| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
20 Jan 2006 05:54:17 PM |
| Object: |
Not Suitable for Children |
Not Suitable for Children
by Angela Wittman
http://www.defendingtruth.org/content.asp?content_id=224
How many children must suffer? How many hearts must be broken? How many
girls and boys will contract STDs? How many babies will be murdered via
abortion?
Once again, I must stress the importance of parents investigating any and
all sex education their child is receiving; this includes all government,
private, Christian and Parochial schools, as well as Church and other youth
groups/clubs/organizations.
Week after week, on Wednesday afternoons during the summer of this year, I
watched parents drop off their precious children at the baby-killing Planned
Parenthood abortion mill in St. Louis, Missouri to receive sexual activity
instructions.
Year after year, when I served on the Waterloo, Illinois School Board
(1995 - 2000), a group of concerned citizens and myself begged the
administrators to stop teaching comprehensive sex ed, and year after year
they continued to allow it to be taught in the high school. This continued
even though we presented them with evidence that comprehensive sex ed does
not prevent sexual activity, STDs or pregnancies -- instead it actually
promotes these things!
At one point, the school district received a FREE abstinence course to use
in the high school, which then sat on a shelf, and collected dust.
What was their excuse for allowing comprehensive sex ed to be taught to
young impressionable students? They are going to do it anyway, they need to
know how to do it safely!
Now after ten years of sowing and reaping the harmful effects of
comprehensive sex ed, the school district will be allowing an abstinence
course to be taught in the high school.
But how many children have already suffered? How many hearts have been
broken? How many girls and boys have contracted STD's? How many babies were
murdered via abortion? Only the LORD knows, and I tremble with fear for
those who have condoned, contributed and encouraged this shameful
propagation of sexual sin in my community.
Dear friends, girls as young as 9-years are being diagnosed with gonorrhea
of the throat! This ought not to be! How shameful for that child! How
devastating for her parents! If your heart does not break for this
situation, then you are part of the problem. This ought to cause us to weep;
may we cry out to God Almighty for forgiveness and help.
Parents: It is your responsibility to teach your child about reproduction
and morality. --It is not the responsibility of your local school district
or Planned Parenthood or SIECUS!
--
"Honesty, Integrity, Compassion, and Decency"
.
|
|
| User: "Frank Arthur" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Suitable for Children |
20 Jan 2006 07:04:09 PM |
|
|
Abstinance did not stop hundreds of Priests from molesting and raping
children.
Lack of sexual information by Priests who molested and raped children was a
good thing J Young?
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:GaSdnbjYWN2F5UzeRVn-gA@giganews.com...
Not Suitable for Children
by Angela Wittman
http://www.defendingtruth.org/content.asp?content_id=224
How many children must suffer? How many hearts must be broken? How many
girls and boys will contract STDs? How many babies will be murdered via
abortion?
Once again, I must stress the importance of parents investigating any and
all sex education their child is receiving; this includes all government,
private, Christian and Parochial schools, as well as Church and other
youth
groups/clubs/organizations.
Week after week, on Wednesday afternoons during the summer of this year, I
watched parents drop off their precious children at the baby-killing
Planned
Parenthood abortion mill in St. Louis, Missouri to receive sexual activity
instructions.
Year after year, when I served on the Waterloo, Illinois School Board
(1995 - 2000), a group of concerned citizens and myself begged the
administrators to stop teaching comprehensive sex ed, and year after year
they continued to allow it to be taught in the high school. This continued
even though we presented them with evidence that comprehensive sex ed does
not prevent sexual activity, STDs or pregnancies -- instead it actually
promotes these things!
At one point, the school district received a FREE abstinence course to use
in the high school, which then sat on a shelf, and collected dust.
What was their excuse for allowing comprehensive sex ed to be taught to
young impressionable students? They are going to do it anyway, they need
to
know how to do it safely!
Now after ten years of sowing and reaping the harmful effects of
comprehensive sex ed, the school district will be allowing an abstinence
course to be taught in the high school.
But how many children have already suffered? How many hearts have been
broken? How many girls and boys have contracted STD's? How many babies
were
murdered via abortion? Only the LORD knows, and I tremble with fear for
those who have condoned, contributed and encouraged this shameful
propagation of sexual sin in my community.
Dear friends, girls as young as 9-years are being diagnosed with gonorrhea
of the throat! This ought not to be! How shameful for that child! How
devastating for her parents! If your heart does not break for this
situation, then you are part of the problem. This ought to cause us to
weep;
may we cry out to God Almighty for forgiveness and help.
Parents: It is your responsibility to teach your child about reproduction
and morality. --It is not the responsibility of your local school district
or Planned Parenthood or SIECUS!
--
"Honesty, Integrity, Compassion, and Decency"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cuthbert Thistlethwaite" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Suitable for Children |
20 Jan 2006 06:25:30 PM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
.. . .
Dear friends, girls as young as 9-years are being diagnosed with gonorrhea
of the throat! This ought not to be! How shameful for that child!
What sort of moron blames the child?
Look at the stump-jumping hillbilly Christian father and brothers . . .
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Santolina chamaecyparissus" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Suitable for Children |
20 Jan 2006 10:19:31 PM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
Not Suitable for Children
The Roman Corpse Cult worshiping the festering body of John Paul II? A
Cosmic Superbeing with complete control over everything you do? A
Man-God tortured to death? Men, women, children, and animals
remorselessly butchered so that the "chosen people" can inhabit their
land? You're right, not suitable for children.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "sgeo" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Suitable for Children |
20 Jan 2006 06:03:49 PM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
Not Suitable for Children
by Angela Wittman
http://www.defendingtruth.org/content.asp?content_id=224
When it said *logic* and *truth*, my first thought was that it's an atheist
site. I guess not..
How many children must suffer? How many hearts must be broken? How many
girls and boys will contract STDs?
Of course, it's religion that attempts to forbid sex-ed that causes some of
the problems (not all, admittedly, but Abstinence only won't help)
How many babies will be murdered via
abortion?
Once again, I must stress the importance of parents investigating any and
all sex education their child is receiving; this includes all government,
private, Christian and Parochial schools, as well as Church and other
youth groups/clubs/organizations.
I guess the goal is to prevent education of the most urgent sort?
Week after week, on Wednesday afternoons during the summer of this year, I
watched parents drop off their precious children at the baby-killing
Planned Parenthood abortion mill in St. Louis, Missouri to receive sexual
activity instructions.
Year after year, when I served on the Waterloo, Illinois School Board
(1995 - 2000), a group of concerned citizens and myself begged the
administrators to stop teaching comprehensive sex ed, and year after year
they continued to allow it to be taught in the high school. This continued
even though we presented them with evidence that comprehensive sex ed does
not prevent sexual activity, STDs or pregnancies -- instead it actually
promotes these things!
At one point, the school district received a FREE abstinence course to use
in the high school, which then sat on a shelf, and collected dust.
Just because it's *FREE*, doesn't mean it's good to use..
What was their excuse for allowing comprehensive sex ed to be taught to
young impressionable students? They are going to do it anyway, they need
to know how to do it safely!
Now after ten years of sowing and reaping the harmful effects of
comprehensive sex ed, the school district will be allowing an abstinence
course to be taught in the high school.
But how many children have already suffered? How many hearts have been
broken? How many girls and boys have contracted STD's?
How many of these children wouldn't have contracted STD's if they had proper
sex-ed?
How many babies
were murdered via abortion? Only the LORD knows, and I tremble with fear
for those who have condoned, contributed and encouraged this shameful
propagation of sexual sin in my community.
Dear friends, girls as young as 9-years are being diagnosed with gonorrhea
of the throat! This ought not to be!
I fully agree. Maybe, if religion was less prominent in your community..
How shameful for that child!
You're concerned about *shame* at that point?
How
devastating for her parents! If your heart does not break for this
situation, then you are part of the problem. This ought to cause us to
weep; may we cry out to God Almighty for forgiveness and help.
Parents: It is your responsibility to teach your child about reproduction
and morality. --It is not the responsibility of your local school district
or Planned Parenthood or SIECUS!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "bob young" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Suitable for Children |
30 Jan 2006 12:59:16 AM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
Not Suitable for Children
by Angela Wittman
http://www.defendingtruth.org/content.asp?content_id=224
How many children must suffer? How many hearts must be broken? How many
girls and boys will contract STDs? How many babies will be murdered via
abortion?
How many millions of children this year will be brain washed by their parents
into following religionus dogma of some kind?
How would you like to be brought up as a communist and know nothing other than
the communist creed? Would this be any different, or any more criminal?
Once again, I must stress the importance of parents investigating any and
all sex education their child is receiving; this includes all government,
private, Christian and Parochial schools, as well as Church and other youth
groups/clubs/organizations.
Week after week, on Wednesday afternoons during the summer of this year, I
watched parents drop off their precious children at the baby-killing Planned
Parenthood abortion mill in St. Louis, Missouri to receive sexual activity
instructions.
Year after year, when I served on the Waterloo, Illinois School Board
(1995 - 2000), a group of concerned citizens and myself begged the
administrators to stop teaching comprehensive sex ed, and year after year
they continued to allow it to be taught in the high school. This continued
even though we presented them with evidence that comprehensive sex ed does
not prevent sexual activity, STDs or pregnancies -- instead it actually
promotes these things!
At one point, the school district received a FREE abstinence course to use
in the high school, which then sat on a shelf, and collected dust.
What was their excuse for allowing comprehensive sex ed to be taught to
young impressionable students? They are going to do it anyway, they need to
know how to do it safely!
Now after ten years of sowing and reaping the harmful effects of
comprehensive sex ed, the school district will be allowing an abstinence
course to be taught in the high school.
But how many children have already suffered? How many hearts have been
broken? How many girls and boys have contracted STD's? How many babies were
murdered via abortion? Only the LORD knows, and I tremble with fear for
those who have condoned, contributed and encouraged this shameful
propagation of sexual sin in my community.
Dear friends, girls as young as 9-years are being diagnosed with gonorrhea
of the throat! This ought not to be! How shameful for that child! How
devastating for her parents! If your heart does not break for this
situation, then you are part of the problem. This ought to cause us to weep;
may we cry out to God Almighty for forgiveness and help.
Parents: It is your responsibility to teach your child about reproduction
and morality. --It is not the responsibility of your local school district
or Planned Parenthood or SIECUS!
--
"Honesty, Integrity, Compassion, and Decency"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "newsguy" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Suitable for Children |
21 Jan 2006 04:36:19 AM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
Not Suitable for Children
by Angela Wittman
http://www.defendingtruth.org/content.asp?content_id=224
Year after year, when I served on the Waterloo, Illinois School Board
(1995 - 2000), a group of concerned citizens and myself begged the
administrators to stop teaching comprehensive sex ed, and year after year
they continued to allow it to be taught in the high school.
And year after year the USA is dead last in protecting their
teenagers from teen pregnancy as a result.
http://www.lysator.liu.se/nordic/mirror/unicef/inbirth.htm
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Matty" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Suitable for Children |
20 Jan 2006 06:06:31 PM |
|
|
On 2006-01-21 12:54:17 +1300, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> said:
Not Suitable for Children
by Angela Wittman
blab blab blab
More emotive clap trap by people playing on hysteria about nothing.
As for the 9 year old with gonorrhea - solution, stop the father from
face fucking her! we all know the number one vector of child abuse are
organisations and families with strong religious values.
Matt
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bitching Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Suitable for Children |
20 Jan 2006 08:26:06 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:06:31 +1300, Matty <kaiwainz@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 2006-01-21 12:54:17 +1300, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> said:
Not Suitable for Children
by Angela Wittman
blab blab blab
More emotive clap trap by people playing on hysteria about nothing.
As for the 9 year old with gonorrhea - solution, stop the father from
face fucking her! we all know the number one vector of child abuse are
organisations and families with strong religious values.
You speaking of your homeland, New Zealand, of course. In the US, on a
per capita basis, the most frequent sexual abuser of children are
homosexual males. In that measure they far, far exceed the acts by
heterosexual males.
Matt
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Suitable for Children |
20 Jan 2006 09:04:01 PM |
|
|
Bitching Bonney <bibon@Râlant.org> wrote:
Matty <kaiwainz@yahoo.com> wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> said:
Not Suitable for Children
by Angela Wittman
blab blab blab
More emotive clap trap by people playing on hysteria about nothing.
As for the 9 year old with gonorrhea - solution, stop the father from
face fucking her! we all know the number one vector of child abuse are
organisations and families with strong religious values.
You speaking of your homeland, New Zealand, of course. In the US, on a
per capita basis, the most frequent sexual abuser of children are
homosexual males.
An outright lie.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Matty" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Suitable for Children |
20 Jan 2006 09:57:06 PM |
|
|
On 2006-01-21 15:26:06 +1300, Bitching Bonney <bibon@Râlant.org> said:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:06:31 +1300, Matty <kaiwainz@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 2006-01-21 12:54:17 +1300, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> said:
Not Suitable for Children
by Angela Wittman
blab blab blab
More emotive clap trap by people playing on hysteria about nothing.
As for the 9 year old with gonorrhea - solution, stop the father from
face fucking her! we all know the number one vector of child abuse are
organisations and families with strong religious values.
You speaking of your homeland, New Zealand, of course. In the US, on a
per capita basis, the most frequent sexual abuser of children are
homosexual males. In that measure they far, far exceed the acts by
heterosexual males.
Oh pulease.
WHo has the HIGHEST rate of teen pregnancies, even with its so-called
'christian convictions'? yeah, the US.
Matt
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Duca" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Suitable for Children |
21 Jan 2006 09:41:38 AM |
|
|
in article dm63t15i14jesd7g73apgotich5p4fe6f8@4ax.com, Bitching Bonney at
bibon@R?lant.org wrote on 1/20/06 9:26 PM:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:06:31 +1300, Matty <kaiwainz@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 2006-01-21 12:54:17 +1300, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> said:
Not Suitable for Children
by Angela Wittman
blab blab blab
More emotive clap trap by people playing on hysteria about nothing.
As for the 9 year old with gonorrhea - solution, stop the father from
face fucking her! we all know the number one vector of child abuse are
organisations and families with strong religious values.
You speaking of your homeland, New Zealand, of course. In the US, on a
per capita basis, the most frequent sexual abuser of children are
homosexual males. In that measure they far, far exceed the acts by
heterosexual males. My church told me that.
Matt
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Suitable for Children |
22 Jan 2006 03:40:26 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 18:54:17 -0500, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
Not Suitable for Children
The Christian superstition is certainly not suitable for children.
I'm glad to see you agree.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "LC" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Suitable for Children |
21 Jan 2006 12:22:29 PM |
|
|
Pedophile "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:GaSdnbjYWN2F5UzeRVn-gA@giganews.com...
"J Young": Not Suitable for Children
"Instead of funding wars overseas; why not fund us people who want to
spread a little love.NAMBLA is all about togetherness and comforting
our young people with guidance from an older generation Please help
us. I know the folks in these NG's can identify with our plight. We
are just very misunderstood; we get bad press, but we stand for love"
J "lil loose" Young.
Newsgroups:
alt.support.boy-lovers,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.politics.usa.republican,soc.culture.african.american
Subject: Federal funds for NAMBLA
Date: 10 Mar 2004 09:44:11 -0800
Message-ID: <5a858a1e.0403100944.676efbd7@posting.google.com>
LC~ "J Young", making himself 'understood'.
"Why is it okay to kill a baby ,but not okay to f*ck him or her?" ~ JYoung,
whining pedophile.
From: (Jon Young)
Message-ID: <25e1e54f.0404252034.356729e@posting.google.com>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Duca" |
|
| Title: Re: Not Suitable for Children |
21 Jan 2006 09:38:05 AM |
|
|
in article GaSdnbjYWN2F5UzeRVn-gA@giganews.com, J Young at
youngopinions@aol.com wrote on 1/20/06 6:54 PM:
Not Suitable for Children
Angela Wittman
Poor dear must be barren...or she simply has no better luck in
trapping a man, than J Yo does in getting girls.
Sounds like they'd make a perfect match.
Paul
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
(Rev 1.1 Not suitable for AP journalists) {HRI 20050803-V3.4.1} Murderers are always lying about their "motives" - stop believing and parrotting them, start FACING them - The Motive Of Terrorism etc., Is NOT Political, NOT Ethnic, NOT Religious, NOT
Questionnaire for determining if you are an atheist or not.
Science does not support Mel
OT: Not much has changed in the US
Irony Meter test: Islam should not be imposed on Christians
Re: FDR not tell the American people any lies
IMPEACHED SEX OFFENDER, BILL CLINTON, NOT ALLOWED AT REAGAN FUNERAL. LIBERAL PERVERTS WERE NOT ALLOWED!
Is Arafat DEAD or not ? ? ?
| Proof the god concept is NOT PERFECT
Re: Church and State Need Not be Seperate, Quote the Bugboy
Yet more poetry, but not entirely OT
Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder. ==> Do Not Waste Time Reasoning with Terrorists = Demon-KKK-Rats!
Survey: College Republcians Will Not Serve
GOP Chickenhawks: Military Service "Not For Our Kind of People" (GOP, the Party of Treason and Cowardance)
Chimps and humans not so similar after all
|
|
|
