Religions > Atheism > NYT says Bush Screwed Up; Published Iraq's WMD plans on Internet
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Fred Stone" |
| Date: |
03 Nov 2006 06:33:40 AM |
| Object: |
NYT says Bush Screwed Up; Published Iraq's WMD plans on Internet |
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/03/world/middleeast/03documents.html
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"Some days the impatience with Iraq just seems artificial — as though the
real argument is about something else entirely." - Dinocrat
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
| User: "Fester" |
|
| Title: Re: NYT says Bush Screwed Up; Published Iraq's WMD plans on Internet |
03 Nov 2006 07:13:47 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98705670259D9fstone69@66.150.105.47...
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/03/world/middleeast/03documents.html
Yes, I'm touched by the NYT newly-discovered regard for the protection of
sensitive intelligence information. Here's what Hoekstra had to say about
it:
<quote>
"These documents also raise several additional issues of interest. First, it
is extraordinary that the New York Times now acknowledges that the captured
documents demonstrate that '[Saddam] Hussein's scientists were on the verge
of building an atom bomb, as little as a year away.' This only reinforces
the value of these documents in understanding the threat posed by Saddam
Hussein's regime. Only 1 percent of the estimated 120 million pages of
captured documents have been reviewed, and we must continue working to
promptly understand these materials. If there is concern about Saddam's
nuclear program, there should be similar concern about potential connections
between Saddam and al-Qaeda suggested in the documents.
"Second, my staff's preliminary review of the documents in question suggests
that at least some of them may be internal IAEA documents. There is a
serious question of why and how the Iraqi[s had] these documents in the
first place. We need to explore that carefully - I certainly hope there will
be no evidence that the IAEA had been penetrated by Saddam's regime.
"Finally, it is disappointing but not surprising that the New York Times
would continue to participate in such blatant and transparent political
ploys, including what I believe are improper efforts by the IAEA to
interfere with U.S. domestic affairs. The sad reality is that the New York
Times has done far more damage to U.S. national security by the disclosure
of vital, classified, intelligence programs than is likely to be caused by
the inadvertent disclosure of decades-old information that had already been
in the hands of Saddam's regime."
</quote>
Yes, that's right, Saddam was about a year away from building his own nukes
when we invaded Iraq. But I'm sure the libs will just tell us that we would
have been better off if we let him do it. Just keep repeating that mantra
that Saddam was no longer interested in pursuing or reconstituting WMDs.
And don't let that bit about him having internal IAEA documents on hand.
I'm sure there's a perfectly innocent explanation and that nobody on the UN
would be so corrupt as to sell them to him.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: NeoCon Traitor "Fester" Lie of the Day: Saddam Had WMD in 2003 |
04 Nov 2006 10:13:43 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 04 Nov 2006 01:13:47 GMT, "Fester" <not@home.com> wrote:
Yes, that's right, Saddam was about a year away from building his own nukes
when we invaded Iraq.
in 1993.
Whay are you NeoCon traitors so dishonest?
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
The Bush 'balanced' budget: -2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2828 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
newsgroups Yang promises not to revenge post
in response to Sound-of-Trumpet's *****:
rec.art.scifi.written
sci.archaeology
soc.history.what-if
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: NeoCon Traitor "Fester" Lie of the Day: Saddam Had WMD in 2003 |
04 Nov 2006 12:18:39 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 04 Nov 2006 08:13:43 -0800, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's
Cocaine Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 04 Nov 2006 01:13:47 GMT, "Fester" <not@home.com> wrote:
Yes, that's right, Saddam was about a year away from building his own nukes
when we invaded Iraq.
in 1993.
Whay are you NeoCon traitors so dishonest?
It's not dishonesty. Saddam was fixin to think about planning to get
started on nukes in about a year. That is, he was fixin to think
about it in a year ... or 10. It's a "misspeaking" is all.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"The study of geology is ok-But not when it contradicts what is laid
out in the Bible that the earth is more than 10,000 years old."
- Doug Lee, Creationist
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
This signature was made by SigChanger.
You can find SigChanger at: http://www.phranc.nl/
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
