Not a TQOTM, but worthwhile anyway (was: Time plus Chance)



 Religions > Atheism > Not a TQOTM, but worthwhile anyway (was: Time plus Chance)

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Adam Marczyk"
Date: 02 Oct 2003 05:36:00 PM
Object: Not a TQOTM, but worthwhile anyway (was: Time plus Chance)
Though it wasn't originally posted on this group and so isn't eligible for
TQOTM, this was just too good to let it pass by the attention of the fine
folks of a.a.:
Michael <mikeburt@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:mikeburt-0210031739030001@sdn-ap-006dcwashp0075.dialsprint.net...

In article <JmZeb.4602$zF1.1007@news02.roc.ny>, "Adam Marczyk"
<see@sig.com> wrote:

[...]

Religious organizations who support evolution:


http://www.ncseweb.org/resources/articles/2027_statements_from_religious_orga_1_26_2001.asp


Quite a listing of radical liberation theology support from Christianity
including the following:

Episcopal Bishop Of Atlanta, Pastoral Letter
The General Convention Of The Episcopal Church
The Lutheran World Federation
Roman Catholic Church (1981)
Unitarian Universalist Association (1977)
Unitarian Universalist Association (1982)
United Methodist Church
United Presbyterian Church In The U.S.A. (1982)
United Presbyterian Church In The U.S.A. (1983)

Kind of like a who's who of the anti-Christ.

--
"We have loved the stars too fondly | a.a. #2001
to be fearful of the night." | http://www.ebonmusings.org
--Tombstone epitaph of | e-mail: ebonmuse!hotmail.com
two amateur astronomers, | ICQ: 8777843
quoted in Carl Sagan's _Cosmos_ | PGP Key ID: 0x5C66F737
----------------------------------------------------------------------
.

User: "John Hattan"

Title: Re: Not a TQOTM, but worthwhile anyway (was: Time plus Chance) 02 Oct 2003 08:07:22 PM
"Adam Marczyk" <see@sig.com> wrote:

Though it wasn't originally posted on this group and so isn't eligible for
TQOTM, this was just too good to let it pass by the attention of the fine
folks of a.a.:

I like the part about how UU's are the antichrist :)

Michael <mikeburt@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:mikeburt-0210031739030001@sdn-ap-006dcwashp0075.dialsprint.net...

In article <JmZeb.4602$zF1.1007@news02.roc.ny>, "Adam Marczyk"
<see@sig.com> wrote:


[...]

Religious organizations who support evolution:


http://www.ncseweb.org/resources/articles/2027_statements_from_religious_orga_1_26_2001.asp


Quite a listing of radical liberation theology support from Christianity
including the following:

Episcopal Bishop Of Atlanta, Pastoral Letter
The General Convention Of The Episcopal Church
The Lutheran World Federation
Roman Catholic Church (1981)
Unitarian Universalist Association (1977)
Unitarian Universalist Association (1982)
United Methodist Church
United Presbyterian Church In The U.S.A. (1982)
United Presbyterian Church In The U.S.A. (1983)

Kind of like a who's who of the anti-Christ.

---
John Hattan Grand High UberPope - First Church of Shatnerology
john@thecodezone.com http://www.shatnerology.com
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Re: Not Sure if ALL of this is true - but it is interesting
OT: Foreigners May Not Have Liked the War, but They Financed It
god loves YOU but not them!
Panic in Palermo, but Heidi Klum was not there
OT: Iraqis are disgusted but not surprised at PoW abuse
What is it with this IPU stuff? IPU does not exist, but PU does! A Humorous trip into the world of ontology
Slightly OT (but not too much) - Conversation with Mordechai Vanunu
God Wants to Bless You, But Not in the Way you Think!
I may be in bad company, but this law will not work
RE: Michael Moore: Guns Are Okay For Me, But Not For You
Yet more poetry, but not entirely OT
Re: I want to ask you the most important question of your life. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good you are, nor if you are a church member, but are you saved? Are you sure you will go to Heaven when you die? The reason s
OT: Jackson Verdict Reached, but not yet announced...
Not Quite Barney, but Showing a Softer Side
Gov Saw Flood Risk but not Levee Failure
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER