
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ye Old One" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: New proof in revised article confirming the Carboniferous human skull cap |
21 Nov 2007 03:48:27 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 05:20:13 -0800 (PST), Lin Liangtai
<lin440315@yahoo.com.tw> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On 11?20?, ??4?44?, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 05:31:55 -0800 (PST), Lin Liangtai
<lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On 11?18?, ??9?42?, "Cj" <cw...@gwi.net> wrote:
"Lin Liangtai" <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote in message
news:411beaac-8efe-419f-b4fd-193074a341a5@s6g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
On 11?18?, ??11?57?, "Timothy 1:4a" <canfanor...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 17, 10:47 pm, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
New SEM confirms Mr. Conrad's Carboniferus human skull cap.
The original article "An evaluation on a Carboniferous human calvarium
fossil" has been revised and updated with new SEM (in the Results
section of the article) in revised albums.
All above is in the webpage:http://fossilhandle.blogspot.com
I formally offer US$20,000 to anyone who can disprove my claim.
Lin Liangtai
For Pete's sake, don't post it here - what can I do about it? Get your
samples to a university and get some peer review. That's how science
is done.
No peer wants to review it.
Forward the damned thing to a journal of your choice, the editor might
arrange for peer review if it appears to be real science. That's the way
it's done in science. How the hell do you gain access to a SEM and not know
about scientific writing and publishing? You've been proclaimed a
"scientist" in your postings and Ed Conrad's postings, how come you don't
know about peer review?
Cj- ??????? -
- ??????? -
A journal asked a peer to review my article. The peer said
all my SEM/micrographs show "typical minerals"
People have been telling you that for a very long time.
--
Bob.- ??????? -
- ??????? -
They are reserving a place in Hell.
No such place.
What I am doing is calling you an idiot to believe that kook called Ed
Conrad.
Your continued delusions over them minerals you have make you a
laughing stock. None of your photos show what you claim - you are nuts
to think they do.
--
Bob.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ye Old One" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: New proof in revised article confirming the Carboniferous human skull cap |
18 Nov 2007 08:59:22 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 01:16:06 -0800 (PST), Lin Liangtai
<lin440315@yahoo.com.tw> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On 11?18?, ??11?57?, "Timothy 1:4a" <canfanor...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 17, 10:47 pm, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
New SEM confirms Mr. Conrad's Carboniferus human skull cap.
The original article "An evaluation on a Carboniferous human calvarium
fossil" has been revised and updated with new SEM (in the Results
section of the article) in revised albums.
All above is in the webpage:http://fossilhandle.blogspot.com
I formally offer US$20,000 to anyone who can disprove my claim.
Lin Liangtai
For Pete's sake, don't post it here - what can I do about it? Get your
samples to a university and get some peer review. That's how science
is done.
No peer wants to review it.
Because it is total nonsense.
--
Bob.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Most Reverend Dr. Hugh Jarse NLAHN." |
|
| Title: Re: New proof in revised article confirming the Carboniferous humanskull cap |
18 Nov 2007 08:10:38 AM |
|
|
On Nov 18, 3:47 am, Lin Liangtai <lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:
New SEM confirms Mr. Conrad's Carboniferus human skull cap.
The original article "An evaluation on a Carboniferous human calvarium
fossil" has been revised and updated with new SEM (in the Results
section of the article) in revised albums.
All above is in the webpage:http://fossilhandle.blogspot.com
I formally offer US$20,000 to anyone who can disprove my claim.
Lin Liangtai
Eddie the Eunuch was a weasel
Nasty as an old man's nose
Makin' believe he was evil
Struttin' in his mama's clothes.
So you know that Eddie had a bad connection, baby
Never had a chance to ball
Sleepin' in the wrong direction, baby
Dreamin' he was ten feet tall.
Eddie the Eunuch is a self styled scientist
Suckin' like a super star
Slicker than a shoe-shine, quicker than a two-time
Eddie, what a thing you are.
--- Instrumental ---
Eddie makes no kinda livin', baby
Puttin' reality down
Eddie couldn't ever forgive them, baby
'cause he wasn't Robert Brown.
Eddie the Eunuch is a self styled scientist
Suckin' like a super star
Slicker than a shoe-shine, quicker than a two-time
Eddie, what a thing you are...
Apologies to Kris Kristofferson.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ye Old One" |
|
| Title: Re: New proof in revised article confirming the Carboniferous human skull cap |
18 Nov 2007 08:58:48 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 19:47:13 -0800 (PST), Lin Liangtai
<lin440315@yahoo.com.tw> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
New SEM confirms Mr. Conrad's Carboniferus human skull cap.
Liar!
The original article "An evaluation on a Carboniferous human calvarium
fossil" has been revised and updated with new SEM (in the Results
section of the article) in revised albums.
All above is in the webpage:
http://fossilhandle.blogspot.com
I formally offer US$20,000 to anyone who can disprove my claim.
Lin Liangtai
Send the cheque.
--
Bob.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lin Liangtai" |
|
| Title: Re: New proof in revised article confirming the Carboniferous humanskull cap |
19 Nov 2007 07:36:19 AM |
|
|
On 11$B7n(B18$BF|(B, $B2<8a(B10$B;~(B58$BJ,(B, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 19:47:13 -0800 (PST), Lin Liangtai
<lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
New SEM confirms Mr. Conrad's Carboniferus human skull cap.
Liar!
The original article "An evaluation on a Carboniferous human calvarium
fossil" has been revised and updated with new SEM (in the Results
section of the article) in revised albums.
All above is in the webpage:
http://fossilhandle.blogspot.com
I formally offer US$20,000 to anyone who can disprove my claim.
Lin Liangtai
Send the cheque.
--
Bob.
Can you disprove it? Or do you just proclaim my SEM/micrographs
contain nothing but minerals, just as an anonymous reviewer (who I am
sure is a scientist) of my article said?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ye Old One" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: New proof in revised article confirming the Carboniferous human skull cap |
19 Nov 2007 02:46:10 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 05:36:19 -0800 (PST), Lin Liangtai
<lin440315@yahoo.com.tw> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On 11?18?, ??10?58?, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 19:47:13 -0800 (PST), Lin Liangtai
<lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
New SEM confirms Mr. Conrad's Carboniferus human skull cap.
Liar!
The original article "An evaluation on a Carboniferous human calvarium
fossil" has been revised and updated with new SEM (in the Results
section of the article) in revised albums.
All above is in the webpage:
http://fossilhandle.blogspot.com
I formally offer US$20,000 to anyone who can disprove my claim.
Lin Liangtai
Send the cheque.
--
Bob.
Can you disprove it?
Yes.
Or do you just proclaim my SEM/micrographs
contain nothing but minerals, just as an anonymous reviewer (who I am
sure is a scientist) of my article said?
That would be part of the disproof.
--
Bob.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lin Liangtai" |
|
| Title: Re: New proof in revised article confirming the Carboniferous humanskull cap |
21 Nov 2007 07:21:13 AM |
|
|
On 11$B7n(B20$BF|(B, $B>e8a(B4$B;~(B46$BJ,(B, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 05:36:19 -0800 (PST), Lin Liangtai
<lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On 11?18?, ??10?58?, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 19:47:13 -0800 (PST), Lin Liangtai
<lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
New SEM confirms Mr. Conrad's Carboniferus human skull cap.
Liar!
The original article "An evaluation on a Carboniferous human calvarium
fossil" has been revised and updated with new SEM (in the Results
section of the article) in revised albums.
All above is in the webpage:
http://fossilhandle.blogspot.com
I formally offer US$20,000 to anyone who can disprove my claim.
Lin Liangtai
Send the cheque.
--
Bob.
Can you disprove it?
Yes.
Or do you just proclaim my SEM/micrographs
contain nothing but minerals, just as an anonymous reviewer (who I am
sure is a scientist) of my article said?
That would be part of the disproof.
--
Bob.- $Bp,i6Ho0zMQJ8;z(B -
- $Bp}<(Ho0zMQJ8;z(B -
When experts are insane, the world in nearing Hell.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ye Old One" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: New proof in revised article confirming the Carboniferous human skull cap |
21 Nov 2007 03:50:05 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 05:21:13 -0800 (PST), Lin Liangtai
<lin440315@yahoo.com.tw> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On 11?20?, ??4?46?, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 05:36:19 -0800 (PST), Lin Liangtai
<lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On 11?18?, ??10?58?, Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net> wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 19:47:13 -0800 (PST), Lin Liangtai
<lin440...@yahoo.com.tw> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
New SEM confirms Mr. Conrad's Carboniferus human skull cap.
Liar!
The original article "An evaluation on a Carboniferous human calvarium
fossil" has been revised and updated with new SEM (in the Results
section of the article) in revised albums.
All above is in the webpage:
http://fossilhandle.blogspot.com
I formally offer US$20,000 to anyone who can disprove my claim.
Lin Liangtai
Send the cheque.
--
Bob.
Can you disprove it?
Yes.
Or do you just proclaim my SEM/micrographs
contain nothing but minerals, just as an anonymous reviewer (who I am
sure is a scientist) of my article said?
That would be part of the disproof.
--
Bob.- ??????? -
- ??????? -
When experts are insane,
I don't think the experts are - just you and that nutter Ed Conrad.
the world in nearing Hell.
No such place.
--
Bob.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
