| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"nero" |
| Date: |
31 Jan 2008 01:45:41 PM |
| Object: |
nomination |
From Bill M / 30jan08
Religion is not based on objective verifiable evidence.
Religion is things hoped for but not yet seen or proven.
Science is things seen and proven but not necessarily hoped for.
'Gotta love the keen minds in this group.
nero
____________________
.
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: nomination |
31 Jan 2008 09:39:48 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:45:41 -0000, nero <nero@austin.rr.com> wrote:
From Bill M / 30jan08
Religion is not based on objective verifiable evidence.
Religion is things hoped for but not yet seen or proven.
Science is things seen and proven but not necessarily hoped for.
'Gotta love the keen minds in this group.
nero
A most perspicacious and succinct observation on Bill's behalf.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Apostate" |
|
| Title: Re: nomination |
01 Feb 2008 12:26:35 AM |
|
|
In article <r255q35vrhcuoh341sm7o16lkaptidfucm@4ax.com>, Michael Gray says...
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:45:41 -0000, nero <nero@austin.rr.com> wrote:
From Bill M / 30jan08
Religion is not based on objective verifiable evidence.
Religion is things hoped for but not yet seen or proven.
Science is things seen and proven but not necessarily hoped for.
'Gotta love the keen minds in this group.
nero
A most perspicacious and succinct observation on Bill's behalf.
One harbors certain suspicions about BM's bona fides, seeing how the poster's pov
appears to shift rather fluidly when trolling opportunities lend themselves.
Unless we have more than one user of the same nick, and I've failed to notice
mail address distinctions.
--
Apostate a.a. #1931
..sig currently undergoing maintenance
mail to X-reply-to
want a free or premium posting account with Teranews?
https://secure.usenetbilling.com/newbilling/manageaccount.cgi?referredby=1089312943
&action=Create+New+Account&vendor=teranews
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: nomination |
01 Feb 2008 02:03:13 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 01:26:35 -0500, Apostate
<godless.*****@yeehaw.org.invalid> wrote:
In article <r255q35vrhcuoh341sm7o16lkaptidfucm@4ax.com>, Michael Gray says...
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:45:41 -0000, nero <nero@austin.rr.com> wrote:
From Bill M / 30jan08
Religion is not based on objective verifiable evidence.
Religion is things hoped for but not yet seen or proven.
Science is things seen and proven but not necessarily hoped for.
'Gotta love the keen minds in this group.
nero
A most perspicacious and succinct observation on Bill's behalf.
One harbors certain suspicions about BM's bona fides, seeing how the poster's pov
appears to shift rather fluidly when trolling opportunities lend themselves.
Unless we have more than one user of the same nick, and I've failed to notice
mail address distinctions.
Nonetheless, my assessment of this single post stands, irrespective of
of who posted it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: nomination |
31 Jan 2008 02:38:31 PM |
|
|
nero wrote:
From Bill M / 30jan08
Religion is not based on objective verifiable evidence.
Religion is things hoped for but not yet seen or proven.
Science is things seen and proven but not necessarily hoped for.
'Gotta love the keen minds in this group.
Proof is for mathematicians and moonshiners, not science. ;-)
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
