********************************************************************
Hypothesis:
"makemyday@worldnet.att.net (makemyday@worldnet.att.net)" is DAFN

Proof:
Let us assume that " makemyday" is not DAFN.
Data: Nobel Peace Prizes awarded to "makemyday" in
ANYTHING: Zero(0)
Nobel Peace Prizes awarded to those with IQ of zero: Zero(0)
Number of referenced publications or lasting, notable
contributions to human knowledge that "makemyday" is
responsible for: Zero(0)

Thus "makemyday" has zero Nobel Peace Prizes and no contributions
at all. Moreover, it may not significantly matter to humanity if
"makemyday" was nonexistent OR had a IQ well below 75.

"Fact":
It is often stated as "fact" in the SCAA that DAFNz have zero
Nobel Peace Prizes and have IQ way below 75 and no contributions
at all.

Therefore "makemyday" cannot be excluded from the set of DAFNz as
identified in the "fact".
Therefore, the assumption that "makemyday" is not DAFN is wrong.

Fact: In this NG, there are only two distinct and separate
groups, the DAFNz and the those that are not DAFNz.

Therefore, the hypothesis is proved.

Hence "makemyday" is DAFN. QED
-----------------------------
Corollary:
"makemyday" is DAFN with IQ near or below zero.
(The proof is left as an exercise for the reader.)

********************************************************************

It is noted too that birds of a feather flock together.
And "makemyday" is a regular in the SCAA of those termed DAFNz.

Hence "makemyday" qualifies superbly as DAFNz with IQ near zero.

Who says "whites" in SCAA don't contribute anything to mankind???

Good Grief "makemyday"! Ma dallied behind the scenes!
Who's yer daddy, boy?!

King of "white" DAFNz in SCAA